| Plan Review Stops For Permit 06061101 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-03-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
amorse |
Date |
2008-03-15 |
Time |
09:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
amorse |
Date |
2008-03-15 |
Time |
09:24 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-03-15 09:48:07 | | | | | | | DENIED | | | | | | 1)THE GLASS BLOCK MEETS THE DESIGN PRESSURES REQUIRED | | | BUT IS ONLY SMALL MISSILE IMPACT RATED. PER 1609.1.4 | | | FBC GLAZING WITHIN THE FIRST 30 FEET FROM GRADE ARE | | | REQUIRED TO MEET LARGE MISSILE IMPACT TEST REQUIREMENTS | | | THEREFORE THESE OPENINGS WILL REQUIRE AN IMPACT | | | PROTECTION SYSTEM. IF THIS PRODUCT IS USED SHUTTERS | | | WILL BE REQUIRED. PITTSBURGH CORNING HAS A GLASS BLOCK | | | SYSTEM THAT USES SILICONE RATHER THAN MORTAR THAT MEETS | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF SMALL AND LARGE MISSILE IMPACT | | | RATING. | | | | | | 2)THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH REQUIRES THE FLORIDA | | | STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL SHEETS WHEN AVAILABLE. THEY CAN | | | BE SEARCHED FOR ON WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG.WHEN | | | AVAILABLE AND NOT SUBMITTED APPLICATIONS WILL BE | | | DENIED.*******PLEASE SEE THE FL# WRITTEN AT TOP OF | | | MIAMI-DADE NOA, IF SILICONE SYSTEM IS USED FL # IS | | | 5357-R1******** | | | | | | 3)THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE | | | 9B-72 (PRODUCT APPROVALS) SHALL BE REVIEWED AND | | | APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO | | | SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL PER 106.3.3 FBC* | | | | | | 4)ORIGINAL DRAWINGS DO NOT SHOW GLASS BLOCK, REVISED | | | SHEET SHOWING LOCATION OF NEW GLASS BLOCK OPENING ARE | | | REQUIRED WITH THE PRODUCT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 5)THIS IS A REVISION TO THE PERMITTED SET OF DRAWING | | | NOT A SUBMITTAL AND AS SUCH REQUIRES A REVISION FEE. | | | | | | BLDG PLAN REVIEW | | | ADRIAN MORSE | | | 561-805-6716 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-10-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
amorse |
Date |
2007-10-20 |
Time |
07:23 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
amorse |
Date |
2007-10-20 |
Time |
07:23 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-10-20 07:24:03 | | | | | | | 2 SETS OF PLANS RESTAMPED |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-06-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
amorse |
Date |
2007-06-07 |
Time |
16:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
amorse |
Date |
2007-06-07 |
Time |
16:07 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-04-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
amorse |
Date |
2007-04-06 |
Time |
14:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
amorse |
Date |
2007-04-06 |
Time |
14:49 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-04-06 15:09:26 | | | | DENIED | | | | | | 1)PER 713.13(2) F.S. | | | IF THE IMPROVEMENT DESCRIBED IN THE NOC HAS NOT | | | COMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS OF RECORDING THE NOTICE IS | | | VOID. ****PLEASE SUBMIT A RERECORDED NOC.**** | | | | | | 2)SUBMIT ENGINEERED TRUSS DRAWINGS THAT | | | COMPLY WITH R802.10.1 FBC WITH PERMIT APPLICATION OR | | | BEFORE INSTALLATION THAT HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND | | | APPROVED BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD | | | ****2 COMPLETE COPIES THAT ARE SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE | | | TRUSS MANUFACTURERS ENGINEER ARE REQUIRED.**** | | | | | | 3)SUBMIT ENERGY CALC'S PER 13-101.2.2 | | | FBC. BE SURE THAT THEY ARE SIGNED AND | | | DATED BY PREPARER AND OWNER/AGENT PRIOR | | | TO SUBMITTAL. ****ONLY ONE COPY WAS SUBMITTED AND IT | | | WAS NOT DATED.**** | | | | | | 4)THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED FOR THE | | | PRODUCT APPROVALS | | | | | | A) CHOOSE THE TYPE OF GAF SHINGLE THAT WILL BE USED | | | FROM THE FLORIDA PAGE AND SUBMIT WITH THE CORRECT NOA | | | B) CHOOSE THE TYPE OF WINDOW THAT YOU WILL USE FROM THE | | | FLORIDA PAGES AND SUBMIT WITH THE ACCOMPANYING NOA C) | | | TWO DIFFERENT PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED FOR | | | STORM PANELS PLEASE SUBMIT 2 COPIES OF THE PRODUCT YOU | | | WILL BE USING. | | | D) THE DOOR MANUFACTURER THAT WAS SUBMITTED DOES NOT | | | CARRY ANY APPROVED STATUS IN THE 2004 FLORIDA SYSTEM OR | | | ON THE MIAMI-DADE SITE. PLEASE SUBMIT 2 COPIES OF AN | | | APPROVED DOOR. | | | | | | BLDG PLAN REVIEW | | | ADRIAN MORSE | | | 561-805-6716 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-09-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
amorse |
Date |
2006-09-28 |
Time |
07:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
amorse |
Date |
2006-09-28 |
Time |
07:57 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-09-28 00:00:00 | | | | | | | DENIED | | | | | | PREVIOUS COMMENTS WERE NOT ADDRESSED | | | | | | 1) BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY | | | BE ISSUED, IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO | | | PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL PERMIT | | | SETS OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT | | | OFFICE, AND A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT | | | ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | PLEASE CALL (561) 233-5025 FOR MORE | | | INFORMATION. PLEASE MAKE CORRECTIONS TO | | | DRAWINGS BEFORE SUBMITTING TO COUNTY FOR | | | IMPACT FEES & STAMP | | | | | | ***STILL HAS NO IMPACT FEE STAMP AND | | | COPY OF RECEIPT**** | | | | | | 3) PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF SURVEY | | | | | | *** SURVEY WAS PROVIDED BUT THE PROPOSED | | | ADDITION WAS NOT INDICATED ON THE | | | SURVEY*** | | | | | | 4) PROVIDE 2 OR MORE SETS OF | | | CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS WITH PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PER 106.1 (2 COPIES OF | | | DRAWINGS AND PRODUCT APPROVALS) | | | | | | ***ONE OLD SET OF DRAWINGS AND ONE NEW | | | SET WERE SUBMITTED 2 COPIES OF THE NEW | | | DRAWINGS ARE REQUIRED*** | | | | | | 5) THE PERMIT APPLICATION SHALL INCLUDE | | | TWO COPIES OF EACH PRODUCT APPROVAL THAT | | | IS RELEVANT PER 9B-72. THESE SHOULD | | | INCLUDE THE FLORIDA STATE APPROVAL COVER | | | PAGES, AND THE PRODUCT NOA THAT LISTS | | | THE SYSTEM COMPONENTS/ FASTENER LIST | | | PAGES, THE PAGES WITH THE CHOSEN | | | ASSEMBLY/ SYSTEM TO BE USED AND THE | | | GENERAL LIMITATIONS PAGE. ALL CAN BE | | | FOUND ON WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG | | | (PRODUCT APPROVALS REQUIRED FOR ROOFING, | | | WINDOW, DOOR) | | | | | | ***ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE INCOMPLETE | | | AND MANY DO NOT HAVE THE REQUIRED | | | INSTALLATION DOCUMENTS WITH THEM*** | | | | | | 6) THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY | | | DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND | | | APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF | | | RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR | | | JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL PER 106.3.3 FBC* | | | | | | ***DESIGN PROFESSIONAL HAS NOT REVIEWED | | | AND APPROVED THE PRODUCT APPROVALS*** | | | | | | 7) SUBMIT ENGINEERED TRUSS DRAWINGS THAT | | | COMPLY WITH R802.10.1 FBC WITH PERMIT | | | APPLICATION OR BEFORE INSTALLATION | | | | | | 9) SUBMIT ENERGY CALC'S PER 13-101.2.2 | | | FBC. BE SURE THAT THEY ARE SIGNED AND | | | DATED BY PREPARER AND OWNER/AGENT PRIOR | | | TO SUBMITTAL. NOTE THAT THERE ARE NO | | | MECHANICAL DRAWINGS SUBMITTED | | | | | | ***ENERGY CALC'S ARE NOT SIGNED BY THE | | | OWNER/AGENT*** | | | | | | | | | BLDG PLAN REVIEW | | | ADRIAN MORSE | | | 561-805-6716 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-08-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
amorse |
Date |
2006-08-14 |
Time |
13:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
amorse |
Date |
2006-08-14 |
Time |
13:16 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-08-14 00:00:00 | | | | | | | DENIED | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS WERE | | | NOT ADDRESSED | | | | | | 1) BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY | | | BE ISSUED, IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO | | | PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL PERMIT | | | SETS OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT | | | OFFICE, AND A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT | | | ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | PLEASE CALL (561) 233-5025 FOR MORE | | | INFORMATION. PLEASE MAKE CORRECTIONS TO | | | DRAWINGS BEFORE SUBMITTING TO COUNTY FOR | | | IMPACT FEES & STAMP | | | | | | 2) THE STATE OF FLORIDA REQUIRES | | | COLLECTION OF A RADON SURCHARGE ON ALL | | | NEW CONSTRUCTION COMPUTED ON UNDER ROOF | | | FLOOR SPACE PER 10D-91 FAC. THESE FEES | | | WILL BE ADDED TO THE PERMIT APPLICATION | | | FEES | | | | | | 3) PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF SURVEY | | | | | | 4) PROVIDE 2 OR MORE SETS OF | | | CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS WITH PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PER 106.1 (2 COPIES OF | | | DRAWINGS AND PRODUCT APPROVALS) | | | | | | 5) THE PERMIT APPLICATION SHALL INCLUDE | | | TWO COPIES OF EACH PRODUCT APPROVAL THAT | | | IS RELEVANT PER 9B-72. THESE SHOULD | | | INCLUDE THE FLORIDA STATE APPROVAL COVER | | | PAGES, AND THE PRODUCT NOA THAT LISTS | | | THE SYSTEM COMPONENTS/ FASTENER LIST | | | PAGES, THE PAGES WITH THE CHOSEN | | | ASSEMBLY/ SYSTEM TO BE USED AND THE | | | GENERAL LIMITATIONS PAGE. ALL CAN BE | | | FOUND ON WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG | | | (PRODUCT APPROVALS REQUIRED FOR ROOFING, | | | WINDOW, DOOR) | | | | | | 6) THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY | | | DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND | | | APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF | | | RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR | | | JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL PER 106.3.3 FBC* | | | | | | 7) SUBMIT ENGINEERED TRUSS DRAWINGS THAT | | | COMPLY WITH R802.10.1 FBC WITH PERMIT | | | APPLICATION OR BEFORE INSTALLATION | | | | | | 8) DESIGN PARAMATER LETTER HAS WHITE | | | OUT, THIS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. PLEASE | | | REPRINT WITH CORRECTIONS AND SUBMIT 2 | | | COPIES (ONE WITH EACH SET OF DRAWINGS) | | | OR ADD TO NEW DRAWINGS | | | | | | 9) SUBMIT ENERGY CALC'S PER 13-101.2.2 | | | FBC. BE SURE THAT THEY ARE SIGNED AND | | | DATED BY PREPARER AND OWNER/AGENT PRIOR | | | TO SUBMITTAL. NOTE THAT THERE ARE NO | | | MECHANICAL DRAWINGS SUBMITTED | | | | | | 10) DRAWINGS DO NOT ADEQUATELY SHOW THE | | | FOLLOWING, WINDOW SILL DETAIL, CEILING | | | INSULATION VALUE, MEAN ROOF HEIGHT, TOP | | | OF BEAM ELEVATION, FIN. FLOOR ELEVATION | | | | | | 11) PROVIDE ATTIC ACCESS ON DRAWINGS | | | PER R807.1 | | | | | | | | | BLDG PLAN REVIEW | | | ADRIAN MORSE | | | 561-805-6716 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-07-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
amorse |
Date |
2006-07-05 |
Time |
07:16 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
amorse |
Date |
2006-07-05 |
Time |
07:16 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-07-05 00:00:00 | | | | | | | DENIED | | | | | | 1) BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY | | | BE ISSUED, IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO | | | PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL PERMIT | | | SETS OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT | | | OFFICE, AND A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT | | | ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | PLEASE CALL (561) 233-5025 FOR MORE | | | INFORMATION. PLEASE MAKE CORRECTIONS TO | | | DRAWINGS BEFORE SUBMITTING TO COUNTY FOR | | | IMPACT FEES & STAMP | | | | | | 2) THE STATE OF FLORIDA REQUIRES | | | COLLECTION OF A RADON SURCHARGE ON ALL | | | NEW CONSTRUCTION COMPUTED ON UNDER ROOF | | | FLOOR SPACE PER 10D-91 FAC | | | | | | 3) PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF SURVEY | | | | | | 4) PROVIDE 2 OR MORE SETS OF | | | CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS WITH PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PER 106.1 | | | | | | 5) THE PERMIT APPLICATION SHALL INCLUDE | | | TWO COPIES OF EACH PRODUCT APPROVAL THAT | | | | | | IS RELEVANT PER 9B-72. THESE SHOULD | | | INCLUDE THE FLORIDA STATE APPROVAL COVER | | | PAGES, AND THE PRODUCT NOA THAT LISTS | | | THE SYSTEM COMPONENTS/ FASTENER LIST | | | PAGES, THE PAGES WITH THE CHOSEN | | | ASSEMBLY/ SYSTEM TO BE USED AND THE | | | GENERAL LIMITATIONS PAGE. ALL CAN BE | | | FOUND ON WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG | | | | | | 6) THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY | | | DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND | | | APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF | | | RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR | | | JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL PER 106.3.3 FBC* | | | | | | 7) SUBMIT ENGINEERED TRUSS DRAWINGS THAT | | | COMPLY WITH R802.10.1 FBC WITH PERMIT | | | APPLICATION OR BEFORE INSTALLATION | | | | | | 8) DESIGN PARAMATER LETTER HAS WHITE | | | OUT, THIS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. PLEASE | | | REPRINT WITH CORRECTIONS AND SUBMIT 2 | | | COPIES (ONE WITH EACH SET OF DRAWINGS) | | | OR ADD TO NEW DRAWINGS | | | | | | 9) SUBMIT ENERGY CALC'S PER 13-101.2.2 | | | FBC. BE SURE THAT THEY ARE SIGNED AND | | | DATED BY PREPARER AND OWNER/AGENT PRIOR | | | TO SUBMITTAL. NOTE THAT THERE ARE NO | | | MECHANICAL DRAWINGS SUBMITTED | | | | | | 10) DRAWINGS DO NOT ADEQUATELY SHOW THE | | | FOLLOWING, WINDOW SILL DETAIL, CEILING | | | INSULATION VALUE, MEAN ROOF HEIGHT, TOP | | | OF BEAM ELEVATION, FIN. FLOOR ELEVATION | | | | | | 11) PROVIDE ATTIC ACCESSON DRAWINGS | | | PER R807.1 | | | | | | 12) PROVIDE EMERGENCY EGRESS PER R310.1 | | | - R310.1.4 FBC: MIN. NET CLEAR OPENING | | | OF 5 SQ.FT. ON GRADE FLOOR. MIN. NET | | | CLEAR OPENING ALL OTHER FLOORS OF 5.7 | | | SQ.FT. IN BOTH CASES THE MIN.NET CLEAR | | | HEIGHT SHALL BE 24" AND THE NET CLEAR | | | WIDTH SHALL BE 20" NOTE THAT NEW WINDOW | | | IN MASTER BEDROOM DOES NOT MEET THESE | | | REQUIREMENTS | | | | | | 13) A RECORDED COPY OF THE NOTICE OF | | | COMMENCEMENT IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO | | | A PERMIT BEING ISSUED | | | | | | BLDG PLAN REVIEW | | | ADRIAN MORSE | | | 561-805-6716 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-02-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-02-27 |
Time |
15:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-02-27 |
Time |
14:46 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-02-27 15:45:28 | REDLINED 2002 NEC |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-09-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2006-09-19 |
Time |
08:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2006-09-19 |
Time |
07:43 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-09-19 00:00:00 | ********** UNSAT 3RD REVIEW ********* | | | | | | ** PLEASE SEE SOME NOTES FROM PREVIOUS | | | TWO REVIEWS ARE STILL IN NEED OF | | | ADDRESSING. | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE DEDICATED BATH(S) RM | | | CIRCUIT(S) ARE STILL BEING SHOWN A 220V | | | ON 2-POLE BREAKERS. | | | 210.52D,210.11C3 | | | BOTH PREVIOUS REVIEWS | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE SMALL APPLIACNE | | | CIRCUIT IS BEING SHOWN ON A 220V -2-POLE | | | BRKR? | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ARC FAULT PROTECTION | | | IS STILL BEING SHOWN FOR RECEPTS ONLY AS | | | NOTED FROM THE 1999 NEC. BOTH PREVIOUS | | | REVIEWS. | | | PLEASE SEE 210.12 2002 NEC> | | | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ONLY SET OFNEW | | | PLANS ARE BEING SUBMITTED. | | | PLEASE SEE ONLY ONE NEW AND ONE OLD WAS | | | SUBMITTED. | | | PLEASE SEE FBC ADMIN SECT 106.1 AS 2 MIN | | | ARE REQUIRED ALONG WITH ONE SET OF THE | | | OLD/VOIDED PLANS. | | | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTE WHICH | | | MENTIONED FS 553.80(2)(B) WITH RESPECT | | | TO REPEAT COMMENTS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. | | | PLEASE KNOW, A 4X FEE HAS NOW BEEN ADDED | | | FOR REPEAT COMMENTS. THE FEE FO $960.00 | | | IS NOW DUE BEFORE RESUBMITTING PLANS. | | | PLEASE ALSO KNOW THAT THE 2ND RESUB FEE | | | WAS NOT PAID WHEN PLANS WERE RESUBMITTED | | | FOR THIS REVIEW AND WAS NOW BEEN ADDED | | | AND IS ALSO OWED BEFORE RESUBMITTING | | | PLANS. | | | PLEASE SEE FS 553.80(2)(B), AS THIS | | | WOULD BE REQUIRED FOR EACH TIME IF PLANS | | | FAIL FOR ANY REPEAT COMMENTS. | | | | | | ** NEW NOTES ** | | | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SE PANEL SCHEDULE SHOWS | | | 50A OCP FOR THE 10KW HEAT ON AHU. PLEASE | | | VERIFY AS THE CODE IN 424.3B REQUIRES A | | | MIN OF 125% FOR OCP. | | | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PANEL SCHEDULE SHOWS | | | A DEDICATE CIRCUIT FOR OVERHEAD GARAGE | | | DOOR, HOWEVER NO GARAGE OR OVERHEAD DOOR | | | IS SHOWN ON PLANS??? | | | PLEASE VERIFY | | | 106.1.2 | | | | | | ** IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE | | | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE | | | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED | | | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW | | | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED | | | FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND | | | AVOID ANY DELAYS. | | | | | | PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMATION FOR | | | REVIEW. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS, | | | PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CALL. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-08-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2006-08-07 |
Time |
20:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2006-08-07 |
Time |
20:01 |
Sent To |
M |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-08-07 00:00:00 | ******* UNSAT2ND REVIEW ********* | | | | | | ** NEW NOTE** | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE SAME PLANS WERE | | | SUBMITTED BACK FOR REVIEW. PLEASE ALSO | | | SEE ONLY ONE SET WAS SUBMITTED. | | | FBC 106.1 | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FS 553.80(2)(B) WITH | | | RESPECT TO REPEAT COMMENTS FOR CODE | | | COMPLIANCE. | | | | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTES BELOW** | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PELASE SEE MISSIGN EGRESS LT | | | AND CONTROL AST REAR OF ADDTION. 210.70, | | | LS101 7.8 | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE BATH RM GFI RECEPT | | | SHALL BE WITHIN 3' OF THE EDGE OF THE | | | SINK, WITHOUT CROSSING OVER THE OTHER | | | SINK. THIS SHALL BE DONE BY MOVING THE | | | GFI OR ADDING ONE. | | | 210.52D | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE DEDICATED BATH | | | CIRCUIT IS SHOWN AS 220V/2-POLE??? | | | PLEASE SEE 210.11C3 | | | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 250.52,210.70 AS AN | | | ENTIRE RECEPT IS BEING SHOWN AS SWITCHED | | | IN BEDRM WHICH IS OK, HOWEVER AN | | | ADDITIONAL RECEPT WOULD BE REQUIRED TO | | | MEET 210.52 | | | IF THIS IS A 1/2 SW DEVICE, PLEASE | | | CHANGE. | | | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ONLY ONE SM APPL | | | CIRCUIT IS SHOWN, HOWEVER 3KW LOAD IS | | | BEING SHOWN ONTHIS ONE CIR. | | | PLEASE SEE 210.52B1,220.16,220.11C1 | | | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 210.8A AS THE RECEPT | | | LOCATED OUTSIDE REQUIRED BYE 210.52E, | | | SHOULD BE GFI. | | | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE INDICATE AND SHOW THE | | | LAYOUT OF THE REST OF THE DWELLING AS | | | SD'S ARE REQ'D INSIDE AND OUTSIDE ALL | | | EXISTING SLEEPING RMS. | | | R313, NFPA-72 11.5.1.1,11.8.3 | | | | | | 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PLANS INDICATE THE | | | REQ'D ARC FAULT FOR DEVICES FROM THE | | | 1999 NEC. PLEASE SEE 210.12B 2002, AS | | | ARC FAULT PROTECTION IS REQ'D FOR ALL | | | NEW OUTLETS IN BEDRMS. | | | PLEASE INDICATE THIS ON PANEL SCHEDULE, | | | NOT IN A NOTE. | | | 408.4 | | | | | | 9) NOTE: PLEASE INDICATE THE NEW CIRCUIT | | | ON PANEL SCHEDULE. 408.4. | | | THIS IS THE SAME PANEL SCHEDULE WHICH IS | | | BEING SUBMITTED FOR EVERY HOUSE BY THIS | | | DRAFTMANS/DESIGNER AND EACH HOUSE SHALL | | | BE SPECIFIC TO THAT DWELLING. | | | PLEASE REVISE. | | | | | | | | | ** IMPORTANT** | | | PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW | | | REVISED SHEETS INTO COMPLETE SETS FOR | | | REVIEW AND STAMPING. ONLY ONE COPY OF | | | THE OLD/VOIDED REMOVED SHEETS SHOULD BE | | | SUBMITTED WITH NEW SETS. | | | | | | | | | PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMATION FOR | | | REVIEW. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS, | | | PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CALL. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | CONSTUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-06-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2006-06-28 |
Time |
07:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2006-06-27 |
Time |
19:54 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-06-28 00:00:00 | ******* UNSAT ********* | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PELASE SEE MISSIGN EGRESS LT | | | AND CONTROL AST REAR OF ADDTION. 210.70, | | | LS101 7.8 | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE BATH RM GFI RECEPT | | | SHALL BE WITHIN 3' OF THE EDGE OF THE | | | SINK, WITHOUT CROSSING OVER THE OTHER | | | SINK. THIS SHALL BE DONE BY MOVING THE | | | GFI OR ADDING ONE. | | | 210.52D | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE DEDICATED BATH | | | CIRCUIT IS SHOWN AS 220V/2-POLE??? | | | PLEASE SEE 210.11C3 | | | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 250.52,210.70 AS AN | | | ENTIRE RECEPT IS BEING SHOWN AS SWITCHED | | | IN BEDRM WHICH IS OK, HOWEVER AN | | | ADDITIONAL RECEPT WOULD BE REQUIRED TO | | | MEET 210.52 | | | IF THIS IS A 1/2 SW DEVICE, PLEASE | | | CHANGE. | | | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ONLY ONE SM APPL | | | CIRCUIT IS SHOWN, HOWEVER 3KW LOAD IS | | | BEING SHOWN ONTHIS ONE CIR. | | | PLEASE SEE 210.52B1,220.16,220.11C1 | | | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 210.8A AS THE RECEPT | | | LOCATED OUTSIDE REQUIRED BYE 210.52E, | | | SHOULD BE GFI. | | | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE INDICATE AND SHOW THE | | | LAYOUT OF THE REST OF THE DWELLING AS | | | SD'S ARE REQ'D INSIDE AND OUTSIDE ALL | | | EXISTING SLEEPING RMS. | | | R313, NFPA-72 11.5.1.1,11.8.3 | | | | | | 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PLANS INDICATE THE | | | REQ'D ARC FAULT FOR DEVICES FROM THE | | | 1999 NEC. PLEASE SEE 210.12B 2002, AS | | | ARC FAULT PROTECTION IS REQ'D FOR ALL | | | NEW OUTLETS IN BEDRMS. | | | PLEASE INDICATE THIS ON PANEL SCHEDULE, | | | NOT IN A NOTE. | | | 408.4 | | | | | | 9) NOTE: PLEASE INDICATE THE NEW CIRCUIT | | | ON PANEL SCHEDULE. 408.4. | | | THIS IS THE SAME PANEL SCHEDULE WHICH IS | | | BEING SUBMITTED FOR EVERY HOUSE BY THIS | | | DRAFTMANS/DESIGNER AND EACH HOUSE SHALL | | | BE SPECIFIC TO THAT DWELLING. | | | PLEASE REVISE. | | | | | | | | | ** IMPORTANT** | | | PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW | | | REVISED SHEETS INTO COMPLETE SETS FOR | | | REVIEW AND STAMPING. ONLY ONE COPY OF | | | THE OLD/VOIDED REMOVED SHEETS SHOULD BE | | | SUBMITTED WITH NEW SETS. | | | | | | | | | PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMATION FOR | | | REVIEW. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS, | | | PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CALL. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | CONSTUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | 2006-06-27 00:00:00 | PLANS IN ELEC FOR REVIEW, WILL PROCEED | | | INTO "F" STATUES, REVIEW TO CONTINUE ON | | | 6/28 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
11 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-03-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-03-03 |
Time |
16:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-03-03 |
Time |
16:51 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-03-03 16:52:07 | TO "AMORSE" DESK/SUBMITTAL |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
10 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-10-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-10-17 |
Time |
10:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-10-17 |
Time |
10:34 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-10-17 10:34:32 | TO "AMORSE" DESK/RESTAMP |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
9 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-05-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-05-15 |
Time |
10:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-05-15 |
Time |
10:15 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-05-15 10:15:31 | TO "LMARTINEZ" DESK/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
8 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-02-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-02-26 |
Time |
09:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-02-26 |
Time |
09:08 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-02-26 09:09:08 | TO "DPALMER" DESK/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-02-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-02-16 |
Time |
11:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-02-16 |
Time |
11:43 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-02-16 11:43:42 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-09-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-09-18 |
Time |
09:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-09-18 |
Time |
09:59 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-09-18 00:00:00 | TO "DPALMER" DESK/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-09-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-09-09 |
Time |
14:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-09-09 |
Time |
14:25 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-09-09 00:00:00 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-08-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-08-07 |
Time |
14:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-08-07 |
Time |
14:31 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-08-07 00:00:00 | TO "DPALMER" DESK/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-08-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-08-01 |
Time |
13:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-08-01 |
Time |
13:45 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-08-01 00:00:00 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-06-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-06-27 |
Time |
11:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-06-27 |
Time |
11:00 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-06-27 00:00:00 | TO "E" BOX |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-07-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2006-07-05 |
Time |
08:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2006-06-21 |
Time |
10:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2006-06-21 00:00:00 | TO "Z" BOX |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-02-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-02-27 |
Time |
16:44 |
Rev Time |
0.20 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-02-27 |
Time |
16:44 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-02-27 16:49:38 | MECHANICAL PERMIT #06061103 HAS BEEN VOIDED AS NO | | | MECHANICAL WORK WILL BE DONE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-09-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2006-09-19 |
Time |
08:50 |
Rev Time |
0.30 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2006-09-19 |
Time |
08:50 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-09-19 00:00:00 | *** DENIED *** | | | 1) AS NOTED IN THE PAST TWO REVIEWS | | | 7-5-06 AND 8-8-06 NO MECHANICAL PLANS | | | VERE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW PLEASE SUBMIT | | | MECHANICAL PLANS FOR REVIEW. | | | | | | PER 2004 FBC CITY OF WPB AMEND. 106.3.5 | | | MINIMUM PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA FOR | | | BUILDINGS, 106.3.5.4 RESIDENTIAL #10 | | | MECHANICAL: ENERGY CALCULATIONS, | | | EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE, DUCT LAYOUT | | | SIZE/GRILL SIZE. | | | | | | 2) SEE ATTACHED NOTICE FS 553.80(2)(B) | | | REGARDING FOUR TIMES THE FEE. | | | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-08-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2006-08-08 |
Time |
08:32 |
Rev Time |
0.20 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2006-08-08 |
Time |
08:32 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-08-08 00:00:00 | *** DENIED *** | | | 1) AS NOTED IN LAST REVIEW 7-5-06. | | | NO MECHANICAL PLANS WERE SUBMITTED FOR | | | REVIEW. PLEASE SUBMIT MECHANICAL PLANS | | | FOR REVIEW, OR YOU MAY WISH TO VOID YOUR | | | MECHANICAL PERMIT NUMBER SO YOUR | | | BUILDING PLANS MAY BY-PASS A MECHANICAL | | | REVIEW. | | | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-07-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2006-07-05 |
Time |
08:15 |
Rev Time |
0.20 |
| Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2006-07-05 |
Time |
08:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2006-07-05 00:00:00 | *** DENIED *** | | | 1) NO MECHANICAL PLANS WERE SUBMITTED | | | FOR REVIEW. PLEASE SUBMIT MECHANICAL | | | PLANS FOR REVIEW, OR YOU MAY WISH TO | | | VOID YOUR MECHANICAL PERMIT NUMBER | | | 06061103 SO YOUR BUILDING PLANS MAY | | | BY-PASS A MECHANICAL REVIEW. | | | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-03-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mperson |
Date |
2007-03-01 |
Time |
11:02 |
Rev Time |
0.33 |
| Received By |
mperson |
Date |
2007-03-01 |
Time |
11:02 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-09-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2006-09-22 |
Time |
15:29 |
Rev Time |
0.33 |
| Received By |
mperson |
Date |
2006-09-22 |
Time |
16:05 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-09-22 00:00:00 | ******DENIED 3RD TIME****** | | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | | | | | 1. PER FBC-2004, CHAPTER 1, SECTION | | | 106.1, A MINIMUM OF TWO (2) SETS OF | | | PRINTS ARE REQUIRED FOR PLAN REVIEW. | | | NOTE: ONLY ONE SET OF NEW AND ONE SET OF | | | OLD PRINTS WERE SUBMITTED. | | | | | | 2. SEE ATTACHED NOTICE FS 553.80 (2) (B) | | | REGUARDING FOUR (4) TIMES THE FEE. | | | | | | END OF COMMENTS: | | | | | | REVIEW BY MIKE PERSON | | | (561) 805-6730 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | | UNDER SUPERVISION OF K.STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-08-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mperson |
Date |
2006-08-14 |
Time |
08:03 |
Rev Time |
0.33 |
| Received By |
mperson |
Date |
2006-08-14 |
Time |
08:02 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-08-14 00:00:00 | ******DENIED 2ND TIME****** | | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | | | | | 1. THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS STILL | | | REQUIRED BY PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW DUE TO | | | THE FACT THAT THE SAME PLANWAS | | | RESUBMITTED WITH NO CORRECTIONS. | | | 2. ONLY ONE PLAN WAS AGAIN RESUBMITTED, | | | NOTE: PER FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1, SECTION | | | 106.1, TWO (2) SETS OF PLANS REQUIRED. | | | 3. PLEASE SEE ATTACHED FLORIDA STATUTE | | | 533.80(2)(B) IN RESPECT WITH REPEAT | | | COMMENTS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. | | | **BELOW ARE REPEAT COMMENTS FROM 1ST | | | REVIEW** | | | 4.PER FBC-2004 SEC, 708.3.4 BASE OF | | | STACK: A CLEANOUT SHALL BE PROVIDED AT | | | THE BASE OF EACH WASTE OR SOIL STACK. | | | 5. PER FBC-2004 TABLE 906.1: THE MAXIMUM | | | DISTANCE OF A 2" TRAP WITH A 2" FIXTURE | | | DRAIN IS 6', A RELIEF VENT IS REQUIRED. | | | | | | **IN ORDER TO EXPIDITE PLAN REVIEW: WHEN | | | RESUBMITTING, PLEASE REPLACE ONLY SHEETS | | | WHICH HAVE CHANGED AND PROVIDE ONE COPY | | | OF ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS FOR REFERENCE | | | ONLY. NOTE: PLEASE SEE CORRECTED | | | ISOMETRIC SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM ON | | | SHEET 2 OF 4 IN RED INK FOR RE REFERENCE | | | FOR RESUBMITTAL. ONLY ONE CORRECTED | | | DRAWING IN RED INK FOR REFERENCE FOR | | | RESUBMITTAL. | | | | | | END OF COMMENTS: | | | | | | REVIEW BY MIKE PERSON | | | (561) 805-6730 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | | UNDER SUPERVISION OF K.STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-07-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mperson |
Date |
2006-07-03 |
Time |
09:54 |
Rev Time |
0.45 |
| Received By |
mperson |
Date |
2006-07-03 |
Time |
09:54 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-07-03 00:00:00 | ******DENIED****** | | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS REQUIRED | | | FOR PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW: | | | | | | 1. PER FBC-2004 SEC. 708.3.4 BASE OF | | | STACK: A CLEANOUT SHALL BE PROVIDED AT | | | THE BASE OF EACH WASTE OR SOIL STACK. | | | 2. PER FBC-2004 TABLE 906.1: THE MAXIMUM | | | DISTANCE OF A 2" TRAP WITH A 2" FIXTURE | | | DRAIN IS 6', A RELIEF VENT IS REQUIRED. | | | | | | **IN ORDER TO EXPIDITE PLAN REVIEW: WHEN | | | RESUBMITTING, PLEASE REPLACE ONLY SHEETS | | | WHICH HAVE CHANGED, AND PROVIDE ONE COPY | | | OF ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS FOR REFERENCE | | | ONLY. PLEASE SEE CORRECTED ISOMETRIC | | | SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM ON SHEET 2 OF 4 | | | IN RED INK FOR RFEERENCE FOR | | | RESUBMITTAL. | | | | | | END OF COMMENTS: | | | | | | REVIEW BY MIKE PERSON | | | (561) 805-6730 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | | UNDER SUPERVISION OF K.STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-02-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adavila |
Date |
2007-02-23 |
Time |
13:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adavila |
Date |
2007-02-23 |
Time |
12:36 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2007-02-23 13:35:18 | PER JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-09-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mmclean |
Date |
2006-09-14 |
Time |
13:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mmclean |
Date |
2006-09-14 |
Time |
13:32 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-09-14 00:00:00 | DENIED, | | | 1. MUST SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE | | | PROPOSED ADDITION ON THE TWO COPY OF | | | SURVEY WITH SETBACKS. | | | 2. THE SURVEY DOES NOT SHOW THE PROPOSED | | | WORK OR SETBACKS. | | | 3. TWO SET OF PLANS MUST BE SUBMITTED | | | WITH PERMIT APPLICATION (ONLY ONE | | | ORIGNIAL IS SUBMITTED IN PACKAGE). | | | | | | | | | MICHELLE MCLEAN | | | ZONING TECHNICIAN | | | 805-6720 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-08-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mmclean |
Date |
2006-08-05 |
Time |
09:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mmclean |
Date |
2006-08-05 |
Time |
09:08 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-08-05 00:00:00 | DENIED, 2ND REQUST. | | | 1. NEED TO PROVIDE TWO CURRENT COPY | | | SURVEY, SHOWING THE PROPOSED ADDITION | | | WITH SETBACK. | | | 2. TWO SET OF PLANS MUST BE SUBMITTED | | | WITH PERMIT APPLICATION (ONLY ONE WAS | | | SUBMITTED IN PACKAGE). | | | | | | | | | MICHELLE MCLEAN | | | ZONING TECHNICIAN | | | 805-6720 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-06-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mmclean |
Date |
2006-06-24 |
Time |
09:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mmclean |
Date |
2006-06-24 |
Time |
09:33 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-06-24 00:00:00 | DENIED, | | | 1. NEED TO PROVIDE TWO CURRENT COPY | | | SURVEY, SHOWING THE PROPOSED ADDITION | | | WITH SETBACK. | | | 2. TWO SET OF PLANS MUST BE SUBMITTED | | | WITH PERMIT APPLICATION (ONLY ONE WAS | | | SUBMITTED IN PACKAGE). | | | | | | | | | MICHELLE MCLEAN | | | ZONING TECHNICIAN | | | 805-6720 |
|
|