| Plan Review Stops For Permit 06090314 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-09-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2007-09-27 |
Time |
10:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2007-09-27 |
Time |
07:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-09-27 10:24:09 | BUILDING PROVISO | | | | | | SUBMIT 2 COPIES OF PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE SPANISH | | | ROOF TILES APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF | | | RECORD WITH THE METHOD OF ATTACHMENT CIRCLED ON THE | | | NOA. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-06-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2007-06-21 |
Time |
13:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2007-06-20 |
Time |
15:05 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-06-20 16:58:13 | DENIED BY BUILDING | | | | | | NOTE: THE ORIGINAL SCOPE OF WORK WAS CHANGED AND NEW | | | DRAWINGS WERE SUBMITTED. | | | | | | 1) A RECORDED COPY OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT | | | MUST BE SUBMITTED BEFORE A | | | PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. THE WORK IS REQUIRED TO BEGIN | | | WITHIN 90 DAYS OF THE DATE THE NOC IS RECORDED OR IT | | | WILL HAVE TO BE RE-RECORDED. | | | | | | 2) THE ENERGY CALCULATION FORMS ARE REQUIRED TO BE | | | SIGNED BY THE OWNER/AGENT. | | | | | | 3) PROVIDE A DRAINAGE PLAN FOR THE LOT AS REQUIRED BY | | | FBC R401.3. INDICATE HOW AND WHERE THE SURFACE WATER | | | WILL BE DIRECTED TO AN APPROVED POINT OF COLLECTION. | | | | | | 4) SPECIFY HOW THE ROOF VENTILATION AS REQUIRED BY FBC | | | R806.1 WILL BE PROVIDED FOR THE FLAT ROOF ADDITION. | | | | | | 5)SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH R903.4 FOR ROOF DRAINAGE. | | | INDICATE THE LOCATIONS AND SIZES OF THE ROOF DRAINS OR | | | SCUPPERS. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR SCUPPER SIZING. | | | SPECIFY SIZES AND LOCATIONS OF OVERFLOW SCUPPERS AS | | | REQUIRED BY R903.4.1. | | | | | | 6) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH R320.7, WHICH REQUIRES ALL | | | BUILDINGS WITH EAVES LESS THAN 6" TO HAVE GUTTERS WITH | | | DOWNSPOUTS THAT DISCHARGE AT LEAST ONE FOOT FROM THE | | | STRUCTURE. | | | | | | 7) FBC R905.3.3.1 FOR LOW SLOPE ROOFS REQUIRES TWO | | | LAYERS OF UNDERLAYMENT. SPECIFY TWO LAYERS OF | | | UNDERLAYMENT FOR THE 3:12 AND 2.25:12 PITCH ROOF. | | | | | | 8) PLEASE REVISE SCOPE OF WORK ON SHEET C1. THE SCOPE | | | OF WORK WAS CHANGED TO ELIMINATE THE SECOND STORY. | | | | | | 9) PLEASE REVISE THE UPLIFT INFORMATION ON C1. THERE IS | | | NO LONGER AN UPPER AND LOWER ROOF. THERE IS A SLOPED | | | ROOF AND A FLAT ROOF. PLEASE REVISE THE SPECIFIED | | | UPLIFT PRESSURES TO COMPLY WITH FBC TABLE 1609.6.2.1(2) | | | OR SUBMIT SIGNED AND SEALED CALCULATIONS INDICATING HOW | | | THE PRESSURES WERE DETERMINED. | | | | | | 10) THE LIST OF PRODUCT APPROVALS ON C1 SPECIFIES FLAT | | | ROOF AND THIS SHOULD STATE FLAT ROOF COVERING MATERIAL | | | OR BUR ROOF SYSTEM. PLEASE CORRECT. THE PRODUCT | | | APPROVALS ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED. THIS PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL CONTAINS SEVERAL APPROVED ASSEMBLIES FOR | | | INSULATED AND NON-INSULATED DECKS, AS WELL AS, | | | DIFFERENT FASTENING OPTIONS AND DESIGN PRESSURES. | | | THEREFORE, THE ASSEMBLY, FASTENING OPTION AND DESIGN | | | PRESSURE ARE REQUIRED TO BE SPECIFIED. THIS CAN BE | | | ACCOMPLISHED BY CIRCLING THE APPROPRIATE ITEMS ON THE | | | NOA. ALSO NOTE THAT RAS 117 CALCULATIONS MAY BE | | | REQUIRED FOR PERIMETER AND CORNER AREAS, ROOF ZONES 2 | | | AND 3 RESPECTIVELY. SEE LIMITATION NUMBER 7 OF THE | | | NOA. | | | | | | 11) THE PRODUCT INFORMATION ON C1 HAS BEEN REVISED AND | | | UPDATED. PLEASE REMOVE IT OR CORRECT IT. | | | | | | 12)PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH | | | PERMIT APPLICATION AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 | | | ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA | | | PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR INFORMATION | | | PLEASE SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT | | | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. PRODUCTS WITH | | | STATEWIDE APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE | | | SUBMITTED WITH A COVER SHEET THAT LISTS | | | THE PRODUCT IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE | | | STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT HAVE | | | STATEWIDE APPROVAL, SUBMIT AN APPLICA- | | | TION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR SITE | | | SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE 9B-72. SUBMIT 2 COPIES OF THE | | | PRODUCT APPROVALS. THE FLORIDA COVERSHEET AND NOA OR | | | OTHER EVALUATION IS REQUIRED. PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE | | | REQUIRED FOR EXTERIOR DOORS AND WINDOWS, ROOF | | | COVERINGS, STORM PANELS, TRUSS HANGERS, CONNECTORS AND | | | STRAPS AND OTHER PRODUCTS LISTED BY RULE 9B-72. | | | | | | 13)WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT | | | APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCT WHICH ARE | | | REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE | | | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE | | | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL | | | FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. | | | | | | 14)IF THE GLAZED OPENINGS ARE NOT IMPACT RESISTANT | | | SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS, KEY PLANS AND INSTALLATION | | | SCHEDULES ( INCLUDE FASTENER TYPES, SPACING ,ETC.) FOR | | | THE STORM PANELS. | | | | | | 15)TWO SETS OF SIGNED AND SEALED PLANS, PRODUCT | | | APPROVALS, ENERGY FORMS, ETC. OR REQUIRED. | | | | | | 16) THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED FOR THE WINDOWS IS NOT | | | ACCEPTABLE. IT IS INCOMPLETE AND HAS BEEN REVISED. | | | | | | 17) PLEASE RESUBMIT THE PLAN SHEETS WITH THE COUNTY | | | IMPACT FEE STAMPS OR HAVE THE NEW REVISED SHEETS | | | STAMPED FOR IMPACT FEES. | | | | | | 18) ONE SET OF THE OLD PLANS CAN BE RESUBMITTED FOR | | | REFERENCE PURPOSES. | | | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | | (561)805-6714 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-01-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2007-01-02 |
Time |
15:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2007-01-02 |
Time |
15:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-01-02 15:59:23 | TWO STORY ADDITION | | | DENIED | | | | | | 1) A RECORDED COPY OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT | | | MUST BE SUBMITTED BEFORE A | | | PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. | | | | | | 2) IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM | | | BEACH COUNTY, PLANS STAMPED BY THEM AND | | | COPY OF RECEIPT SUBMITTED TO CITY OF | | | WEST PALM BEACH BUILDING DEPARTMENT, | | | BEFORE A BUILDING PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. | | | | | | 3)THE ENERGY CALCULATION FORMS THAT WERE SUBMITTED | | | CAN ONLY BE USED FOR ADDITIONS OF 600 SQFT OR LESS. | | | THIS ADDITION IS 952 SQFT. | | | SUBMIT THE CORRECT FORMS. SEE FBC 13-6. | | | | | | 4) PROVIDE A DRAINAGE PLAN FOR THE LOT AS REQUIRED BY | | | FBC R401.3. THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED DOES NOT ADEQUATELY | | | INDICATE THE SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS OF | | | SECTION R401.3 OF THE 2004 FBC RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | | | | | 5) THE LIVE LOAD FOR BALCONIES SHOULD BE 60 PSF UNDER | | | STRUCTURAL NOTES ON SHEET D1. SEE TABLE R 301.5. | | | | | | 6) SPECIFY THE REQUIRED ATTIC VENTILATION FOR THE | | | SECOND FLOOR. SEE FBC R806.1. SPECIFY HOW THE ADDITIONS | | | ATTIC WILL BE VENTED. | | | | | | 7) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC R320.7 WHICH REQUIRES ALL | | | BUILDINGS WITH EAVES LESS THAN 6"TO HAVE GUTTERS AND | | | DOWNSPOUTS THAT DISCHARGE 1 FOOT FROM THE STRUCTURE. | | | | | | 8) SPECIFY THE 2 LAYERS OF UNDERLAYMENT FOR THE 3:12 | | | PITCH CEMENT TILE ROOF THAT IS REQUIRED BY FBC | | | R905.3.3.1 FOR LOW SLOPE ROOFS. | | | | | | 9) PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE REQUIRED GUARD AT THE OPEN | | | SIDES OF THE STAIRS, SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH FBC | | | R312.1, R312.2.2 AND TABLE R 301.5. | | | | | | 10) PROVIDE HANDRAIL DETAILS AT THE STAIRS SHOWING | | | COMPLIANCE WITH FBC R311.5.6, 311.5.6.1 AND 311.5.6.3. | | | | | | 11) CITY OF WPB AMENDMENTS TO FBC 106.3.3 REQUIRES THE | | | DESIGNER OF RECORD FOR THE PROJECT TO REVIEW AND | | | APPROVE IN WRITING ALL OF THE PRODUCT APPROVALS. THE | | | ENGINEER THAT SIGNED AND SEALED THE PLANS IS THE | | | DESIGNER OF RECORD AND IS REQUIRED TO APPROVE THE | | | PRODUCT APPROVALS. | | | | | | 12) SPECIFYON THE PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA FOR THE MONIER | | | SPANISH "S" CONCRETE TILE, WHICH ONE OF THE METHODS OF | | | ATTACHMENTS LISTED WILL BE USED TO INSTALL THE TILE. | | | THE FASTENERS THAT WERE SPECIFIED ON THE NOA DO NOT | | | MEET THE REQUIRED MOMENT OF RESISTANCE. | | | | | | 13) SPECIFY WHICH ONE OF THE APPROVED ASSEMBLIES AND | | | DESIGN PRESSURE LISTED IN THE NOA FOR THE GAF BUR | | | SYSTEM WILL BE INSTALLED. THE APPROVED ASSEMBLY AND | | | MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURE WAS NOT SPECIFIED. SEE PAGES | | | 10-19 OF THE NOA. ENHANCED FASTENING MAY BE REQUIRED IN | | | THE PERIMETER AND CORNER ZONES,SUBMIT THE RAS 117 | | | CALCULATIONS (SEE LIMITATION NUMBER 7). | | | | | | 14) THE PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED FOR THE PGT SH-4000 | | | WINDOWS IS NOT FOR IMPACT RESISTANT WINDOWS AS | | | SPECIFIED ON THE PLANS. IT IS ALSO EXPIRED. | | | | | | 15) THE PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA FOR THE PGT HR710 IMPACT | | | WINDOW IS EXPIRED. THE CURRENT ONE IS NOA 03-0612.06 | | | FOR FL 242-R3. | | | | | | 16) SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE IMPACT RESISTANT | | | FIXED GLASS WINDOW. | | | | | | 17) SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE IMPACT RESISTANT | | | STRUCTURAL WINDOW MULLIONS. | | | | | | 18) IF THE NEW WINDOWS ARE NOT IMPACT RATED, THEN | | | SPECIFY HOW THE GLAZED OPENINGS WILL BE PROTECTED FROM | | | WINDBOURNE DEBRIS AS REQUIRED BY FBC R301.2.1.2. SUBMIT | | | PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR STORM PANELS, WITH AN | | | INSTALLATION SCHEDULE AND KEY PLAN. | | | | | | 19) PR0VIDE A DETAIL INDICATING HOW THE DECK WILL BE | | | WATERPROOFED SO THAT WHEN DECKING IS NAILED THROUGH THE | | | ROOF MEMBRANE IT WILL NOT LEAK. ALSO SPECIFY THE | | | FLASHING BETWEEN THE DECK AND THE EXTERIORWALL. | | | | | | 20) FOUR SETS OF PLANS WERE SUBMITTED. TWO OF THE SETS | | | DO NOT HAVE ALL SHEETS SIGNED AND SEALED. TWO COMPLETE | | | SETS OF THE SIGNED AND SEALED DRAWINGS ARE REQUIRED. | | | PLEASE REMOVE EXTRA PLANS TO AVOID CONFUSION. IF PLAN | | | SHEETS ARE REVISED THEN YOU CAN SUBMIT ONE COPY OF THE | | | OLD PLAN SHEETS FOR COMPARISON PURPOSES. HOWEVER, | | | PLEASE MARK THE OLD SHEETS VOID OR OLD SHEETS. | | | | | | NOTE: MOST OF THE ABOVE COMMENTS ARE FROM THE FIRST | | | REVIEW AND HAVE NOT BEEN ADDRESSED. IF YOU HAVE | | | QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL. | | | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | | (561)805-6714 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-10-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2006-10-16 |
Time |
08:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2006-10-16 |
Time |
08:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2006-10-16 08:42:34 | | | | DENIED | | | | | | 1) A RECORDED COPY OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT | | | MUST BE SUBMITTED BEFORE A | | | PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. | | | | | | 2) IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM | | | BEACH COUNTY, PLANS STAMPED BY THEM AND | | | COPY OF RECEIPT SUBMITTED TO CITY OF | | | WEST PALM BEACH BUILDING DEPARTMENT, | | | BEFORE A BUILDING PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. | | | | | | 3) THE VALUE FOR THE SCOPE OF WORK HAS BEEN INCREASED | | | TO $ 83,805.00. THE FEES HAVE BEEN ADJUSTED. | | | | | | 4) THE ENERGY CALCULATION FORMS THAT WERE SUBMITTED CAN | | | ONLY BE USED FOR ADDITIONS OF 600 SQFT OR LESS. THIS | | | ADDITION IS 952 SQFT. | | | SUBMIT THE CORRECT FORMS. SEE FBC 13-6. | | | | | | 5) PROVIDE A DRAINAGE PLAN FOR THE LOT AS REQUIRED BY | | | FBC 401.3. | | | | | | 6) FBC R 403.1.4 REQUIRES EXTERIOR FOOTINGS TO BE A | | | MINIMUM OF 12" BELOW FINAL GRADE. PLEASE INDICATE THIS | | | ON SETION F1 ON SHEET A3.0. | | | | | | 7) WALL SECTION B ON A5.0 SPECIFIES AN 18" THICK | | | FOOTING AND F1 ON A3.0 HAS A 16" THICK FOOTING. PLEASE | | | CLARIFY. | | | | | | 8) THE UPLIFT VALUE FOR THE SIMPSON LUS 210 SHOULD BE | | | 1165 #, NOT 3015 # PER THE 2006 SIMPSON CATALOG. PLEASE | | | CORRECT THE TRUSS ANCHOR SCHEDULES ON A4.0 AND A 4.1. | | | | | | 9) THE SIMPSON LSSU 410 REQUIRES (18) 16D NAILS TO THE | | | STRUCTURE PER THE CATALOG. PLEASE CORRECT. | | | | | | 10) THE PLYWOOD ROOF SHEATHING NOTES ON A4.1 CONTAINS | | | SEVERAL ERRORS. THE NOTES SPECIFY 3 ' OK (TYPO FOR OC) | | | WHICH CONFLICTS WITH THE 4"0C SPECIFIED IN THE SCHEDULE | | | ON THE SAME PAGE. THE NOTES STATE THAT ZONE 1 CAN BE | | | ASSUMED THROUGHOUT THE ROOF. THIS IS INCORRECT AS ZONES | | | 2 AND 3 REQUIRE ENHANCED FASTENING. THE NOTE ALSO | | | SPECS. 1-3/4" NAILS WHICH IS ALSO INCORRECT. THE | | | MINIMUM NAILS REQUIRED ARE 8D (2-1/2" ). | | | | | | 11) THERE IS A TYPO IN THE SCHEDULES ON A4.0 AND A4.1, | | | THE WORD SHOULD BE SHANK NOT SHARK. PLEASE CORRECT. | | | | | | 12) THE LIVE LOAD FOR BALCONIES SHOULD BE 60 PSF UNDER | | | STRUCTURAL NOTES ON SHEET D1. | | | | | | 13) FBC R704 REQUIRES CLEARANCE OF NOT LESS THAN 6" | | | BETWEEN EXTERIOR WALL COVERINGS AND THE FINISH GRADE | | | FOR TERMITE INSPECTION. FBC R319.1(5)REQUIRES WOOD | | | SIDIN, SHEATHING AND WALL FRAMING TO BE PRESSURE | | | TREATED OR DECAY-RESISTANT WOOD ORHAVE CLEARANCE OF | | | AT LEAST 6 " FROM THE GROUND. FBC R404.1.6 REQUIRES | | | CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALLS TO EXTEND 6" ABOVE FINISHED | | | GRADE. PLEASE REVISE FOOTING DETAILS AND SECTIONS TO | | | COMPLY. | | | | | | 14) SPECIFY THE REQUIRED ATTIC VENTILATION FOR THE | | | SECOND FLOOR. SEE FBC R806.1. | | | | | | 15) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC R320.7 WHICH REQUIRES ALL | | | BUILDINGS WITH EAVES LESS THAN 6"TO HAVE GUTTERS AND | | | DOWNSPOUTS THAT DISCHARGE 1 FOOT FROM THE STRUCTURE. | | | | | | 16) SPECIFY THE 2 LAYERS OF UNDERLAYMENT FOR THE 3:12 | | | PITCH CEMENT TILE ROOF THAT IS REQUIRED BY FBC | | | R905.3.3.1 FOR LOW SLOPE ROOFS. | | | | | | 17) PROVIDE STRUCTURAL DETAILS FOR THE SECOND FLOOR | | | DECK THAT ALSO SPECIFIES SPACING OF INTERMEDIATE RAILS. | | | SEE FBC R312 AND R301.5. | | | | | | 18) PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE REQUIRED GUARD AT THE OPEN | | | SIDES OF THE STAIRS, SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH FBC | | | R312.1, R312.2.2 AND TABLE R 301.5. | | | | | | 19) ON SHEET A3.0 THE FOOTING SECTION TAG ON THE LEFT | | | SIDE OF THE FOUNDATION PLAN IS INCORRECTLY GIVEN AS | | | (F2). IT SHOULD BE (F1) AT THIS LOCATION. | | | | | | 20) PROVIDE HANDRAIL DETAILS SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FBC R311.5.6, 311.5.6.1 AND 311.5.6.3. | | | | | | 21) CITY OF WPB AMENDMENTS TO FBC 106.3.3 REQUIRES THE | | | DESIGNER OF RECORD FOR THE PROJECT TO REVIEW AND | | | APPROVE IN WRITING THE PRODUCT APPROVALS. | | | | | | 22) SPECIFYON THE PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA FOR THE MONIER | | | SPANISH "S" CONCRETE TILE, WHICH ONE OF THE METHODS OF | | | ATTACHMENTS LISTED WILL BE USED TO INSTALL THE THE | | | TILE. | | | | | | 23) SPECIFY WHICH ONE OF THE APPROVED ASSEMBLIES AND | | | DESIGN PRESSURE LISTED IN THE NOA FOR THE GAF BUR | | | SYSTEM WILL BE INSTALLED. | | | | | | 24) THE PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED FOR THE PGT SH-4000 | | | WINDOWS IS NOT FOR IMPACT RESISTANT WINDOWS AS | | | SPECIFIED ON THE PLANS. IT IS ALSO EXPIRED. | | | | | | 25) THE PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA FOR THE PGT HR710 IMPACT | | | WINDOW IS EXPIRED. THE CURRENT ONE IS NOA 03-0612.06 | | | FOR FL 242-R3. | | | | | | 26) SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE IMPACT RESISTANT | | | FIXED GLASS WINDOW. | | | | | | 27) SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE IMPACT RESISTANT | | | STRUCTURAL WINDOW MULLIONS. | | | | | | 28) PR0VIDE A DETAIL INDICATING HOW THE DECK WILL BE | | | WATERPROOFED SO THAT WHEN DECKING IS NAILED THROUGH THE | | | ROOF MEMBRANE IT WILL NOT LEAK. ALSO SPECIFY THE | | | FLASHING BETWEEN THE DECK AND THE EXTERIORWALL. | | | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | | (561)805-6714 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-11-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-11-05 |
Time |
08:23 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-11-05 |
Time |
08:05 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-06-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-06-17 |
Time |
07:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-06-17 |
Time |
07:35 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-09-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-09-11 |
Time |
11:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-05-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-05-21 |
Time |
15:23 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-05-21 |
Time |
14:13 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-05-21 15:23:31 | | | | | | | NONCOMPLIANT | | | | | | PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS FOR CODE | | | COMPLIANCE AND RESUBMIT FOR REVIEW. | | | | | | 1} THE ENGINEER WHOSE NAME APPEARS ON THE TITLE BLOCK | | | MUST SIGN, DATE AND SEAL THE DOCUMENT. 61G15-23.002 | | | FAC. | | | | | | 2} PLEASE LOCATE ALL SERVICE EQUIPMENT ON THE PLAN, | | | METER ENCLOSURE, DISCONNECTS AND PANELS, SO THAT | | | COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLES 225 AND 230 CAN BE REVIEWED. | | | | | | 3} SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE A/C EQUIPMENT ON THE PLAN. | | | ALSO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIRED DISCONNECT PER | | | 440.14,RECEPTACLE PER 210.63. | | | | | | 4} KITCHEN RECEPTACLE SPACING MUST COMPLY WITH | | | 210.8(A)(6) GFI. | | | | | | 5} BATH CIRCUIT REQUIRED TO HAVE A 20 AMP RECEPTACLE | | | PER 210.11(C) (3), LOCATED PER 210.52(D), AND BE GFI | | | PROTECTED PER 210.8(A) (1). | | | | | | 6} INDICATE IF THE SERVISE SHOWN ON THE RISER IS | | | RELOCATED (NEW) AND PART OF THIS APPLICATION OR IF | | | EXISTING. | | | | | | 7} THE 2005 NEC WAS ADOPTED BY THE FLORIDA LEGISLATURE | | | EFFECTIVE 8 DECEMBER 2006. THE APPLICATION FOR THIS | | | PROJECT WAS AFTER THAT DATE AND THE PLANS ARE SUBJECT | | | TO THAT CODE. PLEASENOTE SAME ON PLAN. | | | | | | 8} NOTE #3 INCORRECTLY REFERENCES 210.72, ARTICLE 210 | | | 70 SHOULD BE THE REFERENCE. | | | | | | 9} SEE THE DEFINITION OF "SMOKE DETECTORS" 11.8.2.1 | | | NFPA-72, CLARIFY IF USING DETECTORS OR ALARMS, TO AVOID | | | CONFUSION IN THE FIELD. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL. | | | | | | BILL TROBAUGH | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561/805-6718 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-12-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2006-12-12 |
Time |
15:55 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2006-12-12 |
Time |
14:46 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-12-12 15:49:48 | | | | | | | | | | NONCOMPLIANT | | | | | | PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS | | | FOR CODE COMPLIANCE AND RESUBMIT FOR | | | REVIEW. | | | | | | 1} SHOW THE PHYSICAL LOCATION OF ALL | | | SERVICE EQUIPMENT ON THE PLAN SO THAT | | | COMPLIANCE WITH 230.70(A)(1) CAN BE | | | REVIEWED. THERE ARE REFERENCES TO THE SERVICE BEING | | | MOVED, SHOW THAT LOCATION, AND THE LOCATION OF THE | | | RELOCATED PANEL. | | | | | | 2} THE RISER INDICATES TWO CONDUCTORS (WRONG SIZE @ | | | #30) TO THE PANEL.ALSO SEE 250.66 FOR THE CORRECT | | | GROUNDING ELECTRODE CONDUCTOR. | | | | | | PLEASE REMOVE OLD SHEETS, INSERT NEW | | | ONES, SUBMIT OLD SHEETS TO EXPEDITE | | | REVIEW AND SUBMIT WRITTEN RESPONSE TO | | | THE COMMENTS MADE IN THIS REVIEW. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL. | | | | | | BILL TROBAUGH | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW. | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561/805-6718 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-09-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2006-09-26 |
Time |
10:25 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2006-09-26 |
Time |
07:31 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-09-26 00:00:00 | | | | | | | NONCOMPLIANT | | | | | | PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS | | | FOR CODE COMPLIANCE AND RESUBMIT FOR | | | REVIEW. | | | | | | 1} SHOW THE PHYSICAL LOCATION OF ALL | | | SERVICE EQUIPMENT ON THE PLAN SO THAT | | | COMPLIANCE WITH 230.70(A)(1) CAN BE | | | REVIEWED. | | | | | | 2} THE EQUIPMENT GROUND RAN FROM THE | | | METER TO THE PANEL IS IN VIOLATION OF | | | 250.6. NOTE THAT THE GROUNDING ELECTRODE | | | SYSTEM IS ESTABLISHED AT THE FIRST MEANS | | | OF DISCONNECT, ALL EQUIPMENT GROUNDS | | | SHALL BE RAN FROM THAT POINT. | | | | | | 3} PROVIDE LOAD CALCULATIONS PER ARTICLE | | | 220.31 OR STANDARD CALCULATION IF | | | REDUCING THE NEUTRAL SIZE. | | | | | | 4} THE RANGE(CIRCUIT #11/13)OVERCURRENT | | | SIZE IS TOO LARGE FOR THE CONDUCTOR (#8) | | | PER 310.16, AND FOR THE 8KW LOAD. | | | | | | 5} PLEASE SEE THE EXISTING BUILDING CODE | | | REQUIRES A SMOKE DETECTOR IN THE | | | EXISTING BEDROOM UNDER LEVEL 2 | | | ALTERATIONS, ARTICLE 604.4.3. THAT | | | DETECTOR MUST BE INTERCONNECTED PER | | | R313.1.1, IF THE EXEPTIION PROVISION | | | EXISTS. | | | | | | 6} THE ENGINEER WHOSE NAME APPEARS ON | | | THE TITLE BLOCK MUST SIGN, DATE AND SEAL | | | THE DOCUMENT. 61G15-23.002 FAC. | | | | | | NOTE: THERE ARE NUMEROUS INSTANCES IN | | | THE PANEL SCHEDULE INDICATING #12 | | | CONDUCTORS ON 15 AMP BREAKERS. WHILE | | | THIS IS NOT A CODE VIOLATION, IF IT IS | | | INDICATED ON THE PLAN IT MUST ACTUALLY | | | BE INSTALLED THAT WAY OR THE PLANS | | | REVISED TO INDICATE ACTUAL CONDITIONS. | | | PLEASE VERIFY. | | | | | | ONLY TWO SETS OF PLANS ARE REQUIRED FOR | | | REVIEW, FOUR WERE SUBMITTED. | | | | | | PLEASE REMOVE OLD SHEETS, INSERT NEW | | | ONES, SUBMIT OLD SHEETS TO EXPEDITE | | | REVIEW AND SUBMIT WRITTEN RESPONSE TO | | | THE COMMENTS MADE IN THIS REVIEW. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL. | | | | | | BILL TROBAUGH | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | | 561/805-6718 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
9 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-10-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-10-27 |
Time |
08:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-10-27 |
Time |
08:28 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-10-27 08:32:06 | TO "BTROBAUG" DESK/REV |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
8 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-06-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-06-13 |
Time |
10:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-06-13 |
Time |
10:45 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-06-13 10:46:26 | TO "BTROBAUG" DESK/REV |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-09-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-09-05 |
Time |
11:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-09-05 |
Time |
11:48 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-09-05 11:48:50 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-05-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-05-15 |
Time |
09:23 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-05-15 |
Time |
09:23 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-05-15 09:23:26 | TO "BTROBAUG" DESK/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-05-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-05-10 |
Time |
15:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-05-10 |
Time |
15:59 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-05-10 15:59:45 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-12-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-12-12 |
Time |
08:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-12-12 |
Time |
08:17 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-12-12 08:17:39 | TO "BTROBAUGH" DESK/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-12-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-12-01 |
Time |
14:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-12-01 |
Time |
14:16 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-12-01 14:16:51 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-09-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-09-20 |
Time |
15:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-09-20 |
Time |
15:05 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-09-20 00:00:00 | TO "E" BOX |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-10-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2006-10-16 |
Time |
08:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2006-09-11 |
Time |
16:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2006-09-11 00:00:00 | TO "Z" BOX |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-09-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-09-11 |
Time |
15:01 |
Rev Time |
0.30 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-09-11 |
Time |
15:01 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-05-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-05-22 |
Time |
08:36 |
Rev Time |
0.30 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-05-22 |
Time |
08:36 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-05-22 08:39:30 | *** DENIED *** | | | 1)AS NOTED IN LAST TWO REVIEWS 9-28-06 NOTE #3, AND | | | 12-13-06 NOTE #3, WHEN RE-DOING THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS | | | THEY ALSO NEED TO BE SIGNED BY THE OWNER/AGENT, PER | | | 2004 FBC 13-600.3.ABC.2. | | | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-12-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2006-12-13 |
Time |
13:17 |
Rev Time |
0.30 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2006-12-13 |
Time |
13:17 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-12-13 13:31:36 | *** DENIED *** | | | 1)ALL INFORMATION, DRAWINGS, | | | SPECIFICATIONS AND ACCOMPANYING DATA | | | SHALL BEAR THE PRINTED NAME AND | | | SIGNATURE OF THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE | | | FOR THE DESIGN. PER FBC 104.2.1 . | | | | | | 2) AS NOTED IN LAST REVIEW 9-28-06, THE ENERGY | | | CALCULATIONS CAN NOT BE ON | | | FORM 600C-04 AS THE ADDITION IS OVER 600 | | | SQ. FT. PER 2004 FBC 13-600.3.C . PLEASE SUBMIT FORM A | | | OR B. | | | | | | 3) AS NOTED IN LAST REVIEW 9-28-06, WHEN RE-DOING THE | | | ENERGY CALCULATIONS | | | THEY ALSO NEED TO BE SIGNED BY THE | | | OWNER/AGENT, PER 2004 FBC 13-600.3.ABC.2 | | | | | | 4) AS NOTED IN LAST REVIEW 9-28-06, PLEASE SUBMIT | | | MANUAL J CALCULATIONS | | | FOR THE WHOLE HOUSE TO JUSTIFY THE NEED | | | OF A 5 TON A/C SYSTEM, PER 2004 FBC | | | 13-607.1.ABC.1 . | | | | | | 6) AS NOTED IN THE LAST REVIEW 9-28-06,SHOW ON THE | | | MECHANICAL PLANS THE SIZE OF THE SUPPLY AIR TRUNK LINE | | | ON THE FIRST FLOOR FROM THE AHU TO | | | THE MIXING BOX. | | | | | | 7) AS NOTED IN THE LAST REVIEW 9-28-06, SHOW ON THE | | | MECHANICAL PLANS THE LOCATION OF THE CLOTHES | | | DRYER VENT, SEE 2004 FBC/M 501.2 . | | | | | | 8) SEE ATTACHED NOTICE FS 553.80(2)(B) | | | REGARDING FOUR TIMES THE FEE. | | | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-09-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2006-09-28 |
Time |
08:19 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2006-09-28 |
Time |
08:18 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-09-28 00:00:00 | *** DENIED *** | | | 1) THE ENGINEER WHOSE NAME APPEARS ON | | | THE TITLE BLOCK MUST SIGN, DATE, AND | | | SEAL THE MECHANICAL PLANS, PER FAC | | | 61G15-23.002 . | | | | | | 2) THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS CAN NOT BE ON | | | FORM 600C-04 AS THE ADDITION IS OVER 600 | | | SQ. FT. PER 2004 FBC 13-600.3.C . | | | | | | 3) WHEN RE-DOING THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS | | | THEY ALSO NEED TO BE SIGNED BY THE | | | OWNER/AGENT, PER 2004 FBC 13-600.3.ABC.2 | | | | | | 4) PLEASE SUBMITMANUAL J CALCULATIONS | | | FOR THE WHOLE HOUSE TO JUSTIFY THE NEED | | | OF A 5 TON A/C SYSTEM, PER 2004 FBC | | | 13-607.1.ABC.1 . | | | | | | 5) PLEASE SUBMIT MANUAL D CALCULATIONS | | | FOR RESIDENTIAL DUCT DESIGN, PER 2004 | | | FBC/R M1601.1 AND FBC 13-610.1.ABC.1 . | | | AS 10" SUPPLY AIR DUCTS APPEAR OVER | | | SIZED FOR THE ROOMS. | | | | | | 6) SHOW THE SIZE OF THE SUPPLY AIR TRUNK | | | LINE ON THE FIRST FLOOR FROM THE AHU TO | | | THE MIXING BOX ON THE MECH. PLANS. | | | | | | 7) SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE CLOTHES | | | DRYER VENT ON THE MECH. PLANS, PLEASE | | | NOTE CLOTHES DRYER VENT TERMINATION MUST | | | BE A MIN. OF 4 FT. FROM A/C CONDENSER | | | UNIT, PER 2004 FBC/M 501.2 . | | | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-09-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleech |
Date |
2007-09-25 |
Time |
08:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jleech |
Date |
2007-09-25 |
Time |
08:41 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-06-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleech |
Date |
2007-06-05 |
Time |
07:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jleech |
Date |
2007-06-05 |
Time |
07:30 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2006-12-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleech |
Date |
2006-12-27 |
Time |
08:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jleech |
Date |
2006-12-27 |
Time |
08:03 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-10-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleech |
Date |
2006-10-04 |
Time |
14:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jleech |
Date |
2006-10-04 |
Time |
14:27 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-10-04 00:00:00 | DENIED; | | | 1.SHOW HOW FLAT ROOF DRAINS. PLEASE SHOW | | | DRAINS OR SUPPERS, AND SECONDARY DRAINS | | | PER CHAPTER 11. SHOW SQUIRE FT. TO BE | | | DRAINED. | | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | JOHN LEECH | | | 805-6695 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-09-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
choops |
Date |
2007-09-07 |
Time |
08:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
choops |
Date |
2007-09-07 |
Time |
08:31 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-09-07 08:36:05 | PROVISO:AS THIS IS A NONCONFORMING STRUCTURE WITH | | | REGARDS TO THE FRONT SETBACK.THE NONCONFORMITY SHALL | | | NOT BE INCREASED AND NO NEW NONCONFORMITY SHALL BE | | | CREATED. (STRUCTURE MAY NOT BE CLOSER THAN 24' TO THE | | | FRONT PROPERTY LINE.NO STRUCTURE (ROOF OVERHANGS) | | | SHALL BE CLOSER THAN 22' TO THE FRONT PROPERTY | | | LINE...ROOF OVERHANGS ARE ALLOWED TO PROJECT 3' INTO | | | THE REQUIRED SETBACK OF 25'. | | | | | | PROVISO:ANY PROPOSED/MOVED MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL | | | NOT ENCROACH MORE THAN 4' INTO ANY REQUIRED SETBACK. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-05-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
choops |
Date |
2007-05-11 |
Time |
16:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
choops |
Date |
2007-05-11 |
Time |
16:49 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-05-11 16:50:55 | ***FAILED*** | | | | | | | | | 1)PLEASE PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF AN UPDATED SURVEY | | | SHOWING THE SCOPE OF WORK, WITH DIMENSION OF PROPOSED | | | ADDITION, AND DIMENSIONS FROM PROPERTY LINES TO | | | PROPOSED WORK. | | | | | | 2)PREVIOUS COMMENTS ATTACHED STILL APPLY. | | | | | | | | | CHRIS HOOPS | | | ZONING TECHNICIAN | | | 561-805-6720 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-12-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mmclean |
Date |
2006-12-09 |
Time |
13:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mmclean |
Date |
2006-12-09 |
Time |
13:08 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-12-09 13:28:14 | DENIED, | | | 1. NOW THAT SURVEYS HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, THE CONCRETE | | | DRIVE (CIRCULAR) WILL EXCEED THE ZONING REQUIREMENTS | | | FOR LANDSCAPE WITHIN THE FIRST 25FT FRONT SETBACK. | | | 2. THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF CONCRETE THAT CAN BE PROPOSED IS | | | 12FT WIDE (300SQ FT).CIRCULAR DRIVEWAY WILL NOT WORK | | | WITH THE FRONT SETBACK BEING 24FT. | | | 3. PLEASE CORRECT SITEPLAN TO REFLECT THE CHANGE IN | | | PROPOSED DRIVEWAY. | | | | | | NOTE: MUST MAINTAIN 1000SQ FT OR 75% OF LANDSCAPE, | | | WHICHEVER IS LESS WITHIN THE FIRST 25FT FRONT SETBACK. | | | | | | | | | 4. ON SITEPLAN PLEASE SHOW THE 2ND FLOOR OVERHANGE | | | WITHIN THE FRONT SETBACK. | | | | | | NOTE: PLEASE MAKE SURE THAT THE STRUCTURAL INSTRUSION | | | SEC 94-305(2) IS FOLLWED. | | | | | | NOTE. SEPARATE PERMIT MUST BE PULLED FOR | | | GATE/FENCE/WALL WITH EASEMENT APPROVAL FROM THE CITY OF | | | WEST PALM BEACH UTILITY DEPT. | | | | | | | | | MICHELLE MCLEAN | | | ZONING TECHNICIAN | | | 805-6720 | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-09-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mmclean |
Date |
2006-09-19 |
Time |
15:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mmclean |
Date |
2006-09-19 |
Time |
15:33 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-09-19 00:00:00 | DENIED, | | | 1. PLEASE SUBMIT A COPY OF CURRENT | | | SURVEY. | | | 2. THE PROPOSED ADDITION MUST MEET THE | | | 6FT SEPARATION FROM THE EXISTIING 1 | | | STORAGE BLDG. | | | 3. THE REMOVAL OF THE WALL(A1.0) MUST | | | MEET THE 6FT SEPARATION FROM THE STORAGE | | | BLDG (DISTANCE IS 5.167). | | | | | | MICHELLE MCLEAN | | | ZONING TECHNICIAN | | | 805-6720 |
|
|