Plan Review Details - Permit 06031285
Plan Review Stops For Permit 06031285
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2006-06-01 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2006-05-31 Time 18:59 Rev Time 0.75
Received By jgomez Date 2006-05-31 Time 18:38 Sent To PC
Notes
2006-06-01 00:00:00PERMIT UNDER "S".
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2006-05-19 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2006-05-19 Time 15:11 Rev Time 1.00
Received By jgomez Date 2006-05-19 Time 14:40 Sent To  
Notes
2006-05-19 00:00:00RESPONSE TO ENGINEER'S FAX:
  
 1- REGARDING THE SPECIFIC ASSEMBLY,
 ENGINEER AND CONTRACTOR NEED TO
 COORDINATE WHICH ASSEMBLY IS GOING TO BE
 INSTALLED. ASSEMBLY SUBMITTED WAS FOR
 INSULATED SYSTEM. NOW, ASSEMBLY
 SUBMITTED IN ENGINEER'S FAX IS FOR A
 NON-INSULATED ASSEMBLY. PLEASE PROVIDE
 INFORMATION FOR ACTUAL ASSEMBLY THAT IS
 GOING TO BE INSTALLED.
  
 2- REGARDING THE BASE SHEET WIDTH, THE
 NOA PRODUCT APPROVAL HAS THE DIMENSIONS.
 PACKAGE SUMITTED CALLED FOR ELASTOBASE.
 SEE PAGE 3 OF 45 OF THE NOA TO SEE THE
 DIMENSIONS OF THE ELASTOBASE (65'-2" X
 3'-3 3/8").
  
 3- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR
 POLYGLASS BASE SHEET SHOWING THE
 DIMENSIONS. SHEET FAXED SHOWING THE
 POLYGLASS IS NOT THE PRODUCT APPROVAL.
 IT'S MANUFACTURER'S LITERATURE, BUT IS
 NOT THE APPROVED PRODUCT APPROVAL.
  
 4- THE "0.08" VS ".8" IS NOT A
 NITPICKING COMMENT. GO TO THE DADE
 COUNTY NOA WEBSITE AND ENTER THE ".8"
 AND SEE IF YOU CAN FIND THE INFORMATION.
 THAT'S WHY CORRECT INFORMATION IS
 IMPORTANT.
  
 5- REGARDING FASTENER SPECIFICATIONS NOT
 MATCHING, STILL DOESN'T MATCH. PAGE ONE
 CALLS FOR 1 1/4" 11G WITH 1-5/8" TINTAG.
 PAGE ONE OF CALCS CALLS FOR 1 1/4" 11G
 WITH 1 3/4" TINTAG.
 WHAT SIZE OF TINTAG IS IT? 1-5/8"? OR
 1-3/4"?.
 CHECK THIS INFORMATION ALSO IN THE
 FASTENER DIAGRAM SHEET.
  
 6- ALL SHEETS NEED TO HAVE ENGINEER'S
 SEAL, SIGNATURE AND DATE AS REQUIRED BY
 CHAPTER 471 AND FAC.ENGINEER TO
 CONTACT DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL
 ENGINEER'S AT (850)521-0500 TO GET THEIR
 INTERPRETATION ON THIS ISSUE. I CALLED
 THEM SOME TIME AGO AND THEY TOLD ME ALL
 SHEETS NEED TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED.
 THAT'S WHY I AM ENFORCING THIS ISSUE.
 I DIDN'T KNOW ENGINEER TALKED TO ROBERT
 BROWN REGARDING THIS ISSUE. OTHERWISE, I
 COULD INFORM HIM OF MY FINDINGS.
  
 7- PLEASE PICK UP PACKAGE AND RE-SUBMIT
 COMPLETE AND CORRECT PACKAGE.
 RE-SUBMITTAL FEES APPLY.
  
 JULIO GOMEZ
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 (561)805-6712
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2006-05-18 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2006-05-18 Time 16:33 Rev Time 1.00
Received By jgomez Date 2006-05-18 Time 16:33 Sent To  
Notes
2006-05-18 00:00:00BUILDING REVIEW SECOND CHECKLIST:
 1- ACCORDING TO THE DIMENSIONS GIVEN BY
 THE ENGINEER(L:25' AND W:24') TOTAL AREA
 IS 600SF. BUT PERMIT APPLICATION SAYS
 900SF. INFORMATION NEED TO MATCH. REVISE
 AS REQUIRED.
  
 2- ENGINEER TO CAREFULLY REVIEW SPECIFIC
 PRODUCT APPROVAL TO CORRECT THE
 FOLLOWING:
 A) CLEARLY IDENTIFY SPECIFIC ASSEMBLY
 FROM THE APPROVED ASSEMBLIES LISTED IN
 THE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR WHICH THESE
 CALCULATIONS ARE DONE FOR.
 B) FASTENER TYPE DOESN'T MATCH
 FASTENER TYPE SHOWN ON THE PRODUCT
 APPROVAL.
 C) FASTENER SPACING AT SIDE LAP (8")
 FOR ZONE ONE DOESN'T MATCH FASTENER
 SPACING SHOWN ON PRODUCT APPROVAL (12").
 D) NOA NUMBER SPECIFIED ON FIRST SHEET
 DOESN'T MATCH NOA NUMBER SPECIFIED ON
 SHEET ONE OF CALCULATIONS. THERE ARE
 SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THOSE
 TWO NOA'S.
 E) BASE SHEET WIDTH DIMENSION IS
 INCORRECT. SEE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR
 CORRECT DIMENSION.
 F) DESIGN PRESSURES ON SHEET ONE OF
 CALCULATIONS DON'T MATCH THE DESIGN
 PRESSURES SHOWN ON NOA 03-0130.08.
 NOTE: ALSO, SEE CORRECT NOA NUMBER. LAST
 TWO DIGITS AFTER THE PERIOD ARE .O8, NOT
 .8.
 G) FASTENER SHOWN ON THE CALCULATION
 SHEET ONE DOESN'T MATCH FASTENER SHOWN
 ON FIRST PAGE OF ENGINEER'S REPORT.
 H) REVISE INFORMATION ON FASTENER
 DIAGRAM SHEET: FASTENER SPACING AT SIDE
 LAP FOR ZONE ONE AND CORRECT WIDTH
 DIMENSION FOR BASE SHEET.
 I) ENGINEER TO SIGN, SEAL AND DATE ALL
 FOUR PAGES AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 471
 FLORIDA STATUTE AND FAC 61G15-23.002.
  
 NOTE:
 ONE SET OF THE SUBMITTED PACKAGE WAS
 RETAINED IN THIS OFFICE TO SUBMIT TO THE
 BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS FOR
 THEIR REVIEW.
  
 JULIO GOMEZ
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 (561)805-6712.
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2006-03-28 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2006-03-28 Time 15:07 Rev Time 0.50
Received By jgomez Date 2006-03-28 Time 15:07 Sent To  
Notes
2006-03-28 00:00:00BUILDING REVIEW CHECKLIST:
 1- FLAT ROOF SYSTEM: A) ENGINEER TO
 REVIEW GENERAL LIMITATION #7 AND PROVIDE
 CALCULATIONS PER STANDARD RAS 117.
 INFORMATION SUBMITTED DOESN'T APPLY TO
 THIS STANDARD.
  
 B) ENGINEER TO REVIEW SPECIFIC PRODUCT
 APPROVAL SUBMITTED TO SEE FASTENER TYPE
 AND SPACING AND MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURES
 ALLOWED.
  
 2- SPECIFY HOW ARE CLAY TILES ATTACHED.
 POLYFOAM, PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL.
 NAILS OR SCREWS TYPE AND NUMBER TO
 VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE UPLIFT
 MOMENT.
  
 3- OWES $205.68 FOR UPDATED VALUATION.
  
 JULIO GOMEZ
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 (561)805-6712


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved