| Plan Review Stops For Permit 06090366 |
| Review Stop |
AD |
ADDRESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2006-09-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lursu |
Date |
2006-09-22 |
Time |
10:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lursu |
Date |
2006-09-22 |
Time |
10:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2006-09-22 00:00:00 | EXTENSION #0010 WAS CREATED FOR THE UNIT | | | 201-202 FOR THE 2ND FLOOR. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
AD |
ADDRESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-09-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lursu |
Date |
2006-09-14 |
Time |
14:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lursu |
Date |
2006-09-14 |
Time |
14:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2006-09-14 00:00:00 | PROJECT UNDER REVIEW. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
12 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-07-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-07-28 |
Time |
10:50 |
Rev Time |
0.80 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-07-28 |
Time |
10:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-07-28 10:33:59 | REVISIONS: | | | A-1 REV D 1-02-09 | | | A-3 REV E 4-08-09 | | | A-4 REV D 1-20-09 | | | A5 REV D 1-20-09 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
11 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-02-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-02-03 |
Time |
11:40 |
Rev Time |
1.55 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-02-03 |
Time |
11:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-02-03 11:46:17 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 06090366 | | | ADD: 221 CLEMATIS ST | | | CONT: CASTLE FLORIDA | | | TEL: (561)441-0492 MARK | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | REVISION- DATED 1-21-09 | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1) SHEETS A1, A4 & A5 THE FRONT WINDOW/ FOLDING DOOR | | | ASSEMBLY FOUND ON THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING 2ND FLOOR | | | THE DESIGN PRESSURES AND PRODUCT APPROVALS DO NOT | | | INDICATE THEY HAVE BEEN REVIEWED BY THE DESIGN TEAM. | | | 106.3* PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCT WHICH ARE | | | REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND | | | APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO | | | SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. | | | | | | FL 61G1-23.015 (2) THE ARCHITECT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR | | | SUPERVISING AND REVIEWING ALL PROJECT DATA, REPORTS, | | | SHOP DRAWINGS ETC... | | | | | | 2) THE DETAILED WIND LOAD DESIGN WAS COMPLETED USING A | | | MEAN ROOF HEIGTH OF 30 FEET WHERE AS THE BUILDING | | | HEIGTH IS TAKEN FROM THE HEIGHTEST FLOOR FOR THE | | | NEGATIVE VALUES. SHEET A-5INDICATES TTHE HIGHEST ROOF | | | DECK TO BE 48'-7" WHICH WILL ENACT TABLE 1609.6.2.1(4) | | | ADJUSTMENT FACTORS FOR BUILDING HEIGHTS B-ZONE 50'-0" | | | 1.16 FACTOR PLEASE RE-RUN THE WIND CALCULATIONS AS PER | | | TABLE 1609.6.2.1(4). | | | | | | 3) WIND DESIGN BY GLENN GOLDBERG PE COMPANY NAME | | | VINTAGE DESGN & CONSTRUCTION, INC, 61G15-23.002(2) FL. | | | ADMIN. CODE. PLANS SIGNED & SEALED BY A PROFESSIONAL | | | ENGINEER SHALL INCLUDE EITHER THE: NAME, ADDRESS AND | | | LICENSE NUMBER OF THE ENGINEER OR, THE NAME AND LICENSE | | | NUMBER OF THE ENGINEER AND THE NAME, ADDRESS AND | | | CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER OF THE ENGINEERING | | | BUSINESS THROUGH WHICH THE ENGINEER IS PRACTICING | | | (471.025 F.S. AND 471.023 F.S.). | | | | | | 471.023 F.S. CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION. THE TITLE | | | BLOCK FOR ANY SHEET BEARING THE NAME OF AN ENGINEER | | | PRACTICING UNDER A FICTITIOUS NAME, A CORPORATION, OR A | | | PARTNERSHIP, OFFERING ENGINEERING SERVICES, SHALL | | | INCLUDE THE CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER. ADD | | | THE NUMBER TO EACH SHEET. THIS MAY BE ADDED BY HAND. | | | | | | 4) RCL STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, LLC 61G15-23.002(2) FL. | | | ADMIN. CODE. PLANS SIGNED & SEALED BY A PROFESSIONAL | | | ENGINEER SHALL INCLUDE EITHER THE: NAME, ADDRESS AND | | | LICENSE NUMBER OF THE ENGINEER OR, THE NAME AND LICENSE | | | NUMBER OF THE ENGINEER AND THE NAME, ADDRESS AND | | | CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER OF THE ENGINEERING | | | BUSINESS THROUGH WHICH THE ENGINEER IS PRACTICING | | | (471.025 F.S. AND 471.023 F.S.). | | | | | | 471.023 F.S. CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION. THE TITLE | | | BLOCK FOR ANY SHEET BEARING THE NAME OF AN ENGINEER | | | PRACTICING UNDER A FICTITIOUS NAME, A CORPORATION, OR A | | | PARTNERSHIP, OFFERING ENGINEERING SERVICES, SHALL | | | INCLUDE THE CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER. ADD | | | THE NUMBER TO EACH SHEET. THIS MAY BE ADDED BY HAND. | | | | | | 5) RCL ENGINEERING IS USING THE MORE RESTRICTIVE "C" | | | EXPOSURE BUT DOES NOT INDICATE THE MEAN ROOF HEIGTH OF | | | THE BUILDING, TABLE 1609.6.2.1(4) PLEASE CORRECT THE | | | ASSUMPTIONS AND DESIGN PRESSURES. | | | | | | 6) SHEET A-3 DETAIL4 &6 PLEASE PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS | | | FOR GUARDRAIL SYSTEM 1607.7.1.1.CONCENTRATED LOAD. | | | HANDRAIL ASSEMBLIES AND GUARDS SHALL BE ABLE TO RESIST | | | A SINGLE CONCENTRATED LOAD OF 200 POUNDS (0.89 KN), | | | APPLIED IN ANY DIRECTION AT ANY POINT ALONG THE TOP, | | | AND HAVE ATTACHMENT DEVICES AND SUPPORTING STRUCTURE TO | | | TRANSFER THIS LOADING TO APPROPRIATE STRUCTURAL | | | ELEMENTS OF THE BUILDING. | | | | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)805-6731 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | MEMBER OF BOAF, THE BUILDING OFFICIALS ASSOCIATION OF | | | FLORIDA: PROTECTING LIVES AND PROPERTY SINCE 1953. | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | | LAW. UNDER FLORIDA STATE STATUTE SB 80, E-MAIL | | | ADDRESSES ARE PUBLIC RECORDS.WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO | | | OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE | | | PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. | | | YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE THEREFORE SUBJECT TO | | | PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
10 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-07-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-07-01 |
Time |
16:27 |
Rev Time |
1.11 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-07-01 |
Time |
16:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-01 16:28:37 | REV "C" A-1, A-2, A-3 & A-4. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
9 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-05-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-05-30 |
Time |
15:58 |
Rev Time |
0.77 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-05-30 |
Time |
15:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-05-30 15:59:17 | REVISION- B OK SHEETS: | | | COVERSHEET | | | A-1 | | | A-4 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
8 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-05-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-05-30 |
Time |
15:51 |
Rev Time |
1.11 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-05-30 |
Time |
15:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-05-30 15:57:54 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 06090366 | | | ADD: 221 CLEMATIS ST | | | CONT: CASTLE FLORIDA | | | TEL: (561)441-0492 MARK | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | REVISION- B SHEET A2 REVIEW | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | SHEET A-2 DETAIL # 2 CLEARLY INDICATES THE 6'-9" CLEAR | | | HEIGTH FROM THE EDGE OF THE STEEL BEAM TO BENEATH THE | | | BOTTOM OF THE STAIRWELL STRINGER. THE CLEAR HEIGTH | | | MAYBE 6'-0" AS DEPICTED ON THE PLANS. | | | PLEASE SEE 1009.2 MINIMUM CLEAR HEIGTH OF 80". | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-04-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-04-03 |
Time |
16:27 |
Rev Time |
3.33 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-04-03 |
Time |
16:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-04-03 16:45:27 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 06090366 | | | ADD: 221 CLEMATIS STPHASE II SUITE 104 CONT: | | | CASTLE FLORIDA | | | TEL: (561)856-6655 | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | REVISIONREVIEW: | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | --- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- | | | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUM- | | | BER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION | | | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICA | | | TION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK | | | YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | 1) PLANS ARE MISSING THE BUILDING TYPE? TABLE 503/ | | | 601. | | | | | | 2) PLEASE SEE A1VERSES A4 FOR LAYOUT OF FURNATURE AND | | | FOR LIFE SAFETY, THEY DO NOT MATCH AT THE FRONT OF THE | | | UNIT BY THE GLASS WINDOW UNITS. PLANS INDICATE A COMMON | | | PATH OF TRAVEL OF 76'-0". | | | PLEASE SEE 1024.8 COMMON PATH OF TRAVEL FOR ASSEMBLY | | | OCCUPANCY. | | | | | | 3) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS REQUIRED, COVER SHEET | | | INDICATE THESE PLANS ARE FOR PHASE II AREA IS HATCHED | | | TO LOCATE AREA OF WORK TO BE COVERED UNDER PHASE II, | | | BUT THE SHEET A-2 INDICATES WORK UNDER PHASE I INCLUDED | | | IN THIS PLAN, POOL HALL STOREFRONT ELEVATIONS. NOTE | | | SHEET A-4 INDICATES A "NEW TENANT" ON THE MEZZANINE | | | LEVEL. NOTE WHEN YOU ENCLOSE THE MEZZANINE LEVEL IT | | | WILL BECOME A TRUE SECOND FLOOR SEE 505.2 AREA OF | | | MEZZANINE, PLEASE REMOVE THE WORDING OF MEZZANINE. | | | | | | 4) THE WORDING OF "NEW TENANT" ON THE MEZZANINE LEVEL | | | ALSO CREATES ANOTHER ISSUE, IN OUR MEETINGS IT WAS | | | DISCUSSED IT IS THE SAME TENANT A NEW AREA IS BEING | | | OPENED. NEW TENANT WILL REQUIRE, TENANT SEPERATION | | | WALLS OR FIE WALLS REQUIRING A ONE HOUR RATING OF THIS | | | WALL, SEE 708.3. IF THE INTENT IS DIFFERENT THEME | | | AREAS, INDICATE SUCHBUT SINGLE TENANT. | | | | | | 5)SHEET A-2 DETAIL# 2, STAIR ELEVATION INDICATES A | | | 6'-9" CLEAR HEIGTH BUT IN ACTUALLITY THE PLAN INDICATES | | | 6'-0" FROM THE EDGE OF THE NOSING, PLEASE SEE 1009.2 | | | HEADROOM. | | | | | | 6)SHEET A-2 DETAIL# 2 INDICATES THE MECHANICAL | | | EQUIPMENT AS BEING HOUSED WITHIN A MEZZANINE, THIS | | | SPACE IS NOT TO BE CONSIDERED A MEZZANINEBUT A | | | PENTHOUSE SEE 1509.2. | | | THE STAIR THAT LEADS TO THE MECHANICAL PENTHOUSE | | | INDICATES STORAGE IN WHAT WOULD BE CONSIDEREDTHE EXIT | | | THAT LEADS TO THE MECHANICAL PENTHOUSE. THE COMMON WALL | | | FROM THE MECHANICAL PENTHOUSE AND ELECTRIC ROOM IS TO | | | BE 1 HOUR RATED. THIS WOULD CREATE PART OF THE RATED | | | VERTICAL EXIT THE OTHER WALL THAT WOULD BE COMMON TO | | | THE WOMENS RESTROOM TO THE DOORWAY WOULD ALSO CREATE | | | THE 1 HR RATED EXIT TO THE MECHANICAL PENTHOUSE. | | | | | | 7) SHEET A-4 PLEASE INDICATE COMPLIANCE WITH 11-5.1 AND | | | 11-5.2. | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
|
Date |
2008-02-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-02-22 |
Time |
09:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-02-22 |
Time |
09:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-02-22 09:59:38 | NOTES: REVISION "E" |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-12-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-12-20 |
Time |
14:52 |
Rev Time |
3.33 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-12-20 |
Time |
14:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-12-20 15:00:03 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 06090366 | | | ADD: 221 CLEMATIS ST. | | | CONT: CASTLE FLORIDA BUILDING CORP. | | | TEL: (561)756-2491 | | | DEC.21,2007 | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2006 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | REVISON REVIEW: (E) | | | ACTION: REVIEWED | | | | | | BUILDING PROVISOS; | | | | | | 1) NO CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR THIS INTERIOR | | | REMODEL PERMIT UNTIL PERMIT # 06091101 EXTERIOR | | | ALTERATIONS & NEW OVERHEAD GARAGE DOORS, SLOPED GLAZING | | | HAZARDOUS LOCATION 2405.2HAS RECEIVED A CERTIFICATE OF | | | COMPLETION. | | | | | | 2) NEW ENERGY CALCULATIONS SINCE THE SOUTHERN EXPOSURE | | | HAS CHANGED AND MORE GLAZING HAS BEEN ADDED TO THIS | | | WALL FACE (NEW OVERHEAD GLAZED DOORS,), PLUS WORK TO BE | | | COMPLETED UNDER THE OLD ENERGY CALCULATIONS HAS BEEN | | | REMOVED FROM THIS PROJECT. | | | | | | 3) PERMIT # 07120350 WILL NEED TO REFLECT THE SCOPE OF | | | WORK THAT HAS BEEN DELETED FROM THIS PERMIT. THIS | | | PLERMIT 07120350FOR A NEW STAIRWAY INDICATES THAT AN | | | EXISTING NIGHTCLUB IS LOCATED ON THE 2ND FLOOR ADJACENT | | | TO THIS NEW STAIR LOCATION WHICH WAS THE WORK DELETED | | | FROM THIS PERMIT. | | | | | | 4) NOTE, THIS TOTAL BUILDING TOOK THE SPRIKLER | | | INCREASES FOR SIZE OF BUILDING UNDER TABLE 503, THIS | | | TOTAL BUILDING INCLUDING FROM THE FORMER MONKEY CLUB TO | | | FORTE IS ALL ONE BUILDING REQUIRING FIRE SPRINKLERS FOR | | | TENANT SPACES, A OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION A2, 4 STORY | | | BUILDING, BUILDING TYPE IIA,. | | | | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-09-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-09-20 |
Time |
16:55 |
Rev Time |
1.11 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-09-20 |
Time |
16:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-09-20 16:56:31 | BUILDING PROVISO: 1009.2 MINIMUM HEADROOM 6'-8" |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-07-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-07-17 |
Time |
19:54 |
Rev Time |
1.55 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-07-16 |
Time |
22:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-07-17 20:44:28 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 06090366 | | | ADD: 221 CLEMATIS ST SUITE 201 & 202 | | | CONT: CASTLE FLORIDA | | | TEL: (561)856-6655 | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | 3RDREVIEW | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | --- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- | | | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUM- | | | BER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION | | | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICA | | | TION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK | | | YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | 1) FL S S 713.13 | | | NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED | | | WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT BEFORE A | | | PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED. NOTE: 713.13(2) | | | IF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT IS | | | NOT ACTUALLY COMMENCED | | | WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE RECORDING | | | THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & VOID. | | | | | | 2) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 3A)3RD REQUEST, PLANS INDICAE A CODE SUMMARY A TYPE | | | II-BBUILDING SPRINKLERED AND A ASSEMBLY GROUP A-2. | | | TABLE 503 A-2 TYPE II-B ALLOWABLE AREA IS 9,500 SQ FT 2 | | | STORIES. PLANS INDICATE THE FOOTPRINT OF THE BUILDING | | | AS 21,213 SQ FT. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE WHAT AREA AND OR HEIGHT INCREASES THAT | | | YOU MAY TAKE, ALSO NOTE THIS ISCONSIDERED A (4) STORY | | | BUILDING, THE | | | 3RD AND 4TH FLOORS BEING PROPOSED A BUSINESS | | | OCCUPANCY.TABLE 503, 504.2 AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER | | | INCREASES. | | | NEW COMMENT: YES THE SPRINKLER AND FRONTAGE INCREASES | | | WILL PROVIDE THE AREA FOR A TYPE II-B BUILDING, THE | | | **HEIGHT** INCREASE IS ONLY ONE ADDITIONAL STORY. THE | | | DESIGN TEAM WILL NEED TO EVALUATE IF THE TYPE IIA WILL | | | MAKE THE REQUIREMENTS OF TABLE 503FOR A FULLY | | | SPRINKLERED BUILDING. NOTE THIS WILL MEAN THE TOTAL | | | BUILDINGS COLUMNS TO BE 1 HR FIRE RATED, FLOOR | | | ASSEMBLIES SEE TABLE 601. | | | | | | 3B)(1)COMPLIED. | | | | | | 3B)(2)COMPLIED, NOT GOING TO CHANGE THE EXTERIOR OF | | | THE BUILDING. | | | | | | 3C)(1) COMPLIED, REMOVED FROM THIS PERMIT, UNDER | | | SEPERATE PERMIT. | | | PLEASE NOTE THERE IS NO MENTION OF THE EXITS AT | | | THE REAR OF THE BUILDING ADJACENT TO THE ALLEY WAY. OUR | | | JOBSITE MEETING (LAST | | | WEEK OF DEC) REVEALED THE WEST EXIST STAIRS | | | TO HAVE SEVERAL CODE VIOLATIONS: | | | (1) THE EXIT DOOR TO THE STAIRWAY SWUNG INTO THE | | | STAIRWELL, OCCUPANT LOAD > 50. | | | (2) THERE APPEARED TO BE A KITHEN EXHAUST DUCK | | | CUT INTO THE EXIT. | | | (3) THERE ALSO WAS A VESTIBULE AREA DIRECTLY | | | BEHIND THE STAIRWELL THE | | | EXHAUST DUCK DUMPED INTO, THERE IS ANOTHER | | | EXIT DOOR NOT DETERMINED | | | WHERE IS AN EXIT FROM | | | (4 THE STAIRWELL WAS NOT TRUELY FIRE RATED. (5) | | | THERE WAS WINDOWS ON THE PROPERTY LINE. (6) AT | | | THE TOP OF THE STAIRWAY NO DOOR OR ENCLOSURE. | | | (7) IT APPEARS THAT THERE IS PLUMBING 6"OR 8" AT | | | THE TOP OF THE LANDING | | | (8) ALSO STAIRS TO THE MEZZANINE LEVEL ALSO HAD | | | ISSUES WITH | | | ELECTRICAL CONDUCTORS RUNNING THROUGH THE | | | STAIRWELL. | | | (9) THERE ALSO APPEARS TO BE HEIGTH PROBLEMS, | | | MINIMUM HEADROOM | | | (10) NO EXIT LIGTS OR DIRECTIONAL SIGNS | | | | | | 3C()2)COMPLIED, UNDER A SEPERATE PERMIT. | | | THE STAIRWELL TO THE EAST END OF THE ASSEMBLY | | | OCCUPANCY SUITE# 202ALSO HAD SEVERAL CODE VIOLATIONS | | | : | | | (1) STORAGE IN THE STAIRWELL | | | (2) ELECTRIC PANELS AT EACH FLOOR LEVEL | | | (3) NO APPROVED EXIT LIGHTING, OR DIRECTIONAL | | | SIGNS | | | (4) THE EXIT DOOR ALSO SWINGS OUT OVER THE | | | PROPERTY LINE. | | | (5) IT APPEARS THERE IS ALSO PLUMBING IN THE | | | STAIRWELL. | | | | | | 4) WILL REFER BACK TO 3A) FOR ANSWER. | | | | | | 5) COMPLIED, REMOVED FROM SCOPE OF WORK. | | | | | | 6) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 7) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 8A)COMPLIED, REMOVED FROM SCOPE OF WORK. | | | | | | 8B)COMPLIED. REMOVED FROM THE SCOPE OF WORK. | | | | | | 8C)COMPLIED. REMOVED FROM THE SCOPE OF WORK. | | | | | | 8D) COMPLIED, REMOVEDFROM THE SCOPE OF WORK. | | | | | | 8E)COMPLIED, REMOVED FROM SCOPE OF WORK. | | | | | | 9) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 10) COMPLIED, REMOVED FROM THE SCOPE OF WORK. | | | | | | 11) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 12)COMPLIED. | | | | | | 13) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 14) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 15) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 16) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 17) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 18)COMPLIED. | | | | | | 19) COMPLIED, THE EAST EXIT IS IN A 2HR RATED SHAFT, | | | 4STORY BUILDING . | | | | | | 20) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 21) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 22) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 23) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 24) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 25) COMPLIED. | | | | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-01-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-01-03 |
Time |
09:46 |
Rev Time |
5.33 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-01-03 |
Time |
09:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-01-03 13:42:21 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 06090366 | | | ADD: 221 CLEMATIS ST SUITE 201 & 202 | | | CONT: CASTLE FLORIDA | | | TEL: (561)856-6655 | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | 2NDREVIEW | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | --- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- | | | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUM- | | | BER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION | | | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICA | | | TION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK | | | YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | 1) FL S S 713.13 | | | NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED | | | WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT BEFORE A | | | PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED. NOTE: 713.13(2) | | | IF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT IS | | | NOT ACTUALLY COMMENCED | | | WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE RECORDING | | | THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & VOID. | | | | | | 2) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 3A)2ND REQUEST, PLANS INDICAE A CODE SUMMARY A TYPE | | | II-BBUILDING SPRINKLERED AND A ASSEMBLY GROUP A-2. | | | TABLE 503 A-2 TYPE II-B ALLOWABLE AREA IS 9,500 SQ FT 2 | | | STORIES. PLANS INDICATE THE FOOTPRINT OF THE BUILDING | | | AS 21,213 SQ FT. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE WHAT AREA AND OR HEIGHT INCREASES THAT | | | YOU MAY TAKE, ALSO NOTE THIS ISCONSIDERED A (4) STORY | | | BUILDING, THE | | | 3RD AND 4TH FLOORS BEING PROPOSED A BUSINESS | | | OCCUPANCY.TABLE 503, 504.2 AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER | | | INCREASES. | | | | | | 3B)(1)PLEASE PROVIDE A LIFE SAFETY PLAN OF THE TOTAL | | | FIRST FLOOR AND SECOND FLOOR OF THIS ASSEMBLY | | | OCCUPANCY. PLEASE INDICATE OCCUPANT LOADS FOR ALL AREAS | | | OF THE FLOOR, EXAMPLE BARS ARE TO BE CONSIDERED AS A | | | STANDING SPACE 5 NET, DANCE FLOORS 7 NET, TABLE AND | | | CHAIRS 15 NET, POOL TABLES 15 NET, FIXED SEATING 1004.7 | | | AND PROVIDE A TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD.PLEASE NOTE THE | | | EXISTING SUITE 202 IS CONSIDERED A MEZANINE SEE 1004.6 | | | AS HOW TO HANDLE THE OCCUPANT LOADS, WHERE THIS | | | ADDITIONALOCCUPANT LOAD WILL DISCHARGE THROUGH. ALSO | | | INDICATE THE DISPERSAL OF THE OCCUPANT LOAD, PROVIDE | | | ALLOWABLE OCCUPANT LOADS FOR DOORWAYS AND STAIRS. TABLE | | | 1005.1.NOTE THE BOTTLE NECKING EFFECT AT ELEVATOR LOBBY | | | TO SUITE # 202. | | | | | | 3B)(2)THERE IS ANOTHER ISSUE TO BE CONCERNED WITH, | | | THE OCCUPANCY LOAD OF THE NIGHTCLUB, IF OVER 300 1609.5 | | | THE IMPORTANCE FACTOR | | | OF THE BUILDING . THE BUILDING BECOMES A | | | BUILDING CATEGORY III, THE IMPORTANCE FACTOR OF | | | 1.15.PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING WIND INFORMATION. | | | 2004 FL. BLD CODE 1603.1.4 THE | | | FOLLOWING INFORMATION RELATED TO WIND | | | SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION | | | DRAWINGS, | | | 1)- BASIC WIND SPEED, MPH | | | 2)- WIND IMPORTANCE FACTOR, & BUILDING | | | CATEGORY | | | 3)- WIND EXPOSURE | | | 4)- INTERNAL PRESSURE COEFFICIENT, | | | 5)- COMPONENTS & CLADDING, THE DESIGN WIND | | | PRESSURES IN TERMS OF PSF. | | | | | | 3C)(1) PLEASE NOTE THERE IS NO MENTION OF THE EXITS AT | | | THE REAR OF THE BUILDING ADJACENT TO THE ALLEY WAY. OUR | | | JOBSITE MEETING (LAST | | | WEEK OF DEC) REVEALED THE WEST EXIST STAIRS | | | TO HAVE SEVERAL CODE VIOLATIONS: | | | (1) THE EXIT DOOR TO THE STAIRWAY SWUNG INTO THE | | | STAIRWELL, OCCUPANT LOAD > 50. | | | (2) THERE APPEARED TO BE A KITHEN EXHAUST DUCK | | | CUT INTO THE EXIT. | | | (3) THERE ALSO WAS A VESTIBULE AREA DIRECTLY | | | BEHIND THE STAIRWELL THE | | | EXHAUST DUCK DUMPED INTO, THERE IS ANOTHER | | | EXIT DOOR NOT DETERMINED | | | WHERE IS AN EXIT FROM | | | (4 THE STAIRWELL WAS NOT TRUELY FIRE RATED. (5) | | | THERE WAS WINDOWS ON THE PROPERTY LINE. (6) AT | | | THE TOP OF THE STAIRWAY NO DOOR OR ENCLOSURE. | | | (7) IT APPEARS THAT THERE IS PLUMBING 6"OR 8" AT | | | THE TOP OF THE LANDING | | | (8) ALSO STAIRS TO THE MEZZANINE LEVEL ALSO HAD | | | ISSUES WITH | | | ELECTRICAL CONDUCTORS RUNNING THROUGH THE | | | STAIRWELL. | | | (9) THERE ALSO APPEARS TO BE HEIGTH PROBLEMS, | | | MINIMUM HEADROOM | | | (10) NO EXIT LIGTS OR DIRECTIONAL SIGNS | | | | | | 3C()2) THE STAIRWELL TO THE EAST END OF THE ASSEMBLY | | | OCCUPANCY SUITE# 202ALSO HAD SEVERAL CODE VIOLATIONS | | | : | | | (1) STORAGE IN THE STAIRWELL | | | (2) ELECTRIC PANELS AT EACH FLOOR LEVEL | | | (3) NO APPROVED EXIT LIGHTING, OR DIRECTIONAL | | | SIGNS | | | (4) THE EXIT DOOR ALSO SWINGS OUT OVER THE | | | PROPERTY LINE. | | | (5) IT APPEARS THERE IS ALSO PLUMBING IN THE | | | STAIRWELL. | | | | | | 4) WILL REFER BACK TO 3A) FOR ANSWER. | | | | | | 5)2ND REQUEST, W P B ADMINISTRTIVE CODE 106.3.3* | | | PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH | | | ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE | | | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE | | | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL | | | FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. THE DESIGNER OF RECORD | | | INDICATES PRESSURES OF +52/-58 ON | | | SHEET A-4 WHERE AS THE PRODUCT APPROVAL IS APPROVED FOR | | | A DESIGN LOAD OF +30/-30? | | | | | | 6) 2ND REQUEST, FIRE SPRINKLER PLANS ARE REQUIRED AT | | | TIME OF PERMIT APPLICATION,IF THE BUILDING IS | | | DESIGNED | | | AS A FIRE SPRINKLERED BUILDING AND THE AREA INCREASES | | | THAT ARE TAKEN IN TABLE 503 AND 504.2.. THE DESIGNER OF | | | RECORD | | | WILL DESIGN A SYSTEM AFTER THE PERMIT IS ISSUED, SHOP | | | DRAWINGS | | | WILL BE SUBMITTED AT THAT TIME. FL S S 553.79(2) | | | WHENEVER FIRE | | | SPRINKLER PLANS ARE REQUIRED, THEN THE DESIGN OF THOSE | | | SYSTEMS | | | MUST BE INCLUDED IN THE ORIGINAL PLANS AND | | | SPECIFICATIONS FOR | | | APPROVAL OF THE PERMIT. | | | | | | 7)2ND REQUEST, THE OCCUPANT LOAD TO BE DETERMINED | | | USING THE INFORMATION LISTED IN COMMENT 3B)(1) ABOVE. | | | | | | 8A) 2ND REQUEST, FOR PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE | | | OVERHEAD | | | | | | DOORS. PLANS MAY INDICATE LARGE MISSLE RATED GLASS, BUT | | | THE | | | PRODUCT SUBMITTED | | | STATES THE SYSTEM BUILT AND TESTED DOES NOT HAVE LARGE | | | MISSLE | | | TESTING.1609.1.4(1) PROTECTION OF OPENINGS , GLAZED | | | OPENINGS | | | LOCATED WITHIN 30FEET OF GRADE SHALL MEET THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF | | | THE LARGE MISSLE TEST. | | | PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH | | | PERMIT APPLICATION AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 ARE REQUIRED | | | TO | | | COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR | | | INFORMATION | | | PLEASE SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT | | | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. PRODUCTS WITH | | | STATEWIDE APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE | | | SUBMITTED WITH A COVER SHEET THAT LISTS | | | THE PRODUCT IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE | | | STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT HAVE | | | STATEWIDE APPROVAL, SUBMIT AN APPLICA- | | | TION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR SITE | | | SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE 9B-72. SEE | | | ATTACHMENT. WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG | | | | | | 8B) THERE ARE OTHER CRITERIA TO BE REVIEWED BY THE | | | DESIGNER OF RECORD | | | BEFORE THIS PRODUCT CAN BE APPROVED FOR USE IN THIS | | | BUILDING. | | | CLOPAY SHEET W5 HAS TWO DESIGN CRITEREA TO CONSIDER, | | | THIS REPORT | | | INDICATES FOR A 140 MPH WIND ZONE THE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT | | | OF 30' AND AN | | | IPORTANCE FACTOR OF 1.0. COMMENTS 3B((1) AND 3B)(2) | | | BOTH REFER BACK TO THIS ISSUE. | | | THE SECOND ISSUE THIS BEING A 4 STORY BUILDING IS | | | HEIGHT, ONCE ABOVE 30' THERE | | | ARE MULTIPLIERS THAT EFFECT THE PRESSURES, THE BASIC | | | WIND PRESSURES WILL SHOW AN | | | INCREASEABOVE THE BASE TABLE IN 1609..6.B. THERE IS A | | | HEIGHT MULTIPLIER PLUS THE IMPORTANCE MULTIPLIER!!!!! | | | | | | 8C)THE OVERHEADDOOR IN THE OPEN POSITION NEEDS TO | | | COMPLY WITH 2405 SLOPED GLAZING. | | | 2405.2 ALLOWABLE GLAZING MATERIALS AND LIMITATIONS. | | | SLOPED GLAZING SHALL BE ANY OF THE FOLLOWING MATERIALS, | | | SUBJECT TO THE LISTED LIMITATIONS. | | | 1.FOR MONOLITHIC GLAZING SYSTEMS, THE GLAZING | | | MATERIAL OF THE SINGLE LIGHT OR LAYER SHALL BE | | | LAMINATED GLASS WITH A MINIMUM 30-MIL (0.76 MM) | | | POLYVINYL BUTYRAL (OR EQUIVALENT) INTERLAYER, WIRED | | | GLASS, LIGHT-TRANSMITTING PLASTIC MATERIALS MEETING THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 2607 , HEAT-STRENGTHENED GLASS | | | OR FULLY TEMPERED GLASS. | | | 2.FOR MULTIPLE-LAYER GLAZING SYSTEMS, EACH LIGHT | | | OR LAYER SHALL CONSIST OF ANY OF THE GLAZING MATERIALS | | | SPECIFIED IN ITEM 1 ABOVE. | | | ANNEALED GLASS IS PERMITTED TO BE USED AS SPECIFIED | | | WITHIN EXCEPTIONS 2 AND 3 OF SECTION 2405.3 . | | | FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR PLASTIC SKYLIGHTS, SEE | | | SECTION 2610 . GLASS-BLOCK CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM | | | TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 2101.2.5 . | | | | | | 8D) THE ENERGY FORMS NEED TO REFLECT THIS OPENING ON | | | THE SOUTH WALL, WITH THE DOORS OPEN, AND WHEN THE DOORS | | | ARE CLOSED | | | THE TYPE OF DOOR ,IT IS NOT A PAPER HONEYCOMB FILLED | | | CORE TYPE OF DOOR!!!!!! | | | NOTE THE FIRST FLOOR DOOR IS ALSO A PAIR OF DOORS NOT A | | | 3'-0" X 7'-0"DOOR. | | | | | | 8E)DETAIL4 SHEET A-3 INDICATES THE NEW OVERHEAD | | | DOORS, PLEASE PROVIDE THE THICKNESS OF THE BEAM BELOW | | | AND THE CLOSENESS OF THE WINDOWS BELOW, FIRST FLOOR | | | WINDOWS. SHEET A-4 INDICATES THE FIRST FLOOR WINDOWS | | | BUT THE TRANSOMS ABOVE THE WINDOWS DO NOT APPEAR. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL DETAIL. PROVIDE COMPLIANCE | | | WITH 704.9 VERTICAL SEPERATION.OF OPENINGS.IF USING | | | EXCEPTION# 2 AGAIN A COMPLETE SET OF FIRE SPRINKLER | | | PLANS FOR THE"BUILDING" WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED FOR | | | THIS EXCEPTION!!!!! | | | | | | 9) GUARDRAILS, THE RESPONCE SHOWS A DETAIL 4/ A-3, THIS | | | NEW DETAIL INDICATES A NEW SLAB DETAIL 1'-0" THICK, NO | | | STEEL INFORMATION, | | | HOW FAR OUT THE SLAB OR HANDRAILPROTRUDE FROM THE | | | BUILDING OR IF THEY ARE OVER THE PROPERTY LINE? | | | 3202.3.2 WINDOWS, BALCONIES, ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES AND | | | MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT. | | | WHERE THE VERTICAL CLEARANCE ABOVE GRADE TO PROJECTING | | | WINDOWS, BALCONIES, ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES OR | | | MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT IS MORE THAN 8 FEET (2438 MM), 1 | | | INCH (25 MM) OF ENCROACHMENT IS PERMITTED FOR EACH | | | ADDITIONAL 1 INCH (25 MM) OF CLEARANCE ABOVE 8 FEET | | | (2438 MM), BUT THE MAXIMUM ENCROACHMENT SHALL BE 4 FEET | | | (1219 MM). | | | | | | 10) 2ND REQUEST, GUARDRAIL DETAIL 4/ A-3 INDICATES A | | | HANDRAIL DETAILIS TO SHOW THE MINIMUM DISTANCE FROM | | | THE EDGE OF SLAB. | | | RESPONCE INDICATES 4" IN LETTER BUT NO COMMENT ON THE | | | PLANS!!! | | | | | | 11) 2ND REQUEST, VERTICAL ACCESSIBLITY BETWEEN SUITE | | | 201 & 202. PLANS INDICATE A LIFT, MUST NOT EMPEDE | | | EGRESS ON STAIRS. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE | | | LIFT.11-4.1.6.(1)(K)(III). | | | 11-4.11 PLATFORM LIFTS (WHEELCHAIR LIFTS). 11-4.11.1 | | | LOCATION. | | | PLATFORM LIFTS (WHEELCHAIR LIFTS) PERMITTED BY SECTION | | | 11-4.1 SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION | | | 11-4.11 . | | | 11-4.11.2 OTHER REQUIREMENTS. | | | IF PLATFORM LIFTS (WHEELCHAIR LIFTS) ARE USED, THEY | | | SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTIONS 11-4.2.4 , 11-4.5 , 11-4.27 | | | , AND ASME A17.1, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS AND | | | ESCALATORS , SECTION XX, 1990. | | | 11-4.11.3 ENTRANCE. | | | IF PLATFORM LIFTS ARE USED THEN THEY SHALL FACILITATE | | | UNASSISTED ENTRY, OPERATION, AND EXIT FROM THE LIFT IN | | | COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 11-4.11.2 . | | | | | | 12)COMPLIED. | | | | | | 13) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 14) THE PLANS ARE NOT CLEAR ON THE HANDRAIL AND LIFT | | | ARE TO COMBINE TO CREATE A OPENING FOR THE LIFT? | | | | | | 15) RESPONCE STATES THE METAL CLAD DOOR (90 MIN RATING) | | | IS TO ONLY BE AESTHETIC VALUE TO THE PROJECT, BUT THE | | | FIELD MEETING | | | INDICATED ON SLOW NIGHTS THIS AREA WILL BE CLOSED OFF, | | | HOW WILL THIS OCCUR? WILL EACH AREA EVER BE OPENED | | | SEPERATELY, | | | SUITE 202 IS CLOSED THERE WILL BE NO VERTICAL MEANS OF | | | EGRESS? | | | | | | 16) POSSIBLY COMPLIED DEPENDING ON COMMENT RESPONCE | | | 15. | | | | | | 17) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 18) 2ND REQUEST,CORRIDOR 110 WILL HAVE ISSUES. THIS | | | MAY TRUELY BE A CORRIDOR OR IT MAY END UP BEING | | | DESIGNED AS A PART OF AN EXIT | | | PASSAGEWAY. IF THE DESIGN IS A CORRIDORTHE ELECTRICAL | | | ROOM DOOR WOULD BE ALLOWED. IF DESIGNED AS PART OF THE | | | EXIT PASSAGE WAY | | | NO ELECTRICAL ROOM DOOR CAN BE IN THIS EXIT. NOTE ALSO | | | FROM THE JOBSITE MEETING THE ELECTRIC ROOM DOOR NEEDS | | | TO SWING OUT OF THE | | | ELECTRICAL ROOM. | | | | | | 19) 2ND REQUEST, HOW MANY STORIES ARE IN THE BUILDING? | | | A 1 HR CORRIDOR IS SHOWN. THE RESPONCE STATES THE AREA | | | WHERE WORK IS TO OCCUR IS TWO STORIES. PLANS INDICATE | | | IN SUITE 202 THE WALL OFTHE MENS RESTROOM THAT BACKS UP | | | TO THE 4 STORY STAIR TOWER DOES SHOW A 1 HR RATING | | | WHERE THERE SHOULD BE A 2 HR RATING . SHAFTS SEE | | | SECTION 707. | | | | | | 20) ELECTRICAL ROOM 108 AS DISCUSSED IN THE JOBSITE | | | MEETING THIS DORR DOES NEED TO BE MOVED BEWARE OF THE | | | DOOR SWINNG AND THE CLEAR SPACE REQUIRED FOR THE | | | CORRIDOR. NOTE ALSO : 008.1.8.8 | | | DURING ITS SWING, ANY DOOR IN A MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL | | | LEAVE UNOBSTRUCTED AT LEAST ONE HALF OF THE REQUIRED | | | WIDTH OF AN AISLE, CORRIDOR, PASSAGEWAY, OR LANDING, | | | NOR PROJECT MORE THAN 7 INCHES (178 MM) INTO THE | | | REQUIRED WIDTH OF AN AISLE, CORRIDOR, PASSAGEWAY OR | | | LANDING, WHEN FULLY OPEN. | | | | | | 21) 2ND REQUEST, PROVIDE INFORMATION IN REGARDS TO EXIT | | | DISCHARGE? RESPONCE EXIT DIRECTION IS NOW SHOWN ON | | | 1/A-1. PLANS DO NOT SHOW THE EXIT AT THE FIRST FLOOR. | | | THE JOB MEETING CLEARLY INDICATES PROBLEM AREAS AT BOTH | | | THE EAST AND WEST EXITS. SEE COMMENT # 3. | | | | | | 22) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 23) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 24) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 25) COMPLIED. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY APPEAR ON THE NEXT REVIEW AS A | | | RESULT TO COMMENT RESPONCE TO THIS REVIEW AND NEW | | | INFORMATION. | | | | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-10-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2006-10-06 |
Time |
16:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2006-10-06 |
Time |
09:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2006-10-06 00:00:00 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | | | | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | | FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | | RESIDENTIAL | | | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | | EXISTING BUILDING CODE | | | FBC*CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 | | | | | | | | | 1.)A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT WILL BE | | | REQUIRED PRIOR TO PERMIT PICKUP, | | | FS713.13. | | | | | | 2.)INCLUDE FBC EB IN GOVERNING CODE. | | | DECLARE LEVEL OF ALTERATION, FBC EB 3. | | | DOES THIS INVOLVE A CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY? | | | IF IT DOES, INCLUDE COMPLIANCE WITH FBC | | | 8. | | | | | | 3.)INCLUDE A CODE SUMMARY ABOUT THE | | | EXISTING BUILDING; (REVISE) BUILDING | | | TYPE FBC6, BUILDING HEIGHT AND AREA | | | FBC5, OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION FBC 3 AND | | | AREA PER OCCUPANCY.OCCUPANCY | | | CLASSIFICATION HAS BEEN DECLARED, A2, | | | FOR THE RENOVATED SPACE, BUT PLEASE | | | PROVIDE INFORMATION IN REGARDS TO THE | | | REST OF THE BUILDING. | | | | | | 4.)SHEET A1 STATES THAT THE BUILDING | | | IS TYPE IV UNPROTECTED.SEE FBC 6, TYPE | | | IV IS HEAVY TIMBER.TO MY KNOWLEDGE | | | THIS IS NOT A HEAVY TIMBER BUILDING. | | | PLEASE REVISE, AND INCLUDE A OR B. | | | | | | 5.)PRODUCT APPROVALS TO BE REVIEWED BY | | | DESIGNER OF RECORD, FBC*106.3.3. | | | | | | 6.)FIRE SPRINKLER PLANS REQUIRED, | | | FBC*106.3.5.1.1(5), FS553.79(2).ALSO | | | SEE ATTACHED LETTER FROM DCA. | | | | | | 7.)A1, OCCUPANT LOAD IS TO BE NOT LESS | | | THAN SPECIFIED IN FBC TABLE 1004.1.2, | | | FBC 1004.1.2 (ROUND UP RATHER THAN ROUND | | | DOWN). | | | | | | 8.)THE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE | | | OVERHEAD DOOR REQUIRES IMPACT PROTECTION | | | FOR THE OPTIONAL GLASS. REMOVABLE | | | SHUTTERS NOT ALLOWED ABOVE THE FIRST | | | FLOOR.SEE ATTACHED POLICY IN REGARDS | | | TO IMPACT PROTECTION.PLEASE CONTACT ME | | | TO DISCUSS AND PLEASE RESOLVE THIS ISSUE | | | PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL. | | | | | | 9.)GUARDRAIL REQUIRED AT THE OVERHEAD | | | DOOR, FBC1012.1. | | | | | | 10.)GUARDRAIL DETAIL, 4-A3, AND | | | HANDRAIL DETAIL, SHOW MINIMUM DISTANCE | | | FROM THE EDGE OF SLAB. | | | | | | 11.)VERTICAL ACCESSIBILITY REQUIRED, | | | FBC11-4.1.6. IT IS NOT CLEAR IF THE | | | ELEVATOR IS DESIGNED TO COMMUNICATE | | | BETWEEN SUITE 201 AND SUITE 202, NOTE ON | | | THE PLAN. | | | | | | 12.)PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE EXISTING | | | STAIR BETWEEN SUITE 201 AND SUITE 202. | | | THE NOTE STATES TO REPAIR AS NECESSARY, | | | PROVIDE A DETAIL. | | | | | | 13.)THE STAIR IS TO COMPLY WITH | | | FBC1009.PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR BOTH | | | STAIRS BETWEEN SUITE 201 AND SUITE 202. | | | | | | 14.)PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE STAIR | | | RAILS.HANDRAILS REQUIRED ON BOTH SIDES | | | OF THE STAIR, FBC1009.11.PROVIDE A | | | DETAIL AND SHOW ALL HANDRAILS ON THE | | | PLAN.SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC1607.7. | | | SEE ALSO FBC11-4.26. | | | | | | 15.)THE NOTE STATES TO REPAIR/REPLACE | | | METAL CLAD DOOR 90 MINUTE (STAIR BETWEEN | | | SUITE 201 AND SUITE 202).A DOOR IS NOT | | | SHOWN GRAPHICALLY, WHAT IS SHOWN THERE | | | ON EACH SIDE OF THE WALL? | | | | | | 16.)LANDINGS REQUIRED AT THE STAIRS, | | | FBC1009.4 AND AT DOORS FBC1008.1.5. | | | NONE IS SHOWN AT THE EXISTING STAIRS TO | | | BE REPAIRED.DOOR LOCATION AND SWING IS | | | NOT CLEAR FROM THE PLAN. | | | | | | 17.)IT APPEARS THAT THERE WAS A WALL | | | BETWEEN SUITE 201 AND SUITE 202, TENANT | | | SEPARATION.A 2 HOUR EXIT ENCLOSURE IS | | | SHOWN.THE PURPOSE OF THE 90 MINUTE | | | DOOR IS NOT CLEAR; IS THIS ONE TENANT | | | SPACE OR TWO? | | | | | | 18.)CORRIDOR 110, SHOW ANY REQUIRED | | | FIRE RATING FOR THIS WALL.20MIN DOORS | | | ARE NOTED ON THE PLAN, DOORS C.NO FIRE | | | RATING SHOWN FOR THE ELECTRICAL 108 | | | DOOR.THIS APPEARS TO BE AN EXIT | | | CORRIDOR; IS THE STAIR SHOWN AN EXIT FOR | | | ANOTHER TENANT SPACE?YOU ARE REMOVING | | | A DOOR AND INCORPORATING A STORAGE AREA | | | INTO THE STAIRWAY, CANNOT USE ANEXIT | | | ENCLOSURE FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE, | | | FBC1019. | | | | | | 19.)HOW MANY STORIES IS THIS BUILDING? | | | A 1 HOUR CORRIDOR WALL IS SHOWN, NO | | | OTHER RATING SHOWN FOR THE STAIRS | | | ADJACENT TO ELECTRICAL 108.2 HOUR | | | REQUIRED FOR FOUR STORIES OR MORE, | | | FBC1019. | | | | | | 20.)PROVIDE DIMENSIONS THE ELECTRICAL | | | 108 DOOR.IT APPEARS CODE COMPLIANT | | | WHEN SCALED; SEE FBC1005.2 AND SHOW | | | COMPLIANCE ON THE PLAN. | | | | | | 21.)PROVIDE INFORMATION IN REGARDS TO | | | EXIT DISCHARGE; NONE SHOWN ON THE PLAN. | | | | | | | | | 22.)THERE ARE FOUR ITEMS SHOWN | | | GRAPHICALLY ON THE PLAN AS RECTANGLES | | | WITH AN X.TWO APPEAR TO BE ELEVATORS | | | (AS THEY ARE LOCATED IN THE ELEVATOR | | | LOBBY); WHAT ARE OTHER TWO? | | | | | | 23.)PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR SIGNAGE FOR | | | THE ELEVATORS, FBC11-4.10. | | | | | | 24.)A WALL IS BEING REMOVED; DOES THIS | | | WALL SERVE AS A TENANT AND/OR OCCUPANCY | | | SEPARATION?THERE IS ALSO A STAIR FROM | | | SUITE 202 GOING DOWNSTAIRS.WHAT IS IN | | | THE AREA BELOW?IS IT A PART OF THIS | | | SPACE OR IS IT ANOTHER TENANT SPACE? | | | | | | 25.)SEE FBC11-5.2 REGARDING COUNTERS | | | EXCEEDING 34INCHES, SHOW ACCESSIBLE | | | SEATING ON THE PLAN (BARS 1, 2, AND 3). | | | | | | 26.)A RESPONSE LETTER WHEN | | | RESUBMITTING WILL HELP EXPEDITE PLAN | | | REVIEW.ALL CHANGES TO THE PLAN ARE TO | | | BE CLOUDED. | | | | | | 27.)SIGN THE OWNER/AGENT LINE OF THE | | | ENERGY CALC. | | | | | | 28.)PROVIDE WIND DESIGN CRITERIA, | | | FBC1603.1.4. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
13 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-12-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-12-26 |
Time |
09:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-12-26 |
Time |
09:33 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-26 09:34:11 | ** NOTED** | | | | | | 1) NOTE: REVISED FLA COM B NOW HAS REMOVED ALL | | | COMPONENTS OTHER THAN ELECTRICAL LIGHTING COMPLIANCE. | | | NO OTHER SYSTEMS ON CALCULATIONS AS THE BUILDING DOES | | | NOT FALL UNDER THE DEFINITION OF A RENOVATION. | | | PRESCRIPTIVE PER TABLE B, AND OCCUPANCY WAS REVISED. | | | | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS PLEASE CALL. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
12 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-12-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-12-18 |
Time |
13:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-12-18 |
Time |
13:45 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-18 13:46:12 | ** DENIED/PASSED REVIEW OF REVISIONS** | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT REVISED LIGHTING PERFORMANCE | | | CALCULATIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH FBC | | | 13-415.2,13-415.2.ABC.1.1,.1.2. SAME NOTE AS PREVIOUS | | | REVIEW. PLEASE SEE TABLES 13-415.2.B (PRESCRIPTIVE) | | | 13-415.2.C (PRESCRIPTIVE) | | | PLEASE SEE13-400.0.C.4 FOR RENOVATED BUILDINGS. | | | RENOVATED BUILDINGS SHALL, WHEN APPLICABLE (SEE SECTION | | | 202), MEET THE EFFICIENCIES LISTED ON FORM 400C FOR | | | COMPONENTS BEING CHANGED OR SHALL COMPLY WITH THE | | | ENVELOPE OR SYSTEMS CRITERIA IN METHOD B OF FLA/COM FOR | | | THE COMPONENTS BEING CHANGED. EXISTING BUILDINGS NOT | | | MEETING THE DEFINITION OF A RENOVATION IN WHICH NEW | | | HEATING, COOLING, WATER HEATING, ELECTRICAL OR LIGHTING | | | SYSTEMS ARE INSTALLED SHALL MEET THE BASIC PRESCRIPTIVE | | | MINIMUM EFFICIENCIES LISTED IN THIS CODE FOR THE | | | SYSTEM(S) BEING CHANGED. | | | THE SECTION 202 REFERENCE IS FOR 30% OR MORE OF THE | | | BUILDING. AS THE SCOPE OF WORK DOES NOT MEET THIS | | | PLEASE MEET PRESCRIPTIVE AS STATED. | | | THE PREVIOUS METHOD B FLA-COM WAS GIVEN BACK AS N/A. | | | THE TYPE IS ALSO SHOWN AS RETAIL WHICH THIS SPACE IS | | | NOT. PLEASE SEE TABLE B, TABLE C FOR USE. | | | | | | ** A CALL WAS PLACED AND A MESSAGE WAS LEFT ON THE | | | ANSWERING MACHINE OF THE ENGINEER. | | | | | | ** SEE PREVIOUS NOTES WHICH WERE THE SAME. ONCE | | | CALCULATIONS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED THE REVIEW OF PLANS | | | AND CALCULATIONS WILL BE COORDINATED. REVIEW WILL THEN | | | GO INTO A FINAL PASSED STATUS WITHOUT ANY OUTSTANDING | | | COMMENTS. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT | | | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
11 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-11-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-11-24 |
Time |
15:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-11-24 |
Time |
15:28 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-11-24 15:28:49 | ** REVISION FAILED ** | | | | | | | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT UPDATED FIXTURE LEGEND FOR FINAL | | | FIXTURES. PLEASE SUBMIT UPDATED REVISED LIGHTING | | | PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS BASED ON TABLES *B* OR *C* | | | WITH EXCEPTIONS. | | | 13-415.2,13-415.2.B, 13-415.2.C | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | **IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP | | | FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE | | | ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. | | | DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC. SHOULD BE PLACED | | | INTO TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID | | | ANY DELAYS. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT | | | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
10 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-08-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-08-01 |
Time |
10:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-08-01 |
Time |
10:50 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-08-01 10:52:00 | LIGHTING SHOWN ON FLA COM B ONLY FOR PERFORMANCE FOR | | | 13-415.2 AS THE DEFININTION DOES NOT MEET RENOVATION OF | | | BUILDING PER 13-101.1. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
9 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-07-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-07-30 |
Time |
09:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-30 09:43:03 | PLANS TEMP FAILED AS THE PREVIOUS ELECTRICLA REVISIONS | | | NEED TO COME BACK INTO OFFICE SO THE CALCULATIONS MAY | | | BE COMPARED TO THE PLANS. | | | CALLED JOHN SATEU AND LEFT MESSAGE. CALCS ARE UNDER "C" | | | (LARGE BINS ON HOLD. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
8 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-07-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-07-03 |
Time |
13:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-07-03 |
Time |
13:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-03 13:26:05 | ** DENIED ** | | | | | | 1) NOTE: ELECTRICAL PLANS ARE OK, HOWEVER THE PREVIOUS | | | REVISED ENERGY CALCULATIONS WERE NOT IN SETS OR | | | ATTACHED TO PLANS. CALLED AND SPOKE TO CONTRACTOR. | | | WILL NEED REVISED CALCULATIONS TO BE SUBMITTED AT A | | | LATER DATE. | | | | | | | | | ** IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP FOR | | | CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED SHEETS | | | INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. DO NOT | | | LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO | | | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID ANY | | | DELAYS. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-06-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-06-03 |
Time |
14:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-06-03 |
Time |
14:29 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-03 14:32:58 | **DENIED ** | | | | | | 1) NOTE:PREVIOUS ELECTRICAL PLANS WERE BROUGHT BACK AND | | | RETIANED ELECTRICLA COPY FOR FILE SET. | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED STILL | | | DO NOT CONTAIN ANY SIGNATURE BY OWNER AGENT AS | | | PREVIOUSLY NOTED. | | | PLEASE BE SURE ALL BUILDING COMPONENTS COORDINATE WITH | | | AND SUBMITTED REVISED CALCULATIONS BEFORE FINALS. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL. | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-03-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-03-24 |
Time |
16:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-03-24 |
Time |
16:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-03-24 16:50:44 | ** DENIEDREVIEW ** | | | | | | | | | 1) NOTE:REVISED ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE UNDER | | | INCORRECT VERSION AS ADOPTED UNDER CODE IN AFFECT AT | | | TIME OF PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | PLEASE SEE 13-400.3.B BEFORE THE 2006 REVISIONS TO THE | | | 2004 FBC. (VERSION 2.11). | | | ** PLEASE ALSO BE SURE THE ENGINEER SIGNS AND SEALS THE | | | CERTIFICATION SHEET AND THE OWNER AGENT SIGNATURE IS ON | | | THESE SAME SHEETS. | | | | | | ** PLEASE NOTE: THE ELECTRICAL PLANS ARE OK AND HAVE | | | BEEN STAMPED. PLEASE BE SURE TO BRING BACK STAMPED | | | ELECTRICAL SHEETS WHEN RESUBMITTING. | | | | | | ** THIS OFFICE EXPRESSES THAT IF THERE ARE ANY | | | COMMENTS, QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION NEEDED TO PLEASE | | | DO NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE. | | | PLEASE SEE BELOW FOR CONTACT INFORMATION. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-12-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-12-03 |
Time |
18:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-12-03 |
Time |
18:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-12-03 18:51:33 | SCOPE OF WORK CHANGED, DELETED NIGHT CLUB AREA ON THE | | | 2ND FLR WEST SIDE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-09-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-09-15 |
Time |
08:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-09-15 |
Time |
08:05 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-09-15 08:07:24 | 2007-09-15 08:07:24 | | | | | | PLANS STAMPED,BOTH NORTH STAIR TOWERS AREUNDER | | | SEPARATE PERMIT FOR EGRESS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF | | | BUILDING. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-06-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-06-20 |
Time |
20:23 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-06-19 |
Time |
19:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-06-20 20:23:51 | 2007-06-20 20:23:51 | | | | | | ** HOLD REMOVED** | | | | | | *** UNSAT 3RD REVIEW *** | | | | | | ** PLEASE SEE SOME COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW ARE | | | STILL IN NEED OF ADDRESSING. | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE COMPLIANCE WITH THE 2004 FBC | | | CHAPTER 13 HAS NOT BEEN ACHIEVED ON PLANS FOR CODE | | | COMPLIANCE. PLEASE SEE PLANS NOW INDICATE LIGHTING | | | CONTROLS THROUGH-OUT BUILD OUT HOWEVER NO TIMES ON | | | DEVICES IS NOTED OR SHOWN. PLEASE SEE THE TYPE OF | | | DEVICES AS LISTED DOES NOT SHOW UP ON THE MANUFACTURES | | | WEBSITE FOR THE DEVICE AS LISTED ON LEGEND. NO | | | INFORMATION COULD BE LOCATED ON THESE. PLEASE SEE THE | | | COMPLETE LIST OF DEVICES PRINTED OUT ON ATTACHED SHEETS | | | FROM MANUFACTURE WHICH DOES NOT COORDINATE WITH THE | | | DEVICES AS NOTED. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON DEVICES | | | AS NOTED. | | | PLEASE SEE NO COVERAGE FOR CONTROL OF EGRESS LIGHTING | | | FROM SECOND FLOOR. SEE ELECTRICAL COMMENT WITH RESPECT | | | TO THE LIFE SAFETY METHODS OF CONTROL REQUIRED. PLEASE | | | SEE THE AREAS WHICH THESE DEVICES ARE BEING PLACED IN | | | MANY LOCATIONS ARE IN QUESTION. PLEASE SEE BATHROOMS AS | | | SEPARATE SPACES MAY NOT HAVE THE COVERAGE NEEDED. MORE | | | INFORMATION ON TYPES OF DEVICES AND MAXIMUM TIMES ON | | | ARE NEEDED. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE DETAIL FOR EMERGENCY/EXIT LIGHTING AS | | | THESE ARE SHOWN ON THE SAME CONTROL OF DIMMERS OR | | | SWITCHES. NOTE OR DETAIL THESE ON THE HOT/LINE SIDE OF | | | THESE CONTROLS. | | | PLEASE SEE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS THE FIXTURES, | | | TYPES, AND WATTAGE DO NOT CORRELATE WITH PLANS AND | | | FIXTURE LEGEND. | | | PLEASE SEE 13-415.1.ABC.1.1,.1.2, 13-415.1.AB.1.1. | | | **PLEASE SEE THE OWNER AGENT IS NOT SIGNED ON ENERGY | | | CALCULATION SHEETS AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS WHICH | | | REQUESTED PHOTO-METRICS FOR ALL EGRESS PATHS BASED ON | | | NEW CHANGE IN OCCUPANCY. PLEASE SEE THERE ARE STILL | | | STAIR AREAS WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN ANY LIGHTING | | | PHOTO-METRICS. THESE HAVE BEEN REDLINED ON PLANS. | | | PLEASE SEE E-5 WHERE THE DETAILS ON THE LOWER RIGHT | | | HAND SIDE SHOW BOTH DETAILS AS ENTRY STAIRS NORMAL? | | | PLEASE SEE AREA WHICH EXITS INTO THE EXISTING AREA | | | WHICH IS SHOWING OCCUPANCY TYPE DEVICES LOCATED AT THE | | | UPPER LEVEL HOWEVER NOT METHOD OF CONTROL FOR THE | | | LIGHTING ON STAIRS FROM LOWER LEVEL OR IN STAIR AREA. | | | PLEASE SEE NFPA-101 7.8.1.3, 7.9.2.2, 7.8.1.2.2, FBC | | | CHAPTER 10, 1006.1.2. | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE REVISED RISER WHICH INDICATES | | | THE SAME CONDUCTORS BEING TAPPED FROM GUTTER TO THE NEW | | | MAIN WHICH ARE BEING SHOWN AS RATED 800AMPS INTO A NEW | | | 600AMP MAIN? PLEASE CLARIFY THE SIZES INTO THIS MAIN | | | AND REVISE CONDUCTORS AT THIS TIME IF NEED. THE LARGER | | | CONDUCTORS ARE NOT A CODE VIOLATION BUT MAY NOT FIT. | | | PLEASE ALSO CLARIFY THE EXISTING SERVICE ENTRANCE | | | CONDUCTOR SIZES FROM OUTSIDE INTO GUTTER. | | | 310.16, 240.4 | | | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS WITH | | | RESPECT TO MINIMUM HEAD ROOM CLEARANCE FOR DETAIL SHOWN | | | ON E-5 FOR STAIRWAY. DETAIL SHOWS 76 INCHES WHICH DOES | | | NOT SEEM TO MEET BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE PLANS INDICATE NEW SUITE | | | NUMBERS FOR NEW TENANT SPACES HOWEVER THIS IS ACTUALLY | | | BEING MADE AND ADDED INTO THE SAME EXISTING TENANT | | | SPACE AS THE FIRST FLOOR SUITE 104. NEW EXTENSIONS FOR | | | ADDRESS WAS GIVEN AND TITLE BLOCKS INDICATE THIS AS | | | SEPARATE TENANT SPACES, HOWEVER THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE | | | WHEN THERE IS NO TENANT SEPARATION FROM THE FIRST FLOOR | | | EXISTING TENANT AREA. | | | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE VALUATION WAS INCREASED AND | | | ADDITIONAL FEES ARE OWED. | | | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW A NOTICE WAS GIVEN | | | WITH RESPECT TO CODE COMPLIANT COMMENTS BEING REPEATED | | | PER FS 553.80(2)(B). PLANS ARE BEING RETAINED AND THE | | | PLANS, ENERGY CALCULATIONS, AND REVIEW NOTES WILL BE | | | GONE OVER AS CODE COMPLIANCE HAS NOT BEEN MET FOR THE | | | THIRD REVIEW. PENDING PIER REVIEW A 4X FEE FOR THE PLAN | | | REVIEW PORTION OF THE PERMIT FEE MAY BE ASSESSED TO THE | | | DESIGNER OF RECORD AS REQUIRED BY THE FLORIDA | | | STATUTES. | | | | | | THIS FEE HAS NOT YET BEEN ASSESSED AND IT NOT THE | | | RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER OR CONTRACTOR OF RECORD. | | | | | | ** AS STATED ON ALL PREVIOUS REVIEWS, PLEASE CALL TO GO | | | OVER ANY COMMENTS, IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR IF THE | | | COMMENTS AS TYPED ARE NOT UNDERSTOOD. | | | | | | | | | * ** IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE | | | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE | | | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED | | | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW | | | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED | | | FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND | | | AVOID ANY DELAYS. | | | | | | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF | | | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, | | | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO | | | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS | | | REVIEWER. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | ** PLEASE SEE ANY POSSIBLE COMMENTS FROM OTHER TRADES | | | WHICH MAY AFFECT ELECTRICAL PLANS. | | 2007-06-20 09:29:36 | 2007-06-20 09:29:36 | | | ** ON HOLD ** | | | | | | A MESSAGE WAS LEFT ON VOICE MAIL OF MR. JOHN SATEU OF | | | CASTLE CONSTRUCTION FOR UPDATED VALUATION TO BE GIVEN | | | BEFORE REVIEW CAN BE DONE. | | | THIS WAS REQUESTED ON TWO PREVIOUS REVIEWS AND NO | | | INFORMATION AND/OR CHANGES WERE MADE TO PERMIT | | | APPLICATION.PLEASE SEE FBC 108.3 VALUE SHALL INCLUDE | | | ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, DESIGN ARCHITECT AND | | | ENGINEERING COSTS EVEN IF ANY OF THIS IS OWNER | | | SUPPLIED. | | | PLANS ARE ON HOLD IN ELECTRICAL FOR REVIEW. | | | IF A VALUE IS NOT PROVIDED, ONE WILL BE ASSESSED BASED | | | ON PLANS AND VALUATION TABLES IN THE FBC AND ADOPTED | | | REFERENCES FOR VALUATION GUIDES. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE IN | | | CONTACTING THIS OFFICE. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH. | | | 561-805-6717 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-12-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2006-12-23 |
Time |
13:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2006-12-21 |
Time |
20:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2006-12-23 13:17:47 | ** UNSAT 2ND REVIEW ** | | | | | | ** A FIELD MEETING WITH THE CONTRACTOR/ARCHITECT SHALL | | | BE SCHEDULE AT THE EARLIEST POSSIBLE TIME TO VISIT | | | SITE. THERE ARE SOME AREAS OF CONCERN WITH THE CREATION | | | ONE NEW SPACE AND ADJOINING THE EXISTING SPACE TO | | | BUILDING ADJACENT. | | | | | | THERE MAY ALSO BE ELECTRICAL COMMENTS TO FOLLOW AFTER | | | FIELD MEETING IS HELD. | | | PLEASE CONTACT THIS OFFICE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE TO SET | | | UP A TIME. IF POSSIBLE BEFORE THE NEW YEAR. 26TH -28TH | | | OF DECEMBER. THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW OF SAID PLANS | | | AND TO CLERIFY ITEMS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. | | | | | | ** PLEASE SEE NOTES BELOW ARE TAKEN DIRECTLY FROM THE | | | PREVIOUS REVIEW WITH A NO OR OK FOR THE SAME NUMERICAL | | | DESIGNATION AS PREVIOUS REVIEW. PLEASE SEE SOME MAY | | | CONTAIN A NO/OK, AS PART OF A COMMENT MAY HAVE BEEN | | | ADDRESSED HOWEVER NOT FULLY. | | | | | | ** PLEASE SEE ANY NEW COMMENTS BASED ON PLANS SUBMITTED | | | MAY BE AT THE END OF THE PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTES. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1) NOTE: OK. | | | | | | 2) NOTE: NO. PLEASE KNOW BASED ON WORK AS SHOWN AND | | | WILL BE REQUIRED THE VALUE IS SUBSTANTIALLY LOW AND ONE | | | WILL BE ASSESSED IF NOT ADJUSTED. | | | | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** | | | PLEASE SEE VALUE FOR COMPLETE SCOPE OF WORK SHALL BE | | | BASED ON ALL LABOR AND MATERIALS EVEN IF ANY MATERIALS | | | ARE OWNER SUPPLIED. PLEASE KNOW, WHEN A VALUE IS LOW, | | | ONE WILL BE ASSESSED PER FBC 108.3 USING THE | | | MARSHALL'S& SWIFT | | | GUIDE AS ADOPTED BY THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | 3) NOTE:NO, PLEASE SEE THE OVERVIEW FOR THE CONDUITS | | | BEING ENCASED DOES NOT PROVIDE THE DETAIL AS NEED FOR | | | ALL CLEARANCES ETC. | | | | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** | | | PLEASE SEE BUILDING REVIEW NOTES AS 2ND FLOOR GARAGE | | | DOOR. | | | PLEASE SEE EXIT STAIRS MENTIONS TO ENCASED CONDUIT | | | COMING IN THROUGH STAIRS, MUST PROVIDE COMPLETE | | | ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL FOR DEPTH, DISTANCES, HEADROOM | | | ETC. | | | PLEASE ALSO SEE NO MORE THAN 8' OF UNDER PROTECTED | | | CONDUCTORS ARE PERMITTED INSIDE THE BUILDING. THIS MAY | | | ALSO INCLUDE ENCASEMENT OF CONDUITS IN MAIN ELECTRICAL | | | ROOM. | | | PLEASE SEE 230.70, 240.6 | | | | | | 4) NOTE: NO, PLEASE KNOW AT THIS TIME THE NEW PROPOSED | | | SERVICE IS NOT GRANTED BY SPECIAL PERMISSION AS | | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** | | | PLEASE PROVIDE SIZES AND VOLTAGES FOR ALL EXISTING | | | SERVICES. | | | PLEASE SEE 230.2 AS AT THIS TIME THIS NEW SERVICE IS | | | NOT GRANTED. AS PLANS SHOW, THIS SEEMS BE ADDING | | | ADDITIONAL SERVICES WHERE NOT ALL INFORMATION IS | | | PROVIDED TO POSSIBLY GRANT ANY SPECIAL PERMISSION. | | | | | | 5) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE ENERGY CALCULATIONS STILL | | | INDICATE MANUAL CONTROLS. | | | PLEASE SEE NO SYSTEM IS BEING SHOWN IN DETAIL. | | | PLEASE SEE NO TIMES FOR SCHEDULING. | | | PLEASE SEE NO TIMES ON OVER RIDE DEVICES REQUIRED. | | | PLEASE SEE NO DEVICES LOCATED IN SEPARATE SPACES. | | | PLEASE SEE SECTIONS AS GIVEN IN PREVIOUS REVIEW. | | | | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** | | | PLEASE SEE FBC CHAPTER 13, 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2, | | | .1.3,. | | | PLEASE SEE 13-415.1.B, 13-415.2, | | | 13-415.2.ABC.1, TABLES 415.2.C.1, | | | 415.2. B.1 | | | PLEASE COMPLY WITH THIS. | | | | | | 6) NOTE: OK/NO, PLEASE SEE ADDRESSING ON SOME SHEETS DO | | | NOT CORRELATE. | | | PLEASE SEE E-4. | | | | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** | | | PLEASE INDICATE ALL SUITE NUMBERS ON TITLE BLOCKS ON | | | PLANS AS REQUIRED ON ALL SHEETS. | | | FAC 61G1-16.004, 61G15-23.002 | | | | | | 7) NOTE: NO, NO INFORMATION SHOWN. | | | | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** | | | PLEASE SEE NFPA-101 7.8.1.3, 7.9.2.2, AS A MIN OF 10FT | | | CANDLES IS REQUIRED UNDER NORMAL AND 1FT CANDLE MIN | | | UNDER EM PWR. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE LIGHTING LEVELS. | | | | | | 8) NOTE:NO/OK, SOME SHOWN, HOWEVER AS LIGHTING LEVELS | | | HAVE NOT BEEN PROVIDED ADDITIONAL FIXTURES MAY BE | | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** | | | ALONG WITH NOTE #7 ABOVE PLEASE INDICATE ALL EXISTING | | | OTHER EMERGENCY LIGHTING AND EXIT LIGHTING AS THIS | | | SPACE IS BEING INTRODUCED INTO THE 2ND FLR AND IF | | | EXISTING DOES NOT MEET CODE, THEN THEY WILL BE | | | REQUIRED. | | | LS 101 7.8, 7.9, 700.12E. | | | | | | 9) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE ONLY TWO ITEMS ON ONE PANEL ARE | | | BEING NOTED FOR THIS. PLEASE SEE ALL CONTINUOUS SHALL | | | BE INDICATED AS SUCH. | | | | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** | | | PLEASE INDICATE ALL CONTINUOUS LOADS AT 125% 215.3, | | | 230.42 ETC. | | | | | | 10) NOTE: NO, PLEASE KNOW BASED ON THE LAYOUT FOR | | | SPACES AND WHICH TENANT IS WHICH AND REQUIRED | | | SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS, THERE MAY BE OTHER ELECTRICAL | | | WHICH WILL NEED TO BE SHOWN. PLEASE KNOW BASED ON SITE | | | MEETING AND NOTES ABOVE, THE SERVICE AND EQUIPMENT AS | | | SHOWN IS NOT YET GRANTED OR APPROVED FOR REVIEW. | | | | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** | | | PLEASE INDICATE ALL ELECTRICAL PANELS ON POWER PLANS. | | | | | | 11) NOTE: OK. | | | | | | 12) NOTE: NO/OK. SOME ITEMS CAN NOT BE VERIFIED FOR | | | CODE COMPLIANCE AT THIS TIME. PLEASE KNOW SINCE NOTED | | | ABOVE FOR A REQUIRED SITE MEETING THERE MAY BE CHANGES | | | WHICH WILL AFFECT THE ELECTRICAL PLANS AS SHOWN. | | | | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE** | | | PLEASE SEE BLDG REVIEW COMMENTS AS DOOR FROM MAIN | | | ELECTRICAL ROOM IS SHOWN IMPEDING THE EGRESS OF | | | OCCUPANTS. PLEASE SEE THE DOOR REQUIREMENTS MAY | | | CHANGE. | | | | | | 13) NOTE: NO. SAME NOTE. | | | | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** | | | PLEASE SEE PANEL SCHEDULE SHALL BE SPECIFIC TO ROOMS | | | AND AREAS IN WHICH LTS AND RECEPTS FEEDS. IE; BATH LTS, | | | POOL AREA ETC. | | | ** IT IS KNOWN, THAT THESE WILL MOST LIKELY CHANGE | | | DURING THE CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | ** NEW NOTE ** | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE INDICATE ALL LIGHTING AND SOUND LEVELS | | | FOR FIRE HORN AND STROBE DEVICES. PLEASE SEE FBC | | | 11-4.28.1, .2, .3(4). THIS HAS NOW BECOME A REQUIREMENT | | | FOR ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW. | | | PLEASE INDICATE BASE REQUIRED SYSTEM AND SUBMIT PLANS. | | | FBC 106.3.5.1.1 ADMIN SECTION | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW DUE TO SOME AREAS OF CONCERN ON | | | PLANS NOT YET CLEAR FOR REVIEW, THERE MAY BE FURTHER | | | COMMENTS. | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FLORIDA STATUTES 553.80(2)(B) WITH | | | RESPECT TO REPEAT COMMENTS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. | | | | | | * ** IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE | | | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE | | | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED | | | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW | | | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED | | | FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND | | | AVOID ANY DELAYS. | | | | | | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF | | | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, | | | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO | | | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS | | | REVIEWER. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | 2006-12-21 20:48:00 | IN ELEC FOR REVIEW |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-09-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2006-09-29 |
Time |
19:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2006-09-29 |
Time |
11:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2006-09-29 00:00:00 | *** UNSAT *** | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING | | | RELEVANT CODES IN EFFECT SHALL BE STATED | | | ON PLANS. | | | 2002 NFPA-70(NEC), 2002 NFPA-72, 2003 | | | NFPA-101 AND 2004 FBC. | | | | | | | | | 2)PLEASE SEE VALUE FOR COMPLETE SCOPE OF | | | WORK SHALL BE BASED ON ALL LABOUR AND | | | MATERIALS EVEN IF ANY MATERIALS ARE | | | OWNER SUPPLIED. PLEASE KNOW, WHEN A | | | VALUE IS LOW, ONE WILL BE ASSESSED PER | | | FBC 108.3 USING THE MARSHALL'S& SWIFT | | | GUIDE AS ADOPTED BY THE FLORIDA BUILDING | | | CODE. | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE BUILDING REVIEW | | | NOTES AS 2ND FLR GARAGE DOOR. | | | PLEASE SEE EXIT STAIRS MENTIONS TO | | | ENCASED CONDUIT COMING IN THROUGH | | | STAIRS, MUST PROVIDE COMPLETE | | | ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL FOR DEPTH, | | | DISTANCES, HEADROOM ETC ETC. | | | PLEASE ALSO SEE NO MORE THAN 8' OF UNDER | | | PROTECTED CONDUCTORS ARE PERMITTED | | | INSIDE THE BUILDING. THIS MAY ALSO | | | INCLUDE ENCASEMENT OF CONDUITS IN MAIN | | | ELECTRICAL ROOM. | | | PLEASE SEE 230.70, 240.6 | | | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE SIZES AND | | | VOLTAGES FOR ALL EXISTING SERVICES. | | | PLEASE SEE 230.2 AS AT THIS TIME THIS | | | NEW SERVICE IS NOT GRANTED. AS PLANS | | | SHOW, THIS SEEMS BE ADDING ADDITIONAL | | | SERVICES WHERE NOT ALL INFORMATION IS | | | PROVIDED TO POSSIBLY GRANT ANY SPECIAL PERMISSION. | | | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FBC CHAPTER 13, 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, | | | .1.2, .1.3,. | | | PLEASE SEE 13-415.1.B, 13-415.2, | | | 13-415.2.ABC.1, TABLES 415.2.C.1, | | | 415.2.B.1 | | | PLEASE COMPLY WITH THIS. | | | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE INDICATE ALL SUITE | | | NUMBERS ON TITLE BLOCKS ON PLANS AS | | | REQUIRED ON ALL SHEETS. | | | FAC 61G1-16.004, 61G15-23.002 | | | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NFPA-101 7.8.1.3, | | | 7.9.2.2, AS A MIN OF 10FT CANDLES IS | | | REQUIRED UNDER NORMAL AND 1FT CANDLE MIN | | | UNDER EM PWR. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE LIGHTING LEVELS. | | | | | | 8)NOTE: ALONG WITH NOTE #7 ABOVE PLEASE | | | INDICATE ALL EXISTING OTHER EMERGENCY | | | LIGHTING AND EXIT LIGHTING AS THIS SPACE | | | IS BEING INTRODUCED INTO THE 2ND FLR AND | | | IF EXISTING DOES NOT MEET CODE , THEN | | | THEY WILL BE REQUIRED. | | | LS 101 7.8, 7.9, 700.12E. | | | | | | 9) NOTE: PLEASE INDICATE ALL CONTINUOUS | | | LOADS AT 125% 215.3, 230.42 ETC. | | | | | | 10) NOTE: PLEASE INDICATE ALL | | | ELECTRICAL PANELS ON POWER PLANS. | | | | | | 11) NOTE: PLEASE CLARIFY LIGHTING FOR | | | MAIN ELECTRICAL ROOM. IS THIS ROOM ON | | | THE FIRST FLR? PLEASE KNOW, IF AN EM | | | BACK UP LT IS NOT EIXSITING, ONE WILL BE | | | REQUIRED FOR LIFE SAFTEY AND FIRE DEPT | | | PERSONEL. | | | LS101 7.8, 7.9, 700.12E. | | | | | | 12) NOTE: PLEASE SEE BLDG REVIEW | | | COMMENTS AS DOOR FROM MAIN ELECTRICAL | | | ROOM IS SHOWN IMPEDING THE EGRESS OF | | | OCCUPANTS. PLEASE SEE THE DOOR | | | REQUIREMENTS MAY CHANGE. | | | | | | 13) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PANEL SCHEDULE | | | SHALL BE SPECIFIC TO ROOMS AND AREAS IN | | | WHICH LTS AND RECEPTS FEED. | | | IE; BATH LTS, POOL AREA ETC. | | | ** IT IS KNOWN, THAT THESE WILL MOST | | | LIKELY CHANGE DURING THE CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | ** IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE | | | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE | | | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED | | | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW | | | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED | | | FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND | | | AVOID ANY DELAYS. | | | | | | PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMATION FOR | | | REVIEW. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS, | | | PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CALL. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
10 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-07-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2009-07-28 |
Time |
11:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2009-07-28 |
Time |
11:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-07-28 11:05:27 | REVISION D & E FOR SHEETS A-1, A-3, A-4 & A-5. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
9 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-02-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2009-02-17 |
Time |
15:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2009-02-17 |
Time |
15:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-02-17 15:30:45 | ***DENIED*** | | | | | | 1) PLEASE PROVIDE PRESCRIPTIVE STRENGTH REQUIREMENT FOR | | | HANDRAILS AND GUARDRAILS. | | | | | | 2) SEE BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS REGARDING FS | | | REQUIREMENTS FOR PLANS. | | | | | | | | | MIKE WENNERGREN, ASST. FIRE MARSHAL | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | FIRE PREVENTION (561) 804-4756 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
8 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-07-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2008-07-11 |
Time |
13:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2008-07-11 |
Time |
13:35 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-11 13:36:07 | REVISION C DATED 5/12/08 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-06-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-06-02 |
Time |
14:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-06-02 |
Time |
13:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-02 14:08:15 | *****REVSION #B, DATED 4/15/08, APPROVED***** | | | | | | REVISED PLAN SHEET A-4 STAMPED, INITIALED, AND DATED. | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-04-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-04-23 |
Time |
14:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-04-16 |
Time |
15:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-04-23 13:33:53 | *****UNSAT***** | | | | | | 1.WHERE IS THE REVISION (AS INDICATED BY CLOUDING) | | | FOR THE LIFE SAFETY PLAN (SHEET A-4) ? | | | | | | 2.THE APPROPIATE REVISED PLAN SHEETS TO BE | | | FIRE-STAMPED WHEN THE OTHER PLAN REVIEWERS HAVE BEEN | | | SATISFIED. | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-12-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-12-26 |
Time |
17:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-12-26 |
Time |
16:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-12-26 17:01:14 | ***** REVISION APPROVED***** | | | | | | | | | REVISED PLAN SHEETS E-2 AND FP-2 WERE STAMPED, | | | INITIALED, AND DATED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-10-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-10-23 |
Time |
09:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-10-23 |
Time |
09:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-10-23 09:44:00 | *****APPROVED***** | | | | | | | | | PLAN SHEETS A-5, E-2, E-4, FP-1, AND FP-2 WERE STAMPED, | | | INITIALED, AND DATED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-07-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2007-07-24 |
Time |
09:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2007-07-24 |
Time |
09:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-07-24 10:48:38 | ***DENIED*** | | | | | | 1) OK | | | | | | 2) OK | | | | | | 3) OK | | | | | | 4) OK | | | | | | 5) OK | | | | | | 6) OK | | | | | | 7) OK | | | | | | 8) OK | | | | | | 9) OK | | | | | | 10) PLEASE NOTE THAT ONLY ELECTRICAL CONDUIT THAT | | | SERVES THAT PARTICULAR STAIRWAY WOULD BE ALLOWED WITHIN | | | THE EXIT ENCLOSURE. | | | | | | 11) OK | | | | | | 12) OK | | | | | | 13) OK | | | | | | 14) OK | | | | | | 15) OK | | | | | | 16) OK | | | | | | 17) OK | | | | | | 18) OK | | | | | | 19) OK | | | | | | NEW COMMENT: | | | | | | 1) THE MINIMUM HEADROOM REQUIREMENT FOR NEW AND | | | EXISTING STAIRS IS EIGHTY (80") IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA | | | 101. | | | | | | | | | MIKE WENNERGREN, ASSISTANT FIRE MARSHAL | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | FIRE PREVENTION (561) 804-4756 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-12-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2006-12-29 |
Time |
15:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2006-12-29 |
Time |
15:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2006-12-29 15:36:59 | *****DENIED***** | | | | | | | | | INCOMPLETE RESPONSE SHEET TO FIRE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS | | | OF 10-20-2006.TO EXPEDITE THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING, INCLUDE A RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING | | | HOW/WHERE EACH ITEM WAS ADDRESSED. | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-10-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2006-10-20 |
Time |
12:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2006-10-20 |
Time |
12:39 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-10-20 13:08:19 | ***DENIED*** | | | | | | 1) LIFE SAFETY SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 101, 2003 | | | EDITION. | | | | | | 2) KNOX BOX APPLICATIONS MAY BE OBTAINED AT THE BUREAU | | | OF FIRE PREVENTION, (561) 804-4724. | | | | | | 3) FIRE EXTINGUISHERS SHALL BE 2A-10B,C RATED AND | | | MOUNTED MOUNTED NOT TO EXCEED 75' TRAVEL DISTANCE. | | | | | | 4) CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATION AND DEMOLITION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. | | | | | | 5) ALL EXIT DOORS AND DOORS THAT ARE PART OF THE | | | REQUIRED MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL SWING IN THE DIRECTION | | | OF TRAVEL. | | | | | | 6) PLEASE PROVIDE MINIMUM INTERIOR FINISH | | | CLASSIFICATION FOR WALLS AND CEILINGS IN ACCORDANCE | | | WITH NFPA 101, CHAPTER 10. | | | | | | 7) OCCUPANT LOAD SIGNS WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO FIRE | | | FINAL. | | | | | | 8) STAIS SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 101, SECTION 7.2.2.2.1 | | | (A). | | | | | | 9) NO COMBUSTIBLE PERMITTED ABOVE CEILING IF BEING USED | | | AS RETURN AIR PLENUM. | | | | | | 10) PENETRATIONS AND OPENINGS ARE PROHIBITED INTO EXIT | | | ENCLOSURES UNLESS PERMITTED IN NFPA 101, SECTION | | | 7.1.3.2.1 (6). PLEASE SEE CONDUITS THROUGH EXIT STAIRS | | | ON SHEET E-1. | | | | | | 11) DUCT SMOKE DETECTORS SHALL INITIATE A GENERAL FIRE | | | ALARM IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL REQUIREMENTS. SHT E-3 FA | | | NOTE (7) | | | | | | 12) SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS AND PERMITS IN ADDITION TO | | | FIRE SPRINKLER REMODEL WILL BE REQUIRED FOR FIRE ALARM | | | SYSTEM. | | | | | | 13) PLEASE PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION IN REFERENCE TO | | | PROPOSED VOICE ALARM. (MESSAGE) | | | | | | 14) HANDRAILS ARE REQUIRED FOR BOTH SIDES OF STAIRS. | | | | | | 15) PLANS DON'T SHOW A SMOKE DETECTOR IN ELEVATOR | | | LOBBY. E SHEETS | | | | | | 16) AN EXIT SIGN IS SHOWN ON E-2 DIRECTING PERSONS FROM | | | VESTIBULE 100. FROM THAT POINT IT IS UNCLEAR WHERE | | | PERSONS CONTINUE TO EXIT. | | | | | | 17) THERE APPEARS TO BE AN EXIT SIGN MISSING IN | | | ELEVATOR 111. SHT E-2 | | | | | | 18) PLEASE CLEARLY ILLUSTRATE THE DOOR SWING OR | | | OPERATION OF THE REPAIR OR REPLACE METAL CLAD 90 MIN | | | DOOR BETWEEN SUITES 201 AND 202. | | | | | | 19) WHERE DO PERSONS EXIT AFTER THEY ENTER THE EXIT | | | ENCLOSURE ASSEMBLIES? PLEASE SHOW EXIT DISCHARGE AS IT | | | RELATES TO THIS PROJECT. | | | | | | | | | MIKE WENNERGREN, ASSISTANT FIRE MARSHAL | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW (561) 805-6722 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
15 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-07-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2009-07-15 |
Time |
09:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2009-07-15 |
Time |
09:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
14 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-01-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-01-26 |
Time |
10:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-01-26 |
Time |
10:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-01-26 10:20:27 | TO "COMM" BD#21 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
13 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-12-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2008-12-12 |
Time |
08:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2008-12-12 |
Time |
08:34 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-12 08:34:43 | TO "DPALMER" DESK/REV |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
12 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-11-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-11-17 |
Time |
14:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-11-17 |
Time |
14:49 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-11-17 14:50:16 | TO "DPALMER" DESK/REV |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
11 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-07-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-07-11 |
Time |
14:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-07-11 |
Time |
14:50 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-11 14:51:14 | TO "DPALMER" DESK/SUBMITTAL |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
10 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-06-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-06-12 |
Time |
09:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-06-12 |
Time |
09:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-12 09:34:27 | TO "COMM" BD#25 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
9 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-05-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-05-07 |
Time |
14:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-05-07 |
Time |
14:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-05-07 14:20:38 | TO "COMM" BD#25 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
8 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-04-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-04-03 |
Time |
13:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-04-03 |
Time |
13:27 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-04-03 13:28:49 | TO "JWITMER" DESK/SUBMITTAL |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-03-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-03-21 |
Time |
13:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-03-21 |
Time |
13:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-03-21 13:01:56 | TO "COMM" BD#1 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-01-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-01-31 |
Time |
12:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-01-31 |
Time |
12:21 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-01-31 12:21:36 | TO "P" BOX/REV |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-11-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-11-28 |
Time |
11:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-11-28 |
Time |
11:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-12-03 08:35:43 | TO "COMM" BD#24 | | 2007-11-28 11:37:04 | WAITING FOR "COMM" BD-REV |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-08-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-08-24 |
Time |
15:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-08-24 |
Time |
15:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-09-15 07:57:41 | TO COMM BOARDSPACE #46 | | 2007-08-24 15:22:55 | WAITING FOR "COMM" BD |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-05-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-05-29 |
Time |
11:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-05-29 |
Time |
11:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-06-19 18:46:26 | | | | | | | CORRECTION: ON COMM BD #5 | | 2007-06-15 16:06:34 | TO "COMM" BD#54 | | 2007-05-29 11:22:24 | WAITING FOR "COMM" BD |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-12-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-12-05 |
Time |
08:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-12-05 |
Time |
08:39 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-12-18 14:36:13 | TO "COMM" BD#10 | | 2006-12-05 08:40:31 | WAITING FOR "COMM" BD |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-10-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2006-10-20 |
Time |
13:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2006-09-13 |
Time |
15:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2006-09-13 00:00:00 | WAITING FOR "COMM" BD | | | TO "COMM" BD#13 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-12-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-12-24 |
Time |
10:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-12-24 |
Time |
10:15 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-24 10:16:37 | TO "DPALMER" DESK/SUBMITTAL |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
9 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-08-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-08-21 |
Time |
08:29 |
Rev Time |
0.40 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-08-21 |
Time |
08:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-08-21 08:30:01 | REVISION TO MECH. PLAN M-1. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
8 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-06-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-06-13 |
Time |
10:52 |
Rev Time |
1.15 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-06-13 |
Time |
10:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-13 10:52:51 | REVISION TO MECH. PLAN MM-1, M-2, AND M-3. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-05-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-05-08 |
Time |
08:45 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-05-08 |
Time |
08:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-05-08 08:52:44 | NO CHANGES TO MECH. PLANS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-03-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-03-26 |
Time |
11:28 |
Rev Time |
0.45 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-03-26 |
Time |
11:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-03-26 11:28:57 | REVISION TO MECH. PLANS PAGE M-1 AND M-2. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-12-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-12-06 |
Time |
12:13 |
Rev Time |
0.35 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-12-06 |
Time |
12:13 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-12-06 12:14:18 | REVISION TO MECH. PLANS PAGES M-1 AND M-2. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-09-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-09-18 |
Time |
16:14 |
Rev Time |
0.45 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-09-18 |
Time |
16:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-07-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
hmoser |
Date |
2007-07-26 |
Time |
19:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
hmoser |
Date |
2007-07-26 |
Time |
19:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-07-26 18:58:23 | PLAN DENIED | | | PLEASE PROVIDE RETURN AIR SIZE FOR THE NEW WALL ON THE | | | PLANS. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE DUCT AND GRILL SIZE ON ALL NEW DUCT AND | | | GRILLS ON THE PLANS | | | PLAN REVIEW BY HAROLD MOSER 561-805-6732 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-12-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
hmoser |
Date |
2006-12-19 |
Time |
18:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
hmoser |
Date |
2006-12-19 |
Time |
17:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2006-12-19 18:21:01 | PLAN DENIED | | | 1) PLEASE PROVIDE MANUFACTURERS INSTALLATION | | | INSTRUCTIONS FOR EVR 1& 2. | | | 2) PLEASE PROVIDE A CURB TO ROOF TIE DOWN DETAIL ON | | | PLANS. | | | 3) YOU CAN NOT USE GALVANIZED STRAP OVER THE RTU FOR | | | TIE DOWN. SEE SECTION 306.5 EQUIPMENT AND APPLIANCES ON | | | ROOFS FBC (M ) 2004 | | | PLAN REVIEW BY HAROLD MOSER 561-805-6732 | | 2006-12-19 18:10:44 | PLAN DENIED |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-10-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
hmoser |
Date |
2006-10-14 |
Time |
08:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
hmoser |
Date |
2006-10-14 |
Time |
07:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2006-10-14 08:54:05 | 1)PLEASE PROVIDE MANUFACTURERS INSTALLATION | | | INSTRUCTIONS FOR ERV #1 & #2 WITH PLANS. | | | 2)PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL ON THE CURB TO ROOF TIEDOWN | | | ON THE PLANS. | | | 3)PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL ON RTU TO CURB TIEDOWN ON | | | THE OPANS. | | | 4)PLEASE SHOW A CONTINUATION OF BATHROOM EXHAUST DUCT | | | ON PLANS. | | | 5) PLEASE PROVIDE RETURN AIR SIZE AND CFM ON EXISTING | | | 20 TON EQUIPMENT. | | | 6) PLEASE REFER TO SECTION 306.4.1 SUPERVISON FBC (M) | | | 2004. | | | PLAN REVIEW BY HAROLD MOSER 561-805-6732 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
9 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-07-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-07-14 |
Time |
10:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-07-14 |
Time |
08:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-07-14 10:19:37 | REVISIONS OK--SHTS P-1, P-2 & P-3--VENT LINE | | | DOWNSTREAM OF ACCESSIBLE W/C IN MEN'S TOILET ROOM 105 | | | NOT APPLICABLE. SEE SHT P-3 SANT RISER DIAGRAM. | | | (DELETED PER ENGINEER R. GILMAN). |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
8 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-05-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-05-21 |
Time |
08:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-05-20 |
Time |
12:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-05-21 09:48:27 | REVISION DENIED | | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | | | | | ****FROM PREVIOUS REVISION REVIEW: | | | | | | 1. SHT P-1 PREVIOUS REVISION SIGNED, SEALED & DATED JAN | | | 24, 2008 SUBMITTED REVISIONS 1 THRU 5. REVISION | | | SUBMITTED AT THIS TIME IS SHOWING NEW REVISION #1. THE | | | REVISION SEQUENCE SHALL REMAIN IN EFECT THRU THE LIFE | | | OF THE JOB, NOT REPEATING OR RESTARTING THE SEQUENCE AT | | | REVISION #1 AGAIN. THE REVISION NUMBERS TRACK THE | | | REVISION HISTORY AND THE NEXT REVISION SHOULD BE NUMBER | | | 6 TO CONTINUE THE SEQUENCE. SECTION 106.1.3. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE REVISION NUMBERS SHALL BE | | | KEPT IN SEQUENTIAL ORDER AND NOW THE INFORMATION FOR | | | PHASE I HAS BEEN DELETED. PLEASE CONTINUE WITH THE | | | REVISION NUMBERS ESTABLISHED AND SHOW ALL INFORMATION | | | FOR PHASE I AND REVISIONS TO PHASE II ON THE REVISED | | | SHEET. | | | | | | 2. SHT P-2 PREVIOUS REVISION SIGNED, SEALED & DATED JAN | | | 24, 2008 SUBMITTED REVISIONS 1 THRU 3. NO NEW REVISION | | | NUMBER OR CLOUD IS INDICATED THIS REVISION. PLEASE | | | INDICATE ALL REVISIONS WITH A CLOUD AND REVISION | | | NUMBER. THE REVISION NUMBER SHALL BE SEQUENTIAL TO | | | PREVIOUS REVISION NUMBERS. SECTION 106.1.3. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE REVISION NUMBERS SHALL BE | | | KEPT IN SEQUENTIAL ORDER AND NOW THE INFORMATION FOR | | | PHASE I HAS BEEN DELETED. PLEASE CONTINUE WITH THE | | | REVISION NUMBERS ESTABLISHED AND SHOW ALL INFORMATION | | | FOR PHASE I AND REVISIONS TO PHASE II ON THE REVISED | | | SHEET. | | | | | | 3. SHT P-3 PREVIOUS REVISION SIGNED, SEALED & DATED JAN | | | 24, 2008 SUBMITTED REVISIONS 1 THRU 4. NO NEW REVISION | | | NUMBER OR CLOUD IS INDICATED THIS REVISION. PLEASE | | | INDICATE ALL REVISIONS WITH A CLOUD AND REVISION | | | NUMBER. THE REVISION NUMBER SHALL BE SEQUENTIAL TO | | | PREVIOUS REVISION NUMBERS. SECTION 106.1.3. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE REVISION NUMBERS SHALL BE | | | KEPT IN SEQUENTIAL ORDER AND NOW THE INFORMATION FOR | | | PHASE I HAS BEEN DELETED. PLEASE CONTINUE WITH THE | | | REVISION NUMBERS ESTABLISHED AND SHOW ALL INFORMATION | | | FOR PHASE I AND REVISIONS TO PHASE II ON THE REVISED | | | SHEET. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING | | | THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-04-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-04-12 |
Time |
05:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-04-11 |
Time |
18:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-04-12 06:10:11 | REVISION DENIED | | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | | | | | 1. SHT P-1 PREVIOUS REVISION SIGNED, SEALED & DATED JAN | | | 24, 2008 SUBMITTED REVISIONS 1 THRU 5. REVISION | | | SUBMITTED AT THIS TIME IS SHOWING NEW REVISION #1. THE | | | REVISION SEQUENCE SHALL REMAIN IN EFECT THRU THE LIFE | | | OF THE JOB, NOT REPEATING OR RESTARTING THE SEQUENCE AT | | | REVISION #1 AGAIN. THE REVISION NUMBERS TRACK THE | | | REVISION HISTORY AND THE NEXT REVISION SHOULD BE NUMBER | | | 6 TO CONTINUE THE SEQUENCE. SECTION 106.1.3. | | | | | | 2. SHT P-2 PREVIOUS REVISION SIGNED, SEALED & DATED JAN | | | 24, 2008 SUBMITTED REVISIONS 1 THRU 3. NO NEW REVISION | | | NUMBER OR CLOUD IS INDICATED THIS REVISION. PLEASE | | | INDICATE ALL REVISIONS WITH A CLOUD AND REVISION | | | NUMBER. THE REVISION NUMBER SHALL BE SEQUENTIAL TO | | | PREVIOUS REVISION NUMBERS. SECTION 106.1.3. | | | | | | 3. SHT P-3 PREVIOUS REVISION SIGNED, SEALED & DATED JAN | | | 24, 2008 SUBMITTED REVISIONS 1 THRU 4. NO NEW REVISION | | | NUMBER OR CLOUD IS INDICATED THIS REVISION. PLEASE | | | INDICATE ALL REVISIONS WITH A CLOUD AND REVISION | | | NUMBER. THE REVISION NUMBER SHALL BE SEQUENTIAL TO | | | PREVIOUS REVISION NUMBERS. SECTION 106.1.3. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING | | | THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-02-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-02-22 |
Time |
07:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-02-22 |
Time |
07:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-12-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-12-15 |
Time |
08:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-12-15 |
Time |
08:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-12-15 08:59:11 | REVISION DENIED | | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 11 | | | | | | 1. SHT A-1 PER TABLE 403.1 A DRINKING FOUNTAIN IS | | | REQUIRED. PLEASE INDICATE ON MINIMUM FIXTURES REQUIRED, | | | SHOW THE LOCATION ON THE FLOOR PLAN AND SUBMIT A DETAIL | | | SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIONS 11-4.15 WITH ALL | | | SUBSECTIONS AS WELL AS SECTION 11-4.1.3(10)(A) | | | PROVISIONS FOR THOSE WHO HAVE DIFFICULTY BENDING OR | | | STOOPING IF THE DRINKING FOUNTAIN IS NOT A HI/LOW | | | TYPE. | | | | | | 2. SHTS P-1 KEY NOTE #8, P-2 WATER HEATER DETAIL & P-3 | | | SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM. HUB DRAIN ABOVE THE CEILING FOR | | | THE T/P, PAN DRAIN, THERMAL EXPANSION VALVE IS NOT | | | APPROVED. THE AIR GAP FOR THE P/T VALVE SHALL BE | | | VISIBLE, A TRAP PRIMER IS REQUIRED PER SECTION 1002.4 | | | AND THERE IS NO PIPE, TRAP SUPPORT INDICATED AS | | | REQUIRED PER SECTION 308.3. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-10-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-10-23 |
Time |
07:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-10-23 |
Time |
07:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-07-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-07-07 |
Time |
18:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-07-07 |
Time |
18:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-07-07 18:29:46 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 11 | | | | | | ****FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW: | | | ********FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS: | | | | | | 1. PERMIT APPLICATION STATES GROSS | | | SQUARE FOOTAGE AS 5423SF. COVER SHEET | | | INDICATES 54243SF BAR, AND 3571SF POOL | | | HALL. PLEASE CLARIFY. SECTION 106.1.1. | | | ****NO RESPONSE, NOT ADDRESSED. | | | *******RESPONSE NOTED, AND WHEN THE APPLICATION IS | | | CORRECTED THIS COMMENT WILL BE OK. WHEN THIS AND | | | COMMENT #9 ARE ADDRESS, THE STATUS OF THIS REVIEW WILL | | | BE APPROVED. | | | | | | 2. OK | | | 3. OK | | | 4. OK | | | 5. OK | | | 6. OK | | | 7. OK | | | 8. OK | | | | | | 9. ROUTE PLANS TO THE PALM BEACH COUNTY | | | HEALTH UNIT DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL | | | HEALTH FOR REVIEW PRIOR SO RESUBMITTING | | | TO THE CITY WPB FOR REVIEW. A MINIMUM OF | | | 2 SETS OF PLANS SHALL BE STAMPED AS | | | REVIEWED BY THE HEALTH DEPT. SECTION | | | 102.2.1. | | | ****NO RESPONSE, NOT ADDRESSED. | | | ********RESPONSE NOTED, AND WHEN THE PLANS COME BACK | | | WITH THE HEALTH DEPT. REVIEW STAMP THIS COMMENT WILL BE | | | OK. WHEN THIS AND COMMENT #1 ARE ADDRESSED THE REVIEW | | | STATUS WILL BE APPROVED. | | | | | | 10. OK | | | 11. OK | | | 12. OK | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-01-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-01-17 |
Time |
14:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-01-17 |
Time |
14:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-01-17 14:43:59 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 11 | | | | | | ****FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW: | | | | | | 1. PERMIT APPLICATION STATES GROSS | | | SQUARE FOOTAGE AS 5423SF. COVER SHEET | | | INDICATES 54243SF BAR, AND 3571SF POOL | | | HALL. PLEASE CLARIFY. SECTION 106.1.1. | | | ****NO RESPONSE, NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 2. ALL ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS. THE ADDRESS | | | ON THE TITLE BLOCK DOES NOT RELFECT THE INFORMATION FOR | | | THE ADDRESS ON THE DBPR | | | WEBSITE. PLEASE CLARIFY. (SEE ATTACHED | | | SHEET). FAC 61G1-16.004(1) FS 481.219. | | | ****NO RESPONSE, NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 3. SHT A-1 SUITE 202 DEMO NOTES. IN THE | | | REMOVAL OF ANY PART OF A DRAINAGE | | | SYSTEM, DEAD ENDS ARE PROHIBITED. | | | SECTION 704.5. SUBMIT AN EXISTING FLOOR | | | PLAN TO DETERMINE THE LOCATION OF ALL | | | DEMO'D PLUMBING SYSTEMS, AND TO VERIFY | | | THE EXTENT OF THE DEMOLITION. SECTION | | | 106.1.2. | | | ****NO RESPONSE, NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 4. OK | | | 5. OK | | | 6. OK | | | 7. OK | | | 8. OK | | | | | | 9. ROUTE PLANS TO THE PALM BEACH COUNTY | | | HEALTH UNIT DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL | | | HEALTH FOR REVIEW PRIOR SO RESUBMITTING | | | TO THE CITY WPB FOR REVIEW. A MINIMUM OF | | | 2 SETS OF PLANS SHALL BE STAMPED AS | | | REVIEWED BY THE HEALTH DEPT. SECTION | | | 102.2.1. | | | ****NO RESPONSE, NOT ADDRESSED | | | | | | 10. SHT P-1 KEY NOTE #4, AND SHT P-3 | | | SANT. RISER DIAGRAM. EVERY DRY VENT | | | SHALL RISE VERTICALLY TO A MINIMUM OF 6" | | | ABOVE THE FLOOD LEVEL RIM OF THE HIGHEST | | | TRAP OR TRAPPED FIXTURE BEING VENTED. | | | SECTION 905.4. | | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE VENTS ARE STILL SHOWN ON | | | SHT P-3. THESE VENTS BETWEEN THE W/C'S ARE NOT | | | REQUIRED, AND DO NOT MEET THE CODE REQUIREMENTS OF | | | SECTION 905.4. | | | | | | 11. OK | | | 12. OK | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-10-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2006-10-05 |
Time |
14:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2006-10-05 |
Time |
09:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2006-10-05 00:00:00 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 11 | | | | | | 1. PERMIT APPLICATION STATES GROSS | | | SQUARE FOOTAGE AS 5423SF. COVER SHEET | | | INDICATES 54243SF BAR, AND 3571SF POOL | | | HALL. PLEASE CLARIFY. SECTION 106.1.1. | | | | | | 2. ALL ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS. THE ADDRESS | | | ON THE TITLE BLOCK DOES NOT RELFECT THE INFORMATION FOR | | | THE ADDRESS ON THE DBPR | | | WEBSITE. PLEASE CLARIFY. (SEE ATTACHED | | | SHEET). FAC 61G1-16.004(1) FS 481.219. | | | | | | 3. SHT A-1 SUITE 202 DEMO NOTES. IN THE | | | REMOVAL OF ANY PART OF A DRAINAGE | | | SYSTEM, DEAD ENDS ARE PROHIBITED. | | | SECTION 704.5. SUBMIT AN EXISTING FLOOR | | | PLAN TO DETERMINE THE LOCATION OF ALL | | | DEMO'D PLUMBING SYSTEMS, AND TO VERIFY | | | THE EXTENT OF THE DEMOLITION. SECTION | | | 106.1.2. | | | | | | 4. SHT A-2 DETAILS 1 & 2. TURNING AREA | | | TO BE SHOWN IN THE TOILET ROOM, NOT IN | | | THE ACCESSIBLE STALL. SECTION 11-4.22.3. | | | | | | 5. SHT A-2 DETAIL 6 INDICATES 2 HEIGHTS | | | FOR THE WATER CLOSETS. BOTH INDICATE | | | STANDARD HEIGHT. ONE, (19"), SHALL BE | | | INDICATED AS ACCESSIBLE HEIGHT. SECTIONS | | | 106.1.1, AND 11-4.16.3. | | | | | | 6. SHT A-2 DETAIL 6 GRAB BAR ON THE SIDE | | | OF THE W/C SHALL BE 42" MINIMUM. SEE | | | FIGURES 11-29 & 11-30. | | | | | | 7. SHT A-2 DETAIL 6 FLUSH CONTROLS TO | | | COMPLY WITH SECTION 11-4.16.5. | | | | | | 8. SHT A-2 SUBMIT A DETAIL FOR THE | | | URINALS SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH: | | | A. 11-4.18.2 HEIGHT | | | B. 11-4.18.3 CLEAR FLOOR SPACE | | | C. 11-4.18.4 FLUSH CONTROLS | | | | | | 9. ROUTE PLANS TO THE PALM BEACH COUNTY | | | HEALTH UNIT DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL | | | HEALTH FOR REVIEW PRIOR SO RESUBMITTING | | | TO THE CITY WPB FOR REVIEW. A MINIMUM OF | | | 2 SETS OF PLANS SHALL BE STAMPED AS | | | REVIEWED BY THE HEALTH DEPT. SECTION | | | 102.2.1. | | | | | | 10. SHT P-1 KEY NOTE #4, AND SHT P-3 | | | SANT. RISER DIAGRAM. EVERY DRY VENT | | | SHALL RISE VERTICALLY TO A MINIMUM OF 6" | | | ABOVE THE FLOOD LEVEL RIM OF THE HIGHEST | | | TRAP OR TRAPPED FIXTURE BEING VENTED. | | | SECTION 905.4. | | | | | | 11. SHT P-2 WATER HEATER PIPING DIAGRAM | | | SHOWS A 2" HUB DRAIN FOR THE INDIRECT | | | WASTE OF THE PAN DRAIN, P/T DISCHARGE, | | | AND THE THERMAL EXPANSION VALVE. THIS IS | | | NOT SHOWN ON THE FLOOR PLAN, NOR ON THE | | | SANT. RISER DIAGRAM. IS THIS HUB DRAIN | | | EXISTING? PLEASE CLARIFY. SECTION | | | 106.1.1. | | | | | | 12. ALL INDIRECT WASTE SHALL DRAIN INTO | | | A FLOOR SINK OR A HUB DRAIN. SECTIONS | | | 802.3 & 802.3.2. FLOOR DRAINS ARE NOT | | | APPROVED INDIRECT WASTE RECEPTORS. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-01-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mflis |
Date |
2009-01-30 |
Time |
14:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mflis |
Date |
2009-01-30 |
Time |
14:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-06-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mflis |
Date |
2007-06-26 |
Time |
09:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mflis |
Date |
2007-06-26 |
Time |
09:05 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-06-26 09:06:47 | ZONING REVIEW: NOT REQUIRED | | | | | | * PERMIT HAS BEEN MODIFIED TO BE INTERIOR WORK ONLY | | | | | | * EXTERIOR MODIFICATIONS REMOVED | | | | | | MATT FLIS - 822-1445 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2006-12-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mflis |
Date |
2006-12-20 |
Time |
11:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mflis |
Date |
2006-12-20 |
Time |
11:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2006-12-20 11:40:40 | APPROVED - | | | | | | LIMITS OF WORK ONLY INCLUDE 2ND FLOOR INTERIOR AND | | | EXTERIOR WORK. | | | | | | MATT FLIS 822-1445 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-07-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mflis |
Date |
2006-10-31 |
Time |
13:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
hmoser |
Date |
2007-07-26 |
Time |
18:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2006-10-31 13:46:35 | ZONING COMMENTS: | | | | | | - PLEASE PROVIDE ENTIRE BUILDING ELEVATION INCLUDING | | | PROPOSED MODIFICATION TO OPENING. | | | - CLARIFY HOW OVERHEAD DOOR WILL BE USED; IS THIS AN | | | OPERABLE DOOR? THIS IS ON THE SECOND LEVEL. WILL THERE | | | BE SOME RAILING OR BARRIER? | | | - PLEASE CONFIRM OH DOOR DETAILS BASED UPON ABOVE | | | COMMENTS; ELEVATIONS FOR "TYPICAL" OH DOOR DO NOT MATCH | | | ON 2/A-3 AND 9/A-3. | | | | | | -MATT FLIS 822-1445 |
|
|