| 2006-03-22 00:00:00 | BUILDING REVIEW CHECKLIST: |
| | 1- AFTER CORRECTIONS ARE DONE TO THE |
| | ORIGINAL DRAWINGS, TAKE THEM TO PALM |
| | BEACH COUNTY BUILDING TO PAY THE IMPACT |
| | FEES. BRING STAMPED DRAWINGS & RECEIPT. |
| | |
| | 2- NEED RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. |
| | |
| | 3- PROVIDE SOIL TEST REPORT. (2 COPIES). |
| | |
| | 4- SPECIFY SAFETY GLASS FOR WINDOW IN |
| | MASTER BATHROOM SHOWER AS REQ'D BY SEC. |
| | R308.4 2004 RESIDENTIAL CODE. |
| | |
| | 5- SPECIFY ATTIC SIZE AS REQUIRED BY |
| | SEC. R807 2004 RESIDENTIAL CODE. |
| | |
| | 6- REVISE STRUCTURAL NOTE #14: A) 1 3/4" |
| | NAIL IS TOO SHORT. NEED 1 3/4" MIN. |
| | PENETRATION INTO THE WOOD TRUSSES. SEE |
| | COPY OF ASTM C1063 ATTACHED. |
| | B) STUCCO HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH |
| | VENTILATION. THESE ARE 2 DIFFERENT |
| | ISSUES. REVISE NOTE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 7- OWES $317.87 FOR UPDATED VALUATION |
| | AND RADON FEES. |
| | |
| | 8- PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR DOOR AND |
| | WINDOWS DESIGN PRESSURES SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | DESIGN PRESSURS SHOWN FOR SOME OPENINGS |
| | ARE LOWER THAN THOSE SHOWN ON FIGURE |
| | R301.2(8) OF 2004 RESIDENTIAL CODE. |
| | ALSO, PROVIDE CORRECT DESIGN PRESSURES |
| | FOR OPENINGS LOCATED IN THE END ZONE. |
| | SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004 |
| | |
| | 9- PROVIDE FLORIDA OR LOCAL PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL FOR SIMPSON CONNECTOR VTC 2 |
| | SHOWN ON DETAIL D-D, DWG 2 OF 4. |
| | |
| | 10- ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS NEED TO BE |
| | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITTING (TYP. |
| | DONE USING THE STANDARD REVIEW STAMP) BY |
| | THE ENGINEER OF RECORD PRIOR TO |
| | SUBMITTAL TO THIS OFFICE AS REQUIRED BY |
| | SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004 |
| | |
| | 11- SPECIFY 2 LAYERS OF UNDERLAYMENT FOR |
| | 3:12 PITCH AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R905.2.7 |
| | 2004 RESIDENTIAL CODE. |
| | |
| | 12- CONNECTOR FGTR. SEE CATALOGUE FOR |
| | SPECIFIED FASTENER. PROVIDE ENGINEERING |
| | CALCS FOR FASTENERS THAT DIFFER FROM |
| | THOSE TESTED AND PUBLISHED BY THE |
| | MANUFACTURER. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 13- ENERGY CALCULATIONS: A) USE 2004 |
| | FORM, NOT 2001. |
| | B) CEILING FAN CREDIT WAS TAKEN. |
| | THEREFORE, SPECIFY CEILING FANS SIZES IN |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN AS REQUIRED BY TABLE |
| | 13-607.1.A.1 FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 14- A)CLARIFY IF USING DOORS AND WINDOWS |
| | WITH HURRICANE MISSILE IMPACT GLAZING OR |
| | NOT. PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED ARE FOR |
| | WINDOWS WITH IMPACT GLAZING, BUT PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL FOR DOORS SUBMITTED IS FOR |
| | NON-IMPACT GLAZING. |
| | IF USING SHUTTERS, THEN, PROVIDE KEY |
| | PLAN AND A COMPLETE INSTALLATION |
| | SCHEDULE. SEE ATTACHED SAMPLE AND |
| | COMPLETE ALL THE INFORMATION. |
| | B) IF USING FRENCH DOORS WITH IMPACT |
| | GLAZING, THEN PROVIDE CORRESPONDING |
| | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 15- ENGINEER TO SPECIFY ALL LIVE LOADS |
| | AND DEAD LOADS FOR ROOF TRUSSES. SEE |
| | TABLE R301.5 FOR MIN. LIVE LOADS |
| | REQUIRED. DEAD LOADS NEED TO CONSIDER |
| | THE ACTUAL WEIGHT OF MATERIALS. SEC. |
| | 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 16- PROVIDE SECTION/DETAIL SHOWING HOW |
| | ARE ROOF TRUSSES ATTACHED TO EXISTING |
| | EXTERIOR BEARING WALL. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 17- PREFABRICATED WOOD TRUSSES AND |
| | GIRDERS NOTE #1 NEED TO BE REVISED. |
| | REFERENCE THE RESIDENTIAL CODE. SEE SEC. |
| | R802.10 2004 RESIDENTIAL CODE. |
| | |
| | 18- ROOF FRAMING PLAN: WHAT OR WHERE IS |
| | DETAIL D 2/3?. |
| | |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (5610805-6712 |