Plan Review Details - Permit 06070445
Plan Review Stops For Permit 06070445
Review Stop AD ADDRESSING
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop AD ADDRESSING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2006-10-19 Cont ID  
Sent By lursu Date 2006-10-19 Time 08:35 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lursu Date 2006-10-19 Time 08:35 Sent To  
Notes
2006-10-19 08:40:55EXT # 0007 FOR 2029 OKEECHOBEE BLVD MUST BE USED FOR
 THE SHELL PERMIT
2006-10-19 08:40:512029 OKEECHOBEE BLVD
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2007-06-15 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2007-06-15 Time 10:05 Rev Time 5.55
Received By jwitmer Date 2007-06-15 Time 10:05 Sent To PC
Notes
2007-06-15 10:14:54BUILDING PLAN REVIEW
 PERMIT: 06070445
 ADD: 2029 OKEECHOBEE BLVD
 CONT: BOCA DEVEL & CONST
 TEL: (954) 5886695
 FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE
 * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS
  
 3RDREVIEW
 ACTION: DENIED
  
 1)--- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT ---
 PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE!
 WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION &
 REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL
 LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH
 A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE
 SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE
 FOUND
 WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR
 ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.
  
 2)) FL S S 713.13NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE
 FILED WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT.NOTE: 713.13(2) IF
 THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OFCOMMENCEMENT IS
 NOT ACTUALLYCOMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE
 RECORDING THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & VOID. NOTE:
 713.13(6)THE POSTING OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AT
 THE CONSTRUCTION SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION.
  
 3) NEW COMMENT: SINCE THE LAST COMMENT THE SCOPE OF
 WORK HAS CHANGED, THAT THE EXISTING ROOF WAS REMOVED
 AND THAT THE WALLS,COLUMNS, FLOOR AND FOOTING/
 FOUNDATIONS HAVE ALL BEEN REMOVED
 FOR THIS PORTION OF THE BUILDING BAY 1,2& 3. SHEET A1.2
 STE DATAUNDER TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION : LIST TO MATCH
 EXISTING CONSTRUCTION? THE FOLLOWING ARE ITEMS REQUIRED
 TO BE ON THE PLAN BEFORE ISSUANCE:
 3A) (1)110.2* W. P. B. ADMINISTRATIVE CODE,
 INFORMATION THAT IS REQUIRED FOR RECORD KEEPING & FOR
 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY:
 (2) THE EDITION OF THE CODE UNDER WHICH THE
 PROJECT WAS DESIGNED.
 2004/2005 FBC- BUILDING AND THE 2004/2005
 FBC EXISTING BUILDING CODE, WHAT LEVEL OF ALTERATION:
 LEVEL 3, THIS IS NOW AN ADDITION TO THE BASE BUILDING.
 B) THE USE AND OCCUPANCY, IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER
 3.
 (3)THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION AS DEFINED IN
 CHAPTER 6, TABLE 601.
 (4)THE OCCUPANT LOAD, SEE 1004.
 (5)IF AN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM IS
 PROVIDED, WHETHER THE SPRINKLER SYSTEM IS REQUIRED. (6)
 ANY SPECIAL STIPULATIONS & CONDITIONS OF THE BUILDING
 PERMIT.
 (7) SQ. FT. FOOTPRINT
  
 3B) FBC* 105.3RESIDENT INSPECTOR. SUBMIT INSPECTOR
 RESUME' AND LICENSE DOCUMENTS TO HAROLD PISKURA,
 DIRECTOR OF THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR PROGRAM.A RESIDENT
 INSPECTOR PROGRAM IS REQUIRED,
 ON THIS PROJECT, DUE TO ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: X
 - BUILDINGS/ADDITIONS OF TYPE I OR II
 CONSTRUCTION
 - ANY MAJOR STRUCTURAL ALTERATIONS
 - STRUCTURES IN WHICH THE CONCRETE
 DESIGN IS BASED ON COMPRESSIVE
 STRENGTH (F'C) IN EXCESS OF 3000 PSI
 - PILE DRIVING
 - BUILDINGS OVER 20,000 SQFT IN AREA
 - BUILDINGS OVER 2 STORIES IN HEIGHT
 - BUILDING/STRUCTURES OF UNUSUAL DESIGN
 OR METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION
  
 3C)SINCE THIS BUILDING WILL REQUIRE A RESIDENT
 INSPECTOR ,(3) OF ALL DOCUMEENTS WILL BE REQUIRED TO
 BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY.
  
 4)SUBMITTED ARE 2 ORIGINAL SIGNED AND SEALED SOILS
 REPORTS, NOW (3) WILL BE REQUIRED.
  
 5) NOT REQUIRED, AS THE ROOF DECK AND BAR JOIST HAVE
 BEEN REMOVED.
  
 6) COMPLIED. SURVEYS SHOW A NEW UTILITY EASEMENT.
  
 7)3RD REQUEST, TABLE 602, DEALS WITH THE BUILDING NOT
 TO TRANSGRESS ACROSS PROPERTY LINES. COMMENTS
 FROM THE LAST REVIEW INDICATE THE OWNERS ARE PROCEEDING
 TOWARDS SECURING A UNITY OF TITLE. PLEASE PROVIDE A
 COPY OF THE RECORDEDNOTICE
 OF COMMENCEMENT WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT.
  
 8) COMMENT#(10) FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW, DEALS WITH
 CHARTER 13 ENERGY, ONE BIG CHANGE IN THE CODE DEALS
 WITH ELECTRICAL
 COMMENT# 3, AUTOMATIC LIGHTING CONTROLS, FBC
 12-415.1.ABC 1.1, 1.2.
  
 9)3RDREQUEST COMMENT# 11 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW,
 DEALS WITH THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONSDESIGNED TO ASCE
 7-98 VS. THE STRUCTURAL PLANS DESIGNED TO ASCE 7-02.
 RESPONCE COMMENTS REFER TO STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS? PLEASE
 ELABORATE WHERE THIS DOCUMENT COULD BE FOUND?
  
 10-12) COMPLIED.
  
 13) COMMENT# 16 FROM THE 1ST REVIEW,
 FL BLD CODE 1606.1.5: COMPONENTS &
 CLADDING, PROVIDE 2 COPIES(3 IF THRESH-
 OLD OR RESIDENT INSPECTOR) OF PRODUCT
 TESTING REPORTS,MISSING REPORTS ARE AS
 FOLLOWS:
 A) STOREFRONT SYSTEMS/ MULLIONS
 B) GLAZED SWING DOORS
 C) ROOF ASSEMBLIES- HIGHLIGHT WHICH SUB-SYSTEM TO BE
 INSTALLED SEE IF LIMITATION 7 OR 9 IS INVOLED!
 D) PREMANUFACTURED METAL A/C STANDS
 E) METAL BAHAMA SHUTTERS SEE NOTE!16
  
 14) COMMENT# 17FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW,
 PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH
 PERMIT APPLICATION AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003
 ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA
 PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR INFORMATION
 PLEASE SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT
 WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG.
 PRODUCTS WITH STATEWIDE APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE
 SUBMITTED WITH A COVER SHEET THAT LISTS
 THE PRODUCT IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE
 STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT HAVE
 STATEWIDE APPROVAL, SUBMIT AN APPLICA-
 TION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR SITE
 SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE 9B-72. SEE
 ATTACHMENT. WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG
  
 15) COMMENT# 18FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW,
 W P B ADMINISTRTIVE CODE 106.3.3*
 PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH
 ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE
 REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE
 DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL
 FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL.
  
 16) 2ND REQUEST, COMMENT# 19 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW,
 METAL BAHAMA SHUTTERS- TO BE INSTALLED IN THE FIXED
 OPEN POSITION, SHUTTERS WILL REQUIRE ENGINEERING IN THE
 OPEN POSITION. THIS SYSTEM WILL NOT
 REQUIRE FL COVERSHEET. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL
 DOCUMENTATION FROM AN ENGINEER SHOWING THAT THEY WILL
 WITHSTAND 140 MPH WIND IN THE OPEN POSITION. THEY ARE
 DESIGNED TAND TESTED IN THE CLOSED POSITION.
  
 BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY
 BE ISSUED, IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO
 PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL PERMIT
 SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT
 OFFICE, AND A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT
 ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT APPLICATION.
 PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE
 INFORMATION.
  
 BUILDING PLAN REVIEW
 JIM WITMER C. B. O.
  
 TEL: (561)805-6715
 FAX: (561)659-8026
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2007-01-12 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2007-01-12 Time 14:09 Rev Time 7.77
Received By jwitmer Date 2007-01-12 Time 06:55 Sent To  
Notes
2007-01-12 14:12:16BUILDING PLAN REVIEW
 PERMIT: 06070445
 ADD: 2029 OKEECHOBEE BLVD. (SHELL PERMIT)
 CONT: BOCA DEVEL. & CONST.
 TEL: (561)391-6227
 FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE
 EX FBC CODE= 2004 EXISTING FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE
 * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS
  
 2ND REVIEW
 ACTION: DENIED
  
 1)--- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT ---
 PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE!
 WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE
 THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY
 PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER
 LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUM-
 BER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION
 MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICA
 TION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND
 WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK
 YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.
  
 2) FL S S 713.13
 NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED
 WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT BEFORE A
 PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED. NOTE: 713.13(2)
 IF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OFCOMMENCEMENT IS
 NOT ACTUALLY COMMENCED
 WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE RECORDING
 THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & VOID.
  
 3) SEE ADDRESSING COMMENT FROM THE FIRST REVIEW, THE
 ADDRESS TO BE USED FOR THIS SHELL PERMIT IS 2029
 OKEECHOBEE BLVD.2029 SHOULD BE USED
 ON ALL PLANS, PERMIT APPLICATION & ANY SUBMITTALS.
  
 4) COMPLIED.
  
 5) WILL BE A BUILDING PROVISO:
 ENGINEER OF RECORD IRVING ABCUGTO SHALL
 SUBMIT A SHORING PLAN PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OF ANY
 BEARING COMPONENTS.
  
 6) COMPLIED. SURVEYS SHOW A NEW UTILITY EASEMENT.
  
 7)TABLE 602, DEALS WITH THE BUILDING NOT TO
 TRANSGRESS ACROSS PROPERTY LINES. COMMENTS
 FROM THE LAST REVIEW INDICATE THE OWNERS ARE PROCEEDING
 TOWARDS SECURING A UNITY OF TITLE. PLEASE PROVIDE A
 COPY OF THE RECORDEDNOTICE
 OF COMMENCEMENT WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT.
  
 8) COMMENT#(10) FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW, DEALS WITH
 CHARTER 13 ENERGY, ONE BIG CHANGE IN THE CODE DEALS
 WITH ELECTRICAL
 COMMENT# 3, AUTOMATIC LIGHTING CONTROLS, FBC
 12-415.1.ABC 1.1, 1.2.
  
 9)2ND REQUEST COMMENT# 11 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW,
 DEALS WITH THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONSDESIGNED TO ASCE
 7-98 VS. THE STRUCTURAL PLANS DESIGNED TO ASCE 7-02.
 RESPONCE COMMENTS REFER TO STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS? PLEASE
 ELABORATE WHERE THIS DOCUMENT COULD BE FOUND?
  
 10) 2ND REQUEST, COMMENT 13A & 13B:
 10A) (13A) A1.3 SITE PLAN DETAIL A8.1.1DETAIL NUMBER 3,
 PLANS DO NOT PROVIDE THE WIDTH
 OF THE CURB CUT. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS INDICATING
 COMPLIANCE WITH
 CURB CUTS AS USED WITH THIS PLAN.
  
 10B)2ND REQUEST(13C) THE CROSS WALKS THAT LEAD FROM
 THE
 DEISABLED PARKING SPACE TO THE STORES
 DOES NOT LEAD TO THE STORE FRONTS WHERE
 THE COVERED ENTRY IS LOCATED BUT TO A
 SIDEWALK WITH A MUCH SMALLER CANOPY AND
 A FURTHER DISTANCE TO THE STORE FRONT.
 11-2.2 EQUIVALENT FACILITATION.
 RESPONCE INDICATES A NEW SECTION
 BUT THE SECTION DOESN,T SHOW ANY CURB CUTS?
  
 11) 2ND REQUEST, PLANS COMMENT NUMBER (14A) FROM THE
 PREVIOUS REVIEW:
 I SPOKE WITH THE ARCHITECT ABOUT THIS SITUATION, A
 NARRATIVE MAY BE HELPFUL IN INDICATING COMPLIANCE, A1.2
 SITE PLAN INDICATES THE NEW
 CURB CUTS ACCESS AISLES, NEW LANDSCAPE
 AND NEW LANDSCAPED ISLAND. EX FBC 706
 A BUILDING, FACILITY OR ELEMENT THAT IS
 ALTERED SHALL COMPLY WITH CHAPTER 11 OF
 THE FBC, BUILDING.
 11-4.6.2(1) ALL PARKING SPACES MUST
 BE LOCATED ON AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE NO
 LESS THAN 44 INCHES (1118 MM)WIDE SO
 THAT USERS WILL NOT BE COMPELLED TO WALK
 OR WHEEL BEHIND PARKED VEHICLES
 THIS PLAN DOES NOT PROVIDE THE
 DISABLED ACCESS TO THE SSTORES WITHOUT
 TRAVELING BEHIND SOMEONE ELSES PARKED
 VEHICLE.
 NOTE, 11-4.1.6(2) DUTY TO PROVIDE AN
 ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL TO ALTERED
 AREAS SHALL BE DEEMED DISPROPORTIONATE
 TO THE OVERALL ALTERATION WHEN THE COST
 EXCEEDS 20 % OF THE COST OF THE ALTERA-
 TION TO THE PRIMARY FUNCTION AREA.
 (A)(I) AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE
 (II) AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE
 (III) AT LEAST ONE ACCESSIBLE REST-
 ROOM FOR EACH SEX OR A SINGLE
 UNISEX RESTROOM
 (IIII) ACCESSIBLE TELEPHONE
 (IV) ELEMENTS SUCH AS PARKING, STOR-
 AGE OR ALARMS.
 PLEASE PROVIDE AN ALYSIS OF MONIES
 SPENT TO MEET THE 20% OF CONTRACT VALUE.
  
 12) 2ND REQUEST COMMENT# (14B) FROM THE PREVIOUS
 REVIEW,
 14B) THE SECOND ISSUE IS THE CROSS WALKS
 AND HANDICAPPED ACCESS
 AISLES,11-4.6.2(1) SO THAT NO USER WILL
 NOT BE COMPELLED TO WALK OR WHEEL BEHIND
 PARKED VEHICLES.
 A1.1.3 THE DEMO PLAN DOESN'T
 INDICATE THE SITE AS IS NOW.
 11-4.1.6(1)
 GENERAL. ALTERATIONS TO EXISTING
 BUILDINGS AND FACILITIES SHALL COMPLY
 WITH THE FOLLOWING:
 (A)NO ALTERATION SHALL BE
 UNDERTAKEN WHICH DECREASES OR HAS THE
 EFFECT OF DECREASING ACCESSIBILITY OR
 USABILITY OF A BUILDING OR FACILITY
 BELOW THE REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW
 CONSTRUCTION AT THE TIME OF ALTERATION.
 (B)IF EXISTING ELEMENTS, SPACES, OR
 COMMON AREAS ARE ALTERED, THEN EACH SUCH
 ALTERED ELEMENT, SPACE, FEATURE, OR AREA
 SHALL COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE
 PROVISIONS OF SECTION 11-4.1.1 TO
 SECTION 11-4.1.3 , MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
 FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION. IF THE APPLICABLE
 PROVISION FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION REQUIRES
 THAT AN ELEMENT, SPACE, OR COMMON AREA
 BE ON AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, THE ALTERED
 ELEMENT, SPACE, OR COMMON AREA IS NOT
 REQUIRED TO BE ON AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE
 EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SECTION 11-4.1.6
 (2), ALTERATIONS TO AN AREA CONTAINING A
 PRIMARY FUNCTION.
  
 13) COMMENT# 16 FROM THE 1ST REVIEW,
 FL BLD CODE 1606.1.5: COMPONENTS &
 CLADDING, PROVIDE 2 COPIES(3 IF THRESH-
 OLD OR RESIDENT INSPECTOR) OF PRODUCT
 TESTING REPORTS,MISSING REPORTS ARE AS
 FOLLOWS:
 A) STOREFRONT SYSTEMS/ MULLIONS
 B) GLAZED SWING DOORS
 C) EXTERIOR METAL SWING DOORS
 D)ROLL UP DOORS
 E)LOUVERS
 F) ROOF ASSEMBLIES
 G) PREMANUFACTURED METAL A/C STANDS
 H) METAL BAHAMA SHUTTERS SEE NOTE!
  
 14) COMMENT# 17FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW,
 PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH
 PERMIT APPLICATION AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003
 ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA
 PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR INFORMATION
 PLEASE SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT
 WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG.
 PRODUCTS WITH STATEWIDE APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE
 SUBMITTED WITH A COVER SHEET THAT LISTS
 THE PRODUCT IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE
 STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT HAVE
 STATEWIDE APPROVAL, SUBMIT AN APPLICA-
 TION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR SITE
 SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE 9B-72. SEE
 ATTACHMENT. WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG
  
 15) COMMENT# 18FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW,
 W P B ADMINISTRTIVE CODE 106.3.3*
 PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH
 ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE
 REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE
 DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL
 FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL.
  
 16) 2ND REQUEST, COMMENT# 19 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW,
 METAL BAHAMA SHUTTERS- TO BE
 INSTALLED IN THE FIXED OPEN POSITION,
 SHUTTERS WILL REQUIRE ENGINEERING IN THE
 OPEN POSITION. THIS SYSTEM WILL NOT
 REQUIRE FL COVERSHEET.
  
 17)BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY
 BE ISSUED, IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO
 PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL PERMIT
 SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT
 OFFICE, AND A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT
 ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT APPLICATION.
 PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE
 INFORMATION.
  
 BUILDING PLAN REVIEW
 JIM WITMER C. B. O.
  
 TEL: (561)805-6715
 FAX: (561)659-8026
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2006-08-11 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2006-08-11 Time 08:43 Rev Time 22.67
Received By jwitmer Date 2006-08-11 Time 08:43 Sent To  
Notes
2006-08-11 00:00:00BUILDING PLAN REVIEW
 PERMIT: 06070445
 ADD: 2015 OKEECHOBEE BLVD.
 CONT: BOCA DEVEL. & CONST.
 TEL: (561)391-6227
 FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE
 EX FBC CODE= 2004 EXISTING FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE
 * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS
  
 1ST REVIEW
 ACTION: DENIED
  
 1)--- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT ---
 PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE!
 WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE
 THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY
 PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER
 LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUM-
 BER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION
 MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICA
 TION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND
 WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK
 YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.
  
 2) FL S S 713.13
 NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED
 WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT BEFORE A
 PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED. NOTE: 713.13(2)
 IF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT IS
 NOT ACTUALLY COMMENCED
 WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE RECORDING
 THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & VOID.
  
 3) ARCHITECT STEVEN L. COHEN AR0006819
 IS WORKING WITH A DELINGUENT LICENSE,
 EXPIRED 02/28/05.
 WWW.MYFLORIDA.COM/LICENSING
  
 4) PLANS INDICATE THAT A SOILS
 INVESTIGATION IS TO BE COMPLETED.
 FL BLD CODE 1804.2.2 QUESTIONABLE
 SOILS, WHERE THE BEARING CAPACITY IS
 NOT DEFINETLY KNOWN OR IS IN QUESTION.
 WHERE THE BEARING CAPACITY OF THE SOIL
 IS NOT DEFINITLY KNOWN OR IS IN QUESTION
 THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MAY REQUIRE EXPLOR
 ATIONS, TEST OR OTHER ADEQUATE PROOF AS
 TO THE PERMISSIBLE SAFE BEARING
 CAPACITY. REQUIRED TEST AND RECOMMENDA-
 TIONS SUBMITTED TO VERIFY BEARING CAPA-
 CITY SHALL BE CERTIFIED BY A GEOTECH-
 NICALREPORT FROM A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL
 PROPERLY LICENSED IN THE STATE OF
 FLORIDA.
  
 5) A1.1.4 PLANS INDICATE THE USE OF ROOF
 SHORING DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS TO BE
 SEALED BY ENGINEER. PLEASE PROVIDE THESE
 SHORING PLANS.
  
 6) PLEASE PROVIDE SOME CLARITY ON AN
 ISSUE. SHEET A1.2 NORTH WALL OF THE
 PROJECT THERE APPEARS TO BE NEW
 EXTENSIONS (LOADING DOCKS) IN BAYS 1&2.
 A2.1 CLEARLY INDICATES THE NEW WORK TO
 BE COMPLETED, BUT NO VISIBLE PROPERTY
 LINES. ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY
 DATED 4/08/05 INDICATES ONE LARGE LOT,
 WHERE AS THE SURVEY COMPLETED BY WALLACE
 DATED 1/25/06 CLEARLY INDICATES TWO LOTS
 WITH A 20' DEDICATED ALLEY WITH A 20'
 INGRESS/ EGRESS EASEMENT.
 PLEASE INDICATE WHERE THE PROPERTY LINE
 IS LOCATED ON THE ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS
 TO SEE IF THE NEW EXTENTIONS CREATE
 TABLE 601 & TABLE 704.8 ISSUES.
  
 7) INTALKING WITH VINCE NOEL IN
 ENGINEERING ( CITY SURVEYOR) THIS NEW
 PROPERTY WILL ALSO NEED TO BE TIED TO
 THE PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH WHICH THE
 BUILDING SITS ON TO CREATE ONE PROPERTY
 SO THE NEW ADDITIONS DO NOT CROSS
 PROPERTY LINES AND PROVIDES THE REQUIRED
 AREA BY TABLE 704.8 FOR OPENINGS.
  
 8) THE OTHER ISSUE VINCE NOEL BROUGHT UP
 IS THE REROUTING OF ALL UTILITIES THAT
 NOW WILL NEED TO FOLLOW THE NEWLY
 CREATED INGRESS/ EGRESS EASEMENT.
 PERMITS NEED TO BE OBTAINED FOR THIS
 WORK.
  
 9) NOTE:8-14-06I SPOKE WITH HAROLD
 PISKURA THE MANAAGER OF THE RESIDENT
 INSPECTOR PROGRAM TO SEE IF A RESIDENT
 INSPECTOR WOULD BE NEEDED FOR THIS
 PROJECT. HAROLD INDICATED THAT A
 RESIDENT INSPECTOR "WOULDN"T" BE
 REQUIRED.
  
 10) ENERGY FORMS: EXISTING BUILDING CODE
 708.1 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. ALTERATIONS
 SUBJECT TO THIS CHARTER SHALL COMPLY
 WITH THE REQUIREMEENTS OF CHAPTER 13 OF
 THE FBC, BUILDING.
 13-101.1.6
 SHELL BUILDINGS.
 NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS THAT ARE
 PERMITTED PRIOR TO DESIGN COMPLETION OR
 WHICH WILL BE FINISHED IN SECTIONS AT A
 TIME AFTER CONSTRUCTION OF THE SHELL
 SHALL COMPLY WITH EITHER METHOD B OR C
 OF SUBCHAPTER 13-4 OF THE CODE PRIOR TO
 GRANTING OF A PERMIT TO BUILD. ALL
 ASSUMPTIONS MADE ABOUT FEATURES NOT
 INSTALLED UNTIL LATER THAT ARE NOT ON
 THE BUILDING PLANS SHALL BE LISTED AND
 APPENDED TO THE COMPLIANCE FORM
 SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT.
 UNLESS THE BUILDING IS COMPLETED AS PER
 ALL ASSUMPTIONS MADE IN THE ORIGINAL
 CODE COMPLIANCE SUBMITTAL, A REVISED
 CODE SUBMITTAL(S) USING METHODS A, B OR
 C SHALL BE SUBMITTED WHEN COMPLETION OF
 THE BUILDING (OR PART OF THE BUILDING)
 IS PERMITTED.
  
 11)A1.1 CODE ANALYSIS INDICATES THIS
 IS A LEVEL 3 ALTERATION. 707.5.1 AN
 ENGINEERING EVALUATION AND ANYLSIS THAT ESTABLISHES THE
 STRUCTURAL ADEQUACY OF
 THE ALTERED STRUCTURE SHALL BE PREPARED
 BY A REGISTERED ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER
 AND SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL.
 THE EVALUATION AND ANYLISIS SHALL
 DEMONSTRATE THAT THE ALTERED BUILDING OR
 STRUCTURE COMPLIES WITH THE FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE, BUILDING FOR WIND
 LOADING.
 THE REPORT SUBMITTED WAS CALCULATED
 UNDER THE ASCE 7-98 WHEREAS THE 2004 FBC
 IS UNDER THE ASCE 7-02.
  
 12)A1.1 CODE ANALYSIS, INDICATES THIS
 EXISTING BUILDING IS TO COMPLY WITH
 LEVEL 3 ALTERATIONS, IT IS ALSOREQUIRED
 TO COMPLY WITH EXISTING BUILDING CODE
 FOR ADDITIONS CHAPTER 9. PROVIDE
 COMPLIANCE WITH 902.2 AREA LIMITATIONS.
 IF AREA INCREASES ARE TAKEN PROVIDE THE CALULATIONS.
  
 13A) A1.3 SITE PLAN DETAIL A8.1.1DETAIL
 NUMBER 3, PLANS DO NOT PROVIDE THE WIDTH
 OF THE CURB CUT.
  
 13B) A1.3 SITE PLAN DETAIL A8.1.2
 DETAIL# 2 ON THAT SHEET, NO SUCH DETAIL.
  
  
 13C) THE CROSS WALKS THAT LEAD FROM THE
 DEISABLED PARKING SPACE TO THE STORES
 DOES NOT LEAD TO THE STORE FRONTS WHERE
 THE COVERED ENTRY IS LOCATED BUT TO A
 SIDEWALK WITH A MUCH SMALLER CANOPY AND
 A FURTHER DISTANCE TO THE STORE FRONT.
 11-2.2 EQUIVALENT FACILITATION.
  
 14A) A1.2 SITE PLAN INDICATES THE NEW
 CURB CUTS ACCESS AISLES, NEW LANDSCAPE
 AND NEW LANDSCAPED ISLAND. EX FBC 706
 A BUILDING, FACILITY OR ELEMENT THAT IS
 ALTERED SHALL COMPLY WITH CHAPTER 11 OF
 THE FBC, BUILDING.
 11-4.6.2(1) ALL PARKING SPACES MUST
 BE LOCATED ON AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE NO
 LESS THAN 44 INCHES (1118 MM)WIDE SO
 THAT USERS WILL NOT BE COMPELLED TO WALK
 OR WHEEL BEHIND PARKED VEHICLES
 THIS PLAN DOES NOT PROVIDE THE
 DISABLED ACCESS TO THE SSTORES WITHOUT
 TRAVELING BEHIND SOMEONE ELSES PARKED
 VEHICLE.
 NOTE, 11-4.1.6(2) DUTY TO PROVIDE AN
 ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL TO ALTERED
 AREAS SHALL BE DEEMED DISPROPORTIONATE
 TO THE OVERALL ALTERATION WHEN THE COST
 EXCEEDS 20 % OF THE COST OF THE ALTERA-
 TION TO THE PRIMARY FUNCTION AREA.
 (A)(I) AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE
 (II) AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE
 (III) AT LEAST ONE ACCESSIBLE REST-
 ROOM FOR EACH SEX OR A SINGLE
 UNISEX RESTROOM
 (IIII) ACCESSIBLE TELEPHONE
 (IV) ELEMENTS SUCH AS PARKING, STOR-
 AGE OR ALARMS.
 PLEASE PROVIDE AN ALYSIS OF MONIES
 SPENT TO MEET THE 20% OF CONTRACT VALUE.
  
 14B) THE SECOND ISSUE IS THE CROSS WALKS
 AND HANDICAPPED ACCESS
 AISLES,11-4.6.2(1) SO THAT NO USER WILL
 NOT BE COMPELLED TO WALK OR WHEEL BEHIND
 PARKED VEHICLES.
 A1.1.3 THE DEMO PLAN DOESN'T
 INDICATE THE SITE AS IS NOW.
 11-4.1.6(1)
 GENERAL. ALTERATIONS TO EXISTING
 BUILDINGS AND FACILITIES SHALL COMPLY
 WITH THE FOLLOWING:
 (A)NO ALTERATION SHALL BE
 UNDERTAKEN WHICH DECREASES OR HAS THE
 EFFECT OF DECREASING ACCESSIBILITY OR
 USABILITY OF A BUILDING OR FACILITY
 BELOW THE REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW
 CONSTRUCTION AT THE TIME OF ALTERATION.
 (B)IF EXISTING ELEMENTS, SPACES, OR
 COMMON AREAS ARE ALTERED, THEN EACH SUCH
 ALTERED ELEMENT, SPACE, FEATURE, OR AREA
 SHALL COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE
 PROVISIONS OF SECTION 11-4.1.1 TO
 SECTION 11-4.1.3 , MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
 FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION. IF THE APPLICABLE
 PROVISION FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION REQUIRES
 THAT AN ELEMENT, SPACE, OR COMMON AREA
 BE ON AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, THE ALTERED
 ELEMENT, SPACE, OR COMMON AREA IS NOT
 REQUIRED TO BE ON AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE
 EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SECTION 11-4.1.6
 (2), ALTERATIONS TO AN AREA CONTAINING A
 PRIMARY FUNCTION.
  
 14C) PLEASE PROVIDE THE AMOUNT OF
 PARKINGSPACES THAT ARE REQUIRED FOR
 EACH OF THE OUT BUILDINGS, AND HOW MANY
 DISABLED SPACES ARE REQUIRED BY
 11-4.1.2(5).
  
 15) A1.3 PLANS INDICATE THE USE OF
 BOLLARDS IN FRONT OF THE STORES BUT NO
 DEMINSION IS PROVIDES FOR CENTER TO
 CENTER?1010.5 RAMPS THAT ARE PART OF A
 REQUIRED MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL NOT BE
 LESS THAN 44 INCHES (1118 MM) WIDE.
  
 16) FL BLD CODE 1606.1.5: COMPONENTS &
 CLADDING, PROVIDE 2 COPIES(3 IF THRESH-
 OLD OR RESIDENT INSPECTOR) OF PRODUCT
 TESTING REPORTS,MISSING REPORTS ARE AS
 FOLLOWS:
 A) STOREFRONT SYSTEMS/ MULLIONS
 B) GLAZED SWING DOORS
 C) EXTERIOR METAL SWING DOORS
 D)ROLL UP DOORS
 E)LOUVERS
 F) ROOF ASSEMBLIES
 G) PREMANUFACTURED METAL A/C STANDS
 H) METAL BAHAMA SHUTTERS SEE NOTE!
  
 17) PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH
 PERMIT APPLICATION AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003
 ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA
 PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR INFORMATION
 PLEASE SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT
 WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. PRODUCTS WITH
 STATEWIDE APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE
 SUBMITTED WITH A COVER SHEET THAT LISTS
 THE PRODUCT IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE
 STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT HAVE
 STATEWIDE APPROVAL, SUBMIT AN APPLICA-
 TION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR SITE
 SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE 9B-72. SEE
 ATTACHMENT. WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG
  
 18) W P B ADMINISTRTIVE CODE 106.3.3*
 PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH
 ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE
 REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE
 DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL
 FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL.
  
 19) METAL BAHAMA SHUTTERS- TO BE
 INSTALLED IN THE FIXED OPEN POSITION,
 SHUTTERS WILL REQUIRE ENGINEERING IN THE
 OPEN POSITION. THIS SYSTEM WILL NOT
 REQUIRE FL COVERSHEET.
  
 20) THE SERIES A8 DRAWINGS SHOW A SERIES
 OF EXTERIOR BLOCK COLUMNS AND THE OTHER
 TWO SIDES OF THE BLOCK COLUMNS BEING
 CLAD IN PLYWOOD, WIRELATH AND STUCCO.
 THE PLANS DEPICTUSE OF 3/4" EXTERIOR
 GRADE PLYWOOD.
  
 20A) SECTION 603 PROVIDES THE
 COMBUSTIBLES THAT ARE ALLOWED IN A TYPE
 II BUILDING. SEE 603.1(1)1.2) NONBEARING
 EXTERIOR WALLS WHERE NO FIRE RESISTANCE
 RATING IS REQUIRED DOES ALLOW FIRE
 RETARDANT TREATED WOOD, NOT JUST
 PLYWOOD.
  
 20B) PLANS DO NOT INDICATE WHAT TYPE OF
 FINISH TO BE APPLIED TO SHEATHING,
 ASSUMED STUCCO? PROVIDE A WATER
 RESISTANCE BARRIER.1404.2
 WATER-RESISTIVE BARRIER.
 A MINIMUM OF ONE LAYER OF NO. 15 ASPHALT
 FELT, COMPLYING WITH ASTM D 226 FOR TYPE
 1 FELT, SHALL BE ATTACHED TO THE
 SHEATHING, WITH FLASHING AS DESCRIBED IN
 SECTION 1405.3 , IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO
 PROVIDE A CONTINUOUS WATER-RESISTIVE
 BARRIER BEHIND THE EXTERIOR WALL VENEER.
  
  
 20C) THE METAL STUDS INDICATE 2X6 BUT
 NOT WHAT GAUGE?
  
 20D) A8.1.4 PORTACO CEILING INDICATES
 USE OF 2X6 NO GAUGE OF STUD? IS THERE TO
 BE STIFF BACKS? WHAT DEFLECTION IS BEING CONSIDERED
 INTO THE DESIGN?
  
 20E) THE PLANS INDICATE ONLY 5/8" SMOOTH
 STUCCO OVER PAPERBACK METAL LATH. THE
 WEIGHT OF THE EXPANDED METAL LATH HASN'T
 BEEN PROVIDED, NOR THE TYPE OF FASTENERS
 NOR THE LENGTH OF THE FASTENERS. SEE
 ASTM C-1063.
  
 20F) PLANS DO NOT PROVIDE WHAT TYPE OF
 FASTENER WILL BE USED TO HOLD THE STEEL
 PLATES TO THE WALL FOR THE STUCCO
 CEILING.
  
 20G) THE PORTACO ROOF SECTION DOES ALSO
 INDICATE THE USE OF 3/4" PLYWOOD. NO
 MENTION OF FIRE RETARDANT TREATED
 PLYWOOD.SEE TABLE 601 NOTE3, ITEM 3.
 NOTE THE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE ROOF
 WILL NEED TO MATCH THE MATERIALS FOR THE
 ROOFING DECK.
  
 21) A8.1.5 BED BATH & BEYOND PORTACO
 INDICATES 2 SECTIONS ONE DETAIL# 3/
 A8.1.5 THE OTHER IS DETAIL# 7/ A8.3
  
 21A) DETAIL3/ A8.1.5 IS A CUT SECTION OF
 THE PORTICO'S NORTH/ SOUTH WALLS
 INDICATING 2X6 STEEL STUD CONSTRUCTION.
  
  
 21B) THE FRONT AND END DETAILS
 (EAST-WEST WALLS) ARE MISLABELED.IF
 DETAILS 2 & 3 OF A8.3 ARE USED THE
 CORRECT CORNICE PROJECTION IS VIEWED,
 BUT THE DETAILS INDICATE BLOCK
 CONSTRUCTION NOT STEEL STUD.
  
 21C) IF STEEL STUDS ARE TO BE USED FOR
 EITHER WALL OR ROOF FRAMING PROVIDE THE
 GAUGE OF STUD, FLANGE WIDTH AND STYLE OF
  
 PRODUCT TO BE USED.
  
 22) A8.1.6 COMP USA PORTACO INDICATES BY
 ELEVATION 25'-10 START OF NEW WORK BUT
 CROSS HATCHING SHOWING NEW WORK IS AT A
 LOWER LEVEL? PROVIDE ADDITIONAL
 INFORMATION. 106.1.2*.
  
 23) SHEET A8.2 DETAIL# 1 INDICATES USE
 OF 3/4" EXTERIOR GRADE PRESSURE TREATED
 PLYWOOD NO MENTION OF FIRE RETARDANT
 TREATED PLYWOOD.TABLE 601,
 FOOTNOTE(C)(2)
  
 24) A8.2 SAME DETAIL# 1 INDICATES THE
 USE OF EXPANDED WIRE MESH AND STUCCO, NO
 MENTION OF PAPERBACK MESH, TYPE OF MESH,
 WEIGHT OF MESH NOR SPACING OF FURRING
 ABOVE? SEE ASTM C-1063.
  
 25) A8.4 EXIT PASSAGEWAY DETAIL:
  
 25A) DISCREPANCY THE ACTUAL DETAIL
 INDICATES USE OF 3 5/8" STEEL STUDS
 SPANING A HEIGHT OF 25'-4" NO CENTERS
 WHEREAS THE 1 HR RATED UL-U465 DETAIL
 INDICATES 5 5/8" STEEL STUDS AT 24" O.C.
 NO HEIGHT LIMITATION IS PROVIDED.
  
 25B) TABLE 2508.1 PROVIDES THE STANDARD
 FOR NON-LOAD BEARING WALLS WITH GYPSUM
 BOARD APPLICATION ASTM C-754. SEE
 5.3.1.2 STUD HEIGHTS SHALL BE BASED ON
 DESIGN CRITERIAOF A MINIMUM 5 PSF LOAD
 AND A MINIMUM OF L/120 DEFLECTION.
 APPENDIX A PROVIDES THE LIMITATIONS ON A
  
 3 5/8" STUD @ 24" O.C., L/120 AND A 5
 PSF:MAXIMUM HEIGTH OF 11'-7".
 THIS TABLE ONLY GOES TO A 4" STUD
 WIDTH.
 USING THE ICC - ICBO ER REPORT 4943
 THERE ARE NO TABLES FOR A 5 5/8" STEEL
 STUD , THERE ARE TABLE FOR 6" STUDS.
 USING THE DEFLECTION L/120, 5PSF @ 24" O.C.THICKNESS OF
 27 WHICH IS 22 GAUGE
 THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT IS 21'-11",
 USINGTHE SAME CRITERIA 6" STUD,
 L/120,5PSF, @ 16" O.C. THICKNESS27/ 22
 GAUGE , THE MAXIMUM HEIGTH OF 26'-10".
 USING THE SAME CRITERIA AND
 CHANGING THE CENTERS TO 12" O.C. THE
 MAXIMUM STUD HEIGHT OF 31'-0".
 PLEASE CORRECT PLANS.
  
 26) A10.2 PLANS INDICATE THE USE OF
 STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING ON VAARIOUS
 CURVED CANOPIES.
  
 26A) ON DETAILS 5&9 WHERE THE CANOPY HAS
 A CONCAVE CURVE, AT THE BOTTOM OF THE
 CURVE, RAIN WATER WILL BUILD UP UNDER
 THE STANDING SEAM, WHAT STOPS THE WATER
 FROM LEAKING THROUGH? THERE IS NO DRAIN
 IN EACH BAY? ADITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED.106.1.2*
  
 26B) ON THE CONCAVE SIDE OF THE CANCOPY
 WHAT STOPS THE STANDING METAL SEAM FROM
  
 WRAPPING? ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED.106.1.2*.
  
 26C) PLANS INDICATE THE USSE OF 3/4"
 PLYWOOD NO MENTION OF FIRE RETARDANT
 TREATED WOOD DECK, TABLE 601 FOOTNOTE
 (C)(2).
  
 26D)PLANS INDICATE THE USE OF FOAM
 BANDS, SEE A8.1.6 COMP USA HEIGHT OF 45'-0",S-3ALSO
 SHOWS A HEIGHT OF 43'-8".
 NO FOAM ABOVE 40'-0".
 1406.2.2 ARCHITECTURAL TRIM.
 IN BUILDINGS OF TYPE I, II, III AND IV CONSTRUCTION
 THAT DO NOT EXCEED THREE
 STORIES OR 40 FEET (12 192 MM) IN HEIGHT
 ABOVE GRADE PLANE, EXTERIOR WALL
 COVERINGS SHALL BE PERMITTED TO BE
 CONSTRUCTED OF WOOD WHERE PERMITTED BY
 SECTION 1405.4 OR OTHER EQUIVALENT
 COMBUSTIBLE MATERIAL. COMBUSTIBLE
 EXTERIOR WALL COVERINGS, OTHER THAN
 FIRE-RETARDANT-TREATED WOOD COMPLYING
 WITH SECTION 2303.2 FOR EXTERIOR
 INSTALLATION, SHALL NOT EXCEED 10
 PERCENT OF AN EXTERIOR WALL SURFACE AREA
 WHERE THE FIRE SEPARATION DISTANCE IS 5
 FEET (1524 MM) OR LESS. ARCHITECTURAL
 TRIM THAT EXCEEDS 40 FEET (12 192 MM) IN
 HEIGHT ABOVE GRADE PLANE SHALL BE
 CONSTRUCTED OF APPROVED NONCOMBUSTIBLE
 MATERIALS AND SHALL BE SECURED TO THE
 WALL WITH METAL OR OTHER APPROVED
 NONCOMBUSTIBLE BRACKETS.
  
 27) S3 DETAIL# 3 PLANS INDICATE THE TIE
 IN OF NEW STEEL STUD WALL OVER THE TOP
 OF EXISTING BLOCK WALL. IT APPEARS THAT
 NOT ONLY A STEEL BOTTOM PLATE BUT A 2X
 PLATE IS ALSO INSTALLED. IS THIS PLATE
 SEGMENTED BETWEEN THE STUDS? THE SECOND
 ISSUE IS THE PLANS INDICATE THAT THE
 TAPCON TO BE USED IS A 1/4"X2 1/2" ONLY
 PROVIDING NOT MORE THAN ONE INCH INTO
 THE CONCRETE, WHICH SHEET OF
 CALCULATIONS PROVIDES THIS INFORMATION?
  
 28) BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY BE
 ISSUED, IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM
 BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL PERMIT
 SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT
 OFFICE, AND A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT
 ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT APPLICATION.
 PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE
 INFORMATION.
  
 BUILDING PLAN REVIEW
 JIM WITMER
 TEL: (561)805-6715
 FAX: (561)659-8026
  
  
  
  
  
 .
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2007-04-22 Cont ID  
Sent By dpalmer Date 2007-04-22 Time 14:22 Rev Time 0.00
Received By dpalmer Date 2007-04-22 Time 13:37 Sent To  
Notes
2007-04-22 14:22:03 
 **** UNSAT3RD REVIEW****
  
 ** PLEASE SEE SOME NOTES FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW ARE STILL
 IN QUESTION.
  
 ** PLEASE SEE NOTES FOR TENANT BUILD OUT AS
 COORDINATION FROM BUILD PLANS AND SHELL PLANS NEED TO
 BE ADDRESSED.
  
 ** PLEASE SEE THE RESPONSE LETTER IN PACKAGE ALTHOUGH
 NOT REQUIRED IS THAT OF THE SAME RESPONSE LETTER WHICH
 WAS IN THE BUILD OUT PLANS FOR TENANT. NO RESPONSE
 LETTER COULD BE FOUND FOR THIS REVIEW FOR ELECTRICAL.
  
  
 1) NOTE:PLEASE SEE PLANS STILL MENTION A 2003-2004
 FBC. THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE AS PREVIOUSLY NOTED. THERE IS
 NOT 2003 FBC AND THIS PROJECT IS PERMITTED UNDER THE
 2004 FBC W/ 2005 REVISIONS.
  
 2) NOTE: PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW LIGHTING ETC IS BEING SHOWN
 FOR SPACE/BAY #2 YET THE TENANT BUILD OUT IS
 SUBMITTED?
 PLEASE SEE THAT BAY #2 IS MISSING CIRCUITING FOR
 LIGHTING.
 PLEASE SEE THE LIGHTING IN ENERGY CALCULATIONS DO NOT
 CORRELATE WITH THE PLANS OR THE BUILD OUT PLANS.
 PLEASE SEE FBC CHAPTER 13. PLEASE SEE 13-415.1.AB.1,
 AND 13-415.2 AS A METHOD C ENERGY CALCULATION THAT WAS
 SUBMITTED IS THE SAME OF THAT SUBMITTED ON PREVIOUS
 REVIEW AND NOT CHANGES WERE MADE.
 PLEASE ALSO SEE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEED TO
 CORRELATE WITH THE ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR THE AMOUNT OF
 FIXTURES AND TYPES OF CONTROLS. PLEASE SEE THESE
 INDICATE 400 AND 270 FIXTURES AND MANUAL ON/OFF
 CONTROLS. PLEASE SEE 13-415.2.ABC.1.3,
 13-415.1.ABC.1.4.
 PLEASE SEE FBC CHAPTER 13. PLANS DENOTE THESE AS
 *RENOVATED SPACES*. HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE AS IS DOES NOT
 FALL UNDER THE DEFINITION OF RENOVATED AND ALSO THE
 CHANGE IN OCCUPANCY.
  
 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE VOLTAGE DROP CALCULATIONS WERE
 NOT SUBMITTED AND DO NOT CORRELATE WITH THE BUILD OUT
 PLANS. PLEASE SEE THE DISTANCE OF FEEDERS FROM BAY 2
 AND BAY 3 DO NOT SEEM TO COMPLY WITH PLANS PROVIDE
 WORST CASE VOLTAGE DROP SCENARIOS FOR BRANCH CIRCUITS
 AND FEEDERS PER 13-413.1ABC.1/13-413.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2.
 PLEASE SEE PLANS AS BASED ON THE SCALE PROVIDED ON
 PLANS AND SITE VISIT, THE DISTANCE IS 300FT +/- TO BAY
 #3 ALONE.
  
 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE WHAT APPEARS TO BE A MISPRINT FOR
 THE DESIGNATION OF THE MAIN SWITCH BOARD. RISER SHOWS
 MSB AND PLANS SHOWS MSD.
 FBC 106.1.2
  
 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NO DETAIL SUBMITTED FOR CONNECTION
 OR HOW OC DEVICES WILL BE WIRED WITH LIGHTING. POWER
 PACKS, LOW VOLTAGE ETC?
 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2.
 NEC 110.3
 FBC 106.1.2
  
 * ** IMPORTANT**
 ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE
 PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE
 SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED
 SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED
 SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW
 AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY
 OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS.
 PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE
 OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED
 FOR REFERENCE.
 THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND
 AVOID ANY DELAYS.
  
 ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR
 COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF
 THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY,
 NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO
 NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS
 REVIEWER.
  
  
 DEWEY PALMER
 ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II
 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT.
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 561-805-6717
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2007-01-14 Cont ID  
Sent By dpalmer Date 2007-01-14 Time 15:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By dpalmer Date 2007-01-14 Time 14:40 Sent To  
Notes
2007-01-14 15:19:39 
  
 **** UNSAT2ND REVIEW****
  
 ** PLEASE SEE SOME NOTES FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW ARE STILL
 IN QUESTION. PLEASE SEE SOME ARE NEW BASED ON THE
 REVISED PLANS SUBMITTED.
  
 PLEASE SEE THE COMMENTS BELOW ARE TAKEN DIRECTLY FROM
 THE PREVIOUS REVIEW WITH AN ANSWERS OF OK, NO OR
 OK/NO.
  
 OK, WILL SHOW THE PREVIOUS NOTE REMOVED.
 NO, WILL CONTAIN FURTHER EXPLANATION OF THE PREVIOUS
 NOTE.
 NO/OK, IS THAT PART OF THE COMMENT MAY NOT HAVE BEEN
 ADDRESSED FULLY AND WILL BE FOLLOWED BY FURTHER
 EXPLANATION.
  
 ** PLEASE SEE THAT ANY NEW NOTES WILL BE ADDED TO THE
 END OF THESE REVIEW NOTES AND WILL BE SEPARATED WITH
 *** NEW NOTES 2ND REVIEW ***
  
 1) NOTE:NO, PLEASE SEE THE RESPONSE MENTIONS THIS IS
 SUBMITTED AND IS LOCATE DON E00. PLEASE SEE ONLY A
 LIGHT POLE DETAIL WAS SUBMITTED. NO REFERENCE TO WIND
 LOADS, RATINGS, EPA OF FIXTURES ETC.
  
 ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE **
 PLEASE SUBMIT WIND LOADING CALCULATIONS FOR NEW LT
 POLES. IF THESE ARE NOT GOING TO BE UNDER THIS PERMIT,
 THEN THE CALCULATIONS MAY BE SUBMITTED WITH A SEPARATE
 PERMIT APPLICATION FEES AND PLANS AT A LATER DATE. FBC
 106.1.2
  
 2) NOTE:NO/OK. PLEASE SEE SOME OF THESE WERE ADDED
 HOWEVER PLEASE SEE PLANS ON E-2 WHICH INDICATES THE
 2003-2004 FBC. PLEASE SEE THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE. IT
 SEEMS TO HAVE BEEN A MISPRINT AS NO REFERENCE TO THE
 2003 NFPA-101 WAS MADE.
 PLEASE COMPLETE AND CORRELATE AS NOTED.
  
 ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE **
 PLEASE BE SURE THE PLANS REFLECT THE FOLLOWING CODES AT
 A MINIMUM.
 2002 NFPA-70, 2002 NFPA-72, 2003 NFPA-101.
 2004 FBC.
  
 3) NOTE:NO, PLEASE SEE NO TIMES OR DETAILS FOR THESE
 DEVICES WAS NOTED OR SHOWN. PLEASE SEE MAXIMUMS TIMES
 PERMITTED SHALL BE STATED. (30 MINS FOR OC TYPE DEVICE
 AND 4HRS ON ANY TIMER TYPE DEVICES).PLEASE ALSO SEE
 TIME DEVICE SHOWN ON PLANS, BUT NOT IN SYMBOL LEGEND
 ETC. PLEASE SEE NEW NOTES PERTAINING TO THE ENERGY
 CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED.
  
 ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE **
 PLEASE SEE AUTOMATIC LIGHTING CONTROLS FOR SHUTTING OFF
 OF LIGHTING IS REQUIRED PER FBC CHAPTER 13
 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2
  
 4) NOTE: OK. ? THIS WAS A COMMENT FOR BUILDING/FIRE
 REVIEW WHICH WAS ONLY NOTED.
  
 5) NOTE: OK.
  
 6) NOTE: OK, HOWEVER SEE NEW NOTES.
  
 7) NOTE: OK.
  
 8) NOTE: OK.
  
 9) NOTE:NO, PLEASE SEE THE RISER HAS REMOVED THIS
 HOWEVER PLEASE SEE THE MSB BOARD WHICH STILL INDICATES
 AND EQUIPMENT GROUNDING IN THE FEEDERS WHICH IS NOT
 PERMITTED 250.6, 250.24B. PLEASE KNOW THAT THESE ARE
 ACTUALLY SERVICE ENTRANCE CONDUCTORS. PLEASE SEE NEC
 ART 100 DEFINITIONS AS THESE ARE NOT FEEDERS.
  
 ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE** PLEASE SEE RISER SHOWS AN
 EQUIPMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTOR BEFORE THE FIRST MEANS OF
 DISCONNECT FROM FPL.
 PLEASE SEE 250.6, 250.24B AS "EQUIPMENT GROUNDING
 CONDUCTORS" ARE ONLY INSTALLED AFTER THE FIRST MEANS OF
 DISCONNECT.
  
  
 *** NEW NOTES ****
  
 10) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FBC CHAPTER 13. PLEASE SEE
 13-415.1.AB.1, AND 13-415.2 AS A METHOD C ENERGY
 CALCULATION WAS SUBMITTED WHICH COULD NOT BE USED BASED
 ON THE SCOPE OF WORK BEING DONE.
 PLEASE ALSO SEE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEED TO
 CORRELATE WITH THE ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR THE AMOUNT OF
 FIXTURES AND TYPES OF CONTROLS. PLEASE SEE THESE
 INDICATE 400 FIXTURES AND MANUAL ON/OFF CONTROLS.
 PLEASE SEE 13-415.2.ABC.1.3, 13-415.1.ABC.1.4.
  
 11) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MAIN ELECTRICAL ROOM WHICH
 INDICATES A METER BELOW A DISCONNECT WHICH WILL MOST
 LIKELY NOT MEET 110.26 FOR CLEAR SPACE AND EQUIPMENT
 BEING ABLE TO BE LOCATED 6INCHES OUT.
  
 12) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ADDRESS ON PLANS IS NOT CORRECT
 BASED ON THE LOCATION AND SCOPE OF WORK FOR SHELL AS
 SHOWN. PLEASE SEE BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS AS WELL AS
 THE COMMENTS FROM THE ADDRESSING REVIEWER.
  
 13) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE WORST CASE VOLTAGE DROP
 SCENARIOS FOR BRANCH CIRCUITS AND FEEDERS PER
 13-413.1ABC.1/13-413.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2.
  
  
 * ** IMPORTANT**
 ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE
 PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE
 SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED
 SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED
 SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW
 AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY
 OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS.
 PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE
 OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED
 FOR REFERENCE.
 THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND
 AVOID ANY DELAYS.
  
 ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR
 COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF
 THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY,
 NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO
 NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS
 REVIEWER.
  
  
 DEWEY PALMER
 ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW
 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT.
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 561-805-6717
 [email protected]
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2006-08-08 Cont ID  
Sent By dpalmer Date 2006-08-08 Time 17:44 Rev Time 0.00
Received By dpalmer Date 2006-08-07 Time 21:06 Sent To  
Notes
2006-08-08 00:00:00REVIEW IN PRORGESS
 ****UNSAT ****
  
 1) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT WIND LOADING
 CALCULATIONS FOR NEW LT POLES. IF THESE
 ARE NOT GOING TO BE UNDER THIS PERMIT,
 THEN THE CALCULATIONS MAY NE SUBMITTED
 WITH A SEPARATE PERMIT APPLICATION FEES
 AND PLANS AT A LATER DATE.
 FBC 106.1.2
  
 2) NOTE: PLEASE BE SURE THE PLANS
 REFLECT THE FOLLOWING CODES AT A
 MINIMUM.
 2002 NFPA-70, 2002 NFPA-72, 2003
 NFPA-101.
 2004 FBC.
  
 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE AUTOMATIC LIGHTING
 CONTROLS FOR SHUTTING OFF OF LIGHTING IS
 REQUIRED PER FBC CHAPTER 13
 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2
  
 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE BLDG REVIEW AND
 POSSIBLE FIRE REVIEW COMMENTS FOR DOOR
 SWING OF ADJACENT TENANT SPACE TO BAY
 #2.
 PLEASE SEE DOOR SWING MAY BE REQUIRED TO
 BE CHANGED IF NOT 180 DEGREE SWING. IF
 DOOR SWING CHANGES, SWITCH LOCATION MAY
 BE IN NEED OF ADJUSTMENT.
 THIS IS ONLY BEING NOTED AS THIS LOOKS
 AS THOUGH IT MAY HAVE AN AFFECT ON
 ELECTRICAL PLANS.
  
 5) NOTE: PLEASE PLACE NOTE ON PLANS
 WHICH STATES "PANIC HARDWARE" WILL BE
 REQUIREDON MAIN ELECTRICLA ROOM DOOR.
 110.26, 90.4
  
 6) NOTE: PLEASE CORRELATE RISER DIAGRAM
 WITH PANELS SHOWN ON ELECTRICAL ROOM
 LAYOUT. PLEASE SEE "H" AND H1" SHOWN,
 AND RISER SHOWS "H" AND "L".
 FBC 106.1.2
  
 7) NOTE: PLEASE INDICATE OR NOTE A
 "FLOATING NEUTRAL" FOR HOUSE METER AS
 THIS IS AFTER THE FIRST MEANS OF
 DISCONNECT.
 PLEASE SEE 250.6,250.24B.
  
 8) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE A NOTE FOR MSB
 AS THIS EQUIPMENT SHALL CONTAIN NOR MORE
 THAN 6 SPACES FOR MAINS. (THIS WOULD
 INCLUDE SP SPACES) . AS SHOWN IS THERE
 PERMANANT DEADFRONT WHICH PROHIBITS
 ADDTIONAL BRKRS?
 230.70
  
 9) NOTE: PLEASE SEE RISER SHOWS AN
 EQUIPMENT GROUNDING COUNDUCTOR BEFORE
 THE FIRST MEANS OF DISCONNECT FROM FPL.
 PLEASE SEE 250.6,250.24B AS "EQUIPMENT
 GROUNDING CONDUCTORS" ARE ONLY INSTALLED
 AFTER THE FIRST MEANS OF DISCONNECT.
  
 ** IMPORTANT**
 ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE
 PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE
 SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED
 SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED
 SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW
 AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY
 OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS.
 PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE
 OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED
 FOR REFERENCE.
 THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND
 AVOID ANY DELAYS.
  
 PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMATION FOR
 REVIEW. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS,
 PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CALL.
  
 DEWEY PALMER
 ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW
 CONSTUCTION SERVICES DEPT.
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 561-805-6717
 [email protected]
  
2006-08-07 00:00:00IN ELEC FOR REVIEW.
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2007-05-17 Cont ID  
Sent By rchokshi Date 2007-05-17 Time 13:55 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rchokshi Date 2007-05-17 Time 13:13 Sent To  
Notes
2007-05-17 13:55:08 
 FAILED FOR FOLLOWING REASONS:
  
 MR. STEVEN L. COHEN WROTE IN HIS LETTER OF MARCH 23, 07
 THAT PERMIT # 06070451 IS FOR INTERIOR ONLY WHILE
 PERMIT # 06070445 IS FOR FULL SITE PERMIT & ALL CIVIL
 ENGINEERING INFO IS IN THIS PERMIT 06070445. WE NEED
 FOLLOWING INFO FOR THIS PERMIT:
  
 1. PLEASE SHOW STANDARDS NOTES OF CITY OF WPB ON
 DRAWINGSFOR SIDEWALK WIDTH , ITS SLOPE, DRIVEWAY,
 PARKING, HANDICAP PARKING, PAINTING DETAILS FOR PARKING
 PER CITY CODES ETC.,, MUST MEET PER ADA,,ETC.,YOU CAN
 GET STANDARD NOTES OF CITY OFWPB IN A C.D. FROM 1000
 45TH STREET. ENG DEPT.WE SHOULD HAVE THOSE NOTES ON
 YOUR DRAWINGS.
 2. PLEASE SHOW ON DRAWINGSDUMPSTER & ITS ENCLOSURE
 DETAILS PER CITY OF WPB, &LOCATION ON DWG, LOCATION
 MUST BE ACCESSIBLE FOR PICKUP TRUCK.
 3. FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION, CENTER LINE OF ROAD ,
 SIDEWALK ELEVATION MUST MEET FLOOD ZONE AREA,5, 10,
 25, 100 YEAR FLOOD CRITERIA &FL BUILDING CODE, WHAT
 WORST CRITERIA YOU USED TO DETERMINE FIRST FLOOR
 ELEVATION?
 4. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF SFWMD PERMIT,, YOUR
 GEO-TECH REPORT DID NOT HAVE SOIL CONDUCTIVITY "K"? AND
 PLEASE SHOW CALCULATION FOR LENGTH OF EXFILTRATION
 TRENCH, & SAFETY FACTOR YOU USED IN CALCULATION OF
 EXFILTRATION LENGTH.
 5.PLEASE SHOW STORM WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS, WHAT
 CRITERIA YOU ASSUMEDFOR RUNOFF CAL.,, LIKE 1" OVER
 ENTIRE SITE OR2.5"CRITERIA, ETC?
 6. WHAT IS THE SITE AREA, YOU ARE DEVELOPING FOR THIS
 PROJECT ONLY ?ALSO, WHAT IS TOTAL PERVIOUS,& IMPERVIOUS
 AREA FOR THIS PROJECT.
 7. HOW YOU CONNECT TO THE STORM WATER PIPES IN YOUR
 SITE? ITS DETAILS.PLEASE SHOW ALL STORM WATER PIPES
 AROUND YOUR SITE SO, WE CANSEE THE BEST PIPE TO
 CONNECT WITH THE STORM WATERFROM ALL OTHER STORM
 WATER PIPES. PLEASE SHOW DETAIL OF THE CONTROL
 STRUCTURES WITH ELEVATIONS, NOTCHES, BLEEDING
 ELEVATION, ETC DID YOU USE EXFILTRATION TRENCH ? 8.
 POLLUTION PREVENTION DETAILS,CLOTHES USED FOR SILT
 ETC., PLANS SHOWING SILT FENCE AROUND THE SITE & CATCH
 BASINS.HEIGHT OF FENCE SHOULD BE HIGH ENOUGH PER FDEP
 TO STOP DUST & PARTICLES.
 9. WATER & SEWER PLANS MUST BE APPROVED FROM 45TH
 STREET (MANNY G.), UTILITY DEPT BEFORE WE APPROVED 10.
 ALSO PLEASE SHOW ALL CATCH BASINS NEAREST,AROUND YOUR
 SITE FOR STORM WATER DRAIN.
  
 PLEASE RESPOND EACH ITEM IN DETAIL TO EXPEDITE YOUR
 PERMITTING PROCESS
  
 RASIK CHOKSHI 805-6723
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2007-06-12 Cont ID  
Sent By mawillia Date 2007-06-12 Time 11:55 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mawillia Date 2007-06-12 Time 11:18 Sent To  
Notes
2007-06-12 11:54:21*****UNSAT*****
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS FROM THE PREVIOUS FIRE PLAN
 REVIEWS STILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED:
  
  
 1.NFPA 101 (2003 EDITION) SHALL BE REFERENCED.ADD
 TO CODE ANALYSIS, PLAN SHEET A1.1
  
 3.IN REFERENCE TO HANDRAILS, NOTE ONLY EXCEPTION SEC.
 7.2.2.4.1.5 ADD TO APPROPIATE PLAN SHEET
  
 6.FIRE ALARM TO BE U.L. CERTIFIED FOR CENTRAL STATION
 SERVICE.ADD TO FIRE ALARM SHEET(S)
  
  
 TO EXPEDITE THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS, INCLUDE A RESPONSE
 LETTER INDICATING HOW/WHERE EACH ITEM WAS ADDRESSED
  
  
 CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS
 FIRE PLAN REVIEW
 561-805-6722
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2007-02-15 Cont ID  
Sent By mwennerg Date 2007-02-15 Time 11:15 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mwennerg Date 2007-02-15 Time 11:15 Sent To  
Notes
2007-02-15 11:24:47***PROVISO***
  
 PLANS TO BE STAMPED WHEN NOTES ARE ADDED TO SHEETS
  
 1) PLEASE ADD NOTE TO CODE ANALYSIS.
  
 2) OK
  
 3) OK PLEASE NOTE THAT NFPA 101, SECTION 7.2.2.4.1
 SHALL BE COMPLIED WITH. NOTE ONLY EXCEPTION, SEC.
 7.2.2.4.1.5.
  
 4) OK
  
 5) OK
  
 6) PLEASE ADD NOTE TO FA SHEETS.
  
 7) OK
  
 8) OK
  
 9) OK
  
  
 MIKE WENNERGREN, ASSISTANT FIRE MARSHAL
 FIRE PLAN REVIEW
 (561) 805-6722 OR 804-4756
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2006-10-10 Cont ID  
Sent By mwennerg Date 2006-10-10 Time 13:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mwennerg Date 2006-10-10 Time 13:28 Sent To  
Notes
2006-10-10 13:34:24***DENIED***
  
 1) LIFE SAFETY SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 101, 2003
 EDITION.
  
 2) CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATION AND DEMOLITION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241.
  
 3) HANDRAILS ARE REQUIRED ON BOTH SIDES OF STAIRS AND
 RAMPS.
  
 4) ADDRESSES ARE REQUIRED ON BUILDINGS AND SHALL BE A
 MINIMUM OF 6" IN HEIGHT, 1" WIDE AND CONTRASTING TO THE
 BACKGROUND.
  
 5) SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS AND PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR
 FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM REMODEL.
  
 6) FIRE ALARM TO BE UL CERTIFIED FOR CENTRAL STATION
 SERVICE.
  
 7) EXIT DOORS SHALL SWING IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL
 WHEN SERVINGS AREAS OF OCCUPANT LOAD GREATER THAN 50.
  
 8) EMERGENCY ACCESS TO BUILDINGS SHALL BE MAINTAINED
 PRIOR TO, DURING AND AFTER CONSTRUCTION.
  
 9) 2A-10B,C RATED FIRE EXTINGUISHERS ARE REQUIRED AND
 SHALL BE MOUNTED AT DISTANCES NOT TO EXCEED 75'.
  
  
 MIKE WENNERGREN, ASSISTANT FIRE MARSHAL
 FIRE PLAN REVIEW (561) 805-6722
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2007-04-17 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2007-04-17 Time 09:57 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2007-04-17 Time 09:53 Sent To  
Notes
2007-04-17 09:53:25TO "COMM" BD#37
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2006-12-07 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2006-12-07 Time 16:06 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2006-12-07 Time 16:06 Sent To  
Notes
2007-01-11 08:30:05TO "COMM" BD#59
2006-12-07 16:06:54WAITING FOR "COMM" BD
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2006-10-19 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2006-10-19 Time 16:04 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2006-07-11 Time 14:58 Sent To  
Notes
2006-07-27 00:00:00TO "COMM' BD#56
2006-07-11 00:00:00WAITING FOR "COMM" BD
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2007-04-26 Cont ID  
Sent By tgordon Date 2007-04-26 Time 10:56 Rev Time 0.30
Received By tgordon Date 2007-04-26 Time 10:56 Sent To  
Notes
2007-04-26 11:12:57*** DENIED ***
 1) THE FIRM'S LICENSE FOR STEVEN L. COHEN AND
 ASSOCIATES, P.A. HAS EXPIRED ON 2-28-2005 AND IS NOW
 NULL AND VOID, PLEASE CORRECT.
  
 2) ENGINEERING DESIGN ASSOCIATES, INC. CERTIFICATE OF
 AUTHORIZATION EXPIRED 2-28-2007, PLEASE CORRECT.
  
 *** FAC 61G1-16.004 TITLE BLOCK.
 A TITLE BLOCK MUST APPEAR ON ALL ARCHITECTURAL OR
 INTERIOR DESIGN DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATION
 IDENTIFICATION SHEETS. THE TITLE BLOCK MUST, AT A
 MINIMUM, CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
 (1) FIRM NAME, ADDRESS, AND TELEPHONE NUMBER.
 (2) FIRM LICENSE NUMBER. (NULL AND VOID).
 (3) NAME OR IDENTIFICATION OF PROJECT. ("JOB ADDRESS"
 SEE CITY WPB AMEND. 106.1.1).
 (4) DATE PREPARED.
 (5) A SPACE FOR THE SIGNATURE AND DATED SEAL.
 (6) A SPACE FOR THE PRINTED NAME OF THE PERSON SEALING
 THE DOCUMENT.
  
 *** FAC 61G15-23.002 (2)A TITLE BLOCK ON EACH SHEET
 CONTAINING THE PRINTED NAME, ADDRESS, AND LICENSE
 NUMBER OF THE ENGINEER OR IF APPLICABLE, THE NAME AND
 LICENSE NUMBER OF THE ENGINEER, AND THE NAME, ADDRESS
 AND CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER OF THE
 ENGINEERING BUSINESS WILL SATISFY THIS REQUIREMENT.
  
 MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY;
 TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729.
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2007-01-16 Cont ID  
Sent By tgordon Date 2007-01-16 Time 08:34 Rev Time 1.00
Received By tgordon Date 2007-01-16 Time 08:34 Sent To  
Notes
2007-01-16 08:48:00*** DENIED ***
 1) SEE PAGE M-1 NOTE #2 AND 3 (ROOF CURBS, REFER TO M-2
 FOR DETAILS) PAGE M-2 SHOWS NO DETAIL FOR ROOF CURBS,
 PLEASE CORRECT.
  
 2) PLANS SHOW JOB ADDRESS AS 2015, OUR RECORDS SHOW THE
 JOB ADDRESS AS 2029, PLEASE CORRECT.
  
 3) ONE SET OF PLANS HAS AS MECHANICALPLANS PAGES M-1
 AND M-2 ONLY, THE OTHER SET HAS PAGES M-3 AND M-4 ONLY,
 PLEASE SUBMIT TWO COMPLETE AND IDENTICAL SETS OF
 PLANS.
  
 4) MECHANICAL PLANS PAGES M-1, M-2, M-3 , AND M-4 MAKE
 IT UNCERTAIN AS TO WHAT MECHANICAL (A/C) WORK IS TO BE
 DONE, IF NECESSARY STATE ON MECHANICAL PLANS WHAT
 MECHANICAL (A/C) WORK IS TO BE DONE.
  
 5) CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT
 CLARITY. PER 2004 FBC 106.1.1.
  
 MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY;
 TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729.
 .
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2006-09-19 Cont ID  
Sent By tgordon Date 2006-09-19 Time 15:36 Rev Time 0.45
Received By tgordon Date 2006-09-19 Time 15:36 Sent To  
Notes
2006-09-19 00:00:00*** DENIED ***
 1) ARCHITECT (STEVEN L. COHEN) LICENSE
 IS DELINQUENT AS OF 2-28-05.
  
 2) NEED TO SHOW ENGINEERED ANCHORING
 DETAILS FOR (A/C) CURB TO ROOF AND RTU
 TO CURB, TO WITHSTAND 140 MPH WINDS, PER
 2004 FBC 1609.
  
 3) PLEASE SUBMIT ENERGY CALCULATIONS,
 PER 2004 FBC 13-101.1.6 .
  
 MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY;
 TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729.
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2007-05-31 Cont ID  
Sent By kstevens Date 2007-05-31 Time 11:25 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kstevens Date 2007-05-31 Time 11:25 Sent To  
Notes
2007-05-31 11:43:41DENIED
 REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING
 FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1
 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
 FLORIDA STATUTES
  
 *******FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS:
  
 1. ALL ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS. THE CERTIFICATE OF
 AUTHORIZATION NUMBER, (BUSINESS NUMBER), IS SHOWN AS
 DELINQUENT STATUS FOR THE ARCHITECTURAL BUSINESS. SEE
 ATTACHED SHEET. FAC 61G1-16.004(1) & FS 481.219.
 ******RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE CERTIFICATE OF
 AUTHORIZATION NUMBER IS STILL IN DELINQUENCY. THE AA
 NUMBER SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED SHEET IS REQUIRED. COMMENT
 NOT ADDRESSED.
 ** ** ** **NO RESPONSE, NOT ADDRESSED
  
 2. OK
  
 3. SHT A2.2 SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR PRIMARY AND
 SECONDARY ROOF DRAINS PER SECTIONS 1106 & 1107 WITH ALL
 SUBSECTIONS. THIS IS FOR THE NEW ROOFS AND THE EXISTING
 ROOFS THAT HAVE ADDITIONAL ROOF AREA OR VERTICAL
 CONTRIBUTION ADDED TO TOTAL AREA TO BE DRAINED.
 CALCULATIONS SHALL SHOW THE ROOF AREA TO BE DRAINED TO
 EACH PRIMARY DRAIN, ALONG WITH 1/2 AREA OF ALL VERTICAL
 WALLS, INCLUDING PARAPETS, AS WELL AS ANY AREA OF A
 ROOF THAT DRAINS ONTO THE ROOF FROM ABOVE. INDICATE NEW
 ROOF AREA ADDED, AS THE "NEW ROOF" MAY JUST BE A NEW
 ROOF FOR EXISTING AREA AND SOME AREAS OF THE "NEW ROOF
 AREA" ARE NOT CLEAR. SECTION 106.1.1. ******RESPONSE
 NOTED, BUT THERE ARE 4 ROOF AREAS ON THE UPPER ROOF, &
 1 LOWER ROOF AREA ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING.
 EACH AREA HAS A DIFFERENT TOTAL AREA TO BE DRAINED.
 PLEASE SUBMIT THE CALCULATIONS FOR EACH AREA AND
 IDENTIFY EACH AREA, (EXAMPLE AREA 1, 2, 3 ETC. OR AREA
 A, B, C ETC.). DRAINS SHALL BE SIZED FOR THE SQUARE
 FOOTAGE DRAINED IN EACH AREA, NOT 1/4TH OF THE TOTAL
 SQUARE FOOTAGE DRAINED.--A SECONDARY ROOF DRAIN IS
 REQUIRED IN THE AREA BETWEEN THE EXISTING SPACES.
 SECTION 1107.2.
 ** ** ** ** RESPONSE NOTED, NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 4. OK
 5. OK
 6. OK
 7. OK
  
 REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS
 (561) 805-6721
 FAX (561) 805-6731
 E-MAIL [email protected]
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2007-02-01 Cont ID  
Sent By kstevens Date 2007-02-01 Time 09:55 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kstevens Date 2007-02-01 Time 09:55 Sent To  
Notes
2007-02-01 10:25:20DENIED
 REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING
 FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1
 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
 FLORIDA STATUTES
  
 1. ALL ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS. THE CERTIFICATE OF
 AUTHORIZATION NUMBER, (BUSINESS NUMBER), IS SHOWN AS
 DELINQUENT STATUS FOR THE ARCHITECTURAL BUSINESS. SEE
 ATTACHED SHEET. FAC 61G1-16.004(1) & FS 481.219.
 ******RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE CERTIFICATE OF
 AUTHORIZATION NUMBER IS STILL IN DELINQUENCY. THE AA
 NUMBER SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED SHEET IS REQUIRED. COMMENT
 NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 2. OK
  
 3. SHT A2.2 SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR PRIMARY AND
 SECONDARY ROOF DRAINS PER SECTIONS 1106 & 1107 WITH ALL
 SUBSECTIONS. THIS IS FOR THE NEW ROOFS AND THE EXISTING
 ROOFS THAT HAVE ADDITIONAL ROOF AREA OR VERTICAL
 CONTRIBUTION ADDED TO TOTAL AREA TO BE DRAINED.
 CALCULATIONS SHALL SHOW THE ROOF AREA TO BE DRAINED TO
 EACH PRIMARY DRAIN, ALONG WITH 1/2 AREA OF ALL VERTICAL
 WALLS, INCLUDING PARAPETS, AS WELL AS ANY AREA OF A
 ROOF THAT DRAINS ONTO THE ROOF FROM ABOVE. INDICATE NEW
 ROOF AREA ADDED, AS THE "NEW ROOF" MAY JUST BE A NEW
 ROOF FOR EXISTING AREA AND SOME AREAS OF THE "NEW ROOF
 AREA" ARE NOT CLEAR. SECTION 106.1.1. ******RESPONSE
 NOTED, BUT THERE ARE 4 ROOF AREAS ON THE UPPER ROOF, &
 1 LOWER ROOF AREA ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING.
 EACH AREA HAS A DIFFERENT TOTAL AREA TO BE DRAINED.
 PLEASE SUBMIT THE CALCULATIONS FOR EACH AREA AND
 IDENTIFY EACH AREA, (EXAMPLE AREA 1, 2, 3 ETC. OR AREA
 A, B, C ETC.). DRAINS SHALL BE SIZED FOR THE SQUARE
 FOOTAGE DRAINED IN EACH AREA, NOT 1/4TH OF THE TOTAL
 SQUARE FOOTAGE DRAINED.--A SECONDARY ROOF DRAIN IS
 REQUIRED IN THE AREA BETWEEN THE EXISTING SPACES.
 SECTION 1107.2.
  
 4. OK
 5. OK
 6. OK
 7. OK
  
 REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS
 (561) 805-6721
 FAX (561) 805-6731
 E-MAIL [email protected]
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2006-10-13 Cont ID  
Sent By kstevens Date 2006-10-13 Time 07:31 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kstevens Date 2006-10-12 Time 14:25 Sent To  
Notes
2006-10-13 07:50:45DENIED
 REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING
 FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1
 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
 FLORIDA STATUTES
  
 1. ALL ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS. THE CERTIFICATE OF
 AUTHORIZATION NUMBER, (BUSINESS NUMBER), IS SHOWN AS
 DELINQUENT STATUS FOR THE ARCHITECTURAL BUSINESS. SEE
 ATTACHED SHEET. FAC 61G1-16.004(1) & FS 481.219.
  
 2. SHT A1.1.4 IN THE REMOVAL OF ANY PART OF A SANITARY
 SYSTEM, DEAD ENDS ARE PROHIBITED. SECTION 704.5. ALL
 CAPPED PIPES SHALL NOT BE COVERED PRIOR TO INSPECTION.
  
 3. SHT A2.2 SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR PRIMARY AND
 SECONDARY ROOF DRAINS PER SECTIONS 1106 & 1107 WITH ALL
 SUBSECTIONS. THIS IS FOR THE NEW ROOFS AND THE EXISTING
 ROOFS THAT HAVE ADDITIONAL ROOF AREA OR VERTICAL
 CONTRIBUTION ADDED TO TOTAL AREA TO BE DRAINED.
 CALCULATIONS SHALL SHOW THE ROOF AREA TO BE DRAINED TO
 EACH PRIMARY DRAIN, ALONG WITH 1/2 AREA OF ALL VERTICAL
 WALLS, INCLUDING PARAPETS, AS WELL AS ANY AREA OF A
 ROOF THAT DRAINS ONTO THE ROOF FROM ABOVE. INDICATE NEW
 ROOF AREA ADDED, AS THE "NEW ROOF" MAY JUST BE A NEW
 ROOF FOR EXISTING AREA AND SOME AREAS OF THE "NEW ROOF
 AREA" ARE NOT CLEAR. SECTION 106.1.1.
  
 4. SHT A2.2 EXISTING SCUPPER LOCATED AT THE S.E. CORNER
 OF THE EXISTING BAY 2 ROOF IS NOT APPROVED FOR
 EMERGENCY OVERFLOW FOR THAT ROOF DRAIN, NOR FOR THE NEW
 ROOF DRAIN COVERING THE WALKWAY EAST OF EXISTING BAY 2.
 THE DISCHARGE SHALL BE IN A LOCATION WHICH WOULD
 NORMALLY BE OBSERVED BY THE BUILDING OCCUPANTS OR
 MAINTENANCE PERSONEL. SECTION 1107.2.
  
 5. SHT 5.2 INDICATE THE ELEVATION OF THE ROOF LEVEL
 ALONG WITH THE ELEVATION OF THE PARAPET WALLS TO VERIFY
 VERTICAL CONTRIBUTION ADDED TO THE ROOF AREAS IN THE
 CALCULATIONS. SECTION 106.1.1.
  
 6. SHT A8.3 DETAIL #10 "TYPICAL OVERFLOW SCUPPER
 DETAIL". INDICATE MEASUREMENT FROM THE ROOF TO THE FLOW
 LINE OF THE OVERFLOW SCUPPER PER SECTION 1503.4.3.
 INDICATE THE HEIGHT & WIDTH OF THE SCUPPERS TO BE SIZED
 PER SECTIONS 1101.7, 1107.3 AND TABLE 1106.7.
  
 7. IRRIGATION PLANS AND PERMIT REQUIRED. SECTION
 106.3.5.1.3(9).
  
 REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS
 (561) 805-6721
 FAX (561) 805-6731
 E-MAIL [email protected]
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2007-04-23 Cont ID  
Sent By kdfreema Date 2007-04-23 Time 14:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kdfreema Date 2007-04-23 Time 14:17 Sent To I
Notes
2007-04-23 14:24:30***FAILED***
  
 COMMENTS FROM REVIEW OF THE SECOND RESUB WERE NOT
 ADDRESSED. THESE COMMENTS WERE AS FOLLOWS:
  
 1. THE LANDSCAPE PLANS SUBMITTED DO NOT MATCH THE
 APPROVED PLANS. A MINOR DSI AMENDMENT WILL BE REQUIRED
 IF YOU WISH TO USED THE PLANS INCLUDED WITH THIS
 SUBMITTAL IN LIEU OF THE SET OF APPROVED PLANS.
  
 2. HAS THE ALLEY EASEMENT BEEN MODIFIED AS SHOWN ON THE
 PLANS? PLEASE INCLUDE THE RECORDED DOCUMENTS IN YOUR
 RESUBMITTAL.
  
 3. THE APPROVED SITE PLAN DOES NOT SHOW THE EAST ROW OF
 PARKING ON THE EAST SIDE OF COMPUSA. THOSE SPACES WERE
 TO BE REMOVED AS THEY DO NOT MEET THE MINIMUM STANDARDS
 FOUND IN THE ZONING CODE.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDED WRITTEN RESPONSES TO
 THE ABOVE COMMENTS.
  
 PLEASE CONTACT KELLY FREEMAN, PLANNER, AT 561-822-1435
 WITH ANY QUESTIONS.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2007-01-10 Cont ID  
Sent By kdfreema Date 2007-01-10 Time 15:39 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kdfreema Date 2007-01-10 Time 15:39 Sent To  
Notes
2007-01-10 15:40:00THE LANDSCAPE PLANS SUBMITTED DO NOT MATCH THE APPROVED
 PLANS. A MINOR DSI AMENDMENT WILL BE REQUIRED IF YOU
 WISH TO USE THE PLANS INCLUDED WITH THIS SUBMITTAL IN
 LIEU OF THE SET OF APPROVED PLANS.
  
 HAS THE ALLEY EASEMENT BEEN MODIFIED AS SHOWN ON THE
 PLANS? PLEASE INCLUDE THE RECORDED DOCUMENTS IN YOUR
 RESUBMITTAL.
  
 THE APPROVED SITE PLAN DOES NOT SHOW THE EAST ROW OF
 PARKING ON THE EAST SIDE OF COMPUSA. THOSE SPACES WERE
 TO BE REMOVED AS THEY DO NOT MEET THE MINIMUM STANDARDS
 AS FOUND IN THE ZONING CODE.
  
 PLEASE CONTACT KELLY FREEMAN, PLANNER, AT 561-822-1435
 WITH ANY QUESTIONS AND TO SCHEDULE AN APPOINTMENT TO
 FILL OUT THE MINOR DSI AMENDMENT APPLICATION.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2006-08-03 Cont ID  
Sent By kdfreema Date 2006-08-03 Time 16:04 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kdfreema Date 2007-01-10 Time 15:39 Sent To  
Notes
2006-08-04 00:00:00PLANS SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT REVIEW DIFFER
 FROM THOSE APPROVED BY THE CITY
 COMMISSION ON 12/5/05.
  
 THE CHANGES INCLUDE THE ADDITION AND
 RECONFIGURATION OF ENTRY LANDSCAPING,
 AND ALTERATION OF THE PARKING AREA TO
 THE NORTH OF THE LOADING AREA FOR BED
 BATH & BEYOND AND COMPUSA.
  
 THESE CHANGES WILL REQUIRE A MINOR DSI
 AMENDMENT.
  
 PLEASE CALL KELLY FREEMAN, PLANNER IF
 YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. (561) 822-1435.


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved