|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Plan Review Details - Permit 06020557
| Plan Review Stops For Permit 06020557 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2006-04-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mjacobs |
Date |
2006-04-05 |
Time |
11:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mjacobs |
Date |
2006-04-05 |
Time |
06:09 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-03-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mjacobs |
Date |
2006-03-23 |
Time |
18:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mjacobs |
Date |
2006-03-23 |
Time |
17:01 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-03-23 00:00:00 | 1) THE APPROVED ASSEMBLY SELECTED FROM | | | THE NOA IS FOR A WOOD INSULATED ASSEMBLY | | | WITH A -60PSF. THE ENGINEER LETTER | | | REFERS ONLY TO THE ENHANCEMENTOF THE | | | BASE SHEET. WHAT ABOUT THE ENHANCEMENT | | | FOR THE INSULATION? | | | | | | 2) NOTE: THE INFORMATION OR LETTER FROM | | | THE ENGINEER IS A STATEMENT AND NOT THE | | | CALCULATIONS .GENERAL LIMITATION | | | CLEARLY STATED THAT CALCULATIONS SHALL | | | BE PREPARED BY A FLORIDA REGISTERDE | | | PROFESSIONAL FOR THE ENHANCED UPLIFT | | | PRESSURES. SO, SUBMIT THE CALCULATIONS | | | FOR THE ENHANCED UPLIFT PRESSURES OF THE | | | BASE SHEET AND THE INSULATION WHICH WILL | | | MEET THE REQUIRED PRESSURE FOR THIS | | | PROJECT. | | | | | | MYRON JACOBS | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEWER | | | TEL:(561)805-6726 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-03-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mjacobs |
Date |
2006-03-13 |
Time |
07:25 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
mjacobs |
Date |
2006-03-13 |
Time |
06:56 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2006-03-13 00:00:00 | 1) PLEASE HI-LIGHT OR CIRCLE THE TYPE OF | | | APPROVED ASSEMBLY WHICH WILL BE USED. IS | | | IT WOOD INSULATED OR WOOD NON-INSULATED. | | | | | | 2) NOTE: GENERAL LIMITATION #7 REQUIRES | | | THE CALCULATIONS TO BE PREPARED BY A | | | FLORIDA REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL | | | ENGINEER, ARCHITECT, OR REGISTERED ROOF | | | CONSULTANT. THE CALCULATOONS SHALL BE | | | SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE PROFESSIONAL | | | WHO DOES THE CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | MYRON JACOBS | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEWER | | | TEL:(561)805-6726 | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-03-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mjacobs |
Date |
2006-02-13 |
Time |
06:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mjacobs |
Date |
2006-02-13 |
Time |
11:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2006-02-13 00:00:00 | 1) THE FLORIDA STATE SHEET DOES NOT | | | MATCH THE NOA. | | | | | | 2) FBC 1609.7.1THE SYSTEM SELECTED | | | FROM THE SUBMITTED FLAT ROOF PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL NOA HAS A MAXIMUM DESIGN | | | PRESSURE OF LESS THAN -89 PSF AND CITES | | | GENERAL LIMITATION #9 (SEE PAGE 15 OF | | | 21).GENERAL LIMITATION #9 PROHIBITS | | | RATIONAL ANALYSIS OR EXTRAPOLATION TO | | | ENHANCE THE UPLIFT PRESSURE AT PERIMETER | | | AND CORNER AREAS BY REDUCING THE | | | FASTENER SPACING IN THESE AREAS.EITHER | | | SELECT AN ALTERNATIVE SYSTEM (OR PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL) THAT DOES NOT CITE GENERAL | | | LIMITATION #9.ALTERNATIVELY IF THE | | | SELECTED SYSTEM DOES CITE GENERAL | | | LIMITATION #9, IT MUST HAVE A MAXIMUM | | | DESIGN PRESSURE THAT EXCEEDS THE | | | PRESSURE IN ROOF ZONE 3 (TYPICALLY -89 | | | PSF FOR MEAN ROOF HEIGHT OF 30 FEET OR | | | LESS). |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-02-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mjacobs |
Date |
2006-02-13 |
Time |
11:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mjacobs |
Date |
2006-02-13 |
Time |
11:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |
|
