 |
Plan Review Details - Permit 06071334
| Plan Review Stops For Permit 06071334 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-10-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2007-10-24 |
Time |
11:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2007-10-24 |
Time |
11:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-10-24 12:11:22 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | | FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | | RESIDENTIAL | | | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | | EXISTING BUILDING CODE | | | FBC*CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 | | | | | | **NEW PLANS DRAWN BY NEW DESIGNER** | | | | | | | | | 1.) A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE | | | FILED WITH THE CLERK OF COURTS BEFORE A | | | PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED, FS713.13. | | | | | | 2.) IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM | | | BEACH COUNTY PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE. | | | THE PLANS MUST BE STAMPED AND THE | | | RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE APPLICATION. | | | 561-233-5025 | | | | | | 3.)THE DESCRIPTION FOR 6X6 10/10 WWM HAS CHANGED TO | | | 6X6 W1.4XW1.4, SEE FBC R 506.2.4 EXCEPTION 2.THIS NOW | | | REFERS TO CROSS SECTIONAL AREA RATHER THAN GAUGE; | | | PLEASE REVISE FOUNDATION PLAN SHEET 4. | | | | | | 4.)FOR THE SCREEN LANAI, EITHER PROVIDE ALL | | | SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE SCREEN ENCLOSURE OR A SEPARATE | | | PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED. | | | | | | 5.)THE TYPICAL STAIR DETAIL REFERS TO FBC1007.5.THE | | | CORRECT CODE REFERENCES WILL BE FOUND IN FBC | | | RESIDENTIAL.CHECK ALL CODE REFERENCES. | | | | | | 6.)SHEET 2, WIND INFO, ITEM 6, INTERNAL PRESSURE | | | COEFFICIENT IS "CH".WHAT IS THIS? | | | | | | 7.)ROOF TRUSS PLANS WILL BE REQUIRED, REVIEWED BY | | | ENGINEER OF RECORD, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION | | | (INFORMATIONAL), FBC R 802.1.6.1. | | | | | | 8.)SHOW GUARDRAIL AND STAIR RAIL HEIGHT, FBC R 311.5, | | | 312.STAIR RAIL HEIGHT IS SPECIFIED AS 32" OR 34", BUT | | | DRAWN THE SAME HEIGHT AS THE GUARDRAIL, WHICH HAS A 34" | | | MINIMUM HEIGHT REQUIREMENT. | | | | | | 9.)SPECIFY DESIGN CRITERIA FOR THE GUARDRAIL AT THE | | | BALCONY, FBC312. | | | | | | 10.)DOOR 2, GARAGE TO HOUSE, SHEET 3, IS REQUIRED TO | | | MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF FBC R13-603.1ABC.1 (INSULATED | | | OR SOLID CORE) AND R309.1 (FIRE RATING REQUIREMENTS). | | | | | | 11.)SHOW SEPARATION BETWEEN GARAGE AND DWELLING AS | | | REQUIRED BY FBC R 309.2. | | | | | | 12.)SHEATHING FASTENING ON SHEET 5 IS IN CONFLICT | | | WITH FBC TABLE 2304.9.1; 4" REQUIRED AT EDGE STRIP (NOT | | | FOR GABLES ONLY). | | | | | | 13.)SHEET 5 INCLUDES A FRAMING DETAIL FOR OPENINGS. | | | AS THIS IS CBS CONSTRUCTION, WHERE IS THIS DETAIL | | | APPLICABLE?PLEASE USE DETAIL REFERENCE MARKERS ON THE | | | FLOOR PLAN. | | | | | | 14.)PLEASE NOTE THAT NO ATTIC STORAGE WILL BE | | | ALLOWED, SHEET 7 OR REVISE BOTTOM CHORD LIVE LOAD, | | | FBC3. | | | | | | 15.)SHEET 7, TRUSS ANCHOR SCHEDULE IS ILLEGIBLE. | | | | | | 16.)SHEET 2, STAIR SECTTION, IS THE NOSING INCLUDED | | | IN THE 10" TREAD, OR IS THIS A 10" TREAD AND AN | | | ADDITIONAL 1" NOSING?FBC R 311. | | | | | | 17.)SHEET 2, NOTE A, REVISE CODE REFERENCE AS FBC1007 | | | TO APPLICABLE RESIDENTIAL CODE SECTION. | | | | | | 18.)PROVIDE A SOILS INVESTIGATION REPORT, TWO | | | ORIGINALS. | | | | | | 19.)PROVIDE COOLING LOAD CALCS FBC 13-607.1.ABC.1. | | | | | | 20.)PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE TO BE REVIEWED BY DESIGNER | | | OF RECORD, FBC*106.3.3. | | | | | | 21.)THE VALUE OF THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN ADJUSTED BASED | | | SQUARE FOOT AREA USING THE ICC BUILDING VALUATION | | | TABLES. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-02-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2007-02-27 |
Time |
08:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2007-02-27 |
Time |
08:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-02-27 08:23:34 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | | | | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | | FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | | RESIDENTIAL | | | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | | EXISTING BUILDING CODE | | | FBC*CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 | | | | | | PLAN CHECK #05041961 | | | | | | COMMENTS FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEWS; | | | NUMBERING TO REMAIN THE SAME FOR | | | CONSISTENCY.NOTE THAT CODE REFERENCE | | | NUMBERS HAVE CHANGED AS THE FIRST REVIEW | | | WAS DONE ON FBC2001, SECOND AND THIRD REVIEWS ON | | | FBC2004. | | | | | | 1.) A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE | | | FILED WITH THE CLERK OF COURTS BEFORE A | | | PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED, FS713.13. | | | | | | 2.) IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM | | | BEACH COUNTY PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE. | | | THE PLANS MUST BE STAMPED AND THE | | | RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE APPLICATION. | | | 561-233-5025 | | | | | | 3.-5.)ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 6.)ENERGY CALCS REQUIRED, FBC11-101.2. | | | SIGN THE OWNER/AGENT LINE OF THE ENERGY | | | CALC, FBC11-103.1.2. | | | | | | 7.-57.)ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 58.)PRODUCT APPROVALS REQUIRED FOR COMPONENTS AND | | | CLADDING.PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE TO BE APPROVED BY | | | DESIGNER OF RECORD, FBC*106.3.3. | | | | | | NEW COMMENT | | | | | | 59.)A4.0 SPECIFIES 16INCH BEAM, A6.0 SPECIFIES 20INCH | | | CONCRETE BEAM.SUBMIT CALCULATIONS, FBC*106.1.2. | | | | | | 60.)INFORMATIONAL ONLY; THE BLOCK WALL WILL REQUIRE A | | | SEPARATE PERMIT. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-11-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2006-11-06 |
Time |
13:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2006-11-06 |
Time |
13:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2006-11-06 13:56:43 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | | | | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | | FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | | RESIDENTIAL | | | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | | EXISTING BUILDING CODE | | | FBC*CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 | | | | | | PLAN CHECK #05041961 | | | | | | COMMENTS FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEWS; | | | NUMBERING TO REMAIN THE SAME FOR | | | CONSISTENCY.NOTE THAT CODE REFERENCE | | | NUMBERS HAVE CHANGED AS THE FIRST REVIEW | | | WAS DONE ON FBC2001, SECOND AND THIRD REVIEWS ON | | | FBC2004. | | | | | | 1.) A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE | | | FILED WITH THE CLERK OF COURTS BEFORE A | | | PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED, FS713.13. | | | | | | 2.) IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM | | | BEACH COUNTY PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE. | | | THE PLANS MUST BE STAMPED AND THE | | | RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE APPLICATION. | | | 561-233-5025 | | | | | | 3.-5.)ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 6.)ENERGY CALCS REQUIRED, FBC11-101.2. | | | SIGN THE OWNER/AGENT LINE OF THE ENERGY | | | CALC, FBC11-103.1.2. | | | | | | 7.)A9.0 IS NOT LEGIBLE. | | | IT ALSO CONTAINS MANY INCORRECT CODE REFERENCES; FOR | | | INSTANCE, BOCA (GOVERNING CODE IS FBC2004) AND | | | ACI530.1-95 (USE CURRENT REFERENCES).CHECK ALL | | | SPECIFICATIONS. | | | | | | 8.-41.)ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 42.)SHOW POSITIVE DRAINAGE FBC R401.3, FBC*109.3.10. | | | THE TYPICAL WALL SECTION ON A8.0 SHOWS A SLOPE AWAY | | | FROM THE BUILDING, BUT AT 5' AWAY FROM THE PROPERTY | | | LINE DOESN'T THIS CAUSE THE WATER TO DUMP ONTO THE | | | ADJACENT PARCEL?PLEASE ADDRESS DRAINAGE ON THE SITE | | | PLAN. | | | | | | 43-55.)ADDRESSED. | | | | | | NEW COMMENT: | | | | | | 56.)DESIGN CRITERIA FOR TRUSSES IS NOT CLEAR.A9.0 | | | STATES 20PSF LIVE, 10PSF DEAD BOTTOM CHORD; A7.0 NOTE | | | STATES "20PSF DEAD LOAD 10PSF". | | | | | | 57.)A9.0 STILL SPECIFIES SHEATHING NAILING OF 6" ON | | | EDGES, 8"IN THE FIELD.FLOOR SHEATHING NAILING IS IN | | | CONFLICT WITH OTHERS SPECIFICATIONS ON THE PLAN.THE | | | SHEET IS DIFFICULT TO READ.MAKE THIS SHEET LEGIBLE IF | | | IT IS REQUIRED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, AND CHECK THAT ALL | | | NOTES ARE CODE COMPLIANT, CURRENT, REFERRING TO CURRENT | | | GOVERNING CODE, AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE CONSISTENT WITH | | | OTHER SPECIFICATIONS ON THE PLAN. | | | | | | 58.)PRODUCT APPROVALS REQUIRED FOR COMPONENTS AND | | | CLADDING.PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE TO BE APPROVED BY | | | DESIGNER OF RECORD, FBC*106.3.3. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-08-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2006-08-08 |
Time |
17:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2006-08-08 |
Time |
12:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2006-08-08 00:00:00 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | | | | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | | FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | | RESIDENTIAL | | | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | | EXISTING BUILDING CODE | | | FBC*CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 | | | | | | PLAN CHECK #05041961 | | | | | | COMMENTS FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEWS; | | | NUMBERING TO REMAIN THE SAME FOR | | | CONSISTENCY.NOTE THAT CODE REFERENCE | | | NUMBERS HAVE CHANGED AS THE FIRST REVIEW | | | WAS DONE ON FBC2001, SECOND REVIEW ON | | | FBC2004. | | | | | | 1.) A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE | | | FILED WITH THE CLERK OF COURTS BEFORE A | | | PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED, FS713.13. | | | | | | 2.) IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM | | | BEACH COUNTY PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE. | | | THE PLANS MUST BE STAMPED AND THE | | | RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE APPLICATION. | | | 561-233-5025 | | | | | | 3.-5.)ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 6.)ENERGY CALCS REQUIRED, FBC11-101.2. | | | SIGN THE OWNER/AGENT LINE OF THE ENERGY | | | CALC, FBC11-103.1.2. | | | | | | THE FRAME WALLS AND THE FLOOR CEILING | | | ASSEMBLY ARE NOT SHOWN.THERE ARE | | | INTERIOR ADJACENT WALLS AND EXTERIOR | | | FRAME WALLS.THE BLOCK WALL ON THE | | | ENERGY CALC SHOWS 0 INSULATION; | | | INSULATION REQUIRED BETWEEN CONDITIONED | | | AND UNCONDITIONED SPACE, AND IN CONFLICT | | | WITH THE PLAN. | | | | | | 7.)A7.0, PROJECT DATA, IS NOT LEGIBLE. | | | DESIGN PRESSURES ARE NOT LEGIBLE. | | | FBC1606.1.7 IS NOT THE CORRECT CODE | | | REFERENCE; PLEASE REMOVE. | | | | | | 8.-19.)ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 20.)WHAT IS THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE | | | CABANA WALLS?IT DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE | | | BLOCK.PROVIDE A DETAIL."STUCCO ON | | | INSULATED WALLS" IS NOT A SUFFICIENT | | | DETAIL. | | | | | | 21.)SEE FBC R302.1,302.2, BAY WINDOW | | | MUST BE OVER 3' FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. | | | NOTE THAT THE ARCHITECT'S SITE PLAN | | | SHOWS THE BAY WINDOW 3' FROM THE | | | PROPERTY LINE.NO OPENINGS ALLOWED 3' | | | FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.THIS IS IN | | | CONFLICT WITH THE SURVEY WHICH SHOWS | | | 3.5' FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.3.5' IS | | | ACCEPTABLE. | | | | | | 22-26.)ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 27.)REGARDING THE WALL BETWEEN THE | | | GARAGE AND LAUNDRY AREA, FROM PREVIOUS | | | CORRECTION LIST: THE FRAME WALL SHOWS | | | "SOUND INSULATION", MUST HAVE R VALUE | | | SPECIFIED FBC13-602. | | | | | | 28.-41.)ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 42.)SHOW POSITIVE DRAINAGE FBC R401.3, | | | FBC*109.3.10. | | | | | | 43-46.)ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 46.)THE GARAGE BEAM DETAIL SHOWS EMPTY | | | SPACE ABOVE THE BEAM.HOW WILL THIS BE | | | STRUCTURALLY CONTINUOUS? | | | | | | 47.)PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE EXTERIOR | | | FRAME WALL. | | | | | | NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | NEW COMMENTS, 3RD REVIEW: | | | | | | 48.)A7.0 REFERS TO ASCE7-98, CORRECT | | | REFERENCE IS ASCE7-02, FBC35. | | | | | | 49-53.) ADDRESSED. | | | | | | NEW COMMENT: | | | | | | 54.)R403.1.4, EXTERIOR FOOTINGS TO BE | | | 12" BELOW GRADE. | | | | | | 55.)TWO COPIES OF ALL DOCUMENTS | | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-09-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-09-20 |
Time |
10:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-09-20 |
Time |
09:04 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-09-20 10:30:08 | | | | ** DENIED 4TH TIME ** | | | | | | THIS IS THE FIRST REVIEW UNDER NEW PLANS FROM A NEW | | | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL(S). | | | | | | ** PLEASE SEE THERE ARE NEW NOTES BASED ON THE PLANS | | | BEING SUBMITTED FOR THE FIRST TIME. THESE PLANS WERE | | | NOT PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW. | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW THIS PROJECT WAS APPLIED FOR | | | PERMIT UNDER THE PREVIOUS ADOPTED CODE CYCLE IN THE | | | FLORIDA STATUTES 553.73. | | | PLEASE SEE THIS IS UNDER THE 2002 NFPA-70 AS THIS WAS | | | APPLIED FOR PERMIT BEFORE DECCEMBER 8TH, 2006. PLEASE | | | ADJUST PLANS. | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR LAYOUT OF | | | DWELLING DOES NOT CONTAIN ANY DESIGN PROFESSIONAL FOR | | | TAKING RESPONSIBILITY OF PLANS. | | | PLEASE SEE THE SHEET WHICH CONTAINS THE ELECTRICAL | | | PANEL SCHEDULE AND RISER CONTAINS AN ENGINEER SIGNED, | | | DATED AND SEALED ALONG WITH TITLE BLOCKS. | | | ** PLEASE KNOW A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL MUST TAKE | | | RESPONSIBILITY OF SAID PLANS. FS 471, 481, 489, ETC FBC | | | ADMIN SECTION, 106.1.2, 106.3.1, 110.1.2 ETC. | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SHOW DISCONNECTS FOR THE CONDENSING | | | UNITS PER 440.11, 110.26. | | | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE A/C SYSTEMS WHICH ARE SHOWN ON | | | PLANS DO NOT CORRELATE WITH THE LOAD CALCULATIONS, OVER | | | CURRENT PROTECTION AND LOCATIONS. | | | PLEASE SEE THE MISSING AIR HANDLER UNIT FOR 2ND FLOOR | | | W/ DISCONNECT. 440.11, 110.26 | | | PLEASE SEE THE LOADS SHOWN ON CALCULATIONS EXCEED THAT | | | OF THE RATING OF THE BRANCH CIRCUITS FEEDING EACH OF | | | THESE SYSTEMS. PLEASE SEE 220.19, 240.4, 310.16, | | | 424.3B | | | PLEASE SEE THE OVER CURRENT PROTECTION IS TO MEET THE | | | MINIMUM FOR HEAT LOADS PER 424.3B (125% WHICH IS FOR | | | OVER CURRENT PROTECTION). | | | PLEASE ADJUST THE OCP, CONDUCTOR SIZES, LOCATIONS AND | | | LOADS AS NEEDED. | | | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE LOAD, OVER CURRENT PROTECTION | | | AND SIZE OF FEEDERS TO PANEL *B* DO NOT MEET THE | | | REQUIREMENTS FOR THE LOADS. | | | PLEASE ADJUST. | | | 240.4, 310.16, 408.4 | | | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SHOW THE LOCATION OF PANEL *B*. 110.26, | | | 408.7, 240.24D | | | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE CORRELATE CIRCUITING ON PLANS. PLEASE | | | SEE THERE ARE SEVERAL CIRCUITS ON PANEL SCHEDULE(S) | | | WHICH ARE NOT THE SAME AS ON PLANS. | | | PLEASE SEE FOR EXAMPLE: | | | B-7 ON PLANS IS FOR REFRIGERATOR, YET THE PANEL | | | SCHEDULE SHOWS THIS AS THE DISHWASHER. | | | B-9 NOT ON PANEL SCHEDULE YET SHOWN AS DISHWASHER ON | | | PLANS. | | | PLEASE SEE THERE ARE SOME OTHERS PLEASE BE SURE TO | | | VERIFY ALL. | | | | | | 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MISSING DISPOSAL ON PLANS. PLEASE | | | BE SURE TO SEE 210.4B FOR REQUIRED 2-POLE BREAKER IF | | | THE DISHWASHER AND DISPOSAL IS ON THE SAME YOKE. | | | 408.4. | | | FBC 106.3.5.4 | | | | | | 9) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 210.52B1, 210.11C1, 220.16 FOR | | | REQUIRED CIRCUITING FOR DINING ROOM/AREA RECEPTACLE | | | CIRCUITS. PLEASE SEE THE AREAS AS SPECIFIED IN 210.52B1 | | | ARE TO BE ON ONE OR MORE OF THE SMALL APPLIANCE | | | CIRCUITS. PLEASE ALSO SEE THAT THE LOAD SHALL BE | | | FIGURED ON EACH OF THOSE CIRCUITS AT A MINIMUM OF | | | 1500VA FOR EACH. THIS INCLUDES ANY ABOVE THE MINIMUM | | | FOR THE KITCHEN SMALL APPLIANCE CIRCUITS. | | | PLEASE SEE AS NOTED IN SECTIONS, THESE MUST BE 20AMP | | | AND #12 AWG. | | | PLEASE ADJUST PLANS FOR THESE. (EXAMPLE CIRCUIT #33). | | | | | | 10) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THERE ARE SEVERAL BATHROOM | | | CIRCUITS WHICH DO NOT MEET 210.52D, 210.11C3. PLEASE | | | SEE ONE CIRCUIT WHICH IS #22 MENTIONS THIS IS ALSO TO | | | FEED HALL, WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED. | | | PLEASE SEE THESE ARE SHOWN WITH THE REQUIRED #12 | | | HOWEVER NOT THE REQUIRED 20AMP BREAKER. | | | PLEASE ADJUST ALL ON PLANS/PANEL SCHEDULES AS NEEDED. | | | (19,22,37,38,39 ETC) | | | | | | 11) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 210.12 FOR SMOKE ALARM CIRCUIT | | | WHICH IS NOT SHOWN AS ARC FAULT PROTECTED AS REQUIRED. | | | ALL OUTLETS ARE TO BE AFCI. PLEASE ADJUST AND LIST ON | | | PANEL SCHEDULE. | | | | | | 12) NOTE: PLEASE INDICATE THE AIC RATING FOR | | | MAINS/PANELS/BREAKERS PER 110.9. | | | FBC 106.1.2, 106.1.3, 106.3.5.4 | | | | | | 13) NOTE: PLEASE CLARIFY *UTILITY ROOM* CIRCUITS WHICH | | | ARE SHOWN AS #12, 15AMP, AND GFI? | | | THESE CIRCUITS 17 AND 23 ARE FEEDING OTHER AREAS ALSO. | | | | | | 14) NOTE: PLEASE SEE WATER HEATER IS BEING SHOWN ON | | | CIRCUITS 5/9 ON PLAN WHICH IS NOT POSSIBLE FOR | | | 220/240V. PLEASE SEE THE PANEL SCHEDULE AS THIS CALLS | | | FOR 5/7. | | | PLEASE ALSO SEE THE SYMBOL SHOWN FOR CONNECTION OF THE | | | WATER HEATER LENDS THIS AS BEING PLUG IN CONNECTION. | | | PLEASE SEE 422.30, 422.31 AS THIS UNIT IS REQUIRED TO | | | BE HARDWIRED AND MAY NOT PLUG-IN. | | | A DISCONNECT IS NOT REQUIRED WHEN THE PANEL IS WITHIN | | | SIGHT, HOWEVER MAY BE INSTALLED. | | | | | | 15) NOTE: PLEASE VERIFY IF THE CONDUIT FROM THE METER | | | TO THE PANEL INSIDE IS UNDERGROUND/SLAB OR NOT. PLEASE | | | SEE 230.70,230.71, AS A MAIN DISCONNECT WITH OVER | | | CURRENT PROTECTION WOULD BE REQUIRED OUTSIDE IF MORE | | | THAN 8FT OF UNPROTECTED CONDUCTORS ARE INSIDE THE | | | DWELLING. | | | | | | 16) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSE ONLY: | | | THE LOW VOLTAGE AS SHOWN ON PLANS WILL BE REQUIRED TO | | | BE UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT. | | | PLEASE KNOW THESE PLANS MAY BE USED FOR REFERENCING AND | | | A *TURN AROUND* PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED. | | | ** THIS IS ONLY NOTED FOR INFORMATION TO THE OWNER. | | | | | | 17) NOTE: | | | | | | | | | *** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS | | | OR COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. | | | IF THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY | | | WAY, NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, | | | PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND | | | THIS REVIEWER. | | | | | | ** IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE | | | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE | | | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED | | | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW | | | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED | | | FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND | | | AVOID ANY DELAYS. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | 2007-09-20 09:04:36 | NEW PLANS SUBMITTED ON 9/13/07 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
2007-09-20 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-08-21 |
Time |
13:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2007-08-21 13:39:29 | 8/21/07 PLANS ARE ON HOLD, OWED FEES FOR PREVIOUS | | | REVIEWS. PLANS SUBMITTED ARE THAT DONE BY THE | | | ARCHITECT. PLANS SUBMITTED AND PREVIOUSLY RETAINED | | | PLANS MAY BE TURNED OVER TO THE STATE BOARD OF | | | ARCHITECTS AND STATE'S LEGAL COUNSEL TO THE BOARD. DV | | | PALMER. | | | | | | | | | THIS IS BEING TURNED OVER TO TEH BUILDING OFFICIAL AND | | | NO FURTHER REVIEWS WILL BE DONE AT THIS TIME. DV | | | PALMER. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-01-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-01-21 |
Time |
09:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-01-19 |
Time |
20:50 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-01-21 09:50:02 | **** UNSAT **** | | | 3RD REVIEW UNDER PERMIT # 06071334 | | | 6TH REVIEW FOR THIS SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE.(PREVIOUS# | | | WAS 05041961 | | | | | | ** PLEASE SEE COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW STILL NEED | | | TO BE ADDRESSED. | | | | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE NEC 2002. 220, 220.31, 220.16, | | | 220.14, 220.17, 210.52B1, 210.11C1, 210.11C2,ETCFOR | | | LOAD CALCULATIONS, MINIMUM CIRCUITS, AND LOADS FOR EACH | | | OF THOSE MINIMUM CIRCUITS. | | | PLEASE SEE THE PREVIOUS COMMENTS FROM ALL OF THE | | | PREVIOUS REVIEWS STATED THAT THE LOADS SHOWN ON THE | | | PANEL SCHEDULE DID NOT CORRELATE WITH THE LOADS IN THE | | | LOAD CALCULATIONS. | | | PLEASE SEE AMPERAGES SHOWN ON THE PANEL SCHEDULE DO NOT | | | CORRELATE WITH THE KVA/WATTAGE LOAD ON THE LOAD | | | CALCULATIONS. | | | PLEASE SEE LOADS OF 6AMPS IS BEING SHOWN FOR | | | WASHER/LAUNDRY CIRCUIT, HOWEVER THIS DOES NOT CORRELATE | | | WITH THE KVA ON CALCULATIONS | | | PLEASE SEE THE DISHWASHER/DISPOSAL IS STILL BEING SHOWN | | | ON THE SAME CIRCUIT AND IS SHOWN ON WITH THE DINING | | | ROOM CIRCUIT. THE LOADS ON THE DISHWASHER AND DISPOSAL | | | ARE MOST LIKELY DEDICATED CIRCUITS. THIS OFFICE HAS | | | NEVER SEEN A DISHWASHER ON WITH THE DISPOSAL AND ALL | | | THE OTHER RECEPTACLES AS SHOWN. PLEASE SEE THE DISPOSAL | | | IS STILL ONLY BEING SHOWN HARDWIRED. IF THIS IS FED | | | FROM THE SAME RECEPTACLE OUTLET AS THE DISHWASHER | | | (SPLIT OUTLET) PLEASE SEE 210.4B | | | PLEASE SEE MICROWAVE. | | | PLEASE SEE MISSING SMALL APPLIANCE CIRCUIT DESIGNATIONS | | | ON PANEL SCHEDULE. ONE CIRCUIT SEEMS TO BE SHOWN AS 2ND | | | FLR GFI, INSTEAD OF SM APPL. PLEASE SEE THE OTHER | | | CIRCUIT SHOWN IN THE KITCHEN IS SHOWN FEEDING THE | | | REFRIGERATOR ONLY. PLANS SHOW ONE CIRCUIT FEEDING ALL | | | COUNTER SPACE RECEPTS IN THE KITCHEN. | | | PLEASE SEE THE LOAD FOR THE POOL PANEL IS BEING SHOWN | | | AS 30AMPS, YET THE LOAD CALCULATIONS ONLY INDICATE | | | 2.2KW?? | | | PLEASE SEE GARAGE DOOR OPENER WHICH IS STILL BEING | | | SHOWN ON WITH ALL OTHER RECEPTS IN THE GARAGE. PLEASE | | | SEE MOTOR LOADS AS STATED ABOVE 220.14, 430.148. | | | PLEASE SEE AS STATED IN THE PREVIOUS REVIEWS; PLEASE | | | CORRELATE ALL OF THE LOADS ON PANEL SCHEDULE WITH THE | | | LOADS BEING SHOWN IN THE LOAD CALCULATIONS. | | | THE ABOVE ITEMS ARE NOT ALL POSSIBLE ITEMS AS THE NOTES | | | MENTIONS; CODE COMPLIANCE FOR ALL SHALL BE MET. | | | THE COMMENT RESPONSE FROM THE ARCHITECT MENTIONS ALL OF | | | THESE WOULD BE ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MISSING RECEPTACLE IN GUEST ROOM, | | | THIS WAS ON PREVIOUS PLANS, HOWEVER IS NOW REMOVED. IF | | | PLANS WERE OK WITH LOAD CALCULATIONS, THIS WOULD HAVE | | | BEEN REDLINED. 210.52 2FT OF WALL SPACE. | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE AHU'S IN THE FIRST FLOOR CLOSET | | | AND 2ND FLOOR ATTIC ARE STILL BEING SHOWN WITH 220V | | | RECEPTACLES? THIS WAS GONE OVER ON THE MEETING WITH THE | | | ARCHITECT AND THE DESIGNER. THE RECEPTACLE WAS GOING TO | | | BE REMOVED, HOWEVER STILL SHOWN ON PLANS. PLEASE SEE | | | THIS WOULD HAVE BEEN REDLINED, HOWEVER SEE NOTE #1. | | | THE AHU'S ARE TO BE HARDWIRED TO DISCONNECTS, THESE ARE | | | NOT TO BE CORD AND PLUG CONNECTED. THE SIGNED AND | | | SEALED COMMENT RESPONSE FROM THE ARCHITECT MENTIONS | | | WOULD BE ADDRESSED AND CORRECTED. | | | 4220.30, 422.30, 440.11. | | | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEWS REQUESTED ALL | | | CIRCUITING ON PLANS TO CORRELATE WITH PANEL SCHEDULE. | | | PLEASE SEE DRYER IS STILL BEING SHOWN WITH A RECEPTACLE | | | WHICH FEEDS THE GUEST ROOM? | | | (CIRCUIT #20). | | | 408.4, 310.16, 240.4, | | | FBC 106.1.2, 106.3.5.4 ADMIN SECTION. | | | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE RISER SHOWS POOL SUB PANEL BEING | | | 30AMP, YET THIS IS BEING FED FROM A 40AMP BREAKER ON | | | THE MAIN PANEL. PLEASE CORRELATE THE LOADS (AS NOTED | | | ABOVE IN NOTE #1), PLEASE CORRELATE THE SIZE OF THE | | | PANEL AND ANY OTHER ASPECTS TO THIS. | | | RESPONSE MENTIONS THIS WOULD BE CORRECTED AS THIS | | | COMMENT WAS IN PREVIOUS REVIEWS;, HOWEVER PLEASE SEE | | | THIS IS STILL IN NEED OF COORDINATION. | | | 310.16, 240.4, 220, ETC. | | | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE AS GIVEN NOTICE IN THE PREVIOUS | | | REVIEWS, A 4X FEE HAS NOW BEEN ASSESSED TO THE DESIGN | | | PROFESSIONAL FOR REPEAT CODE COMPLIANCE COMMENTS PER | | | 553.80(2)(B). | | | PLEASE SEE THE FEE OF $2820.00 HAS NOW BEEN ASSESSED TO | | | THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AND IS NOT THE RESPONSIBILITY | | | OF THE CONTRACTOR OR THE OWNER OF PROPERTY. | | | ONE COPY OF THE ELECTRICAL PLANS IS BEING RETAINED AND | | | WILL BE PLACED WITH THE OTHER PREVIOUS FIVE SETS OF | | | PLANS PREVIOUSLY RETAINED IN FILE. THESE PLANS WILL BE | | | FORWARDED TO THE STATE BOARD OF ARCHITECT'S LEGAL | | | COUNSEL ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE COMPLETED. | | | | | | | | | * ** IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE | | | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE | | | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED | | | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW | | | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED | | | FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND | | | AVOID ANY DELAYS. | | | | | | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF | | | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, | | | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO | | | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS | | | REVIEWER. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | 2007-01-19 20:51:07 | 2007-01-19 20:51:07 | | | IN ELEC FOR REVIEW |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-10-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2006-10-27 |
Time |
13:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2006-10-27 |
Time |
10:46 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-10-27 13:07:24 | ********** UNSAT 2ND REVIEW UNDER 06071334 | | | *************** | | | 5TH REVIEW FOR PROJECT** | | | | | | 1) NOTE:PLEASE SEE THAT THIS ISNOW THE | | | 5TH REVIEW FOR THIS PROJECT. PLANS | | | ORIGINALLY CAME IN UNDER A "PLAN REVIEW" | | | FOR THREE REVIEWS UNDER #05041961 AND | | | NOW ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | PLEASE SEE MANY OF THE FOLLOWING | | | COMMENTS ARE FROM ALL PREVIOUS | | | ELECTRICAL REVIEWS. | | | ** PLEASE KNOW ONCE AGAIN PLANS ARE BEING RETAINED. | | | PLEASE SEE OTHER | | | POSSIBLE COMMENTS FROM OTHER TRADES. | | | PLANS WILL BE REVIEWED BY THE SAME | | | REVIEWERS AS PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED. | | | PLEASE BE AWARE THAT ONE COMPLETE SET OF | | | PLANS ARE BEING RETAINED AND WILL BE ALL | | | SETS OF PLANS PREVIOUSLY RETAINED. ONCE | | | ALL REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE PLANS WILL BE | | | FORWARDED TO THE STATE BOARD OF | | | ARCHITECT'S AND STATE'S LEGAL COUNSEL TO | | | THE BOARD. THESE PLANS WILL NOW HAVE | | | BEEN REVIEWED FOUR TIMES FOR A SINGLE | | | FAMILY HOUSE WITH MOST OF THE SAME | | | COMMENTS FOR ELECTRICAL NOT ADDRESSED. | | | PLEASE SEE FS 553.80(2)(B). | | | PLEASE KNOW, IF PLANS COME BACK WITH ANY OF THE SAME | | | COMMENTS FOE CODE COMPLIANCE NOT ADDRESSED, A 4X FEE | | | WILL BE ASSESSED. | | | PLEASE SEE | | | FS 481.221(4) | | | | | | 2) NOTE: OK. | | | | | | 3) NOTE:NO, SOME CIRCUITS SHOWN BLANK ON SCHEDULE FOR | | | CONDUCTOR AND BREAKER SIZES FOR THIS? | | | PLEASE ALSO SEE PREVIOUS NOTES WHICH MENTIONS THE BATH | | | CIRCUIT WITH THE GFI RECEPT MAY NOT BE PART OF ANY | | | OTHER DEVICES/OUTLETS OUTSIDE THE BATH ROOM. | | | | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** | | | PLEASE SEE 210.52D, 210.11C3 | | | FOR CIRCUITING OF BATH(S). PLEASE SEE | | | MULTIPLE BATHS MAY NOT BE FED FROM THE | | | SAME CIRCUIT WHEN FEEDING BATH LTS AND | | | RECEPTS. | | | PLEASE ALSO SEE THE REQUIRED DEDICATED | | | BATH CIRCUIT(S) ARE ALSO SHOWN FEEDING | | | OTHER AREAS? (HALL, CLOSETS ETC). | | | PLEASE SEE PLANS SHOW THIS IS VIOLATION | | | OF CODES ABOVE. | | | | | | 4) NOTE: NO, SAME NOTE> | | | | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** | | | PLEASE CORRELATE RISER AND | | | PANEL SCHEDULE FOR FUTURE POOL PANEL. | | | TWO SETS OF FEEDER SIZE ARE SHOWN?? | | | #8'S ? #6'S? | | | 215.5, FBC106.1.2 | | | | | | 5) NOTE: OK. | | | | | | 6) NOTE: OK. | | | | | | 7) NOTE:NO, SAME NOTE > | | | | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** | | | PLEASE SEE MIN DISCONNECT | | | CLEARANCES PER 110.26 FOR A/C CU. | | | | | | 8) NOTE:NO/OK, PLEASE SEE ACCESS SEEMS TO BE | | | ADDRESSED, HOWEVER PLEASE SEE THAT THE UNITS ARE NOW | | | BEING SHOWN AND NOTED HAVING RECEPTS FOR UNIT??? PLEASE | | | SEE 440.11,110.26 AS DISCONNECTS ARE REQUIRED. | | | | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** | | | PLEASE SEE MECHANICAL COMMENTS | | | AS AHU SHOWN IN ATTIC IS MORE THAN 6' | | | AWAY FROM WHAT IS SHOWN AS THE ATTIC | | | ACCESS ON PLANS. | | | PLEASE ALSO SEE MISSING LT AND RECPT.210.70,210.63 | | | | | | 9) NOTE: OK. | | | | | | 10) NOTE: OK. | | | | | | 11) NOTE: NO, LOAD CALCULATIONS DO NOT MEET CODE. | | | PLEASE SEE NEC 220.31 , 220. | | | CAN NOT TAKE DE-RATINGS FOR SMALL APPLIANCE CIRCUITS. | | | PLEASE SEE NOW WASHER/LAUNDRY CIRCUIT IS BEING SHOWN AS | | | 1200 VA. PLEASE SEE 220.16, 210.11C2 FOR MIN VA. | | | | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** | | | PLEASE SEE THE NEC FOR LOAD CALCULATIONS. IT IS NOT | | | CLEAR WHERE AND | | | HOW THESE FIGURES ARE DERIVED AS THE | | | DERATING SHOWN DO NOT APPEAR IN THE | | | CODE. PLEASE SEE DIFFERENT PERCENTAGES | | | ARE BEING SHOWN WHICH ARE NOT PERMITTED. | | | PLEASE SEE 220. | | | PLEASE ALSO SEE MANY LOADS (AMERAGES) | | | SHOWN ON PANEL SCHEDULE DO NOT CORRELATE | | | WITH THE KW RATINGS SHOWN ON LOAD | | | CALCULATIONS. | | | PLEASE SEE A/C#1, A/C #2, DRYER, RANGE | | | ETC, HOW AND WHERE DO THESE AMPERAGE'S | | | COME FROM. PLEASE SEE THE KW RATING IS | | | DIVIDED BY THE VOLTAGE TO ARRIVE AT THE | | | AMPERAGE AND THE FIGURES SHOWN JUST | | | DON'T ADD UP.???? | | | PLEASE SEE OTHER LOADS WHERE LOADS ARE | | | TAKEN AT 40%?? PLEASE INDICATE HOW AND | | | WHERE IN THE NEC PERMITS THESE AT 40%?? | | | PLEASE SEE NEC 2002 ART 220. | | | PLEASE ALSO CLARIFY HOW THE LOADS SHOWN | | | OFGENERAL LIGHTING AND RECEPT LOADS | | | ARE DERIVED. AN AMPERAGE LOAD IS SHOWN | | | FOR EACH OF THESE?? | | | | | | 12) NOTE: OK. | | | | | | 13) NOTE:NO, DISC SHOWN, HOWEVER DO NOT MEET 110.26. | | | | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** | | | PLEASE SHOW REQUIRED | | | DISCONNECTS FOR CU'S 440.11 AND PLEASE | | | SEE 110.26 FIR MIN CLEARANCE. | | | | | | 14) NOTE: OK. | | | | | | 15) NOTE:OK. | | | | | | *** NEW NOTE ** | | | | | | 16) NOTE: PLEASE SEE COPY OF FS 553.80(2)(B) ATTACHED. | | | | | | 17) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW, IN NO CASE CAN WHITE OUT OR HAND | | | WRITTEN CHANGES BE PLACED ON PLANS SIGNED , DATED AND | | | SEALED BY A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. | | | FS 481/471 | | | | | | * ** IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE | | | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE | | | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED | | | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW | | | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED | | | FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND | | | AVOID ANY DELAYS. | | | | | | PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMATION FOR | | | REVIEW. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS, | | | PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CALL. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-07-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2006-07-25 |
Time |
08:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2006-07-25 |
Time |
07:03 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-07-25 00:00:00 | ********** UNSAT *************** | | | | | | 1) NOTE:PLEASE SEE THEAT THIS IS THE | | | 4TH REVIEW FOR THIS PROJECT. PLANS | | | ORIGINALLY CAME IN UNDER A "PLAN REVIEW" | | | FOR THREE REVIEWS UNDER #05041961 AND | | | NOW ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | PLEASE SEE MANY OF THE FOLLOWING | | | COMMENTS ARE FROM ALL PREVIOUS | | | ELECTRICAL REVIEWS. PLEASE SEE OTHER | | | POSSIBLE COMMENTS FROM OTHER TRADES. | | | PLANS WILL BE REVIEWED BY THE SAME | | | REVIEWERS AS PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED. | | | ************************************* | | | PLEASE BE AWARE THAT ONE COMPLETE SET OF | | | PLANS ARE BEING RETAINED AND WILL BE ALL | | | SETS OF PLANS PREVIOUSLY RETAINED. ONCE | | | ALL REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE PLANS WILL BE | | | FORWARDED TO THE STATE BOARD OF | | | ARCHITECT'S AND STATE'S LEGAL COUNSEL TO | | | THE BOARD. THESE PLANS WILL NOW HAVE | | | BEEN REVIEWED FOUR TIMES FOR A SINGLE | | | FAMILY HOUSE WITH MOST OF THE SAME | | | COMMENTS FOR ELECTRICAL NOT ADDRESSED. | | | PLEASE SEE FS 553.80(2)(B). | | | PLEASE SEE I AM ATTACHING ALL REVIEWS | | | FOR ALL TRADES DONE UNDER 05041961 AND | | | NEW COMMENTS UNDER 06071334. | | | FS 481.221(4) | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT AIC RATINGS FOR | | | ALL NEW SERVICE EQUIPMENT BEING INSTALL- | | | ED. MAINS/BRKRS AND PANELS ARE ALL TO BE | | | RATED FOR THE AVAILABLE FAULT CURRENT. | | | PER 110.9/215.5 | | | THIS WAS REQUESTED ON ALL PREVIOUS | | | REVIEWS. | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 210.52D, 210.11C3 | | | FOR CIRCUITING OF BATH(S). PLEASE SEE | | | MULTIPLE BATHS MAY NOT BE FED FROM THE | | | SAME CIRCUIT WHEN FEEDING BATH LTS AND | | | RECEPTS. | | | PLEASE ALSO SEE THE REQUIRED DEDICATED | | | BATH CIRCUIT(S) ARE ALSO SHOWN FEEDING | | | OTHER AREAS? (HALL, CLOSETS ETC). | | | PLEASE SEE PLANS SHOW THIS IS VIOLATION | | | OF CODES ABOVE. | | | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE CORRELATE RISER AND | | | PANEL SCHEDULE FOR FUTURE POOL PANEL. | | | TWO SETS OF FEEDER SIZE ARE SHOWN?? | | | #8'S ? #6'S? | | | 215.5, FBC106.1.2 | | | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MISSING EQUIPMENT | | | GROUNDING CONDUCTOR FROM MAIN DISCONNECT | | | TO PANEL "A". 250.24B, 250.110,250.122 | | | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MISSING REQUIRED | | | FOOTER STEEL AS PART OF THE GROUNDING | | | ELECTRODE SYSTEM. 250.50 | | | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MIN DISCONNECT | | | CLEARANCES PER 110.26 FOR A/C CU. | | | | | | 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MECHANICAL COMMENTS | | | AS AHU SHOWN IN ATTIC IS MORE THAN 6' | | | AWAY FROM WHAT IS SHOWN AS THE ATTIC | | | ACCESS ON PLANS. | | | PLEASE ALSO SEE MISSING LT AND RECPT.210.70,210.63 | | | | | | 9) NOTE: PLEASE THAT THE FOLLOWING | | | MINIMUM CODES ARE REFERENCED ON THE | | | PLANS. | | | 2002 NFPA-70 (NEC), 2002 NFPA-72 . | | | | | | 10) NOTE: PLEASE SEE SD'S ARE STILL | | | BEING SHOWN ON MULTIPLE CIRCUITS???? | | | PLEASE KNOW, SD'S ARE REQUIRED TO BE | | | 120V W/ BATTERY BACK AND WIRED "INLINE" | | | WITH EACH OTHER. PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW THIS | | | IS POSSIBLE AS SHOWN WITH SD'S BEING | | | SHOWN ON AT LEAST FOUR DIFFERENT | | | CIRCUITS?? | | | 11.5.1.1, 11.8.3 NFPA-72 | | | | | | 11) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE NEC FOR LOAD CALCULATIONS. IT | | | IS NOT CLEAR WHERE AND | | | HOW THESE FIGURES ARE DERIVED AS THE | | | DERATING SHOWN DO NOT APPEAR IN THE | | | CODE. PLEASE SEE DIFFERENT PERCENTAGES | | | ARE BEING SHOWN WHICH ARE NOT PERMITTED. | | | PLEASE SEE 220. | | | PLEASE ALSO SEE MANY LOADS (AMERAGES) | | | SHOWN ON PANEL SCHEDULE DO NOT CORRELATE | | | WITH THE KW RATINGS SHOWN ON LOAD | | | CALCULATIONS. | | | PLEASE SEE A/C#1, A/C #2, DRYER, RANGE | | | ETC, HOW AND WHERE DO THESE AMPERAGE'S | | | COME FROM. PLEASE SEE THE KW RATING IS | | | DIVIDED BY THE VOLTAGE TO ARRIVE AT THE | | | AMPERAGE AND THE FIGURES SHOWN JUST | | | DON'T ADD UP.???? | | | PLEASE SEE OTHER LOADS WHERE LOADS ARE | | | TAKEN AT 40%?? PLEASE INDICATE HOW AND | | | WHERE IN THE NEC PERMITS THESE AT 40%?? | | | PLEASE SEE NEC 2002 ART 220. | | | PLEASE ALSO CLARIFY HOW THE LOADS SHOWN | | | OFGENERAL LIGHTING AND RECEPT LOADS | | | ARE DERIVED. AN AMPERAGE LOAD IS SHOWN | | | FOR EACH OF THESE?? | | | | | | 12) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MISSING RECEPT PER | | | 210.52 IN UTILITY AREA. | | | | | | 13) NOTE: PLEASE SHOW REQUIRED | | | DISCONNECTS FOR CU'S 440.11 AND PLEASE | | | SEE 110.26 FIR MIN CLEARANCE. | | | | | | 14) NOTE: PLEASE SEE RECEPT SHOWN FOR | | | WATER HEATER, HOWEVER THIS IS REQUIRED | | | TO BE HARDWIRED W/ DISCONNECT. | | | 422.30,422.31. | | | | | | 15) NOTE: PLEASE VERIFY THE OCP SHOWN | | | FOR DRYER. THIS IS A 5KW UNIT AND SHOWS | | | 40A OCP?. | | | | | | | | | | | | PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMATION FOR | | | REVIEW. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS, | | | PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CALL. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-09-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-09-14 |
Time |
08:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-09-14 |
Time |
08:24 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-09-14 08:24:50 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-08-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2007-08-17 |
Time |
16:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2007-08-17 |
Time |
16:16 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-08-17 16:16:55 | TO CHOOPS | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-01-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-01-19 |
Time |
08:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-01-19 |
Time |
08:34 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-01-19 08:34:55 | TO "DPALMER" DESK/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-01-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2007-01-18 |
Time |
18:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-01-12 |
Time |
09:00 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-01-12 09:01:03 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-10-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-10-20 |
Time |
09:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-10-20 |
Time |
09:57 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-10-20 09:58:18 | TO "DPALMER" DESK/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-10-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-10-11 |
Time |
13:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-10-11 |
Time |
13:32 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-10-11 13:33:17 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-08-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2006-08-08 |
Time |
17:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2006-07-24 |
Time |
10:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2006-07-24 00:00:00 | TO "SFR" "Z" |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-09-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-09-20 |
Time |
11:48 |
Rev Time |
0.35 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-09-20 |
Time |
11:48 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-09-20 12:02:33 | PLAN REVIEW UNDER THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE & | | | REFERENCED CODES WITH 05, 06 REVISIONS, CITY OF WEST | | | PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 1 (W.P.B.), FLORIDA | | | ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (F.A.C.), AND FLORIDA STATUTES | | | (F.S.). | | | | | | ** PLANS UNDER NEW DESGIN PROFESSIONAL ** | | | | | | *** DENIED *** | | | 1) SUBMIT COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS, SEE FBC | | | 13-607.1.ABC.1. | | | | | | 2) MECHANICAL (A/C) PLANS HAVE NOT BEEN SUBMITTED FOR | | | REVIEW. SUBMIT MECHANICAL (A/C) PLANS FOR REVIEW, SEE | | | WPB AMEND. 106.3.5.4 (10). | | | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729 | | | E-MAIL; [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-01-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-01-22 |
Time |
09:36 |
Rev Time |
0.30 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-01-22 |
Time |
09:36 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-01-22 09:39:10 | *** DENIED *** | | | 1) AS REQUESTED IN LAST REVIEW 10-30-06. PLEASE SUBMIT | | | ENERGY CALCULATIONS PER FBC 13-101.2.1 . | | | | | | 2) AS REQUESTED IN LAST REVIEW 10-30-06. PLEASE SUBMIT | | | MANUAL J CALCULATIONS, PER 2004 FBC 13-607.1.ABC.1 . | | | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-10-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2006-10-30 |
Time |
08:28 |
Rev Time |
0.30 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2006-10-30 |
Time |
08:28 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-10-30 08:36:33 | *** DENIED *** | | | 1) PLEASE SUBMIT ENERGY CALCULATIONS PER FBC 13-101.2.1 | | | . | | | | | | 2) PLEASE SUBMITMANUAL J CALCULATIONS, PER 2004 FBC | | | 13-607.1.ABC.1 . | | | | | | 3) BOTH CALCULATIONS WERE SUBMITTED FOR LAST REVIEW, | | | BUT HAVE NOT BEEN FOR THIS REVIEW. | | | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-07-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2006-07-27 |
Time |
16:26 |
Rev Time |
0.30 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2006-07-27 |
Time |
16:26 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-07-27 00:00:00 | *** DENIED *** | | | 1) RETURN AIR DUCTS TO FIRST FLOOR ROOMS | | | OFFICE, STAIR HALL, GUEST ROOM, AND | | | IN-LAW BEDROOM ARE NOT SIZED OR SIZED TO | | | SMALL, SEE NOTE #6. | | | | | | 2) PLEASE SHOW OR EXPLAIN HOW RETURN AIR | | | DUCTS ARE TO TIE INTO THE OPEN RETURN IN | | | THE A/C CLOSET ( LOUV. DOOR R/A AND | | | DUCTED RETURN AIR). | | | | | | 3) CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS (PLANS) SHALL | | | BE OF SUFFICIENT CLARITY. PER 2004 FBC | | | 106.1.1 . | | | | | | 4) ATTIC ACCESS NEEDS TO BE WITHIN 6 | | | FEET OF AHU #2, PER 2004 FBC/R | | | M1305.1.3.2 . | | | | | | 5) MECHANICAL PLANS ARE CALLING FOR UNIT | | | #123,520 SENSIBLE BTU'S AND UNIT #2 | | | 42,350 SENSIBLE BTU'S, MANUAL 'J' | | | CALCULATIONS ARE CALLING FOR UNIT #1 | | | 14,972 BTU'S AND UNIT #224,469 | | | SENSIBLE BTU'S, THE PLANS CAN ONLY CALL | | | FOR 20% MORE THAN THE MANUAL | | | 'J'CALCULATIONS, PER 2004 FBC | | | 607.1.ABC.1.1, COOLING EQUIPMENT IS TO | | | LARGE FOR HOUSE PLEASE CORRECT. | | | | | | 6)BALANCED RETURN AIR. | | | THIS MAY BE ACHIEVED BY. | | | (A)TRANSFER DUCTS MAY ACHIEVE THIS BY | | | INCREASING THE RETURN TRANSFER ONE AND | | | ONE HALF TIMES THE CROSS SECTIONAL AREA | | | (SQUARE INCHES) OF THE SUPPLY DUCT | | | ENTERING THE ROOM OR SPACE IT'S SERVING | | | AND THE DOOR HAVING AT LEAST AN | | | UNRESTRICTED 1 INCHUNDERCUT TO ACHIEVE | | | PROPER RETURN AIR BALANCE. | | | (B)TRANSFER GRILLES SHALL USE 50 | | | SQUARE INCHES (OF GRILLE AREA) TO 100 | | | CFM (OF SUPPLY AIR) FOR SIZING | | | THROUGH-THE-WALL TRANSFER GRILLES AND | | | USING AN UNRESTRICTED 1-INCH | | | UNDERCUTTING OF DOORS TO ACHIEVE PROPER | | | RETURN AIR BALANCE | | | (C)HABITABLE ROOMS ONLY SHALL BE | | | REQUIRED TO MEET THESE REQUIREMENTS FOR | | | PROPER BALANCED RETURN AIR EXCLUDING | | | BATHROOMS, CLOSETS, STORAGE ROOMS AND | | | LAUNDRY ROOMS, EXCEPT THAT ALL SUPPLY | | | AIR INTO THE MASTER SUITE SHALL BE | | | INCLUDED. PER 2004 FBC/R M1602.4 . | | | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-10-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleech |
Date |
2007-10-03 |
Time |
07:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jleech |
Date |
2007-10-03 |
Time |
07:33 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-10-03 07:47:21 | DENIED; | | | NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION TO DO A PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW. A | | | SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM IS REQUIRED SHOWING ALLSIZES OF | | | WASTE AND VENT PIPES, PER FBC-2004 BUILDING CODE | | | CHAPTER 1 ADMINISTRATION, SECTION 106.3.5(9). | | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | JOHN LEECH | | | 805-6695 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-02-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleech |
Date |
2007-02-06 |
Time |
07:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jleech |
Date |
2007-02-06 |
Time |
07:06 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-02-06 08:05:26 | DENIED; | | | 1. SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM NOT TO CODE. | | | A) AUTOMATIC CLOTHES WASHER DRAIN IS REQUIRED | | | TO BE 3" AND MUST BE VENTED WITH C.O. AT 48". NOTE 10 | | | AND11 SHOULD BE SHOW ON THE RISER DIAGRAM. | | | B) FIRST FLOOR SINK VENT TIED INTO SECOND | | | FLOOR WASTE STACK. NOT A VENT. | | | C) WATER CLOSET NOT VENTED. | | | D) TUB NOT VENTED. | | | E) TUB NOT VENTED. | | | F)SHOWER NOT VENTED. | | | G) SECOND FLOOR KITCHEN SINK MUST DISCHARGE | | | DOWN STREAM OF THE BATHROOM GROUP. SEC.909.1. | | | H) SECOND FLOOR MASTER BATHROOM NOT DRAWN | | | CORRECTLY. | | | I)USE PROPER NAMES FOR FIXTURES. ( | | | BATHROOMS HAVE LAVATORIES NOT SINKS). | | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | JOHN LEECH | | | 805-6695 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-11-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleech |
Date |
2006-11-02 |
Time |
12:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jleech |
Date |
2006-11-02 |
Time |
12:50 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-11-02 12:57:25 | DENIED; | | | 1.RISER DIAGRAM DOES NOT MATCH FLAT DRAWING. TOO MANY | | | CODE VIOLATIONS TO LIST. | | | RISER DIAGRAM MARKED IN RED. | | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | JOHN LEECH | | | 805-6695 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-07-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleech |
Date |
2006-07-25 |
Time |
12:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jleech |
Date |
2006-07-25 |
Time |
12:22 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-07-25 00:00:00 | DENIED; | | | 1.SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM IS NOT TO CODE; | | | A)FIRST FLOOR REVENTS MUST EXTEND 6" | | | ABOVE THE HIGHEST FIXTURE ON THE | | | SECOND FLOOR BEFORE REVENTING INTO | | | THE VENT STACK. | | | B)TOILET ON FIRST FLOOR CANNOT BE | | | INSTALLED DIRECTLY INTO THE BUILD- | | | DRAIN, NOT VENTED PROPERY. | | | C)WATER HEATER IS NOT PART OF THE | | | SANITARY SYSTEM AND SHOULD NOT | | | BE SHOWN ON THE RISER DIAGRAM. | | | D)AUTOMATIC CLOTHES WASHER DRAIN, | | | STAND PIPE AND VENT WITH CLEANOUT | | | NOT DRAWN. DRAIN FOR THE W/M IS | | | REQUIRED TO BE 3" AND A CLEANOUT TO | | | BE AT 48" AFF. SEE SEC. 406.3 AND | | | 708..3.4. | | | E)DISHWASHER MUST DICHARGE INDIRECTLY | | | INTO THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM. | | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | JOHN LEECH | | | 805-6695 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-09-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
choops |
Date |
2007-09-19 |
Time |
09:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
choops |
Date |
2007-09-19 |
Time |
09:55 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-09-19 10:26:38 | ***FAILED - RESUB #5?*** | | | | | | REPEAT COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1)THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT HAS NO RECORD | | | THAT THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH APPROVED THIS | | | SUBDIVISION.THE PROPERTY OWNER SHALL EITHER PROVIDE | | | PROOF THAT THE LOT SPLIT WAS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING | | | AND ZONING DEPARTMENT OR SHALL APPLY FOR A MINOR | | | SUBDIVISION THROUGH THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT. | | | THE LOT IS UNBUILDABLE UNTIL SUCH TIME THAT THE MINOR | | | SUBDIVISION IS APPROVED. | | | | | | 2)POOL TO BE UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. PLANS (INCLUDING | | | SURVEY) SHALL REFLECT SUCH. | | | | | | 3)SURVEY SHOWS A 24' SETBACK TO FRONT COVERED ENTRY. | | | REVISE...MUST BE A 25' SETBACK TO FRONT COVERED ENTRY. | | | | | | 4)ELEVATION DIMENSIONS TO BE MEASURED FROM GRADE. | | | | | | 5)PROPOSED A/C EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SHOWN ON SITE | | | PLAN/SURVEY WITH SETBACK DIMENSIONS TO THE PROPERTY | | | LINES. (MAY NOT ENCROACH MORE THAN 4' INTO ANY REQUIRED | | | SETBACK.) | | | | | | NEW COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1)SURVEY PROVIDED IS LABELED AS 423 WILDER, THE | | | ADDRESS ON THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS 427 WILDER. | | | CLARIFY. | | | | | | 2)NEWLY SUBMITTED PLANS DO NOT SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH | | | SECTION 94-442 OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS, REGARDING LANDSCAPING.A LANDSCAPE PLAN | | | SHALL BE SUBMITTED SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SAID | | | SECTION. | | | | | | 3)NEWLY SUBMITTED PLANS DO NOT SHOW A | | | DRIVEWAY/DIMENSIONS OF A DRIVEWAY/SQUARE FOOTAGE OF A | | | DRIVEWAY.IF DRIVEWAY IS BEING PROPOSED, INCLUDE | | | DIMENSIONS AND SQUARE FOOTAGE. | | | | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT CHRIS HOOPS, ZONING | | | TECHNICIAN | | | (561)805-6720 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-08-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
choops |
Date |
2007-08-17 |
Time |
16:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
choops |
Date |
2007-08-17 |
Time |
16:47 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-08-17 16:49:51 | ***FAILED*** | | | | | | REPEAT COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1)THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT HAS NO RECORD | | | THAT THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH APPROVED THIS | | | SUBDIVISION.THE PROPERTY OWNER SHALL EITHER PROVIDE | | | PROOF THAT THE LOT SPLIT WAS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING | | | AND ZONING DEPARTMENT OR SHALL APPLY FOR A MINOR | | | SUBDIVISION THROUGHT THE PLANNING AND ZONING | | | DEPARTMENT.THE LOT IS UNBUILDABLE UNTIL SUCH TIME | | | THAT THE MINOR SUBDIVISION IS APPROVED. | | | | | | 2)FENCE/WALL/DECK/POOL TO BE UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. | | | PLANS SHALL REFLECT SAID STRUCTURES AS SUCH. | | | | | | 3)SURVEY SHOWS A 24' SETBACK TO FRONT COVERED ENTRY. | | | SITE PLAN SHOWS THE REQUIRED 25' SETBACK.CLARIFY. | | | | | | 4)ELEVATION DIMENSIONS TO BE MEASURED FROM GRADE. | | | | | | NEW COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1)PROPOSED A/C EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SHOWN ON SITE | | | PLAN/SURVEY WITH SETBACK DIMENSIONS TO THE PROPERTY | | | LINES. (MAY NOT ENCROACH MORE THAN 4' INTO ANY REQUIRED | | | SETBACK.) | | | | | | | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT CHRIS HOOPS, ZONING | | | TECHNICIAN | | | (561)805-6720 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-01-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2007-01-18 |
Time |
17:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2007-01-18 |
Time |
17:50 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-01-18 18:09:44 | FAILED | | | | | | 1) THE PROPERTY APPRAISER ISSUED THE NEW PCN IN 2002. | | | THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT HAS NO RECORD THAT | | | THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH APPROVED THE SUBDIVISION. | | | THE PROPERTY OWNER SHALL EITHER PROVIDE PROOF THAT THE | | | LOT SPLIT WAS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING | | | DEPARTMENT OR HE SHALL APPLY FOR A MINOR SUBDIVISION | | | THROUGH THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT.THIS LOT | | | IS UNBUILDABLE UNTIL SUCH TIME THAT THE MINOR AMENDMENT | | | IS APPROVED. | | | | | | 2) NO SURVEY SUBMITTED WITH THE RESUBMITTED PLANS - | | | FULL SIZE OR REDUCED AS STATED IN THE ARCHITECT'S | | | RESPONSE. | | | | | | 3) ELEVATIONS ARE STILL MISLABELED - THE EAST AND WEST | | | ELEVATION ARE BACKWARDS AND NOW THE ADDITION OF NORTH | | | AND SOUTH ARE ON THE WRONG SIDES OF THE BUILDING. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (822) 822-1435. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-10-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2006-10-17 |
Time |
11:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2006-10-13 |
Time |
14:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2006-10-17 10:51:44 | FAILED | | | | | | 1) PROVIDE EVIDENCE THAT THE CITY APPROVED THE | | | SUBDIVISION TO CREATE THIS PARCEL, OR THAT THIS PARCEL | | | HAS ALWAYS HAD A SEPERATE DEED AND PCN FROM 423 WILDER | | | ST. | | | | | | 2) NO SURVEY SUBMITTED WITH THE RESUBMITTED PLANS. | | | | | | 3) PLEASE SHOW THE LOCATION AND SPECIES OF THE 7 | | | REQUIRD SHRUBS AND LIST THE SPECIES OF THE 3 EXISTING | | | TREES (THEY SHALL BE SHADE OR FLOWERING TO MEET CODE | | | REQUIREMENTS). | | | | | | 4) BUILDING HEIGHT SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE PLANS MEETING | | | CITY STANDARDS (MID-POINT FROM EVE TO RIDGE). | | | | | | 5) ELEVATIONS ARE MISLABLED - LEFT AND RIGHT SIDES NOT | | | CORRECT BASED ON THE PLAN - SHOULD USE EAST AND WEST | | | ELEVATION. | | | | | | 6) FRONT ROOF OVERHANG AND BALCONY RAIL CAP EXTEND | | | FURTHER THAN 3 FEET INTO THE FRONT SETBACK. | | | | | | 7) REAR BALCONY EXTENDS FURTHER THAN 3 FEET INTO THE | | | REAR SETBACK. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (822) 822-1435. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-07-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mmclean |
Date |
2006-07-27 |
Time |
10:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mmclean |
Date |
2006-07-27 |
Time |
10:48 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-07-27 00:00:00 | DENIED, | | | 1. THE SITEPLAN AND SURVEY DOES NOT | | | MATCH (LAYOUT OF THE STRUCTURE).PLEASE | | | PROVIDE TWO COPY OF THE PROPOSED WORK. | | | 2. THE DRIVEWAY OF THE PROPOSED WORK | | | DOES NOT MATCH, NEED TO PROVIDE THE | | | PROPOSED WORK OF THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY | | | | | | NOTE:MUST MAINTAIN 1000SQ FT OR 75% OF | | | LANDSCAPE, WHICHEVER IS LESS WITHIN THE | | | FIRST 25FT FRONT SETBACK. | | | | | | 3. THE SETBACK FOR THE PROPOSED COVERED | | | PATIO MUST SIT BACK 25FT. THE ROOF CAN | | | ONLY PROJECT 3FT INTO THE 25FT FRONT | | | SETBACK. | | | 4. SEPERATE PERMIT MUST BE PULLED FOR | | | THE POOL/DECK/WALL/GATE/FENCE (FENCE | | | REQUIRES AN APPROVAL FROM THE CITY OF | | | WEST PALM BEACH UTILITY DEPT). | | | 5. THE STRUCTURAL OVERHANG PROJECTION | | | SHALL NOT EXTEND FARTHER THAN THREE FEET | | | INTO ANY SETBACK. | | | | | | MICHELLE MCLEAN | | | ZONING TECHNICIAN | | | 805-6720 |
|
|
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |