| Plan Review Stops For Permit 06051004 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-11-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mjacobs |
Date |
2006-11-03 |
Time |
18:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mjacobs |
Date |
2006-11-03 |
Time |
18:57 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-11-03 18:59:18 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT:06051004 | | | ADD:90145TH ST | | | CONT:BARON SIGN | | | TEL: (561)863-7446 | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | REVIEW2ND | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1) ANY HAND WRITTEN CHANGES TO THE DRAWINGS SHALL HAVE | | | THE SIGNATURE OF THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE | | | DRAWINGS NEXT TOTHE CHANGES OR NEW DRAWINGS SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED. | | | 104.2.1.3 THE BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | MAY SET STANDARDS THROUGH DEPARTMENTAL | | | POLICY STANDARDS FOR PLANS AND SPRCIFICA | | | TIONS. | | | | | | 2) HOWMANY SIGNS WILL BE INSTALL AT THIS LOCATION? | | | WHAT DOES THE YELLOW MARK ON THE SITE PLAN REPRESENTS? | | | IF THESE ARE THE LOCATION OF NEW SIGNS, PLEASE STATE | | | THIS INFORMATION CLEARLY ON THE APPLICATION. WILL THE | | | SIGNS BE DOUBLE FACED? | | | | | | 3)THE CLAIMED VALUATION ON THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS | | | LOW. FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES, VALUATION OF BUILDINGS | | | AND SYSTEMS SHALL BE THE TOTAL REPLACEMENT COST | | | EXCLUDING LAND VALUE. OUR VALUATION REFERENCE IS ICC | | | (BVD), MARSHALL-SWIFT AND MEANS COST ANALYSIS SERVICES | | | PER 108.3 FBC* | | | | | | NOTE:THE ZONING REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE ADDRESS BEFORE | | | A PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. | | | | | | MYRON JACOBS | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEWER | | | 805-6726 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-06-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mjacobs |
Date |
2006-06-28 |
Time |
18:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mjacobs |
Date |
2006-06-28 |
Time |
18:36 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-06-28 00:00:00 | | | | | | | 1) 2004 FL. BLD CODE 1603.1.4 THE | | | FOLLOWING INFORMATION RELATED TO WIND | | | SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION | | | DRAWINGS, | | | 1)- BASIC WIND SPEED, MPH | | | 2)- WIND IMPORTANCE FACTOR, & BUILDING | | | CATEGORY | | | 3)- WIND EXPOSURE | | | 4)- INTERNAL PRESSURE COEFFICIENT, | | | 5)- COMPONENTS & CLADDING, THE DESIGN | | | WIND PRESSURES IN TERMS OF PSF. | | | | | | MYRON JACOBS | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEWER | | | TEL:(561)805-6726 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-11-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2006-11-03 |
Time |
12:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2006-11-03 |
Time |
12:36 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-11-03 12:46:36 | ** UNSAT 2ND REVIEW *** | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE SAME COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW | | | WHICH ARE THE SAME. PLEASE SEE PLANS STILL REFLECTTHE | | | 1999 NEC, AND CODES FROM THE 1996 NEC. | | | NO ELECTRICAL DETAIL SUFFICIENT FOR REVIEW. | | | | | | * ** IMPORTANT** | | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE | | | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE | | | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED | | | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW | | | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE | | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED | | | FOR REFERENCE. | | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND | | | AVOID ANY DELAYS. | | | | | | PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMATION FOR | | | REVIEW. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS, | | | PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CALL. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | | | 2006-11-03 12:36:45 | IN ELEC FROM ZONON 11/2 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-06-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2006-06-21 |
Time |
08:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2006-06-21 |
Time |
08:41 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-06-21 00:00:00 | ********UNSAT ****** | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE WRONG ELECTRICAL | | | CODES ARE REFERENCED. | | | (SHOULD BE 2002) | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE ELECTRICAL | | | DETAIL FOR ALL ELECTRICAL IN SIGN. | | | 106.2.1 | | | | | | PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMATION FOR | | | REVIEW. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS, | | | PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CALL. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | CONSTUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | | 561-805-6717 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-11-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-11-03 |
Time |
08:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-11-03 |
Time |
08:21 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-11-03 08:21:52 | TO "DPALMER" DESK/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-11-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lfranco |
Date |
2006-11-02 |
Time |
11:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lfranco |
Date |
2006-10-11 |
Time |
16:51 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-10-11 16:51:51 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-06-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-06-20 |
Time |
14:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-06-20 |
Time |
14:54 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-06-20 00:00:00 | TO "E" BOX |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
2006-06-28 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-05-26 |
Time |
10:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2006-05-26 00:00:00 | TO "Z" BOX |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-11-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lfranco |
Date |
2006-11-01 |
Time |
10:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lfranco |
Date |
2006-11-01 |
Time |
10:10 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-11-02 11:26:37 | PLANNING AND ZONING ***** FAILED ****** | | | | | | 1. PROVIDE RESPONSES IN WRITING. | | | | | | 2. THE EXISTING FREE STANDING SIGNS WITHIN ST. MARY'S | | | EXCEED THE CITY'S SIGNAGE REGULATIONS.THECITY | | | COMMISSIONSHALL APPROVE A MASTER SIGN PROGRAM FOR THE | | | ST. MARY'S COMMUNITY SERVICE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT | | | (CSPD), PRIOR TOPERMIT APPROVAL FOR ANY NEW SIGN(S) | | | ON THIS SITE. | | | | | | 3. PLEASE ARRANGE TO CONTACT/MEET WITH ME TO GO OVER | | | WHAT THE REQUIREMENT WILL BE FOR THIS APPLICATION. THE | | | ITEMS BELOW ARE SOME OF THE ITEMS THAT WILL BE NEEDED | | | ON THE SURVEY, SITE PLAN AND MASTER SIGNAGE PLAN: | | | | | | A.PROVIDE AND LOCATE ALL EXISTING SIGNAGE THAT IS ON | | | THE PERIMETER OF THE CSPD.PROVIDE AN ENLARGED SITE | | | PLAN SHOWING AREA WHERE THE PROPOSED SIGNAGE IS AND | | | INCLUDE SETBACK DIMENSIONS FROM PROPERTY LINE, ETC. | | | | | | B.PROVIDE APPROVED SITE PLAN/SURVEY WHICH SHOWS TOTAL | | | DIMENSION OF SITE. | | | | | | C. SHOW LINE OF SIGHT TRIANGLE IN RESPECT TO PROPOSED | | | SIGNAGE.SIGNAGE CANNOT BE PLACED ON SAID AREA. | | | | | | D. PROVIDE GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE OF SIGNAGE FACE WHICH | | | SHALL MEET ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE | | | REGULATIONS. | | | | | | 4. THE BULILDING FORMALLY KNOWN AS THE "BLOOD BANK" | | | PARCEL IS AN OUTPARCEL OFTHE ST. MARY (CSPD), | | | DELINIATE THIS OUTPARCEL FROM THE REST OF THE THE SITE. | | | SIGNAGE FOR THIS OUTPARCEL IS CURRENTLY BEING PROPOSED | | | IN THIS AREA AS WELL, THEREFORE IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT | | | ALL COMMENTS ARE ADDRESSED ABOVE TO HAVE A BETTER IDEA | | | WHERE THE PROPOSED SIGNAGE IS LOCATED. | | | | | | SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT: | | | | | | LINDA MIA FRANCO | | | SENIOR PLANNER | | | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | | TEL: (561) 822-1435 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-06-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lfranco |
Date |
2006-06-19 |
Time |
18:23 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lfranco |
Date |
2006-06-16 |
Time |
17:28 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-06-19 00:00:00 | PLANNING AND ZONING: FAILED | | | | | | 1. PROVIDE RESPONSES IN WRITING. | | | | | | 2. PROVIDE AND LOCATE ALL EXISTING | | | SIGNAGE THAT IS ON THE PERIMETER OF THE | | | CS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. PROVIDE AN | | | ENLARGED SITE PLAN SHOWING AREA WHERE | | | THE PROPOSED SIGNAGE IS AND INCLUDE | | | SETBACK DIMENSIONS FROM PROPERTY LINE, | | | ETC. | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE APPROVED SITE PLAN/SURVEY | | | WHICH SHOWS TOTAL DIMENSION OF SITE. | | | THERE ARE NO DIMENSIONS ON SITE PLAN | | | SUBMITTED. | | | | | | 4.SHOW LINE OF SIGHT TRIANGLE IN | | | RESPECT TO PROPOSED SIGNAGE.SIGNAGE | | | CANNOT BE PLACED ON SAID AREA. | | | | | | 5.PROVIDE GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE OF | | | SIGNAGE FACE WHICH SHALL MEET ZONING AND | | | LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE REGULATIONS. | | | | | | 6.THE BLOOD BANK PARCEL IS NOT PART OF | | | THE ST. MARY (CSPD), DELINIATE THIS | | | OUTPARCEL FROM THE REST OF THE THE SITE. | | | SIGNAGE FOR THIS OUTPARCEL IS CURRENTLY | | | BEING PROPOSED IN THIS AREA AS WELL, | | | THEREFORE IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT ALL | | | COMMENTS ARE ADDRESSED ABOVE TO HAVE A | | | BETTER IDEA WHERE THE PROPOSED SIGNAGE | | | IS LOCATED. | | | | | | SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE | | | CONTACT: | | | | | | LINDA MIA FRANCO | | | SENIOR PLANNER | | | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | | TEL: (561) 822-1435 |
|
|
