Plan Review Details - Permit 06090892
Plan Review Stops For Permit 06090892
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2006-11-30 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2006-11-30 Time 08:47 Rev Time 0.50
Received By jgomez Date 2006-11-30 Time 07:46 Sent To  
Notes
2006-11-30 09:08:52CONTRATOR'S RESPONSE WAS THAT INCORRECT CHART WAS
 REFERENCED AND REQUESTED RE-SUBMITTAL REFUND.
  
 RESPONSE:
 THE FOLLOWING IS THE CORRECT WAY OF READING THE TABLES:
 TABLE 1 ON PAGE 7 OF 13 OF DRAWING #05-578 IS TO
 DETERMINE THE MAXIMUM SHUTTER SPAN ALLOWED ACCORDING TO
 THE NEGATIVE DESIGN PRESSURES, WHICH IS USUALLY THE
 HIGHER NUMBER. ANCHOR SCHEDULE CHART ON SAME PAGE IS TO
 DETERMINE THE ANCHOR SPACING ACCORDING TO THE MAXIMUM
 DESIGN PRESSURES. SEE HEADING ON THIRD COLUMN. IT READS
 "LOAD (W) P.S.F. MAX. (SEE NOTE 1). THEREFORE, THE
 MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURE IS THE NEGATIVE PRESSURE AND
 ANCHOR SPACING SHALL BE ACCORDING TO THAT DESIGN
 PRESSURE.
 CONTRACTOR'S COOPERATION SINCE FIRST CHECKLIST WOULD
 HAVE AVOID UNNECESSARYDELAYSAND ADDITIONAL FEES.
 WHEN THERE ARE QUESTIONS CONCERNING THE PLANREVIEW
 COMMENTS, CONTRACTOR IS ALWAYS WELCOME TO CALL MY
 OFFICE FOR CLARIFICATION.
  
 JULIO GOMEZ
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 (561)805-6712
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2006-11-06 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2006-11-06 Time 17:54 Rev Time 0.50
Received By jgomez Date 2006-11-06 Time 17:54 Sent To  
Notes
2006-11-06 18:00:16BUILDING REVIEW 2ND CHECKLIST:
  
 ***FROM PREVIOUS CHECKLIST:
 1- DRAWING 7 OF 13: INCORRECTANCHOR SPACING WAS
 MARKED. CALCULATED DESIGN PRESSURES ARE -33PSF.ANCHOR
 SPACING WAS MARKED FOR DESIGN PRESSURES OF -31.2PSF.
 ACCORDING TO NOTE #2 NEED TO USE HIGHER LOADS FOR
 TABULATED VALUES. THEREFORE, NEED TO USE THE ANCHOR
 SPACING FOR -47.2PSF. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 JULIO GOMEZ
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 (561)805-6712
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2006-10-13 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2006-10-13 Time 11:07 Rev Time 0.33
Received By jgomez Date 2006-10-13 Time 11:06 Sent To  
Notes
2006-10-13 11:22:03BUILDING REVIEW CHECKLIST;
 1- PROVIDE STRUCTURAL DETAIL WITH COMPLETE SPECS FOR
 FOOTING USING #5 REBAR AS SPECIFIED ON DRAWING
 SUBMITTED. WHY IS A FOOTER REQUIRED?.HOW IS FOOTER
 FASTENED? SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.
  
 2- DRAWING5 OF 13 OFSHUTTERS DRAWINGS HAVE WALL
 MOUNT SECTION CIRCLED. IF THIS IS THE PROPOSED MOUNTING
 CONDITIONS, THEN WHY IS A FOOTER REQUIRED?. PROVIDE
 CLARIFICATION AND SPECIFIC MOUNTING CONDITIONS. SEC.
 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.
  
 3- DRAWING 7 OF 13: INCORRECT ANCHOR SPACING WAS
 MARKED.CALCULATED DESIGN PRESSURES ARE -33PSF (OR 35
 IF USING TABLE 1).SEE TABLE NOTE #2 AT BOTTOM OF PAGE
 AND REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 JULIO GOMEZ
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 (561)805-6712
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2006-11-29 Cont ID  
Sent By spalmer Date 2006-11-29 Time 18:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By spalmer Date 2006-11-29 Time 18:10 Sent To B
Notes
2006-11-29 18:11:32RESUB/JGOMEZ DESK
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2006-10-31 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2006-10-31 Time 15:44 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2006-10-31 Time 15:44 Sent To B
Notes
2006-10-31 15:47:33TO "JGOMEZ' DESK/RESUB
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2006-10-13 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2006-10-13 Time 11:22 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2006-09-28 Time 10:54 Sent To  
Notes
2006-09-28 00:00:00TO "MISC" BOX#1


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved