| 2006-08-03 00:00:00 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | ****CONVERTED TO PERMIT; FIRST PERMIT |
| | PLAN REVIEW **** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | EXISTING BUILDING CODE |
| | FBC*CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENT, 8/24/06 |
| | |
| | AFTER REVIEW OF THE DRAFT OF THE REVISED |
| | HAZARD ANALYSIS, OCCUPANCY |
| | CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PROCESSING AREA |
| | AND SLUDGE CAKE STORAGE AREA ARE H2. |
| | PLEASE REVISE PLANS ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | |
| | COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW, EITHER |
| | NOT ADDRESSED OR REQUIRING FURTHER |
| | CLARIFICATION; NUMBERING REMAINING THE |
| | SAME FOR CONSISTENCY: |
| | |
| | 1.)IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM |
| | BEACH COUNTY.THE PLANS MUST BE STAMPED |
| | AND THE RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE |
| | APPLICATION, 561-233-5025, 2300 NORTH |
| | JOG ROAD, SUITE 2W01. |
| | |
| | 2.)PROVIDE A SOILS INVESTIGATION |
| | REPORT FBC1802.2.THE SOILS REPORT |
| | PROVIDED WAS A PHOTOCOPY.ALL DOCUMENTS |
| | PREPARED BY AN ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED |
| | FOR PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE SIGNED, |
| | SEALED, DATED ORIGINALS FAC61G15-23. |
| | PROVIDE THREE ORIGINALS.HAS THE |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD REVIEWED THE SOILS |
| | REPORT? |
| | |
| | 3.)THREE COPIES OF ALL PERMIT |
| | DOCUMENTS REQUIRED, SEE ITEM 4 BELOW. |
| | THIS IS TO BE DONE ON EVERY SUBMITTAL, |
| | ALL DOCUMENTS, AS CODE COMPLIANT |
| | DOCUMENTS ARE STAMPED BY THE INDIVIDUAL |
| | TRADES.FAILURE TO SUBMIT THREE COPIES |
| | EVERY SUBMITTAL RESULTS IN REVIEWERS WHO |
| | MAY HAVE ALREADY PASSED THEIR REVIEWS |
| | BEING REQUIRED TO REVIEW THE PLANS AGAIN |
| | TO STAMP THE NEW SHEETS. |
| | |
| | 4.) FBC* 109.3.7RESIDENT INSPECTOR. |
| | SUBMIT INSPECTOR RESUME' AND LICENSE |
| | DOCUMENTS TO HAROLD PISKURA, DIRECTOR OF |
| | THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR PROGRAM.A |
| | RESIDENT INSPECTOR PROGRAM IS REQUIRED, |
| | ON THIS PROJECT, DUE TO ONE OR MORE OF |
| | THE FOLLOWING: |
| | - BUILDINGS/ADDITIONS OF TYPE I OR II |
| | CONSTRUCTION |
| | - ANY MAJOR STRUCTURAL ALTERATIONS |
| | - STRUCTURES IN WHICH THE CONCRETE |
| | DESIGN IS BASED ON COMPRESSIVE |
| | STRENGTH (F'C) IN EXCESS OF 3000 PSI |
| | - PILE DRIVING |
| | - BUILDINGS OVER 20,000 SQFT IN AREA |
| | - BUILDINGS OVER 2 STORIES IN HEIGHT |
| | - BUILDING/STRUCTURES OF UNUSUAL DESIGN |
| | OR METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION |
| | |
| | ALSO, PLEASE ARRANGE WITH HAROLD PISKURA |
| | (INSPECTION SERVICES MANAGER - TEL: |
| | 561 805 6711), A MEETING INVOLVING THE |
| | OWNER, RESIDENT INSPECTOR, JOB |
| | INSPECTOR, CONTRACTOR AND ENGINEER. |
| | |
| | THE RESPONSE THAT THIS WILL BE DONE IS |
| | ACKNOWLEDGED.THIS IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO |
| | PERMIT ISSUANCE. |
| | |
| | 5-6.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 7.) FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW; NOT COMPLETELY |
| | ADDRESSED.ALSO SEE NEW COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED |
| | ABOUT THE MATERIALS PROCESSED AND THE |
| | END PRODUCT TO DETERMINE THE CORRECT SUB |
| | CLASSIFICATION.PROVIDE INFORMATION |
| | ABOUT THE QUANTITY OF MATERIALS USED IN |
| | PROCESSING, FLAMMABLE GASES PRODUCED, |
| | AND THE END PRODUCT AS RELATED TO |
| | OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION.SEE ALSO |
| | FBC307.8 REGARDING MULTIPLE HAZARDS, AND |
| | NFPA 820 1.3.5, MATERIALS USED FOR ANTI |
| | CORROSION WHICH MAY CAUSE ACCELERATED |
| | BURNING. |
| | |
| | IN ORDER TO ASSIST IN DETERMINING |
| | CORRECT OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION, PLEASE |
| | ADDRESS THIS ITEM IN A SIGNED, SEALED |
| | AND DATED LETTER FROM ONE OF THE DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONALS WITH THE ASSOCIATED |
| | DOCUMENTATION, INCLUDING MSDS IF |
| | AVAILABLE. |
| | |
| | THE HAZARD ANALYSIS DOES NOT ADDRESS |
| | QUANTITIES OF HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS USED |
| | IN THE PROCESSING AREA.SEE ALSO OTHER |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | 8.)REVISE OTHER ITEMS A01, CODE |
| | SUMMARY WHICH ARE AFFECTED BY THE |
| | OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION AND REVISE |
| | PLANS ACCORDINGLY (BUILDING HEIGHT AND |
| | AREA, OCCUPANT LOAD, ETC.).NOTE THAT |
| | DUE TO A LACK OF A CORRECT OCCUPANCY |
| | CLASSIFICATION A COMPLETE CHECKLIST |
| | CANNOT BE PROVIDED AT THIS TIME. |
| | |
| | 9.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 10.)CODE COMPLIANCE WITH FBC TABLE |
| | 503, CANNOT BE DETERMINED WITHOUT THE |
| | CORRECT OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION.IF |
| | YOU ARE USING AN AREA INCREASE, PROVIDE |
| | CALCULATIONS FBC506. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW - PLEASE INCORPORATE THE |
| | CALCULATIONS INTO THE PLAN AFTER AN |
| | OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION HAS BEEN AGREED |
| | UPON. |
| | |
| | 11.)PROVIDE MSDS FOR EACH MATERIAL |
| | USED FOR PROCESSING AND FOR THE END |
| | PRODUCT.PLEASE PROVIDE IN A MORE |
| | ORGANIZED FORMAT; PREFERABLY COLLATED, |
| | TABBED AND BOUND RATHER THAN OVER A |
| | HUNDRED LOOSE SHEETS OF PAPER. |
| | |
| | 12.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 13.)SHOW THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE |
| | FBC11-4.1.2(1).NOT ADDRESSED."AT |
| | LEAST ONE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE COMPLYING |
| | WITH SECTION 11-4.3 SHALL BE PROVIDED |
| | WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OF THE SITE FROM |
| | PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION STOPS . . . AND |
| | PUBLIC STREETS OR SIDEWALKS, TO AN |
| | ACCESSIBLE BUILDING ENTRANCE." |
| | |
| | 14.)PROVIDE FIRE SPRINKLER PLANS, |
| | FBC*106.3.5.1.1(5).YOUR RESPONSE THAT |
| | DETAILED DRAWINGS WILL BE DEVELOPED BY |
| | THE CONTRACTOR IS ACKNOWLEDGED.THEY |
| | WERE NOT INCLUDED IN THIS SUBMITTAL. |
| | SEE FBC*106.3.5.1.1(5), FS553.79(2), AND |
| | THE ATTACHED LETTER OF CLARIFICATION |
| | FROM FLORIDA DCA.FIRE SPRINKLER PLANS |
| | ARE REQUIRED TO BE A PART OF THE ISSUED |
| | PERMIT PACKAGE. |
| | |
| | 15.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 16.)THE LIFE SAFETY PLAN PROVIDED |
| | APPEARS NONCOMPLIANT DUE TO THE |
| | OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION OF F3 |
| | DISCREPANCY WITH THE STATEMENTS IN THE |
| | HAZARD ANALYSIS REGARDING AMOUNTS OF |
| | CHEMICALS STORED H4 AND DEFLAGRATION |
| | HAZARD FBC307.4. WITH AN OCCUPANCY |
| | CLASSIFICATION OF H, TRAVEL DISTANCES |
| | SHOWN AND THE COMMON PATH OF TRAVEL |
| | WOULD BE NONCOMPLIANT. |
| | |
| | ALSO, NOTE THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | A. INCLUDE THE CATWALKS IN THE LIFE |
| | SAFETY PLAN, SHOWING TRAVEL DISTANCES |
| | AND COMMON PATH OF TRAVEL. |
| | |
| | B. THERE IS A DISTANCE SHOWN OF 210FT |
| | FROM STAIR 5.USE THE WORST CASE FOR |
| | TRAVEL DISTANCE.THE COMMON PATH OF |
| | TRAVEL APPEARS TO BE OVER 100' WHICH |
| | WOULD BE THE REQUIREMENT FOR F3.H |
| | OCCUPANCY COMMON PATH OF TRAVEL IS NOT |
| | TO EXCEED EITHER 25' OR 75', DEPENDING |
| | ON SUB CLASSIFICATION. A TRAVEL DISTANCE |
| | OF 256FT IS SHOWN FOR |
| | THE SLUDGE STORAGE.IT IS NOT CLEAR WHY |
| | IT WAS MEASURED THIS WAY; IT APPEARS TO |
| | BE THE DISTANCE FROM ONE END OF THE AREA |
| | AND GOING IN AROUND THE PERIMETER TO THE |
| | OTHER SIDE. |
| | |
| | C. THE EGRESS PATH FOR THE SLUDGE |
| | STORAGE TERMINATES AT A DOOR STAIR 3 |
| | WHICH IS LABELED EXIT.SEE THE |
| | DEFINITION OF EXIT, FBC1002.THIS DOOR |
| | LEADS TO THE MAIN PROCESSING AREA.AS |
| | THERE ARE CURRENTLY NO EXIT COMPONENTS |
| | OTHER THAN DOORS LEADING TO THE OUTSIDE |
| | ON THE FIRST FLOOR, THE PATH OF TRAVEL |
| | SHOULD BE MEASURED FROM THE FARTHEST |
| | POINT TO THE EXIT DISCHARGE. |
| | |
| | D. IT IS NOT CLEAR IF THE TWO EXITS FOR |
| | THE SLUDGE STORAGE COMPLY WITH |
| | FBC1014.2.1(2).PROVIDE DIMENSIONS. |
| | |
| | E. FROM THE BUSINESS AREA FROM THE 2ND |
| | FLOOR, ONE EXIT IS SHOWN AS GOING |
| | THROUGH THE PROCESSING AREA.SEE |
| | FBC1013.2 REGARDING ADJOINING AREAS AND |
| | REGARDING H OCCUPANCY.IF THE OCCUPANCY |
| | IS DETERMINED TO BE F3 RATHER THAN H, |
| | THIS NOT ACCESSORY TO THE AREA SERVED, |
| | IT IS A MIXED OCCUPANCY.THE OTHER EXIT |
| | TRAVEL DISTANCE TERMINATES AT THE DOOR |
| | AT THE LANDING, BUT THIS IS NOT AN EXIT |
| | AS THE STAIR IS NOT PROTECTED, SEE |
| | FBC1002, FBC1015.2, FBC1015.1. |
| | |
| | F. EXITING THROUGH THE DEWATERING AREA |
| | APPEARS TO GO THROUGH EQUIPMENT. |
| | GENERALLY EGRESS PATH IS SHOWN AROUND |
| | THE PERIMETER OF A ROOM.PLEASE REVISE |
| | OR CLARIFY. |
| | |
| | G. WILL THE MECHANICAL ROOM HAVE LOCKS? |
| | SEE FBC1013.2 AND NOTE ON THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | H. UPPER LEVEL PLAN 47 & 50'6" SHOWS A |
| | MEZZANINE ON THE RIGHT.PROVIDE SQUARE |
| | FOOT OF THIS AREA. |
| | |
| | I.PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION IN REGARDS |
| | TO EGRESS FROM THE PROCESSING AREA.IT |
| | IS NOT CLEAR WHERE THE PATH OF TRAVEL |
| | WILL BE; WHAT EQUIPMENT IS AT GROUND |
| | LEVEL AND WHAT EQUIPMENT IS RAISED, |
| | ALLOWING AN EGRESS PATH BELOW?COMMON |
| | PATH OF TRAVEL AND PATH OF TRAVEL CANNOT |
| | BE DETERMINED FROM THE INFORMATION |
| | PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 17.)IT APPEARS THAT THE SLUDGE STORAGE |
| | AREAS TRAVEL DISTANCES EXCEED THE COMMON |
| | PATH OF TRAVEL FBC1013.3, TRAVEL |
| | DISTANCE FBC TABLE 1015.ON THE LIFE |
| | SAFETY PLAN, CLEARLY SHOW EXITING FOR |
| | EACH AREA. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW - NOT ADDRESSED; SEE ATTACHED |
| | COMMENTARY IN REGARDS TO COMMON PATH OF |
| | TRAVEL.SHOW COMMON PATH OF TRAVEL FOR |
| | ALL AREAS AS WELL AS THE TRAVEL |
| | DISTANCE.CODE COMPLIANCE CANNOT BE |
| | DETERMINED UNTIL CORRECT OCCUPANCY |
| | CLASSIFICATION IS ESTABLISHED. |
| | |
| | 18-19.) ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 20.)IT IS NOT CLEAR WHAT THE USE OF |
| | THE AREA WITH EQUIPMENT BS302, BS302, |
| | F301, F302 IS FOR.PLEASE CLARIFY.IT |
| | DOES NOT APPEAR ON THE MATERIAL FLOW |
| | SHEETS OR ON OTHER SECTIONS. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW - YOUR RESPONSE IN THE |
| | RESPONSE LETTER IS ACKNOWLEDGED.PLEASE |
| | INCORPORATE INTO THE PLAN AS THE |
| | RESPONSE LETTER WILL NOT BE A PART OF |
| | THE PERMIT PACKAGE. |
| | |
| | 21.)2ND REVIEW, RESPONSE LETTER STATES |
| | THAT THE MEZZANINE COMPLIES WITH |
| | FBC505.4(2).SEE ABOVE COMMENT IN |
| | REGARDS TO THE TWO MEANS OF EGRESS.ONE |
| | GOES THROUGH AN ADJOINING SPACE, AND THE |
| | OTHER IS NOT AN EXIT TO THE OUTSIDE AS |
| | IT GOES THROUGH A STAIRCASE WHICH IS NOT |
| | PROTECTED.SEE ALSO THE ATTACHED |
| | COMMENTARY. |
| | |
| | A MEZZANINE IS TO BE LOCATED IN A ROOM. |
| | AS THE AREA BELOW AND AREA ABOVE ARE |
| | BOTH ENCLOSED, THIS PORTION IS TWO |
| | STORIES.SEE THE DEFININTIONS FOR |
| | MEZZANINE AND STORY.THIS IS NOT |
| | LOCATED BETWEEN THE FLOOR BELOW AND THE |
| | CEILING ABOVE AS THE CEILING ABOVE THE |
| | SLUDGE STORAGE ROOM (WHICH HAS A WALL) |
| | IS THE 2ND FLOOR.THIS AREA IS TWO |
| | STORIES, NOT A MEZZANINE, BY DEFINITION. |
| | |
| | 22.)PROVIDE DESIGN CRITERIA FOR |
| | INTERIOR FINISH CLASSIFICATION, FBC |
| | TABLE 803.5. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT |
| | THIS IS FOUND IN THE CODE INVESTIGATION |
| | REPORT.PLEASE INCORPORATE INTO THE |
| | PLAN. |
| | |
| | 23.)PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR |
| | COMPONENTS AND CLADDING.ALL PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS ARE TO BE REVIEWED BY DESIGNER |
| | OF RECORD FBC*106.3.3. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW - ONLY ONE SET SUBMITTED, |
| | THREE REQUIRED.HAVE THEM REVIEWED BY |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD FBC*106.3.3.THIS |
| | MAY BE DONE WITH A LETTER REFERRING TO |
| | EACH PRODUCT APPROVAL OR WITH A SHOP |
| | DRAWING STAMP. |
| | |
| | ALSO, PLEASE CORRECT THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | A. FL3011-R1, SELECT THE APPROVED |
| | ASSEMBLY YOU WILL USE. |
| | THIS WILL BE ISSUED WITH A PROVISO THAT |
| | IT WILL BE INSTALLED BY A CONTRACTOR |
| | APPROVED BY BARRETT AS PER NOA |
| | LIMITATIONS (INFORMATIONAL ONLY). |
| | |
| | B. FL4911, SELECT THE APPROVED ASSEMBLY |
| | YOU WILL USE. |
| | |
| | C. FL617-R1 OR FL206, SELECT THE |
| | APPROVED ASSEMBLY YOU WILL USE.BOTH |
| | NUMBERS HAVE BEEN INCLUDED FOR THE |
| | MODIFIED SYSTEMS; BOTH ARE FOR GAF BUT |
| | ONLY ONE NUMBER SHOULD BE FOR NOA |
| | 03-0430.13. |
| | |
| | D. NOA 01-0129.17, TRI-PLY MODIFIED, NOA |
| | IS EXPIRED.NO FLORIDA STATE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL WAS PROVIDED, BUT TWO DIFFERENT |
| | NUMBERS WERE PROVIDED FOR GAF. |
| | |
| | E. VALUEGUARD ALUMINUM SOFFIT, IS THIS |
| | INTERIOR?IF THIS IS EXTERIOR, PROVIDE |
| | FLORIDA STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL, INDICATE |
| | WHERE THIS WILL BE INSTALLED AT IT |
| | APPEARS THAT THE BUILDING DOES NOT HAVE |
| | A SOFFIT, AND SPECIFY DESIGN PRESSURES. |
| | |
| | F. THE PRODUCT APPROVALS PROVIDED ARE |
| | FOR DOOR SKINS, NONIMPACT RATED, RATHER |
| | THAN DOOR ASSEMBLIES. |
| | |
| | G. THE INDEX SHEET TITLED "FLORIDA |
| | (MIAMI-DADE) PRODUCT APPROVAL DATA |
| | SHEETS" HAS OTHER DOORS LISTED BUT NO |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED.NO |
| | COMPLIANT PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE |
| | SUBMITTED FOR EXTERIOR DOORS.PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS FOR INTERIOR DOORS ARE NOT |
| | REQUIRED; IF ANY DOORS LISTED ARE |
| | INTERIOR, PLEASE REMOVE FROM THE LIST. |
| | |
| | H. NOA 03-1015.03, OVERHEAD DOOR, 10' |
| | ROLLING STEEL DOOR, THE NOA PROVIDED IS |
| | INCOMPLETE.THE SHEET WITH THE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES DID NOT PRINT PROPERLY.I |
| | HAVE PRINTED A NEW ONE FROM |
| | WWW.MIAMIDADE.GOV (FIND A DEPARTMENT, |
| | BUILDING CODE COMPLIANCE, PRODUCT |
| | CONTROL SEARCH).WHEN RESUBMITTING, |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE ONLY COMPLETE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS.TWO DIFFERENT FLORIDA STATE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE REFERENCED; WHICH |
| | IS THE CORRECT ONE FOR THIS PRODUCT? |
| | |
| | I. NOA 03-0929.05, JANUS INTERNATIONAL, |
| | OVERHEAD DOOR, PRODUCT APPROVAL IS NOT |
| | COMPLETE AND THE DESIGN PRESSURES ARE |
| | NOT COMPLIANT FOR ZONE 5 FOR THE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER ON |
| | SHEET S01.WHERE WILL THIS DOOR BE |
| | INSTALLED? |
| | |
| | J. NOA 03-0325.03, COOKSON, OVERHEAD |
| | DOOR, PRODUCT APPROVAL IS NOT COMPLETE. |
| | NO FLORIDA STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBER |
| | WAS PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | K. NOA 02-1231.02, CORNELL IRON WORKS, |
| | 20FT ROLLING DOOR, THE PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | IS EXPIRED.NO FLORIDA STATE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL NUMBER WAS PROVIDED.THE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL IS NOT COMPLETE. |
| | |
| | L. FOUR DIFFERENT NOAS FOR OVERHEAD |
| | DOORS WERE SUBMITTED.ARE YOU |
| | INSTALLING ALL OF THEM OR ARE THEY |
| | OPTIONS? |
| | |
| | M. NOA 02-0124.02, TRACO WINDOW, TWO |
| | DIFFERENT FLORIDA STATE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS WERE PROVIDED.WHICH ONE IS |
| | FOR THIS PRODUCT? |
| | |
| | N. FL2670, PEERLESS, FIXED WINDOW, |
| | PROVIDE THE INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS |
| | AND INDICATE WHICH PRODUCT YOU ARE |
| | USING.PROVIDE OTHER DOCUMENTATION |
| | (SUCH AS EVALUATION REPORT) FROM THE |
| | STATE WEBSITE IF AVAILABLE.THE FLORIDA |
| | STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL IS EXPIRED, 2001 |
| | CODE RATHER THAN 2004 CODE.NOTE THAT |
| | AS THIS IS BY CERTIFICATION MARK OR |
| | LISTING NO DESIGN PRESSURES WERE |
| | REVIEWED. |
| | |
| | O. GREENHECK NOAS (00-0929.13, |
| | 02-0415.09, 03-0422.05) FOR THE WALL |
| | LOUVERS, ALL ARE INCOMPLETE.SOME PAGES |
| | DID NOT PRINT PROPERLY. |
| | |
| | P. NOA 03-1001.01, THE PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | IS INCOMPLETE.THE DRAWING IS MISSING. |
| | THE DESIGN PRESSURE IS USUALLY ON THIS |
| | PAGE AS WELL AS SIZE LIMITATIONS.THE |
| | ELEVATIONS REFER TO A LOUVER SYSTEM |
| | ONLY, NO STRUCTURAL INFORMATION GIVEN |
| | FOR THE LOUVER WALL ABOVE THE ROOF. |
| | |
| | Q. APPENDIX I AND II, PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | LISTS WERE SUBMITTED.PLEASE REMOVE AS |
| | NOT ALL PRODUCTS ARE TO BE INSTALLED ON |
| | THIS JOB. |
| | |
| | R. PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE NOT PROVIDED |
| | FOR THE WALL PANELS AND ROOF PANELS FOR |
| | THE CHEMICAL STORAGE STRUCTURE. |
| | |
| | 24.)ACCESSIBLE ROUTE REQUIRED |
| | CONNECTING ALL ACCESSIBLE SPACES, |
| | FBC11-4.1.3(1).NOTE THAT THERE IS NO |
| | ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM THE SLUDGE |
| | RECEIVING AREA 109 TO THE SLUDGE |
| | RECEIVING 108, TO THE MAIN PROCESSING |
| | AREA 107, ELEVATOR AT LANDING 101.SEE |
| | ALSO FBC11-4.1.1(1)(3) REGARDING WORK |
| | AREAS. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW ? YOUR RESPONSE THAT IT WOULD |
| | BE IMPRACTICABLE TO MAKE THE REFERENCED |
| | AREAS ACCESSIBLE IS NOTED.THE |
| | REQUIREMENT OF VERTICAL ACCESSIBILITY |
| | FBC11-4.1.2 (HIGHLIGHTED IN GREY IN THE |
| | CODE BOOK) IS A FLORIDA SPECIFIC CODE |
| | REQUIREMENT.WAIVERS FROM THE CODE CAN |
| | BE GRANTED THROUGH APPLICATION TO THE |
| | STATE OF FLORIDA.SEE FBC11, SECTION C. |
| | |
| | |
| | ALSO SEE |
| | HTTP://WWW.DCA.STATE.FL.US/FBC/ |
| | /COMMITTEES/ACCESSIBILITY/AAC/1_AAC.HTM |
| | |
| | 25.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 26 - 29.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 30.)PROVIDE DETAILS FOR THE UL |
| | ASSEMBLIES SPECIFIED. |
| | |
| | 31.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 32.)YOUR RESPONSE THAT NO SEPARATE |
| | PERMITS WILL BE REQUIRED IS |
| | ACKNOWLEDGED.PROVIDE ALL STRUCTURAL |
| | INFORMATION AT THIS TIME FOR THESE |
| | ITEMS, INCLUDING THE DUSTROL TANK; |
| | LOADS, CONCRETE, ANCHORING, |
| | FBC415.7.2.2, TANK PROTECTION), NFPA30 |
| | (STORAGE OF COMBUSTIBLES), FBC1606.1.3 |
| | (ANCHORING TO PREVENT OVERTURNING).SEE |
| | ALSO FBC415.7.1.1, AND FBC415.7.1.5, |
| | GRAIN ELEVATORS AND SIMILAR STRUCTURES; |
| | THIS APPEARS TO APPLY TO THE STORAGE |
| | SILO (PROVIDE INFORMATION IN REGARDS TO |
| | CONSTRUCTION TYPE, HEIGHT). |
| | |
| | 33.)E01 STATES THAT CALCULATIONS FOR |
| | THE LIGHT POLE WILL BE REQUIRED.NOTE |
| | THAT CALCULATIONS FOR THE LIGHT FIXTURE |
| | ARE REQUIRED ALSO. |
| | |
| | 34.)THE SIGNATURES ON THE ELECTRICAL |
| | SHEETS APPEAR TO BE A PHOTOCOPY OF A |
| | STAMP.WET SIGNATURE REQUIRED PER FBPE. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW-? NOT ADDRESSED; ONE COPY OF |
| | PLANS RETAINED BY ELECTRIC REVIEWER FOR |
| | POSSIBLE SUBMITTAL TO FBPE. |
| | |
| | 35-36.) ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 37.) SEE FBC307.3 THROUGH 307.5.THE |
| | HAZARD ANALYSIS CLASSIFIED THREE OF THE |
| | MATERIALS USED IN PROCESSING AND STORED |
| | IN THE PROPOSED BUILDING AS H4.THE |
| | REPORT DID NOT ADDRESS THE CHEMICALS AS |
| | RELATED TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF FBC307.3 |
| | THROUGH 307.5.FBC307.3 "BUILDINGS AND |
| | STRUCTURES CONTAINING MATERIALS THAT |
| | POSE A DEFLAGRATION HAZARD . . ." |
| | CLASSIFIES THE BUILDING AS H2.THE |
| | HAZARD REPORT ADDRESSED THE DEFLAGRATION |
| | RISK AND EXPLAINED THAT HAZARDS ARE |
| | PREVENTED; BUT DOESN?T THE RISK ITSELF |
| | PUT THIS BUILDING IN H2 CLASSIFICATION? |
| | |
| | 38.) SEE FBC414.1.3.IT APPEARS THAT |
| | PORTIONS OF THE BUILDING MAY HAVE H4 |
| | OCCUPANCY, AND MAY ALSO HAVE A |
| | CLASSIFICATION OF H2 OR H3.INCORPORATE |
| | THE REQUIRED INFORMATION (SOME OF WHICH |
| | IS IN THE HAZARDS ANALYSIS) INTO THE |
| | PLAN.ADDRESS QUANTITIES OF HAZARDOUS |
| | MATERIALS WHICH WILL BE USED DURING |
| | PROCESSING. |
| | |
| | 39.) IN THE RESPONSE LETTER, YOU |
| | REFERRED TO MEETINGS WITH FIRE AND THE |
| | HAZARDS ANALYSIS REPORT AND TO PREVIOUS |
| | MEETINGS AND DISCUSSIONS WITH MIKE |
| | CARSILLO AND JAKE LEAHY.PLEASE NOTE |
| | THAT COMPLIANCE WITH FBC2004 IS REQUIRED |
| | IN ADDITION TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA, |
| | AND ALSO THAT PAPERWORK SUBMITTED |
| | SEPARATELY FROM THE PERMIT PACKAGE |
| | (APPLICATION, PLANS, SPECS, ETC.), MAY |
| | NOT BE AVAILABLE TO OTHER REVIEWERS. |
| | |
| | 40.) THREE COPIES OF ALL DOCUMENTS |
| | REQUIRED.A STACK OF UNCOLLATED PAPERS |
| | WAS SUBMITTED WHICH INCLUDED COPIES OF |
| | THE HAZARD ANALYSIS AND MSDS SHEETS. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE ALL DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE |
| | REQUIRED TO SHOW CODE COMPLIANCE IN A |
| | MORE ORGANIZED FORMAT; THREE DISTINCT |
| | COPIES, PREFERABLY INDEXED AND TABBED. |
| | |
| | THIS MAY BE DONE EITHER WITH A SHOP |
| | DRAWING REVIEW STAMP OR A COVER LETTER |
| | REFERRING TO EACH PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 41.) THE HAZARD REPORT IS DATED AUGUST, |
| | 2005 AND REFERS TO FLORIDA BUILDING |
| | CODE.SECTION 2.3 BUILDING |
| | CLASSIFICATION (HAZARD REPORT) STATES |
| | "BASED ON SECTION 307 OF THE GROUP H . . |
| | . BUILDINGS ARE CONSIDERED TO HAVE |
| | DEFLAGRATION HAZARDS IF COMBUSTIBLE |
| | DUSTS ARE STORED IN PILES OR WITHIN OPEN |
| | CONTAINERS . . . " |
| | |
| | THE SECTION QUOTED REGARDING COMBUSTIBLE |
| | DUSTS WAS FROM FBC2001, SECTION 308. |
| | FBC2004 307.2, H2 OCCUPANCY STATES |
| | "BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES CONTAINING |
| | MATERIALS THAT POSE A DEFLAGRATION |
| | HAZARD OR A HAZARD FROM ACCELERATED |
| | BURNING SHALL BE CLASSIFIED AS GROUP |
| | H2."IT APPEARS FROM THE REPORTS |
| | PROVIDED THAT A DEFLAGRATION HAZARD DOES |
| | EXIST IN THE BUILDING.THE HAZARD |
| | ANALYSIS STATES ". . . THE DRYING |
| | PROCESS HAS POTENTIAL FOR A FIRE OR |
| | DEFLAGRATION."IT APPEARS THAT THERE |
| | ARE TWO HAZARDS WHICH WOULD CLASSIFY THE |
| | AREAS AS H2; THE STORED SLUDGE, |
| | COMBUSTIBLE DUSTS. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVISE THE HAZARD ANALYSIS TO |
| | REFER TO FBC2004.THE HAZARD ANALYSIS |
| | WAS APPARENTLY PREPARED IN A PRELIMINARY |
| | DESIGN STAGE.THE DESIGN OF THE |
| | BUILDING CHANGED AND THE GOVERNING CODE |
| | CHANGED ON OCTOBER 1, 2005. |
| | |
| | 42.) THE HAZARD ANALYSIS, PAGE 20, TABLE |
| | 2, SHOWS THAT QUANTITIES OF CHEMICALS |
| | WHICH WOULD CLASSIFY THE BUILDING (OR |
| | PORTION OF THE BUILDING) AS H4 WILL BE |
| | STORED IN EXCESS OF THE AMOUNT EXEMPTED |
| | IN FBC TABLE 307.2(2).THE REPORT |
| | STATES THAT THE H4 MATERIALS WILL BE |
| | STORED IN QUANTITIES IN EXCESS OF THE |
| | EXEMPT AMOUNT WITH A 2 HOUR WALL WITH AN |
| | F3 CLASSIFICATION, WHICH WOULD NOT BE |
| | PERMITTED, BUT THE PLAN SHOWS THESE |
| | CHEMICALS AS STORED IN ANOTHER |
| | STRUCTURE.AS THE HAZARD ANALYSIS WAS |
| | PREPARED PRIOR TO FINALIZATION OF THE |
| | DESIGN, PLEASE REVISE TO BE CONSISTENT |
| | WITH THE PLANS SUBMITTED FOR |
| | APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | 43.) WHAT QUANTITY OF THE CORROSIVE |
| | CHEMICALS WILL BE USED IN THE PROCESSING |
| | AREA? |
| | |
| | 44.) THE MAXIMUM VOLUME, STORED, OF |
| | DUSTROL 3010 (OR EQUIVALENT) FIELD WAS |
| | LEFT BLANK (PAGE 20, TABLE 2).IT |
| | INDICATES N/A, STORED OUTSIDE, AND THE |
| | NOTE "STORAGE BELOW EXEMPT AMOUNT". |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE THE VOLUME.INDICATE |
| | DISTANCE ON THE SITE PLAN.SHOW |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH THE DISTANCE |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 30, 4.3.2 AND NFPA |
| | 430.NOTE THAT IT APPEARS CLOSE TO THE |
| | CHEMICAL STORAGE STRUCTURE.NO |
| | INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED IN REGARDS TO |
| | THE STORAGE TANK. |
| | |
| | 45.)SEE FBC307.1 THROUGH 307.5.THE |
| | HAZARD ANALYSIS DID NOT ADDRESS |
| | OXIDIZERS BUT THE SHEET PREPARED BY |
| | CRAWFORD INDUSTRIAL GROUP IS AN OXIDIZER |
| | PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM.ARE ALL OXIDIZERS |
| | USED OUTSIDE?WHAT DISTANCE FROM THE |
| | BUILDING? |
| | |
| | 46.) AS YOU HAVE DECLARED F3 OCCUPANCY |
| | ON THE PLAN, IN THE RESPONSE LETTER, AND |
| | IN THE HAZARD REPORT, BUT SHOW USE AND |
| | STORAGE OF CHEMICALS WHICH MAY CLASSIFY |
| | THE BUILDING OR PORTION OF BUILDING AS |
| | H4, AND SHOW 2 HOUR FIRE SEPARATIONS, IT |
| | APPEARS THAT YOU ARE CLASSIFYING THESE |
| | AREAS AS INCIDENTAL OR ACCESSORY USE. |
| | PLEASE CLARIFY YOUR CLASSIFICATION AS F3 |
| | AS IT APPEARS TO BE H4 OR AN OCCUPANCY |
| | WITH MULTIPLE HAZARDS FBC307.8.THE |
| | PRELIMINARY CODE INVESTIGATION PREPARED |
| | BY RCT DATED APRIL 19, 2006 REFERS TO |
| | BOTH INCIDENTAL AND ACCESSORY USE.HOW |
| | THE CODE REFERENCES IN THE REPORT APPLY |
| | TO THE DIFFERENT AREAS OF YOUR PROJECT |
| | IS NOT CLEAR.IF YOUR INTENTION IS TO |
| | RESUBMIT THE PLANS WITH AN F3 OCCUPANCY |
| | A THIRD TIME (RATHER THAN H), PLEASE |
| | CONTACT ME TO RESOLVE THIS ISSUE PRIOR |
| | TO RESUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | 47.) THE RESPONSE LETTER AND CODE |
| | INVESTIGATION REPORT ARE USEFUL IN |
| | EXPEDITING PLAN REVIEW.HOWEVER, THEY |
| | WILL NOT BE A PART OF THE ISSUED PERMIT |
| | PACKAGE UNLESS SIGNED, SEALED, AND |
| | DATED.ALL RESPONSES WHICH SHOW CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE ARE TO BE INCORPORATED INTO |
| | THE PLAN.THE HAZARD ANALYSIS WILL BE A |
| | PART OF THE PERMIT PACKAGE, AND IS TO BE |
| | SIGNED, SEALED, AND DATED. |
| | |
| | 48.) C12, ACCESSIBLE PARKING, THE FEE IS |
| | $250 RATHER THAN $100, CITY OF WEST PALM |
| | BEACH RESOLUTION #390-03, SECTION 2, #D. |
| | |
| | 49.) OLD SHEETS WERE NOT SUBMITTED.NO |
| | CHANGES WERE CLOUDED, AND EVERY SHEET |
| | WAS CHANGED.IN THE FUTURE, PLEASE |
| | CLEARLY INDICATE CHANGES WITH CLOUDS AND |
| | REVISION NUMBERS, REPLACE ONLY SHEETS |
| | WHICH HAVE BEEN REVISED, AND SUBMIT THE |
| | OLD VOIDED SHEETS SEPARATELY FOR |
| | REFERENCE. |
| | |
| | 50.) COMBUSTIBLES IN CONCEALED SPACES |
| | NOT ALLOWED IN TYPE II CONSTRUCTION, |
| | PLYWOOD ABOVE ALUMINUM SOFFIT, A09, |
| | FBC707.1. |
| | |
| | 51.) THE CHEMICAL STORAGE STRUCTURE IS |
| | TO COMPLY WITH FBC TABLE 601.PROVIDE |
| | INFORMATION IN REGARDS TO THE STRUCTURE |
| | (CONSTRUCTION TYPE, AREA, THE DISTANCE |
| | TO ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE) AND SHOW |
| | COMPLIANCE.IF THIS IS A SEPARATE |
| | STRUCTURE, BOTH STRUCTURES (MAIN |
| | PROCESSING BUILDING AND THE CHEMICAL |
| | STORAGE STRUCTURE) ARE TO COMPLY WITH |
| | THE FIRE RESISTANCE REQUIREMENTS OF |
| | TABLE 601.IF THIS IS A PART OF THE |
| | MAIN PROCESSING BUILDING, THIS AREA IS H |
| | OCCUPANCY, SHOULD BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN |
| | AS MIXED OCCUPANCY, AND THIS AREA |
| | INCLUDED IN THE AREA CALCULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 52.) THE STAIRWAY, ELEVATOR AND LANDING |
| | IS A PART OF THE BUSINESS OCCUPANCY.NO |
| | FIRE PROTECTION IS SHOWN ON THE FIRST |
| | FLOOR.SEE ALSO FBC1018.3, EXIT |
| | CONTINUITY.IT IS NOT CLEAR IF THIS IS |
| | INTENDED TO BE A VERTICAL EXIT, FBC1019, |
| | OR AN EXTERIOR STAIR, FBC1022. |
| | |
| | 53.) A15 STATES THAT THE TILT WALL |
| | CONSTRUCTION IS TO COMPLY WITH PALM |
| | BEACH COUNTY REQUIREMENTS.CORRECT AHJ |
| | IS CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH. |
| | |
| | 54.) INCLUDE THE CATWALKS IN THE AREA |
| | CALCULATIONS.THEY ARE TO COMPLY WITH |
| | FBC505.5. |
| | |
| | 55.) S01, PRESSURES ARE GIVEN FOR THE |
| | ROOF ENCLOSURE.THEY ARE ALL WALL |
| | PRESSURES.WHAT ARE THE ROOF PRESSURES? |
| | |
| | |
| | 56.) S01, CONCRETE CAST PERMANENTLY |
| | AGAINST THE EARTH IS TO HAVE 3IN MINIMUM |
| | COVER, FBC TABLE 1907.7.1.THIS |
| | DIMENSION IS NOT PROVIDED IN THE |
| | SPECIFICATION.IT IS SHOWN ON SOME BUT |
| | NOT ALL OF THE DETAILS. |
| | |
| | 57.) WOULD THIS BE CONSIDERED A |
| | CORROSIVE ENVIRONMENT?CONCRETE |
| | COVERAGE IS TO COMPLY WITH FBC1907.7.5, |
| | ACI 381 7.7.5. |
| | |
| | 58.)THE OCCUPANT LOAD FOR THE BUSINESS |
| | AREA SHOULD BE 48 RATHER THAN 47 (ROUND |
| | UP), FBC1004.1.2. |
| | |
| | 59.)SEE FBC414.1.3.A FLOOR PLAN IS |
| | TO BE PROVIDED IDENTIFYING THE LOCATIONS |
| | OF ANTICIPATED CONTENTS AND PROCESSES TO |
| | REFLECT THE NATURE OF EACH OCCUPIED |
| | PORTION OF THE BUILDING.INCLUDE |
| | AMOUNTS OF EACH OF THE THREE CHEMICALS, |
| | THE END PRODUCT, METHANE GAS IN THE |
| | SLUDGE STORAGE AREA, ANY OTHER PERTINENT |
| | INFORMATION.SEE ALSO FBC307.1, |
| | DEFINITION OF CONTROL AREAS, AND FBC |
| | TABLES 307.7(1) AND (2).THERE IS |
| | CONFLICT BETWEEN THE HAZARD ANALYSIS AND |
| | PRELIMINARY DESIGN REPORT AND THE PLAN. |
| | ALSO SHOW ANY DOUBLE CONTAINMENT |
| | REQUIRED FOR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. |
| | |
| | 60.)I HAVE RETAINED ONE COPY OF THE |
| | HAZARD ANALYSIS.NOTE THAT THIS BOUND |
| | REPORT IS 19 PAGES; THE LOOSE ONE (WHICH |
| | I HAVE STAPLED) IS 20.IT APPEARS TO BE |
| | A PRINTING ISSUE.PLEASE CONFIRM THAT |
| | THE REPORTS ARE THE SAME AND WHEN |
| | RESUBMITTING, ALL THREE COPIES ARE TO BE |
| | IDENTICAL.NOTE THAT I HAVE ALSO |
| | RETAINED ONE COPY OF EACH OF THE MSDS. |
| | THIS IS SO THAT I MAY HAVE THEM FOR |
| | REFERENCE IF THE DESIGNER OF RECORD |
| | CONTACTS ME TO DISCUSS. |
| | |
| | 61.)THE HAZARD ANALYSIS STATES THAT IT |
| | IS TO BE SUBMITTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH |
| | THE PRELIMINARY DESIGN REPORT.ONLY ONE |
| | COPY OF THE PRELIMINARY DESIGN REPORT |
| | WAS SUBMITTED.PROVIDE THREE ORIGINALS |
| | OF ALL DOCUMENTS REQUIRED TO SHOW CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | 62.)WILL THE CHEMICAL STORAGE AND SILO |
| | BE SPRINKLED?IF NOT, WILL THEY HAVE |
| | OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS? |
| | |
| | 63.)THE MSDS STATES THAT SULFURIC ACID |
| | IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH SODIUM HYDROXIDE. |
| | PROVIDE INFORMATION IN REGARDS TO HOW |
| | THIS WILL BE ADDRESSED.THEY ARE STORED |
| | IN THE SAME OUTDOOR STRUCTURE WITH A |
| | WALL IN BETWEEN.PROVIDE INFORMATION IN |
| | REGARDS TO THE WALL.HOW WILL YOU |
| | PREVENT ACCIDENTAL EXPOSURE OF ONE |
| | CHEMICAL TO THE OTHER, SUCH AS DURING |
| | THE EVENT OF A WINDSTORM? |
| | |
| | 64.)THE MSDS STATES THAT SODIUM |
| | HYDROXIDE SOLUTION IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH |
| | CHLORO ORGANIC COMPOUNDS.DO ANY OF THE |
| | OTHER CHEMICALS FALL INTO THIS CATEGORY |
| | OF CHEMICALS? |
| | |
| | 65.)THE MSDS STATE THAT SULFURIC ACID |
| | IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH METALS, AND SODIUM |
| | HYDROXIDE CAN REACT WITH METALS TO FORM |
| | FLAMMABLE HYDROGEN GAS.THE PLAN A25 |
| | STATES THAT THE METAL WILL BE COATED IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS. |
| | NOTE COATINGS ON THE PLAN, AND ALSO SEE |
| | COMMENT ABOVE IN PREVENTING ACCIDENTAL |
| | EXPOSURE OF THE CHEMICALS TO THE STEEL |
| | STRUCTURE. |
| | |
| | 66.)IS THERE A MOISTURE MONITORING |
| | SYSTEM FOR THE SILO?WILL SYSTEMS BE |
| | MONITORED BY ALARMS? |
| | |
| | 67.)SEE FBC414.3, HAZARD OCCUPANCY, |
| | MANUAL SHUTOFF FOR VENTILATION EQUIPMENT |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 68.)IT IS NOT CLEAR IF THERE IS A |
| | HAZARD FROM METHANE GASES FOR THE SLUDGE |
| | STORAGE AREA.IF THIS PORTION OF THE |
| | BUILDING IS F3, OCCUPANCY SEPARATION IS |
| | REQUIRED BETWEEN THIS TWO STORY AREA AND |
| | THE PROCESSING AREA.IF THIS IS H2, ONE |
| | STORY ALLOWED FBC TABLE 503.THE |
| | REDUCED HAZARD (SLUDGE CAKE COMPARED TO |
| | SLUDGE) WAS ADDRESSED IN THE LETTER |
| | DATED MAY 2, 2005 PREPARED BY HDR AND |
| | ADDRESSED TO CAPTAIN MIKE CARSILLO.THE |
| | PLANS ARE MARKED SLUDGE STORAGE; IS THIS |
| | SLUDGE OR SLUDGE CAKE?THE REPORT |
| | MENTIONS SLUDGE CAKE GOING THROUGH THE |
| | DRYING PROCESS, BUT DOES NOT MENTION THE |
| | DEWATERING AREA FUNCTION. |
| | |
| | 69.)THE LETTER ALSO STATES THAT FUEL |
| | WILL BE STORED ON SITE FOR THE EMERGENCY |
| | GENERATOR.WHERE WILL THE FUEL BE |
| | STORED, AND IN WHAT QUANTITY? |
| | |
| | 70.)FBC414.5.4, STANDBY POWER |
| | REQUIRED.PLEASE PROVIDE ALL |
| | INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR THE GENERATOR |
| | WHICH IS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 71.)SEE PLUMBING COMMENTS REGARDING |
| | ACCESSIBLE BATHROOM STALL. |
| | |
| | 72.)SEE PLUMBING COMMENTS REGARDING |
| | THE ROOF DRAINS. |
| | |
| | 73.)SEE ALSO FBC414.6.1 REGARDING |
| | OUTSIDE STORAGE SHELTERS FOR HAZARDOUS |
| | CHEMICALS. |
| | |
| | 74.)SEE FBC415.7.1.2 REGARDING |
| | OPERATIONS THAT PRODUCE COMBUSTIBLE |
| | DUSTS.HOW DOES THIS REQUIREMENT AFFECT |
| | THE CYCLONE SEPARATOR AND THE SCREENING |
| | PROCESS?IT APPEARS THAT THESE TWO |
| | PROCESSES GENERATE COMBUSTIBLE DUSTS. |
| 2006-03-28 00:00:00 | |
