Plan Review Details - Permit 06080056
Plan Review Stops For Permit 06080056
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2006-10-03 Cont ID  
Sent By amorse Date 2006-10-03 Time 06:41 Rev Time 0.00
Received By amorse Date 2006-10-03 Time 06:41 Sent To PC
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2006-08-14 Cont ID  
Sent By amorse Date 2006-08-14 Time 16:07 Rev Time 0.00
Received By amorse Date 2006-08-14 Time 16:07 Sent To PC
Notes
2006-08-14 00:00:00 
  
 DENIED
  
 1) AN ENGINEER PRACTICING THROUGH A DULY
 AUTHORIZED ENGINEERING BUSINESS SHALL
 INDICATE THEIR NAME AND LICENCE #, AS
 WELL AS THE NAME,ADDRESS AND CERTIFICATE
 OF AUTHORIZATION #ON EACH SHEET PER
 61G15-23.002 (2) FAC
  
 2) THE CLAIMED VALUATION ON THE PERMIT
 APPLICATION IS LOW. FOR PERMITTING
 PURPOSES, VALUATION OF BUILDINGS AND
 SYSTEMS SHALL BE THE TOTAL REPLACEMENT
 COST EXCLUDING LAND VALUE. OUR VALUATION
 REFERENCE IS ICC (BVD), MARSHALL-SWIFT
 AND MEANS COST ANALYSIS SERVICES PER
 108.3 FBC* AVERAGE COST PER MARSHALL &
 SWIFT WAS USED, FEES ARE DUE
  
 BLDG PLAN REVIEW
 ADRIAN MORSE
 561-805-6716
  
  

Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 4 Status N Date 2006-10-02 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2006-10-02 Time 12:03 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2006-10-02 Time 12:03 Sent To B
Notes
2006-10-02 00:00:00TO "AMORSE" DESK/RESUB

Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2006-09-27 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2006-09-27 Time 15:33 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2006-09-27 Time 15:33 Sent To Z
Notes
2006-09-27 00:00:00TO "Z" BOX/RESUB

Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2006-08-10 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2006-08-10 Time 15:57 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2006-08-10 Time 15:56 Sent To B
Notes
2006-08-10 00:00:00TO "MISC" BOX#2

Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 2006-08-14 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2006-08-02 Time 10:32 Sent To  
Notes
2006-08-02 00:00:00TO "Z" BOX

Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2006-09-29 Cont ID  
Sent By mmclean Date 2006-09-29 Time 16:59 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mmclean Date 2006-09-29 Time 16:59 Sent To I
Notes
2006-09-29 00:00:00NOTE: THE PROPOSED FLAG MUST NOT EXCEED
 16SQ FT AND 10FT FROM PEDESTRIAN
 WALKWAY. SEC 94-408(8)A.

Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2006-08-09 Cont ID  
Sent By mmclean Date 2006-08-09 Time 17:12 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mmclean Date 2006-08-09 Time 17:12 Sent To I
Notes
2006-08-09 00:00:00DENIED,
 1. SEC 94.408(8)A - FLAGS SHALL NOT BE
 USED FOR ANY COMMERCIAL PURPOSES,
 INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO PROMOTING
 AND ADVERTISING A BUSINESS OR PRODUCT.
 2. THERE SHOULD BE A MINIMUM OF
 CLEARANCE OF TEN FEET FOR FLAGS PLACED
 ABOVE A PEDESTRAIAN WALKWAY.
 3. MUST PROVIDE A CLEARER AND CURRENT
 SURVEY OF THE COMPLETE PROPERTY AND MARK
 THE SETBACK OF THE FLAGPOLE.
 4. PLEASE PROVIDE THE DIMENSION OF THE
 PROPOSED FLAG AND WHAT THE FLAG WILL
 LOOK LIKE. SIZE OF PROPOSED SIZE SHALL
 NOT EXCEED 16SQ FT.
 5. A SITEPLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS
 INDICATING THE SIZE, NUMBER, LOCATION
 AND METHOD OF INSTALLATION OF ALL
 PRPOSED FLAG MUST BE SUBMITTED.
  
 MICHELLE MCLEAN
 ZONING TECHNICIAN
 805-6720


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved