| Plan Review Stops For Permit 06080304 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-07-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-07-10 |
Time |
15:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-07-10 |
Time |
15:08 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-07-10 15:33:34 | BUILDING REVIEW 3RD CHECKLIST: | | | | | | 1- NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT WAS RECORDED ON 03/02/07. PER | | | FLORIDA STATUTE SEC. 713.13IT EXPIRES AFTER 90 DAYS | | | OF RECORDING IF WORK IS NOT STARTED. THEREFORE, NEED TO | | | RE-RECORD THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AND RE-SUBMIT TO | | | THIS OFFICE. | | | | | | 2- FLOOD ELEVATION CERTIFICATE SUBMITTED IS NOT | | | REQUIRED FOR A BUILDING LOCATED IN A "C" FLOOD ZONE. | | | | | | 3- NEED TO PROVIDE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED | | | BY SEC. 13-600 FBC 2004. | | | ***NOTE:MAKE SURE 2006 REVISED FORM IS USED. | | | | | | 4- NOW IS NOT CLEAR IF WINDOWS WITH IMPACT GLAZING WILL | | | BE USED OR IF STORM PANELS WILL BE USED. BOTH PRODUCT | | | APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED.SUBMIT ONLY PRODUCT APPROVAL | | | FOR EITHER ONE. | | | IF USING STORM SHUTTERS THEN, COMPLETE INSTALLATION | | | SCHEDULE SHOWING SPECIFICMOUNTING CONDITIONS AND | | | ANCHOR TYPE AND SPACING TO BE USED WILL BE REQUIRED. | | | SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | 5- PLANS NOW SHOW ROOF SHINGLES INSTEAD OF FLAT ROOF | | | ASSEMBLY. | | | THEN, AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 NEED TO PROVIDE | | | PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR SHINGLES TO BE INSTALLED. | | | | | | 6-SHINGLES PRODUCT APPROVAL TO BE REVIEWED AND | | | APPROVE IN WRITING BY ENGINEER OF RECORD AS REQUIRED BY | | | SEC. 106.3.3CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | 7- ROOF PITCH WAS REVISED TO HAVE 2:12 PITCH. | | | THEREFORE,NEED TO SPECIFY TWO LAYERS OF UNDERLAYMENT | | | AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R905.2.2 OF 2004 FLORIDA | | | RESIDENTIAL CODE ALONG WITH 2006 REVISIONS. | | | | | | 8- SHEET 4: | | | A) SPECIFY SIZE (HOW LONG) ARE THE ANCHOR BOLTS USED | | | TO SUPPORT WALL LEDGER TO EXISTING WALL. SEC. 106.1.2 | | | CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | B) SPECIFY HOW IS THEROOF GOING TO HAVE CROSS | | | VENTILATION'S AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R806 OF 2004 FLORIDA | | | RESIDENTIAL CODE.R-19 INSULATION DOESN'T ALLOW AN AIR | | | GAP SPACINGFOR CROSS VENTILATION IF IT'S INSTALLED IN | | | A 2X6 JOIST.SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | C) SPECIFY SIZE (HOW LONG) ARE THE BOLTS FOR | | | CONNECTORS HTT22 SPECIFIED ON TYPICAL WALL SECTION. | | | SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004 ANDSIMPSON | | | CATALOG. | | | | | | 9- REVISE ROOF SHEATHING MINIMUM TYPE OF NAIL TO BE | | | USED. NEED TO USEMIN. 8D RING SHANK NAILS.SEE 2006 | | | REVISED SEC. R803.2.3.1 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL | | | CODE AND REVISE PLANS AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 10- WHYDID ENGINEER SIGNED PLANS WITH 8/16/07 DATE?. | | | | | | | | | ***NOTE: ONE COPY OF THESE PLANS WILL BE RETAINED IN | | | THIS OFFICE TO BE SENT TO THE BOARD OF ENGINEERS FOR | | | REVIEW. | | | | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | (561)805-6712 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-01-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-01-08 |
Time |
18:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-01-08 |
Time |
17:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-01-08 19:00:11 | BUILDING REVIEW SECOND CHECKLIST: | | | 1- NEED RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AS REQUIRED BY | | | SEC. 713.13 FLORIDA STATUTES. | | | | | | 2- A) REVISE SURVEY. FLOOD ZONE IS "C" PER COMMUNITY | | | PANEL 120229 0015 B OF MARCH 1ST, 1979. NOTX N/A. B) | | | BOTH COPIES TO HAVE ORIGINAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE AS | | | REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 472 FLORIDA STATUTES. | | | | | | 3- NEED ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 13 | | | FBC 2004. | | | | | | 4- 24 SH WINDOW DOESN'T COMPLY WITH BEDROOM EGRESS | | | REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. R310.1.2 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL | | | CODE. | | | | | | 5- A) PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR STORM SHUTTERS. | | | NEED A KEY PLAN AND COMPLETE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE. SEE | | | ATTACHED SAMPLE OF INSTALLATION SCHEDULE THAT CONTAINS | | | ALL NECESSARY INFORMATION TO PERFORM PLAN REVIEW.OR | | | PROVIDE ANY OTHER MEANS WHICH WILL SHOW ALL THE | | | REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR PLAN REVIEW. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY | | | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | B) PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR STORM SHUTTERS. | | | ENGINEER TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IT IN WRITING (NOT | | | SIGNING AND SEALING) AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 108.3 CITY | | | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | 6- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE | | | 9B-72 FOR : | | | FLAT ROOF SYSTEM: | | | A)IDENTIFY SPECIFIC APPROVED ASSEMBLY TO BE | | | INSTALLED, SPECIFIC FASTENING OPTION. IF SELECTED | | | SYSTEM IS LIMITED BY GENERAL LIMITATION #7, THEN | | | PROVIDE INFORMATION AS REQUESTEDON GENERAL LIMITATION | | | #7.IF SELECTED APPROVED ASSEMBLY IS LIMITED BY | | | GENERAL LIMITATION #9, THEN SYSTEM MAY NOT BE USED | | | BECAUSE LIMITATION #9 DOESN'T ALLOW NAIL ENHANCINGAS | | | REQUIRED AT PERIMETER AND CORNER AREAS. SEE GENERAL | | | LIMITATIONS ON PRODUCT APPROVAL. SEE ATTACHED COPY OF | | | CITY POLICY FOR ROOFING PERMITS AND PROVIDE ALL | | | REQUIRED INFORMATION. | | | | | | B) SPECIFY BASE SHEET FASTENING OPTION ON SELECTED | | | APPROVED ASSEMBLY. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC | | | 2004. | | | | | | C) ENGINEER TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 108.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO | | | FBC 2004. | | | | | | 7- BUILDING PERMIT VALUATION WAS TOO LOW. IT WAS | | | UPDATED TO $30,788. OWES $1670.98 FOR PERMIT VALUATION | | | AND RADON FEES. | | | | | | 8- SHEET 4: | | | A) SPECIFY SIZE (HOW LONG, HOW MUCH EMBEDMENT) FOR | | | ANCHOR BOLT AT EXISTING WALL LEDGER. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY | | | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | B) GIVEN THE TYPE OF ROOF NEED TO PROVIDE CONTINUOUS | | | RIDGE VENT IN ORDER TO PROVIDEVENTILATION. (3) 8"X16" | | | SPREADED VENTS DON'T PROVIDE CROSS VENTILATION BETWEEN | | | THE SOLID JOIST.SEC. R806 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL | | | CODE. REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | C) SPECIFY SIZE (HOW LONG, HOW MUCH EMBEDMENT) FOR | | | HTT22 CONNECTOR. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC | | | 2004. | | | | | | D) SPECIFY CALCULATED DESIGN PRESSURES FOR EXTERIOR | | | DOOR BY UTILITY AREA. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO | | | FBC 2004 AND SEC. R301 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | | | | | E) DESIGN PRESSURES CALCULATIONS FOR WINDOWS ARE TOO | | | LOW ACCORDING TO WINDOW SIZE AND LOCATION. PROVIDE | | | ACTUAL CALCULATIONS SHOWING HOW DESIGN PRESSURES WERE | | | CALCULATED. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TOFBC | | | 2004. | | | | | | 9- CONTRACTOR TO UPDATE THE LICENSE RECORDS WITH THE | | | PERMIT CLERK. | | | | | | 10- SPECIFY LEVEL OF ALTERATION AS REQUIRED BY SECTION | | | 301.5 OF 2004 FLORIDA EXISTING BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | (561)805-6712 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-09-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2006-09-15 |
Time |
14:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2006-09-15 |
Time |
07:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2006-09-15 00:00:00 | BUILDING REVIEW CHECKLIST: | | | 1- NEED RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. | | | | | | 2- BRING DRAWINGS TO PALM BEACH COUNTY | | | FOR IMPACT FEES. BRING BACK STAMPED | | | DRAWINGS AND COPY OF PAID RECEIPT. | | | | | | 3- A) SURVEY NOTE #8 STATES THAT THIS | | | SURVEY CAN NOT BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION | | | PURPOSES. PROVIDE REVISED SURVEY. | | | B) FLOOD ZONE IS "C" NOT X N/A. REVISE | | | SURVEY AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 4- NEED SMOKE DETECTORS AS REQUIRED BY | | | SECTIONS R311.1 AND R313.1.1 OF 2004 | | | RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | | | | | 5- NEED ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED | | | BY CHAPTER 13 FBC 2004. | | | | | | 6- PLANS ARE NOT CLEAR. NEED LEGEND TO | | | IDENTIFY WHICH WALLS ARE NEW, WHICH ARE | | | EXISTING AND WHICH ONES ARE GOING TO BE | | | REMOVED. SECTION 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS | | | TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | 7- NEED TO SPECIFY SIZE OF WINDOWS AND | | | DOORS. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO | | | FBC 2004. | | | | | | 8- ENGINEER TO SPECIFY ALL DESIGN | | | CRITERIA AS REQUIRED BY SECTION R301 | | | 2004 RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | | | | | 9- SPECIFY ROOF SHEATHING THICKNESS AND | | | FASTENING. SEE TABLE 2304.9.1 FBC 2004. | | | | | | 10- A) PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR | | | STORM SHUTTERS. NEED KEY PLAN AN A | | | COMPLETE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE. SEE | | | ATTACHED INSTALLATION SCHEDULE SAMPLE | | | FROM THE CITY IMPLEMENTATION STANDARD | | | FOR WIND-BORNE DEBRIS IMPACT PROTECTION. | | | B) PROVIDE FLORIDA OR LOCAL PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL FOR STORM SHUTTERS. | | | | | | 11- ENGINEER TO IDENTIFY SPECIFIC LEVEL | | | OF ALTERATION THAT APPLIES TO THIS HOUSE | | | AS REQ'D BY SEC. 301.5 0F 2004 FLORIDA | | | EXISTING BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | 12- PROVIDE FLORIDA OR LOCAL PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL FOR: | | | A) FLAT ROOF SYSTEM. | | | ***NOTE: NEED TO IDENTIFY SPECIFIC FLAT | | | ROOF APPROVED ASSEMBLY AND COMPLY WITH | | | GENERAL LIMITATION #7 OR #9 AS REQUIRED. | | | SEE ATTACHED COPY OF CITY POLICY FOR | | | ROOFING PERMITS. | | | B) ALL STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS SPECIFIED | | | ON PLANS.SEE PLANS AND DETAILS. | | | | | | 13- ENGINEER TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN | | | WRITTING ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS | | | REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMNTS | | | TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | 14- BUILDING PERMIT VALUATION DECLARED | | | ON THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS | | | UNDERESTIMATED. PROVIDE CORRECT | | | VALUATION OR IT WILL BE ESTIMATED AS | | | DESCRIBED IN SEC. 108.3 CITY AMENDMENTS | | | TO FBC 2004. | | | | | | 15- ONLY TWO SETS OF DRAWINGS AND | | | PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE REQUIRED. | | | | | | 16- TYPICAL WALL SECTION: | | | A) R-30 INSULATION DOESN'T FIT IN 2X6 | | | RAFTERS. REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | B) R-19 INSULATIONDOESN'T FIT IN 2X4 | | | STUDS. REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | C) WOOD NEED TO BE MIN. 6" ABOVE GRADE | | | AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R319.1(5). REVISE | | | WALL SECTION AS REQUIRED. | | | D) SPECIFY SIZE OF BOLT SPECIFIED TO | | | ATTACH LEDGER TO EXISTING WALL. SEC. | | | 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | E) SPECIFY ROOF VENTILATION AS REQUIRED | | | BY SEC. R806 2004 RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | | F) CLARIFY NOTE REGARDING TRUSS | | | ATTACHED WITH MTS12. THERE ARE NOT | | | TRUSSES IN THIS ROOF. REVISE AS | | | REQUIRED. | | | G) PROVIDE DETAIL SHOWING HOW IS THE | | | SIMPSON MSTA12 ATTACHED TO 2X4 STUD AT | | | BOTTOM?. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | 17- WIND LOAD DRAWINGS ON SHEET #3 ARE | | | FOR SLIDING GLASS DOORS AND GARAGE | | | DOORS. THERE ARE NOT THESE TYPES OF | | | DOORS IN THIS PROJECT AND DRAWINGS ARE | | | NOT LEGIBLE. | | | | | | 18- REVISE DOOR AND WINDOW JAMB DETAILS. | | | TYPICAL WALL SECTIONS SPECIFIES 2X4 | | | FRAMING, WHILE DETAILS CALL FOR 2X6. | | | REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 19- CONTRACTOR TO UPDATE THE LICENSE | | | RECORDS WITH THE PERMIT CLERK. | | | | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | (561)805-6712 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-07-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-07-05 |
Time |
07:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-07-05 |
Time |
06:43 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-07-05 07:08:56 | | | | NONCOMPLIANT | | | | | | PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS FOR CODE | | | COMPLIANCE AND RESUBMIT FOR REVIEW. | | | | | | 1 } DUE TO THE METER LOCATION, A DISCONNECT IS REQUIRED | | | PER 230.70(A)(1) UNLESS THE FEED FROM THE METER TO THE | | | PANEL IS UNDERGROUND. INDICATE LOCATION ON PLAN. | | | | | | 2} PANELS "B" AND "C" ARE LISTED ON THE PANEL SCHEDULE. | | | LOCATE ALL EQUIPMENT ON THE PLAN. | | | | | | 3} PER 110.9 AND 110.10: OBTAIN THE | | | AVAILABLE FAULT CURRENT AT THE UTILITY | | | AND CALCULATE THE SAME AT THE EQUIPMENT. | | | INDICATE THE AIC RATING FOR THE | | | EQUIPMENT IS EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN | | | THE AVAILABLE FAULT. | | | | | | 4} GIVE PANEL SPECIFICATIONS, NUMBER OF SPACES, VOLTAGE | | | AND AMPERE RATING, MAIN LUG OR MAIN BREAKER. | | | | | | 5} PROVIDE LOAD CALCULATIONS PER ARTICLE 220 PART III, | | | STANDARD OR PART IV OPTIONAL, INDICATE METHOD USED. THE | | | CALCULATION GIVEN INDICATES MORE LOAD OPN THE NUETRAL | | | THAN ON THE UNGROUNDED CONDUCTORS, WHICH CANNOT BE | | | CORRECT. | | | | | | 6} THE PERSON TAKING RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE DESIGN MUST | | | PRINT AND SIGN THEIR NAME TO SAME PER 106.3.4.3. FBC. | | | IF AN ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER, COMPLY WITH 418 AND 417 | | | FS, RESPECTIVELY. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL. | | | | | | BILL TROBAUGH | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW. | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561/805-6718 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2006-12-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2006-12-19 |
Time |
17:56 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2006-12-19 |
Time |
17:45 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-08-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2006-08-15 |
Time |
12:26 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2006-08-15 |
Time |
08:14 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-08-15 00:00:00 | | | | | | | NONCOMPLIANT | | | | | | PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS | | | FOR CODE COMPLIANCE AND RESUBMIT FOR | | | REVIEW. | | | | | | 1} SHOW THE PHYSICAL LOCATION OF ALL | | | SERVICE EQUIPMENT ON THE PLAN. 215.5. | | | | | | 2} PROVIDE A RISER DIAGRAM WITH | | | CONDUCTOR AND CONDUIT SIZE AND TYPE, | | | GROUNDING DETAILS, LOAD CALCULATIONS, | | | PANEL SCHEDULES, SERVICE EQUIPMENT AND | | | PANEL LOCATIONS PER 106.3.5.4 FBC. | | | | | | 3} PLEASE LOCATE ALL SERVICE EQUIPMENT | | | ON THE PLAN, METER ENCLOSURE, | | | DISCONNECTS AND PANELS, SO THAT | | | COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLES 225 AND 230 CAN | | | BE REVIEWED. | | | | | | 4} SMOKE DETECTORS MUST BE INSTALLED TO | | | COMPLY WITH R313.1 RESIDENTIAL FLORIDA | | | BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | BILL TROBAUGH | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | | 561/805-6718 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-07-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-07-02 |
Time |
14:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-07-02 |
Time |
14:55 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-07-02 14:55:59 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-12-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-12-16 |
Time |
16:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-12-16 |
Time |
16:32 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-12-16 16:32:45 | TO "BTROBAUG" DESK/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-12-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-12-07 |
Time |
11:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-12-07 |
Time |
11:40 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-12-07 11:40:48 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-08-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-08-12 |
Time |
16:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-08-12 |
Time |
16:32 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-08-12 00:00:00 | TO "E" BOX |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-09-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2006-09-15 |
Time |
14:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2006-08-07 |
Time |
11:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2006-08-07 00:00:00 | TO "Z" BOX |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-07-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-07-05 |
Time |
15:53 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-07-05 |
Time |
15:53 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-07-05 16:00:32 | *** DENIED *** | | | 1) AS REQUESTED IN LAST TWO REVIEWS 9-20-06 AND | | | 12-20-06, SUBMIT ENERGY CALCULATIONS, SEE 2004 FBC | | | 13-101.2.2. | | | | | | 2)SEE ATTACHED NOTICE FS 553.80 (2) (B) REGARDING | | | FOUR TIMES THE FEE. | | | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-12-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2006-12-20 |
Time |
16:23 |
Rev Time |
0.30 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2006-12-20 |
Time |
16:23 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-12-20 16:26:22 | *** DENIED *** | | | AS REQUESTED IN LAST REVIEW 9-12-06. | | | 1) NO MECHANICAL PLANS SUBMITTED, PLEASE | | | SUBMIT MECHANICAL PLANS FOR REVIEW, PER 2004 FBC WPB | | | AMEND. 106.3.5.4 (10). | | | | | | 2) PLEASE SUBMIT ENERGY CALCULATIONS FOR | | | ADDITION YOU MAY USE FORM 600C-04. | | | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-09-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2006-09-12 |
Time |
11:59 |
Rev Time |
0.20 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2006-09-12 |
Time |
11:59 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-09-12 00:00:00 | *** DENIED *** | | | 1) NO MECHANICAL PLANS SUBMITTED, PLEASE | | | SUBMIT MECHANICAL PLANS FOR REVIEW. | | | | | | 2) PLEASE SUBMIT ENERGY CALCULATIONS FOR | | | ADDITION YOU MAY USE FORM 600C-04. | | | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-07-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleech |
Date |
2007-07-05 |
Time |
15:13 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jleech |
Date |
2007-07-05 |
Time |
14:54 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-07-05 15:20:48 | DENIED; | | | PAGE 2 SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM; THE AUTOMATIC CLOTHES | | | WASHER MUST DISCHARGE DOWN STREAM OF THE BATROOM GROUP. | | | SEE FBC-2004 PLUMBING SECTION 909.1 WATER CLOSET STUB | | | UP NOT SHOWN IN MASTER BATH. | | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | JOHN LEECH | | | 805-6695 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-01-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleech |
Date |
2007-01-03 |
Time |
12:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jleech |
Date |
2007-01-03 |
Time |
12:35 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-09-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleech |
Date |
2006-09-12 |
Time |
06:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jleech |
Date |
2006-09-12 |
Time |
06:58 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-09-12 00:00:00 | DENIED; | | | NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION TO DO A PLUMBING | | | PLAN REVIEW. | | | 1. A SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM IS REQUIRED. | | | SHOW ALL PIPE SIZES FOR DRAINAGE AND | | | VENTING, WHERE BRANCH DRAINS TIE INTO | | | EXISTING BUILDING DRAIN. SEE FBC-2004 | | | CHAPTER 1 SECTION 106.3.5.4(9) | | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | JOHN LEECH | | | 805-6695 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-07-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
choops |
Date |
2007-07-03 |
Time |
14:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
choops |
Date |
2007-07-03 |
Time |
14:54 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-07-03 15:07:01 | ***FAILED*** | | | | | | | | | 1)SCOPE OF WORK ON SURVEYS DO NOT MATCH SITE PLANS. | | | | | | 2)PROPOSED MASTER BEDROOM SIDE MUST MAINTAIN A | | | MINIMUM SETBACK OF 5' .THE SURVEY SHOWS IT AT LESS | | | THAN 5' . | | | | | | 3)INCLUDE PROPOSED PATIO IN SCOPE OF WORK ON | | | APPLICATION.MAKE THE ENTIRETY OF THE SCOPE OF WORK | | | VERY CLEAR. | | | | | | 4)INCLUDE EXISTING DRIVEWAY DIMENSIONS.THE | | | PROPOSED PATIO PLUS THE EXISTING DRIVEWAY APPEAR TO | | | EXCEED THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE IMPERMEABLE SURFACE IN THE | | | FRONT YARD.THE SURVEY CALLS IT OUT AS A DIRT DRIVEWAY | | | WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED.AS PER THE CITY OF WEST PALM | | | BEACH ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, SECTION | | | 94-482(A): | | | | | | LOCATION AND SURFACE.REQUIRED OFF-STREET PARKING | | | SPACES FOR LESS THAN FOUR RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS | | | SHALL BE LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY ON WHICH THE UNITS ARE | | | CONSTRUCTED. REQUIRED PARKING MAY BE LOCATED IN A FRONT | | | YARD; HOWEVER, THE LESSER OF 1,000 SQUARE FEET OR 75 | | | PERCENT OF THE FRONT YARD AREA MUST BE LANDSCAPED. | | | PARKING AREAS LOCATED IN THE FRONT YARD SHALL BE | | | SURFACED WITH A SMOOTH, NONDUSTING SURFACE IN | | | COMPLIANCE WITH SUBSECTION 94-485(E). IT SHALL BE A | | | VIOLATION OF THIS CHAPTER TO PARK ON ANY UNPAVED AREAS | | | AS DESCRIBEDIN THIS ARTICLE. | | | | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT CHRIS HOOPS, ZONING | | | TECHNICIAN | | | (561)805-6720 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-12-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mmclean |
Date |
2006-12-15 |
Time |
07:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mmclean |
Date |
2006-12-15 |
Time |
07:21 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-12-15 08:26:16 | DENIED, | | | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE THE DISTANCE OF THE EXISTING | | | STRUCTURE AND PROPOSED THAT IS CLOSER TO THE EXISTING | | | STEEL GARAGE. SEC 94-304(3) BUILDING SEPARATION. 2. | | | PLEASE SHOW THE PROPOSED WORK ON TWO COPIES OF SURVEYS | | | (THE ADDITION) AND SHOW THE DISTANCE FROM THE STEEL | | | GARAGE. | | | 3.THE ELEVATION DOES NOT SHOW THE PATIO AND PRIVACY | | | WALL. HEIGHT OF THE PRIVACY WALL MUST BE 4FT AND NEED | | | TO PROVIDE WALL DETAIL. | | | 4. PLEASE INDICATE IF THERE WILL BE ANY FUTURE ROOF OR | | | ENCLOSING OF PATIO.SEC 94-305 OPEN UNCOVERED PORCHES | | | WHICH ARE THREE FEET OR LESS ABOVE GRADE MAY ENCORACH | | | INTO ANY REQUIRED SETBACK AREA. | | | 5. THE PROPOSED NEW PATIO MUST MEET THE 25FT FRONT | | | SETBACK IF THERE WILL BE FOOTERS/ROOF/ENCLOSED WALLS. | | | (THE EXISTING STRUCTURE SITS 25FT FROM THE FRONT | | | PROPERTY LINE). | | | | | | MICHELLE MCLEAN | | | ZONING TECHNICIAN | | | 805-6720 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-08-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mmclean |
Date |
2006-08-12 |
Time |
09:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mmclean |
Date |
2006-08-12 |
Time |
09:50 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-08-12 00:00:00 | DENIED, | | | 1. PLEASE SHOW THE PROPSED WORK ON THE | | | TWO COPY OF SURVEY (PLEASE MARK/INDICATE) | | | ON THE TWO COPIES OF SURVEYS. | | | 2. ONLY TWO SETS OF PLANS NEEDED FOR | | | REVIEW. PLEASE REMOVE THE EXCESSIVE PLANS. | | | 3. PLEASE PROVIDE THE DISTANCE OF THE | | | ADDITION FROM THE EXISTING STEEL GARAGE. | | | | | | NOTE: SEC 94-304(3) BUILDING SEPARATION | | | COVERED WITH A SOLID ROOF SHALL BE | | | LOCATED NO CLOSER THAN SIX FEET TO THE | | | PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE. | | | | | | 4. PLEASE PROVIDE THE DEMOLISHING PLANS | | | OF WHAT WAS EXISTING TO WHAT IS BEING | | | PROPOSED (FLOOR PLAN) (2 SETS ONLY) | | | 5. ANY PROPOSED WORK MUST MEET THE | | | CURRENT SETBACKS. | | | | | | MICHELLE MCLEAN | | | ZONING TECHNICIAN | | | 805-6720 |
|
|