| 2005-09-04 00:00:00 | ********** UNSAT 3RD REVIEW ********* |
| | |
| | PLEASE SEE SOME NOTES FROM PREVIOUS |
| | REVIEW AND PLEASE SEE SOME NEW NOTES DUE |
| | TO CHANGES IN PLANS ONCE AGAIN. |
| | |
| | |
| | 1)NOTE: PLEASE SEE PLANS NOW HAVE |
| | REVISED TITLE BLOCKS SIGNED AND SEALED |
| | BY AN ENGINEER, HOWEVER PLEASE SEE SOME |
| | ELECTRICAL SHEETS CONTAIN THE PRINTED |
| | ENGINEER OF RECORD TO BE GUILLERMO NUNEZ |
| | AND PLANS ARE SIGNED AND SEALED BY A |
| | DIFFERENT ENGINEER??? |
| | PLEASE SEE FAC 61G15-23.002 FOR REQUIRED |
| | INFORMATION TO BE ON TITLE BLOCKS. |
| | *************************************** |
| | PLEASE ALSO SEE MISSING CERTIFICATE OF |
| | AUTHORIZATION NUMBER REQUIRED FOR |
| | ENGINEERING FIRM AS SHOWN. FS 471.023 |
| | PLEASE KNOW, TITLE BLOCKS ARE REQUIRED |
| | TO BE CORRECTED FOR ALL SHEETS AND FOR |
| | ALL TRADES, WHETHER OR NOT COMMENT IS |
| | MADE BY OTHER REVIEWER(S). |
| | PLEASE SEE A SIGNED, DATED AND SEALED |
| | LETTER FROM ARCHITECT WAS NOT SUBMITTED |
| | AS PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED. |
| | NOTORY SHOULD BE SURE TO NOTORIZE LETTER |
| | AS REQUIRED UNDER FS 117.05 |
| | (SEE NOTE #2) |
| | |
| | *************************************** |
| | |
| | PLEASE SEE ONE ENTIRE SET OF PLANS (ALL |
| | TRADES) IS BEING RETAINED AND WILL NOW |
| | BE TURNED OVER TO THE FLORIDA BOARD OF |
| | PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS ANDSTATES LEGAL |
| | COUNSEL TO THE FLORIDA BOARD OF |
| | ARCHITECTS FOR REVIEW OF LICENSING |
| | DISCREPANCIES AND CODE COMPLIANCE. |
| | PLEASE SEE A REVIEW MAY ALSO BE DONE FOR |
| | PLANS AND CODE COMPLIANCE INFORMATION. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING COMMENT. |
| | |
| | **************************************** |
| | |
| | 2)NOTE: PLEASE SEE THAT NOTES WERE GIVEN |
| | BY MULTIPLE REVIEWERS ON PREVIOUS REVIEW |
| | WITH REFERENCE TO FS 553.80(2)(B) WITH |
| | RESPECT TO DESIGN PROFESSIONALS AND |
| | PLANS BEING REVIEWED THREE OR MORE TIMES |
| | WITH ANY OF THE SAME COMMENTS NOT BEING |
| | ADDRESSED. PLEASE SEE COMMENTS BELOW AS |
| | SOME COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS TWO REVIEWS |
| | STILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED. PLEASE SEE |
| | THAT A 4X FEE HAS NOW BEEN ASSESSED FOR |
| | PLAN REVIEW PER ABOVE MENTIONED FS |
| | 553.80 AND A FEE OF $1500.00 MUST BE |
| | PAID BEFORE THE PLANS MAY BE SUBMITTED |
| | FOR NEXT REVIEW. |
| | PLEASE KNOW, IF PLANS COME BACK IN FOR |
| | 4TH REVIEW WITH ANY OF THE SAME COMMENTS |
| | FROMPREVIOUS 3 REVIEWS NOT ADDRESSED |
| | AN ADDTIONAL 4X FEE WILL BE ASSESSED. |
| | THIS STANDS FOR ALL REVIEWS AFTER 3RD |
| | SUCH REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 2)NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE A SIGNED, DATED |
| | AND SEALED NOTORIZED LETTER FOR LEGAL |
| | SIGNATURE VERIFICATION OF ARCHITECT. |
| | OTHER SHEETS APPEAR TO BE SIGNED WITH |
| | INITIALS, IF INDEED THIS IS THE LEGAL |
| | SIGNATURE, PLEASE PROVIDE LETTER AS |
| | STATED ABOVE. PLEASE BE SURE LETTER IS |
| | PROPERLY NOTORIZED AS REQUIRED UNDER FS |
| | 117. |
| | |
| | 3)NOTE:PLEASE SHOW LOCATION OF |
| | EXISTING SERVICE ON "SERVICE POWER SITE |
| | PLAN". |
| | PLEASE SEE THE "SITE POWER PLAN" HAS NOW |
| | BEEN REMOVED AND GROUPING OF MAINS CAN |
| | NOT BE VERIFIED AT THIS TIME. |
| | PLEASE SEE GROUPING OF MAINS WILL BE |
| | REQUIRED 230.72. |
| | |
| | 4)NOTE: PLEASE SEE THAT SERVICE IS NOW |
| | INDICATING A NEW 600A SERVICE, MAIN DISC |
| | AND PANEL. |
| | PLEASE SEE MISSING EQUIPMENT GROUNDING |
| | CONDUCTORS FROM 600A MAIN TO 600A PANEL. |
| | PLEASE SEE 250.122 FOR SIZING FOR EACH |
| | OF THE THREE PARALLEL RUNS SHOWN. |
| | 250.110 |
| | PLEASE ALSO SEE MISSING EQUIPMENT |
| | GROUNDING METHOD TO SUB PANEL "B". |
| | *NOTE*EMT MAY NOT BE USEDAS AN |
| | EQUIPMENT GROUNDING METHID UNLESS ALL |
| | FITTINGS USEDARE THE NEW FITTINGS NOW |
| | LISTED AS APPROVED FOR "EQUIPMENT |
| | GROUNDING" |
| | |
| | 5)NOTE: PLEASE CORRELATE AWG SHOWN FOR |
| | SAME SUB FEED TO PANEL "B". #3, #1? |
| | 240.4,310.16,215.5 |
| | |
| | 6)NOTE: PLEASE SEE SPECS/MANUFACTURE |
| | SHEETS FOR ALL TANNING BEDS/ EQUIPMENT |
| | PROPOSED WAS NOT SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW OF |
| | THE LISTINGS REQUIRED PER NEC 110.3B, |
| | ALL LISTINGS MUST BE BY A NATIONAL |
| | RECOGNIZED TESTING LABORATORY. (NRTL). |
| | PLANS MENTIONS INSTALLATION OF |
| | TRANSFORMER FOR THIS EQUIPMENT, HOWEVER |
| | THIS IS NOT SHOWN ON PLANS AND EQUIPMENT |
| | CAN NOT BE VERIFIED FOR INSTALLATION. |
| | |
| | 7)NOTE: PLEASE SEE 250.50, PLEASE SHOW |
| | COLD WATER PIPE PART OF GROUNDING |
| | ELECTRODE SYSTEM. (IF METAL) RISER SHOWS |
| | A CONNECTION, HOWEVER THIS IS NOT CLEAR |
| | OR LABELED AS TO WHAT CONNECTION THIS |
| | MAY BE. |
| | PLANS MENTIONS TO EXISTING GROUNDING |
| | ELECTRODE SYSTEM, YET THIS CAN NOT |
| | VERIFIED AS NO DETAIL AS REQUIRED PER |
| | 250.50 IS SHOWN. |
| | PLEASE SEE FBC 104.2.1 WHICH STATES |
| | "TECHNICAL CODES SHALL NOT BE QUOTED IN |
| | LEIU OF PLANS/DETAILS" |
| | |
| | |
| | 8)NOTE: PLEASE SEE ON TWO PREVIOUS |
| | REVIEWS, IT WAS REQUESTED TO "REMOVE ALL |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS" AND ONLY INSERT NEW |
| | REVISED SHEETS INTO COMPLETE SETS FOR |
| | REVIEW AND STAMPING. |
| | PLEASE SEE ALL SETS HAVE COME BACK IN |
| | ONCE AGAIN WITH ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS |
| | STILL IN SETS. |
| | THIS MUST BE DONE BEFORE SUBMITTING |
| | PLANS FOR NEXT REVIEW. |
| | PLEASE BEAR IN MIND, ONE COMPLETE SET OF |
| | PLANS ARE BEING RETAINED BY THIS OFFICE. |
| | |
| | PLEASE BE SURE TO SEE ANY POSSIBLE |
| | COMMENTS FROM OTHER TRADES WHICH MAY |
| | AFFECT ELECTRICAL PLANS. |
| | |
| | PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMATION FOR |
| | REVIEW. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS, |
| | PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CALL. |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |