Plan Review Details - Permit 06011238
Plan Review Stops For Permit 06011238
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 5 Status F Date 2007-07-02 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2007-07-02 Time 17:00 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2007-07-02 Time 17:00 Sent To PC
Notes
2007-07-02 17:02:09BUILDING REVIEW 5TH CHECKLIST:
  
 ***NOTE: PREVIOUS ENGINEER RESIGNED.THERE IS A NEW
 ENGINEER ON BOARD. NEW PLANS REVIEWED THIS TIME.
  
 1- SEE COMMENTS REGARDING FRONT PORCH.AREA
 TABULATIONS AND DRAWINGS TO BE REVISED ACCORDINGLY.
  
 2- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE
 9B-72 FOR:
 A) FLAT ROOF.NEED TO SPECIFY WHICH APPROVED
 ASSEMBLY AND FASTENING OPTION IS GOING TO BE USED AS
 REQUIRED BY CITY POLICY FOR ROOFING PERMITS. SEE
 ATTACHED COPY.
 *** ALSO, NEED TO PROVIDE RAS 117 CALCULATIONS AS
 REQUIRED BY GENERALLIMITATION #7 ON LAST PAGE OF NOA
 03-0501.02 SUBMITTED.
  
 B) WINDOW MULLIONS.
  
 C) GLASS BLOCK.
  
 D) FRONT AND REAR SWING DOORS AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
  
 E) ARCHED WINDOWS AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
  
 3- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING
 (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING)ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS
 REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3. CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.
 *** SOME OF THE PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED HAVE A
 REVIEWED & APPROVED STAMP.THIS INFORMATION ALONE IS
 NOT ADEQUATE BECASUE IS MISSINGTHE NAME OF THE
 ENGINEER APPROVING THE PRODUCT APPROVAL.
  
 4-A) INFORMATION ON NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT IS
 INCOMPLETE.GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENT
 INFORMATION IS NOT PROVIDED.
  
 B) NEED RE-RECORDEDNOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT.IT WAS
 RECORDED ON 01/26/07. NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT EXPIRES
 AFTER 90 DAYS IF WORK IS NOT STARTED. SEC. 713.13
 FLORIDA STATUTE.
  
 5- ENERGY CALCULATIONS:
 A) IF CALCULATIONS ARE NOT DONE FOR WORST CASE
 SCENARIO, THEN THEY MUST BE DONE REFLECTING THE ACTUAL
 HOUSE ORIENTATION.SEE SURVEY FOR CORRECT HOUSE
 ORIENTATION AND REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 B) OVERHANG HEIGHT IS INCORRRECT. REVISE AS
 REQUIRED.
  
 C) OWNER/AGENT TO SIGN AND DATE BOTTOM OF FORM.
  
 D) COMPLETE ALL INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM.
  
 6- SHEET C1:
 A) SPECIFY CONSTRUCTION TYPE AS REQUIRED BY SEC.
 602.1 FBC 2004.
  
 B) COMPONENTS AND CLADDING INFORMATIONIS VERY
 CONFUSING.SEE REVISED TABLE 1609.6.2.1(2) FBC 2004
 AND REVISE INFORMATION AS REQUIRED.
  
 7- SHEET A1:
 A) WHERE IS THE REAR COVERED PATIO SHOWED ON AREA
 CALCULATIONS?.ENTRY PORCH AREA NEED TO BE REVISED.
 SEE ZONING COMMENTS..
  
 B) FLOOR PLANS CALL FOR "PROVIDE V JOIST WHERE
 EXISTING MEETS PROPOSED? WHAT'S THIS FOR?. PROVIDE
 COMPLETE DETAIL. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMETNS TOO FBC
 2004.
  
 8- SHEET A2:
 A) WINDOWS SHOWN AT NEW MASTER BATHROOM AND NEW
 FAMILY ROOM AREA DON'T MATCH TYPE OF WINDOW SPECIFIED
 ON PLANS. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 9- SHEET A3:
 A) FLAT ROOF ASEMBLY SPECIFIED ON SEC. A/A-3 DOENS'T
 MATCH ASSEMBLY SHOWN ON SEC. B/A-3. REVISE AS
 REQUIRED.
  
 B) BUILDING SECTIONS TO SHOW HOW TO PROVIDE CROSS
 VENTILATION IN FLAT ROOF AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R806 OF
 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE.
  
 C) SPECIFY FIREBLOCKING IN WALL SECTIONS AS REQUIRED
 BY SEC. R602.1.2 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE.
  
 D) SEC. B/A-3:
 * SPECIFY HOW IS THE FOOTING COMPLYING WITH SEC.
 R403.1.4 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE.
 ** CLARIFY SPECS GIVEN TO BOND BEAM. INFORMATION TO
 MATCH OTHER BUILDING SECTIONS AND PLANS.
 *** ALL FRAMING MEMBERS SIZES TO MATCH ROOF FRAMING
 PLAN.
 **** CLARIFY HOW INSTALLING A 2X8 FASCIA ON A 2X12 ROOF
 JOIST?
  
 E) REVISE ROOF SHEATHING NAILING SPACING. SEE SEC.
 R803.2.3.1 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE AND REVISE
 SPACING FOR ZONE 3AS REQUIRED.
  
 F) SEC. A/A-3:
 * CLARIFYINSTALLATION OF NEW ROOF JOIST TO EXISTING
 MASONRY WALL.PROVIDE ENLARGED DETAIL AND COMPLETE
 SPECS SHOWING HOW IS THE JOIST SECURED TO EXISTING BEAM
 USING SAIMPSON MTSM20 AND USING JOIST HANGER MUS26.
 NOTE: MUS26 IS A WOOD TO WOOD CONNECTOR. IT DOESN'T
 WORK FOR PROPOSED INSTALALTION.SEC. 106.1.2 CITY
 AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.
  
  
 10- PLEASE RETURNREVIEWED SET AFTER CORRECTIONS ARE
 DONE TO ORIGINAL PLANS TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS.
  
 11- PROVIDE STRUCTURAL BUCK DETAIL AND SPECS FOR DOORS.
 SEE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR REQUIRED SIZE AND SEC.
 R613.6.2 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDETNAIL CODE FOR PROPER
 WAY OF INSTALLING BUCK.
  
 12- AFTER PLANS ARE REVISED BRING THEM TO PALM BEACH
 COUNTY (2300 N JOG RD (561)233-5115)SO THEY CAN
 UPDATE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE. BRING BACK STAMPED PLANS
 AND COPY OF PAID RECEIPT IF ADDITINAL FEES ARE DUE.
  
 13- PROVIDESOIL TEST REPORT REFERENCED IN THE
 ARCHITECTURAL PLANS.
  
 14-PERMIT VALUATION WILL BE ADJUSTED AFTER FRONT
 PORCH ISSUE IS RESOLVED WITH ZONING.ADDITIONAL PERMIT
 VALUATION FEES FEES WILL BE CHARGED AS REQUIRED BY SEC.
 108.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.
  
 JULIO GOMEZ
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 (561)805-6712
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2007-03-01 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2007-03-01 Time 17:29 Rev Time 3.00
Received By jgomez Date 2007-03-01 Time 07:47 Sent To  
Notes
2007-03-01 17:30:09BUILDING REVIEW FOURTH CHECKLIST:
 1- ENGINEER NEEDS TO COORDINATE ALL DRAWINGS, DETAILS,
 CALCULATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS. DRAWINGS ARE
 CONFUSING.
 *DETAILS DON'T MATCH.
 **THERE ARE DIFFERENT DESIGN PRESSURES SHOWN ON
 DRAWINGS 1 AND 6 AND ON SEPARATE DESIGN PRESSURES
 CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED.
 ***HURRICANE SHUTTERS NOTES DON'T MATCH INSTALLATION
 SCHEDULE INFORMATION.SHUTTERS INSTALLATION SPECS ARE
 NOT REQUIRED TO BE PART OF THE DRAWINGS. THIS
 INFORMATION IS PROVIDED IN THE SHUTTERS INSTALLATION
 SCHEDULE AND PRODUCT APPROVAL.
 ****SECTION 2/A1: HOW ISTHE 16" FOOTER 12" BELOW
 GRADE IF SECTION SHOWS 6" ABOVE GRADE?.
 *****FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS ARE CONSFUSING AND NOT
 MATCHING.FLOOR PLAN ON DRAWING #2 CALLS FOR STEP NO
 REQUIRED AT NEW MASTER BEDROOM, WHILE SHOWING A 7"
 STEP. ALSO, SEE FINISHED FLOR ELEVATION SHOWN ON PLANS
 AND ON SURVEY.
 ******SECTION 2/A7 CALLS FOR CONNECTOR HTSM20 TO
 SUPPORT 2X12 JOIST TO EXISTING WALL.PROVIDE COMPLETE
 DETAIL SHOWING INSTALLATION. THIS DETAIL DOESN'T WORK.
  
 *******HOW IS R30 INSULATION INSTALLED ON 2X12 JOIST
 TO ALLOW CROSS VENTILATION?.
 ********NOTES FOR FLAT ROOF NAIL ENHANCING MAKE NO
 SENSE.ROOF ZONES WERE INVERTED.ZONE 1 SPECIFIES
 MORE NAILS THAN ZONE 3 AND INFORMATION SHALL BE THE
 OTHER WAY AROUND. AND, NUMBER OF ROWS IS NOT CLEAR.
 *********ACCORDING TO THE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS, THERE A
 SOME WINDOWS THAT NEED TO BE SPECIFIED WITH SAFETY
 GLASS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R308.4 2004 FLORIDA
 RESIDENTAIL CODE. SEE MASTER BEDRO**OM WINDOW, FAMILY
 ROOM WINDOW, EXISTING BEDROOM WINDOW AND FAMILY ROOM
 WINDOW.
 ********SECTION 2/A1 DOESN'T MATCH FOUNDATION PLAN.
 ***********FLOOR PLAN CALLS FOR SINGLE HUNG WINDOW AT
 KITCHEN AREA, WHILE WINDOW SCHEDULE CALLS FOR FIXED
 WINDOW.NEED MATCHING INFORMATION.
  
 THESE ARE JUST A FEW ITEMS THAT NEED TO BE COORDINATED
 AND REVISED. ENGINEER TO REVIEW COMPLETE SET OF PLANS
 AND COORDINATE ACCORDINGLY.THIS IS THE FOURTH TIME
 PLANS ARE DENIED.ONE COPY OF PLANS WILL BE RETAINED
 IN THIS OFFICE TO BE SEND TO THE FLORIDA BOARD OF
 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS FORREVIEW.
  
 2- PROVIDE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER
 13 FBC 2004.
  
 3- NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT HAS NO DESCRIPTION FOR
 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENT. COMPLETE
 INFORMATION AND RE-RECORD THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT.
  
 4- STORM SHUTTERS:
 *NO CLEAR WHAT TYPE OF ANCHOR WILL BE USED. SEE STORM
 SHUTTERS DRAWINGS AND CLEARLY IDENTIFY SPECIFIC
 ANCHOR.
 **OPENIG SIZE DOESN'T MATCH PLANS.
 ***DESIGN PRESSURES DON'T MATCH PLANS.
 ****SHUTTER SPAN IS WRONG. IT CAN'T BE THE SAME SIZE OF
 THE OPENING. ALSO, THEEDGE DISTANCENEED TO BE
 CONSIDERED. CLARIFY WHY USING 5" AS EDGE DISTANCE.
 *****ENGINEER TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING STORM
 SHUTTERS PRODUCT APPROVAL, NOT SIGNING AND SEALING.
  
 5- ENGINEER TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITTING (NOT
 SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS REQUIRED
 BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. SOME OF
 THE PRODUCT APPROVALS SAY REVIEWED, BUT IT DOESN'T SAY
 WHO REVIEWED AND APPROVE IT. NEED TO BE CLEAR WHO
 REVIEWED AND APPROVED THEM.
  
 6- ENGINEER SEPARATE CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED:
 *ALL THESE CALCULATIONS ARE NOT REQUIRED. ONLY THING
 THAT WAS REQUIRED WAS THE RAS 117 CALCULATIONS FOR FLAT
 ROOF NAIL ENHANCING AT PERIMETER AND CORNER AREAS. REST
 OF CALCULATIONS ARE NOT REQUIRED. BESIDES, SOME
 CALCULATIONS DON'T MATCH INFORMATION SUBMITTED ON
 PLANS.
 **WHY USING 20SF AS TRIBUTARY AREA?
 ***FIRST PARAGRAPH ON PAGE 4 OF SUBMITTED CALCULATIONS
 STATES THAT GENERAL LIMITATION #7 ONLY APPLIES TO ZONE
 3. THIS IS WRONG. GENERAL LIMITATION #7 APPPLIES AT ALL
 TIMES WHEN THE DESIGN PRESSURES OF SELECTED FLAT ROOF
 SYSTEM IS LOWER THAN DESIGN PRESSURES REQUIRED TO BE
 RESISTED AT ALL ROOF AREAS. IN THIS CASE NEED TO
 PROVIDE NAIL ENHANCING FOR ZONE 2 AND ZONE 3. REVISE AS
 REQUIRED.
 ****ALSO, ON PAGE 4 OF SUBMITTED CALCULATIONS IS NOT
 CLEAR HOW MANY ROWS ARE REQUIRED.CLEARLY IDENTIFY
 SPACING AT THE LAP AND HOW MANY ADDITIONAL ROWS ARE
 REQUIRED. SEE PAGE 28 OF NOA 03-0501.02 SUBMITTED FOR
 PROPER WAY OF SPECIFYING FASTENER SPACING AND ROWS
 REQUIRED.
  
 7- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE
 9B-72 FOR:
 *FIXED WINDOWS. SEE PLANS.
 **SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS.PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED WAS
 SUPERSEDED BY DADE COUNTY PRODUCT APPROVAL DIVISION.
 SEE ATTACHED COPY OF CURRENT NOA. ENGINEER TO REVIEW
 AND APPROVE THIS NEW NOA.
  
 8-ENGINEER TO PAY PLAN REVIEW FEES AS REQUIRED BY SEC.
 553.80(2)(B) FLORIDA STATUTE. SEE ATTACHED COPY.
  
 JULIO GOMEZ
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 (561)805-6712
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2006-10-23 Cont ID  
Sent By tgordon Date 2006-10-23 Time 15:02 Rev Time 3.00
Received By jgomez Date 2006-10-23 Time 07:47 Sent To  
Notes
2006-10-23 15:07:07BUILDING REVIEW THIRD CHECKLIST:
 1-NEED RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT.
  
 2-AFTER ORIGINAL PLANS ARE REVISED BY THE ENGINEER,
 BRING THEM TO PALM BEACH COUNTY (2300 N JOG ROD) TO PAY
 IMPACT FEES. BRING BACK STAMPED DRAWINGS AND COPY OF
 PAID RECEIPT.
  
 3-MASTER BEDROOM EGRESS WINDOW 3'-0" X 6'-0" DOESN'T
 FIT IN THAT CORNER.WALL IS ONLY 3'-7. REVISE AS
 REQUIRED.
  
 4- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR 5'-0" X 6'-0" SINGLE
 HUNG WINDOWS AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. ALSO, SEE WINDOW
 PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR CORRECT WINDOW SIZES. WINDOW SIZES
 SPECIFIED ON PLANS ARE NOT FOUND IN THE PRODUCT
 APPROVAL SIZE CHART. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 5-STORM SHUTTERS:
 A)ENGINEER CAN'T SIGN AND SEAL PRODUCT APPROVAL.
 ENGINEER WAS ASKED TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITTING
 (EG: TYPICAL REVIEW STAMP) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS
 REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.
  
 B) THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT DRAWINGS SUBMITTED. POMA
 AND WEATHERGUARD BUILDING PRODUCTS. PROVIDE COMPLETE
 AND LEGIBLE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR ONLY ONE COMPANY.
  
 6-FLAT ROOF PRODUCT APPROVAL:
 A) ENGINEER TO REVIEW AND APPROVE PRODUCT APPROVAL.
 DON'T SIGN AND SEAL IT.
  
 B)ASSEMBLY SUBMITTED IS FOR TILE UNDERLAYMENT.
 ENGINEER CALLS FOR NON-INSULATED ASSEMBLY ON PAGE 24.
 BUT, NOA 03-0501.02 PAGE 24 IS FOR INSULATED ASSEMBLY.
 COORDINATE ALL INFORMATION AND RESUBMIT COMPLETE
 PRODUCT APPROVAL.
  
 C)ENGINEER TO USE EFFECTIVE WIND AREA OF 10S.F.
 FOR COMPONENT AND CLADDING WIND LOADS WHEN DETERMINING
 THE FASTENER SPACING FOR FLAT ROOF BASE SHEET. SEE ASCE
 7-02FIGURE 6-3 NOTE #4 AND TABLE ON PAGE 45. REVISE
 CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED OR USE NUMBERS DIRECTLY FROM
 THE TABLE.THEN REVISE RAS 117 CALCULATIONS AND
 PROPOSED NAIL SPACING.
  
 D) ENGINEER TO CLARIFY IF PROPOSED NAIL SPACING FOR
 ZONE 3 IS THREEROWS TOTAL OR ONE ROW AT THE SIDE LAP
 AND THEN THREE ROWS EQUALLY SPACED IN THE FIELD OF THE
 SHEET.
  
 7-PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR:
 A)ALL SIMPSON STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON
 PLANS.
  
 B)FIXED WINDOW.
  
 C)CONCRETE LINTELS.
  
 8- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITTING
 (NOT SIGN AND SEAL)ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS REQUIRED
 BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.
  
 9-DRAWING #1:
 A) SECTION 2/A1 AND FOUNDATION PLAN DON'T MATCH. ONE
 SHOWS STEM WALL FOOTING AND THE OTHER SHOWS MONOLITHIC
 FOOTING. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 B)FOUNDATION PLAN SHOWS EXISTING FINISH FLOOR SLAB
 INMASTER BEDROOM AT 9.14" AND MAIN HOUSE AT 16.14".
 CLARIFY WHY THE DIFFERENCE AND THERE ARE NO STEPS FROM
 ONE ROOM TO THE OTHER? REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 10- DRAWING #3: CLARIFY WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN
 BEAMS B-1 AND B-2. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC
 2004.
  
 11-PROVIDE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER
 13 FBC 2004.
  
 12-DRAWING #7:
 A) R-30 INSULATION DOESN'T FIT IN 2X8 ROOF JOIST.
 REVISE AS REQUIRED.
 B) WALL SECTION 2/A7: REVISE HUS26 CONNECTOR AT
 MASONRY WALL. NEED TO SPECIFY MASONRY CONNECTOR. HUS26
 IS A WOOD TO WOOD CONNECTOR. SEE CURRENT CATALOGUE AND
 REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 13-PLEASE MAKE SURE ALL DRAWINGS ARE CLEAR AND
 LEGIBLE. SOME DRAWINGS ARE TOO LIGHT AND BLURRY.
  
 14- ENGINEER WILL BE REQUIRED TO PAY REVIEW FEES AS
 REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B). SEE ATTACHED
 COPY.
  
 JULIO GOMEZ
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 (561)805-6712
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2006-07-19 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2006-07-19 Time 16:36 Rev Time 6.00
Received By jgomez Date 2006-07-19 Time 07:37 Sent To  
Notes
2006-07-19 00:00:00BUILDING REVIEW 2ND CHECKLIST:
  
 ***NOTE:
 A) ENGINEER'SPLANS ARE INCOMPLETE AND
 CONFUSING.
  
 B) ENGINEER TO SEE ATTACHED COPY OF FL.
 ST. 553.80(2)(B) REGARDING MULTIPLE
 REVIEWS OF DESIGN PROFESSIONALS
 DOCUMENTS.
  
 1- WALL LEGEND AND INFORMATION SHOWN ON
 FLOOR PLAN DON'T MATCH AND IS
 CONFUSING. UNABLE TO DETERMINE WHAT IS
 EXISTING AND WHAT'S NEW. THERE ARE MANY
 TYPES OF WALLS SHOWN IN FLOOR PLAN, BUT
 NOT IN THE WALL LEGEND.
  
 2- PLANS SHOW WALL LEADING TO THE NEW
 KITCHEN AREA TO BE REMOVED. ACCORDING TO
 PALM BEACH COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISAL
 INFORMATION THIS IS A BEARING WALL.
 DRAWINGS DON'T SHOW ANY SPECIFICATIONS
 AND CONSIDERATION FOR REMOVAL OF BEARING
 WALL. NEED TO SHOW SHORING AND HOW IS
 EXISTING AND NEW STRUCTURE GOING TO BE
 SUPPORTED.
 ENGINEER TO PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS
 ADDRESSING THE STRUCTURAL
 STABILITY ISSUE. SECTION 106.1.2 OF CITY AMENDMENTS TO
 FBC 2004.
 ***PLANS SHOW LIKE THIS IS A NEW WALL.
 IS THIS A NEW WALL?
  
 3- NEED RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT.
 ***NO DONE.
  
 4- AFTER ORIGINAL PLANS ARE REVISED BY
 THE ENGINEER, BRING THEM TO PALM BEACH
 COUNTY TO PAY IMPACT FEES. BRING BACK
 STAMPED DRAWINGS AND PAID RECEIPT.
 ***NO DONE.
  
 5- AS OF JANURARY 1ST 2006 ENGINEER
 NEEDS TO USE NEW SEAL AS REQUIRED
 BY FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE.
 ***NO DONE. ENGINEER STILL USES THE SEAL
 READING "CERTIFICATE" NOT LICENSE.
  
 6- A) MASTER BEDROOM SPECIFIED AWNING
 WINDOW DOESN'T COMPLY WITH EGRESS
 REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION R310 2004
 RESIDENTIAL CODE. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
 B) FAMILY ROOM WINDOW (MAY ALSO BE AN
 SLEEPING ROOM) DOESN'T COMPLY WITH
 SECT.R310 2004 RESIDENTIAL CODE. REVISE
 AS REQUIRED.
 ***SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS SHOWN ON
 ELEVATIONS DON'T COMPLY WITH EGRESS.
 ALSO, CLEARLY SPECIFY SIZE OF WINDOW.
 SPECIFY WIDTH AND HEIGHT OF WINDOW.
  
 7- A) PROVIDE FLORIDA OR LOCAL PRODUCT
 APPROVAL FOR STORM SHUTTERS AS REQUIRED
 BY RULE 9B-72 OF DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY
 AFFAIRS.
 ***PROVIDE CLEAR AND LEGIBLE DRAWINGS.
  
 B) PROVIDE KEY PLAN AND A COMPLETE
 INSTALLATION SCHEDULE FOR STORM
 SHUTTERS. SEE ATTACHED SAMPLE AND
 PROVIDE ALL THE REQUIRED INFORMATION.
 SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC.
 ***NO DONE.
  
 8- PROVIDE FLORIDA OR LOCAL PRODUCT
 APPROVAL (REQ'D BY RULE 9B-72) FOR:
 A) FLAT ROOF SYSTEM (CLEARLY INDICATE
 WHICH OF THE APPROVED SYSTEMS IS GOING
 TO BE INSTALLED. CHECK IF LIMITATION #7
 OR #9 APPLIES AND PROVIDE REQUIRED
 INFORMATION).
 ***NO DONE. COMPLETE NOA SUBMITTED
 WITHOUT IDENTIFYING SPECIFIC APPROVED
 ASSEMBLY. AND, LIMITATION #7 CALLS FOR CALCULATIONS PER
 RAS 117. CALCULATIONS
 WERE NOT PROVIDED. BESIDES ENGINEER IS
 CONFUSING RAS CALCULATIONS FOR ROOF
 COVERING VS ROOF SHEATHING.
 ***NOTE: LIMITATION #9 CAN'T BE USED IN
 THIS AREA. DON'T COMPLY WITH DESIGN
 PRESSURES FOR CORNER & PERIMETER AREAS.
  
 ***DADE COUNTY NOA #01-0129.15 EXPIRED
 05/03/2006. NEED TO PROVIDE CURRENT NOA.
  
 B) ALL STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS.
 SPECIFIED ON PLANS. SEE PLANS & DETAILS.
 ***NO DONE.
  
 C) TYPE OF WINDOWS TO BE INSTALLED.
 ***ENGINEER CAN'T SIGN AND SEAL THIS
 PRODUCT APPROVAL. ONLY REVIEW & APPROVE
 IT. RE-SUBMIT NEW ONES
  
 D) EXTERIOR DOOR.
 ***ENGINEER CAN'T SIGN AND SEAL IT.
  
 E) CONCRETE LINTELS.
 ***NO DONE.
  
 9- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND
 APPROVE IN WRITTING (TYPICALLY DONE BY
 USING THE STANDARD REVIEW STAMP) ALL
 PRODUCT APPROVALS PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO
 THIS OFFICE AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3
 OF CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.
 ***ENGINEER IS NOT ALLOWED TO SIGN AND
 SEAL THESE PRODUCT APPROVALS BECAUSE HE
 IS NOT THE DESIGNER. THE REQUEST WAS TO
 REVIEW AND APPROVE THEM, NOT SIGN AND
 SEAL THEM.
  
 10- ENGINEER TO SPECIFY CONCRETE
 LINTELS. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO
 FBC 2004.
 ***NO DONE.
  
 11- PROVIDE STRUCTURAL BUCK DETAIL FOR
 EXTERIOR DOOR. SEE SECTION R613.6.2 OF
 2004 RESIDENTIAL CODE FOR PROPER WAY OF
 INSTALLING STRUCTURAL BUCK. ALSO, CHECK
 PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR REQUIRED BUCK SIZE.
 ***NO DONE. IF USING STEEL DOOR WITH
 STEEL EDGE, THEN SPECIFY IT ON PLANS AND
 SPECIFY ATTACHMENT TO THE STRUCTURE. SEE
 PRODUCT APPROVAL.
  
 12- PROVIDE DETAIL/SECTION FOR STEEL
 COLUMN SHOWING CONNECTIONS AT TOP AND
 BOTTOM OR COLUMN. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY
 AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.
 ***DETAIL IS WRONG. A) 1'-0" HIGH BRAKET
 FOR 2X8 BEAM?. B)SIZE OF COLUMN DOESN'T
 MATCH COLUMN SCHEDULE. C)FOUNDATION PLAN
 DOESN'T SHOW CONCRETE PAD. D) 8" SPACING
 FOR BOTTOM PLATE ANCHORS, WHILE BOTTOM
 PLATE IS ONLY 7" WIDE?. E)HOW MANY #3
 BARS IN FOOTING? F) TOP OF DETAIL
 DOESN'T MATCH ROOF FRAMING PLANS? G)IS
 THIS DETAIL FOR NEW COLUMN AT MASTER
 BEDROOM WING OR FOR NEW COLUMNS AT ENTRY
 PORCH?
  
 13- SPECIFY ROOF CROSS VENTILATION AS
 REQUIRED BY SEC. R806 2004 RESIDENTIAL
 CODE.
 ***HOW IS VENTILATION ACHIEVED IF
 SHOWING INSULATION ON THE EAVE AND THERE
 IS A (2)2X8 BEAM?
  
 14- DRAWING #1: A) REVISE CONCRETE COVER
 FOR FOUNDATION BEAM. SEE ACI 318-02.
 ***NO DONE. REVISE AS REQUIRED AND SEE
 ALSO STEEL NOTE AT BOTTOM OF STRUCTURAL
 NOTES ON SAME PAGE.
  
 ***FOUNDATION PLAN AND SITE PLAN DON'T
 MATCH. REVISE MASTER BEDROOM CLOSET
 CORNER AREA AS REQUIRED.
  
 B) SECTIONS AND DETAILS KEYED ON
 PLANS DON'T MATCH. COORDINATE ALL
 DETAILS AND SECTIONS AS REQUIRED.
 ***NO DONE. KEYED DETAILS ARE CONFUSING.
  
 C) PROVIDE ONLY THE DETAILS THAT
 APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. WHERE IS
 CONNECTOR SSTB16 GOING TO BE USED? AND
 HOW? SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS FBC.
 ***NO DONE. THERE IS A LOT OF INFO. THAT
 DOESN'T APPLY TO THIS JOB.
  
 D) WHAT'S THE CONSTRUCTION OF
 EXTERIOR WALL AT MASTER BEDROOM CLOSET.
 THERE ARE NOT SPECS FOR COLUMNS, WALLS,
 BEAMS, ETC. PROVIDE COMPLETE
 INFORMATION. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY
 AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.
 ***NO DONE. IT DOESN'T MATCH WALL LEGEND
  
 15- DRAWING #2: A) SPECIFY SAFETY GLASS
 FOR MASTER BATHROOM WINDOW. SEC. R308.4
 2004 RESIDENTIAL CODE.
 ***DESIGNER OF RECORD TO SPECIFY SAFETY
 GLASS. DON'T CITE CODE SECTION. PROVIDE
 SPECIFIC INFORMATION. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY
 AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.
  
 B) WIND LOAD DESIGN PARAMETERS:
 CLARIFY IF BUILDING IS DESIGNED AS
 ENCLOSED OR PARTIALLY ENCLOSED. SEC.
 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.
 ***INTERNAL PRESSURE COEFFICIENT IS
 SPELLED GCPI, NOT CCPI. SEE ASCE -02.
  
 *** IF DESIGNED AS PARTIALLY OPEN, THEN
 WHY PROVIDING INFORMATION FOR STORM
 SHUTTERS? DO OTHER OPENINGS DON'T HAVE
 STORM SHUTTERS?. CLARIFY AS REQUIRED.
  
 C) HOW IS OPENING FOR DOOR TO BE
 REMOVED GOING TO BE ENCLOSED. SEC.
 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.
 ***IT'S NOT CLEAR WHAT'S NEW WALL. IF
 EXISTING WALL IS BEARING OR NOT.
  
 D) INFORMATION FOR STEEL COLUMN IN
 COLUMN SCHEDULE DOESN'T MATCH INFO. ON
 COLUMN SCHEDULE ON DRAWING #1.
  
 16- DRAWING #3: A) PROVIDE ONLY THE
 DETAILS THAT APPLY TO THIS PROJECT.
 ***ROOF COVERING INFORMATION IS NOT
 REQUIRED IN THIS DRAWING. ENGINEER IS
 CONFUSING ROOF COVERING WITH ROOF
 SHEATHING. PRODUCT APPROVAL LIMITATION
 #7 FOR FLAT ROOF SYSTEM REQUIRES
 CALCULATIONS DONE PER RAS 117. THIS IS
 DIFFERENT THAN CALCULATIONS DONE FOR
 ROOF SHEATHING. ENGINEER TO READ GENERAL LIMITATION #7
 ON LAST PAGE OF NOA AND
 PROVIDE THE REQUIRED CALCULATIONS.
  
 B) SHOW IN PLANS LOCATION OF BEAMS
 SPECIFIED ON THE BEAM SCHEDULE. SEC.
 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.
 ***WHICH ONE IS B1 AND WHICH IS B2?
  
 C) SHOW ROOF SLOPE AND ORIENTATION.
 SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC.
 ***NO DONE. FLAT ROOFS SLOPE IS NOT
 SPECIFIED ON ROOF PLAN.
  
 D) PROVIDE COMPLETE WALL SECTION AT
 MASTER BEDROOM CLOSET ROOF AREA TO SHOW:
 1) HOW IS (2)2X WOOD LEDGER SHOWN ON
 ROOF PLAN ATTACHED TO WALL. SPECIFY ALL
 SIZES AND FASTENERS. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY
 AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.
 ***DETAIL IS INCOMPLETE AND IT DOESN'T
 MATCH ROOF FRAMING PLAN AND ELEVATIONS.
  
 E) FLAT ROOF SYSTEM DETAIL: SEE
 FLORIDA OR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR
 SELECTED FLAT ROOF SYSTEM. SEE IF
 SELECTED SYSTEM IS LIMITED BY GENERAL
 LIMITATION #7 OR #9. THEN, PROVIDE
 REQUIRED INFORMATION. DETAIL IS NOT
 REQUIRED. ONLY INFORMATION REQUIRED ON
 THE PRODUCT APPROVAL ITSELF.
 ***ENGINEER IS CONFUSING ROOF SHEATHING
 WITH RAS 117 CALCULATIONS FOR ROOF
 COVERING AT CORNER AND PERIMETER AREAS.
 SEE GENERAL LIMITATION #7 ON LAST PAGE
 OF THE NOA AND SUBMIT THE CALCULATIONS.
  
 F) WHERE IS THE STEEL COLUMN DETAIL
 TAKEN AT?. INFORMATION DOESN'T MATCH
 ROOF FRAMING PLAN.
  
 17- DRAWING #6: A) PROVIDE DETAIL/
 SECTION SHOWING HOW ARE NEW COLUMNS
 ATTACHED TO EXISTING ENTRY ROOF. SEC.
 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.
 ***NO DONE.
  
 B) WINDOW SECTION 5/A6: SEE SECTION
 R613.6.2 2004 RESIDENTIAL CODE FOR
 PROPER BUCK ATTACHMENT AND REVISE
 DETAIL AS REQUIRED.
 ***DETAIL WAS DELETED. PROVIDE DETAIL
 AND SEE COMMENTS ABOVE.
  
 C) WINDOWS ARE NOT DRAWN CORRECTLY.
 SHOW SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS AS SPECIFIED ON
 PLANS.
  
 18- DRAWING #7:
 A) WALL SECTION AA: 1) SHOW HOW IS
 CROSS VENTILATION ACHIEVED. SEC.R806
 2004 RESIDENTIAL CODE.
 ***SHOWING INSULATION ON THE EAVE? THIS
 IS BLOCKING THE VENTILATION. ALSO, THERE
 IS A (2)2X8 BEAM BLOCKING THE
 VENTILATION.
  
 B) CONCRETE TIE BEAM SHOWS ONLY 2 #5
 BARS. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
 ***TIE BEAM SIZE DOESN'T MATCH SCHEDULE.
  
 C) SPECIFY FASTENING TYPE AND SPACING
 OF 3/4 PLYWOOD ROOF SHEATHING. SEC.
 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.
 ***ENGINEER IS MIXING AND MATCHING ROOF
 SHEATHING WITH RAS 117 CALCULATIONS FOR
 FLAT ROOF BASE SHEET. REVISE AS REQ'D.
  
 D) WHERE IS SECTION AA TAKEN AT?.
 SHOW IT IN FLOOR/FOUNDATION PLAN TO
 VERIFY CONSISTENCY WITH PROPOSED
 CONSTRUCTION.
 ***KEYED WRONG ON FLOOR PLANS.
  
 E) PROVIDE ONLY THE DETAILS AND NOTES
 THAT APPLY TO THIS JOB.
  
 F) WALL SECTION AA: CLARIFY WHY IS
 THERE A NOTE SPECIFYING "MONOLITHIC
 CONCRETE SLAB AND FOOTING" IF THE
 DRAWING IS SHOWING A STEM WALL AND
 CONCRETE SLAB IS SEPARATED FROM THE
 FOOTING?.
  
 G) WALL SECTION 2/A8 DOESN'T MATCH
 ROOF FRAMING PLAN. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 H) **INTERIOR WALL FRAMING DETAILS
 CALL FOR 2X4 WALLS. FLOOR PLAN CALLS FOR
 6" PARTITIONS. REVISE/CLARIFY AS
 REQUIRED.
 **SHOW IN FLOOR PLAN WALLS THAT
 WILL HAVE THE R-19 INSULATION SHOWN ON
 DETAILS. **NOTE: R-19 DOESN'T WORK ON
 2X4 WALL. SEE MANUFACTURER SPECS.
  
 19- PLEASE RETURN REVIEWED SET AFTER
 CORRECTIONS ARE DONE TO THE ORIGINAL
 DRAWINGS TO EXPEDITE REVIEW PROCESS.
  
 20- PROVIDE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS
 REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 13 FBC 2004.
  
 21- SURVEY SUBMITTED SHOWS EXISTING
 PORCH WHERE PROPOSED FAMILY ROOM AND
 KITCHEN AREA ARE GOING TO BE. ENGINEER
 DRAWING #1 CALLS FOR NEW CONCRETE SLAB
 ON COMPACTED FILL. CLARIFY IF REMOVING
 EXISTING CONCRETE SLAB AND PROVIDING NEW
 COMPACTED FILL. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY
 AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.
  
 22- ALL DRAWINGS TO BE CLEAR AND
 LEGIBLE. SOME INFORMATION IS TO LIGHT
 AND BLURRY AND HARD TO READ. REVISE.
  
 JULIO GOMEZ
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 (561)805-6712
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2006-03-18 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2006-03-18 Time 15:55 Rev Time 4.00
Received By jgomez Date 2006-03-18 Time 12:14 Sent To  
Notes
2006-03-18 00:00:00BUILDING REVIEW CHECKLIST:
 1- PLANS SHOW WALL LEADING TO THE NEW
 KITCHEN AREA TO BE REMOVED. ACCORDING TO
 PALM BEACH COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISAL
 INFORMATION THIS IS A BEARING WALL.
 DRAWINGS DON'T SHOW ANY SPECIFICATIONS
 AND CONSIDERATION FOR REMOVAL OF BEARING
 WALL. NEED TO SHOW SHORING AND HOW IS
 EXISTING AND NEW STRUCTURE GOING TO BE
 SUPPORTED.
 ENGINEER TO PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND
 SPECIFICATIONS ADDRESSING THE STRUCTURAL
 STABILITY ISSUE. SECTION 106.1.2 OF CITY
 AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.
  
 2- NEED RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT.
  
 3- PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF PLANS, PRODUCT
 APPROVALS AND OTHER SUBMITTALS.
  
 4- AFTER ORIGINAL PLANS ARE REVISED BY
 THE ENGINEER, BRING THEM TO PALM BEACH
 COUNTY TO PAY IMPACT FEES. BRING BACK
 STAMPED DRAWINGS AND PAID RECEIPT.
  
 5- AS OF JANURARY 1ST 2006 ENGINEER
 NEEDS TO USE NEW SEAL AS REQUIRED
 BY FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE.
  
 6- A) MASTER BEDROOM SPECIFIED AWNING
 WINDOW DOESN'T COMPLY WITH EGRESS
 REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION R310 2004
 RESIDENTIAL CODE. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
 B) FAMILY ROOM WINDOW (MAY ALSO BE AN
 SLEEPING ROOM) DOESN'T COMPLY WITH
 SECT.R310 2004 RESIDENTIAL CODE. REVISE
 AS REQUIRED.
  
 7- A) PROVIDE FLORIDA OR LOCAL PRODUCT
 APPROVAL FOR STORM SHUTTERS AS REQUIRED
 BY RULE 9B-72 OF DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY
 AFFAIRS.
 B) PROVIDE KEY PLAN AND A COMPLETE
 INSTALLATION SCHEDULE FOR STORM
 SHUTTERS. SEE ATTACHED SAMPLE AND
 PROVIDE ALL THE REQUIRED INFORMATION.
 SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004
  
 8- PROVIDE FLORIDA OR LOCAL PRODUCT
 APPROVAL (REQ'D BY RULE 9B-72) FOR:
 A) FLAT ROOF SYSTEM (CLEARLY INDICATE
 WHICH OF THE APPROVED SYSTEMS IS GOING
 TO BE INSTALLED. CHECK IF LIMITATION #7
 OR #9 APPLIES AND PROVIDE REQUIRED
 INFORMATION).
 B) ALL STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS
 SPECIFIED ON PLANS. SEE PLANS & DETAILS.
 C) TYPE OF WINDOWS TO BE INSTALLED.
 D) EXTERIOR DOOR.
 E) CONCRETE LINTELS.
 F) WINDOW MULLIONS. SEE PLANS
  
 9- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND
 APPROVE IN WRITTING (TYPICALLY DONE BY
 USING THE STANDARD REVIEW STAMP) ALL
 PRODUCT APPROVALS PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO
 THIS OFFICE AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3
 OF CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.
  
 10- ENGINEER TO SPECIFY CONCRETE
 LINTELS. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO
 FBC 2004
  
 11- ENGINEER TO SPECIFY ON PLANS WHICH
 OPENINGS ARE LOCATED IN ZONE 4 AND ZONE
 5 TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH PRODUCT
 APPROVALS SUBMITTED. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY
 AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.
  
 12- PROVIDE STRUCTURAL BUCK DETAIL FOR
 EXTERIOR DOOR. SEE SECTION R613.6.2 OF
 2004 RESIDENTIAL CODE FOR PROPER WAY OF
 INSTALLING STRUCTURAL BUCK. ALSO, CHECK
 PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR REQUIRED BUCK SIZE.
  
 13- PROVIDE DETAIL/SECTION FOR STEEL
 COLUMN SHOWING CONNECTIONS AT TOP AND
 BOTTOM OR COLUMN. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY
 AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.
  
 14- SPECIFY ROOF CROSS VENTILATION AS
 REQUIRED BY SEC. R806 2004 RESIDENTIAL
 CODE.
  
 15- DRAWING #1: A) COLUMN C3 CALLS FOR 4
 # 5 VERTICAL BARS. FOUNDATION PLAN SHOWS
 ONLY 2. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
 B) REVISE SPACING FOR CONCRETE BLOCK
 VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT. SEE REINF. CELL
 SPLICEDETAIL ON DRAWING #7.
 C) SIZE OF FOOTING IN FOUNDATION
 SCHEDULE NOTES AND FOOTING SIZE ON WALL
 SECTION DON'T MATCH. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
 D) REVISE CONCRETE COVER FOR FOUNDATION
 BEAM. SEE ACI 318-02.
 E) SECTIONS AND DETAILS KEYED ON
 PLANS DON'T MATCH. COORDINATE ALL
 DETAILS AND SECTIONS AS REQUIRED.
 F) UPDATE REFERENCE FOR CONCRETE SLAB
 WIRE MESH SUPPORTS. SEE 2004 RESIDENTIAL
 CODE FOR PROPER REFERENCE.
 G) STRUCTURAL NOTES: SPECIFY CURRENT
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE EDITION FOR WHICH
 STRUCTURE IS DESIGNED (2004).
 H) PROVIDE ONLY THE DETAILS THAT
 APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. WHERE IS
 CONNECTOR SSTB16 GOING TO BE USED? AND
 HOW? SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC
 2004
 I) WHAT'S THE CONSTRUCTION OF
 EXTERIOR WALL AT MASTER BEDROOM CLOSET.
 THERE ARE NOT SPECS FOR COLUMNS, WALLS,
 BEAMS, ETC. PROVIDE COMPLETE
 INFORMATION. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY
 AMENDMETNS TO FBC 2004
  
 16- DRAWING #2: A) SPECIFY SAFETY GLASS
 FOR MASTER BATHROOM WINDOW. SEC. R308.4
 2004 RESIDENTIAL CODE.
 B) WIND LOAD DESIGN PARAMETERS:
 CLARIFY IF BUILDING IS DESIGNED AS
 ENCLOSED OR PARTIALLY ENCLOSED. SEC.
 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.
 C) HOW IS OPENING FOR DOOR TO BE
 REMOVED GOING TO BE ENCLOSED. SEC.
 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.
  
 17- DRAWING #3: A) PROVIDE ONLY THE
 DETAILS THAT APPLY TO THIS PROJECT.
 B) SHOW IN PLANS LOCATION OF BEAMS
 SPECIFIED ON THE BEAM SCHEDULE. SEC.
 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.
 C) SHOW ROOF SLOPE AND ORIENTATION.
 SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC
 2004.
 D) PROVIDE COMPLETE WALL SECTION AT
 MASTER BEDROOM CLOSET ROOF AREA TO SHOW:
 1) HOW IS (2)2X WOOD LEDGER SHOWN ON
 ROOF PLAN ATTACHED TO WALL. SPECIFY ALL
 SIZES AND FASTENERS. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY
 AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.
 2) CONNECTOR SPECIFIED ON DETAIL 2/A3
 IS A TENSION TIE. SHOW INSTALLATION AND
 HOW IS ROOF CONNECTION DESIGNED FOR
 UPLIFT LOADS. SEE CATALOGUE FOR PROPER
 CONNECTOR INSTALLATION AND USE.
 E) ROOF FRAMING PLAN SHOWS (2)2X WOOD
 MEMBERS AT THE WEST SIDE OF ROOF BY NEW
 KITCHEN AREA: 1) HOW IS CROSS
 VENTILATION ACHIEVED?
 2) SPECIFY SPACING OF MTSM20
 CONNECTOR.
 F) FLAT ROOF SYSTEM DETAIL: SEE
 FLORIDA OR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR
 SELECTED FLAT ROOF SYSTEM. SEE IF
 SELECTED SYSTEM IS LIMITED BY GENERAL
 LIMITATION #7 OR #9. THEN, PROVIDE
 REQUIRED INFORMATION. DETAIL IS NOT
 REQUIRED. ONLY INFRMATION REQUIRED ON
 THE PRODUCT APPROVAL ITSELF.
  
 18- DRAWING #6: A) MISSING SOUTH
 ELEVATION.
 B) EAST ELEVATION IS MISSING THE FLAT
 ROOF SYSTEM ABOVE MASTER BEDROOM CLOSET
 AREA. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
 C) PROVIDE COMPLETE SPECS FOR
 FASTENERS AND SPACING FOR ENTRY ROOF
 DETAIL. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS.
 D) PROVIDE DETAIL/SECTION SHOWING HOW
 ARE NEW COLUMNS ATTACHED TO EXISTING
 ENTRY ROOF. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS
 E) WINDOW SECTION 5/A6: SEE SECTION
 R613.6.2 2004 RESIDENTIAL CODE FOR
 PROPER BUCK ATTACHMENT AND REVISED
 DETAIL AS REQUIRED.
  
 19- DRAWING #7:
 A) WALL SECTION AA: 1) SHOW HOW IS
 CROSS VENTILATION ACHIEVED. SEC.R806
 2004 RESIDENTIAL CODE.
 B) CONCRETE TIE BEAM SHOWS ONLY 2 #5
 BARS. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
 C) SPECIFY FASTENING TYPE AND SPACING
 OF 3/4 PLYWOOD ROOF SHEATHING. SEC.
 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.
 D) WHERE IS THIS SECTION TAKEN AT?.
 SHOW IT IN FLOOR/FOUNDATION PLAN TO
 VERIFY CONSISTENCY WITH PROPOSED
 CONSTRUCTION.
 E) REVISE SIZE SPECS FOR DOWEL AT
 EXISTING FOUNDATION. SEE DWG FOR
 COMMENTS.
 F) WWM NOTE SAYS TO DOUBLE WWM AT
 STRESS POINTS. SHOW STRESS POINTS IN
 FOUNDATION PLAN. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY
 AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.
 G) CONNECTOR LTT20B IS SHOWN AT THE
 BOTTOM OF JOIST. DETAIL SHOWS
 INSTALLATION AT TOP OF JOIST. THIS IS A
 TENSION TIE CONNECTOR. PROVIDE COMPLETE
 ENGINEERING SHOWING WHY USING CONNECTOR
 AT BOTTOM. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS
 FBC 2004.
 H) GENERAL NOTES AND CONCRETE NOTES
 ARE NOT LEGIBLE. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
 I) PROVIDE ONLY THE DETAILS AND NOTES
 THAT APPLY TO THIS JOB.
  
 20- PLEASE RETURN REVIEWED SET AFTER
 CORRECTIONS ARE DONE TO THE ORIGINAL
 DRAWINGS TO EXPEDITE REVIEW PROCESS.
  
 JULIO GOMEZ
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 (561)805-6712
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2007-06-19 Cont ID  
Sent By btrobaug Date 2007-06-19 Time 15:25 Rev Time 0.00
Received By btrobaug Date 2007-06-19 Time 14:17 Sent To M
Notes
2007-06-19 15:18:26 
  
 DENIED/INCOMPLETE INFORMATION
  
 1} THERE IS A NOTE WITH THE CALCULATIONS THAT A "NEW
 200A SERVICE PROPOSED". SUBMIIT A RISER DIAGRAM PER
 215.5, AND PANEL SCHEDULE PER 408.4 (PLEASE SEE NEW
 VERBAGE),
  
 2} BATH CIRCUIT REQUIRED TO HAVE A 20 AMP RECEPTACLE
 PER 210.11(C) (3), LOCATED PER 210.52(D), AND BE GFI
 PROTECTED PER 210.8(A) (1).
  
 3}PER R313.1.1 SMOKE ALARMS SHALL BE LOCATED AS
 REQUIRED IN NEW DWELLINGS WHEN REPAIRS OR ADDITIONS
 REQUIRING A PERMIT OCCUR. SEE ARTICLE FOR COMPLETE
 TEXT.LOCATE ON PLAN.
  
 IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL.
  
 BILL TROBAUGH
 ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 561/805-6718
 [email protected]
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2007-06-19 Cont ID  
Sent By btrobaug Date 2006-10-12 Time 13:12 Rev Time 0.50
Received By btrobaug Date 2006-10-12 Time 12:52 Sent To P
Notes
2007-06-19 14:41:23 
  
  
 FAILED THIS PREVIOUSLY PASSED REVIEW DUE TO PLAN AND
 DESIGNER CHANGES, NEW NONCOMPLIANT PLANS
 SUBMITTED./WRT.
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2006-07-11 Cont ID  
Sent By btrobaug Date 2006-07-11 Time 11:04 Rev Time 1.00
Received By btrobaug Date 2006-07-11 Time 07:52 Sent To P
Notes
2006-07-11 00:00:00 
  
 NONCOMPLIANT
  
 PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS
 FOR CODE COMPLIANCE AND RESUBMIT FOR
 REVIEW.
  
 1} COMMENT #5 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW:
 5} INDICATE IF THE SERVICE IS EXISTING
 AND THE RATING. PLEASE SUBMIT A RISER
 DIAGRAM PER 215.5., SHOW HOW THE
 RELOCATED PANEL IS BEING FED.
 THE RESUBMITTED PLAN INDICATES A 150 AMP
 EXISTING SERVICE. THE RISER ON THAT PLAN
 INDICATES A 200 AMP SERVICE. PLEASE
 CORRECT AND INDICATE WHAT IS PROPOSED
 UNDER THE SCOPE OF THIS APPLICATION.
  
 2} THE REFRIGERATOR ON THE SCHEDULE IS
 1500 VA, AND 1200 VA IN THE CALC. PLEASE
 CORRELATE.
  
 3} THE SMALL APPLIANCE CIRCUITS IN THE
 CALCS AND ON THE SCHEDULE DO NOT
 CORRELATE.
  
 4} THE JACUZZI LISTED ON THE SCHEDULE IS
 NOT IN THE CALCULATIONS.
  
 5} THE CIRCUIT NUMBERS ON THE PLAN AND
 THE ONES ON THE PANEL SCHEDULE DO NOT
 CORRESPOND.
  
 6} A SMOKE DETECTOR IS REQUIRED OUTSIDE
 THE BEDROOM AS WELL AS INSIDE PER 313.1
 FBC. THIS DEVICE WAS ON THE PREVIOUS
 PLAN , BUT REMOVED ON THIS ONE.
  
 7} KITCHEN RECEPTACLES MUST COMPLY WITH
 210.52(B).
  
 8} THE ENGINEER OF RECORD MUST SEAL THE
 DOCUMENTS WITH A SEALACCEPTABLETO
 THE BOARD PER 61G15-23.001, AND
 ILLUSTRATED IN SAME.
  
 IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL.
  
 BILL TROBAUGH
 ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW
 561/805-6718
 [email protected]
 FAX/:561/659-8026
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2006-02-10 Cont ID  
Sent By btrobaug Date 2006-02-10 Time 11:09 Rev Time 0.75
Received By btrobaug Date 2006-02-10 Time 08:49 Sent To P
Notes
2006-02-10 00:00:00PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS
 FOR CODE COMPLIANCE AND RESUBMIT FOR
 REVIEW.
  
 1} THE LOAD CALCULATIONS AND THE PANEL
 SCHEDULE DO NOT MATCH. SEE OVEN, DRYER,
 REFRIGERATOR, A/C.
  
 2} THE OVEN LOAD FOR CALCULATION MUST BE
 A MINIMUM OF 8KW PER 220.19
  
 3} THE DRYER MINIMUM LOAD IS 5KW PER
 220.18.
  
 4} THE BATH CIRCUIT ON THE PANEL
 SCHEDULE INDICATES A 15 AMP CIRCUIT.
 20AMPS IS REQUIRED PER 210.11(C)(3).
  
 5} INDICATE IF THE SERVICE IS EXISTING
 AND THE RATING. PLEASE SUBMIT A RISER
 DIAGRAM PER 215.5., SHOW HOW THE
 RELOCATED PANEL IS BEING FED.
  
 6} 210.52(C)(3)- PENINSULAR COUNTER
 SPACES. AT LEAST ONE RECEPTACLE OUTLET
 SHALL BE INSTALLED AT EACH PENINSULAR
 COUNTER SPACE WITH A LONG DIMENSION OF
 600 MM (24 IN.) OR GREATER AND A SHORT
 DIMENSION OF 300 MM (12 IN.) OR GREATER.
 A PENINSULAR COUNTERTOP IS MEASURED FROM
 THE CONNECTING EDGE.
  
 7} A SMOKE DETECTOR IS REQUIRED IN THE
 MASTER BEDROOM PER 313.1 FBC.
  
 PLEASE NOTE THAT TWO SETS OF PLANS ARE
 REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW PER
 106.1 FBC.
  
 IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASER CALL.
  
  
 BILL TROBAUGH
 ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW
 561/805-6718
 [email protected]
 FAX/:561/659-8026
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 9 Status N Date 2007-06-13 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2007-06-13 Time 12:07 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2007-06-13 Time 12:07 Sent To Z
Notes
2007-06-13 12:08:33TO "Z" BOX/RESUB--NEW SHEETS FOR Z>E>P>
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 8 Status N Date 2007-02-15 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2007-02-15 Time 10:52 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2007-02-15 Time 10:52 Sent To M
Notes
2007-02-15 10:52:37TO "M" BOX/RESUB
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 7 Status N Date 2007-02-12 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2007-02-12 Time 09:37 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2007-02-12 Time 09:37 Sent To Z
Notes
2007-02-12 09:38:25TO "Z" BOX/RESUB
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 6 Status N Date 2006-10-10 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2006-10-10 Time 19:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2006-10-10 Time 19:48 Sent To E
Notes
2006-10-10 19:50:53TO "BTROBAUGH" DESK/RESUB
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 5 Status N Date 2006-10-04 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2006-10-04 Time 11:20 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2006-10-04 Time 11:20 Sent To Z
Notes
2006-10-04 00:00:00TO "Z" BOX/RESUB
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 4 Status N Date 2006-07-08 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2006-07-08 Time 15:53 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2006-07-08 Time 15:53 Sent To E
Notes
2006-07-08 00:00:00TO "BTROBAUG" DESK/RESUB
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2006-06-30 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2006-06-30 Time 12:32 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2006-06-30 Time 12:32 Sent To Z
Notes
2006-06-30 00:00:00TO "Z" BOX/RESUB
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2006-02-08 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2006-02-08 Time 09:53 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2006-02-08 Time 09:53 Sent To E
Notes
2006-02-08 00:00:00TO "E" BOX
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2006-03-18 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2006-03-18 Time 19:07 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2006-02-01 Time 17:51 Sent To  
Notes
2006-02-01 00:00:00TO "Z" BOX-ONLY ONE COPY OF PLANS
 SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2007-06-19 Cont ID  
Sent By tgordon Date 2007-06-19 Time 15:57 Rev Time 0.30
Received By tgordon Date 2007-06-19 Time 15:57 Sent To P
Notes
2007-06-19 16:05:18*** DENIED ***
 1) AS REQUESTED IN LAST REVIEW 2-16-07 NOTE #1. PLEASE
 SUBMIT MANUAL J CALCULATIONS LONG FORM NOT JUST THE
 COVER SHEET, PER 2004 FBC 13-607.1.ABC.1 .
  
 2) ONLY ONE COPY OF ENERGY CALCULATIONS WAS SUBMITTED,
 TWO COPY NEED TO BE SUBMITTED, PLEASE CORRECT.
  
 3)ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE SIGNED BY
 OWNER/AGENT ALSO, PER 2004 FBC 13-600.3.ABC.2.
  
 4) MECHANICAL PLANS NEED TO BE SIGNED BY THE DESIGNER.
 ALL INFORMATION, DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS AND
 ACCOMPANYING DATA SHALL BEAR THE PRINTED NAME AND
 SIGNATURE OF THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN. PER
 FBC 104.2.1 .
  
 5) SEE ATTACHED NOTICE FS 553.80(2)(B) REGARDING FOUR
 TIMES THE FEE.
  
 MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY;
 TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729.
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2007-02-16 Cont ID  
Sent By tgordon Date 2007-02-16 Time 15:03 Rev Time 0.30
Received By tgordon Date 2007-02-16 Time 15:03 Sent To B
Notes
2007-02-16 15:04:10*** DENIED ***
 1) PLEASE SUBMIT ENERGY CALCULATIONS, PER 2004 FBC
 13-101.2.2.
  
 2) PLEASE SUBMIT MANUAL J CALCULATIONS LONG FORM NOT
 JUST THE COVER SHEET, PER 2004 FBC 13-607.1.ABC.1 .
  
 MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY;
 TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729.
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2007-02-16 Cont ID  
Sent By tgordon Date 2006-02-10 Time 13:37 Rev Time 0.15
Received By tgordon Date 2006-02-10 Time 13:37 Sent To B
Notes
2006-02-10 00:00:00NO MECH. PLANS SUBMITTED, OR MECH.
 PERMIT NO. APPLIED FOR AT THIS TIME.
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2007-07-02 Cont ID  
Sent By jleech Date 2007-07-02 Time 13:12 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jleech Date 2007-07-02 Time 13:11 Sent To B
Notes
2007-07-02 13:18:04DENIED;
 NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION. A SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM IS
 REQUIRED, FBC-2004 BUILDING SECTION 106.3.5.1.3. SHOW
 ALL PIPE SIZES, VENTS AND LOCATION OF SEWER.
 PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW BY;
 JOHN LEECH
 805-6695
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2006-10-21 Cont ID  
Sent By btrobaug Date 2007-06-19 Time 14:38 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jleech Date 2006-10-21 Time 13:37 Sent To B
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2006-07-17 Cont ID  
Sent By jleech Date 2006-07-17 Time 10:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jleech Date 2006-07-17 Time 10:48 Sent To B
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2006-02-10 Cont ID  
Sent By jleech Date 2006-02-10 Time 12:33 Rev Time 0.50
Received By jleech Date 2006-02-10 Time 12:33 Sent To M
Notes
2006-02-10 00:00:00DENIED;
 1. IF BUILDING DRAIN IS OUT SIDE THE
 UNIT CLEANOUTS WILL BE REQUIRED ON
 TOILET DRAIN AND TUB DRAIN. SEE ONE SET
 OF DRAWINGS MARKED IN RED.
 2. PLEASE REMOVE, PLUMBING NOTES 2,3,
 AND 4. NOTE 5.COPPER UNDER SLAB WILL BE
 "L" COPPER, GALV. WATER PIPING CAN NOT
 BE INSTALLED UNDER GROUND BECAUSE OF
 CORROSION.
 PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW BY;
 JOHN LEECH
 805-6695
 TWO SETS OF PLANS ARE REQUIRED.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 5 Status F Date 2007-06-15 Cont ID  
Sent By choops Date 2007-06-15 Time 10:19 Rev Time 0.00
Received By choops Date 2007-06-15 Time 10:19 Sent To E
Notes
2007-06-15 10:29:40***FAILED***
  
  
 1)PLEASE INDICATE ALL SETBACK DIMENSIONS ON THE
 SURVEYS FROM THE PROPOSED ADDITIONS TO THE PROPERTY
 LINES.
  
 2)THE PROPOSED REAR ADDITION IS PERMISSABLE ONLY
 WITH A REAR SETBACK DIMENSION OF 6.4' . THE CORNER
 ADDITION IS PERMISSABLE ONLY WITH A FRONT SETBACK OF
 25' AND A SIDE SETBACK OF 9'.THE PROPOSED FRONT PORCH
 IS NOT PERMISSABLE...IT INCREASES THE NON-CONFORMITY
 (THE HOUSE ALREADY DOES NOT MEET THE FRONT SETBACK
 REQUIREMENT OF 25')
  
 3)SHOW PROPOSED DRIVEWAY DIMENSIONS IN DETAIL.
  
 4)PROVIDE THE VOIDED, PREVIOUSLY STAMPED PLANS.
  
  
 CHRIS HOOPS
 ZONING TECHNICIAN
 561-805-6720
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2007-02-14 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 2007-02-14 Time 11:58 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 2007-02-14 Time 11:58 Sent To I
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2006-10-10 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 2006-10-10 Time 15:06 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 2006-10-10 Time 15:06 Sent To I
Notes
2006-10-10 15:09:23***FAILED***
  
 1) ON THE SITE PLAN, THE DIMENSION FROM FRONT PROPERTY
 LINE TO THE NEW ADDITION NEEDS TO BE SHOWN, NOT FROM
 THE CURB.
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT JOHN ROACH, SENIOR
 PLANNER, AT (561) 822-1435.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2006-07-07 Cont ID  
Sent By mmclean Date 2006-07-07 Time 13:52 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mmclean Date 2006-07-07 Time 13:52 Sent To I
Notes
2006-07-07 00:00:00DENIED,
 1. SITEPLAN SHOWS THE 25FT FROM SETBACK
 FROM THE CITY ROW. THE PROPOSED WORK
 MUST BE 25FT FROM THE FRONT PROPERTY
 LINE.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2006-02-07 Cont ID  
Sent By mmclean Date 2006-02-07 Time 13:31 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mmclean Date 2006-02-07 Time 13:31 Sent To I
Notes
2006-02-07 00:00:00DENIED,
 1. MUST PROVIDE TWO COPY OF CURRENT
 SURVEY SHOWING THE EXISTING STRUCTURE
 WITH SETBACKS.
 2. ONLY ONE SET OF PLANS PROVIDED, MUST
 PROVIDE TWO COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS.
  
  
 MICHELLE MCLEAN
 ZONING TECHNICIAN
 805-6720


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved