Plan Review Details - Permit 05061669
Plan Review Stops For Permit 05061669
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 5 Status F Date 2007-07-17 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2007-07-17 Time 10:05 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2007-07-11 Time 11:32 Sent To  
Notes
2007-07-17 10:09:48****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 561-805-6724 [email protected]
  
 FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004
 FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING
 CODE
 FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL FBC*
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 FAC
 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
 FSFLORIDA STATUTE
  
  
 1.)BASED ON APPLICATION DATE OF JUNE 27, 2005,
 GOVERNING CODE SHOULD BE FBC2001.EITHER SUBMIT A NEW
 APPLICATION OR REVISE TO FBC2001.CODE RQUIREMENTS ARE
 THE SAME FOR BUILDING REVIEW, BUT CODE REFERENCES MAY
 DIFFER.
  
 2.)THE HANDRAIL EXTENSION AT THE BOTTOM OF THE STAIR
 IS TO COMPLY WITH FBC1009.11.5, EXTEND HORIZONTALLY FOR
 AT LEAST 12INCHES BEYOND THE BOTTOM RISER.
  
 3.)PROVIDE A GUARD DETAIL FOR THE LOFT, FBC1012.
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2007-03-23 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2007-03-23 Time 11:06 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2007-03-22 Time 13:56 Sent To  
Notes
2007-03-23 11:46:33****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 561-805-6724 [email protected]
  
 FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004
 FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS
 TO THE FBC2004
  
 NOTE - NEW PLANS FROM A NEW DESIGN
 PROFESSIONAL, 2ND -4TH REVIEW FOR NEW DOR
  
 NOTE - FIRST PLAN REVIEWS WERE DONE ON FBC2001 AS A
 PLAN CHECK.GOVERNING CODE FOR THE PROJECT WILL BE
 FBC2004; CODE REFERENCES HAVE BEEN REVISED.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING,PLEASE INCLUDE A RESPONSE LETTER
 INDICATING HOW THE ITEMS WERE ADDRESSED.ALSO INCLUDE
 A SET OF OLD SHEETS.
  
 FROM PREVIOUS LISTS:
  
 1.) ADDRESSED.
  
 2.) IMPACT FEES MAY BE DUE (CHANGE OF
 USE).THE PLANS MUST BE STAMPED
 AND THE RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE
 APPLICATION.233-5025
  
 4TH REVIEW - THE RECEIPT AND THE STAMPED PLAN ARE
 REQUIRED.A RECEIPT FOR $14,880 WAS PROVIDED BUT IT IS
 FOR WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE THE
 RECEIPT FOR THIS PROJECT.
  
 3. - 12.)ADDRESSED.
  
 13.)SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC1007, ALL
 DETAILS - STAIR WIDTH, TREAD AND RISER
 DIMENSIONS FBC1007, ALL REQUIREMENTS OF
 FBC1006.2, HANDRAIL AND GUARDRAIL
 DIMENSIONS FBC1007 AND FBC1015, HANDRAIL
 AND GUARDRAIL DESIGN CRITERIA (FBC1608).
  
 THE RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT THE STAIR RAIL WILL BE
 AT 42", 34-38" REQUIRED.THE PLAN HAS A NOTE WHICH
 STATES "34"MIN 38" MAX" BUT DOES NOT STATE WHAT THIS IS
 FOR.THERE IS A NOTE, THE NEW HANDRAIL SHALL EXTEND 8"
 AT BOTTOM AND 12" HORIZONTALLY AT TOP.THE DETIAL MUST
 COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FBC1009.11.5.THE
 GUARD IS SHOWN AT 48".
  
 14. - 17.)ADDRESSED.
  
 18.)PREVIOUS LISTS QUESTIONED COMPLIANCE WITH
 MEZZANINE REQUIREMENTS.NOTE THAT YOU NOW CALL THIS AN
 ATTIC, BUT AN ATTIC IS UNCONDITIONED AREA BETWEEN FLOOR
 SPACE AND THE ROOF ABOVE; THIS IS CLEARLY NOT AN ATTIC.
 PLEASE PROPERLY DEFINE THIS AREA.
  
 19.)SHOW FIRE RATING REQUIREMENT FOR
 THE DOORS WITHIN 10FT OF THE STAIRS,
 FBC705.1.2.PROVIDE FIRE RATING
 INFORMATION FOR THE SPECIFIC DOOR YOU
 ARE INSTALLING.
  
 THE ELEVATION STATES THIS IS A 1 HOUR DOOR, THE
 SCHEDULE SPECIFIES A 1 1/2 HOUR DOOR.FIRE RESISTANCE
 REQUIREMENTS FOR OTHER OPENINGS ARE NOT NOTED ON THE
 PLAN (WINDOWS, DOOR ON THE SECOND FLOOR).
  
 20.)SHOW ALL DETAILS AND DESIGN LOAD REQUIREMENTS FOR
 THE MEZZANINE.WAS THE
 ORIGINAL MEZZANINE PERMITTED LIKE THIS?
  
 THE AREA IS NOW CALLED AN "ATTIC", PLEASE SEE ITEM 29.
 DESIGN LOADS NOT PROVIDED. SHOW DESIGN LOADS FOR THIS
 AREA, REGARDLESS OF WHAT IT IS LABELED; FBC TABLE
 1604.1.
  
 4TH REQUEST, PROVIDE DESIGN LOADS (DEAD LOAD AND LIVE
 LOAD) FOR THE MECHANICAL MEZZANINE AREA.
  
 21.)PROVIDE AREA CALCULATIONS FOR THE
 SPACE.IT IS NOT CLEAR IF THE MEZZANINE
 WAS INCLUDED WHEN IMPACT FEES WERE PAID.
  
 3RD REVIEW - AREA CALCS PROVIDED CALLING THIS AREA AS A
 MECH ATTIC.IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT BY THE COUNTY NOT
 DONE, SEE ITEM 2 ABOVE.
  
 22.)PROVIDE WIND DESIGN CRITERIA
 REQUIRED BY FBC1606.1.7.
  
 3RD REVEIW - WRONG CODE SPECIFIED BASED ON APPLLICATION
 DATE.
  
 4TH REVIEW - WRONG CODE SPECIFIED BASED ON APPLICATION
 DATE.THIS PROJECT MUST BE DESIGNED TO FBC2004; IT HAS
 AN APPLICATION DATE OF JANUARY 2007.
  
 23-26.)ADDRESSED.
  
 27.)SHOW REQUIRED TENANT/OCCUPANCY
 SEPARATION BETWEEN THE LAUNDROMAT AND
 THE RESTAURANT.DECLARE AN OCCUPANCY
 FOR THE RESTAURANT.
  
 NOT ADDRESSED.THE SEPARATION BETWEEN THE RESTAURANT
 AND THE 2ND FLOOR STATES 5/8 TYPE X DRYWALL, DOES NOT
 STATE HOW MANY LAYERS.YOU SPECIFY A 1 HOUR, BUT 5/8
 TYPE X IS 40 MINUTES.
  
 4TH REVIEW - THE PLAN STATES THIS IS 2 HOURS, 2 LAYERS,
 BUT 2 LAYERS IS 80 MINUTES.SEE FBC 302.3.1, FBC
 708.1(5), FBC708.3, FBC708.4.DESIGN INTENT SHOULD BE
 CLEAR ON THE PLAN.
  
 28.)SEE ATTACHED FS553.80(2)(B).
  
 29.)THE MECHANICAL ROOM IS NOT AN ATTIC, SEE
 DEFINITIONS FBC13-202.IS THIS A MEZZANINE?TO BE
 TREATED AS ANOTHER FLOOR?CODE COMPLIANCE CANNOT BE
 DETERMINED UNTIL DOR DETERMINES HOW TO CLASSIFY THE
 SPACE.NOTE THAT A NEW AREA IS BEING CREATED AND A
 CODE COMPLIANT MEANS OF EGRESS MUST SERVE THAT AREA.
 SHEET 5 STILL CALLS IT A MEZZANINE.
  
 30-31.)ADDRESSED.
  
 32.)PRODUCT APPROVALSWERE SUBMITTED FOR SHUTTERS.
 USE OF REMOVABLE SHUTTERS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE
 BUILDING OFFICIAL, SEE ATTACHED POLICY, ITEM 13.WHAT
 ARE THE SHUTTERS FOR?THE DOORS ARE IMPACT.THE PLAN
 DOES NOT SHOW WINDOW REPLACEMENT.NO SHUTTER
 INSTALLATION PLAN WAS SUBMITTED.
  
 NEW COMMENT:
  
 33.)STORAGE IS SHOWN UNDER THE STAIRS; THIS MUST
 COMPLY WITH FBC1019.1.5.NOTE THAT THIS COMMENT WAS
 MADE ON THE FIRST REVIEW AND THE EQUIPMENT/STORAGE
 REMOVED FROM THE PLAN.PROVIDE INFORMATION IN REGARDS
 TO WHAT WILL BE STORED UNDER THE STAIRS AND SHOW
 COMPLIANCE WITH FBC1019.1.5.
  
 34.)A HARD NONABSORBENT FINISH REQUIRED FOR THE
 BATHROOM AS REQUIRED BY FBC1210.2.
  
 35.)DECLARE OCCUPANT LOAD FOR THE RESTAURANT AREA AND
 FOR THE MEZZANINE, FBC1004.1.IF THE METHOD USED TO
 ESTABLISH OCCUPANT LOAD IS NOT CLEAR, PROVIDE
 CALCULATIONS FOR EACH AREA.
  
 36.)THERE IS A NOTE ON THE PLAN STATING THAT THE
 ARCHITECT IS TO INSPECT ROTTED FLOOR JOISTS.THIS WILL
 BE ISSUED WITH A PROVISO THAT AN INSPECTION IS REQUIRED
 PRIOR TO CONCEALING THIS AREA.
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2006-10-18 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2006-10-18 Time 14:25 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2006-10-18 Time 14:07 Sent To  
Notes
2006-10-18 14:25:07****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 561-805-6724 [email protected]
  
 FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001
 FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS
 TO THE FBC2001
  
 NOTE - NEW PLANS FROM A NEW DESIGN
 PROFESSIONAL, 2ND REVIEW FOR THIS DOR
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING,PLEASE INCLUDE A RESPONSE LETTER
 INDICATING HOW THE ITEMS WERE ADDRESSED.SOME
 QUESTIONS WERE NOT ANSWERED.
  
 FROM PREVIOUS LIST:
  
 1.) ADDRESSED.
  
 2.) IMPACT FEES MAY BE DUE (CHANGE OF
 USE).THE PLANS MUST BE STAMPED
 AND THE RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE
 APPLICATION.233-5025
  
 2ND REVIEW - THE RECEIPT WAS IN THE PACKAGE BUT THE
 PLANS WERE NOT STAMPED.WHEN
 RESUBMITTING, PLEASE BE SURE THAT BOTH
 ITEMS ARE INCLUDED.
  
 3RD REVIEW - THE RECEIPT AND THE STAMPED PLAN ARE
 REQUIRED, NEITHER ARE IN THE PACKAGE.
  
 3. - 7.)ADDRESSED.
  
 8.-12.)ADDRESSED.
  
 13.)SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC1007, ALL
 DETAILS - STAIR WIDTH, TREAD AND RISER
 DIMENSIONS FBC1007, ALL REQUIREMENTS OF
 FBC1006.2, HANDRAIL AND GUARDRAIL
 DIMENSIONS FBC1007 AND FBC1015, HANDRAIL
 AND GUARDRAIL DESIGN CRITERIA (FBC1608).
  
 THIS WAS ADDRESSED BUT THE STAIRRAIL IS NOT COMPLIANT.
 STAIR RISER APPEARS NON COMPLIANT.AS AREA HAS NOT
 BEEN PROPERLY CLASSIFIED, CODE COMPLIANCE CANNOT BE
 DETERMINED.
  
 14. - 15.)ADDRESSED.
  
 16-17.)ADDRESSED.
  
 18.)N/A, NO LONGER CALLED A MEZZANINE.
  
 19.)SHOW FIRE RATING REQUIREMENT FOR
 THE DOORS WITHIN 10FT OF THE STAIRS,
 FBC705.1.2.PROVIDE FIRE RATING
 INFORMATION FOR THE SPECIFIC DOOR YOU
 ARE INSTALLING.
  
 20.)SHOW ALL DETAILS AND DESIGN LOAD REQUIREMENTS FOR
 THE MEZZANINE.WAS THE
 ORIGINAL MEZZANINE PERMITTED LIKE THIS?
  
 THE AREA IS NOW CALLED AN "ATTIC", PLEASE SEE ITEM 29.
 DESIGN LOADS NOT PROVIDED. SHOW DESIGN LOADS FOR THIS
 AREA, REGARDLESS OF WHAT IT IS LABELED; FBC TABLE
 1604.1.
  
 21.)PROVIDE AREA CALCULATIONS FOR THE
 SPACE.IT IS NOT CLEAR IF THE MEZZANINE
 WAS INCLUDED WHEN IMPACT FEES WERE PAID.
  
 3RD REVIEW - AREA NOW CALLED ATTIC, PROVIDE AREA.
  
 22.)PROVIDE WIND DESIGN CRITERIA
 REQUIRED BY FBC1606.1.7.
  
 3RD REVEIW - WRONG CODE SPECIFIED BASED ON APPLLICATION
 DATE.
  
 DECLARE A GOVERNING CODE ON THE PLAN.IF YOU WISH AT
 THIS TIME TO SWITCH TO FBC2004, RESUBMIT WITH NEW
 APPLICATOIN.
  
 PLAN STATES C&C DESIGN PRESSURES, "SEE PLAN", CANNOT
 LOCATE ON THIS PLAN.
  
 23-24.)ADDRESSED.
  
 25.)PREVIOUS PLANS MADE REFERENCE TO
 ACCESSING THE MEZZANINE FROM THE OTHER
 TENANT SPACE.WHAT HAPPENED TO THIS
 OPENING, NO LONGER SHOWN ON THE PLAN?
  
 26.)OLD PLANS SHOWNO LANDING ON THE
 STAIRS, THIS PLAN SHOWS A LANDING.
 ADDRESS.
  
 27.)SHOW REQUIRED TENANT/OCCUPANCY
 SEPARATION BETWEEN THE LAUNDROMAT AND
 THE RESTAURANT.DECLARE AN OCCUPANCY
 FOR THE RESTAURANT.
  
 NOT ADDRESSED.THE SEPARATION BETWEEN THE RESTAURANT
 AND THE 2ND FLOOR STATES 5/8 TYPE X DRYWALL, DOES NOT
 STATE HOW MANY LAYERS.YOU SPECIFY A 1 HOUR, BUT 5/8
 TYPE X IS 40 MINUTES.
  
 28.)SEE ATTACHED FS553.80(2)(B).
  
 NEW COMMENT:
  
 29.)THE MECHANICAL ROOM IS NOT AN ATTIC, SEE
 DEFINITIONS FBC13-202.IS THIS A MEZZANINE?TO BE
 TREATED AS ANOTHER FLOOR?CODE COMPLIANCE CANNOT BE
 DETERMINED UNTIL DOR DETERMINES HOW TO CLASSIFY THE
 SPACE.NOTE THAT A NEW AREA IS BEING CREATED AND A
 CODE COMPLIANT MEANS OF EGRESS MUST SERVE THAT AREA.
 SHEET 5 STILL CALLS IT A MEZZANINE.
  
 30.)SHOW HEIGHT OF THE DOOR AT THE LANDING.
  
 31.)THE PLAN SHOWS A MECHANICAL PLATFORM OUTSIDE OF
 THE BUILDING, "8' ANDER THE BUILDING".PROVIDE A
 COMPLETE DETAIL INCLUDING DESIGN LOAD CRITERIA.PLAN
 STATES "SEE DETAIL 1", CANNOT LOCATED. ZONING REVIEW
 REQUIRED.
  
 32.)PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED ARE FOR NON IMPACT
 WITH SHUTTERS.USE OF REMOVABLE SHUTTERS MUST BE
 APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, SEE ATTACHED POLICY,
 ITEM 13.
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2006-03-13 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2006-03-13 Time 10:32 Rev Time 2.50
Received By shill Date 2006-03-10 Time 10:38 Sent To  
Notes
2006-03-13 00:00:00****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 561-805-6724 [email protected]
  
 FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001
 FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS
 TO THE FBC2001
  
 NOTE - NEW PLANS FROM A NEW DESIGN
 PROFESSIONAL
  
 FROM PREVIOUS LIST:
  
 1.) A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE
 FILED WITH THE CLERK OF COURTS BEFORE A
 PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED.
  
 THE NOC IS EXPIRED, OVER 90 DAYS WITHOUT
 COMMENCING WORK, FS713.13(2).
  
 2.) IMPACT FEES MAY BE DUE (CHANGE OF
 USE).THE PLANS MUST BE STAMPED
 AND THE RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE
 APPLICATION.233-5025
  
 THE RECEIPT WAS IN THE PACKAGE BUT THE
 PLANS WERE NOT STAMPED.WHEN
 RESUBMITTING, PLEASE BE SURE THAT BOTH
 ITEMS ARE INCLUDED.
  
 3.)THE KITCHEN IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED SO
 THAT INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES CAN
 APPROACH, ENTER, AND EXIT THE AREA
 FBC11-4.1.1(3).DOOR IS TO COMPLY WITH
 FBC11-4.13.
  
 THIS WAS APPARENTLY ADDRESSED.THE
 ARCHITECT SENT A RESPONSE LETTER STATING
 "THE DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS
 ADMINISTRATION INSISTED THAT THE KITCHEN
 IS CLOSED OFF BY A DOOR."WHAT DOES
 THIS MEAN?
  
 4. - 7.)ADDRESSED.
  
 8.)PROVIDE ELEVATIONS TO SHOW
 ACCESSIBLE ROUTE; APPEARS TO HAVE A STEP
 UP INTO THE BUILDING.
  
 ELEVATIONS NOT PROVIDED.SLOPES NOT
 PROVIDED.
  
 9. - 12.)ADDRESSED.
  
 13.)HOW WILL THE A/C BE ACCESSED?THE
 NOTE ON THE PLAN IS CONFUSING; STATES TO
 ACCESS THROUGH THE LAUNDRY ON 2ND FLOOR,
 BUT ISN'T THE LAUNDRY ON THE FIRST
 FLOOR?
  
 SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC1007, ALL
 DETAILS - STAIR WIDTH, TREAD AND RISER
 DIMENSIONS FBC1007, ALL REQUIREMENTS OF
 FBC1006.2, HANDRAIL AND GUARDRAIL
 DIMENSIONS FBC1007 AND FBC1015, HANDRAIL
 AND GUARDRAIL DESIGN CRITERIA (FBC1608).
  
 THE DOOR IS AN 80IN DOOR, BUT THE
 DIMENSION FROM THE LANDING TO THE SECOND
 FLOOR SCALED IS APPROXIMATELY 72IN
 TOTAL, INCLUDING THE FLOOR/CEILING
 ASSEMBLY.ADDRESS.
  
 14. - 15.)ADDRESSED.
  
 16.)TWO MEANS OF EGRESS REQUIRED;
 TRAVEL DISTANCE EXCEEDS 50' FBC1025.1.
  
 THE TWO EXIT DOORS ARE LESS THAN HALF
 THE DIAGONAL DISTANCE APART,
 FBC1004.1.4.WHAT ARE THE TWO MEANS OF
 EGRESS FOR THE PERSON IN THE KITCHEN
 AREA TO THE REAR (SINKS)?
  
 17.)THE HC RR DOOR BLOCKS THE EGRESS,
 FBC1012.1.4.
  
 IF THIS IS USED AS SECOND MEANS OF
 EGRESS FOR THE PERSON IN THE REAR
 KITCHEN AREA, THE COMMENT STILL APPLIES.
  
 NEW COMMENTS:
  
 18.)SEE FBC1003.2.5 AND SHOW
 COMPLIANCE FOR THE MEZZANINE CEILING
 HEIGHT.
  
 19.)SHOW FIRE RATING REQUIREMENT FOR
 THE DOORS WITHIN 10FT OF THE STAIRS,
 FBC705.1.2.PROVIDE FIRE RATING
 INFORMATION FOR THE SPECIFIC DOOR YOU
 ARE INSTALLING.
  
 20.)SHOW ALL DETAILS AND DESIGN LOAD
 REQUIREMENTS FOR THE MEZZANINE.WAS THE
 ORIGINAL MEZZANINE PERMITTED LIKE THIS?
  
 21.)PROVIDE AREA CALCULATIONS FOR THE
 SPACE.IT IS NOT CLEAR IF THE MEZZANINE
 WAS INCLUDED WHEN IMPACT FEES WERE PAID.
  
 22.)PROVIDE WIND DESIGN CRITERIA
 REQUIRED BY FBC1606.1.7.
  
 23.)THERE IS A BATHROOM SHOWN IN THE
 ADJACENT TENANT SPACE, PROP.EX.RR.
 PROPOSED EXISTING REST ROOM?WHAT DOES
 THIS MEAN?
  
 24.)MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT IS SHOWN
 UNDER THE STAIRS, THE ONLY MEANS OF
 EGRESS FOR THE RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANTS ON
 THE SECOND FLOOR.THIS CREATES A FIRE
 HAZARD, SEE FBC1007 AND FBC1001.1.4.
  
 25.)PREVIOUS PLANS MADE REFERENCE TO
 ACCESSING THE MEZZANINE FROM THE OTHER
 TENANT SPACE.WHAT HAPPENED TO THIS
 OPENING, NO LONGER SHOWN ON THE PLAN?
  
 26.)OLD PLANS SHOWNO LANDING ON THE
 STAIRS, THIS PLAN SHOWS A LANDING.
 ADDRESS.
  
 27.)SHOW REQUIRED TENANT/OCCUPANCY
 SEPARATION BETWEEN THE LAUNDROMAT AND
 THE RESTAURANT.DECLARE AN OCCUPANCY
 FOR THE RESTAURANT.
  
 28.)SEE ATTACHED FS553.80(2)(B).
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2005-08-05 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2005-08-05 Time 17:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 2005-08-05 Time 08:16 Sent To Z
Notes
2005-08-05 00:00:00****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 561-805-6724 [email protected]
  
 FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001
 FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS
 TO THE FBC2001
  
 1.) A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE
 FILED WITH THE CLERK OF COURTS BEFORE A
 PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED.
  
 2.) IMPACT FEES MAY BE DUE (CHANGE OF
 USE).THE PLANS MUST BE STAMPED
 AND THE RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE
 APPLICATION.233-5025
  
 3.)THE KITCHEN IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED SO
 THAT INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES CAN
 APPROACH, ENTER, AND EXIT THE AREA
 FBC11-4.1.1(3).DOOR IS TO COMPLY WITH
 FBC11-4.13.
  
 4.) THE SINK HOT WATER PIPES (HC RR)
 SHALL BE INSULATED OR OTHERWISE
 CONFIGURED SO AS TO PROTECT AGAINST
 CONTACT, FBC11-4.24.6.
  
 5.)FIXED SEATING IS TO COMPLY WITH
 FBC11-5.1, FBC11-4.32.SHOW COMPLIANCE
 ON THE PLAN.
  
 6.)SHOW FRONT AND SIDE CLEAR FLOOR
 SPACE FOR THE WATER CLOSET,
 FBC11-4.16.2, FBC11 FIGURE 28.
  
 7.)DOOR HARDWARE TO COMPLY WITH
 11-4.13.9.
  
 8.)PROVIDE ELEVATIONS TO SHOW
 ACCESSIBLE ROUTE; APPEARS TO HAVE A STEP
 UP INTO THE BUILDING.
  
 9.)SHOW DOOR DIMENSIONS AND CLEARANCE.
  
 10.)NOTE THE DOOR CONSTRUCTION TYPE.
 IF IT IS WOOD, RODENT PROOFING REQUIRED
 FBC1205.1.1.
  
 11.)WHERE WILL THE EXHAUST DISCHARGE?
 WILL THEY GO THROUGH ANOTHER TENANT
 SPACE?
  
 12.)DECLARE AN OCCUPANCY FOR THE 2ND
 FLOOR.
  
 13.)HOW WILL THE A/C BE ACCESSED?THE
 NOTE ON THE PLAN IS CONFUSING; STATES TO
 ACCESS THROUGH THE LAUNDRY ON 2ND FLOOR,
 BUT ISN'T THE LAUNDRY ON THE FIRST
 FLOOR?
  
 14.)THE SEAL IS TO BE DATED
 FAC61G15-23.002.
  
 15.)DECLARE AN OCCUPANT LOAD.
  
 16.)TWO MEANS OF EGRESS REQUIRED;
 TRAVEL DISTANCE EXCEEDS 50' FBC1025.1.
  
 17.)THE HC RR DOOR BLOCKS THE EGRESS,
 FBC1012.1.4.
  
  
  
  
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 5 Status F Date 2007-06-24 Cont ID  
Sent By dpalmer Date 2007-06-24 Time 09:59 Rev Time 0.00
Received By dpalmer Date 2007-06-24 Time 08:30 Sent To  
Notes
2007-06-24 10:00:02 
 *** UNSAT 5TH REVIEW***
  
 ** PLEASE SEE THERE ARE STILL MANY ITEMS FROM PREVIOUS
 REVIEWS WHICH STILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED.
 PLEASE ALSO SEE SOME NEW NOTES AS SOME INFORMATION HAS
 BEEN ADDED TO PLANS AND SOME INFORMATION ON PREVIOUS
 PLANS AHS NOW BEEN REMOVED.
  
  
 1) NOTE: PLEASE BE SURE PLANS CONTAIN ALL THE RELEVANT
 CODES AND YEARS IN WHICH THE PLANS ARE DESIGNED UNDER.
 THIS WAS NOT DONE IN FACT THE PLANS STILL STATE THE
 2004 FBC WHICH THIS PROJECT IS NOT PERMITTED UNDER.
 PLEASE SEE THE MISPRINTS FOR THE NFPA AND NEC.
 PLEASE SEE COMMENT FOR LOAD CALCULATIONS AS CODE(S)
 STATED ARE NOT FROM THE 2002 NEC WHICH IS WHAT THIS
 PROJECT IS PERMITTED UNDER.
  
 THIS IS REQUIRED WHETHER OR NOT COMMENT IS MADE BY ANY
 OTHER TRADE.
 ** THIS IS UNDER THE 2001 FBC \
 THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM CODES SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLANS
 WHICH ARE RELEVANT TO THE DESIGN OF PROJECT.
 2001 FBC, 2002 NFPA-70(NEC), 2003 NFPA-101, 2002
 NFPA-72 (WHERE APPLICABLE).
  
 2) NOTE: THIS IS THE SAME COMMENT AS PREVIOUS REVIEW.
 PLEASE SEE PLANS STILL ARE MISSING MANY ITEMS NOT
 CIRCUITED. PLEASE SEE SEVERAL LIGHTS WHICH ARE SHOWN ON
 E-2 BUT NOT ON LIGHTING PLANS ON FIRST FLOOR AND NO
 CIRCUITING FOR ANY OF THESE. PLEASE SEE COMMENT FOR
 EMERGENCY LIGHTS ETC.
  
 **PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE**
 PLEASE SHOW AND COMPLETE ALL CIRCUITING ON PLANS AND
 CORRELATE WITH THE SUBMITTED PANEL SCHEDULE. THIS WAS
 STILL NOT DONE; THERE ARE SEVERAL ITEMS ON PLANS WHICH
 DO NOT CONTAIN CIRCUITS. PLEASE ALSO SEE CIRCUIT(S) ON
 PLANS WHICH DO NOT GO TO ANYTHING? PLEASE SEE THAT THE
 PANEL SCHEDULE SHALL BE SPECIFIC TO ALL CIRCUITS AND
 AREAS WHICH THEY FEED. PLEASE BE SURE THE CIRCUITS ON
 SCHEDULE CORRELATES TO THE PLANS FOR ANY ROOM AND AREA
 DESIGNATIONS. THIS REQUIRES THAT THE IDENTIFICATION FOR
 EVERY CIRCUIT SUPPLIED BY A PANEL-BOARD OR SWITCHBOARD
 BE LEGIBLE AND CLEARLY STATE THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE FOR
 WHICH THE CIRCUIT IS USED. CIRCUITS USED FOR THE SAME
 PURPOSE MUST BE IDENTIFIED AS TO THEIR LOCATION. FOR
 EXAMPLE, SMALL APPLIANCE BRANCH CIRCUITS CAN SUPPLY
 OUTLETS IN THE KITCHEN, DINING ROOM, AND KITCHEN
 COUNTERTOPS. IDENTIFYING THE CIRCUITS AS SMALL
 APPLIANCE BRANCH CIRCUITS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE; INSTEAD,
 THEY SHOULD BE IDENTIFIED AS ``KITCHEN WALL
 RECEPTACLES,'' ``DINING ROOM FLOOR RECEPTACLE,'' OR
 ``KITCHEN COUNTERTOP RECEPTACLES LEFT OF SINK.''
 CIRCUIT DIRECTORIES CONTAINING MULTIPLE ENTRIES WITH
 ONLY ``LIGHTS'' OR ``OUTLETS'' DO NOT PROVIDE THE
 SUFFICIENT DETAIL REQUIRED BY THIS SECTION.
 FBC104.3.1.1 ADMIN SECT 2001.
 NEC 408.4, 240.4, 310.16
  
 3) NOTE:THIS NOTE REMAINS AS CIRCUITING HAS NOT BEEN
 COMPLETED ON PLANS AND REVIEW FOR COMPLIANCE CAN NOT BE
 DONE.
  
 ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE **
 PLEASE SEE 700.12F AS THE EM AND EXT LTS SHALL BE
 CIRCUITED TO THE BRANCH CIRCUIT LIGHTING IN ANY ONE
 AREA WHERE THESE FIXTURES ARE LOCATED.
 PLEASE ALSO SEE COMMENT WITH RESPECT TO FIXTURES AND
 TYPES.
 THIS COMMENT WAS MADE ON PREVIOUS REVIEW FOR
 CIRCUITING.
  
 4) NOTE:PLEASE SEE THE LOAD CALCULATIONS AS SUBMITTED
 ARE NOT CORRECT. PLEASE SEE THE 2002 NEC AND SHOW LOAD
 CALCULATIONS PER NEC. THE LOAD CALCULATIONS AS SHOWN DO
 NOT COORDINATE WITH THE NEC. PLEASE SEE THE NEC HAS
 SEVERAL EXAMPLES WHICH CAN BE USED.
 PLEASE SEE THE SHOW WINDOW LOADS DO NOT SEEM TO
 CORRELATE.
 PLEASE SEE THE INCORRECT CODE IS BEING QUOTED. (SHOULD
 BE 2002 NEC).
 PLEASE SEE NOT ALL CONTINUOUS LOADS ARE SHOWN AT 125%.
  
 *PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE **
 PLEASE SHOW LOAD CALCULATIONS, WHICH ARE IN COMPLIANCE
 WITH THE 2002 NEC SECTION. 220.
 THIS WAS NOT DONE; THE CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED ARE NOT
 CODE COMPLIANT IN ANY FASHION.
 PLEASE INDICATE HOW LOADS WERE DERIVED ON A LOAD
 SUMMARY BASED FROM THE NEC. 220.
 220.3,220.10,220.11,220.12 220.13, ALL CONTINUOUS LOADS
 125% PER 215.3, 230.42 AND LARGEST MOTOR LOAD. PLEASE
 INCLUDE ALL EXISTING LOADS WITH NEW LOADS BEING ADDED.
 WHERE IS THE REST OF THE SERVICE FOR BUILDING WHICH
 THIS TENANT IS BEING ADDED TO EXISTING???
  
 5) NOTE: THIS NOTE IS THE SAME. THE RESPONSE MENTIONS
 THERE IS SITE/PUBLIC LIGHTING WHICH PROVIDES THE
 LIGHTING, HOWEVER IT IS NOT PERMITTED TO RELY ON THE
 PUBLIC LIGHTING AND QUOTING THE CODE ON PLANS FOR THE
 CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE THIS IN LIEU OF SHOWING THE
 REQUIRED MINIMUM LEVELS IS NOT PERMITTED.
 PLEASE SEE EMERGENCY LIGHTING ON PLANS WHICH DO NOT
 INDICATE CIRCUITS, FIXTURES WHICH ON FIXTURE LEGEND
 ONLY INDICATES BEING AN EXIT LIGHT AND NOT A
 COMBINATION UNIT.
  
 ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE **
 PLEASE CLARIFY MEANS OF EGRESS LIGHTING REQUIRED FOR
 REAR OF BLDG TO THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. THIS INCLUDES
 A BACK UP FIXTURE OF SOME TYPE. A NOTE ON PLANS WHICH
 MENTIONS LIGHTING TO BE INSTALLED DOES NOT COMPLY WITH
 SHOWING THE MINIMUM AS REQUIRED IN DESIGN. LS 101 2003,
 7.8.1.3, 7.9.2.2. PLEASE KNOW, A MIN OF 10FT CANDLES IS
 REQUIRED UNDER NORMAL AND 1FT CANDLE UNDER EM
 CONDITIONS. PLEASE SHOW.
  
 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE PREVIOUS PLANS SUBMITTED THE
 ELECTRICAL RISER AS NEEDED HOWEVER THERE WERE SEVERAL
 ITEMS WHICH WERE NOT NEC COMPLIANT. PLEASE SEE THE
 PLANS ARE NOW MISSING THE RISER ALL TOGETHER?? PLEASE
 SUBMIT A COMPLETED ELECTRICAL RISER DIAGRAM NEW OR
 EXISTING WHICH IS CODE COMPLIANT.
  
  
 ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE **
 PLEASE SEE NEW RISER SUBMITTED WHICH IS NOT CODE
 COMPLIANT.
 PLEASE SEE THE SERVICE ENTRANCE CONDUCTOR SIZES ALONG
 WITH FEEDERS ARE NOT OF SUFFICIENT SIZE TO CONFORM TO
 NEC 310.16.
 PLEASE SEE SOME OF THE CONDUCTOR SIZES AS SHOWN ARE NOT
 A STANDARD CONDUCTOR SIZE FROM THE STANDARDS OF AWG
 (AMERICAN WIRE GAUGE) OR NEC 310.16.
 PLEASE SEE SOME OF THE CONDUCTORS ARE ONLY RATED FOR
 200AMPS.
 PLEASE SEE NOTE WHICH MENTIONS *TO PANEL POLE* ? WHAT
 IS THIS?
 PLEASE COMPLETE CONDUCTORS IN GUTTER AND THE REST OF
 THE SERVICE. PLEASE SHOW ON PLANS.
 PLEASE INDICATE SIZE OF METER CAN/SERVICE BEING
 PROVIDED. PLEASE SEE NOTE #4 ABOVE.
  
 ? PLEASE SEE 240.4, 230.2, 110.26, 240.24, 408.7,
 215.5, 230.70, 240.6, ETC.
 ? THERE ARE TOO MANY SECTIONS TO LIST.
  
  
 7) NOTE:AS NOT RISER WAS SUBMITTED REVIEW FOR THIS
 PREVIOUS NOTE CAN NOT BE DONE.
  
 ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE **
 PLEASE SEE MISSING EQUIPMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTOR AFTER
 THE FIRST MEANS OF DISCONNECT. AS THE SERVICE SHOWN IS
 NOT CLEAR FOR THE REST OF THE SERVICE, IT IS UNCLEAR
 WHAT AND WHERE EQUIPMENT GROUNDS ARE FOR THE SERVICE
 AND HOW THEY ARE TO BE INSTALLED AS NOT OTHER EQUIPMENT
 IS BEING SHOWN FOR THE SERVICE. PLEASE SEE 250.66,
 250.6, 250.24B, 250.110, 250.50, 250.104
 AS THE GROUNDING ELECTRODE SYSTEM IS NOT COMPLETE AT
 THIS TIME.
  
 8) NOTE:PLEASE SEE THAT THE LIGHTING FIXTURES ON
 PLANS DO NOT CORRELATE WITH THE FIXTURE LEGEND
 PROVIDED. PLEASE SEE THE FIXTURE LEGEND DOES NOT
 PROVIDE ANY FIXTURE INFORMATION. PLEASE SEE THE PLANS
 DO NOT LABEL LIGHTS FOR TYPE OR EVEN AN ALPHA/NUMERIC
 DESIGNATION WHICH CORRELATES TO THE FIXTURE LEGEND??
 MANY ITEMS FOR REVIEW OF CODE COMPLIANCE NEED TO BE
 DONE.
 **PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE**
 PLEASE PROVIDE AND A SYMBOL/FIXTURE LEGEND. UNABLE TO
 REVIEW FIXTURES FOR EM / EXT, ARE THESE COMBO UNITS??
  
 9) NOTE: THIS WAS NOT DONE. RESPONSE MENTIONS TO SEE
 PICTURES, HOWEVER NOT PICTURES WERE LOCATED AND PLANS
 STILL ARE REQUIRED TO SHOW THIS.
 110.26, 408.7, 240.24 ETC.
  
 ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE**
 PLEASE SHOW LOCATION OF THE EXISTING SERVICE. PLEASE
 ALSO SHOW AND INDICATE THE LOAD ON THE EXISTING SERVICE
 WITH NEW LOAD ADDED. AS NOTED ABOVE IN NOTE #4 AND NOTE
 #6.
 220 NEC
 FBC ADMIN SECT 104.3.1.1
  
 10) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE PLANS NOW INDICATE THE CU AND
 DISCONNECT FOR THE UNIT ON THE SIDE OF BUILDING. THE
 PLANS ALSO STATE ON THE ROOF WHICH BY REVIEW OF PLANS
 PLACES THIS UNIT ON THE ROOF WHICH IS NOT PART OF THIS
 BUILDING. THIS UNIT MAY NOT BE LOCATED ON ADJACENT
 PROPERTY/BUILDING ROOF. AS THE UNIT HAS STILL NOT BEEN
 SHOWN ON PLANS FOR LOCATION AND IT SEEMS THE UNIT COULD
 BE LOCATED ON A SEPARATE PROPERTY FURTHER INFORMATION
 IS NEEDED.
 440.11, 110.26, ETC.
  
 11) NOTE:PLEASE SEE NOT ENERGY CALCULATIONS WERE
 SUBMITTED AND THE RESPONSE WAS THAT THESE ARE NOT
 NEEDED. PLEASE SEE THAT ANY CHANGE IN OCCUPANCY
 REQUIRES COMPLIANCE NOT ONLY WITH CHAPTER 13 OF THE FBC
 BUT ALL ELECTRICAL TECHNICAL CODES.
 ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE**
 PLEASE SEE THAT THIS BEING A CHANGE IN OCCUPANCY;
 PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETE ENERGY CALCULATIONS WHICH COMPLY
 WITH THE 2001 FBC CHAPTER 13.
 THIS WAS NOT SUBMITTED AS REQUIRED PER 415.ABCD AND
 415.2 ETC.
  
 12) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FS 553.80(2)(B) WITH RESPECT TO
 REPEAT COMMENTS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE.
 PLEASE SEE AS SEVERAL COMMENTS STILL REMAIN A 4X FEE
 FOR THE PLAN REVIEW PORTION OF THE BASE PERMIT FEE HAS
 BEEN ASSESSED. THE AMOUNT OF $1080.00 WILL BE DUE UPON
 RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE PLANS. THIS FEE IS THE
 RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DESIGNER OF RECORD AND NOT THE
 CONTRACTOR OR OWNER AS STATED IN THE FLORIDA STATUTES.
 ** PLEASE KNOW THAT ONE SET OF PLANS ARE BEING RETAINED
 AND WILL BE PLACED WITH PREVIOUSLY RETAINED PLANS.
  
 13) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE APPLIED VALUE FOR THE COMPLETE
 SCOPE OF WORK INCLUDING ALL LABOR, MATERIALS,
 PERMANENTLY INSTALLED EQUIPMENT; DESIGN COST FOR PLANS
 IS LOW. THIS IS REQUIRED WHETHER OR NOT ANY OF THESE
 ITEMS ARE OWNER SUPPLIED.
 PLEASE SEE 104.6.5 UNDER THE 2001 FBCADMIN SECTION AS
 ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH.
  
  
 ** IMPORTANT**
 ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE
 PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE
 SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED
 SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED
 SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW
 AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY
 OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS.
 PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE
 OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED
 FOR REFERENCE.
 THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND
 AVOID ANY DELAYS.
  
 PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMATION FOR
 REVIEW. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS,
 PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CALL.
  
 DEWEY PALMER
 ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II
 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT.
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 561-805-6717
 [email protected]
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2007-02-11 Cont ID  
Sent By dpalmer Date 2007-02-11 Time 14:47 Rev Time 0.00
Received By dpalmer Date 2007-02-11 Time 13:49 Sent To  
Notes
2007-02-11 14:48:09*** UNSAT 4TH REVIEW***
  
 ** PLEASE SEE NOTES FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS WHICH STILL
 NEED TO BE ADDRESSED ALONG WITH NEW NOTES AS STATED
 BELOW.
  
  
 1) NOTE: PLEASE BE SURE PLANS CONTAIN ALL THE RELEVANT
 CODES AND YEARS IN WHICH THE PLANS ARE DESIGNED UNDER.
  
 THIS IS REQUIRED WHETHER OR NOT COMMENT IS MADE BY ANY
 OTHER TRADE.
 ** THIS IS UNDER THE 2001 FBC \
 THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM CODES SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLANS
 WHICH ARE RELEVANT TO THE DESIGN OF PROJECT.
 2001 FBC, 2002 NFPA-70(NEC), 2003 NFPA-101, 2002
 NFPA-72 (WHERE APPLICABLE).
  
 2 ) NOTE: PLEASE SHOW AND COMPLETE ALL CIRCUITING ON
 PLANS AND CORRELATE WITH THE SUBMITTED PANEL SCHEDULE.
 THIS WAS STILL NOT DONE; THERE ARE SEVERAL ITEMS ON
 PLANS WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN CIRCUITS. PLEASE ALSO SEE
 CIRCUIT(S) ON PLANS WHICH DO NOT GO TO ANYTHING? PLEASE
 SEE THAT THE PANEL SCHEDULE SHALL BE SPECIFIC TO ALL
 CIRCUITS AND AREAS WHICH THEY FEED. PLEASE BE SURE THE
 CIRCUITS ON SCHEDULE CORRELATES TO THE PLANS FOR ANY
 ROOM AND AREA DESIGNATIONS. THIS REQUIRES THAT THE
 IDENTIFICATION FOR EVERY CIRCUIT SUPPLIED BY A
 PANEL-BOARD OR SWITCHBOARD BE LEGIBLE AND CLEARLY STATE
 THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE FOR WHICH THE CIRCUIT IS USED.
 CIRCUITS USED FOR THE SAME PURPOSE MUST BE IDENTIFIED
 AS TO THEIR LOCATION. FOR EXAMPLE, SMALL APPLIANCE
 BRANCH CIRCUITS CAN SUPPLY OUTLETS IN THE KITCHEN,
 DINING ROOM, AND KITCHEN COUNTERTOPS. IDENTIFYING THE
 CIRCUITS AS SMALL APPLIANCE BRANCH CIRCUITS IS NOT
 ACCEPTABLE; INSTEAD, THEY SHOULD BE IDENTIFIED AS
 ``KITCHEN WALL RECEPTACLES,'' ``DINING ROOM FLOOR
 RECEPTACLE,'' OR ``KITCHEN COUNTERTOP RECEPTACLES LEFT
 OF SINK.'' CIRCUIT DIRECTORIES CONTAINING MULTIPLE
 ENTRIES WITH ONLY ``LIGHTS'' OR ``OUTLETS'' DO NOT
 PROVIDE THE SUFFICIENT DETAIL REQUIRED BY THIS
 SECTION.
 FBC104.3.1.1 ADMIN SECT 2001.
 NEC 408.4, 240.4, 310.16
  
 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 700.12E AS THE EM AND EXT LTS SHALL
 BE CIRCUITED TO THE BRANCH CIRCUIT LIGHTING IN ANY ONE
 AREA WHERE THESE FIXTURES ARE LOCATED.
 PLEASE ALSO SEE COMMENT WITH RESPECT TO FIXTURES AND
 TYPES.
 THIS COMMENT WAS MADE ON PREVIOUS REVIEW FOR
 CIRCUITING.
  
 4) NOTE: PLEASE SHOW LOAD CALCULATIONS, WHICH ARE IN
 COMPLIANCE WITH THE 2002 NEC SECTION. 220.
 THIS WAS NOT DONE; THE CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED ARE NOT
 CODE COMPLIANT IN ANY FASHION.
 PLEASE INDICATE HOW LOADS WERE DERIVED ON A LOAD
 SUMMARY BASED FROM THE NEC. 220.
 220.3,220.10,220.11,220.12 220.13, ALL CONTINUOUS LOADS
 125% PER 215.3, 230.42 AND LARGEST MOTOR LOAD. PLEASE
 INCLUDE ALL EXISTING LOADS WITH NEW LOADS BEING ADDED.
 WHERE IS THE REST OF THE SERVICE FOR BUILDING WHICH
 THIS TENANT IS BEING ADDED TO EXISTING???
  
 5) NOTE: PLEASE CLARIFY MEANS OF EGRESS LIGHTING
 REQUIRED FOR REAR OF BLDG TO THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY.
 THIS INCLUDES A BACK UP FIXTURE OF SOME TYPE. A NOTE ON
 PLANS WHICH MENTIONS LIGHTING TO BE INSTALLED DOES NOT
 COMPLY WITH SHOWING THE MINIMUM AS REQUIRED IN DESIGN.
 LS 101 2003, 7.8.1.3, 7.9.2.2. PLEASE KNOW, A MIN OF
 10FT CANDLES IS REQUIRED UNDER NORMAL AND 1FT CANDLE
 UNDER EM CONDITIONS. PLEASE SHOW.
  
 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NEW RISER SUBMITTED WHICH IS NOT
 CODE COMPLIANT.
 PLEASE SEE THE SERVICE ENTRANCE CONDUCTOR SIZES ALONG
 WITH FEEDERS ARE NOT OF SUFFICIENT SIZE TO CONFORM TO
 NEC 310.16.
 PLEASE SEE SOME OF THE CONDUCTOR SIZES AS SHOWN ARE NOT
 A STANDARD CONDUCTOR SIZE FROM THE STANDARDS OF AWG
 (AMERICAN WIRE GAUGE) OR NEC 310.16.
 PLEASE SEE SOME OF THE CONDUCTORS ARE ONLY RATED FOR
 200AMPS.
 PLEASE SEE NOTE WHICH MENTIONS *TO PANEL POLE* ? WHAT
 IS THIS?
 PLEASE COMPLETE CONDUCTORS IN GUTTER AND THE REST OF
 THE SERVICE. PLEASE SHOW ON PLANS.
 PLEASE INDICATE SIZE OF METER CAN/SERVICE BEING
 PROVIDED. PLEASE SEE NOTE #4 ABOVE.
  
 ? PLEASE SEE 240.4, 230.2, 110.26, 240.24, 408.7,
 215.5, 230.70, 240.6, ETC.
 ? THERE ARE TOO MANY SECTIONS TO LIST.
  
  
 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MISSING EQUIPMENT GROUNDING
 CONDUCTOR AFTER THE FIRST MEANS OF DISCONNECT. AS THE
 SERVICE SHOWN IS NOT CLEAR FOR THE REST OF THE SERVICE,
 IT IS UNCLEAR WHAT AND WHERE EQUIPMENT GROUNDS ARE FOR
 THE SERVICE AND HOW THEY ARE TO BE INSTALLED AS NOT
 OTHER EQUIPMENT IS BEING SHOWN FOR THE SERVICE. PLEASE
 SEE 250.66, 250.6, 250.24B, 250.110, 250.50, 250.104
 AS THE GROUNDING ELECTRODE SYSTEM IS NOT COMPLETE AT
 THIS TIME.
  
 8) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE AND A SYMBOL/FIXTURE LEGEND.
 UNABLE TO REVIEW FIXTURES FOR EM / EXT, ARE THESE COMBO
 UNITS??
  
 8) NOTE: PLEASE SHOW LOCATION OF THE EXISTING SERVICE.
 PLEASE ALSO SHOW AND INDICATE THE LOAD ON THE EXISTING
 SERVICE WITH NEW LOAD ADDED. AS NOTED ABOVE IN NOTE #4
 AND NOTE #6.
 220 NEC
 FBC ADMIN SECT 104.3.1.1
  
 9) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 424.3B FOR MIN OCP FOR AHU. PLEASE
 SEE NO MECH PLANS SUBMITTED, UNABLE TO VERIFY THE KW
 RATING OF THE HEAT. PLEASE VERIFY AS THE 6.5 AS SHOWN
 DOES NOT SEEM TO BE A TYPICAL SIZE?
 PLEASE SEE THIS IS THE SAME COMMENT FROM PREVIOUS
 REVIEW.
  
 10) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FS 553.80(2)(B) WITH RESPECT TO
 REPEAT COMMENTS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. PLEASE KNOW IF ANY
 OF THE NOTES ABOVE ARE NOTED ON THE FOLLOWING REVIEW
 FOR COMPLIANCE WHICH HAS NOT BEEN MADE, A FEE FOR PLAN
 REVIEW WILL BE ASSESSED.
 THIS IS ONLY NOTED AT THIS TIME.
  
 11) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THAT THIS BEING A CHANGE IN
 OCCUPANCY, PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETE ENERGY CALCULATIONS
 WHICH COMPLY WITH THE 2001 FBC CHAPTER 13.
 THIS WAS NOT SUBMITTED AS REQUIRED PER 415.ABCD AND
 415.2 ETC.
  
  
 ** IMPORTANT**
 ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE
 PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE
 SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED
 SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED
 SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW
 AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY
 OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS.
 PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE
 OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED
 FOR REFERENCE.
 THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND
 AVOID ANY DELAYS.
  
 PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMATION FOR
 REVIEW. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS,
 PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CALL.
  
 DEWEY PALMER
 ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW
 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT.
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 561-805-6717
 [email protected]
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2006-10-15 Cont ID  
Sent By dpalmer Date 2006-10-15 Time 09:16 Rev Time 0.00
Received By dpalmer Date 2006-10-15 Time 08:31 Sent To  
Notes
2006-10-15 09:16:51**** UNSAT *****
  
 ** THIS IS UNDER THE 2001 FBC \
 THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM CODES SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLANS
 WHICH ARE RELEVANT TO THE DESIGN OF PROJECT.
 2001 FBC, 2002 NFPA-70(NEC), 2003 NFPA-101, 2002
 NFPA-72 (IF APPLICABLE).
  
 ** PLEASE SEE SOME COMMENTS FROM REVIEW DATED 7/6/05 BY
 THIS REVIEWER ARE STILL IN NEED OF ADDRESSING. PLEASE
 ALSO SEE SOME NEW COMMENTS BASED ON PLANS SUBMITTED.
  
 1) NOTE: PLEASE SHOW AND COMPLETE ALL CIRCUITING ON
 PLANS AND CORRELATE WITH THE SUBMITTED PANEL SCHEDULE.
  
 PREVIOUS REVIEW#1
 FBC104.3.1.1 ADMIN SECT 2001.
  
 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 700.12E AS THE EM AND EXT LTS SHALL
 BE CIRCUITED TO THE BRANCH CIRCUIT LIGHTING IN ANY ONE
 AREA WHERE THESE FIXTURES ARE LOCATED.
 PLEASE ALSO SEE COMMENT WITH RESPECT TO FIXTURES AND
 TYPES.
 PREVIOUS REVIEW#1
  
 3) NOTE: PLEASE SHOW LOAD CALCULATIONS, PLEASE INDICATE
 HOW LOADS WERE DERIVED ON A LOAD SUMMARY BASED FROM THE
 NEC. 220. 220.3,220.10,220.11,220.13, ALL CONTINUOUS
 LOADS 125% PER 215.3, 230.42 AND LARGEST MOTOR LOAD.
 PREVIOUS REVIEW.#1
  
 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE CU'S AND POSSIBLE MISSING
 DISCONNECTS, GFI RECEPT. 440.11,110.26, 210.63 PREVIOUS
 REVIEW #1
  
 5) NOTE: PLEASE CLARIFY MEANS OF EGRESS LIGHTING
 REQUIRED FOR REAR OF BLDG TO THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY.
 THIS INCLUDES A BACK UP FIXTURE OF SOME TYPE.
 LS 101 2003, 7.8.1.3, 7.9.2.2. PLEASE KNOW, A MIN OF
 10FT CANDLES IS REQUIRED UNDER NORMAL AND 1FT CANDLE
 UNDER EM CONDITIONS. PLEASE SHOW.
  
 6) NOTE: PLEASE COMPLETE PANEL SCHEDULE AS ITEM SHOWN,
 HOWEVER NO LOADS OR OCP ETC.
 408.4,310.16
  
 7) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE AND A SYMBOL/FIXTURE LEGEND.
 UNABLE TO REVIEW FIXTURES FOR EM / EXT, ARE THESE COMBO
 UNITS??
  
 8) NOTE: PLEASE SHOW LOCATION OF THE EXISTING SERVICE.
 PLEASE ALSO SHOW AND INDICATE THE LOAD ON THE EXISTING
 SERVICE WITH NEW LOAD ADDED.
 220 NEC
 FBC ADMIN SECT 104.3.1.1
  
 9) NOTE: PLEASE SEE E424.3B FOR MIN OCP FOR AHU. PLEASE
 SEE NO MECH PLANS SUBMITTED, UNABLE TO VERIFY THE KW
 RATING OF THE HEAT. PLEASE VERIFY AS THE 6.5 AS SHOWN
 DOES NOT SEEM TO BE A TYPICAL SIZE?
  
 10) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FS 553.80(2)(B) WITH RESPECT TO
 REPEAT COMMENTS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. AS THIS REVIEWER
 DID NOT REVIEW THE 2ND SET OF SUBMITTED PLANS, THIS IS
 ONLY A NOTICE GIVEN AT THIS TIME.
  
 ** PLEASE KNOW, AS ELECTRICAL PLUMB BLDG ETC IS MIXED
 AND NOT ON SEPARATE PLANS/SHEETS, EVEN IF SHEETS ARE
 PASSED BY OTHER REVIEWERS, THEY MAY BE VOID DUE TO THE
 CONTENT OF MORE THAN ONE TRADE ON ONE SHEET.
  
 ** IMPORTANT**
 ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE
 PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE
 SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED
 SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED
 SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW
 AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY
 OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS.
 PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE
 OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED
 FOR REFERENCE.
 THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND
 AVOID ANY DELAYS.
  
 PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMATION FOR
 REVIEW. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS,
 PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CALL.
  
 DEWEY PALMER
 ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW
 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT.
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 561-805-6717
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2006-01-30 Cont ID  
Sent By jleahy Date 2006-01-30 Time 08:20 Rev Time 0.45
Received By jleahy Date 2006-01-30 Time 08:20 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2005-07-06 Cont ID  
Sent By dpalmer Date 2005-07-06 Time 20:18 Rev Time 0.50
Received By dpalmer Date 2005-07-06 Time 20:18 Sent To  
Notes
2005-07-06 00:00:00********* UNSAT *********
  
 1)NOTE: PLEASE SHOW ALL CIRCUITING ON
 PLANS AND CORRELATE WITH PANEL
 SCHEDULE(S) TO BE SUBMITTED,
 215.5
  
 2)NOTE: PLEASE SEE PLANS MENTIONS AHU TO
 BE ACCESIBLE THROUGH LAUNDRY MAT TENANT
 SPACE. THIS SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED. ALL
 ACCESS MUST BE FROM TENANT SPACE FOR
 REST.
 PLEASE SEE TENANT SEPARATION NOTES ETC
 FROM FIRE AND BLDG REVIEW.
 PLEASE SEE NEC FOR ACCESSIBILTY TO
 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT AND DISCONNECTING
 MEANS.
 215.5
  
 3)NOTE: PLEASE CLARIFY NEW OR EXISTING
 REQUIRED SIGN CIRCUIT PER 600.5
  
 4)NOTE: PLEASE SHOW COND UNIT.
 DISCONNECT, GFI RECEPT ETC REQUIRED,
 440.11,210.63
 PLEASE ALSO SHOW MISSING LT/RECEPT FOR
 AHU,210.70,210.63
  
 5)NOTE: PLEASE CLARIFY NEW OR EXISTING
 SHOW WINDOW RECEPTS PER 210.62, LOADS TO
 BE SHOWN PER 220.12.
  
 6)NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT LOAD CALCULATIONS
 FOR NEW LOADS AND EXSITNG LOADS.
 PLEASE INDICATE SIZE OF SERVICE,
 CONDUCTORS, GROUNDING, RISER ETC, NEW?
 EXISTING?
 215.5,250.50,310.16,240.4,220 ETC.
  
 7)NOTE: PLEASE SEE 210.8B3, WHICH
 REQUIRES ALL 15- AND 20-AMPERE, 125-VOLT
 RECEPTACLES IN NONDWELLING-TYPE KITCHENS
 TO BE GFCI PROTECTED. THIS REQUIREMENT
 APPLIES TO EACH AND EVERY 15- AND
 20-AMPERE, 125-VOLT KITCHEN RECEPTACLE,
 WHETHER OR NOT THE RECEPTACLE SERVES
 COUNTERTOP APPLIANCES.
  
 8)NOTE: PLEASE SEE TITLE BLOCK MENTIONS
 ACI, ?? PLEASE CLARIFY? ARCH/ ENGINEERS
 ETC, CONTRACTOR LISTED ON APPLICATION
 MENTIONS SOMEONE ELSE.
 PLEASE SEE FAC 61G1-16.004, FAC
 61G15-23.002, FS 481.219, AND 471.023
 FOR POSSIBLE INFORMAITON REQUIRED.
  
 9)NOTE: PLEASE SPECIFY OF THIS IS A
 "CHANGE IN OCCUPANCY".
 PLEASE SEE OTHER POSSIBE COMMENTS FROM
 OTHER TRADES WHCIH NAY HAVE AN AFFECT ON
 ELECTRICAL PLANS.
  
 PLEASE REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND
 ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED SHEETS INTO
 COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING.
  
 PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMATION FOR
 REVIEW. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS,
 PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CALL.
  
 DEWEY PALMER
 ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 CONSTUCTION SERVICES DEPT.
 561-805-6717
 [email protected]
  
  
 PLEASE REMOVE ALL OLD
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 5 Status P Date 2007-07-02 Cont ID  
Sent By mwennerg Date 2007-07-02 Time 14:08 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mwennerg Date 2007-07-02 Time 14:08 Sent To  
Notes
2007-07-02 14:12:25***PROVISO***
  
 1) PLEASE NOTE THAT PLANS STILL REFERENCE CO2 FOR HOOD
 SUPPRESSION SYSTEM. AS INDICATED IN A PREVIOUS FIRE
 PLAN REVIEW, THE HOOD SUPPRESSION SYSTEM SHALL BE WET
 CHEMICAL IN COMPLIANCE WITH UL 300. PLEASE MAKE
 CORRECTION TO HELP FACILITATE PLANS APPROVAL STAMPING.
  
  
 MIKE WENNERGREN, ASSISTANT FIRE MARSHAL
 FIRE PLAN REVIEW
 FIRE PREVENTION (561) 804-4756
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2007-02-23 Cont ID  
Sent By mwennerg Date 2007-02-23 Time 15:39 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mwennerg Date 2007-02-23 Time 15:39 Sent To  
Notes
2007-02-23 15:48:55***PROVISO***
  
 1) NEW RAILINGS SHALL MEET THE PRESCRIPTIVE STRENGTH
 REQUIREMENTS.
  
 2) IN ADDITION TO "K" EXTINGUISHER IN KITCHEN, 2A-10B,C
 RATED FIRE EXTINGUISHERS ARE REQUIRED.
  
 3) ELEVATIONS DO NOT SHOW ADDRESS ON EXISTING BUILDING.
 ADDRESS TO MEET SIZE AND CONTRAST REQUIREMENTS IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH.
  
  
 MIKE WENNERGREN, ASSISTANT FIRE MARSHAL
 FIRE PLAN REVIEW(561) 805-6722
 FIRE PREVENTION(561) 804-4756
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2006-10-31 Cont ID  
Sent By mwennerg Date 2006-10-31 Time 15:36 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mwennerg Date 2006-10-31 Time 15:36 Sent To  
Notes
2006-10-31 15:43:08***DENIED***
  
 PLEASE NOTE THAT IT DOES NOT APPEAR THAT THE LAST FIRE
 REVIEW HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING
 TAKEN DIRECTLY FROM THE LAST FIRE REVIEW:
  
 1) SEPARATE PLANS AND PERMITS REQUIRED FOR HOOD, DUCT
 AND SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS.
  
 2) PLANS MAKE REFERENCE TO A CO2 SYSTEM. THE PLANS
 SHOULD REFERENCE A WET CHEMICAL SYSTEM THAT COMPLIES
 WITH UL 300.
  
 3) A SINGLE STAIR IS DISPLAYED ON THE NORTH ELEVATION
 WHICH IS IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO DOORS AND WINDOWS. DO
 ANY OTHER EXITS EXIST FROM THE UPSTAIRS APARTMENTS? IF
 NOT, A SINGLE MEANS OF EGRESS IS SHOWN WITH UNPROTECTED
 OPENINGS WITHIN (10) FEET OF THESE STAIRS. PLEASE
 ADVISE.
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS AS THIS WILL HELP EXPEDITE THIS
 PROCESS.
  
  
 MIKE WENNERGREN, ASSISTANT FIRE MARSHAL
 FIRE PLAN REVIEW (561) 805-6722 OR 804-4756
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2006-02-15 Cont ID  
Sent By mcarsill Date 2006-02-15 Time 17:00 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mcarsill Date 2006-02-15 Time 16:59 Sent To  
Notes
2006-02-15 00:00:001. SEPARATE PLANS AND PERMITS REQUIRED
 FOR HOOD, DUCT, AND SUPPRESSION SYSTEM.
  
 2. PLANS MAKE REFERENCE TO A CO2 SYSTEM.
 THE PLANS SHOULD REFERENCE A WET
 CHEMICAL SYSTEM THAT COMPLIES WITH UL
 300.
  
 3. A SINGLE STAIR IS DISPLAYED ON THE
 NORTH ELEVATION WHICH IS IN CLOSE
 PROXIMITY TO DOORS AND WINDOWS. DOES ANY
 OTHER EXITS EXIST FROM THE UPSTAIR
 APARTMENTS. IF NOT, A SINGLE MEANS OF
 EGRESS IS SHOWN WITH UNPROTECTED
 OPENINGS WITHIN 10 FEET OF THESE STAIRS.
 PLEASE ADVISE.
  
 MIKE CARSILLO, CHIEF FIRE PREVENTION
 OFFICER
 804-4709
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2005-07-13 Cont ID  
Sent By mwennerg Date 2005-07-13 Time 11:02 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mwennerg Date 2005-07-13 Time 11:02 Sent To  
Notes
2005-07-13 00:00:00******DENIED******
  
 1) THE FLOOR PLAN MENTIONS 42 SEATS.
 PLEASE ILLUSTRATE HOW THIS WILL BE
 ACCOMPLISHED ON THE DRAWINGS.
  
 2) WHAT IS THE TOTAL OCCUPANCY LOAD FOR
 THE ENTIRE SPACE? IF IN EXCESS OF 50,
 THE DOOR SWINGS ARE INCORRECT, AND MUST
 SWING IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL.
  
 3) PLANS INDICATE A SINGLE EXIT. DOES
 THIS SPACE MEET THE REQUIREMENTS TO
 ALLOW FOR THAT ARRANGEMENT?
  
 4) ELECTRICAL NOTES MENTION SMOKE
 DETECTORS. IF PROVIDED, PLEASE SHOW
 LOCATIONS ON THE PLANS.
  
 5) FIRE EXTINGUISHERS ARE REQUIRED.
 RATING TO BE 2A-10B,C IN SPACE, AND "K"
 TYPE IN THE KITCHEN.
  
 6) IF NOT ALREADY PROVIDED, A MINIMUM OF
 6" HIGH ADDRESS NUMBER IS REQUIRED ON
 THE BUILDING TO CONTRAST WITH
 BACKGROUND. PLEASE SHOW ON PLANS.
  
 7) COOKING THAT PRODUCES GREASE LADEN
 VAPOR REQUIRES A HOOD/SUPPRESSION
 SYSTEM. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS AND
 PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR HOOD AND
 SUPPRESSION SYSTEM.
  
 8) IT WOULD APPEAR THAT THIS BUILDING
 MEETS THE DEFINITION OF MIXED OCCUPANCY.
 WHAT IS THE CURRENT OCCUPANCY OF THE
 SECOND FLOOR?
  
  
 MIKE WENNERGREN, A/CAPTAIN
 WPBFR(561) 805-6722 OR 835-2951
Review Stop G GAS REVIEW
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2007-07-09 Cont ID  
Sent By kstevens Date 2007-07-09 Time 17:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kstevens Date 2007-07-09 Time 17:42 Sent To  
Notes
2007-07-09 17:52:12DENIED
 REFERENCE: FBC-2001 FUEL GAS
  
 FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS: 4TH REVIEW
 *******FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS:
  
  
 1. SHT P-1, GAS SYSTEM IS REQUIRED TO HAVE AN EMERGENCY
 SHUT OFF VALVE FOR COOKING EQUIPMENT. A SHUTOFF VALVE
 IS REQUIRED UPSTREAM OF THE EMERGENCY VALVE AND A UNION
 DOWNSTREAM, SO VALVE CAN BE REPLACED OR REPAIRED.
 ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE FIRST VALVE, (MOST
 UPSTREAM), IS INDICATED AS THE EMERGENCY SHUT OFF
 VALVE. THEN THERE IS A GLOBE TYPE FITTING IDENTIFIED AS
 A UNION. SEE RED LINE EXAMPLE OF A MANUAL SHUT OFF
 VALVE, A UNION, THEN THE EMERGENCY SHUT OFF VALVE,
 (SOLINOID VALVE), IN THAT ORDER.
 *******RESPONSE NOTED AGAIN, BUT THE MANUAL SHUT OFF
 VALVE IS NOT SHOWN ON THE RISER DIAGRAM.
  
 1. OK
 3. OK
 4. OK
 5. OK
  
 6. SHT P-1, SHOW THE DISTANCE FROM THE POINT OF
 DELIVERY, (METER), TO THE MOST REMOTE OUTLET IN THE
 BUILDING AND/OR SYSTEM PER FBC-2001 FUEL GAS CODE
 APPENDIX A - USE OF CAPACITY TABLES (A)(3).
 ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE INFORMATION IS NOT
 INDICATED ON THE PLANS. NOT ADDRESSED. ******RESPONSE
 NOTED, BUT THE DISTANCE IS NOT INDICATED ON SHT P-1.
  
 7. OK
  
 8. SHT P-1, SUBMIT MANUFACTURE SHEETS FOR ALL GAS
 EQUIPMENT TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS NFPA 54,
 NFPA 58, AND THE FBC-2001 FUEL GAS CODE SECTION 402.2.
 ****RESONSE NOTED, BUT THE INDICATE THE MODEL NUMBERS
 FOR THE GRIDDLE, THE RANGE, AND THE BOILER. THE BTU
 LOADS FOR THESE GAS APPLIANCES DO NOT REFLECT ANY OF
 THE MODEL NUMBERS SHOWN. THE MANUFACTURE SPECIFICATION
 SHEETS FOR THE GAS WATER HEATER HAVE NOT BEEN
 SUBMITTED.
 ******RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THIS HAS NOT BEEN ADDRESSED.
 THE BTU'S SHOWN ON THE RISER DIAGRAM DO NOT REFLECT THE
 BTU'S SHOWN ON THE MANUF. SPECIFICATION SHEETS AND THE
 MODELS ARE NOT INDICATED ON THE MANUF. SHEETS. STILL NO
 MANUF. SHEETS FOR THE WATER HEATER.
  
  
 ************NEW COMMENT**********
  
 1B. FOUR TIMES THE FEE WOULD HAVE BEEN ACCESSED ON THIS
 PLAN REVIEW IF ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEWER HAD NOT ALREADY
 DONE SO. IF THE COMMENTS ARE NOT ADDRESSED WHEN
 RESUBMITTING NEXT TIME, ANOTHER FOUR TIMES THE FEE WILL
 BE ACCESS AGAIN ON THE NEXT RESUBMITTAL. FS
 533.80(2)(B).
  
 REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS
 (561) 805-6721
 FAX (561) 805-6731
 E-MAIL [email protected]
Review Stop G GAS REVIEW
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2007-02-27 Cont ID  
Sent By kstevens Date 2007-02-27 Time 10:23 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kstevens Date 2007-02-27 Time 10:23 Sent To  
Notes
2007-02-27 11:10:59DENIED
 REFERENCE: FBC-2001 FUEL GAS
  
 FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS: 4TH REVIEW
  
 1. SHT P-1, GAS SYSTEM IS REQUIRED TO HAVE AN EMERGENCY
 SHUT OFF VALVE FOR COOKING EQUIPMENT. A SHUTOFF VALVE
 IS REQUIRED UPSTREAM OF THE EMERGENCY VALVE AND A UNION
 DOWNSTREAM, SO VALVE CAN BE REPLACED OR REPAIRED.
 ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE FIRST VALVE, (MOST
 UPSTREAM), IS INDICATED AS THE EMERGENCY SHUT OFF
 VALVE. THEN THERE IS A GLOBE TYPE FITTING IDENTIFIED AS
 A UNION. SEE RED LINE EXAMPLE OF A MANUAL SHUT OFF
 VALVE, A UNION, THEN THE EMERGENCY SHUT OFF VALVE,
 (SOLINOID VALVE), IN THAT ORDER.
  
 1. SUBMIT AN ISOMETRIC DRAWING THAT
 CLEARLY SHOWS ALL CUT SECTIONS OF PIPE
 AND CORRESPONDING LENGTHS PER FBC-2001
 FUEL GAS CODE.
 ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THERE ARE SECTIONS THAT SHOW NO
 LENGTH MEASUREMENT. SHOW THE DISTANCE FROM THE METER TO
 FIRST RISER, THE DISTANCE FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE FIRST
 RISER TO THE TOP, AND FROM THE TOP OF THE FIRST RISER
 TO THE START OF THE 7'0" LENGTH OF PIPE IN THE CEILING.
 (SEE HIGHLIGHTED SECTIONS ON ONE SET OF PLANS).
  
 3. OK
  
 4. SHT P-1 TYPE OF GAS, (LP OR NATURAL) ****RESPONSE
 NOTED, BUT PLEASE INDICATE ON THE PLANS.
  
 5. OK
  
 6. SHT P-1, SHOW THE DISTANCE FROM THE POINT OF
 DELIVERY, (METER), TO THE MOST REMOTE OUTLET IN THE
 BUILDING AND/OR SYSTEM PER FBC-2001 FUEL GAS CODE
 APPENDIX A - USE OF CAPACITY TABLES (A)(3).
 ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE INFORMATION IS NOT
 INDICATED ON THE PLANS. NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 7. OK
  
 8. SHT P-1, SUBMIT MANUFACTURE SHEETS FOR ALL GAS
 EQUIPMENT TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS NFPA 54,
 NFPA 58, AND THE FBC-2001 FUEL GAS CODE SECTION 402.2.
 ****RESONSE NOTED, BUT THE INDICATE THE MODEL NUMBERS
 FOR THE GRIDDLE, THE RANGE, AND THE BOILER. THE BTU
 LOADS FOR THESE GAS APPLIANCES DO NOT REFLECT ANY OF
 THE MODEL NUMBERS SHOWN. THE MANUFACTURE SPECIFICATION
 SHEETS FOR THE GAS WATER HEATER HAVE NOT BEEN
 SUBMITTED.
  
 REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS
 (561) 805-6721
 FAX (561) 805-6731
 E-MAIL [email protected]
Review Stop G GAS REVIEW
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2006-10-28 Cont ID  
Sent By pschmitz Date 2006-10-28 Time 06:59 Rev Time 0.00
Received By pschmitz Date 2006-10-28 Time 06:59 Sent To  
Notes
2006-10-28 07:06:30PAUL SCHMITZ, PLUMBING & GAS PLANS
 EXAMINER561-805-6692
  
 [email protected]
 PLUMBING GAS PLAN REVIEW FBC 2001
  
 DENIED
  
 PREVIOUS NOTES FOR GAS NOT ADDRESSED
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING.
 PLEASE INCLUDE A RESPONCE LETTER INDICATING HOW THE
 ITEMS WERE ADDRESSED, THIS WILL HELP TO EXPIDITE THE
 PLAN REVIEW.
  
 (1) SHT 2, GAS SYSTEM IS REQUIRED TO HAVE A EMERGENCY
 SHUT OFF VALVE FOR COOKING
 EQUIPMENT. A SHUTOFF VALVE IS REQUIRED UP STREAM STREAM
 OF THE EMERGENCY VALVE
 AND A UNION DOWN STREAM, SO VALVE CAN BE REPLACED OR
 REPAIRED.
  
 (2)SHT 2, PROVIDE A GAS PIPING ISOMETRICSUBMIT AN
 ISOMETRIC DRAWING THAT CLEARLY SHOWS ALL CUT SECTIONS
 OF PIPE
 AND CORRESPONDING LENGTHS PER FBC-2001 FUEL GAS CODE.
  
 (3) SHT 2,SHOW TYPE OF PIPING MATERIAL BEING
 INSTALLED, ALL PIPE SIZES, (AND THE EDH NUMBER OF
 CORRUGATED STAINLESS STEEL
 TUBING FOR EACH PIPE SIZE BEING USED.
  
 (4) SHT 2, TYPE OF GAS, (LP OR NATURAL)
  
 (5) SHT 2, BTU LOAD OF EACH APPLIANCE AND THE TOTAL BTU
 LOAD ON THE SYSTEM. REFER TO THE FBC-2001 FUEL GAS CODE
 SECS. 401.8
 THRU 402.5.2 AND TABLES 402(1) THRU 402(34).
  
 (6) SHT 2,SHOW THE DISTANCE FROM THE POINT OF
 DELIVERY, (METER), TO THE MOST REMOTE OUTLET IN THE
 BUILDING AND/OR SYSTEM PER
 FBC-2001 FUEL GAS CODE APPENDIX A - USE
 OF CAPACITY TABLES (A)(3).
  
 (7) SHT 2,INDICATE THE DELIVERY PRESSURE (PSI) PER
 FBC-2001 FUEL GAS CODE SEC. 402.2. NATURAL GAS SPECIFY
 .5 PSI OR 2 PSI.
  
 (8) SHT 2, SUBMIT MANUFACTURE SHEETS FOR ALL GAS
 EQUIPMENT TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS NFPA 54,
 NFPA 58, AND THE
 FBC-2001 FUEL GAS CODE SEC 402.2
  
 END OF COMMENTS
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 7 Status N Date 2007-06-05 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2007-06-05 Time 15:23 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2007-06-05 Time 15:23 Sent To  
Notes
2007-06-21 14:32:46TO "COMM" BD#26
2007-06-05 15:24:27WAITING FOR "COMM" BD
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 6 Status N Date 2007-01-29 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2007-01-29 Time 15:13 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2007-01-29 Time 15:13 Sent To  
Notes
2007-02-07 08:30:20TO "COMM" BD#33
2007-01-29 15:14:11WAITING FOR "COMM" BD
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 5 Status N Date 2006-09-23 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2006-09-23 Time 17:01 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2006-09-23 Time 17:01 Sent To  
Notes
2006-10-12 13:42:15TO "COMM" BD#8
2006-09-23 00:00:00WAITING FOR "COMM" BD
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 4 Status N Date 2006-01-13 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2006-01-13 Time 13:58 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2006-01-13 Time 13:58 Sent To  
Notes
2006-01-13 00:00:00WAITING FOR "COMM" BD
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2005-08-05 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2005-08-05 Time 18:21 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2005-08-05 Time 18:21 Sent To Z
Notes
2005-08-05 00:00:00REMOVED FROM COMM BOARD, ROUTED TO
 ZONING BOX (SENT EMAIL TO MM)
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2005-07-13 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2005-07-13 Time 14:00 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2005-07-13 Time 14:00 Sent To  
Notes
2005-07-13 00:00:00TAKEN FROM "BOB". BACK TO "COMM" BD #36
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2006-01-13 Cont ID  
Sent By mmclean Date 2005-08-17 Time 13:36 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2005-06-28 Time 08:54 Sent To  
Notes
2005-07-12 00:00:00TO "BOB" BD#8/TAKEN FROM "COMM" BD#30
2005-07-01 00:00:00TO "COMM" BD#30
2005-06-28 00:00:00WAITING FOR "COMM" BD
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2007-02-22 Cont ID  
Sent By tgordon Date 2007-02-22 Time 09:46 Rev Time 0.45
Received By tgordon Date 2007-02-22 Time 09:45 Sent To  
Notes
2007-02-22 09:59:56NO MECHANICAL PLANS SUBMITTED, AND NO
 MECHANICAL PERMIT NUMBER APPLIED FOR AT
 THIS TIME.
 SEE MECHANICAL REVIEW NOTES FROM 07/25/2005.
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2006-02-06 Cont ID  
Sent By rregueir Date 2006-02-06 Time 19:20 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rregueir Date 2006-02-06 Time 19:09 Sent To  
Notes
2006-02-06 00:00:00SAME AS BEFORE.NEED SEPARATE PLANS AND
 APPLICATIONS FOR EACH OF THE FOLLOWING:
 A/C, WALK-IN COOLER, KITCHEN HOOD, HOOD
 SUPPRESSION SYSTEM.
  
 RONALD J REGUEIRO
 561.805.6734
 [email protected]
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2005-07-25 Cont ID  
Sent By hmoser Date 2005-07-25 Time 08:09 Rev Time 0.00
Received By hmoser Date 2005-07-25 Time 07:51 Sent To  
Notes
2005-07-25 00:00:001) PLEASE HAVE MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR
 SUBMIT PLANS AT TIME OF APPLICATION.
 2) ADDITIONAL PERMITS REQUIRED FOR WALK
 IN COLLER & FREEZER,KITCHEN HOOD ANR
 HOOD SUPPRESSION.
 PLAN REVIEW BY HAROLD MOSER 561-805-6732
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 5 Status F Date 2007-07-09 Cont ID  
Sent By kstevens Date 2007-07-09 Time 18:01 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kstevens Date 2007-07-09 Time 18:01 Sent To  
Notes
2007-07-09 18:32:27DENIED
 REFERENCE: FBC-2001 PLUMBING
 FBC-2001 CHAPTER 1
 FLORIDA STATUTES
  
 FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS: THE COMMENT NUMBER SHALL REMAIN
 THE SAME TO AVOID CONFUSION.
 ******FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS:
  
 1. ADDRESSED
 2. OK
  
 3. CONTACT DEPT OF BUSINESS REGULATION HOTEL &
 RESTAURANT DIVISION. PROVIDE THEIR COMMENT SHEET AND
 TWO SETS OF STAMPED PLANS. NO COMMENT, WORK SHEETSNOT
 INCLUDED.
 ****RESONSE NOTED, BUT ONE STAMPED SHEET FROM DBPR WITH
 THE TWO PAGE "WORKSHEETS" ATTACHED SHALL BE SUBMITTED
 IN EACH SET OF PLANS. SECTION 101.4.7.-ONLY ONE
 STAMPED SHEET HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, AND THAT IS ON AN OLD
 SET OF PLANS THAT WILL NOT BE APPROVED. PLEASE COMPLY
 WITH REQUIRED STAMPED PAGES AND "WORKSHEETS".
 ******RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE DBPR FOOD SERVICE STAMP
 IS NOT ON THE MOST RECENT SET OF PLAN AS WELL AS THE
 "WORKSHEETS" AS REQUESTED.
  
 4. ADDRESSED
  
 5. PROVIDE A WATER RISER ISOMETRIC SHOWING ALL FIXTURE
 CONNECTIONS. BACKFLOW PREVENTER REQUIRED AT WATER
 METER.
 ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE WATER ISOMETRIC DOES NOT
 REFLECT THE FLOOR PLAN. RISER INDICATES A BACKFLOW
 PREVENTER AND ALSO A BACKFLOW. PLEASE CLARIFY. -THE
 RISER SHOWS 3 W/C'S & 4 LAVS, WHEREAS THE FLOOR PLAN
 ONLY SHOWS TWO W/C'S AND TWO LAV'S.-THE MOP SINK IS
 NOT INDICATED ON THE RISER.-THE W/C & LAV IN THE
 SECOND TOILET ROOM ARE NOT SHOWN IN THE SAME ORDER ON
 THE RISER DIAGRAM AS SHOWN ON THE PLUMBING PLAN, (FLOOR
 PLAN).-PLEASE IDENTIFY ALL FIXTURES ON THE WATER
 RISER ISOMETRIC DIAGRAM. SECTION 104.2.1.
 ******RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE RISER DIAGRAM STILL DOES
 NOT REFLECT THE FLOOR PLAN. THE LAVS AND W/CS ARE BACK
 TO BACK IN SEPARATE TOILET ROOMS, NOT LINED UP ON ONE
 COMMON WALL. ALSO AS DRAWN, THE WATER SUPPLY IS
 INSTALLED UNDERGROUND AND THE WATER STUBBED UP THROUGH
 THE FLOOR. THIS WORKS EXCEPT FOR THEWATER HEATER
 WHICH IS IN A LOFT ABOVE THE COOLER/FREEZER. AS DRAWN
 THE WATER HEATER WOULD BE BELOW GROUND. A RISER TO THE
 LOFT FOR THE WATER HEATER IS REQUIRED TO REFLECT THE
 FLOOR PLAN.
  
 6. NEW COMMENT PLUMBING ISOMETRIC DOES NOT MATCH THE
 FLOOR PLAN..
 ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE SANITARY RISER ISOMETRIC
 DIAGRAM STILL DOES NOT REFLECT THE FLOOR PLAN. THE
 FLOOR SINK FOR THE ICE MAKER IS SHOWN CONNECTING TO THE
 GREASE SYSTEM ON THE FLOOR PLAN, BUT IS SHOWN ON THE
 SANITARY SYSTEM ON THE RISER DIAGRAM.-THREE FLOOR
 DRAINS AND ONE HAND SINK ARE ON A SEPARATE BRANCH LINE
 ON THE FLOOR PLAN, BUT ARE ON THE SAME BRANCH LINE WITH
 THE THREE COMPARTMENT SINK ON THE RISER DIAGRAM.- THE
 MOP SINK IS SHOWN BY THE THREE COMPARTMENT SINK ON THE
 RISER DIAGRAM, BUT SHOWN BY THE TOILET ROOMS ON THE
 FLOOR PLAN.-IDENTIFY ALL FIXTURES ON THE RISER
 DIAGRAM AND CORRELATE ALL INFORMATION BETWEEN THE FLOOR
 PLAN AND THE RISER DIAGRAM.-SHOW ALL PIPE SIZES.-
 (SEE ATTACHED SHEET FOR AN EXAMPLE OF A RISER DIAGRAM
 THAT REFLECTS THE FLOOR PLAN AND MEETS CODE
 REQUIREMENTS).
 ******RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE RISER DIAGRAM STILL DOES
 NOT REFLECT THE FLOOR PLAN, NOR DOES IT MEET CODE
 REQUIREMENTS. THE RISER DIAGRAM SHOWS 2 EXTRA LAVS NOT
 SHOWN ON THE FLOOR PLAN.--THE BRANCH LINES
 INDICATED ON THE FLOOR PLAN ARE NOT REFLECTED ON THE
 RISER DIAGRAM AS INDICATED PREVIOUSLY. --THERE ARE
 TWO DRAIN LINES CONNECTING TO THE FLOOR SINK IN THE
 WAITRESS STATION.--THE MOP SINK SHALL BE VENTED.
 SECTIONS 106.1.1, 1002.1. THE RISER DIAGRAM SENT AS AN
 EXAMPLE WAS NOT REFERENCED WHEN REDRAWING THE SANT.
 RISER DIAGRAM.
  
 7. SHT 2, NOTES FROM PREVIOUS PLAN REVIEWER, JOHN LEECH
 DENIED
  
 NEW COMMENTS:
  
 1.OK
 2. OK
 3. OK
 4. OK
 5. OK
  
 ************NEW COMMENTS************
  
 1C. SHT P-1 SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR THE WATER PIPE
 SIZING PER SECTION 604.3.
 ******RESPONSE NOTED, BUT NO CALCULATIONS WERE FOUND ON
 SHT P-1.
  
 2C. OK
  
 3C. SHT P-1 THE FLOOR DRAIN LOCATED WITHIN THE WALK IN
 COOLER SHALL BE INDIRECTLY CONNECTED TO THE SANITARY
 SYSTEM BY AN AIR GAP. SECTION 802.1.2.
 ******RESPONSE NOTED, BUT IT STILL APPEARS TO BE
 CONNECTED DIRECTLY TO THE FLOOR SINK. PLEASE SUBMIT A
 DETAIL SHOWING THE INDIRECT WAST CONNECTION TO THE
 FLOOR SINK AS WELL AS THE REQUIRED 4" AIR GAP.
  
 4C. SEE ATTACHED SHEET CONCERNING THE DESIGN
 PROFESSIONAL AND FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B). THIS IS
 GIVEN AS A ONE TIME NOTICE.
 ******A FOUR TIMES THE FEE WOULD HAVE BEEN ASSESSED
 THIS TIME, BUT THE ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEWER HAS
 ASSESSED THE FEE. IF THE PLANS ARE SUBMITTED AGAIN AND
 THE SAME COMMENTS ARE STILL NOT ADDRESSED, THEN ANOTHER
 FOUR TIMES THE FEE WILL BE ASSESSED.
  
 ************NEW COMMENT************
  
 1D. THERMAL EXPANSION CONTROL IS REQUIRED PER SECTION
 607.3.2. INDICATE THE METHOD OF COMPLIANCE.
  
 REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS
 (561) 805-6721
 FAX (561) 805-6731
 E-MAIL [email protected]
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2007-02-28 Cont ID  
Sent By kstevens Date 2007-02-28 Time 07:23 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kstevens Date 2007-02-27 Time 16:57 Sent To  
Notes
2007-02-28 09:09:05DENIED
 REFERENCE: FBC-2001 PLUMBING
 FBC-2001 CHAPTER 1
 FLORIDA STATUTES
  
 FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS: THE COMMENT NUMBER SHALL REMAIN
 THE SAME TO AVOID CONFUSION.
  
 1. ADDRESSED
 2. OK
  
 3. CONTACT DEPT OF BUSINESS REGULATION HOTEL &
 RESTAURANT DIVISION. PROVIDE THEIR COMMENT SHEET AND
 TWO SETS OF STAMPED PLANS. NO COMMENT, WORK SHEETSNOT
 INCLUDED.
 ****RESONSE NOTED, BUT ONE STAMPED SHEET FROM DBPR WITH
 THE TWO PAGE "WORKSHEETS" ATTACHED SHALL BE SUBMITTED
 IN EACH SET OF PLANS. SECTION 101.4.7.-ONLY ONE
 STAMPED SHEET HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, AND THAT IS ON AN OLD
 SET OF PLANS THAT WILL NOT BE APPROVED. PLEASE COMPLY
 WITH REQUIRED STAMPED PAGES AND "WORKSHEETS".
  
 4. ADDRESSED
  
 5. PROVIDE A WATER RISER ISOMETRIC SHOWING ALL FIXTURE
 CONNECTIONS. BACKFLOW PREVENTER REQUIRED AT WATER
 METER.
 ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE WATER ISOMETRIC DOES NOT
 REFLECT THE FLOOR PLAN. RISER INDICATES A BACKFLOW
 PREVENTER AND ALSO A BACKFLOW. PLEASE CLARIFY. -THE
 RISER SHOWS 3 W/C'S & 4 LAVS, WHEREAS THE FLOOR PLAN
 ONLY SHOWS TWO W/C'S AND TWO LAV'S.-THE MOP SINK IS
 NOT INDICATED ON THE RISER.-THE W/C & LAV IN THE
 SECOND TOILET ROOM ARE NOT SHOWN IN THE SAME ORDER ON
 THE RISER DIAGRAM AS SHOWN ON THE PLUMBING PLAN, (FLOOR
 PLAN).-PLEASE IDENTIFY ALL FIXTURES ON THE WATER
 RISER ISOMETRIC DIAGRAM. SECTION 104.2.1.
  
 6. NEW COMMENT PLUMBING ISOMETRIC DOES NOT MATCH THE
 FLOOR PLAN..
 ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE SANITARY RISER ISOMETRIC
 DIAGRAM STILL DOES NOT REFLECT THE FLOOR PLAN. THE
 FLOOR SINK FOR THE ICE MAKER IS SHOWN CONNECTING TO THE
 GREASE SYSTEM ON THE FLOOR PLAN, BUT IS SHOWN ON THE
 SANITARY SYSTEM ON THE RISER DIAGRAM.-THREE FLOOR
 DRAINS AND ONE HAND SINK ARE ON A SEPARATE BRANCH LINE
 ON THE FLOOR PLAN, BUT ARE ON THE SAME BRANCH LINE WITH
 THE THREE COMPARTMENT SINK ON THE RISER DIAGRAM.- THE
 MOP SINK IS SHOWN BY THE THREE COMPARTMENT SINK ON THE
 RISER DIAGRAM, BUT SHOWN BY THE TOILET ROOMS ON THE
 FLOOR PLAN.-IDENTIFY ALL FIXTURES ON THE RISER
 DIAGRAM AND CORRELATE ALL INFORMATION BETWEEN THE FLOOR
 PLAN AND THE RISER DIAGRAM.-SHOW ALL PIPE SIZES.-
 (SEE ATTACHED SHEET FOR AN EXAMPLE OF A RISER DIAGRAM
 THAT REFLECTS THE FLOOR PLAN AND MEETS CODE
 REQUIREMENTS).
  
 7. SHT 2, NOTES FROM PREVIOUS PLAN REVIEWER, JOHN LEECH
 DENIED
  
 NEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE WATER HEATER. IF THE WATER
 HEATER IS OUTSIDE, IT MUST BE PROTECTED FROM THE
 WEATHER OR BE APPROVED BY THE MANUFACTURE FOR OUTSIDE
 INSTALLATION.
 ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE WATER HEATER IS NOT SHOWN
 ON THE FLOOR PLAN/PLUMBING PLAN.
  
 2. OK
 3. OK
  
 4. FLOOR SINK REQUIRED AT WAITRESS STATION FOR INDIRECT
 WASTED.
 ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE SINK IS STILL SHOWN
 DIRECTLY CONNECTED TO THE WASTE SYSTEM. SECTIONS 802.1
 & 802.1.1
  
 5. OK
  
 ************NEW COMMENTS************
  
 1C. SHT P-1 SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR THE WATER PIPE
 SIZING PER SECTION 604.3.
  
 2C. SHT P-1 THE PLUMBING PLAN SHOWS 3" FLOOR DRAINS
 CONNECTING TO 2" BRANCH LINES. PIPE CAN NOT BE REDUCED
 IN SIZE IN THE DIRECTION OF FLOW. SECTION 704.2.
  
 3C. SHT P-1 THE FLOOR DRAIN LOCATED WITHIN THE WALK IN
 COOLER SHALL BE INDIRECTLY CONNECTED TO THE SANITARY
 SYSTEM BY AN AIR GAP. SECTION 802.1.2.
  
 4C. SEE ATTACHED SHEET CONCERNING THE DESIGN
 PROFESSIONAL AND FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B). THIS IS
 GIVEN AS A ONE TIME NOTICE.
  
 REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS
 (561) 805-6721
 FAX (561) 805-6731
 E-MAIL [email protected]
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2006-10-28 Cont ID  
Sent By pschmitz Date 2006-10-28 Time 07:35 Rev Time 0.00
Received By pschmitz Date 2006-10-28 Time 07:35 Sent To  
Notes
2006-10-28 07:39:46PAUL SCHMITZ, PLUMBING & GAS PLANS
 EXAMINER561-805-6692
  
 [email protected]
 PLUMBING GAS PLAN REVIEW FBC 2001
  
 DENIED
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING.
 PLEASE INCLUDE A RESPONCE LETTER INDICATING HOW THE
 ITEMS WERE ADDRESSED, THIS WILL HELP TO EXPIDITE THE
 PLAN REVIEW.
  
  
  
 (1)ADRESSED
  
 (2) CONTACT MS LYNN MASSON, WEST PALM
 BEACH ENVIROMENTAL COMPLIANCE
 FOR GREASE TRAP SIZING REQUIRMENTS.
 LOCAL ORDANCE. PHONE 561-822-2271
 NEW COMMENT, GREASE TRAP SIZE ON PLANS INCORRECT
  
 (3) CONTACT DEPT OF BUSINESS REGULATION
 HOTEL & RESTURANT DIVISION
 PROVIDE THEIR COMMENT SHEET AND TWO SETS
 OF STAMPED PLANS.
 NEW COMMENT,WORK SHEETS NOT INCLUDED.
  
 (4) ADDRESSED
  
 (5)PROVIDE A WATER RISER ISOMETRIC SHOWING
 ALL FIXTURE CONNECTIONS.BACK FLOW PREVENTER REQUIRED
 AT WATER METER.
  
 (6) NEW COMMENT PLUMBING ISOMETRIC DOES NOT MATCH FLOOR
 PLAN.
  
 (7) SHT 2,
 NOTES FROM PREVOIOUS PLAN REVIEWER, JOHN LEECH DENIED
  
 NEW COMMENTS;
 1.SHOW LOCATION OF WATER HEATER. IF WATER HEATER IS OUT
 SIDE IT MUST BE PROTECTED FROM THE WEATHER OR BE
 APPROVED BY THE MANUFATURE FOR OUT SIDE INSTALLATION.
  
 2.MOP SINK MUST GO TO GREASY WASTE.
  
 3.DISHWASHER MUST DISCHARGE INDIRECTLY TO , (FLOOR SINK
 )
  
 4.FLOOR SINK REQUIRED AT WAITRESS STATION FOR INDIRECT
 WASTE.
  
 5.THREE COMPARTMENT SINK SHOUD DISCHARGE TO A FLOOR
 SINK, SINK COULD BE USED FOR FOOD PREP. SEE PLUMBING
 CODE SEC. 802.1.1.
  
 END OF COMMENTS, QUESTIONS 561-805-6692
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2006-03-10 Cont ID  
Sent By jleech Date 2006-03-10 Time 08:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jleech Date 2006-03-10 Time 08:17 Sent To  
Notes
2006-03-10 00:00:00DENIED;
 ITEMS NOT COVERED FROM FIRST REVIEW;
 COMMENT #2 CONTACT MS LYNN MASSON, WEST
 PALM BEACH ENVIROMENT COMPLIANCE FOR
 GREASE TRAP SIZING REQUIRMENTS. LOCAL
 ORDANCE. PHONE (561) 822-2271.
 COMMENT # 3 HOTEL AND RESTURANT DIVISION
 WORK SHEETS WERE NOT ATACHED TO PLANS.
 COMMENT # 4 DISHWASHER TO DRAIN TO
 SANITARY SEWER (NOT SHOWN ON RISER
 DIAGRAM. WATER RISER DIAGRAM NOT SHOWN.
 BACKFLOW NOT SHOWN ON PLANS.
 COMMENT # 5 GAS REQUIREMENTS, TYPE OF
 GAS NATURAL OR L.P., LIST TOTAL BTU'S
 AND LONGEST RUN. END OF COMMENTS FROM
 FIRST REVIEW.
 NEW COMMENTS;
 1.SHOW LOCATION OF WATER HEATER. IF
 WATER HEATER IS OUT SIDE IT MUST BE
 PROTECTED FROM THE WEATHER OR BE
 APPROVED BY THE MANUFATURE FOR OUT SIDE
 INSTALLATION.
 2.MOP SINK MUST GO TO GREASY WASTE.
 3.DISHWASHER MUST DISCHARGE INDIRECTLY
 TO SANITARY, (FLOOR SINK REQUIRED)
 4.FLOOR SINK REQUIRED AT WAITRESS
 STATION FOR INDIRECT WASTE.
 5.THREE COMPARTMENT SINK SHOUD DISCHARGE
 TO A FLOOR SINK, SINK COULD BE USED FOR
 FOOD PREP. SEE PLUMBING CODE SEC.
 802.1.1.
 6.GAS SYSTEM IS REQUIRED TO HAVE A
 EMERGENCY SHUT OFF VALVE FOR COOKING
 EQUIPMENT. A SHUTOFF VALVE IS REQUIRED
 UP STREAM STREAM OF THE EMERGENCY VALVE
 AND A UNION DOWN STREAM SO VALVE CAN BE
 REPLACED OR REPAIRED.
 PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW BY;
 JOHN LEECH
 805-6695
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2005-07-30 Cont ID  
Sent By pschmitz Date 2005-07-30 Time 13:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By pschmitz Date 2005-07-30 Time 13:15 Sent To Z
Notes
2005-07-30 00:00:00PAUL SCHMITZ, PLUMBING & GAS PLANS
 EXAMINER561-805-6692
  
 [email protected]
 PLUMBING GAS PLAN REVIEW FBC 2001
 DENIED
 (1) ?3401.2.2 CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY
 ?3401.2.2.1 IF THE OCCUPANCY
 CLASSIFICATION OR OCCUPANCY
 SUBCLASSIFICATIONS OF ANY EXISTING
 BUILDING OR STRUCTURE IS CHANGED, THE
 BUILDING, ELECTRICAL, GAS,
 MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING SYSTEMS SHALL BE
 MADE TO CONFORM TO THE INTENT OF THE
 TECHNICAL CODES AS REQUIRED BY THE
 BUILDING OFFICIAL.
 ?3401.2.2.2 CHANGES IN THE OCCUPANCY
 OF A BUILDING NOW EXISTING OR
 HEREAFTER ERECTED SHALL NOT BE MADE
 UNTIL A REVISED CERTIFICATE OF
 OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN ISSUED BY THE
 BUILDING OFFICIAL CERTIFYING THAT THE
 FLOORS ARE SUITABLE FOR THE LOADS CHARACTERISTIC OF
 THE PROPOSED
 OCCUPANCY.SEE ?106.
 (2) CONTACT MS LYNN MASSON, WEST PALM
 BEACH ENVIROMENTAL COMPLIANCE
 FOR GREASE TRAP SIZING REQUIRMENTS.
 LOCAL ORDANCE. PHONE 561-822-2271
 (3) CONTACT DEPT OF BUSINESS REGULATION
 HOTEL & RESTURANT DIVISION
 PROVIDE THEIR COMMENT SHEET AND TWO SETS
 OF STAMPED PLANS.
 (4) ?P403.2 SEPARATE FACILITIES. WHERE
 PLUMBING FIXTURES ARE REQUIRED,
 SEPARATE FACILITIES SHALL BE PROVIDED
 FOR EACH SEX.
 EXCEPTIONS:
 2. SEPARATE EMPLOYEE FACILITIES SHALL
 NOT BE REQUIRED IN OCCUPANCIES IN
 WHICH 15 OR LESS PEOPLE ARE
 EMPLOYED.
 3. SEPARATE FACILITIES SHALL NOT BE
 REQUIRED FOR FOOD SERVICE
 ESTABLISHMENTS WHICH SEAT 10
 PERSONS OR LESS.
 ?P403.3 NUMBER OF OCCUPANTS OF EACH SEX.
 THE REQUIRED WATER CLOSETS,
 LAVATORIES, AND SHOWERS OR BATHTUBS
 SHALL BE DISTRIBUTED EQUALLY BETWEEN
 THE SEXES BASED ON THE PERCENTAGE OF
 EACH SEX ANTICIPATED IN THE OCCUPANT
 LOAD.THE OCCUPANT LOAD SHALL BE
 COMPOSED OF 50 PERCENT OF EACH SEX,
 UNLESS STATISTICAL DATA APPROVED BY THE
 CODE OFFICIAL INDICATE A DIFFERENT
 DISTRIBUTION OF THE SEXES.(SEE ALSO
 ?P403.1.1)
 (4) SHT A1.1 PLUMBING ISOMETRIC.DENIED
 KITCHEN AREA EQUIPMENT DRAIN TO GREASE
 WASTE SYSTEM.
 DISH WASHER DRAIN TO SANITARY SEWER.
 REST ROOM WASTE TO SANITARY SEWER.
 PROVIDE A WATER RISER ISOMETRIC SHOWING
 ALL FIXTURE CONNECTIONS.
 BACK FLOW PREVENTER REQUIRED AT METER.
 (5) PROVIDE A GAS PIPING ISOMETRIC
 SUBMIT AN ISOMETRIC DRAWING THAT
 CLEARLY SHOWS ALL CUT SECTIONS OF PIPE
 AND CORRESPONDING LENGTHS PER FBC-2001
 FUEL GAS CODE.
 SHOW TYPE OF PIPING MATERIAL BEING
 INSTALLED, ALL PIPE SIZES, (AND THE EDH
 NUMBER OF CORRUGATED STAINLESS STEEL
 TUBING FOR EACH PIPE SIZE BEING USED.
 TYPE OF GAS, (LP OR NATURAL)
 BTU LOAD OF EACH APPLIANCE AND THE
 TOTAL BTU LOAD ON THE SYSTEM. REFER TO
 THE FBC-2001 FUEL GAS CODE SECS. 401.8
 THRU 402.5.2 AND TABLES 402(1) THRU
 402(34).
 SHOW THE DISTANCE FROM THE POINT OF
 DELIVERY, (METER), TO THE MOST REMOTE
 OUTLET IN THE BUILDING AND/OR SYSTEM PER
 FBC-2001 FUEL GAS CODE APPENDIX A - USE
 OF CAPACITY TABLES (A)(3).
 INDICATE THE DELIVERY PRESSURE (PSI)
 PER FBC-2001 FUEL GAS CODE SEC. 402.2.
 NATURAL GAS SPECIFY .5 PSI OR 2 PSI.
 SUBMIT MANUFACTURE SHEETS FOR ALL GAS
 EQUIPMENT TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH
 STANDARDS NFPA 54, NFPA 58, AND THE
 FBC-2001 FUEL GAS CODE SEC 402.2
  
 END OF COMMENTS
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 5 Status F Date 2007-06-08 Cont ID  
Sent By adavila Date 2007-06-08 Time 16:16 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adavila Date 2007-06-07 Time 16:36 Sent To  
Notes
2007-06-08 16:16:58PLANNING AND ZONING
  
 ***FAILED***
  
 FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW:
  
 1. PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE TO COMMENTS IN WRITING.
  
 2. PLEASE PROVIDE A SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY.THE SURVEY
 SHALL BE LESS THAN A YEAR OLD.
  
 3. DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAIL DOES NOT MEET ZONING
 REGULATIONS.PLEASE REFER TO SECTION 94-444(B) FOR
 OUTDOOR STORAGE REGULATIONS.
  
 NEW COMMENTS:
  
 4. PROVIDE A LETTER AND PLANS STAMPED APPROVED FROM THE
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT APPROVING THE SIZE AND
 LOCATION OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE.
  
 5. PER THE FINAL ORDER DATED FEBRUARY 3, 2005, GRANTING
 THE CLASS B SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO OPERATE A RESTAURANT
 IN AN EXISTING COMMERCIAL BUILDING, THE FOLLOWING SHALL
 BE PROVIDED
 A. A COPY OF THE RECORDED UNITY OF TITLE OF ALL LOTS
 ASSOCIATED WITH THE SUBJECT PROPERTY
 (74-43-43-16-17-001-0131, 74-43-43-16-17-001-0132, AND
 74-43-43-16-17-001-0150).
 B. A COPY OF THE SITE PLAN APPROVAL LETTER.IN THE
 EVENT THAT A SITE PLAN REVIEW HAS NOT BEEN APPROVED,
 THE PROJECT SHALL FOLLOW THE INFORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW
 PROCESS.
  
 6. FROM THE FINAL ORDER DATED FEBRUARY 3, 2005:
  
 ??THERE WAS A MOTION FOR APPROVAL TO GRANT THE CLASS B
 SPECIAL USE PERMIT, TO OPERATE A RESTAURANT IN AN
 EXISTING COMMERCIAL BUILDING IS HEREBY GRANTED, WITH
 THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
  
 A. APPLICANT MUST APPLY FOR AN INFORMAL SITE PLAN
 REVIEW;
 B. UNITY OF TITLE MUST BE FILED AND RECORDED WITH PALM
 BEACH COUNTY TO JOIN ALL LOTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE
 SUBJECT PROPERTY;
 C. RESTAURANT MAY NOT EXPAND IN NET INTERIOR AREA??
  
 7. A COPY OF THE FINAL ORDER MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE
 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT.
  
 COMMENTS/QUESTIONS, CONTACT ANDREINA DAVILA Q. OR ERIC
 SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER, AT 822-1435.
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2007-02-12 Cont ID  
Sent By adavila Date 2007-02-12 Time 12:26 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adavila Date 2007-02-12 Time 12:26 Sent To  
Notes
2007-02-12 12:32:15PLANNING AND ZONING
  
 ***FAILED***
  
 1) PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE TO COMMENTS IN WRITING.
  
 2) PLEASE PROVIDE A SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY.THE SURVEY
 SHALL BE LESS THAN A YEAR OLD.
  
 3) DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAIL DOES NOT MEET ZONING
 REGULATIONS.PLEASE REFER TO SECTION 94-444(B) FOR
 OUTDOOR STORAGE REGULATIONS.
  
 COMMENTS/QUESTIONS, CONTACT ANDREINA DAVILA AT (561)
 822-1435.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2006-11-09 Cont ID  
Sent By adavila Date 2006-11-09 Time 09:41 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adavila Date 2006-11-09 Time 08:33 Sent To  
Notes
2006-11-09 09:10:0211/09/2006 PLANNING AND ZONING ***FAILED***
  
 1) PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PROPERTY HAS ALREADY
 INSUFFICIENT PARKING SPACES FOR THE CURRENT USES. THUS,
 THE PROPOSED DUMPSTER CAN NOT BE PLACED ON A PARKING
 SPACE AS IT WILL REDUCE THE NUMBER OF EXISTING PARKING
 SPACES AND INCREASE ITS NONCONFORMITY.
  
 2) DUMPSTER WITH ENCLOSURE SHALL BE RELOCATED ON THE
 SITE.
 A) PLEASE CONTACT PUBLIC UTILITIES FOR ALTERNATIVE
 LOCATIONS.A SIGN-OFF FROM PUBLIC UTILITIES SHALL BE
 REQUIRED ONCE A LOCATION HAS BEEN DETERMINED.
  
 3) PLEASE PROVIDE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAILS MEETING
 SECTION 94-444(B) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS.
  
 COMMENTS/QUESTIONS, CONTACT ANDREINA DAVILA AT (561)
 822-1435.
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2006-04-06 Cont ID  
Sent By mmclean Date 2006-04-06 Time 17:00 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mmclean Date 2006-04-06 Time 17:00 Sent To I
Notes
2006-04-06 00:00:00RE-STAMP PLANS.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2005-08-17 Cont ID  
Sent By mmclean Date 2005-08-17 Time 10:44 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mmclean Date 2005-08-17 Time 10:44 Sent To  
Notes
2005-08-17 00:00:00NOTE: PARKING LOT MUST BE DOUBLED
 STRIPPED/REPAIR EXISTING FENCE. SHIRLEY
 GRAHAM, ASSOCIATE PLANNER 822-1435 MM


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved