| Plan Review Stops For Permit 06090266 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-08-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-08-29 |
Time |
08:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-08-29 |
Time |
07:37 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-08-29 08:41:44 | PROVISO SUBMITTAL OK. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-04-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-04-30 |
Time |
10:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-04-30 |
Time |
10:20 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-04-30 10:21:02 | TRUSS PACKAGE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-04-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-04-23 |
Time |
08:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-04-23 |
Time |
07:42 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-04-23 09:01:47 | TRUSS PACKAGE CHECKLIST: | | | 1- ENGINEER OF RECORD NEED TO REVIEW AND APPROVE TRUSS | | | PACKAGE PRIOR TO SUBMITTA L TO THIS OFFICE. | | | | | | 2- PROVIDE ONLY THE INFORMATION THAT APPLIES TO THIS | | | PROJECT. MOST OF THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED DON'T APPLY | | | TO THIS JOB. | | | | | | 3- SIGN, SEAL AND DATEALL SHEETS SUBMITTED AS | | | REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 471 FLORIDA STATUTE. | | | | | | 4- DESIGN CRITERIA IN ALL SHEETS TO MATCH. EG: LIVE | | | LOADS, DEAD LOADS, WIND EXPOSURE, ETC. | | | | | | 5- ENGINEERED TRUSSES SPECIFY BUILDING TYPE AS OPEN, | | | WHILE BUILDING IS DESIGNED AS ENCLOSED. SEE PLANS AND | | | REVISE/CLARIFY AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | (561)805-6712 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-02-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-02-07 |
Time |
10:03 |
Rev Time |
1.50 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-02-06 |
Time |
18:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-02-07 10:16:18 | BUILDING REVIEW APPROVED WITH PROVISO: | | | 1- PROVIDE TRUSSES FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO INSTALLATION AS | | | REQUIRED BY SEC. R802.1.6 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL | | | CODE. ENGINEER TO REVIEW AND APPROVE THEM PRIOR TO | | | SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | 2- ENGINEER OFRECORD TO PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS | | | SHOWING HOW TO PREVENT WATER ENTERING THRU VENTILATION | | | OPENINGS. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | 3- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE | | | 9B-72 FOR WINDOW MULLIONS. REMAINDER: ENGINEEROF | | | RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IT IN WRITING (NOT SIGNING | | | AND SEALING) IR PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THIS OFFICE AS | | | REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-11-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2006-11-17 |
Time |
16:16 |
Rev Time |
2.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2006-11-17 |
Time |
16:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2006-11-17 17:08:48 | BUILDING REVIEW 2ND CHECKLIST: | | | 1- OWES $4.46 FOR RADON FEES. | | | | | | 2- SOIL TEST REPORT SUBMITTED. COMMENTS ON FIRST | | | CHECKLIST WERE NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL: | | | A) NEED 2 COPIES WITH ORIGINAL SEAL, SIGNATURE AND | | | DATE AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 471 FLORIDA STATUTES. | | | B) NEED ENGINEERING FIRM CERTIFICATE OF | | | AUTHORIZATION IN THE REPORT AS REQUIRED BY FLORIDA | | | ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SEC. 61G15-23.002. | | | C) REPORT SAYS THAT PROPOSED CONTRUCTION IS MASONRY. | | | PLANS SHOW WOOD FRAME CONSTRUCTION. CLARIFY AND REVISE | | | AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 3- ENGINEER IN SOIL TEST REPORT RECOMMENDS STEM WALL | | | FOOTING FOUNDATION SYSTEM RATHER THAN A MONOLITHIC | | | FOUNDATION SYSTEM. SEE PAGE 2 OF REPORT.DRAWINGS SHOW | | | MONOLITHIC FOOTING. ENGINEER OF RECORD TO AKNOWLEDGE | | | THAT HE REVIEWED THE SOIL TEST REPORT AND DECIDES TO | | | USE MONOLITHIC FOOTING EVEN THOUGH SOILS ENGINEER | | | RECOMMENDS STEM WALL SYSTEM.ENGINEER OF RECORD TO | | | PROVIDE LETTER ADDRESSING THIS ISSUE. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY | | | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | 4- REMAINDER: COMPLETE TRUSS PACKAGE WILL NEED TO BE | | | PROVIDED FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. SEE SEC. | | | R802.10 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE FOR REQUIRED | | | INFORMATION TO BE INCLUDED. | | | | | | 5- SHOW IN PLANS AND ELEVATIONS ALL SPECIFIC LOCATION | | | OF VENTILATION OPENINGS. ALSO, SPECIFY SIZE TO VERIFY | | | COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R806.2 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL | | | CODE. CALCULATIONS SHOWN ONLY SAYS THAT NEED 3S.F.. | | | THAT'S WHY NEED SPECIFIC SIZE AND NUMBER OF VENTS TO | | | VERIFY COMPLIANCE. | | | ***NOTE: VENTS SHALL PROVIDE TOTAL NET FREE VENTILATING | | | AREA. | | | | | | 6- ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS NEED TO BE REVIEWED AND | | | APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD AS | | | REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. . | | | ENGINEER'S STAMP ALONE IS NOT ACCEPTABLE.ENGINEER | | | NEEDS TO APPROVE IN WRITING THE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS | | | REQUIRED BY SEC. ABOVE. | | | | | | 7- PROVIDE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY RULE | | | 9B-72 FOR: | | | A) WINDOW MULLIONS. NEED COPY OF APPROVED FLORIDA | | | PRODUCT APPROVAL #261 WITH THE APPROVED APPLICATION | | | STATUS. ONE SUBMITTED SAYS VALIDATED.PRODUCT MUST BE | | | APPROVED TO BE USED. | | | | | | B) FLAT ROOF SYSTEM: | | | * NEED TO IDENTIFY SPECIFIC APPROVED ASSEMBLY TO BE | | | INSTALLED. SEE LIST OF APPROVED ASSEMBLIES ON DADE | | | COUNTY NOA REPORT. | | | ** IF SYSTEM IS LIMITED BY GENERAL LIMITATION #7, | | | THEN NEED TO PROVIDE RAS 117 CALCULATIONS. CALCULATIONS | | | SUBMITTED ARE DONE BY THE HOUSE OWNER (LARRY LUNDER) | | | AND ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE UNLESS THE OWNER IS ONE OF THE | | | PROFESSIONALS LISTED IN THE GENERAL LIMITATION #7. | | | *** IF SYSTEM IS LIMITED BY GENERAL LIMITATION #9, | | | THEN THE SYSTEM MAY NOT BE USED IN THIS REGION BECAUSE | | | THE DESIGN PRESSURES ARE TOO LOW AND THEY CANN'T BE | | | ENHANCED. SEE GENERAL LIMITATION #9 ON LAST PAGE OF | | | DADE COUNTY NOA 02-0212.07 SUBMITTED. | | | ****NOTE: KEEP IN MIND THAT SELECTED ASSEMBLY NEEDS | | | TO BE AN INSULATED ONE AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. | | | | | | C) SIMPSON CONNECTOR SPH6. PROVIDE FLORIDA PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL COVER PAGE FOR 2004 VERSION. ONE SUBMITTED IS | | | FOR 2001 VERSION. PROVIDE ONLY THE FLORIDA PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL COVER PAGE FOR 2004 VERSION AND THE SPECIFIC | | | PAGE WITH THE SELECTED CONNECTOR. | | | | | | 8- ON FIRST SUBMITTAL ALL DOORS AND WINDOWS PRODUCT | | | APPROVALS WERE FOR IMPACT GLAZING. NOW THE ONLY PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL SUBMITTED FORIMPACT GLAZING IS FOR THE FIXED | | | WINDOWS. CLARIFY IF ONLY THE FIXED WINDOWS WILL HAVE | | | IMPACT GLASS, THEN HOW ARE THE OTHER WINDOWS GOING TO | | | BE PROTECTED. PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR STORM | | | SHUTTERS INCLUDING PRODUCT APPROVAL, KEY PLAN AND | | | COMPLETE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE. SEE ATTACHED SAMPLE. | | | | | | 9- SHEET 2/3: | | | A) TYPICAL WALL SECTION: REVISE SPECIFIED FASTENERS | | | FOR MTS20. SEE LATEST SIMPSON CATALOGUE. OTHERWISE, | | | PROVIDE COMPLETE ENGINEERING ANALYSIS FOR FASTENERS AND | | | UPLIFT LOADS THAT DIFFER FROM THOSE TESTED AND | | | PUBLISHED BY THE MANUFACTURER. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY | | | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | B) CLARIFY ROOF TRUSSES SPACING. ROOF FRAMING PLAN | | | SAYS 24"O.C. WHILE TYPICAL WALL SECTION SAYS 16"O.C.. | | | REVISE AS REQUIRED. ALSO, TYP. WALL SECTION CALLS FOR | | | FLOOR TRUSSES INSTEAD OF ROOF TRUSSES. | | | | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | (561)805-6712 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-10-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2006-10-12 |
Time |
18:00 |
Rev Time |
3.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2006-10-12 |
Time |
17:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2006-10-12 18:10:23 | BUILDING REVIEW CHECKLIST: | | | 1- SPECIFY SAFETY GLASS BY MASTER BATH BATHTUB. SEC. | | | R308.4 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | | | | | 2- UPDATE STRUCTURAL NOTE #2(C). NEED TO REFERENCE ASCE | | | 7-02 NOT ASCE 7-98. | | | | | | 3- REVISE STRUCTURAL NOTE #14. NAIL SIZE IS NOT LONG | | | ENOUGH ACCORDING TO ASTM C-926 AND ASTM C-1063. NEED | | | FASTENER THAT IS LONG ENOUGH TO PROVIDE MIN. EMBEDMENT | | | OF 1 3/4" INTO TRUSS. REVISE AS REQUIRED. ALSO, CLARIFY | | | NOTE REGARDING VENTING. STUCCO SOFFIT HAS NOTHING TO DO | | | WITH PLYWOOD VENTING? | | | | | | 4- OWES $4.46 FOR RADON FEES. | | | | | | 5- SOIL TEST REPORT SUBMITTED: | | | A) NEED 2 COPIES WITH ORIGINAL SEAL, SIGNATURE AND | | | DATE AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 471 FLORIDA STATUTES.B) | | | NEED ENGINEERING FIRM CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION IN | | | THE REPORT LETTERHEAD AS REQUIRED BY FLORIDA | | | ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SEC. 61G15-23.002. SEE ATTACHED | | | COPY. | | | C) REPORT SAYS THAT PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION IS MASONRY. | | | PLANS SHOW WOOD FRAME CONSTRUCTION. CLARIFY AND REVISE | | | AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 6- TRUSS DRAWINGSWILL NEED TO BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO | | | INSTALLATION AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R802.10 OF 2004 | | | FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | | | | | 7- SURVEY WITH PROPOSED ADDITION DON'T MATCH PLANS. | | | REVISE AS REQUIRED. ONLY 2 COPIES REQUIRED. SEE | | | COMMENTS FROM ZONING REVIEW. | | | | | | 8- ENERGY CALCULATIONS PAGE 2.MINIMUM INSULATION | | | REQUIRED FOR 2"X6" WALL IS R-19, NOT R-11. REVISE AS | | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | 9- REVISE TYPICAL WALL SECTION ON DRAWING 2/3 TO | | | REFLECT THE R-19 INSULATION AS REQUIRED BY ENERGY | | | CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | 10- SHOW IN PLANS SPECIFIC LOCATION AND SIZE OF | | | VENTILATION OPENINGS THAT COMPLY WITH SEC. R806.2. | | | SPECIFICATIONS SHOWN ON PLAN "VENTILATIONTO MATCH | | | EXISTING" IS NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION TO VERIFY | | | COMPLIANCE. PROVIDE VENTILATION CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | 11- ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS NEED TO BE REVIEWED AND | | | APPROVED IN WRITTING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD AS | | | REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | NOAS 03-0514.01 AND 02-0701.12 WERE SIGNED AND SEALED | | | BY AN ARCHITECT WHO HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS JOB. ON | | | THE OTHER HAND,NOA'S NO NEED TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED | | | AND ONLY THE PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBLE OF THE DESIGN OF | | | THE PRODUCT IS ALLOWED TO SIGN AND SEAL IT. | | | | | | 12- ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS NEED TO BE APPROVED IN | | | WRITTING BY DESIGNER OF RECORD FOR THIS PROJECT. BUCK | | | ENGINEERING STAMP ALONE IS NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION TO | | | SHOW ENGINEER'S APPROVAL.STAMP DOESN'T IDENTIFY WHAT | | | IS THE STAMP FOR AND IS NOT SIGNED/INITIALIZED BY THE | | | ENGINEER.CLEARLY SPECIFY THAT PRODUCT WAS REVIEWED | | | AND APPROVEDAS REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 OF CITY | | | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | 13- BUCK ENGINEERING INC NEED TO PROVIDE THE FIRM | | | CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION AS REQUIRED BY FLORIDA | | | ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SEC. 61G15-23.002. SEE ATTACHED | | | COPY. | | | | | | 14- PROVIDE FLORIDA OR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR:A) | | | SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. NEED TO PROVIDE NOA THAT MATCHES | | | ONE SUBMITTED FOR FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL FL 239. | | | | | | B) WINDOW MULLIONS. NEED TO PROVIDE NOA THAT MATCHES | | | ONE SUBMITTED FOR FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL FL 261. | | | ALSO, NOA 02-0701.05 SUBMITTED EXPIRED ON 06/28/06. | | | | | | C) FLAT ROOF SYSTEM. | | | * NEED TO IDENTIFY SPECIFIC APPROVED ASSEMBLY FROM THE | | | NOA TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE DESIGN PRESSURES. *** | | | NOTE: KEEP IN MIND THAT PLANS CALL FOR INSULATED | | | ASSEMBLY. SEE TYPICAL WALL SECTION IN PLANS. **NEED TO | | | PROVIDE RAS 117 CALCULATIONS DONE ONLY BY ANY OF THE | | | PROFESSIONALS LISTED ON GENERAL LIMITATION #7 OF | | | PRODUCT APPROVAL. SEE LAST PAGE OF THE NOA. | | | | | | D) FIXED WINDOWS. NEED TO PROVIDE NOA THAT MATCHES | | | ONE SUBMITTED FOR FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL FL 243.NOA | | | 01-0102.01 EXPIRED ON 09/13/06. | | | | | | E) ALL SIMPSON CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON PLANS AND | | | DETAILS. SEE PLANS. PROVIDE ONLY THE FLORIDA PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL COVER PAGE AND DRAWING SHOWING SPECIFIC | | | CONNECTORS. NO NEED TO INCLUDE COMPLETEREPORT. | | | | | | 15- WEST ELEVATION ON SHEET 1/3 SHOWS MASTER BEDROOM | | | DOOR AS 8'-0" HIGH DOOR. FLOOR PLAN CALLS FOR 6'-8" | | | HIGH DOOR. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. | | | | | | 16- SHEET 2/3: | | | A) TYPICAL WALL SECTION : REVISE FASTENER FOR MTS20 | | | CONNECTOR SPECIFIED. THIS IS WOOD FRAME CONSTRUCTION, | | | NOT MASONRY. THEREFORE TITEN FASTENERS ARE NOT USED. | | | SEE CATALOGUE FOR PROPER NUMBER AND TYPE OF FATENERS. | | | | | | B) TRUSS TIE DOWN SCHEDULE: SEE CURRENT CATALOGUE AND | | | REVISE NUMBER,TYPEAND DESIGN PRESSURESFOR ALL | | | CONNECTORS. OTHERWISE, PROVIDE COMPLETE ENGINEERING | | | ANALYSIS FOR NUMBERS THAT DIFFER FROM THOSE TESTED AND | | | PUBLISHED BY THE MANUFACTURER. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY | | | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | (561)805-6712 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-06-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-06-19 |
Time |
07:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-06-19 |
Time |
07:15 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2006-11-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2006-11-14 |
Time |
08:07 |
Rev Time |
0.75 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2006-11-14 |
Time |
06:38 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2006-09-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2006-09-27 |
Time |
18:05 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2006-09-27 |
Time |
17:50 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
HIST |
HISTORICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2006-09-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ssherman |
Date |
2006-09-11 |
Time |
11:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ssherman |
Date |
2006-09-11 |
Time |
11:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2006-09-11 00:00:00 | HISTORICAL APPROVAL NO FEE PER GALINA | | | JUDGE |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
11 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-08-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-08-28 |
Time |
11:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-08-28 |
Time |
11:31 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-08-28 11:32:11 | TO "JGOMEZ" DESK/SUBMITTAL |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
10 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-06-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-06-18 |
Time |
09:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-06-18 |
Time |
09:52 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-06-18 09:56:03 | TO "BTROBAUG" DESK/REV |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
9 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-05-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-05-25 |
Time |
09:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-05-25 |
Time |
09:41 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-05-25 09:41:39 | TO "M" BOX/SUBMITTAL |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
8 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-04-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-04-27 |
Time |
11:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-04-27 |
Time |
11:45 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-04-27 11:46:05 | TO "JWITMER" DESK/SUBMITTAL |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-04-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-04-17 |
Time |
11:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-04-17 |
Time |
11:52 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-04-17 11:53:17 | TO "JGOMEZ" DESK/SUBMITTAL |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-02-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-02-05 |
Time |
13:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-02-05 |
Time |
13:34 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-02-05 13:34:44 | TO "JGOMEZ" DESK/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-01-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-01-29 |
Time |
17:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-01-29 |
Time |
17:56 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-01-29 17:57:12 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-11-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-11-12 |
Time |
12:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-11-12 |
Time |
12:45 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-11-12 12:45:30 | TO "BTROBAUG" DESK/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-11-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-11-08 |
Time |
15:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-11-08 |
Time |
15:31 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-11-08 15:32:06 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-09-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-09-19 |
Time |
09:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-09-19 |
Time |
09:19 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-09-19 00:00:00 | TO "E" BOX |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-10-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2006-10-12 |
Time |
18:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2006-09-11 |
Time |
12:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2006-09-11 00:00:00 | TO "Z" BOX |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-06-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-06-19 |
Time |
09:51 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-06-19 |
Time |
09:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-06-19 09:52:19 | REVISION TO MECH. PLANS PAGE 3/3. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-05-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-05-25 |
Time |
15:58 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-05-25 |
Time |
15:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-05-25 15:59:42 | SUBMITTAL REVISION ATTACHED TO MECHANICAL PLANS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2006-11-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2006-11-14 |
Time |
13:58 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2006-11-14 |
Time |
13:58 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-11-14 13:59:49 | RESTAMP MECH. PLANS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2006-10-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2006-10-06 |
Time |
11:04 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2006-10-06 |
Time |
11:04 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2006-11-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mperson |
Date |
2006-11-14 |
Time |
10:50 |
Rev Time |
0.33 |
| Received By |
mperson |
Date |
2006-11-14 |
Time |
10:50 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-10-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mperson |
Date |
2006-10-05 |
Time |
16:10 |
Rev Time |
0.45 |
| Received By |
mperson |
Date |
2006-10-05 |
Time |
16:10 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-10-05 00:00:00 | ******UNSAT****** | | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS REQUIRED | | | FOR PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW: | | | | | | 1. PER FBC-2004,PLUMBING, SECTION 905.3 | | | VENT CONNECTIONS TO DRAINAGE SYSTEM. | | | EVERY DRY VENT CONNECTING TO A | | | HORIZONTAL DRAIN SHALL CONNECT ABOVE THE | | | CENTERLINE OF THE HORIZONTAL DRAIN PIPE. | | | PLEASE REFERENCE THE CORRECTED SANITARY | | | PLUMBING LAYOUT AND SANITARY ISOMETRIC | | | RISER DIAGRAM IN RED INK ON SHEET 3/3 | | | FOR RESUBMITTAL. | | | | | | **IN ORDER TO EXPIDITE PLAN REVIEW: WHEN | | | RESUBMITTING, PLEASE REPLACE ONLY SHEETS | | | WHICH HAVE CHANGED AND PROVIDE ONE COPY | | | OF ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS FOR REFERENCE | | | ONLY. NOTE: ONLY ONE CORRECTED DRAWING | | | IN RED INK FOR REFERENCE FOR | | | RESUBMITTAL. | | | | | | END OF COMMENTS: | | | | | | REVIEW BY MIKE PERSON | | | (561) 805-6730 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | | UNDER SUPERVISION OF K.STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-02-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mmclean |
Date |
2007-02-02 |
Time |
14:13 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mmclean |
Date |
2007-02-02 |
Time |
13:10 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-02-02 14:13:11 | PROVISO: THE PROPOSED ADDITION MUST NOT BE USED FOR | | | SEPARATE LIVING SPACE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2006-11-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mmclean |
Date |
2006-11-11 |
Time |
14:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mmclean |
Date |
2006-11-11 |
Time |
14:12 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-11-11 14:14:12 | PROVISO: THE PROPOSED ADDITION MUST NOT BE USED FOR | | | SEPARATE LIVING SPACE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-09-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mmclean |
Date |
2006-09-16 |
Time |
13:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mmclean |
Date |
2006-09-16 |
Time |
13:48 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-09-16 00:00:00 | DENIED, | | | 1. PLEASE SHOW THE PROPOSED ADDITION ON | | | THE CURRENT SURVEY (8/17/06) ONLY TWO | | | COPIES IS NEEDED FOR REVIEW. | | | | | | | | | NOTE: THE PROPOSED ADDITION CANNOT BE | | | USED AS A SEPARATE LIVING SPACE. | | | | | | MICHELLE MCLEAN | | | ZONING TECHNICIAN | | | 805-6720 |
|
|