Plan Review Details - Permit 05071170
Plan Review Stops For Permit 05071170
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2006-06-19 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2006-06-19 Time 09:43 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2006-06-19 Time 07:41 Sent To  
Notes
2006-06-19 00:00:00****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 561-805-6724 [email protected]
  
 FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004
 FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS
 TO THE FBC2004
  
 FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS; ITEMS NOT
 ADDRESSED
  
 1.) THE TEST REPORT SUBMITTED TO SHOW
 CODE COMPLIANCE FOR THE BUTT GLASS BAY
 WINDOW WAS AN EXPERIMENTAL REPORT WHICH
 DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE IN CONFORMANCE
 WITH THE TESTING STANDARDS REQUIRED BY
 FBC1707.4.2.1.
  
 IF YOU ARE USING A TEST REPORT TO SHOW
 CODE COMPLIANCE, A SIGNED, SEALED, DATED
 ORIGINALS REQUIRED, BUT ALSO MUST BE
 CODE COMPLIANT.
  
 2.)THE TEST REPORT SUBMITTED DOES NOT
 PROVIDE ENOUGH INFORMATION ABOUT THE
 WINDOW UNIT TESTED.FROM THE TEST
 REPORT I CANNOT DETERMINE IF IT IS THE
 PRODUCT YOU ARE PROPOSING TO INSTALL,
 ARCH ALUMINUM SERIES 4500, OR IF AN
 EQUIVALENT PRODUCT WAS TESTED.
  
 3.)THE WINDOW SIZES PROPOSED IS LARGER
 IN BOTH OVERALL SIZE AS WELL AS THE
 FRONT PANEL SIZE.IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW
 YOU HAVE ARRIVED AT THE DESIGN PRESSURE.
  
 WINDOW SIZE CHANGED BUT OVERALL SIZE IS
 STILL LARGER THAN THE TESTED UNIT.
 PANEL WIDTH LARGER THAN TESTED UNIT.
  
 4.)THE ENGINEERING FOR THE 84X144
 OPENING DOES NOT INDICATE WHICH ARCH
 ALUMINUM PRODUCT YOU ARE USING.
  
 5.)ORIGINAL SIGNATURE REQUIRED ON THE
 LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL APPLICATION.
  
 6.)WHEN RESUBMITTING, ALL DOCUMENTS
 WHICH YOU ARE USING TO SHOW CODE
 COMPLIANCE (SUCH AS ENGINEERING,
 CALCULATIONS OR TEST REPORTS) ARE TO BE
 SIGNED, SEALED ORIGINALS.ONCE A LOCAL
 PRODUCT APPROVAL IS ISSUED, THE ORIGINAL
 CAN REMAIN ON FILE AND COPIES CAN BE
 SUBMITTED FOR INDIVIDUAL PERMITS.
  
 NEW COMMENTS:
  
 7.)THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS EXPIRED,
 OVER SIX MONTHS WITHOUT COMMENCING WORK,
 FBC2001 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 AMENDMENTS 104.1.6.THE BUILDING CODE
 CHANGED EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 1, 2005.
 SUBMIT A NEW APPLICATION.ALL PAPERWORK
 TO COMPLY WITH FBC2004.
  
 8.)THE LETTER OF INTENT REGARDING THE
 INSPECTION IS TO BE A SIGNED,SEALED,
 DATED ORIGINAL.
  
 9.)THE ENGINEER'S SEAL IS EXPIRED;
 SHOULD SAY "LICENSE" RATHER THAN
 "CERTIFICATE" EFFECTIVE JAN 1, 2006.
  
 10.)THE LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL
 APPLICATION IS TO BE A SIGNED ORIGINAL.
  
 11.)SEE ATTACHED DESIGN PRESSURES FROM
 THE APPROVED PLAN.THE DP REQUIREMENT
 FOR THIS OPENING IS +30/-38.THE
 ENGINEERING SHOWS A PRODUCT LIMITATION
 OF +27/-30. THE OPENING SIZE ON THE PLAN
 CONFLICTS WITH THE ENGINEERING
 SUBMITTED. ADDRESS.
  
 12.)AS DISCUSSED ON THE TELEPHONE WITH
 THE ENGINEER, LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL
 REQUIRED FAC9B72.LOCAL PRODUCT
 APPROVAL COMPLIANCE CAN BE SHOWN THROUGH
 AN EVALUATION REPORT RATHER THAN TESTING
 AND ENGINEERING.PLEASE REVIEW THE RULE
 FAC9B-72, LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL
 APPLICATION, AND VALIDATION CHECKLIST.
 THIS IS AVAILABLE ONLINE AT
 WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG, PRODUCT
 APPROVAL.
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2005-09-20 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2005-09-20 Time 15:30 Rev Time 3.00
Received By shill Date 2005-09-20 Time 15:30 Sent To PC
Notes
2005-09-20 00:00:00****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 561-805-6724 [email protected]
  
 FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001
 FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS
 TO THE FBC2001
  
 1.) THE TEST REPORT SUBMITTED TO SHOW
 CODE COMPLIANCE FOR THE BUTT GLASS BAY
 WINDOW WAS AN EXPERIMENTAL REPORT WHICH
 DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE IN CONFORMANCE
 WITH THE TESTING STANDARDS REQUIRED BY
 FBC1707.4.2.1.
  
 2.)THE TEST REPORT SUBMITTED DOES NOT
 PROVIDE ENOUGH INFORMATION ABOUT THE
 WINDOW UNIT TESTED.FROM THE TEST
 REPORT I CANNOT DETERMINE IF IT IS THE
 PRODUCT YOU ARE PROPOSING TO INSTALL,
 ARCH ALUMINUM SERIES 4500, OR IF AN
 EQUIVALENT PRODUCT WAS TESTED.
  
 3.)THE WINDOW SIZES PROPOSED IS LARGER
 IN BOTH OVERALL SIZE AS WELL AS THE
 FRONT PANEL SIZE.IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW
 YOU HAVE ARRIVED AT THE DESIGN PRESSURE.
  
 4.)THE ENGINEERING FOR THE 84X144
 OPENING DOES NOT INDICATE WHICH ARCH
 ALUMINUM PRODUCT YOU ARE USING.
  
 5.)ORIGINAL SIGNATURE REQUIRED ON THE
 LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL APPLICATION.
  
 6.)WHEN RESUBMITTING, ALL DOCUMENTS
 WHICH YOU ARE USING TO SHOW CODE
 COMPLIANCE (SUCH AS ENGINEERING,
 CALCULATIONS OR TEST REPORTS) ARE TO BE
 SIGNED, SEALED ORIGINALS.ONCE A LOCAL
 PRODUCT APPROVAL IS ISSUED, THE ORIGINAL
 CAN REMAIN ON FILE AND COPIES CAN BE
 SUBMITTED FOR INDIVIDUAL PERMITS.
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2005-07-27 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2005-07-27 Time 13:37 Rev Time 0.50
Received By shill Date 2005-07-27 Time 13:37 Sent To PC
Notes
2005-07-27 00:00:00****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
  
 1.) FROM PERMIT NUMBER 05030986:
  
 THE SAME ENGINEERING THAT WAS DENIED
 PREVIOUSLY WAS RESUBMITTED.THE
 PRESSURES ON THE PLAN FOR THESE OPENINGS
 ARE +31/-41, SHEET A2.THE ENGINEERING
 (FOR THE BUTT GLASS) HAS A DP OF
 +30.1/-32.8.PLEASE ADDRESS BEFORE
 APPLYING FOR A PERMIT - DO NOT SUBMIT
 THE SAME PAPERWORK UNLESS YOU REVISE
 SHEET A2 AS DISCUSSED WITH THE ENGINEER.
  
 THERE WAS A WINDOW SCHEDULE FROM THE
 ENGINEER DATED 6/14/05.IT DOES NOT
 HAVE ALL OF THE BUTT GLASS OPENINGS
 (THERE SHOULD BE 3) AND ALSO DOES NOT
 HAVE DESIGN PRESSURES.ALSO TO AVOID
 CONFUSION PLEASE HAVE THE ARCHITECT
 REVISE A2 IF HE WISHES TO CHANGE THE
 DESIGN PRESSURES FOR THESE OPENINGS.
 OTHERWISE SUBMIT COMPLIANT PAPERWORK
 MEETING THE DESIGN PRESSURES ON THE
 PLAN.
  
 2.)THERE IS ALSO ENGINEERING IN THE
 PACKAGE WHICH WAS DENIED WHICH HAS
 NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS GLASS
 APPLICATION.PLEASE RETAIN THAT
 PAPERWORK.
  
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2006-06-14 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2006-06-14 Time 14:56 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2006-06-14 Time 14:56 Sent To B
Notes
2006-06-14 00:00:00TO "SHILL" DESK/RESUB
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2005-09-19 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2005-09-19 Time 08:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2005-09-19 Time 08:42 Sent To B
Notes
2005-09-19 00:00:00TO "SHILL" DESK/RESUB
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2005-09-20 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2005-07-27 Time 15:30 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2005-07-27 Time 13:32 Sent To  
Notes
2005-07-27 00:00:00TO "SHILL" DESK


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved