Plan Review Details - Permit 05031185
Plan Review Stops For Permit 05031185
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 9 Status F Date 2008-07-23 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 2008-07-23 Time 17:46 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 2008-07-23 Time 17:46 Sent To  
Notes
2008-07-23 17:50:25"TEMPORARY FAIL" STATUS:WILL BE CHANGED TO "PASS"
 WHEN ADDITIONAL PALM BEACH COUNTY IMPACT FEES ARE PAID
 FOR THE INCREASE IN FLOOR AREA.
  
  
 BUILDING PLAN REVIEW
 *******DENIED*******
 ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6652
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
 REVISION FOR INCREASE IN NUMBER OF STORIES FROM 5 TO 8
 STORIES.
  
 FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001
 FBC*= FLORIDA BUILD'G CODE (CITY AMEND)
 F.S.= FLORIDA (STATE) STATUTE
  
  
 IMPACT FEES. COMMENT RESPONSE, STATING THAT THE OWNER
 WILL PAY IMPACT FEES, IS NOTED AND THIS OFFICE WILL
 DROP THIS COMMENT ONCE THE FEES ARE PAID. PREVIOUS
 COMMENT (RE-STATED HERE FOR INFORMATION):THE PROPOSED
 INCREASE IN BUILDING AREA WILL INCREASE THE IMPACT FEES
 DUE.THE PLANS SHALL BE TAKEN TO PALM BEACH COUNTY
 BUILDING DEPARTMENT FOR CALCULATION OF THE ADDITIONAL
 IMPACT FEES. THEY SHALL BE STAMPED AT THAT OFFICE AND A
 COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF WEST
 PALM BEACH DEPT OF CONSTRUCTION SERVICES BEFORE THE
 REVISED PLANS CAN BE STAMPED.
  
  
 --PROVISO--
 FBC 13-103.3EXTERIOR DOORS ON ENERGY CALCULATIONS.
 SUBMIT REVISED ENERGY CALCULATIONS AND INPUT DATA
 REPORT SHOWING THE INPUT FOR ALL EXTERIOR DOORS.SHEET
 10 OF THE INPUT DATA REPORT DOES NOT CURRENTLY REFLECT
 THE NUMBER AND TYPE OF EXTERIOR DOORS SHOWN ON THE
 PLANS.
  
  
 **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE**
  
 END OF REVIEW COMMENTS
 THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO TELEPHONE:
 (561) 805 6652ROBERT BROWN
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 8 Status F Date 2008-07-12 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 2008-07-12 Time 12:34 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 2008-07-12 Time 12:34 Sent To  
Notes
2008-07-12 13:29:45"TEMPORARY FAIL" STATUS:FORMAL RESUBMITTAL IS NOT
 NECESSARY HOWEVER THE REVIEW WILL REMAIN IN TEMPORARY
 FAIL STATUS UNTIL COMMENT # 4 IS ADDRESSED AND THE
 ADDITIONAL PALM BEACH COUNTY IMPACT FEES ARE PAID FOR
 THE INCREASE IN FLOOR AREA.
  
  
 BUILDING PLAN REVIEW
 *******DENIED*******
 ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6652
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
 5TH REVIEW OF REVISION FOR INCREASE IN NUMBER OF
 STORIES FROM 5 TO 8 STORIES.
  
 FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001
 FBC*= FLORIDA BUILD'G CODE (CITY AMEND)
 F.S.= FLORIDA (STATE) STATUTE
  
  
 FOR CONSISTENCY, THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE NUMBERED AS
 PER THE BUILDING PLAN REVIEW OF 5/24/08:
  
  
 3)IMPACT FEES. COMMENT RESPONSE, STATING THAT THE
 OWNER WILL PAY IMPACT FEES, IS NOTED AND THIS OFFICE
 WILL DROP THIS COMMENT ONCE THE FEES ARE PAID. PREVIOUS
 COMMENT (RE-STATED HERE FOR INFORMATION):THE PROPOSED
 INCREASE IN BUILDING AREA WILL INCREASE THE IMPACT FEES
 DUE.THE PLANS SHALL BE TAKEN TO PALM BEACH COUNTY
 BUILDING DEPARTMENT FOR CALCULATION OF THE ADDITIONAL
 IMPACT FEES. THEY SHALL BE STAMPED AT THAT OFFICE AND A
 COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF WEST
 PALM BEACH DEPT OF CONSTRUCTION SERVICES BEFORE THE
 REVISED PLANS CAN BE STAMPED.
  
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENT CAN BE ADDRESSED WITHOUT FORMAL
 SUBMITTAL OF PLANS BUT IT MUST BE ADDRESSED BEFORE THE
 PLAN REVIEW CAN BE "PASSED":
  
 4) FBC 709.2.4COLUMN FIRE RESISTANCE RATING.SHEET
 S-9 HAS BEEN REVISED TO SHOW COLUMN TC-5 WITH ADEQUATE
 DIMENSIONS TO ACHIEVE THE REQUIRED 3 HOUR FIRE
 RESISTANCE RATING.HOWEVER THE SHEET WAS CORRECTED
 USING CORRECTION FLUID ("WITE-OUT").IT IS PERMISSIBLE
 FOR PLANS FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES TO BE REVISED BY THE
 DESIGNER OF RECORD USING HAND WRITTEN CHANGES PROVIDED
 THE DESIGNER OF RECORD SIGNS AND DATES NEXT TO EACH
 CHANGE, HOWEVER UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCE CAN CORRECTION
 FLUID BE USED FOR PLAN REVISION PURPOSES.ONCE THE
 PLANS ARE STAMPED THERE WOULD BE NO WAY FOR THE
 INSPECTOR TO KNOW IF THE CORRECTION FLUID WAS APPLIED
 BEFORE OR AFTER STAMPING ("PASSING") OF THE PLANS.THE
 ENGINEER SHALL SUBMIT THREE COPIES OF SHEET S-9 WITH
 THE DIMENSIONS OF COLUMN TC-5 REVISED AS PROPOSED. THIS
 COMMENT MAY BE ADDRESSED WITHOUT FORMAL RESUBMITTAL OF
 PLANS.THE CONTRACTOR CAN SIMPLY BRING THE REVISED
 SHEETS TO THIS OFFICE AND INSERT THEM INTO THE SETS.
  
  
 --PROVISO--
 FBC 13-103.3EXTERIOR DOORS ON ENERGY CALCULATIONS.
 SUBMIT REVISED ENERGY CALCULATIONS AND INPUT DATA
 REPORT SHOWING THE INPUT FOR ALL EXTERIOR DOORS.SHEET
 10 OF THE INPUT DATA REPORT DOES NOT CURRENTLY REFLECT
 THE NUMBER AND TYPE OF EXTERIOR DOORS SHOWN ON THE
 PLANS.
  
  
 **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE**
  
 END OF REVIEW COMMENTS
 THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO TELEPHONE:
 (561) 805 6652ROBERT BROWN
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 7 Status F Date 2008-05-24 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 2008-05-24 Time 13:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 2008-05-24 Time 13:17 Sent To  
Notes
2008-05-24 14:31:19BUILDING PLAN REVIEW
 *******DENIED*******
 ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6652
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
 4TH REVIEW OF REVISION FOR INCREASE IN NUMBER OF
 STORIES FROM 5 TO 8 STORIES.
  
 FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001
 FBC*= FLORIDA BUILD'G CODE (CITY AMEND)
 F.S.= FLORIDA (STATE) STATUTE
  
  
 FOR CONSISTENCY, THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE NUMBERED AS
 PER THE BUILDING PLAN REVIEW OF 3/4/08:
  
 3)IMPACT FEES. COMMENT RESPONSE, STATING THAT THE
 OWNER WILL PAY IMPACT FEES, IS NOTED AND THIS OFFICE
 WILL DROP THIS COMMENT ONCE THE FEES ARE PAID. PREVIOUS
 COMMENT (RE-STATED HERE FOR INFORMATION):THE PROPOSED
 INCREASE IN BUILDING AREA WILL INCREASE THE IMPACT FEES
 DUE.THE PLANS SHALL BE TAKEN TO PALM BEACH COUNTY
 BUILDING DEPARTMENT FOR CALCULATION OF THE ADDITIONAL
 IMPACT FEES. THEY SHALL BE STAMPED AT THAT OFFICE AND A
 COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF WEST
 PALM BEACH DEPT OF CONSTRUCTION SERVICES BEFORE THE
 REVISED PLANS CAN BE STAMPED.
  
 4) FBC TABLE 500ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT.FBC
 503.2.6 STATES THAT THE HEIGHT OF RESIDENTIAL
 OCCUPANCY, IN BUILDINGS OF TYPE II CONSTRUCTION, CAN BE
 UNLIMITED PROVIDED THE FIRE RESISTANCE OF ALL COLUMNS
 IS NOT LESS THAN 3 HOURS.YOUR COMMENT MOST RECENT
 RESPONSE LETTER HAS BEEN NOTED, HOWEVER COLUMN TC-5 ON
 SHEET S-9 DOES NOT HAVE TWO PARALLEL SIDES AT LEAST 36
 INCHES LONG. EVEN ALLOWING FOR BOTH LEGS OF THIS
 L-SHAPED COLUMN, ON SIDE IS 32 INCHES LONG.PREVIOUS
 COMMENT (RE-STATED HERE FOR INFORMATION):CONCRETE
 COLUMNS: SECTION 709.2.4 OF FBC 2001 REQUIRES A MINIMUM
 CONCRETE COLUMN DIMENSION OF 12 INCHES FOR A 3 HOUR
 FIRE RESISTANCE RATING, OR A MINIMUM CONCRETE COLUMN
 DIMENSION OF 8 INCHES IF TWO PARALLEL SIDES ARE AT
 LEAST 36 INCHES LONG.COLUMN TC-5, SHOWN ON SHEET S-9,
 DOES NOT COMPLY WITH EITHER REQUIREMENT OPTION.REVISE
 THE SIZE OF COLUMN TC-5 TO COMPLY WITH SECTION IS
 709.2.4 OF FBC 2001
  
 13) FBC 13-103.1.2THIS COMMENT HAS STILL NOT BEEN
 ADDRESSED.THE SIGNATURE OF RAFAEL PENA IS STILL A
 PHOTOCOPIED SIGNATURE.AN ORIGINAL (WET) SIGNATURE
 MUST BE PUT ON THESE ENERGY CALCULATIONS BY RAFAEL
 PENA.WE NEED THREE COPIES OF THE ENERGY CODE
 COMPLIANCE FORM, EACH WITH RAFAEL PENA'S ORIGINAL (WET)
 SIGNATURE AND RAISED SEAL.
  
 15) FBC 1606.1WIND LOADS ON PARKING STRUCTURE.THE
 COMMENT RESPONSE, STATING THAT HARDING STEEL IS
 CURRENTLY PRODUCING WIND LOAD CALCULATIONS, IS NOTED.
 THE WIND LOAD DESIGN CRITERIA/CALCULATIONS SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW.PREVIOUS COMMENT (RE-STATED HERE
 FOR INFORMATION):THE SUBMITTAL FOR THE HARDING STEEL,
 INC. PARKING STRUCTURE DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY WIND LOAD
 DESIGN CRITERIA.THE STRUCTURE MUST BE DESIGNED TO
 WITHSTAND A WIND SPEED OF 140 MPH (3 SECOND GUST).
 SUBMIT WIND LOAD DESIGN CRITERIA/CALCULATIONS.ALL
 STRUCTURAL SUBMITTALS MUST BE REVIEWED BY THE
 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER OF RECORD FOR THE PROJECT AND
 INCLUDE THE SHOP DRAWING REVIEW STAMP OF THAT
 ENGINEER.
  
 NOTE: TO EXPEDITE REVIEW OF A RESUBMITTAL WHICH
 REQUIRES NEW PLANS IN ORDER TO ADDRESS THE ABOVE
 COMMENTS, THE OLD SHEETS SHALL BE REMOVED AND THE NEW
 SHEETS INSERTED.ONE COPY OF EACH OLD SHEET SHOULD BE
 STAPLED/CLIPPED TO THE REMAINING OLD SHEETS, TO FORM A
 SET OF 'OLD/VOID SHEETS', FOR COMPARISON OF REVISIONS
 WHEN REVIEWING THE RESUBMITTED PLANS.
  
 **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE**
  
 END OF REVIEW COMMENTS
 THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO TELEPHONE:
 (561) 805 6652ROBERT BROWN
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 6 Status F Date 2008-03-04 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 2008-03-04 Time 19:25 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 2008-03-04 Time 19:25 Sent To  
Notes
2008-03-04 19:40:05BUILDING PLAN REVIEW
 *******DENIED*******
 ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6652
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
 3RD REVIEW OF REVISION FOR INCREASE IN NUMBER OF
 STORIES FROM 5 TO 8 STORIES.
  
 FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001
 FBC*= FLORIDA BUILD'G CODE (CITY AMEND)
 F.S.= FLORIDA (STATE) STATUTE
  
 FOR CONSISTENCY, THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE NUMBERED AS
 PER THE BUILDING PLAN REVIEW OF 9/23/07:
  
 3)IMPACT FEES. THE PROPOSED INCREASE IN BUILDING AREA
 WILL INCREASE THE IMPACT FEES DUE.THE PLANS SHALL BE
 TAKEN TO PALM BEACH COUNTY BUILDING DEPARTMENT FOR
 CALCULATION OF THE ADDITIONAL IMPACT FEES. THEY SHALL
 BE STAMPED AT THAT OFFICE AND A COPY OF THE PAID
 RECEIPT SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH DEPT
 OF CONSTRUCTION SERVICES BEFORE THE REVISED PLANS CAN
 BE STAMPED.
  
 4) FBC TABLE 500ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT.FBC
 503.2.6 STATES THAT THE HEIGHT OF RESIDENTIAL
 OCCUPANCY, IN BUILDINGS OF TYPE II CONSTRUCTION, CAN BE
 UNLIMITED PROVIDED THE FIRE RESISTANCE OF ALL COLUMNS
 IS NOT LESS THAN 3 HOURS.YOUR COMMENT RESPONSE LETTER
 HAS BEEN NOTED.STEEL COLUMNS: SHEET A-506 HAS BEEN
 REVISED TO SHOW THE UL SYSTEM FOR FIRE RESISTANCE
 RATING OF THE STEEL COLUMNS, BUT THE APPLICATION
 THICKNESS TABLE REPRODUCED ON THE PLANS IS NOT LEGIBLE.
 SHOW A LEGIBLE TABLE ON THE PLANS.ALSO, THE TABLE
 COVERS MANY DIFFERENT FIRE RESISTANCE RATINGS, SOME OF
 WHICH ARE LESS THAN 3 HOURS.THE PLANS SHALL CLEARLY
 STATE, FOR THE CONTRACTOR AND INSPECTOR, THAT A 3 HOUR
 FIRE RESISTANCE RATING IS REQUIRED FOR THE COLUMNS ON
 THIS PROJECT.CONCRETE COLUMNS: THE COMMENT RESPONSE
 LETTER STATES THAT THE COLUMN FIRE RESISTANCE RATING
 HAS BEEN PROVIDED PER SECTION 709.2.1.1.1 OF FBC 2001.
 THAT SECTION IS ACTUALLY FOR WALLS.THE APPLICABLE
 SECTION FOR COLUMNS IS 709.2.4 OF FBC 2001 WHICH
 REQUIRES A MINIMUM CONCRETE COLUMN DIMENSION OF 12
 INCHES FOR A 3 HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE RATING, OR A
 MINIMUM CONCRETE COLUMN DIMENSION OF 8 INCHES IF TWO
 PARALLEL SIDES ARE AT LEAST 36 INCHES LONG.COLUMN
 TC-5, SHOWN ON SHEET S-9, DOES NOT COMPLY WITH EITHER
 REQUIREMENT OPTION.REVISE THE SIZE OF COLUMN TC-5 TO
 COMPLY WITH SECTION IS 709.2.4 OF FBC 2001
  
 13) FBC 13-103.1.2THIS COMMENT HAS STILL NOT BEEN
 ADDRESSED.THE SUBMITTED REVISED ENERGY CODE
 COMPLIANCE FORM SHALL BE SIGNED (ON PAGE 2) BY THE
 BUILDING OWNER, THE OWNER'S ARCHITECT OR OTHER
 AUTHORIZED AGENT LEGALLY DESIGNATED BY THE OWNER. ALSO,
 THREE SIGNED AND SEALED COPIES OF THE ENERGY CODE
 COMPLIANCE FORM ARE REQUIRED BUT ALL THREE SUBMITTED
 COPIES HAVE A PHOTOCOPY OF RAFAEL PENA'S SIGNATURE, AND
 TWO ARE NOT SEALED.THE SIGNATURE MUST BE ORIGINAL AND
 THE SEAL MUST BE AFFIXED.
  
 15) FBC 1606.1WIND LOADS ON PARKING STRUCTURE.THE
 SUBMITTAL FOR THE HARDING STEEL, INC. PARKING STRUCTURE
 DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY WIND LOAD DESIGN CRITERIA.THE
 STRUCTURE MUST BE DESIGNED TO WITHSTAND A WIND SPEED OF
 140 MPH (3 SECOND GUST).SUBMIT WIND LOAD DESIGN
 CRITERIA/CALCULATIONS.ALL STRUCTURAL SUBMITTALS MUST
 BE REVIEWED BY THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER OF RECORD FOR
 THE PROJECT AND INCLUDE THE SHOP DRAWING REVIEW STAMP
 OF THAT ENGINEER.
  
 **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE**
  
 END OF REVIEW COMMENTS
 THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO TELEPHONE:
 (561) 805 6652ROBERT BROWN
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 5 Status F Date 2007-09-23 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 2007-09-23 Time 18:35 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 2007-09-23 Time 18:35 Sent To  
Notes
2007-09-23 19:46:24BUILDING PLAN REVIEW
 *******DENIED*******
 ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6652
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
 2ND REVIEW OF REVISION FOR INCREASE IN NUMBER OF
 STORIES FROM 5 TO 8 STORIES.
  
 FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001
 FBC*= FLORIDA BUILD'G CODE (CITY AMEND)
 F.S.= FLORIDA (STATE) STATUTE
  
 FOR CONSISTENCY, THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE NUMBERED AS
 PER THE BUILDING PLAN REVIEW OF 12/10/06:
  
 1) FBC* 104.6.5BUILDING PERMIT VALUATION.THE
 PROPOSED INCREASE IN BUILDING AREA WILL INCREASE THE
 VALUE OF THE PROJECT FOR PERMIT FEE CALCULATION
 PURPOSES.THE VALUE CURRENTLY STATED IS $5,362,279 AND
 THE FEES PAID TO DATE WERE BASED ON THAT VALUE.THE
 VALUE, CALCULATED USING THE SOUTHERN BUILDING CODE
 CONGRESS INTERNATIONAL (SBCCI) VALUATION TABLES FOR THE
 PROPOSED INCREASED BUILDING AREA, IS $8,268,362.IN
 ORDER TO PROCEED WITH THE PROPOSED REVISION, THE PERMIT
 APPLICATION FEE WOULD HAVE TO BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY,
 SO THERE WOULD BE AN OUTSTANDING BALANCE OF $32,257.53.
 THIS ADDITIONAL FEE AMOUNT WILL HAVE TO BE PAID BEFORE
 THE PLANS REVISED PLANS CAN BE STAMPED.
  
 2) RADON FEES.THE PROPOSED INCREASE IN BUILDING AREA
 WILL INCREASE THE RADON FEES.THE RADON FEES PAID TO
 DATE AMOUNT TO $532.96.THE TOTAL RADON FEES FOR THE
 PROPOSED BUILDING AREA WOULD BE $799.72.THE
 DIFFERENCE IS $266.76 AND THIS AMOUNT WOULD HAVE TO BE
 PAIDBEFORE THE REVISED PLANS CAN BE STAMPED.
  
 3)IMPACT FEES. THE PROPOSED INCREASE IN BUILDING AREA
 WILL INCREASE THE IMPACT FEES DUE.THE PLANS SHALL BE
 TAKEN TO PALM BEACH COUNTY BUILDING DEPARTMENT FOR
 CALCULATION OF THE ADDITIONAL IMPACT FEES. THEY SHALL
 BE STAMPED AT THAT OFFICE AND A COPY OF THE PAID
 RECEIPT SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH DEPT
 OF CONSTRUCTION SERVICES BEFORE THE REVISED PLANS CAN
 BE STAMPED.
  
 4) FBC TABLE 500ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT.CONTRARY
 TO THE SUBMITTED RESPONSE LETTER, THE ARCHITECTURAL
 PLANS DO NOT SHOW THAT THE COLUMNS WILL HAVE 3-HOUR
 FIRE RESISTANCE RATING.THERE IS NO NOTE IN THE
 ARCHOTECTURAL OR STRUCTURAL PLANS STATING THAT THE
 COLUMN FIRE RESISTANCE RATING IS 3-HOURS.NO "VOIDED"
 (PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED) STRUCTURAL SHEETS, AND NOT ALL
 "VOIDED" ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS, WERE SUBMITTED FOR
 COMPARISON WITH THE PROPOSED PLANS, AND SHEETS S-1 AND
 S-2 DO NOT INDICATE ANY CHANGE TO THE COLUMN SIZES.
 3-HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE RATED COLUMNS ARE REQUIRED
 THROUGHOUT THE BUILDING BECUSE FOR RESIDENTIAL
 OCCUPANCY (INCLUDING R-1 HOTEL) THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF A
 BUILDING OF TYPE II CONSTRUCTION IS 80 FEET UNLESS
 FOOTNOTE (A) ALLOWS HEIGHT MODIFICATION. FOOTNOTE
 (A)(7) REFERS TO FBC 503.2.6 FOR RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCY.
 FBC 503.2.6 STATES THAT THE HEIGHT OF RESIDENTIAL
 OCCUPANCY, IN BUILDINGS OF TYPE II CONSTRUCTION, CAN BE
 UNLIMITED PROVIDED THE FIRE RESISTANCE OF ALL COLUMNS
 IS NOT LESS THAN 3 HOURS. THE PROPOSED HEIGHT OF THE
 BUILDING DOES EXCEED 80 FEET, SO THE PLANS MUST BE
 AMENDED TO SHOW ALL COLUMNS TO HAVE A FIRE RESISTANCE
 RATING OF NOT LESS THAN THREE HOURS.
  
 6) FBC 412.6.1ELEVATOR LOBBY DOORS ARE REQUIRED TO
 HAVE A 20-MINUTE FIRE-RESISTANCE RATING.THE NOTE
 ADDED TO SHEET A-125 DOES SHOW A REQUIREMENT FOR A
 20-MINUTE FIRE RESISTANCE RATED DOOR AT THE ELEVATOR
 LOBBY/CORRIDOR BUT IT HAS NO ANNOTATION AT THE ELEVATOR
 LOBBY/VESTIBULE.ALSO, THE DOOR SCHEDULE HAS NOT BEEN
 UPDATED TO CORRELATE WITH THIS REQUIREMENT.DOORS
 299D, 299E, 399C, 399E, 499C, 499E, 599C, 599E, 699C,
 699E, 799C, 799E, 899C AND 899E ARE ALL REQUIRED TO BE
 20-MINUTE DOORS.THE DOOR SCHEDULE ON SHEET A-604 DOES
 NOT SHOW THESE DOORS AS FIRE RESISTANCE RATED.AMEND
 THE DOOR SCHEDULE TO CLEARLY SHOW THE REQUIRED FIRE
 RESISTANCE RATINGS FOR THESE DOORS.20-MINUTE FIRE
 RESISTANCE RATED DOORS ARE REQUIRED BECAUSE THE
 BUILDING AS REVISED WILL BE CLASSIFIED AS 'HIGH RISE'
 BECAUSE IT WILL HAVE OCCUPIED FLOORS MORE THAN 75 FEET
 ABOVE FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS LEVEL.1-HOUR FIRE
 RESISTANT ELEVATOR LOBBIES, WITH 20-MINUTE LOBBY DOORS,
 ARE REQUIRED ON ALL FLOORS ABOVE THE MAIN ENTRANCE
 LEVEL.
  
 11) FBC 11-4.1.3(5)ELEVATOR ACCESS TO ROOF UPPER
 DECK.IT IS NOTED THAT SHEET A-111 HAS BEEN REVISED TO
 SHOW AN ACCESSIBLE RAMP FROM THE UPPER DECK TO THE
 LOWER DECK.HOWEVER, NO DETAILS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED TO
 SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH RAMP SLOPE, LANDING AND HANDRAIL
 REQUIREMENTS.
  
 13) FBC 13-103.1.2THIS COMMENT HAS NOT BEEN
 ADDRESSED.THE SUBMITTED REVISED ENERGY CODE
 COMPLIANCE FORM SHALL BE SIGNED (ON PAGE 2) BY THE
 BUILDING OWNER, THE OWNER'S ARCHITECT OR OTHER
 AUTHORIZED AGENT LEGALLY DESIGNATED BY THE OWNER. ALSO,
 THREE SIGNED COPIES OF THE ENERGY CODE COMPLIANCE FORM
 ARE REQUIRED.
  
 14) FBC* 104.2.1CROSS-SECTIONS A-302/B-B AND
 A-304/D-D HAVE NOT BEEN UPDATED TO REFLECT THE FACT THE
 THAT ELEVATOR STOPS AT THE UPPER DECK LEVEL AND THAT
 THERE IS NOW AN ACCESSIBLE RAMP FROM THE UPPER DECK TO
 THE LOWER DECK.
  
  
 **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE**
  
 END OF REVIEW COMMENTS
 THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO TELEPHONE:
 (561) 805 6652ROBERT BROWN
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2006-12-11 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 2006-12-10 Time 19:54 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 2006-12-10 Time 19:54 Sent To  
Notes
2006-12-10 20:39:02BUILDING PLAN REVIEW
 *******DENIED*******
 ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6652
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
 REVISION TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF STORIES FROM 5 TO 8
 STORIES.
  
 FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001
 FBC*= FLORIDA BUILD'G CODE (CITY AMEND)
 F.S.= FLORIDA (STATE) STATUTE
  
 1) FBC* 104.6.5BUILDING PERMIT VALUATION.THE
 PROPOSED INCREASE IN BUILDING AREA WILL INCREASE THE
 VALUE OF THE PROJECT FOR PERMIT FEE CALCULATION
 PURPOSES.THE VALUE CURRENTLY STATED IS $5,362,279 AND
 THE FEES PAID TO DATE WERE BASED ON THAT VALUE.THE
 VALUE, CALCULATED USING THE SOUTHERN BUILDING CODE
 CONGRESS INTERNATIONAL (SBCCI) VALUATION TABLES FOR THE
 PROPOSED INCREASED BUILDING AREA, IS $8,268,362.IN
 ORDER TO PROCEED WITH THE PROPOSED REVISION, THE PERMIT
 APPLICATION FEE WOULD HAVE TO BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY,
 SO THERE WOULD BE AN OUTSTANDING BALANCE OF $32,257.53.
 THIS ADDITIONAL FEE AMOUNT WILL HAVE TO BE PAID BEFORE
 THE PLANS REVISED PLANS CAN BE STAMPED.
  
 2) RADON FEES.THE PROPOSED INCREASE IN BUILDING AREA
 WILL INCREASE THE RADON FEES.THE RADON FEES PAID TO
 DATE AMOUNT TO $532.96.THE TOTAL RADON FEES FOR THE
 PROPOSED BUILDING AREA WOULD BE $799.72.THE
 DIFFERENCE IS $266.76 AND THIS AMOUNT WOULD HAVE TO BE
 PAIDBEFORE THE REVISED PLANS CAN BE STAMPED.
  
 3)IMPACT FEES. THE PROPOSED INCREASE IN BUILDING AREA
 WILL INCREASE THE IMPACT FEES DUE.THE PLANS SHALL BE
 TAKEN TO PALM BEACH COUNTY BUILDING DEPARTMENT FOR
 CALCULATION OF THE ADDITIONAL IMPACT FEES. THEY SHALL
 BE STAMPED AT THAT OFFICE AND A COPY OF THE PAID
 RECEIPT SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH DEPT
 OF CONSTRUCTION SERVICES BEFORE THE REVISED PLANS CAN
 BE STAMPED.
  
 4) FBC TABLE 500ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT.FOR
 RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCY (INCLUDING R-1 HOTEL) THE MAXIMUM
 HEIGHT OF A BUILDING OF TYPE II CONSTRUCTION IS 80 FEET
 UNLESS FOOTNOTE (A) ALLOWS HEIGHT MODIFICATION.
 FOOTNOTE (A)(7) REFERS TO FBC 503.2.6 FOR RESIDENTIAL
 OCCUPANCY.FBC 503.2.6 STATES THAT THE HEIGHT OF
 RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCY, IN BUILDINGS OF TYPE II
 CONSTRUCTION, CAN BE UNLIMITED PROVIDED THE FIRE
 RESISTANCE OF ALL COLUMNS IS NOT LESS THAN 3 HOURS. THE
 PROPOSED HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING DOES EXCEED 80 FEET, SO
 THE PLANS MUST BE AMENDED TO SHOW ALL COLUMNS TO HAVE A
 FIRE RESISTANCE RATING OF NOT LESS THAN THREE HOURS.
  
 5) FBC 412.6ELEVATOR LOBBIES.THE BUILDING AS
 REVISED WILL BE CLASSIFIED AS 'HIGH RISE' BECAUSE IT
 WILL HAVE OCCUPIED FLOORS MORE THAN 75 FEET ABOVE FIRE
 DEPARTMENT ACCESS LEVEL.1-HOUR FIRE RESISTANT
 ELEVATOR LOBBIES, WITH 20-MINUTE LOBBY DOORS, ARE
 REQUIRED ON ALL FLOORS ABOVE THE MAIN ENTRANCE LEVEL.
 ANNOTATE THE PLANS TO CLARIFY THE PURPOSE OF THE
 ROOM/LOBBYIMMEDIATELY SOUTH OF THE ELEVATOR LOBBY
  
 6) FBC 412.6.1ELEVATOR LOBBY DOORS ARE REQUIRED TO
 HAVE A 20-MINUTE FIRE-RESISTANCE RATING.DOORS 299D,
 299E, 399C, 399E, 499C, 499E, 599C, 599E, 699C, 699E,
 799C, 799E, 899C AND 899E ARE ALL REQUIRED TO BE
 20-MINUTE DOORS.THE DOOR SCHEDULE ON SHEET A-604 DOES
 NOT SHOW THESE DOORS AS FIRE RESISTANCE RATED.ALSO,
 IS 299D THE CORRECT DOOR REFERENCE, OR SHOULD IT BE
 299C TO MATCH WHAT IS CALLED OUT ON THE OTHER FLOORS?
 AMEND THE DOOR SCHEDULE TO CLEARLY SHOW THE REQUIRED
 FIRE RESISTANCE RATINGS FOR THESE DOORS.
  
 7) FBC 412.6.1 ELEVATOR LOBBY WALLS.SHEET A-125,
 TYPICAL LIFE SAFETY PLAN, DOES NOT SHOW THE REQUIRED
 1-HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE RATING FOR THE NORTH AND SOUTH
 WALLS OF THE ELEVATOR LOBBISE.AMEND THE PLAN.
  
 8) FBC 412.6.2OPENINGS IN THE ELEVATOR LOBBY.NO
 SERVICE ROOMS, CLOSETS ETC. SHALL OPEN INTO THE
 ELEVATOR LOBBY.ANNOTATE THE PLANS TO CLARIFY THE
 PURPOSE OF THE ROOM/LOBBYIMMEDIATELY SOUTH OF THE
 ELEVATOR LOBBY
  
 9) FBC 412.6.3ELEVATOR LOBBY SMOKE DETECTION.SHEETS
 FA-3, TYPICAL FIRE ALARM FLOOR PLAN, SHOWS NO SMOKE
 DETECTOR IN THE ELEVATOR LOBBIES.AN APPROVED SMOKE
 DETECTOR SHALL BE LOCATED ON THE CEILING OF EVERY
 ELEVATOR LOBBY.AMEND THE PLAN TO CLEARLY SHOW THE
 NECESSARY ELEVATOR LOBBY SMOKE DETECTION.
  
 10) FBC 11-9.1.2ACCESSIBLE SLEEPING ROOMS.SHEET
 A-102 HAS BEEN REVISED TO OMIT THE ACCESSIBLE SLEEPING
 ACCOMMODATION FROM SUITE 105 SO THAT FACILITY MUST BE
 PROVIDED ELSEWHERE IN THE BUILDING.IT IS NOTED THAT
 SHEET A-104 NOW CALLS OUT SUITE 200 AS "SLEEPING
 ACCOMMODATIONS WITH SPECIAL ACCESSIBILITY FEATURE
 (ROLL-IN SHOWER", BUT NO ROLL-IN SHOWER IS SHOWN. AMEND
 THE PLAN.
  
 11) FBC 11-4.1.3(5)ELEVATOR ACCESS TO ROOF UPPER
 DECK.SHEET A-111 HAS BEEN REVISED TO SHOW ACCESS BY
 WHEELCHAIR LIFT.ACCESS TO ALL LEVELS, INCLUDING THE
 ROOF UPPER DECK,SHALL BE BY PASSENGER ELEVATOR, OR AN
 ACCESSIBLE RAMP MUST BE PROVIDED.WHEECHAIR LIFTS ARE
 ONLY PERMITTED WHEN ONE OF THE CONDITIONS OF EXCEPTION
 4 APPLIES.AS NONE OF THOSE CONDITIONS APPLY HERE, THE
 PLANS SHALL BE AMENDED TO SHOW ACCESS TO THE ROOF UPPER
 DECK BY BOTH ELEVATORS OR BY ACCESSIBLE RAMP.
  
 12) FBC 11-4.1.2(5) AND 11-4.6.5SHEET A-101, REVISED
 PARKING TABLE, AND SHEET A-204.ANNOTATE THE PLAN TO
 CLARFIY HOW THE PROPOSED PARKING STRUCTURE WILL BE
 USED.IS THE PARKING STRUCTURE FOR USE BY VALET ONLY?
 IF SO, THEN AN ACCESSIBLE PASSENGER LOADING ZONE
 COMPLYING WITH FBC 11-4.6.6 LOCATED ON AN ACCESSIBLE
 ROUTE TO THE BUILDING ENTRANCE IS REQUIRED.IF THE
 PARKING STRUCTURE IS NOT FOR USE BY VALET ONLY, AND IT
 IS A COVERED PARKING FACILITY UNDER A ROOF, PLEASE NOTE
 THAT 5 OF THE PROPOSED 134 PARKING SPACES ARE SHOWN AS
 UNCOVERED.ALL 5 ARE ACCESSIBLE SPACES, SO NO COVERED
 ACCESSIBLE PARKING IS BEING PROVIDED.EITHER A
 PRORATED NUMBER OF THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL
 BE COVERED PARKING FOR HANDICAPPED PERSONS, OR VALET
 PARKING WITH THE AFOREMENTIONED ACCESSIBLE PASSENGER
 LOADING ZONE, IS REQUIRED.ALSO PLEASE CONSIDER THAT,
 FOR SELF-PARKING, ONE IN EIGHT (NOT LESS THAN ONE) OF
 THE SPACES IN THE PARKING STRUCTURE SHALL BE VAN
 ACCESSIBLE COMPLYING WITH FBC 11-4.6.5.ANNOTATE THE
 PLANS TO CLARFIY WHETHER VALET PARKING WILL BE PROVIDED
 AND HOW THE PROPOSED PARKING STRUCTURE WILL BE USED.
  
 13) FBC 13-103.1.2THE SUBMITTED REVISED ENERGY CODE
 COMPLIANCE FORM SHALL BE SIGNED (ON PAGE 2) BY THE
 BUILDING OWNER, THE OWNER'S ARCHITECT OR OTHER
 AUTHORIZED AGENT LEGALLY DESIGNATED BY THE OWNER.
 ALSO, THREE SIGNED COPIES OF THE ENERGY CODE COMPLIANCE
 FORM ARE REQUIRED.
  
  
 **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE**
  
 END OF REVIEW COMMENTS
 THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO TELEPHONE:
 (561) 805 6652ROBERT BROWN
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2006-08-20 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 2006-08-20 Time 12:50 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 2006-08-20 Time 12:50 Sent To Z
Notes
2006-08-20 00:00:00BUILDING PLAN REVIEW
 *******DENIED*******
 ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6652
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
 FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001
 FBC*= FLORIDA BUILD'G CODE (CITY AMEND)
 F.S.= FLORIDA (STATE) STATUTE
  
 SITE PLAN (SHEET A-101) AND FOUNDATION
 PLAN (SHEET S-1) AND DETAIL SHEET (SHEET
 S-2) REVISION FOR ADDITION OF THREE
 STORIES (6TH, 7TH AND 8TH FLOORS) TO THE
 BUILDING.
  
 1) FBC* 104.6THE DECLARED BUILDING
 VALUE SHALL BE INCREASED TO ACCOUNT FOR
 THE THREE ADDITIONAL STORIES AND THE
 STRENGTHENING OF THE
 STRUCTURE/FOUNDATION TO SUPPORT THEM.
 THE PERMIT FEES WILL THEN BE ADJUSTED
 ACCORDINGLY.
  
 2) IMPACT FEES AND RADON FEES.PLEASE
 NOTE THAT ADDITIONAL IMPACT FEES AND
 RADON FEES WILL BE DUE FOR THE INCREASE
 IN BUILDING AREA.
  
 3) FBC 11-4.1.2(5) AND 11-4.6.5SHEET
 A-101, REVISED PARKING TABLE.ANNOTATE
 THE PLAN TO CLARFIY HOW THE PROPOSED
 PARKING STRUCTURE WILL BE USED.IS THE
 PARKING STRUCTURE FOR USE BY VALET ONLY?
 IF SO, THEN AN ACCESSIBLE PASSENGER
 LOADING ZONE COMPLYING WITH FBC 11-4.6.6
 LOCATED ON AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO THE
 BUILDING ENTRANCE IS REQUIRED.
 IF THE PARKING STRUCTURE IS NOT FOR USE
 BY VALET ONLY, PLEASE NOTE THAT EIGHT OF
 THE PROPOSED 146 PARKING SPACES ARE
 SHOWN AS UNCOVERED.SO IT IS ASSUMED
 THAT THE PARKING STRUCTURE WILL PROVIDE
 THE REMAINING SPACES AS COVERED PARKING.
 IN THAT CASE, A PORTION OF THE
 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL BE IN
 THE PARKING STRUCTURE TO PROVIDE COVERED
 PARKING FOR HANDICAPPED PERSONS.ALSO,
 ONE IN EIGHT (NOT LESS THAN ONE) OF THE
 SPACES IN THE PARKING STRUCTURE SHALL BE
 VAN ACCESSIBLE COMPLYING WITH FBC
 11-4.6.5. ANNOTATE THE PLAN TO CLARFIY
 HOW THE PROPOSED PARKING STRUCTURE WILL
 BE USED.
  
 4)FOUNDATION TYPE.THE PLANS
 PREVIOUSLY SHOWED CONCRETE FOOTINGS FOR
 COLUMNS AND WALLS AND A 4" CONCRETE
 FIRST FLOOR SLAB.THE REVISED SHEET S-1
 NOW INCLUDES A NOTE CALLING OUT A 30"
 THICK CONCRETE MAT FOUNDATION BUT IT
 ALSO STILL SHOWS A NOTE CALLING OUT A 4"
 CONCRETE SLAB. WHAT IS THE FOUNDATION
 FOR COLUMNS TC-3, TC-6, TC-7 ETC AND FOR
 THE SPIRAL STAIRS.ANNOTATE THE PLAN
 AND PROVIDE CROSS SECTION DETAILS TO
 CLARIFY THE EXTENT OF THE MAT FOUNDATION
 AND THEPROPOSED FOUNDATION AND SLAB
 ARRANGEMENT.
  
 5) FBC* 104.2.1SHEET S-2 WAS
 PREVIOUSLY THE MEZZANINE FRAMING PLAN.
 THE DETAILS SHOWN ON THE REVISED SHEET
 S-2 WERE PREVIOUSLY SHOWN ON SHEET S-9.
 IS THAT INTENTIONAL?PLEASE NOTE THAT
 THE NEW VERSION OF S-2 (STRUCTURAL
 DETAILS) WILL REPLACE THE PREVIOUS S-2
 (MEZZANINE FRAMING PLAN) SUCH THAT THERE
 IS NO LONGER A MEZZANINE FRAMING PLAN.
 PLEASE CORRECT OR CLARIFY.
  
 6) FBC* 104.2.1SHEETS S-1 AND S-2.
 WHEN SUBMITTING REVISED PLANS, PLEASE
 USE REVISION MARKERS (AND 'CLOUDS') TO
 CLEARLY SHOW WHAT AREAS HAVE BEEN
 REVISED.
  
 **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE**
  
 END OF REVIEW COMMENTS
 THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO
 TELEPHONE: (561) 805 6652ROBERT BROWN
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2005-08-31 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 2005-08-31 Time 13:24 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 2005-08-18 Time 13:24 Sent To  
Notes
2005-08-18 00:00:00**** NEEDS NOC AND IMPACT FEE ****
 BEFORE PERMIT ISSUANCE
  
 713.13 F.S.A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT
 SHALL BE RECORDED AT PALM BEACH COUNTY
 COURTHOUSE AND A COPY SUBMITTED TO THIS
 OFFICE BEFORE A PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED.
 BLANK FORMS ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS
 OFFICE.
 NOTE: THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE
 RE-RECORDED IF THE DESCRIBED IMPROVEMENT
 OR CONSTRUCTION IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN
 90 DAYS OF RECORDING.
  
 IMPACT FEES. THE ARCHITECT'S RESPONSE
 MEMO, DATED 7/7/05, STATES THAT THE
 IMPACT FEE STAMP IS ALREADY ON SHEET
 A-101 AND A-102.THAT IS NOT CORRECT.
 THE PLANS SHALL BE TAKEN TO PALM BEACH
 COUNTY BUILDING DEPARTMENT FOR IMPACT
 FEE ASSESSMENT. THEY SHALL BE STAMPED AT
 THAT OFFICE AND A COPY OF THE PAID
 RECEIPT SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF
 WEST PALM BEACH DEPT OF CONSTRUCTION
 SERVICES BEFORE A PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED.
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2005-06-02 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 2005-06-02 Time 14:46 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 2005-05-31 Time 14:55 Sent To  
Notes
2005-05-31 00:00:00BUILDING PLAN REVIEW
 *******DENIED*******
 ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6716
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
 FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001
 FBC*= FLORIDA BUILD'G CODE (CITY AMEND)
 F.S.= FLORIDA (STATE) STATUTE
  
  
 1) 713.13 F.S.A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT
 SHALL BE RECORDED AT PALM BEACH COUNTY
 COURTHOUSE AND A COPY SUBMITTED TO THIS
 OFFICE BEFORE A PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED.
 BLANK FORMS ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS
 OFFICE.
 NOTE: THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE
 RE-RECORDED IF THE DESCRIBED IMPROVEMENT
 OR CONSTRUCTION IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN
 90 DAYS OF RECORDING.
  
 2) IMPACT FEES. THE PLANS SHALL BE TAKEN
 TO PALM BEACH COUNTY BUILDING DEPARTMENT
 FOR IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT. THEY SHALL BE
 STAMPED AT THAT OFFICE AND A COPY OF THE
 PAID RECEIPT SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF
 WEST PALM BEACH DEPT OF CONSTRUCTION
 SERVICES BEFORE A PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED.
  
 3) FBC* 105.13.1SPECIAL INSPECTOR
 AGREEMENT.THE SUBMITTED AGREEMENT
 LISTS THE WEITZ COMPANY AS CONTRACTOR
 (SHOULD BE J RAYMOND CONSTRUCTION CORP),
 HAS NO ORIGINAL SIGNATURES OR RAISED
 SEALS AND REFERS TO THE OLD PERMIT#
 03121642.SUBMIT THREE (3) COPIES OF A
 NEW SPECIAL INSPECTOR AGREEMENT.THE
 AGREEMENT SHALL INCLUDE THE NEW PERMIT
 NUMBER (05031185) AND SHALL BE SIGNED BY
 AN AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY FOR J. RAYMOND
 CONSTRUCTION CORP.ORIGINAL SIGNATURES
 ARE REQUIRED (WITH RAISED SEALS FOR
 ENGINEERS/ARCHITECTS)
  
 4) FBC 13-103.1.2BEFORE A BUILDING
 PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED, THE SUBMITTED
 ENERGY CODE COMPLIANCE FORMS SHALL BE
 SIGNED BY THE BUILDING OWNER, THE
 OWNER'S ARCHITECT OR OTHER AUTHORIZED
 AGENT LEGALLY DESIGNATED BY THE OWNER.
 ALSO, THE SIGNATURE OF RAFAEL PENA IS A
 COPY.AN ORIGINAL SIGNATURE IS
 REQUIRED.
  
 5) FBC 2803PACKAGED TERMINAL AIR
 CONDITIONER (PTAC), SECTIONS A-401/1 TO
 A-402/4 AND S-11/1 TO S-11/3.SUBMIT
 DETAILS TO SHOW HOW THE PTAC AND
 ALUMINUM LOUVER WILL PREVENT WIND-DRIVEN
 RAIN FROM ENTERING THE BUILDING.
  
 6) FBC* 2111.1.9WATER STOP, DETAIL
 A-503/4 AND SECTIONS A-301 TO A-402 AND
 S-11/1 TO S-11/2.THE REQUIRED 1.5"
 SLAB RECESS IS NOT SHOWN.AMEND THE
 PLANS OR MAKE A PROPOSAL, FOR
 CONSIDERATION UNDER FBC* 103.7 ALTERNATE
 MATERIALS AND METHODS, FOR
 WATER-PROOFING THE 'COLD JOINT' BETWEEN
 WALL AND SLAB.
  
 7) FBC 707.1 CONCEALED SPACES IN TYPE II
 CONSTRUCTION.SHEETS A-503 AND A-502
 DETAIL 11, SHOW WOOD BLOCKING.ALL
 BUCKS, HEADERS, BLOCKING AND FIRRING
 STRIPS ETC SHALL BE FIRE RETARDANT
 TREATED LUMBER IN TYPE I, II AND IV
 CONSTRUCTION.AMEND/ANNOTATE THE PLANS.
  
 8) FBC 1606.1TRUSS ANCHOR SCHEDULE,
 SHEET S-9 AND SHEET S-11 SECTION 2.A
 COMBINED CAPACITY FOR TWO (2) SIMPSON
 META 22 OF 2900# IS STATED ON THE
 SCHEDULE.THIS EXCEEDS THE MAX. (TWO
 ANCHOR) COMBINED UPLIFT OF 2565# ALLOWED
 IN THE 2005 SIMPSON CATALOGUE.AMEND
 THE SCHEDULE.
  
 9) THE SUBMITTED GAF BUILT-UP ROOFING
 PRODUCT APPROVAL (STATEWIDE# FL618 AND
 MIAMI-DADE NOA# 00-0403.02) COVERS
 SYSTEMS WITH DESIGN PRESSURE RATINGS
 THAT RANGE FROM -45 PSF TO 457.5 PSF, SO
 SOME OF THE SYSTEMS ARE NOT SUITABLE FOR
 THIS PROJECT.MARK THE NOA TO SHOW
 WHICH SYSTEM IS PROPOSED SO THAT THAT
 THE DESIGN PRESSURE CAN BE COMPARED WITH
 THE CALCULATED PRESSURES FOR THE
 BUILDING.
  
 10) FBC 1606.1.4IMPACT RATING OF
 SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS.THE SUBMITTED PGT
 SINGLE HUNG WINDOW STATEWIDE PRODUCT
 APPROVAL FL239 COVERS NON-IMPACT, SMALL
 MISSILE IMPACT AND LARGE MISSILE IMPACT.
 THE MIAMI-DADE PRODUCT APPROVAL (NOA#
 02-0123.04) THAT WAS SUBMITTED, IS FOR
 SMALL MISSILE IMPACT RATED WINDOWS, SO
 IT IS NOT APPLICABLE FOR THE WINDOWS
 BELOW 30 FEET ABOVE GRADE.SUBMIT THREE
 COPIES OF A PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR LARGE
 MISSILE IMPACT RATED WINDOWS.
  
 11) TO EXPEDITE REVIEW OF A RESUBMITTAL
 WHICH REQUIRES NEW PLANS IN ORDER TO
 ADDRESS THE ABOVE COMMENTS, THE OLD
 SHEETS SHALL BE REMOVED AND THE NEW
 SHEETS INSERTED.ONE COPY OF EACH OLD
 SHEET SHOULD BE STAPLED/CLIPPED TO THE
 REMAINING OLD SHEETS, TO FORM A SET OF
 'OLD/VOID SHEETS', FOR COMPARISON OF
 REVISIONS WHEN REVIEWING THE RESUBMITTED
 PLANS.
  
 **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE**
  
 END OF REVIEW COMMENTS
 THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO
 TELEPHONE: (561) 805 6716ROBERT BROWN
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 7 Status P Date 2008-07-02 Cont ID  
Sent By dpalmer Date 2008-07-02 Time 10:21 Rev Time 0.00
Received By dpalmer Date 2008-07-01 Time 17:03 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 6 Status F Date 2008-04-23 Cont ID  
Sent By dpalmer Date 2008-04-23 Time 11:53 Rev Time 0.00
Received By dpalmer Date 2008-04-23 Time 11:53 Sent To  
Notes
2008-04-23 11:53:51** DENIED 4TH TIME FOR REVISIONS **
  
 ** PLEASE SEE SOME OF THE NOTES FROM THE PREVIOUS
 REVIEW ARE STILL IN NEED OF ADDRESSING.
 ** PLEASE ALSO SEE NEW COMMENTS BASED ON DOCUMENTS
 FINALLY SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW WHICH WERE NOT SUBMITTED
 PREVIOUSLY.
 ** PLEASE ALSO SEE NEW COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO SIGNED
 AND SEALED DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED WITHOUT ORIGINAL
 SIGNATURES.
  
 1) NOTE: PLEASE SE PREVIOUS REVIEW WITH RESPECT TO
 PHOTO-METRICS AND COORDINATION OF FIXTURES. PLEASE SEE
 SOME EXAMPLES GIVEN ONCE AGAIN AS THERE ARE FIXTURES ON
 PLANS WHICH ARE NOT ON THE PHOTO-METRICS OR FIXTURES ON
 PHOTO-METRICS WHICH ARE NOT THE SAME AS THE LIGHTING
 PLANS. SOME EXAMPLES ARE GIVEN BELOW.
 FOR EXAMPLE:
 PLEASE SEE SHEET E-1 WHICH SHOWS FE FIXTURES ON PLANS
 AND PHOTO-METRICS YET THE FIXTURE SCHEDULE ON THAT SAME
 SHEET STATES FIXTURES F1E.
 FOR EXAMPLE:
 PLEASE SEE SHEET E-4 WHICH SHOWS COMPLETELY DIFFERENT
 LIGHT FIXTURES AND DIFFERENT LIGHT FIXTURE LOCATIONS
 THAN THE LIGHTING SHOWN ON THE PHOTO-METRIC SHEET E-4A
 FOR THIS SAME ROOF-TOP PLAN.
 PLEASE SEE THE FIXTURE TYPES ON E-4A ARE NOT THE SAME
 AND MUCH COORDINATION IS NEEDED.
 PLEASE SEE LS 101 7.8, 7.9
 FBC 106.1.23 FOR COORDINATION AND ADDITIONAL
 INFORMATION.
  
 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THERE ARE SIX SETS OF ENERGY
 CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED. (3-OLD SETS AND 3-NEWS SETS)
 PLEASE SEE IN EITHER CASE NONE OF THESE CONTAIN
 ORIGINAL SIGNATURES BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. IN FACT
 FOUR OF THE 6 SUBMITTED CONTAIN A RAISED SEAL OVER
 PHOTO-COPIED SIGNATURES WHICH ARE IN VIOLATION OF
 FLORIDA STATUTES 471.025 AND FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE
 CODE 61G15-23.002. PLEASE KNOW THESE MAY BE RETAINED BY
 THIS OFFICE AND FORWARDED TO THE FLORIDA BOARD OF
 ENGINEERS AND LEGAL COUNSEL TO THE BOARD. *SHALL NOT
 PLACE A RAISED SEAL OVER PHOTO-COPIED SIGNATURES IN ANY
 SITUATION.*
  
 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED
 DO NOT COORDINATE WITH THE LIGHTING AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
 PLEASE SEE 2001 FBC 13-400.1.A, 13-415.2 ETC
 PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING IS AN EXAMPLE FOR ITEMS WHICH
 DO NOT COMPLY OR COORDINATE WITH PLANS. THE INPUT DATA
 REPORT WILL BE NOTED AS IDR
 FOR EXAMPLE:
 PLEASE SEE THE LIGHTING SHOWN FOR EXTERIOR ON PLANS IS
 SUBSTANTIALLY MORE THAN THE LIGHTING SHOWN ON THE IDR.
 THE WATTAGES OF THE FIXTURES SHOWN ON PLANS IN
 FOLLOWING AREAS SUCH AS PARKING LOT, DRIVEWAY, POOL
 AREA, DECK, OUTSIDE WALL LIGHTS ON GROUND FLOOR AND
 UPPER ROOF AREAS ETC IS WAY MORE THAN THE LIGHTING
 SHOWN ON THE IDR. PLEASE SEE THE TOTAL WATTAGE ON THE
 IDR FOR EXTERIOR LIGHTS SHOWS 887WATTS, YET THE
 LIGHTING FOR DRIVE AREA ALONE IS 1800WATTS.
 FOR EXAMPLE:
 PLEASE SEE THE LIGHTING ON E-1 FOR THE EXTERIOR OF THE
 BUILDING. WHERE ARE THESE FIXTURES ON THE IDR? THEY ARE
 NOT PLACED IN THE IDR.
 THIS DOES NOT EVEN INCLUDED DOZENS AND DOZENS OF OTHER
 FIXTURES WHICH ARE MISSING FROM THE IDR ALTOGETHER.
 HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE?
 PLEASE SEE THE CODE REQUIRES THESE FIXTURES TO BE
 PLACED INTO THE IDR.
  
 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE PREVIOUS REVIEWS REQUESTED THE
 MANUFACTURES SPECS/CUT SHEETS FOR THE FIRE PUMP AND
 FIRE PUMP CONTROLLER. THIS IS THE FIRST REVIEW IN WHICH
 THESE DOCUMENTS WERE SUBMITTED.
 PLEASE SEE THE LISTING STATED ON THESE DOCUMENTS
 INDICATE A ULC LISTING WHICH IS UNDERWRITERS
 LABORATORIES OF CANADA.
 PLEASE KNOW THIS LISTING IS NOT A RECOGNIZED EQUIPMENT
 TO BE USED IN THE UNITED STATES. THE LISTING WOULD BE
 REQUIRED TO SHOW A C UL US LISTED OR OTHER NATIONALLY
 RECOGNIZED TESTING LABORATORY (NRTL). PLEASE SEE OSHA
 FOR LATEST LISTING FOR PRODUCTS AND LISTINGS WHICH ARE
 ACCEPTABLE IN THE US.
 WE HAVE ATTACHED A COPY OF THE INFORMATION FROM UL
 WHICH CLEARLY SHOWS THE ULC IS NOT AN APPROVED LISTING
 IN THE US.
  
  
  
 ** THIS OFFICE EXPRESSES THAT IF THERE ARE ANY
 COMMENTS, QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION NEEDED TO PLEASE
 DO NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE.
 PLEASE SEE BELOW FOR CONTACT INFORMATION.
  
 ** IMPORTANT**
 ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP FOR
 CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL
 OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED SHEETS
 INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. DO NOT
 LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS.
 PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY
 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS,
 SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO
 TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC.
 PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS
 SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE.
 THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID ANY
 DELAYS.
  
 DEWEY PALMER
 ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II
 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT.
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 561-805-6717
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 5 Status F Date 2008-02-06 Cont ID  
Sent By dpalmer Date 2008-02-06 Time 19:23 Rev Time 0.00
Received By dpalmer Date 2008-02-06 Time 16:49 Sent To  
Notes
2008-02-06 19:23:232008-02-06 19:23:23
  
 ** DENIED REVISIONS FOR THIRD REVIEW **
  
 CLARKES HOTEL
 REVISIONS FROM PREVIOUS PERMITTED 5 STORY TO 8-STORY
 HIGH RISE.
  
 ** PLEASE SEE MANY NOTES FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW ARE STILL
 IN NEED OF ADDRESSING.
 PLEASE SEE SOME NEW COMMENTS BASED ON NEW SUBMITTED
 DOCUMENTS NOT PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW. PLEASE
 SEE SOME OF THE SAME EXACT SHEETS THIS REVIEWER
 PERSONALLY REDLINED FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW WERE SUBMITTED
 BACK IN NEW SETS WITHOUT ANY CHANGES.
 THIS REVIEWER HAS PLACED DIRECT PHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL
 ADDRESS ON ALL PREVIOUS REVIEWS AND NO CONTACT WAS MADE
 TO GO OVER ANY OF THESE ITEMS SINCE THE LAST REVIEW.
  
  
  
 1) NOTE:AS REQUESTED ON ALL PREVIOUS REVIEWS:PLEASE
 SUBMIT ALL THE MANUFACTURE SPECS/CUT SHEETS FOR ALL OF
 THE FOLLOWING. PLEASE SUBMIT FOR; FIRE PUMP, FIRE PUMP
 CONTROLLER, GENERATOR, FUEL TANK. (SEENOTES BELOW),
 ATS EQUIPMENT (SEENOTES BELOW). 110.3, 90.7.PLEASE
 KNOW AT THIS TIME THERE ARE SEVERAL ITEMS WHICH REMAIN
 UNANSWERED FOR REQUIRED CODE ITEMS AND COORDINATION OF
 PLANS WITH OUT THESE ITEMS.
 PLEASE SEE THERE ARE SEVERAL ITEMS IN NFPA-110 AND
 NFPA-20 WHICH CAN NOT BE REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE AND
 COORDINATION WITHOUT THESE DOCUMENTS BEING SUBMITTED.
  
 2) NOTE: AS REQUESTED ON ALL PREVIOUS REVIEW:PLEASE
 SUBMIT COMPLETE PHOTO-METRICS FOR ALL EGRESS PATHS
 WHICH MEET THE MINIMUM LIFE SAFETY CODE7.8.1.3,
 7.9.2.2. THE MINIMUM LEVELS UNDER THE THESE SECTIONS
 REQUIRE 10FT CANDLE MIN FOR STAIRS UNDER NORMAL AND 1FT
 CANDLE UNDER EMERGENCY.
 PLEASE SEE FOR EXAMPLE EGRESS STAIRS A SPECIFICALLY
 MENTIONED ON PREVIOUS REVIEWS WHICH STILL SHOW LESS
 THAN THE MINIMUM OF 10FT CANDLES UNDER NORMAL. PLEASE
 SEE SHEET E-4A WHICH IS THE SAME EXACT SHEET WHICH WAS
 PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. THIS SHEETS STILL CONTAINS
 REDLINES BY REVIEWER ALONG WITH NEW REDLINES TO HELP
 RESOLVE.
 PREVIOUS REVIEW ALSO MENTIONED TO SHOW LEVELS UNDER
 BOTH EMERGENCY AND NORMAL.
 PREVIOUS REVIEWS ALSO REQUESTED COORDINATION BETWEEN
 FIXTURES FROM THE PHOTO-METRICS TO LIGHTING PLANS FOR
 FIXTURE TYPES. FOR EXAMPLE: PLEASE SEE THE SAME EXACT
 SHEETS FOR SHEET E-1 WERE SUBMITTED BACK WITH THIS
 REVIEWERS SAME REDLINED FIXTURES WHICH CLEARLY SHOW HE
 AND DE FIXTURES ON LIGHTING PLANS AND YET THE SAME
 SHEET FOR THE SAME FIXTURES ON THE PHOTO-METRICS
 INDICATE FE AND EE FIXTURES. HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE?
 WHICH FIXTURES ARE PROPOSED?
 PLEASE SEE FAC 61G15-33.004. THIS SECTION OF THE
 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE IS WITH RESPECT TO MINIMUM
 REQUIREMENTS FOR LIGHTING DESIGN BY THE ENGINEERING
 PROFESSIONAL.
  
 3) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW BASED ON THE NEW ELECTRICAL DATA
 SUBMITTED FOR THE PARKING LIFT SYSTEM, ALL EQUIPMENT
 MUST BE LISTED ASSEMBLY. THE DOCUMENTS CLEARLY STATE UL
 LISTED COMPONENTS OR PARTS, HOWEVER COULD NOT LOCATE
 ANY LISTING FOR SYSTEM CONTROL PANELS ETC.
 PLEASE SUBMIT LISTED SYSTEM DOCUMENTS OR KNOW THE
 SYSTEM WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE LISTED BY A NRTL(
 NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED TESTING LABORATORY) BEFORE FINAL.
 THIS WOULD INCLUDE ALL INSTALLED AT RISK WITH *PROVISO*
 TO OBTAIN LISTINGS.
 110.3
  
 4) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES THE
 LIGHTNING PROTECTION SYSTEM NOTED ON PLANS WILL BE
 REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED UNDER SEPARATE PLANS AND
 PERMIT.
 ALL WORK SHALL BE PER NFPA-780 AND MASTER LABEL SHALL
 ALSO BE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE CITY FOR RECORD PLANS.
  
 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NO REVISED FBC ENERGY CALCULATIONS
 WERE SUBMITTED AS REQUIRED PER FBC CHAPTER 13. PLEASE
 KNOW AS THE FIXTURES HAVE CHANGED AND ENERGY
 CONSUMPTION HAS CHANGED, THIS WILL AFFECT THE
 STRUCTURE. PLEASE SUBMIT THESE ENERGY CALCULATIONS
 BASED ON THE 2001 CODE WHICHIS WHAT THIS PROJECT IS
 PERMITTED UNDER.
 FBC CHAPTER 13, 13-400.1.A, 13-415.2 ETC
  
 6) NOTE: PLEASE VERIFY THE SMOKE DEVICES IN UNITS ARE
 IN FACT SMOKE DETECTORS AS SHOWN OR SMOKE ALARMS PER
 NFPA-72. PLANS CAME BACK STILL SHOWING THESE AS SMOKE
 DETECTORS. IF THESE DEVICES DETECT SMOKE AND SOUND AN
 ALARM FROM THE UNIT ITSELF THEN THIS IS A SMOKE *ALARM*
 AND NOT DETECTOR. A SMOKE DETECTOR ONLY DETECTS AND
 DOES NOT SOUND AN ALARM. BASED ON PLANS AND DESIGN, IF
 THESE WERE SMOKE DETECTORS, EACH UNIT WOULD REQUIRE A
 FIRE ALARM PANEL.
 PLEASE CALL TO GO OVER THIS IF THERE ARE STILL ANY
 QUESTIONS.
  
 7) NOTE: AS REQUESTED ON ALL PREVIOUS REVIEWS: PLEASE
 SUBMIT THE REVISED FIXTURE SCHEDULE/LEGEND WHICH IS NOT
 ON ELECTRICAL PLANS. PLEASE BE SURE TO COORDINATE ALL
 INFORMATION ON THE FIXTURE LEGEND WITH THAT OF THE
 INPUT DATA REPORT ON UPDATED ENERGY CALCULATIONS TO BE
 SUBMITTED.
 ORIGINAL PLANS CLEARLY DID CONTAIN THE INFORMATION AND
 WAS REMOVED.
 FBC CHAPTER 13, NFPA-101, NFPA-70 ETC
 FBC 104.1.2
  
 8) NOTE:THIS NOTE IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY: PLEASE
 KNOW BASED ON THE OCCUPANCY USE AT THIS TIME NEWLY
 PASSED HOUSE BILL 7121 DOES NOT APPLY HOWEVER GIVEN
 INFORMATION AT THIS TIME IF THE USE WAS TO CHANGE FROM
 HOTEL TO CONDOS, THEN HB 7121 WOULD APPLY.
 THIS IS ONLY NOTED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND NO CHANGE
 NEEDS TO MADE TO PLANS FOR CURRENT USE.
  
 9) NOTE: AS STATED ON THE PREVIOUS REVIEW:PLEASE SEE
 NFPA-110 CHAPTER 7,7.2.3 FOR MIN ELEVATION REQUIRED
 FOR ALL EPSS EQUIPMENT INCLUDING GEN.
 PLEASE PROVIDE MIN LEVELS FOR "SLOSH" ( SEA, LAKE,
 OVERLAND , SURGES, BY HURRICANES) CHARTS BASED ON A CAT
 4 STORM OR THE 100YR ELEVATION ON PLANS.
 THE RESPONSE MENTIONS, BUILDING LOCATED ABOVE FLOOD
 LEVEL. PLEASE KNOW HOWEVER THE MINIMUM LEVEL FOR EPSS
 EQUIPMENT BASED ON THE CHARTS NOTED ABOVE NEEDS TO BE
 STATED AND SHOWN ON PLANS. PLEASE SEE NO ELEVATIONS ON
 ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR LIFE SAFETY EQUIPMENT IS BEING
 SHOWN. (FIRE PUMP ON MEZZANINE LEVEL IS NOT NEEDED) AS
 THIS IS A GIVEN DUE TO ITS LOCATION.
 SAME NOTE:
  
 10) NOTE:PLEASE SEE THE GROUNDING ELECTRODE FOR THE
 FIRE PUMP SERVICE HAS NOW BEEN REMOVED??
 PREVIOUS NOTE WAS WITH RESPECT TO THE SIZE OF THE
 GROUNDING ELECTRODE CONDUCTOR BEING TOO SMALL AND NOW
 IT CAN NOT BE LOCATED?
 PLEASE ALSO SEE THE FEEDER SCHEDULE INDICATES AN
 *EQUIPMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTOR* NOW FROM THE FPL
 TRANSFORMER TO THE FIRST MEANS OF DISCONNECT WHICH IS
 NOT PERMITTED PER 250.6 AND 250.24.
 PLEASE CALL TO GO OVER THIS SCENARIO IN ORDER TO MAKE
 THE NEEDED ADJUSTMENTS.
 PLEASE SEE 250.50, 250.66 ETC
  
 11) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE FUEL TANK IS NOW SHOWN AS 400
 GALLONS ON THE FUEL CALCULATIONS AND 500 GALLONS ON
 RISER UNDER GENERATOR?
 WHICH ONE IS IT?
 PLEASE SEE NOTES ABOVE WITH RESPECT TO THE SUBMISSION
 OF MANUFACTURES SPECS/CUT SHEETS.
 FBC 104.1.2 FOR COORDINATION OF PLANS.
  
 12) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE FP SHEETS SHALL STATE THE CODE
 RELEVANT FOR DESIGN. THIS COULD BE REDLINED IF THIS WAS
 THE ONLY COMMENT ON SHEET FP-1 THIS SHOULD REFLECT 1999
 NFPA-20 ( CAN NOT BE LATEST EDITION AS THERE IS MOST
 CERTAINLY ONE NEW NFPA-20ALREADY ADOPTED BY THE STATE
 AND WILL HAVE ANOTHER NEW CODE ADOPTED BY THE STATE
 BEFORE FINAL.
  
 13) NOTE: AS REQUESTED ON PREVIOUS REVIEWS: THIS
 COMMENT WILL REMAIN AS THE INFORMATION WHICH WILL BE
 SUBMITTED ON GENERATOR WILL CONFIRM AVAILABLE FAULT
 CURRENT ON THE GENERATOR. THE LEVELS ON THE MANUFACTURE
 SPECS/CUT SHEETS WILL ALSO BE REVIEWED.
 PLEASE PROVIDE ALL AIC RATINGS FOR ALL EQUIPMENT, ATS,
 DISCONNECTS ETC. PLEASE SEE 701.6, NFPA-20 6-3.2.2.4,
 110.9, 240.12 ETC. PLEASE SEE NFPA-110 6.5.2 ETC.
 PLEASE BE SURE ALL EQUIPMENT/MANUFACTURE SPECS/CUT
 SHEETS SHOWS THIS COORDINATION.
 THE MOST IMPORTANT PART OF THIS COMMENT IS THE
 SELECTIVE COORDINATION REQUIRED FOR LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS
 AS NOTED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW PER 240.12 OF THE NEC AND
 OTHER SECTIONS OF NFPA-110 ETC
 PLEASE SUBMIT THE SELECTIVE COORDINATION STUDY FOR THE
 REQUIRED AND LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS.
 FAC 61G15-33.003
 FBC 104.1.2 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
  
 14) NOTE:PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEWS REQUESTED THE
 MINIMUM LEVELS FOR ADA COMPLIANCE WITH RESPECT TO HORN
 AND STROBE LEVELS. THE PLANS DO NOT SHOW ALL LEVELS,
 HOWEVER SYMBOL LEGEND WAS REVISED FOR STROBE LEVELS.
 THE NOTES HOWEVER FOR HORN AND SOUND LEVELS STATE
 LEVELS SHALL MEET NFPA-72. THIS IS TRUE TO A POINT AS
 THEY ARE REQUIRED TO MEET THE MINIMUM LEVELS PER
 NFPA-72 HOWEVER THE LEVELS PER THE FBC ARE MORE
 RESTRICTIVE WHICH WOULD APPLY.
 PLEASE ADJUST LEVELS AND NOTES.
 SECTIONS GIVEN IN PREVIOUS REVIEWS: PLEASE PROVIDE ALL
 MINIMUM AUDIBLE AND VISUAL LEVELS PER FBC 2001 11-4.28,
 11-4.28.2 AND MOST IMPORTANT 11-4.28.3(4). ALL AREA AS
 STATED IN 11-4.28.1 SHALL BE NOTED AND INCLUDED.
  
 15) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW A RESPONSE LETTER FROM DESIGN
 TEAM IS NOT REQUIRED HOWEVER DOES HELP IN THE REVIEW
 PROCESS. AS CONTACT WAS NOT MADE WITH THIS OFFICE SINCE
 LAST REVIEW PLEASE SEE NOTE BELOW.
  
 AS STATED ON THE PREVIOUS REVIEW:
 PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR
 COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF
 THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY,
 NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO
 NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS
 REVIEWER.
  
 * ** IMPORTANT**
 ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP FOR
 CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL
 OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED SHEETS
 INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. DO NOT
 LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS.
 PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS
 SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE.
 THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID ANY
 DELAYS.
  
  
 DEWEY PALMER
 ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II
 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT.
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 561-805-6717
 [email protected]
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2007-08-24 Cont ID  
Sent By dpalmer Date 2007-08-24 Time 17:59 Rev Time 0.00
Received By dpalmer Date 2007-08-14 Time 13:40 Sent To  
Notes
2007-09-17 16:51:24**** NOTE ADDED***
  
 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FBC 2001, CHAPTER 13,
 415.1.ABCD.1.1.4 FOR REQUIRED MISSING MASTER LIGHTING
 CONTROL SWITCH.
 ** PLEASE SEE LIGHTING PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS IN
 13-415.2
 PLEASE SEE ALL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE 2001 FBC CHAPTER 13
 WHICH ARE REQUIRED TO BE MET.
  
 THIS COMMENT WAS NOT MADE ON PREVIOUS REVIEW HOWEVER IT
 IS REQUIRED OF THE DESIGN TEAM TO MEET THE MINIMUM
 REQUIREMENTS OF THE FBC.
2007-08-24 18:00:112007-08-24 18:00:11
  
 *** DENIED2ND REVIEW OF REVISIONS ***
  
 *** PLEASE SEE SOME COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW ARE
 STILL IN NEED OF ADDRESSING ALONG WITH NEW COMMENTS
 BASED ON SOME INFORMATION ON REVISED PLANS.
  
 ** REVIEW FOR REVISION OF CLARKES HOTEL FROM 5-STORIES
 TO 8 STORIES.
  
 ** PLEASE KNOW THAT AT THIS TIME THERE IS NOT ENOUGH
 INFORMATION SUBMITTED FOR A COMPLETE REVIEW FOR CODE
 COMPLIANCE AS THE BUILDING HAS NOW BEEN CLASSIFIED AS A
 HIGH-RISE.
 PLEASE SEE SOME ITEMS WERE NOT SUBMITTED AS PREVIOUSLY
 REQUESTED FOR REVIEW.
  
  
 1) NOTE:THIS IS THE SAME NOTE AS SOME SHEETS STILL
 ONLY INDICATE LESS REVISIONS THAN THE PROJECT HAS
 PLEASE SEE THAT ALL REVISIONS ON PLANS SHALL BE DATED,
 CLOUDED/TRIANGLE NOTATIONS ACCORDINGLY. PLEASE SEE
 DATES AND REVISION NUMBERS SHOW A REV #1, HOWEVER THIS
 HAS BEEN REVISED AT LEAST THREE OR FOUR TIMES. HOW IS
 THIS FIRST REVISION??
  
 2) NOTE: PLEASE CLARIFY HOW SHEET E-3 BE TYPICAL FOR
 ALL FLOORS WHEN THE FLOOR PLAN LAYOUT FOR THE
 ELECTRICAL ROOMS ARE DIFFERENT. THE LARGER ROOMS WOULD
 INDEED AFFECT THE FLOOR PLANS FOR LAYOUTS OF WALLS,
 SPACES ETC.
 PLEASE PROVIDE EACH.
 FBC 104.1.2
  
 3) NOTE: AS REQUESTED ON THE PREVIOUS REVIEW:PLEASE
 SUBMIT ALL THE MANUFACTURE SPECS/CUT SHEETS FOR ALL OF
 THE FOLLOWING. PLEASE SUBMIT FOR; FIRE PUMP, FIRE PUMP
 CONTROLLER, GENERATOR, FUEL TANK. (SEENOTES BELOW),
 ATS EQUIPMENT (SEENOTES BELOW). 110.3, 90.7 PLEASE
 KNOW AT THIS TIME THERE ARE SEVERAL ITEMS WHICH REMAIN
 UNANSWERED FOR REQUIRED CODE ITEMS AND COORDINATION OF
 PLANS WITH OUT THESE ITEMS.
  
 4) NOTE: AS REQUESTED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW:
 PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETE PHOTO-METRICS FOR ALL EGRESS
 PATHS. (ALL CORRIDORS AND STAIR TOWERS) PLEASE SEE
 LS-1017.8.1.3, 7.9.2.2 10FT CANDLE MIN FOR STAIRS UNDER
 NORMAL AND 1FT CANDLE UNDER EMERGENCY.
 PLEASE SEE THERE ARE SEVERAL STAIR AREAS WHERE NO
 PHOTO-METRIC LEVELS WERE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW. PLEASE
 ALSO SEE THAT THE COMMENT REQUESTED THE LEVELS UNDER
 NORMAL AND UNDER EMERGENCY.
 PLEASE SEE SOME STAIR AREAS WHICH SHOW LEVELS ARE UNDER
 THE MINIMUM AS REQUIRED PER THE LIFE SAFETY CODE UNDER
 NORMAL.
 PLEASE SUBMIT THESE FOR ALL EGRESS PATHS TO THE PUBLIC
 RIGHT OF WAY AWAY FROM BUILDING.
 ** EXAMPLE: PLEASE SEE STAIRS FROM MEZZANINE LEVEL TO
 REAR OF BUILDING ON E-2, PLEASE SEE ROOF PLANS FROM
 POOL AREA WHICH CONTAINS STAIRS HOWEVER NO LEVELS WERE
 SHOWN.
 ** IMPORTANT: PLEASE SEE NOW THE PHOTO-METRICS HAVE
 BEEN SUBMITTED AND FIGURED SHOWING DIFFERENT FIXTURES
 THAN THAT ON PLANS FOR THE SAME LOCATIONS.
 FE, IS HE ETC.
 FAC 61G15-33.004
  
 5) NOTE:THIS NOTE REMAINS AS IT IS NOT KNOWN WHETHER
 OR NOT PLANS AND PERMITTING FOR GARAGE WILL BE REQUIRED
 AT THIS TIME.
 PLEASE SEE ZONING COMMENTS, PLEASE SEE IF A GARAGE IS
 NOW REQUIRED, THIS WILL COMPLETELY CHANGE ELECTRICAL
 SERVICE AND ELECTRICAL SHEETS SUBMITTED.
  
 6) NOTE: PLEASE VERIFY THE SMOKE DEVICES IN UNITS ARE
 IN FACT SMOKE DETECTORS AS SHOWN OR SMOKE ALARMS PER
 NFPA-72.
 PLEASE SEE AS SHOWN WITH THE 120V POWER AND IF THERE
 ARE DETECTION AND SOUNDING DEVICES THESE WOULD IN FACT
 BE *SD* FOR SMOKE ALARMS.
 PLEASE KNOW THAT A STATEMENT WAS ISSUED FROM NFPA THAT
 THESE DEVICES SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED FOR USE AND
 THE GENERAL ACCEPTANCE OF USING SD FOR ACTUAL SMOKE
 ALARMS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED.
  
 7) NOTE: AS REQUESTED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW: PLEASE SEE
 ALL FIXTURE SCHEDULE AND TYPE INFORMATION WHICH WAS ON
 PREVIOUS PLANS HAS BEEN REMOVED FOR EM FIXTURES? PLEASE
 SEE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING IN ORDER TO REVIEW FOR CODE
 COMPLIANCE SHALL BE PLACED BACK ON PLANS.
 LS 101.
 THE RESPONSE MENTIONS THIS WAS NOT DONE, HOWEVER PLEASE
 SEE THE ORIGINAL PERMITTED SETS OF PLANS CLEARLY
 INDICATE THIS SCHEDULE/LEGEND ON SHEET E1.
 PLEASE SEE THE FIXTURE LEGEND ON SHEET E-6 DOES NOT
 CLEARLY INDICATE THE BATTERY BACK UP FOR CERTAIN
 FIXTURES WHICH WAS INDICATE ON LEGEND ON PREVIOUS
 PLANS.
 PLEASE SEE COMMENT #4 ABOVE WITH RESPECT TO THE
 DIFFERENCES ON PLANS IF LIGHTING FIXTURES.
  
 8) NOTE:AS REQUESTED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW:
 PLEASE SEE THAT NOW THAT A GENERATOR IS INSTALLED AND
 REQUIRED AND USE IS TO A HIGH-RISE, PLEASE SEE NFPA-20
 6-6.2 AS THE MINIMUM FUEL REQUIRED FOR FIRE PUMP IS
 8HRS AT 100%, AND 5% FOR EXPANSION AND 5% FOR SUMP.
 PLEASE SEE TANK AS SHOWN AND FUEL CALCULATIONS CAN NOT
 VERIFIED AS NO INFORMATION WAS SUBMITTED.
 ** PLEASE SEE THE RESPONSE LETTER GIVES SOME
 INFORMATION HOWEVER ALSO STATES 30GALLONS PER MINUTE
 FOR USE.
 PLEASE KNOW THE CALCULATIONS FOR CONSUMPTION NEEDS TO
 BE SHOWN ON PLANS.
 PLEASE SEE COMMENTS BELOW AS THE SIZE OF THE FIRE PUMP
 DOES NOT COORDINATE ON PLANS. PLEASE ALSO BE AWARE THAT
 THE INFORMATION ON MANUFACTURES SPECS/CUT SHEETS HAS
 NOT BEEN SUBMITTED TO CONFIRM OR COORDINATE WITH
 PLANS.
  
 9) NOTE: THIS REMAINS: PLEASE SEE NFPA-20 CHAPTER 6 AND
 7 FOR FIRE PUMP, ASTHERE ARE TOO MANY SECTIONS TO BE
 LISTED FOR ITEMS NEEDED FOR REVIEW.
 PLEASE SEE THAT BESIDES THE MISSING MANUFACTURES
 SPECS/CUT SHEETS, PLEASE SEE THE RISER SHEETS SHOWS TWO
 DIFFERENT SIZES OF FIRE PUMPS, TWO DIFFERENT SIZES OF
 OVER CURRENT PROTECTION OF MAINS ETC.
 VERIFICATION OF SEVERAL ITEMS CAN NOT BE DONE AT THIS
 TIME. (CONDUCTORS, OVER CURRENT PROTECTION, CORRECT
 GROUNDING (SEE COMMENT BELOW) CONDUIT SIZES, ISOLATION
 SWITCHES ETC.
 ** IMPORTANT, SEE COMMENT WITH RESPECT TO THE GENERATOR
 BEING NOTED AS BEING A *SEPARATELY DERIVED SYSTEM*
 WHICH WOULD REQUIRE THE FIRE PUMP CONTROLLER ATS TO BE
 FOUR POLE.
  
 10) NOTE: AS STATED ON THE PREVIOUS REVIEW:PLEASE SEE
 NFPA-110 CHAPTER 7,7.2.3 FOR MIN ELEVATION REQUIRED
 FOR ALL EPSS EQUIPMENT INCLUDING GEN.
 PLEASE PROVIDE MIN LEVELS FOR "SLOSH" ( SEA, LAKE,
 OVERLAND , SURGES, BY HURRICANES) CHARTS BASED ON A CAT
 4 STORM OR THE 100YR ELEVATION ON PLANS.
 THE RESPONSE MENTIONS, BUILDING LOCATED ABOVE FLOOD
 LEVEL. PLEASE KNOW HOWEVER THE MINIMUM LEVEL FOR EPSS
 EQUIPMENT BASED ON THE CHARTS NOTED ABOVE NEEDS TO BE
 STATED AND SHOWN ON PLANS. PLEASE SEE NO ELEVATIONS ON
 ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR LIFE SAFETY EQUIPMENT IS BEING
 SHOWN. (FIRE PUMP ON MEZZANINE LEVEL IS NOT NEEDED) AS
 THIS IS A GIVEN DUE TO ITS LOCATION.
  
 11) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE GROUNDING ELECTRODE SHOWN FOR
 THE FIRE PUMP SERVICE IS TOO SMALL BASED ON 250.66.
 PLEASE ADJUST. (SHOWN AS #4 ON E-7)
  
 12) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE SIZE OF THE FIRE PUMP
 CONTROLLER ON E-7 SHOWN AS 800AMPS AND 500AMPS? PLEASE
 CORRELATE WITH THE UPDATED SIZE OF THE NEW FIRE PUMP.
 FBC 104.1.2 FOR COORDINATION.
  
 13) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE NOTE BELOW THE GENERATOR
 CLEARLY STATES THE GENERATOR WILL BE A SEPARATELY
 DERIVED SYSTEM, YET IF THIS IS THE CASE, THE OTHER NOT
 ON THE GROUNDING ELECTRODE AT GENERATOR STATES ONLY
 GROUND TO CASE WHICH DOES NOT CONFIRM OR CORRELATE WITH
 THE SEPARATELY DERIVED NOTE.
 PLEASE ALSO KNOW IF INDEED THIS IS A SDS, PLEASE ADJUST
 RISER AS ALL ATS EQUIPMENT WILL NEED TO BE FOUR POLES.
 250.20,250.30 ETC
  
 14) NOTE: AS REQUESTED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW: THIS COMMENT
 WILL REMAIN AS THE INFORMATION WHICH WILL BE SUBMITTED
 ON GENERATOR WILL CONFIRM AVAILABLE FAULT CURRENT ON
 THE GENERATOR. THE LEVELS ON THE MANUFACTURE SPECS/CUT
 SHEETS WILL ALSO BE REVIEWED.
 PLEASE PROVIDE ALL AIC RATINGS FOR ALL EQUIPMENT, ATS,
 DISCONNECTS ETC. PLEASE SEE 701.6, NFPA-20 6-3.2.2.4,
 110.9, 240.12 ETC. PLEASE SEE NFPA-110 6.5.2 ETC.
 PLEASE BE SURE ALL EQUIPMENT/MANUFACTURE SPECS/CUT
 SHEETS SHOWS THIS COORDINATION.
  
 15) NOTE: THIS NOTE REMAINS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE
 #18.
 PLEASE SEE MISSING A DISCONNECTING MEANS REQUIRED FOR
 THE FEEDERS COMING FROM THE GENERATOR TO MEET
 701.11(B)5.
 ** PLEASE SEE THAT THE RESPONSE MENTIONS THE GENERATOR
 MEETS THE EXCEPTION, HOWEVER KNOWN TO THIS OFFICE IS
 THE REQUIREMENTS FROM ZONING WHICH WILL NEED A
 WALL/SCREENING AROUND THE UNIT ON ALL FOUR SIDES. THIS
 WOULD ALSO LOCK THE BREAKER ON THE INSIDE OF THE UNIT
 WHICH WOULD NOT BE READILY ACCESSIBLE.
 PLEASE SEE THAT BREAKERS SOMETIMES MAY BE USED, HOWEVER
 THEY MAY NOT
  
 19) NOTE: AS REQUESTED FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW: PLEASE
 PROVIDE DETAIL FOR VERTICAL CONDUCTOR SUPPORTS PER
 300.19(A).
 ** RESPONSE LETTER MENTIONS TO SEE DETAIL ON E-7,
 HOWEVER NO DETAIL COULD BE LOCATED ON THIS SHEET AS
 REFERENCED.
  
 20) NOTE:THIS NOTE REMAINS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE
 #21.
 PLEASE PROVIDE ALL MINIMUM AUDIBLE AND VISUAL LEVELS
 PER FBC 2001 11-4.28, 11-4.28.2 AND MOST IMPORTANT
 11-4.28.3(4). ALL AREA AS STATED IN 11-4.28.1 SHALL BE
 NOTED AND INCLUDED. THIS COMMENT WAS NEVER UNDER
 ELECTRICAL REVIEW SCOPE ON PREVIOUS REVIEWS UNTIL
 RECENTLY.
 ** RESPONSE LETTER MENTIONS TO SEE REVISED NOTES ON
 FA-5 WHICH WAS LOCATED HOWEVER THE PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE
 REQUESTED ALL MINIMUM LEVELS TO BE STATED ON LEGEND FOR
 THE REQUIRED DEVICES. PLEASE SEE THE DEVICES STILL DO
 NOT INDICATE THE LEVELS.
 PLEASE KNOW THAT QUOTING THE CODE SECTIONS IN LIEU OF
 THE REQUIRED DETAIL FOR CONSTRUCTION AND DESIGN IS NOT
 ACCEPTABLE AND MUST SHOW DESIGN DETAIL.
  
 21) NOTE:AS REQUESTED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE #22.
 PLEASE INCLUDE A NOTE ON ROOF TOP PLANS WHICH WILL
 STATE THAT "ANY LIGHTNING PROTECTION SYSTEM TO BE
 INSTALLED SHALL MEET NFPA-780" OR WORDS TO THAT AFFECT.
 A SYSTEM IS NOT REQUIRED, HOWEVER THE NOTE IS, AS THERE
 ARE MANY SYSTEMS BEING "PROMOTED AND SOLD" IN THE STATE
 OF FLORIDA WHICH ARE STRICTLY NOT PERMITTEDAND MANY
 KNOWN SYSTEMS ARE ACTUALLY A HEALTH AND LIFE SAFETY
 HAZARD. PLEASE SEE ONLY IF IN NFPA-780.
 ** PLEASE KNOW THERE ARE SEVERAL ITEMS NOT YET SHOWN,
 CLARIFIED OR SUBMITTED. AS STATED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW
 THERE MAY VERY WELL BE NEW COMMENTS ON THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW ONCE THE COMPLETED PLANS ARE SUBMITTED.
 ** RESPONSE LETTER MENTIONS THIS WAS ADDED TO NOTES ON
 SHEET E-4 HOWEVER THIS WAS NOT LOCATED ON THIS SHEET
 AND NOTE COULD NOT BE FOUND.
 PLEASE COMPLETE.
  
 AS STATED ON THE PREVIOUS REVIEW:
 PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR
 COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF
 THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY,
 NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO
 NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS
 REVIEWER.
  
 DEWEY PALMER
 ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II
 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT.
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 561-805-6717
 [email protected]
2007-08-24 07:54:552007-08-24 07:54:55
 REVIEW IN PROGRESS
2007-08-14 13:41:041-SET IN ELEC FOR REVIEW.
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2006-10-29 Cont ID  
Sent By dpalmer Date 2006-10-29 Time 08:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By dpalmer Date 2006-10-28 Time 19:23 Sent To  
Notes
2006-10-29 08:28:03****UNSAT ****
  
 ** REVIEW FORE REVISION OF CLARKES HOTEL FROM 5-STORIES
 TO 8 STORIES.
  
 ** PLEASE KNOW THAT AT THIS TIME THERE IS NOT ENOUGH
 INFORMATION SUBMITTED FOR A COMPLETE REVIEW FOR CODE
 COMPLIANCE AS THE BUILDING HAS NOW BEEN CLASSIFIED AS A
 HIGH-RISE. PLEASE SEE ONLY SOME NOTES BELOW ARE NOTED
 FOR ITEMS NEEDED.
  
 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THAT ALL REVISIONS ON PLANS SHALL
 BE DATED, CLOUDED/TRIANGLE NOTATIONS ACCORDINGLY.
 PLEASE SEE DATES AND REVISION NUMBERS SHOW A REV #1,
 HOWEVER THIS HAS BEEN REVISED AT LEAST THREE OR FOUR
 TIMES. HOW IS THIS FIRST REVISION??
  
 ** PLEASE KNOW AS THIS BUILDING IS COMPLETELY CHANGING
 IN DESIGNATION; PLEASE PROVIDE A COMPLETE SET OF
 REVISED ELECTRICAL PLANS AS SUBMITTING FOR A NEW
 BUILDING. A FULL REVIEW WILL BE BASED ON THE SUBMITTED
 PLANS.
  
 2) NOTE: PLEASE LIST ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AT A
 MINIMUM ON PLANS.
 2002 NFPA-72(DONE), 1999 NFPA-20, 2003 NFPA-101, 2002
 NFPA-110.
 IT IS KNOW THAT THIS PROJECT CAME IN UNDER THE 2001
 FBC.
  
 3) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT ALL THE MANUFACTURE SPECS/CUT
 SHEETS FOR ALL OF THE FOLLOWING. PLEASE SUBMIT FOR;
 FIRE PUMP, FIRE PUMP CONTROLLER, GENERATOR, FUEL TANK.
 (SEENOTES BELOW), ATS EQUIPMENT (SEENOTESBELOW).
 110.3, 90.7
  
  
 4) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETE PHOTO-METRICS FOR ALL
 EGRESS PATHS. (ALL CORRIDORS AND STAIR TOWERS) PLEASE
 SEE LS-1017.8.1.3, 7.9.2.2 10FT CANDLE MIN FOR STAIRS
 UNDER NORMAL AND 1FT CANDLE UNDER EM.
  
 ** PLEASE ALSO BE AWARE OF ZONING COMMENTS AS
 PHOTO-METRICS WILL ALSO BE REQUIRED FOR FUTURE PARKING
 GARAGE.
  
 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ZONING COMMENTS, PLEASE SEE IF A
 GARAGE IS NOW REQUIRED, THIS WILL COMPLETELY CHANGE
 ELECTRICAL SERVICE AND ELECTRICAL SHEETS SUBMITTED.
  
 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS PLANS WHICH WERE RED-LINED
 FOR CIRCUITING OF ELEVATOR MACHINE ROOMS PER 620.23,
 620.24 AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT. THIS HAS NOT BEEN
 CORRECTED ON PLANS TO DATE.
  
 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ALL FIXTURE SCHEDULE AND TYPE
 INFORMATION WHICH WAS ON PREVIOUS PLANS HAS BEEN
 REMOVED FOR EM FIXTURES?
 PLEASE SEE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING IN ORDER TO REVIEW FOR
 CODE COMPLIANCE SHALL BE PLACED BACK ON PLANS.
 LS 101
  
 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THAT NOW THAT A GENERATOR IS
 INSTALLED AND REQUIRED AND USE IS TO A HIGH-RISE,
 PLEASE SEE NFPA-20 6-6.2 AS THE MINIMUM FUEL REQUIRED
 FOR FIRE PUMP IS 8HRS AT 100%, AND 5% FOR EXPANSION AND
 5% FOR SUMP.
 PLEASE SEE TANK AS SHOWN AND FUEL CALCULATIONS CAN NOT
 VERIFIED AS NO INFORMATION WAS SUBMITTED.
  
 9) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NFPA-20 CHAPTER 6 AND 7 FOR FIRE
 PUMP, ASTHERE ARE TOO MANY SECTIONS TO BE LISTED FOR
 ITEMS NEEDED FOR REVIEW.
  
 10) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NFPA-110 CHAPTER 7,7.2.3 FOR MIN
 ELEVATION REQUIRED FOR ALL EPSS EQUIPMENT INCLUDING
 GEN.
 PLEASE PROVIDE MIN LEVELS FOR "SLOSH" ( SEA, LAKE,
 OVERLAND , SURGES, BY HURRICANES) CHARTS BASED ON A CAT
 4 STORM OR THE 100YR ELEVATION ON PLANS.
  
 11) NOTE: PLEASE SEE POOL AREA PHOTO-METRICS ARE TO BE
 REVIEWED AND STAMPED BY THE PALM BEACH COUNTY HEALTH
 DEPARTMENT IF ANY SWIMMING WILL TAKE PLACE OR PERMITTED
 FROM DUSK TO DAWN. PLEASE KNOW THAT THE POOL WILL ALSO
 BE REQUIRED UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT.
 IF NO SWIMMING , PLEASE PROVIDE NOTES ON THESE PLANS AT
 THIS TIOME, EVEN THOUGH THE POOL WILL BE UNDER A
 SEPARATE PERMIT.
  
 12) NOTE: PLEASE SEE SOME SHEETS ARE MISSING TITLE
 BLOCK INFORMATION AS REQUIRED FOR ENGINEER. PLEASE SEE
 MISSING THE PRINTED NAME, PRINTED LICENSE # AND MISSING
 THE DATE WHEN PLANS WERE SIGNED AND SEALED.
 PLEASE SEE FS 471.025, FAC 61G15-23.002
  
 13) NOTE: PLEASE CORRELATE AND LABEL ALL MAINS ON
 SCHEDULES, RISER AND MAIN ELECTRICAL ROOM(S). PLEASE
 SEE SCHEDULES DO NOT CORRELATE WITH RISER, ETC. 230.2E
 ETC,
  
 14) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE ALL AIC RATINGS FOR ALL
 EQUIPMENT, ATS, DISCONNECTS ETC. PLEASE SEE 701.6,
 NFPA-20 6-3.2.2.4, 110.9, 240.12 ETC. PLEASE SEE
 NFPA-110 6.5.2 ETC.
 PLEASE BE SURE ALL EQUIPMENT/MANUFACTURE SPECS/CUT
 SHEETS SHOWS THIS COORDINATION.
  
 15) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NEC 11.26 FOR MAXIMUM DISTANCE A
 GUTTER OR ANY OTHER EQUIPMENT SHALL PROTRUDE IN FRONT
 OF EQUIPMENT. (6") PLEASE SEE RISER AND PROVIDE A SIDE
 ELEVATION TO INDICATE IF EQUIPMENT WILL BE MOUNTED OUT
 FROM THE WALL.
 PLEASE ALSO SEE THE FOLLOWING COMMENT FOR SIZING GUTTER
 TO MAIN 2 AND 3 ON RISER. (SHOWN AS DIFFERENT MAINS ON
 OTHER SECTIONS OF PLANS SEE NOTE #13).
  
 16) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 240.4C, AS THE SEC'S FROM FPL TO
 GUTTER SHALL BE RATED AT 1200A?S OR ABOVE.
 90.4.
  
 17) NOTE: PLEASE ALSO VERIFY THE SIZE OF THE GUTTER FOR
 MAINS #2 AND #3 ON RISER. PLEASE SEE 366.
  
 18) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MISSING A DISCONNECTING MEANS
 REQUIRED FOR THE FEEDERS COMING FROM THE GENERATOR TO
 MEET 701.11(B)5.
  
 19) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE DETAIL FOR VERTICAL CONDUCTOR
 SUPPORTS PER 300.19(A).
  
 20) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NFPA-110 FOR ATS EPSS EQUIPMENT
 SECTION: 7.2.2.1TRANSFER SWITCHES SHALL BE PERMITTED
 TO BE INSTALLED IN THE NORMAL ELECTRICAL SERVICE ROOM
 WHERE TWICE THE CLEARANCE REQUIRED BY ARTICLE 110.26(A)
 OF NFPA 70, NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE, EXISTS BETWEEN
 EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURES.
 THIS DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE MET AT THIS TIME.
  
 21) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE ALL MINIMUM AUDIBLE AND VISUAL
 LEVELS PER FBC 2001 11-4.28, 11-4.28.2 AND MOST
 IMPORTANT 11-4.28.3(4). ALL AREA AS STATED IN 11-4.28.1
 SHALL BE NOTED AND INLCUDED. THIS COMMENT WAS NEVER
 UNDER ELECTRICAL REVIEW SCOPE ON PREVIOUS REVIEWS UNTIL
 RECENTLY.
  
 22) NOTE: PLEASE INCLUDE A NOTE ON ROOF TOP PLANS WHICH
 WILL STATE THAT "ANY LIGHTNING PROTECTION SYSTEM TO BE
 INSTALLED SHALL MEET NFPA-780" OR WORDS TO THAT AFFECT.
 A SYSTEM IS NOT REQUIRED, HOWEVER THE NOTE IS,AS THERE
 ARE MANY SYSTEMS BEING "PROMOTED AND SOLD" IN THE STATE
 OF FLORIDA WHICH ARE STRICTLY NOT PERMITTEDAND MANY
 KNOWN SYSTEMS ARE ACTUALLY A HEALTH AND LIFE SAFETY
 HAZARD. PLEASE SEE ONLY IF IN NFPA-780.
  
 ** PLEASE KNOW AS THERE IS INFORMATION NOT YET
 SUBMITTED. PLEASE KNOW THERE MAY BE FUTURE COMMENTS.
  
 ** IMPORTANT**
 ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE
 PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE
 SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED
 SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED
 SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW
 AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY
 OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS.
 PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE
 OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED
 FOR REFERENCE.
 THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND
 AVOID ANY DELAYS.
  
 PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMATION FOR
 REVIEW. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS,
 PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CALL.
  
 DEWEY PALMER
 ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW
 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT.
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 561-805-6717
 [email protected]
  
  
  
  
2006-10-29 06:55:15REVIEW IN PROGRESS
2006-10-28 19:23:25ONE ROLL IN ELECTRICAL FOR REVIEW.
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2005-07-20 Cont ID  
Sent By dpalmer Date 2005-07-20 Time 07:21 Rev Time 2.00
Received By dpalmer Date 2005-07-19 Time 12:28 Sent To  
Notes
2005-07-20 00:00:00PLANS OK, STAMPED THREE SETS OF
 ELECTRICAL PLANS.
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2005-04-19 Cont ID  
Sent By dpalmer Date 2005-04-19 Time 13:22 Rev Time 0.00
Received By dpalmer Date 2005-04-18 Time 16:56 Sent To  
Notes
2005-04-19 00:00:00***** UNSAT ******
  
 1)NOTE: PLEASE SEE E-1 ELECTRICAL ROOM
 LAYOUT WHICH DOES NOT INLCUDE ANY
 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT ,HOWEVER THIS ROOM
 SHOWS A NEW EF-7?
 PLEASE CORRELATE WITH "BLOW-UP" OF
 ELECTRICAL RM ON E-7
  
 2)NOTE: PLEASE SEE MAINS FOR ELEVATOR'S
 SHALL BE LABELED MAIN 4 OF 5 AND 5 OF 5.
 230.70,71 ETC.
  
 3)NOTE: PLEASE SEE 620.23 ETC FOR
 CIRCUITING.
  
 4)NOTE: PLEASE SEE AN EQUIPMENT
 GROUNDING CONDUCTOR IS INSTALLED FROM
 FPL TO FIRST MEANS OF DISCONNECT FOR
 FIRE PUMP AND FIRE PUMP CONTROLLER.
 PLEASE SEE 250.6,250.24, EQUIPMENT
 GROUNDING IS ONLY INSTALLED AFTER THE
 FIRST MEANS OF DISCONNECT.
  
 PLEASE KNOW, IF PLANS DO NOT COME BACK
 WITH ANY COMMENTS FROM ANY OF THE OTHER
 REVIEWER(S) THIS MAY BE DONE AS A
 PROVISO FOR NEW REVISED SHEETS TO BE
 PROVIDED BEFORE ANY SLAB INSPECTION.
  
  
 PLEASE BE SURE TO REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED
 SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED
 SHEETS INTO THREE COMPLETE SETS FOR
 REVIEW AND STAMPING.
  
 PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMATION FOR
 REVIEW. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS,
 PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CALL.
  
 DEWEY PALMER
 ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 CONSTUCTION SERVICES DEPT.
 561-805-6717
 [email protected]
  
2005-04-18 00:00:00ONE ROLL IN ELECTRICAL FOR REVIEW.
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 7 Status P Date 2008-07-11 Cont ID  
Sent By rchokshi Date 2008-07-11 Time 16:08 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rchokshi Date 2008-07-11 Time 16:08 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 6 Status F Date 2008-07-03 Cont ID  
Sent By rchokshi Date 2008-07-03 Time 13:44 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rchokshi Date 2008-07-03 Time 11:32 Sent To  
Notes
2008-07-03 11:55:02***FAILED**** PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING:
  
  
 1.PLEASE SHOW ON DRAWINGSDUMPSTER & ITS ENCLOSURE
 DETAILS PER CITY OF WPB, &LOCATION ON DWG, LOCATION
 MUST BE ACCESSIBLE FOR PICKUP TRUCK.
  
 2. HOW DO YOU CONNECT TO THE STORM WATER PIPES IN YOUR
 SITE? PLEASE SHOW ON THE DRAWINGS.PLEASE SHOW ALL
 STORM WATER PIPES AROUND YOUR SITE SO, WE CANSEE THE
 LAYOUT OF STORM WATER PIPES FROM ALL OTHER STORM WATER
 PIPES. PLEASE SHOW LENGTH OF EXFILTRATION TRENCHES ON
 THE DRAWING PER YOUR WATER QUALITY CALS SUBMITTED TO
 US. YOU NEED TO SHOW THE DETAILS OF EX-FILTRATION
 TRENCH ALSO ON THE DRAWING.
  
 3.PLEASE SHOW ALL CATCH BASINSIN YOUR SITE & NEAREST,
 AROUND YOUR SITE FOR STORM WATER DRAIN. PLEASE SHOW ON
 DRAWINGS TURBIDITY DETAILS & TURBIDITY AROUND THE ALL
 CATCH BASINS & ALL OTHER WATER AREAS FOR THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION. ETC., HEIGHT OF THE TURBIDITYSHOULD BE
 HIGH ENOUGH PER FDEP.
  
 PLEASE RESPOND EACH ITEM IN DETAIL TO EXPEDITE YOUR
 PERMITTING PROCESS
  
 RASIK CHOKSHI805-6723
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 5 Status F Date 2008-05-01 Cont ID  
Sent By rchokshi Date 2008-05-01 Time 09:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rchokshi Date 2008-05-01 Time 09:23 Sent To  
Notes
2008-05-01 09:28:31****FAILED****
  
  
 PLEASE RESPOND THE COMMENTS LAST TIME WE MADE ON
 8/28/07, REV NO: 3
  
 YOURCOMMENT NOTEON PLAN/PERMIT REVISION &
 SUBMITTALS FORM SUBMITTED ON APRIL 15, 08 SAYS THAT
 ENGINEERING PLANS WILL BE SUBMITTED LATER. AS OF NOW WE
 DO NOT HAVE THEM.
  
 RASIK CHOKSHI805-6723
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2008-01-15 Cont ID  
Sent By rchokshi Date 2008-01-15 Time 11:00 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rchokshi Date 2008-01-15 Time 10:57 Sent To  
Notes
2008-01-15 11:00:45****FAILED****
  
  
 PLEASE RESPOND THE COMMENTS LAST TIME WE MADE ON
 8/28/07, REV NO: 3
  
 RASIK CHOKSHI805-6723
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2007-08-28 Cont ID  
Sent By rchokshi Date 2007-08-28 Time 15:53 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rchokshi Date 2007-08-28 Time 15:31 Sent To  
Notes
2007-08-28 15:52:55***FAILED**** PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING:
  
 PERMIT # 03121642 IS EXPIRED.MR. M. AMINI WROTE IN
 REV 1, OF # 05031185 THAT PLANS WERE REVIEWED IN #
 03121642.THE PERMIT # 03121642 WAS 5 STORY, NEW
 PERMIT IS 8STORY BUILDING.
 SINCE OLD PERMIT IS EXPIRED, WE NEED TO REVIEW THIS
 PERMIT PER CURRENT REQUIREMENTS.
  
 1. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF NOTICE OF INTENT (NOI).
 PLEASE APPLY AT FDEP, NPDES STORMWATER SECTION FOR
 NOI.
 YOU CAN GET NOI INFO FROM
 WWW.DEP.STATE.FL.US/WATER/STORMWATER/NPDES/
 NOTICE OF INTENT DEP FORM 62-621.300(4)(B),
 EFFECTIVE MAY 1, 2003
 2. PLEASE SHOW ON DRAWINGSDUMPSTER & ITS ENCLOSURE
 DETAILS PER CITY OF WPB, &LOCATION ON DWG, LOCATION
 MUST BE ACCESSIBLE FOR PICKUP TRUCK.
 3. FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION, CENTER LINE OF ROAD ,
 SIDEWALK ELEVATION MUST MEET FLOOD ZONE AREA, & 5,10,
 25, 100 YEAR FLOOD CRITERIATO DETERMINE THE FIRST
 FLOOR ELEVATION, PLEASE SHOW IN YOUR STORM WATER CALS.
 4. PLEASE SHOW ON DRAWINGTHE SITE AREA, YOU ARE
 DEVELOPING FOR THIS PROJECT . PLEASE ALSO SHOW TOTAL
 PERVIOUS,& IMPERVIOUS AREA FOR THIS PROJECT,
 LAKE,SIDEWALK, PARKING,BUILDING AREA ETC. MAKE SURE
 THESE AREAS SHOWN ON DRAWINGS MUST MATCH WITH AND USED
 IN STORM WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS.
 5. HOW DO YOU CONNECT TO THE STORM WATER PIPES IN YOUR
 SITE? ITS DETAILS.PLEASE SHOW ALL STORM WATER PIPES
 AROUND YOUR SITE SO, WE CANSEE THE LAYOUT OF STORM
 WATER PIPES FROM ALL OTHER STORM WATER PIPES. PLEASE
 SHOW DETAIL OF THE CONTROL STRUCTURESWITH
 ELEVATIONS, NOTCHES, BLEEDING ELEVATION, ETC ON
 DRAWINGS, CALCULATION FOR EXFILTRATION TRENCHES,
 PLEASE SHOW DRY DETENTION/WET DETENTION AREAS IN STORM
 WATER CALS.
 6. ALSO PLEASE SHOW ALL CATCH BASINS NEAREST,AROUND
 YOUR SITE FOR STORM WATER DRAIN.
 7. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF SFWMD PERMIT,, &STORM
 WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS,
 9. PLEASE SHOW ON DRAWINGS THE POLLUTION PREVENTION
 DETAILS,CLOTHES USED FOR SILT ETC., PLANS SHOWING SILT
 FENCE AROUND THE SITE & CATCH BASINS.HEIGHT OF FENCE
 SHOULD BE HIGH ENOUGH PER FDEP TO STOP DUST &
 PARTICLES.
 10. WATER & SEWER PLANS MUST BE APPROVED FROM 45TH
 STREET (MANNY G.), UTILITY DEPT BEFORE WE APPROVED
 11.PLEASE SHOW ON DRAWING ALL CITY STANDARDS NOTES FOR
 SIDEWALK, DRIVEWAY, APPROACH, PARKINGS, HANDICAP
 PARKINGS, DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, YOU CAN GET A C D FROM
 1000, 45 STREET FOR ALL THESE CITY STANDARDS NOTES.
 PHONE# 494-1040
  
 PLEASE RESPOND EACH ITEM IN DETAIL TO EXPEDITE YOUR
 PERMITTING PROCESS
  
 RASIK CHOKSHI805-6723
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2006-11-03 Cont ID  
Sent By rchokshi Date 2006-11-03 Time 14:35 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rchokshi Date 2006-11-03 Time 14:35 Sent To  
Notes
2006-11-03 14:35:00PLEASE TELL US WHAT DID YOU CHANGE THIS TIME FROM LAST
 APPROVAL IN YOUR DRAWINGS.CHANGES, ANYTHING FOR
 STORMWATER DRAINAGE, EXFILTRATION TRENCH, CONTROL
 STRUCTURES, DUMPSTER ENSLOSURE,SIDEWALK,PARKINGS,ADA,
 HANDICAP, PERVIOUS , IMPERVIOUS AREA.DID YOU HAVE
 ANYTHINGS CHANGE, PLEASE REPLY IN WRITING WHAT YOU
 CHANGED OR NO CHANGE FROM WHAT DATE ETC.,
  
 THANKS, RASIK CHOKSHI805-6723
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2005-05-31 Cont ID  
Sent By mamini Date 2005-05-31 Time 10:43 Rev Time 1.00
Received By mamini Date 2005-05-31 Time 10:43 Sent To  
Notes
2005-05-31 00:00:00PASSED:
  
 1. CIVIL PLANS WERE REVIEWED AND
 APPROVED UNDER PERMIT # 03121642 WHICH
 WAS EXPIRED.NEW CIVIL PLANS AS
 SUBMITTED SHOW NO CHANGES.
  
 IF ANY QUESTION PLEASE CONTACT 805-6723
 MOHAMMAD R. AMINI
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 8 Status P Date 2008-07-11 Cont ID  
Sent By mwennerg Date 2008-07-11 Time 15:51 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mwennerg Date 2008-07-11 Time 15:51 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 7 Status F Date 2008-07-09 Cont ID  
Sent By mwennerg Date 2008-07-09 Time 14:29 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mwennerg Date 2008-07-09 Time 14:29 Sent To  
Notes
2008-07-09 14:40:13***DENIED***
  
 1) PLEASE ADDRESS COMMENTS FROM LAST FIRE REVIEW. SHEET
 C-8 HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED AS REVISED FOR FIRE REVIEW.
 PLEASE ADVISE AS ALL CIVIL SHEETS APPEAR TO BE NEW.
 WHAT HAS BEEN REVISED ON SHEET C-8 THAT REQUIRES A FIRE
 REVIEW? NOTHING WAS LOCATED RELATED TO FIRE PROTECTION
 EQUIPMENT. YOUR RESPONSE INDICATES EQUIPMENT TO BE
 FOUND ON FA-01 AND FA-02. THE FIRE REVIEW COMMENT
 APPLIES TO MONITORING, NOT SUPERVISORY EQUIPMENT FOR
 THE DOUBLE DETECTOR CHECK ASSEMBLY.
  
  
 MIKE WENNERGREN, ASSISTANT FIRE MARSHAL
 FIRE PLAN REVIEW
 FIRE PREVENTION (561) 804-4756
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 6 Status F Date 2008-05-23 Cont ID  
Sent By mawillia Date 2008-05-23 Time 14:32 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mawillia Date 2008-05-23 Time 13:26 Sent To  
Notes
2008-05-24 19:33:59*****DENIED*****
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS TAKEN FROM THE PREVIOUS FIRE
 PLAN REVIEWS STILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED:
  
  
 03.PLEASE PROVIDE A CLEAR DETAIL REGARDING
 SUPERVISING EQUIPMENT ON DOUBLE DETECTOR CHECK ASSEMBLY
 ON SHEET C-8.YOUR RESPONSE INDICATED THAT DETAILS
 WERE NOW SHOWN ON SHEET C-8, HOWEVER NO CIVIL DRAWINGS
 WERE FOUND
  
 11.SMOKE/PRESSURIZATION AND VENTILATION INDICATES
 THAT SYSTEM IS SIZED FOR MAXIMUM OF FIVE STORIES.
 PLEASE ADVISE NOW THAT THE PROJECT IS EIGHT STORIES.
 DISPLAY/SHOW THAT THE SYSTEM IS CAPABLE OF ADEQUATE
 FUNCTIONING FOR THE EIGHT STORY BUILDING.
  
 12.THE DRAWING ON SHEET AC-8 (REGARDING THE SMOKE
 CONTROL PANEL) APPEARS TO NEED MORE DETAIL.PLEASE
 CALL/CONTACT THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION AT
 561-804-4724 TO PROVIDE A DRAWING FOR REVIEW BY THIS
 OFFICE.PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION THAT THIS ARRANGEMENT
 WAS APPROVED BY BATTALION CHIEF MIKE CARSILLO ON
 03/12/08
  
 13.FIRE ALARM AND FIRE SPRINKLER PLANS WILL NEED TO
 BE UPDATED ILLUSTRATING NEW BATTERY CALCULATIONS AND
 SPRINKLER MODIFICATION FOR NEW PROPOSED FLOORS AT TIME
 OF PERMIT APPLICATION FOR REFERENCED SYSTEMS.PROVIDE
 DOCUMENTATION THAT THIS ARRANGEMENT WAS APPROVED BY
 BATTALION CHIEF MIKE CARSILLO ON 03/12/08
  
  
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A RESPONSE LETTER TO FIRE PLAN REVIEW
 ADDRESSING THESE COMMENTS.IT WOULD BE HELPFUL TO
 INDICATE WHERE ON THE PLANS THE CHANGE IS ADDRESSED.
  
  
 CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS
 FIRE PLAN REVIEW
 561-805-6722
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 5 Status F Date 2008-03-04 Cont ID  
Sent By mwennerg Date 2008-03-04 Time 13:02 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mwennerg Date 2008-03-04 Time 13:02 Sent To  
Notes
2008-03-04 13:16:29***DENIED***
  
 PLEASE NOTE THAT SOME OF THE COMMENTS HAVE BEEN
 ADDRESSED. A RESPONSE LETTER WAS SUBMITTED REFERRING
 REVIEWERS TO THE MEP ENGINEER. I WAS UNABLE TO LOCATE
 THE LETTER SPECIFIC TO THE FIRE REVIEW COMMENTS.
  
 1) OK
  
 2) RESPONSE REFERS TO ENGINEER'S RESPONSE.
  
 3) RESPONSE REFERS TO CIVIL ENGINEER'S RESPONSE.
  
 4) RESPONSE REFERS TO ENGINEER'S RESPONSE.
  
 5) OK
  
 6) OK
  
 7) OK
  
 8) OK
  
 9) RESPONSE REFERS TO ENGINEER'S RESPONSE.
  
 10) SMOKE DETECTORS ARE STILL NOT SHOWN IN CORRIDOR
 142.
  
 11) RESPONSE REFERS TO ENGINEER'S RESPONSE.
  
 12) RESPONSE REFERS TO ENGINEER'S RESPONSE.
  
 13) RESPONSE REFERS TO ENGINEER'S RESPONSE.
  
 14) RESPONSE REFERS TO ENGINEER'S RESPONSE.
  
 I UNDERSTAND THAT SOME COMMENTS MAY BE THE
 RESPONSIBILTY OF DIFFERENT INDIVIDUALS, BUT IT WOULD
 HELP EXPEDITE THIS PROCESS IF RESPONSES WERE
 CONSOLIDATED AND PROVIDED WITH THE SUBMITTAL AT ONE
 TIME.
  
  
 MIKE WENNERGREN, ASSISTANT FIRE MARSHAL
 FIRE PLAN REVIEW
 FIRE PREVENTION (561) 804-4756
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2007-09-13 Cont ID  
Sent By mwennerg Date 2007-09-13 Time 13:59 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mwennerg Date 2007-09-13 Time 13:59 Sent To  
Notes
2007-09-13 14:16:45***DENIED***
  
 PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS PROJECT HAS CHANGED FROM FIVE (5)
 STORIES TO EIGHT (8) STORIES, AND SHALL MEET ALL
 REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 101, CHAPTER 11 FOR HIGHRISE
 BUILDINGS.
  
 1) HIGHRISE BUILDINGS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH AS MINIMUM
 OF TWO (2) FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS WITH KNOX
 LOCKING CAPS. PLANS DO SHOW (2) CONNECTIONS.
  
 2) FIRE ALARM SYSTEM TO MEET SURVIVABILITY
 REQUIREMENTS.
  
 3) PLEASE PROVIDE A CLEAR DETAIL REGARDING SUPERVISING
 EQUIPMENT ON DOUBLE DETECTOR CHECK ASSEMBLY. SHEET C-8
  
 4) PLANS CALL OUT KNOX BOXES WITH LOCKING CAPS. PLEASE
 CLARIFY AND CORRECT AS LOCKING CAPS WOULD BE REQUIRED
 FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS.
  
 5) PLEASE ADD INFORMATION REGARDING ACCESS OR NO ACCESS
 TO ROOF ON STAIRWELL TACTILE SIGNAGE.
  
 6) LIFE SAFETY SHEETS ILLUSTRATE THE FIRE RATING OF
 SOME DOORS. PLEASE INDICATE THE FIRE RATING OF THE DOOR
 TO THE FIRE COMMAND ROOM.
  
 7) PLEASE PROVIDE FIRE RATING OF DOORS TO THE PUMP
 ROOM, GENERATOR ROOM AND ELECTRICAL ROOM. SHEET A-124
  
 8) EXIT SIGNS SHALL NOT SPAN A DISTANCE GREATER THAN
 100'.
  
 9) FIRE COMMAND ROOM STILL DOES NOT SHOW A SMOKE
 DETECTOR. SHEET FA-1
  
 10) SMOKE DETECTORS ARE NOT SHOWN IN CORRIDOR 142.
 PLEASE ADVISE IF THAT AREA IS PART OF THIS SCOPE OF
 WORK.
  
 11) SMOKE/PRESSURIZATION AND VENTILATION INDICATES THAT
 SYSTEM IS SIZED FOR MAX. OF (5) STORIES. PLEASE ADVISE
 NOW THAT PROJECT IS (8) STORIES.
  
 12) PLEASE CONTACT THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION
 REGARDING THE SMOKE MANAGEMENT PANEL. THE DRAWING ON
 SHEET AC-8 APPEARS TO NEED MORE DETAIL. PLEASE CALL
 (561) 804-4724 TO PROVIDE A DRAWING FOR REVIEW BY THIS
 OFFICE.
  
 13) FIRE ALARM AND FIRE SPRINKLER PLANS WILL NEED TO BE
 UPDATED ILLUSTRATING NEW BATTERY CALCULATIONS AND
 SPRINKLER MODIFICATION FOR NEW PROPOSED FLOORS AT TIME
 OF PERMIT APPLICATION FOR REFERENCED SYSTEMS.
  
 14) KNOX BOX AND LOCKING CAP APPLICATIONS MAY BE
 OBTAINED AT THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. (561)
 804-4724
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A RESPONSE LETTER TO FIRE PLAN REVIEW
 ADDRESSING THESE COMMENTS. IT WOULD BE HELPFUL TO
 INDICATE WHERE ON THE PLANS THE CHANGE IS ADDRESSED.
  
  
 MIKE WENNERGREN, ASSISTANT FIRE MARSHAL
 FIRE PLAN REVIEW
 FIRE PREVENTION (561) 804-4756
  
  
  
  
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2006-10-31 Cont ID  
Sent By mwennerg Date 2006-10-31 Time 14:15 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mwennerg Date 2006-10-31 Time 14:15 Sent To  
Notes
2006-10-31 14:27:34***DENIED***
  
 1) FIRE SPRINKLER COVERAGE AND SUITE NUMBER APPEAR TO
 BE MISSING IN AREA OFF COURTYARD 147. SHT FP-1
  
 2) SOME BATHROOMS ARE SPRINKLERED AND SOME ARE NOT.
 PLEASE CLARIFY IF THIS IS BASED ON SQUARE FOOTAGE
 DIFFERENCES OR JUST AN OVERSIGHT.
  
 3) A SMOKE DETECTOR IS REQUIRED IN FIRE COMMAND ROOM IN
 THE AREA OF THE FIRE ALARM CONTROL PANEL.
  
 4) SMOKE MANAGEMENT PANEL SHALL PROVIDE A GRAPHIC
 REPRESENTATION OF THE BUILDING. HOA SWITCHES WITH NO
 OVERLAY OF THE BUILDING WILL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE.
  
 5) FIRE AND SMOKE DAMPERS SHALL BE TESTED FOR CLOSURE
 PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION.
  
  
 MIKE WENNERGREN, ASSISTANT FIRE MARSHAL
 FIRE PLAN REVIEW (561) 805-6722 OR (561) 804-4756
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2005-08-16 Cont ID  
Sent By mwennerg Date 2005-08-16 Time 14:37 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mwennerg Date 2005-08-16 Time 14:37 Sent To  
Notes
2005-08-16 00:00:00******APPROVED******
  
 TEMPORARY STANDPIPE SYSTEM IS REQUIRED
 WHEN BUILDING REACHES 3 STORIES OR 30'
 IN HEIGHT.
  
 FIRE ALARM SYSTEM SHALL BE UL CERTIFIED
 FOR CENTRAL STATION SERVICE, AND THE
 CERTIFICATE OR COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE
 WILL BE REQUIRED BEFORE FINAL FIRE ALARM
 INSPECTION APPROVAL.
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2005-04-21 Cont ID  
Sent By mwennerg Date 2005-04-21 Time 13:56 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mwennerg Date 2005-04-21 Time 13:55 Sent To  
Notes
2005-04-21 00:00:001) SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS AND PERMITS
 ARE REQUIRED FOR FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE
 ALARM SYSTEMS.
  
 2) LOCK CAPS ARE REQUIRED ON FIRE
 DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS.
  
 3) FDC LOCATIONS ARE DIFFERENT ON SHEETS
 SFP-1 AND FP-1. PLEASE INDICATE THE
 LOCATIONS.
  
 4) PLEASE INDICATE THE PRESCRIPTIVE CODE
 REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL HANDRAILS AND
 GUARDRAILS.
  
 5) PLANS DON'T SHOW ANY AUTOMATIC FIRE
 DETECTION DEVICES IN THE ELEVATOR
 HOISTWAYS.
  
 6) EMERGENCY LIGHTING IS REQUIRED IN THE
 FIRE PUMP ROOM.
  
  
 MIKE WENNERGREN, A/CAPTAIN
 WPBFR(561) 835-2910 OR 805-6722
Review Stop FUEL DIESEL GENERATOR
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2008-07-01 Cont ID  
Sent By rregueir Date 2008-07-01 Time 16:40 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rregueir Date 2008-07-01 Time 16:40 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop FUEL DIESEL GENERATOR
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2008-05-27 Cont ID  
Sent By rregueir Date 2008-05-27 Time 11:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rregueir Date 2008-05-27 Time 11:11 Sent To PC
Notes
2008-05-27 11:17:46SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS DATED 3/4/08. NONE OF THE
 REQUESTED INFORMATION COULD BE FOUND ON THE PLANS
 REGARDING THE SIZE OF THE TANK, VENTING OF THE TANK,
 VENTILATION AND EXHAUST FOR THE GENERATOR. PLEASE
 PROVIDE ALL RELEVANT INFORMATION SHOWING ALL COMPONENTS
 OF THE GENERATOR INSTALLATION.
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT:
 RONALD J. REGUEIRO
 561.805.6719
 [email protected]
Review Stop FUEL DIESEL GENERATOR
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2008-03-04 Cont ID  
Sent By rregueir Date 2008-03-04 Time 17:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rregueir Date 2008-03-04 Time 17:23 Sent To  
Notes
2008-03-04 17:28:17PLANS SHOW NEW STANDBY GENERATOR. PROVIDE ALL RELATED
 DOCUMENTATION RELATED TO THE GENERATOR AND GENERATOR
 ROOM INCLUDING:
  
 FUEL TANK
 FUEL PIPING
 VENTING
 VENTILATION OF GENERATOR ROOM
 LOCATION OF GENERATOR EXHAUST PIPING AND DISCHARGE
  
 NOTE: TANKS >550 GALLONS SHALL BE SUBMITTED AND
 APPROVED BY PALM BEACH COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF
 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT. FOR MORE INFORMATION
 PLEASE VISIT:
 HTTP://WWW.PBCGOV.COM/ERM/PERMITTING/PETROLEUM-STORAGE-
 TANK-COMPLIANCE/
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT:
 RONALD J. REGUEIRO
 561.805.6719
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop G GAS REVIEW
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2008-04-22 Cont ID  
Sent By kstevens Date 2008-04-22 Time 14:55 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kstevens Date 2008-04-22 Time 14:55 Sent To  
Notes
2008-04-22 14:55:42REVISION OK SHT P-9 GAS RISER & MANUF. SHEETS FOR
 HEATERS
Review Stop G GAS REVIEW
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2007-08-27 Cont ID  
Sent By kstevens Date 2007-08-27 Time 11:29 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kstevens Date 2007-08-27 Time 11:29 Sent To  
Notes
2007-08-27 11:30:12SEE COMMENTS FROM REVIEW STOP #7 PLUMBING
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 12 Status N Date 2008-06-09 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2008-06-09 Time 08:40 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2008-06-09 Time 08:40 Sent To  
Notes
2008-06-09 08:44:55TO "COMM" BD#21/PLANS ON RACK/7 ROLLS AND BINDERS
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 11 Status N Date 2008-04-15 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2008-04-15 Time 11:12 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2008-04-15 Time 11:12 Sent To  
Notes
2008-04-15 11:15:35TO "COMM" BD#6--PLANS ON RACK/6 ROLLS AND PAPERWORK
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 10 Status N Date 2008-01-11 Cont ID  
Sent By spalmer Date 2008-01-11 Time 17:36 Rev Time 0.00
Received By spalmer Date 2008-01-11 Time 17:36 Sent To  
Notes
2008-01-11 17:36:25TO COMM BOARD # 41
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 9 Status N Date 2007-07-11 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2007-07-03 Time 16:14 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2007-07-03 Time 16:13 Sent To  
Notes
2007-07-17 14:54:55TO "COMM" BD#20/ PLANS ON RACK--5 ROLLS
2007-07-11 16:14:32WAITING FOR "COMM" BD
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 8 Status N Date 2007-04-23 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2007-04-23 Time 15:29 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2007-04-23 Time 15:29 Sent To  
Notes
2007-04-30 09:09:34TO "COMM" BD#54/PLANS ON RACK 4 ROLLS
2007-04-23 15:29:50WAITING FOR "COMM' BD
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 7 Status N Date 2006-08-31 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2006-08-31 Time 16:01 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2006-08-31 Time 16:01 Sent To B
Notes
2006-08-31 00:00:00TO "RBROWN" DESK/REV
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 6 Status N Date 2006-08-25 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2006-08-25 Time 14:35 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2006-08-25 Time 14:35 Sent To  
Notes
2006-08-25 00:00:00TO "COMM" BD#37
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 5 Status N Date 2006-07-25 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2006-07-25 Time 11:29 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2006-07-25 Time 11:29 Sent To B
Notes
2006-07-25 00:00:00TO "RBROWN" DESK/REV
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 4 Status N Date 2006-07-10 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2006-07-10 Time 14:32 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2006-07-10 Time 14:32 Sent To B
Notes
2006-07-10 00:00:00TO "RBROWN" DESK/FOR STAMPING
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2005-07-22 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2005-07-22 Time 09:47 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2005-07-22 Time 09:47 Sent To  
Notes
2005-07-25 00:00:00TO "COMM" BD#2
2005-07-22 00:00:00WAITING FOR "COMM" BD
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2005-07-08 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2005-07-08 Time 14:29 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2005-07-08 Time 14:29 Sent To  
Notes
2005-07-08 00:00:00TO "COMM" BD #13/ PLANS ON RACK
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2005-03-23 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2005-06-02 Time 14:46 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 2005-03-23 Time 14:13 Sent To  
Notes
2005-03-23 00:00:00TO "COMM" BD#48/PLANS ON "COMM" RACK
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 7 Status P Date 2008-07-01 Cont ID  
Sent By rregueir Date 2008-07-01 Time 16:39 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rregueir Date 2008-07-01 Time 16:39 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 6 Status P Date 2008-03-04 Cont ID  
Sent By rregueir Date 2008-03-04 Time 17:22 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rregueir Date 2008-03-04 Time 15:28 Sent To B
Notes
2008-03-04 17:22:34MECH REVIEW COMMENTS ADDRESSED. PLEASE SEE FUEL REVIEW
 STOP FOR REQUIREMENTS RELATED THE THE GENERATOR FUEL
 STORAGE SYSTEM.
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 5 Status F Date 2007-08-05 Cont ID  
Sent By rregueir Date 2007-08-05 Time 12:33 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rregueir Date 2007-08-05 Time 11:28 Sent To  
Notes
2007-08-05 12:33:49---------------DENIED------------------
  
 2ND REVIEW OF REVISIONS.
  
 FBC 2001 CODE FAMILY.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE NUMBERED TO CORRESPOND WITH
 PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS FOR THE PURPOSE OF
 CONTINUITY.
  
 1. OK
  
 2. THE 4 INCH ROUND DRYER DUCT IS PENETRATING A RATED
 WALL INTO SUITE 210. HOW WILL THIS DUCT PENETRATION BE
 PROTECTED? ACCORDING TO FINISH SCHEDULE ON A-602, THE
 LAUNDRY ROOM HAS NO CEILING OTHER THAN THE EXPOSED
 CONCRETE FROM THE DECK ABOVE. IT DOES NOT MEET
 EXCEPTION (3)(4) UNDER FBC,M 607.1.3. SHOW HOW THE FIRE
 RESISTANCE RATING OF THE WALL IS TO BE MAINTAINED PER
 FBC,M 504.2.
  
 3. PROTECTION OF SHAFT AT BOTTOM IS NOW SHOWN ON CSR-1,
 BUT NONE IS SHOWN ON SER-1. PLEASE CORRECT.
  
 4. OK
  
 5. OK, EXCEPT FOR THE ISSUE AS STATED IN COMMENT #3.
  
 6. THE DISTANCE REQUIRED FOR SEPARATION OF INTAKE
 OPENINGS FROM SOURCES OF CONTAMINATION IS TO BE
 MEASURED HORIZONTALLY. NO PROVISIONS IS MADE IN THE
 CODE FOR INTAKE OPENINGS TO BE DIRECTLY ABOVE SOURCES
 OF CONTAMINATION GIVEN A CERTAIN ELEVATION DIFFERENCE.
 EXAMPLE: WHAT IF A LARGE TRUCK WITH VERTICAL EXHAUST
 PIPES WAS PARKED IN THE ALLEY UNDER THE INTAKE
 OPENING?
  
 7.PROVIDE DETAIL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FIRE WRAP
 MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS SHOWING
 WRAPPED DUCT PENETRATION OF THE RATED ENCLOSURE AND HOW
 THE FIRE WRAP IS TO TERMINATE AT THIS LOCATION.
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT:
 RONALD J REGUEIRO
 561.805.6719
 [email protected]
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2007-05-31 Cont ID  
Sent By rregueir Date 2007-05-31 Time 08:47 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rregueir Date 2007-05-31 Time 07:51 Sent To PC
Notes
2007-05-31 08:53:06----------------DENIED-------------------
  
 MECHANICAL REVIEW NOT COMPLETED. THE 3 SETS OF PLANS
 SUBMITTED FOR REVISION DO NOT MATCH EACH OTHER. TWO OF
 THE SETS CONTAIN PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED AND STAMPED PLANS,
 WHILE ONE SET IS ALL NEW SHEETS. THE TWO PREVIOUSLY
 STAMPED SETS CONTAIN PAGES WHICH STILL REFLECT THE 5
 STORY DESIGN OF THE BUILDING, WHILE THE ONE NEW SET
 SHOWS THE NEW 8 STORY DESIGN. EXAMPLE: PG A-201. PLEASE
 RESUBMIT 3 SETS OF REVISED PAGES ONLY, WITH ONE SET OF
 OLD/VOIDED SHEETS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW FOR REFERENCE.
 THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS.
  
 ONCE THE REVISED PAGES ARE REVIEWED AND STAMPED, WE
 WILL RETAIN ONE SET AND INCORPORATE THEM INTO OUR COPY
 OF THE PERMIT SET AND YOU MAY DO THE SAME WITH YOUR TWO
 COPIES OF THE PERMIT SET.
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT:
 RONALD J REGUEIRO
 561.805.6719
 [email protected]
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2006-10-26 Cont ID  
Sent By rregueir Date 2006-10-26 Time 18:04 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rregueir Date 2006-10-17 Time 18:10 Sent To  
Notes
2006-10-26 18:03:48--------------DENIED---------------
  
 REVIEWED UNDER FBC 2001
  
 1. PG AC-7 TER 1,2,3 BATH FAN SUB DUCTS DO NOT MEET
 EXCEPTION #2 UNDER FBC,M 607.1.3. THE AIR IN THE RISER
 MUST BE TRAVELING UPWARD IN ORDER TO CLAIM THIS
 EXCEPTION. THE MAIN EXHAUST FANS ARE LOCATED ON THE
 MEZZANINE LEVEL CAUSING THE AIRFLOW TO BE DOWNWARD.
  
 2. PG AC-3 LAUNDRY ROOM DRYER EXHAUST DUCT CAN NEITHER
 PENETRATE THE SIDE NOR THE BOTTOM OF THE RATED SHAFT
 BEHIND LAUNDRY ROOM. WHEN A SUITABLE LOCATION FOR DRYER
 EXHAUST DUCT IS DETERMINED, PLEASE PROVIDE
 MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS.THIS IS ONLY
 REQUIRED IF THE DEVELOPED DUCT LENGTH EXCEEDS 25 FEET
 PER FBC,M 504.6.
  
 3. PG AC-7 SER 1 DUCT PENETRATIONS AT BOTTOM OF SHAFTS
 ARE REQUIRED TO BE PROTECTED PER FBC 705.2.3.3.
 MOTORIZED FIRE/SMOKE DAMPERS ARE RECOMMENDED IN THESE
 LOCATIONS AS A STANDARD FUSABLE LINK FIRE DAMPER HAS
 THE POTENTIAL TO RENDER THESE LIFE SAFETY COMPONENTS
 INOPERABLE.
  
 4. MANUAL VOLUME DAMPERS ARE NOT REQUIRED ON SMOKE
 EXHAUST DUCT SYSTEMS AND SHOULD BE REMOVED TO PREVENT
 POTENTIAL RESTRICTION OF AIRFLOW UNDER EMERGENCY
 CONDITIONS.
  
 5. PG AC-7 TWO RISERS ON THIS PAGE ARE LABELED "SER 1".
 PLEASE GIVE EACH RISER A DISTINCTIVE NAME FOR CLARITY.
  
 6. PG AC-2 INTAKE OPENING FOR SF1,AHU1,AHU3 IS IN A
 PROHIBITED LOCATION PER FBC,M 401.5.1.
  
 7. PG AC-2 GREASE EXHAUST DUCT SHALL BE ENCLOSED IN A
 RATED SHAFT PER FBC,M 506.3.12.
  
 REVIEWED BY:
 RONALD J REGUEIRO
 561.805.6734
 [email protected]
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2005-07-29 Cont ID  
Sent By pkrauss Date 2005-07-28 Time 21:30 Rev Time 0.00
Received By pkrauss Date 2005-07-28 Time 21:29 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2005-05-26 Cont ID  
Sent By pkrauss Date 2005-05-26 Time 14:29 Rev Time 0.00
Received By pkrauss Date 2005-05-26 Time 14:29 Sent To  
Notes
2005-05-26 00:00:00DENIED:
 1.PLAN SHEET AC-1 INDICATES RETURN AIR
 PLENUM PENETRATING THE FLOOR TO AHU-1
 AND DOES NOT INDICATE A FIRE DAMPER.
 PER 2001 FBC/M 607.4, DUCTS PENTRATING
 ONLY ONE FLOOR CAN BE PROTECTED BY A
 FIRE DAMPER IN LIEU OF A SHAFT.
  
 2.PLAN SHEET AC-1, PLEASE CLARIFY
 TERMINATION OF EF-3.IT APPEARS TO
 TERMINTE AT STAIRWAY, PER 2001 FBC/M
 401.5.2, EXHAUST OPENINGS SHALL
 TERMINATE AS NOT TO CREATE A NUISANCE
 AND SHALL NOT BE DIRECTED ONTO WALKWAYS.
  
 3.THE PLANS INDICATE FUTURE RESTAURANT
 PLAS INDICATE THE TERMINATION OF GREASE
 DUCT ON THE ROOF.PLEASE NOTE GREASE
 DUCT SHALL BE ENCLOSED IN A 2 HR RATED
 SHAFT.
  
 4.PLANS INDICATE CORRIDORS BEING
 UTILIZED AS PLENUMS OR TRANSFERS.PER
 2001 FBC/M 601.2, EXITS & EXIT ACCESS
 CORRIDORS SHALL NOT BE SERVE AS RETURN,
 EXHAUST RELIEF OR VENTILATION AIR DUCTS
 OR PLENUMS.
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE
 CONTACT PATTY KRAUSS AT (561)805-6719.
Review Stop MEDGAS MEDICAL GAS
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2008-02-07 Cont ID  
Sent By kstevens Date 2008-02-07 Time 07:08 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kstevens Date 2008-02-07 Time 07:08 Sent To  
Notes
2008-02-07 07:09:21REVISION APPROVED--SHT P-11
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 11 Status P Date 2008-07-11 Cont ID  
Sent By kstevens Date 2008-07-11 Time 16:00 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kstevens Date 2008-07-11 Time 16:00 Sent To  
Notes
2008-07-11 16:01:23REVISION OK-- SHT P-9--SHT P-11 NOT REQUIRED AS
 REVISIONS 1 THRU 4 HAVE BEEN PREVIOUSLY APPROVED
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 10 Status F Date 2008-04-22 Cont ID  
Sent By kstevens Date 2008-04-22 Time 14:46 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kstevens Date 2008-04-22 Time 14:46 Sent To  
Notes
2008-04-22 14:50:53REVISION DENIED
 REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING
 FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1
  
 1. SHT P-9 NOT APPROVED. SHEET SHOWS SUITE 506 ABOVE
 THE 8TH FLOOR AND SUITE 406 JUST BELOW THE 8TH FLOOR.
 ALL RISERS SHALL INDICATE TYPICAL FOR THE PIPE SIZING
 FROM 5TH FLOOR THRU 7TH FLOOR OR 4TH FLOOR THRU 7TH
 FLOOR WHICHEVER OR SHOW THE PIPE SIZES THRU THE
 COMPLETE RISER. PLEASE CLARIFY. SECTIONS 106.1.1 &
 606.1.
  
 2. SHT P-11 NO NEW REVISIONS FOUND FROM SHEET REVIEWED
 ON FEB. 06, 2008, SIGNED, SEALED & DATED 12-05.2007.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE
 THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY
 PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER
 LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER,
 WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE,
 IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION
 PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND
 WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE
 ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE
 ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE
 COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED.
 THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.
  
 REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS
 (561) 805-6721
 FAX (561) 805-6731
 E-MAIL [email protected]
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 9 Status P Date 2008-04-22 Cont ID  
Sent By kstevens Date 2008-04-22 Time 14:44 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kstevens Date 2008-04-21 Time 12:39 Sent To  
Notes
2008-04-22 14:46:09REVISIONS APPROVED.--SHTS P-1 THRU P-8, P-10 &
 P-12.SHT P-1 REVISION #6 WAS NOT FOUND OR APPROVED.
 SHT P-12 REVISION #3 WAS NOT FOUND OR APPROVED.
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 8 Status F Date 2008-02-06 Cont ID  
Sent By kstevens Date 2008-02-06 Time 18:46 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kstevens Date 2008-02-05 Time 18:59 Sent To  
Notes
2008-02-06 19:02:46REVISION DENIED
 REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING
 FBC-2004 FUEL GAS
 FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1
  
 ****FROM PREVIOUS REVISION REVIEW:
  
 ******FROM PREVIOUS REVISION REVIEW:
  
 NOTE: MOST OF THESE SHEETS SUBMITTED ARE THE EXACT SAME
 SHEETS SUBMITTED AND DENIED ON THE LAST REVISION
 SUBMITTAL. NO CHANGES.
  
  
 1. SHTS P-1, P-4, P-5, P-7, P-8, P-9 & P-10 REVISIONS
 ARE INDICATED AS REVISIONS 1 & 2. REVISIONS 1 & 2 ARE
 ALREADY SUBMITTED. THE NEW REVISIONS NUMBERS SHALL STAY
 IN SEQUENCE ALREADY ESTABLISHED ON THESE PLANS AND, FOR
 EXAMPLE, SHT P-1 HAS REVISIONS 1 THRU 5, SO THE NEXT
 REVISIONS SHALL BE 6 & 7. PLEASE INDICATE THE CORRECT
 REVISION NUMBERS ON EACH REVISED SHEET ACCORDING TO
 PREVIOUS REVISIONS. SECTION 106.1.3.
 ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT P-1 STILL SHOWS A 2ND #2
 REVISION AND NEW REVISION #5 PREVIOUSLY DATED 03-07-05
 ON THE PLANS SIGNED, SEALED, AND DATED 3-11-05 HAS BEEN
 CHANGED TO 07-24-06. PLEASE CLARIFY. COMMENT HAS NOT
 BEEN ADDRESSED. ALSO PLEASE TURN OFF ALL PREVIOUSLY
 APPROVED REVISION CLOUDS AND REVISION NUMBERS ON THE
 PLAN. THIS WILL HELP EXPEDITE FUTURE REVISIONS AND
 ENABLE THE PLAN REVIEWERS TO REVIEW REVISIONS IN A
 TIMELY MANNER.--SHT P-4 REVISION #2 HAD AN ORIGINAL
 REVISION DATE 08-27-04, BUT THE NEW SHT P-4 SHOWS THE
 REVISION DATE 02-25-04 FOR THE SAME REVISION. PLEASE
 CLARIFY.
 ******RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THIS IS THE SAME SHEETS WITH
 THE SAME MARKINGS FROM THE PREVIOUS REVISION SUBMITTAL.
 NO CHANGES COMMENTS NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 2. OK
 ******SAME SHEET PREVIOUSLY APPROVED. NOT REQUIRED.
 3. OK
 ******SAME SHEET PREVIOUSLY APPROVED. NOT REQUIRED.
  
 4. OK
 5. OK
  
 ************NEW COMMENTS************
  
 1B. SHTS P-2 & P-3 REVISION #4 HAS BEEN CHANGED, THE
 ORIGINAL REVISION IS DATED 07-06-05, BUT THE NEW SHTS
 SHOWS REVISION #4 DATED 07-24-06. ALSO REVISIONS
 INDICATED ON 07-24-06 HAS NOT BEEN FOUND OR APPROVED.
 SINCE THERE WAS ALREADY A REVISION #4 SHOWN ON THE
 SIGNED, SEALED SHEETS DATED 07-06-05, ALL REVISIONS
 AFTER THAT DATE SHALL HAVE THEIR OWN REVISION NUMBER.
 THE REVISIONS SHALL BE SEQUENTIAL TO TRACK ALL
 REVISIONS. SECTION 106.3.1. (NOTE: NO REVISION # 4
 REVISIONS ARE INDICATED ON THE SHEETS).
 ******NO RESPONSE, NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 2B. SHT P-5 INDICATES REVISION #3. REVISION #3 FOUND BY
 THE DIRECTIONAL COMPASS WITH NO CLOUD AND NO APPARENT
 CHANGE/REVISION. PLEASE CLARIFY. SECTION 106.1.1.
 ******NO RESPONSE, NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 3B. SHT P-6 REVISION #4 DATE HAS BEEN CHANGED FROM
 07-06-05 TO 07-24-06. ALSO REVISIONS INDICATED ON
 07-24-06 HAS NOT BEEN FOUND OR APPROVED.--REVISIONS
 5 & 6 FROM SET OF PLANS SIGNED, SEALED & DATED 09-23-05
 HAVE BEEN DELETED FROM THE REVISION INDEX. SINCE THERE
 ARE MANY REVISIONS ATTRIBUTED TO REVISION #6, WHY HAS
 REVISION #6 BEEN DELETED FROM THE REVISION INDEX?--
 NO NEW REVISION NUMBER #7 IS INDICATED ON THE NEW SHT
 P-6. PLEASE CLOUD AND NUMBER NEW REVISIONS AND TURN OFF
 ALL PREVIOUS CLOUDS OF REVISIONS APPROVED PRIOR TO THIS
 REVISION AS YOU HAVE FOR REVISIONS #5 & #6. (REVISIONS
 1, 2, 3 CLOUDS STILL SHOWN ON PLANS).
 ******NO RESPONSE, NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 4B. OK
 5B. OK
 6B. OK
 7B. OK
  
 8B. SHT P-8 REVISION #4 ON THE STAMPED PLANS SIGNED,
 SEALED & DATED 07-06-05 HAS BEEN CHANGED TO 07-24-06.
 SINCE THE REVISIONS #4 HAS ITS OWN REVISION, A NEW
 REVISION NUMBER IS REQUIRED FOR ALL NEW REVISIONS. ALSO
 REVISIONS INDICATED ON 07-24-06 HAS NOT BEEN FOUND OR
 APPROVED.
 ******NO RESPONSE, NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 9B. OK
  
 10B. SHT P-9 GAS SYSTEM #1 PER TABLE 402.4(6) MINIMUM
 SIZE IS 2-1/2". 2" IS SHOWN.--SUBMIT MANUF
 SPECIFICATION SHEETS FOR THE WATER HEATERS TO VERIFY
 COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS NFPA-54, NFPA-58 AND FBC-2004
 FUEL GAS SEC. 402.2.
 ******PIPE SIZES ADDRESSED, BUT MANUF. SPECIFICATION
 SHEETS NOT SUBMITTED.
  
 11B. OK
  
 12B. SHT P-10 REVISION #3 WAS DATED 07-06-05 AND HAS
 NOT BEEN CHANGED TO 07-24-06. THIS REVISION HAS NOT
 BEEN FOUND OR APPROVED. NEW REVISIONS SHALL HAVE NEW
 REVISION NUMBERS. EXISTING REVISIONS SHALL REMAIN AS
 APPROVED FOR CONFORMITY TO RECORD RETENTION.--
 REVISION #4 WAS DATED 09-16-05 AND NOW CHANGED TO DATE
 02-16-07. REVISION HAS NOT BEEN APPROVED. NEW REVISIONS
 SHALL HAVE NEW REVISION NUMBERS. TURN OFF ALL
 PREVIOUSLY APPROVED REVISION CLOUDS AND REVISION
 NUMBERS ON THE PLANS TO HELP EXPEDITE THE REVISION
 REVIEW. LEAVE REVISION INDEX NUMBER HISTORY CURRENT
 FROM FIRST REVISION THRU TO THE NEWEST REVISION.
 ******NO RESPONSE, NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 13B. OK
  
 14B. SHT P-12 GAS WATER HEATERS HAVE CHANGED. SUBMIT
 MANUF. SPECIFICATIONS FOR GAS APPROVAL. SECTION 402.2.
 ******NO RESPONSE, NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 15B. OK
  
 **********NEW COMMENTS**********
  
 1C. SHT P-7 SANT. RISERS S/1A, S/3 & S/7 VENT STACKS
 SHALL CONNECT TO THE BASE OF THE SANT. STACK. SECTION
 903.4.
  
 2C. SHT P-12 SHOWS FRESH AIR VENTS DELETED FOR THE
 WATER HEATERS. PLEASE SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR
 COMBUSTION AIR. ( SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR COMBUSTION
 AIR (IF APPLICABLE) PER FBC-2004 FUEL
 GAS CODE SECTION 304).
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE
 THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY
 PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER
 LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER,
 WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE,
 IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION
 PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND
 WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE
 ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE
 ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE
 COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED.
 THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.
  
 REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS
 (561) 805-6721
 FAX (561) 805-6731
 E-MAIL [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 7 Status F Date 2007-08-25 Cont ID  
Sent By kstevens Date 2007-08-25 Time 17:21 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kstevens Date 2007-08-25 Time 17:21 Sent To  
Notes
2007-08-25 17:31:12REVISION DENIED
 REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING
 FBC-2004 FUEL GAS
 FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1
  
 ****FROM PREVIOUS REVISION REVIEW:
  
  
 1. SHTS P-1, P-4, P-5, P-7, P-8, P-9 & P-10 REVISIONS
 ARE INDICATED AS REVISIONS 1 & 2. REVISIONS 1 & 2 ARE
 ALREADY SUBMITTED. THE NEW REVISIONS NUMBERS SHALL STAY
 IN SEQUENCE ALREADY ESTABLISHED ON THESE PLANS AND, FOR
 EXAMPLE, SHT P-1 HAS REVISIONS 1 THRU 5, SO THE NEXT
 REVISIONS SHALL BE 6 & 7. PLEASE INDICATE THE CORRECT
 REVISION NUMBERS ON EACH REVISED SHEET ACCORDING TO
 PREVIOUS REVISIONS. SECTION 106.1.3.
 ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT P-1 STILL SHOWS A 2ND #2
 REVISION AND NEW REVISION #5 PREVIOUSLY DATED 03-07-05
 ON THE PLANS SIGNED, SEALED, AND DATED 3-11-05 HAS BEEN
 CHANGED TO 07-24-06. PLEASE CLARIFY. COMMENT HAS NOT
 BEEN ADDRESSED. ALSO PLEASE TURN OFF ALL PREVIOUSLY
 APPROVED REVISION CLOUDS AND REVISION NUMBERS ON THE
 PLAN. THIS WILL HELP EXPEDITE FUTURE REVISIONS AND
 ENABLE THE PLAN REVIEWERS TO REVIEW REVISIONS IN A
 TIMELY MANNER.--SHT P-4 REVISION #2 HAD AN ORIGINAL
 REVISION DATE 08-27-04, BUT THE NEW SHT P-4 SHOWS THE
 REVISION DATE 02-25-04 FOR THE SAME REVISION. PLEASE
 CLARIFY.
  
 2. OK
 3. OK
  
 4. SHT P-9 GAS SYSTEM SHOWS THE SERVICE SIZE TO BE
 2-1/2", BUT THE ISOMETRIC SHOWS 2" PIPE. TABLE 402.4(7)
 INDICATES 2-1/2" REQUIRED. ALSO 2" IS REQUIRED TO EACH
 WATER HEATER PER TABLE 402.4(7).PLEASE CORRECT THE
 PIPE SIZING ON THE ISOMETRIC. ALSO INDICATE THE CHANGE
 OF MATERIAL FROM SCHED. 40 TO SEMIRIGID COPPER.
 ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT AS INDICATED, 2-1/2" PIPE IS
 REQUIRED. SEE TABLE 402.4(6).
  
 5. OK
  
 ************NEW COMMENTS************
  
 1B. SHTS P-2 & P-3 REVISION #4 HAS BEEN CHANGED, THE
 ORIGINAL REVISION IS DATED 07-06-05, BUT THE NEW SHTS
 SHOWS REVISION #4 DATED 07-24-06. ALSO REVISIONS
 INDICATED ON 07-24-06 HAS NOT BEEN FOUND OR APPROVED.
 SINCE THERE WAS ALREADY A REVISION #4 SHOWN ON THE
 SIGNED, SEALED SHEETS DATED 07-06-05, ALL REVISIONS
 AFTER THAT DATE SHALL HAVE THEIR OWN REVISION NUMBER.
 THE REVISIONS SHALL BE SEQUENTIAL TO TRACK ALL
 REVISIONS. SECTION 106.3.1. (NOTE: NO REVISION # 4
 REVISIONS ARE INDICATED ON THE SHEETS).
  
 2B. SHT P-5 INDICATES REVISION #3. REVISION #3 FOUND BY
 THE DIRECTIONAL COMPASS WITH NO CLOUD AND NO APPARENT
 CHANGE/REVISION. PLEASE CLARIFY. SECTION 106.1.1.
  
 3B. SHT P-6 REVISION #4 DATE HAS BEEN CHANGED FROM
 07-06-05 TO 07-24-06. ALSO REVISIONS INDICATED ON
 07-24-06 HAS NOT BEEN FOUND OR APPROVED.--REVISIONS
 5 & 6 FROM SET OF PLANS SIGNED, SEALED & DATED 09-23-05
 HAVE BEEN DELETED FROM THE REVISION INDEX. SINCE THERE
 ARE MANY REVISIONS ATTRIBUTED TO REVISION #6, WHY HAS
 REVISION #6 BEEN DELETED FROM THE REVISION INDEX?--
 NO NEW REVISION NUMBER #7 IS INDICATED ON THE NEW SHT
 P-6. PLEASE CLOUD AND NUMBER NEW REVISIONS AND TURN OFF
 ALL PREVIOUS CLOUDS OF REVISIONS APPROVED PRIOR TO THIS
 REVISION AS YOU HAVE FOR REVISIONS #5 & #6. (REVISIONS
 1, 2, 3 CLOUDS STILL SHOWN ON PLANS).
  
 4B. SHT P-7 RISER S/8 DOES NOT REFLECT THE FLOOR PLAN.
 SHT P-5 SHOWS AN ICE MAKER & A FLOOR SINK ON THE FLOOR
 PLAN, BUT THE RISER SHOWS NO FLOOR SINK. PLEASE
 CORRELATE RISER AND FLOOR PLAN INFORMATION. SECTION
 106.1.1.
  
 5B. P-7 RISER S/6 WASTE LINES FOR TUBS TO BE CONNECTED
 TO THE STACK BELOW THE FLOOR UNLESS THE TUBS ARE TO BE
 RAISED ABOVE THE FLOOR LEVEL. PLEASE CLARIFY. SECTION
 106.1.1.
  
 6B. SHT P-7 WATER RISER DIAGRAMS FOR MEN & WOMEN TOILET
 ROOMS: SHUT OFF VALVES ARE REQUIRED FOR THE W/H'S PER
 SECTION 606.2(2). PLEASE INDICATE ON RISER.
  
 7B. SHT P-7 WATER PIPING ISOMETRICS FOR UNITS 100, 101,
 102, 104, 105, 106 & 108 HAVE A REVISION #4. NO CHANGE
 IS NOTED. PLEASE CLARIFY. SECTION 106.1.1.
  
 8B. SHT P-8 REVISION #4 ON THE STAMPED PLANS SIGNED,
 SEALED & DATED 07-06-05 HAS BEEN CHANGED TO 07-24-06.
 SINCE THE REVISIONS #4 HAS ITS OWN REVISION, A NEW
 REVISION NUMBER IS REQUIRED FOR ALL NEW REVISIONS. ALSO
 REVISIONS INDICATED ON 07-24-06 HAS NOT BEEN FOUND OR
 APPROVED.
  
 9B. SHT P-9 REVISION #4 NOT FOUND OR APPROVED.
  
 10B. SHT P-9 GAS SYSTEM #1 PER TABLE 402.4(6) MINIMUM
 SIZE IS 2-1/2". 2" IS SHOWN.--SUBMIT MANUF
 SPECIFICATION SHEETS FOR THE WATER HEATERS TO VERIFY
 COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS NFPA-54, NFPA-58 AND FBC-2004
 FUEL GAS SEC. 402.2.
  
 11B. SHT P-9 LOBBY REST-ROOMS WATER ISOMETRIC RISER
 DIAGRAM IS A REVISION & SHALL BE INDICATED AS SUCH WITH
 A CLOUD & A REVISION NUMBER ASSIGNED TO IT. SECTION
 106.1.3.
  
 12B. SHT P-10 REVISION #3 WAS DATED 07-06-05 AND HAS
 NOT BEEN CHANGED TO 07-24-06. THIS REVISION HAS NOT
 BEEN FOUND OR APPROVED. NEW REVISIONS SHALL HAVE NEW
 REVISION NUMBERS. EXISTING REVISIONS SHALL REMAIN AS
 APPROVED FOR CONFORMITY TO RECORD RETENTION.--
 REVISION #4 WAS DATED 09-16-05 AND NOW CHANGED TO DATE
 02-16-07. REVISION HAS NOT BEEN APPROVED. NEW REVISIONS
 SHALL HAVE NEW REVISION NUMBERS. TURN OFF ALL
 PREVIOUSLY APPROVED REVISION CLOUDS AND REVISION
 NUMBERS ON THE PLANS TO HELP EXPEDITE THE REVISION
 REVIEW. LEAVE REVISION INDEX NUMBER HISTORY CURRENT
 FROM FIRST REVISION THRU TO THE NEWEST REVISION.
  
 13B. SHT P-11 CONDENSATE DRAIN PIPING ISOMETRIC RISER
 DIAGRAM RISER C/1 SHOWS 2" RISER DRAINING INTO 1-1/2"
 BRANCH LINE. THIS IS NOT APPROVED PER SECTION 704.2.
 PLEASE CORRECT RISER DIAGRAM.
  
 14B. SHT P-12 GAS WATER HEATERS HAVE CHANGED. SUBMIT
 MANUF. SPECIFICATIONS FOR GAS APPROVAL. SECTION 402.2.
  
 15B. GENERAL NOTE: ALL SHEETS, TURN OFF ALL PREVIOUS
 REVISION CLOUDS & NUMBERED TRIANGLES THAT HAVE BEEN
 PREVIOUSLY APPROVED FROM THE FLOOR PLAN, ISOMETRICS
 ETC. LEAVING THESE ON CREATS CONFUSION AND ADDS TO THE
 PLAN REVIEW TIME AND TURN AROUND. LEAVE THE REVISION
 INDEX NUMBERS AND REVISION DATES AS APPROVED AND NEW
 REVISION NUMBERS SHALL BE ADDED FOR NEW REVISIONS
 WITHOUT DUPLICATING THE REVISIONS NUMBERS. SECTION
 106.1.3.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE
 THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY
 PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER
 LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER,
 WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION
 MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION
 PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND
 WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE ALL VOID
 SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY
 ON TOP OF THE COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. THANK YOU
 FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.
  
 REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS
 (561) 805-6721
 FAX (561) 805-6731
 E-MAIL [email protected]
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 6 Status F Date 2007-05-17 Cont ID  
Sent By kstevens Date 2007-05-17 Time 07:41 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kstevens Date 2007-05-14 Time 16:57 Sent To  
Notes
2007-05-17 08:02:51REVISION DENIED
 REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING
 FBC-2004 FUEL GAS
 FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1
  
  
 1. SHTS P-1, P-4, P-5, P-7, P-8, P-9 & P-10 REVISIONS
 ARE INDICATED AS REVISIONS 1 & 2. REVISIONS 1 & 2 ARE
 ALREADY SUBMITTED. THE NEW REVISIONS NUMBERS SHALL STAY
 IN SEQUENCE ALREADY ESTABLISHED ON THESE PLANS AND, FOR
 EXAMPLE, SHT P-1 HAS REVISIONS 1 THRU 5, SO THE NEXT
 REVISIONS SHALL BE 6 & 7. PLEASE INDICATE THE CORRECT
 REVISION NUMBERS ON EACH REVISED SHEET ACCORDING TO
 PREVIOUS REVISIONS. SECTION 106.1.3.
  
 2. SHTS P-1 & P-5, (NEW) REVISION 1 NOT FOUND.
  
 3. SHT P-8 DRAINAGE PIPING SHALL NOT BE REDUCED IN THE
 DIRECTION OF FLOW PER SECTION 704.2. SEE RISER "F"
 SHOWS 4" ON THE HORIZONTAL & 3" AT THE TOP OF THE RISER
 ON THE VERTICAL. PLEASE CORRELATE PIPE SIZES.
  
 4. SHT P-9 GAS SYSTEM SHOWS THE SERVICE SIZE TO BE
 2-1/2", BUT THE ISOMETRIC SHOWS 2" PIPE. TABLE 402.4(7)
 INDICATES 2-1/2" REQUIRED. ALSO 2" IS REQUIRED TO EACH
 WATER HEATER PER TABLE 402.4(7).PLEASE CORRECT THE
 PIPE SIZING ON THE ISOMETRIC. ALSO INDICATE THE CHANGE
 OF MATERIAL FROM SCHED. 40 TO SEMIRIGID COPPER.
  
 5. SHT P-9 WATER RISER DIAGRAM SHOWS THE 8TH FLOOR
 BETWEEN THE 4TH & 5TH FLOORS. ALSO SHOWN IS 3/4" WATER
 SUPPLY TO THE 5TH FLOOR AND 1" FROM THE 4TH FLOOR UP TO
 THE 8TH FLOOR. THE WATER RISER DIAGRAM SHALL REFLECT
 WHAT WILL BE INSTALLED. IF SOME FLOORS ARE TYPICAL FOR
 PIPE SIZES, (EXAMPLE 2ND THRU 4TH FLOORS 2 INCH PIPE),
 THAT CAN BE INDICATED ON THE RISER. PLEASE SUBMIT
 CALCULATIONS FOR THE WATER PIPING PER SECTION 604.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE
 THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY
 PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER
 LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER,
 WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION
 MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION
 PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND
 WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE ALL VOID
 SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY
 ON TOP OF THE COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. THANK YOU
 FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.
  
 REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS
 (561) 805-6721
 FAX (561) 805-6731
 E-MAIL [email protected]
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 5 Status F Date 2006-10-06 Cont ID  
Sent By kstevens Date 2006-10-06 Time 07:52 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kstevens Date 2006-10-06 Time 07:52 Sent To  
Notes
2006-10-06 00:00:00REVISION DENIED
 REFERENCE: FBC-2001 PLUMBING
 FBC-2001 CHAPTER 1
  
  
 1. REVISIONS SHALL BE CLOUDED AND
 REVISION NUMBER SHALL BE SHOWN AT THE
 REVISION. WITH THE WORK LOAD WE HAVE I
 CAN NOT SPEND TIME SEARCHING ALL SYSTEMS
 ON ALL SHEETS WHEN THERE ARE ONLY
 CHANGES TO SMALL PORTIONS OF THE SHEETS.
 SECTION 104.2.1.3 (SEE HIGHLIGHTED AREAS
 OF SHEETS P-1 & P-2 ON ONE SET FOR
 EXAMPLE).
  
 REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS
 (561) 805-6721
 FAX (561) 805-6731
 E-MAIL [email protected]
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2005-09-27 Cont ID  
Sent By pschmitz Date 2005-09-27 Time 15:03 Rev Time 0.00
Received By pschmitz Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2005-09-27 00:00:00 
 9-27-05PES
 REVISOINS FOR PREVIOUS NOTES.
 ROOF DRAINS AND O/F.
 ALSO WATER HEATER NOTE.
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2005-10-04 Cont ID  
Sent By kstevens Date 2005-10-04 Time 08:38 Rev Time 0.56
Received By kstevens Date 2005-08-22 Time 17:40 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2005-08-06 Cont ID  
Sent By kstevens Date 2005-08-06 Time 12:07 Rev Time 6.50
Received By kstevens Date 2005-08-05 Time 18:31 Sent To  
Notes
2005-08-06 00:00:00DENIED
 REFERENCE: FBC-2001 PLUMBING
  
 FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW:
  
 1. CALCULATIONS FOR PRIMARY AND
 SECONDARY ROOF DRAINS. SHEET P-6
 INDICATES SIZE OF SECONDARY ROOF DRAINS
 REQUIRED AS 18 SQ. IN., BUT MINIMUM 22
 SQ. IN. REQUIRED PER SECTION 1107 AND
 TABLE 1106.3 IN MOST SECTIONS. A MINIMUM
 OF 36 SQ.IN. IS REQUIRED IN SECTIONS 6
 AND 7. - PLEASE RECHECK ALL AREAS AS
 SOME AREAS SHOW NO VERTICAL AREAS OR
 UPPER ROOF AREAS AND THEY ARE NEXT TO
 PARAPET WALLS, BELVEDERE WALLS & ROOFS,
 SPA EQUIPMENT OR RESTROOM WALLS,
 STAIRWAY WALLS ECT. SHOW ALL WALLS AND
 ROOF AREAS THAT DRAIN ONTO ROOFS IN
 CALCULATIONS. (SEE CALCULATIONS ATTACHED
 FOR AREAS 1 & 2) - SCUPPER SIZES
 INDICATED ON SHT P-6 CALCULATIONS STATE
 6"X1.5". THE BUILDING ELEVATIONS
 INDICATE THAT THE SCUPPERS WILL BE
 CYLINDRICAL AND IF SO PLEASE INDICATE
 WHAT THE 1.5" MEASUREMENT IS REFERING
 TO.
 8. SHT P-12 WATER HEATER DETAIL. NO T&P
 LINES SHOWN ON THE WATER HEATERS.
 SECTION 504.5 - BOTTOM FED WATER HEATERS
 AND STORAGE TANK SHALL HAVE A VACUUM
 RELIEF VALVE INSTALLED AT THE HIGHEST
 POINT OF THE WATER INLET. SECTION 504.2
 WATER HEATERS SHALL BE PIPED ACCORDING
 TO MANUFACTURES INSTALLATION
 INSTRUCTIONS. SECTION 502.1.
  
 REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS
 (561) 805-6721
 FAX (561) 653-2692
 E-MAIL [email protected]
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2005-04-22 Cont ID  
Sent By kstevens Date 2005-04-22 Time 18:08 Rev Time 8.25
Received By kstevens Date 2005-04-22 Time 18:08 Sent To  
Notes
2005-04-22 00:00:00DENIED
 REFERENCE: FBC-2001 PLUMBING
 FBC-2001 FUEL GAS
 FBC-2001 CHAPTER 1
  
 1) SHTS A-108, A-109, & P-6 SUBMIT
 CALCULATIONS FOR PRIMARY AND SECONDARY
 ROOF DRAINS PER SECTIONS 1106 & 1107 AND
 ALL SUBSECTIONS. SHOW TOTAL SQUARE
 FOOTAGE FOR EACH AREA BEING DRAINED.
 SHOW 1/2 AREA OF ALL VERTICAL WALLS
 INCLUDING PARAPETS, AND AREAS OF ROOF
 THAT DRAIN ONTO THE DIFFERENT AREAS
 ADDED TO ROOF AREA IN CALCULATIONS. SHOW
 THE LOCATION OF ALL SECONDARY ROOF
 DRAINS INCLUDING AREAS THAT ARE NOT
 ADJACENT TO THE OUTER WALLS.
 2) SHTS A-103 & P-2. SHT A-103 SHOWS A
 STORAGE ROOM, BUT P-2 SHOWS A LAUNDRY -
 WATER HEATER ROOM. PLEASE CLARIFY.
 SECTION 104.2.1.
 3) SHTS P-1 & P-2. SHT P-1 SHOWS SANT.
 RISER #11 UP TO MEZZ. LEVEL, BUT DOES NT
 SHOW UP ON P-2. PLEASE CORRELATE PLANS.
 SECTION 104.2.1.
 4) SHT P-6 AREAS AROUND THE ENDS OF THE
 SPA, WHERE THE SPA HAS BEE REDUCED IN
 SIZE, SHALL BE INCREASED TO REFLECT THE
 LARGER AREAS TO BE DRAINED. SECTION
 104.2.1.
 5) SHT P-7 SHOWS WATER PIPING TO GROUND
 FLOOR LAUNDRY, BUT THIS HAS BEEN DELETED
 ON THE FLOOR PLAN. PLEASE DELETE WATER
 DETAIL FOR GROUND FLOOR LAUNDRY. SECTION
 104.2.1.
 6) SHT P-7 SANITARY RISER S/8 AND BRANCH
 LINE TO RISER ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE BLDG.
 DRAIN ISOMETRIC. SECTION 104.2.1.
 8) SHT P-12 WATER HEATER DETAIL. T&P
 RELIEF VALVE DISCHARGE LINES SHOW VALVES
  
 AND ARE TIED TOGETHER AND VALVED PRIOR
 TO ENTERING THE STORAGE TANK. THIS IS
 NOT APPROVED PER SECTIONS 504.5.1 AND
 504.7.1. - ALSO THE STORAGE TANK SHOWS
 NO DISCHARGE PIPING. SHOW THE
 TERMINATION POINT FOR RELIEF VALVES.-
 BOTTOM FED WATER HEATERS AND STORAGE
 TANKS SHALL HAVE A VACUUM RELIEF VALVE
 INSTALLED. SECTION 504.2.-WATER
 HEATER SHOW NO HOT WATER LINES EXITING
 THE HEATERS. - WATER HEATERS SHALL BE
 PIPED IN SUCH AN ARRANGEMENT TO SUPPLY
 AND DISCHARGE SIMULTANEOUSLY FROM EACH
 WATER HEATER.
 9. SUBMIT MANUFACTURE SHEETS FOR ALL GAS
 EQUIPMENT TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH
 STANDARDS NFPA 54, NFPA 58, AND THE
 FBC-2001 FUEL GAS CODE SEC 402.2
  
 REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS
 (561) 805-6721
 FAX (561) 653-2692
 E-MAIL [email protected]
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 8 Status P Date 2008-04-25 Cont ID  
Sent By mflis Date 2008-04-25 Time 09:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mflis Date 2008-04-25 Time 09:18 Sent To  
Notes
2008-04-25 09:28:59ZONING REVIEW: PASSED
  
 MATT FLIS - 822-1445
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 7 Status P Date 2008-01-22 Cont ID  
Sent By mflis Date 2008-01-22 Time 14:06 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mflis Date 2008-01-22 Time 11:34 Sent To  
Notes
2008-01-22 14:10:09ZONING REVIEW: PASSED WITH PROVISO.
  
 PROVISO NOTES SHALL BE ADDRESSED UPON RESUBMITTAL OR
 REVISION OF DRAWINGS:
  
 1) ON REVISED LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS, PLEASE INDICATE
 STREET TREES ALONG FERN LOCATED AT 30' O.C.. THIS WILL
 YIELD APPROXIMATELY THREE TREES. SPECIES TO BE
 HIGH-RISE LIVE OAK IN 5'X5' TREE GRATES AGAINST CURB.
 SEE CITY FOR TYPICAL MODEL.
 2) ON LANDCAPE DRAWINGS, PLEASE INDCIATE THAT
 ORNAMENTAL POTS ON ROOF TOP SHALL BE ANCHORED AS TO BE
 PERMANENT.
 3) SCREENING MATERIAL FOR MECHANICAL PARKING TO BE
 REVIEWED AND APPROVED WHEN SUBMITTED.
 4) NO ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT INDICATED ON
 EAST AND WEST ELEVATION. PLEASE CONSIDER ADDITION SOME
 ADDITIONAL DETAILS OR SCORING TO IMPROVE DESIGN.
  
 MATT FLIS - 822-1445
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 6 Status F Date 2007-08-06 Cont ID  
Sent By mflis Date 2007-08-06 Time 14:01 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mflis Date 2007-08-06 Time 14:01 Sent To  
Notes
2007-08-06 14:29:19ZONING REVIEW: FAILED
  
 OLD COMMENTS UNADDRESSED:
  
 1) PARKING STRUCTURE SHALL BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THE
 BUILDING PERMIT SET.
 2) ACCESS DRIVES TO PARKING SHALL BE AMINIMUM OF 11
 FEET IN WIDTH. PLANS SHOW 9'-0" CLEAR AT ENDS OF DRIVES
 - THIS WILL NOT BE WIDE ENOUGH FOR VEHICULAR PASSAGE.
 3) MECHANICAL PARKING INDICATED ON NORTH SIDE OF
 PARKING AREA WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE DAC APPROVAL.
 PLEASE REMOVE THIS MECHANICAL PARKING.
 4) FOR THE PARKING SCREENING, PLEASE PROVIDE A KICK
 PLATE AT THE BOTTOM AND SEPARATE GRILLE/MESH MATERIAL
 AT LEAST 8 INCHES FROM THE COLUMN AND KICK PLATE. NO
 SECTION DETAIL IS PROVIDED IN THIS SET TO VERIFY.
 5) PLEASE PROVIDE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS TO CONFIRM
 APPROPRIATE SCREENING FOR MECHANICAL PARKING. 5'-0"
 LANDSCAPE BUFFER NEEDED ON SIDE AND REAR FOR PLANT
 MATERIALS.
  
 NEW COMMENTS:
  
 1) PLEASE UPDATE COVER SHEET TO REFLECT CURRENT
 REVISION DATE.
 2) PLEASE PROVIDE GROUND FLOOR LANDSCAPE PLAN
 INDICATING STREET TREES, AND LANDSCAPING AT REAR
 ADJACENT TO PARKING SCREENING. PLEASE REFER TO DAC
 MINUTES FOR BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS.
 3) PROVIDE A TABLE INDICATING COMPLIANCE WITH ROOFTOP
 TERRACE REQUIREMENTS - IE LANDSCAPE COVERAGE AND
 BUILDING COVERAGE. REFER TO ART IV SECTION 94-108
 (B)(5).
 4) A-101 - INDICATE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM ADA PARKING.
 "LANDCAPE AREA" NOTE SEEMS TO BE IN WRONG LOCATION AND
 BLOCK SIDEWALK ACCESS.
 5) MEZZANINE AREA SHALL NOT EXCEED BUILDING CODE
 ALLOWANCE. PLEASE CONFIRM.
 6) A-203 - EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS REQUIRE ADDITIONAL
 ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT. PLEASE ADD BANDS, APPLIED
 CORNICE, ETC TO BREAK UP BLANK FACADE. CONTACT STAFF
 FOR ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS.
  
 MATT FLIS - 822-1445
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 5 Status F Date 2007-05-10 Cont ID  
Sent By mflis Date 2007-05-10 Time 14:44 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mflis Date 2007-05-10 Time 14:44 Sent To  
Notes
2007-05-10 14:46:08ZONING REVIEW: FAILED
  
 - THIS DRAWING SET IS NOT REVIEWABLE AT THIS TIME; MANY
 MISSING DRAWINGS AND/OR DRAWINGS WHICH ARE NOT UPDATED
 TO REFLECT CHANGE FROM FIVE-STORY TO EIGHT-STORY
 BUILDING
 - PLANS MISSING UPDATED SECTIONS, ELEVATIONS, ETC
 - PLEASE SUBMIT MATERIALS FOR PARKING SYSTEM AND
 INDICATE COMPLIANCE WITH ALL CONDITIONS AS APPROVED BY
 THE DOWNTOWN ACTION COMMITTEE
 - A TDR CERTIFICATE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH BUILDING
 PERMIT FOR ADDITIONAL FLOORS (6 THROUGH 8)
 - PLEASE REVIEW ALL PREVIOUS COMMENTS FROM PLANNING
 REGARDING THIS PERMIT; NEW COMMENTS WILL BE PROVIDED
 WITH SUBMITTAL OF COMPLETE SET
  
 MATT FLIS - 822-1445
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2006-09-28 Cont ID  
Sent By aaponte Date 2006-09-28 Time 08:53 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aaponte Date 2006-09-28 Time 08:53 Sent To  
Notes
2006-09-28 00:00:00PERMIT FOR THE 8 STORY BUILDING
 1. PARKING STRUCTURE SHAL BE INCLUDED AS
 PART OF THE BUILDING PERMIT SET.
 2. ACCESS DRIVES TO PARKING SHALL BE A
 MINIMUM ON 11 FEET IN WIDTH.
 3. REQUIRED HANDICAP SPACES FOR THIS
 PROJECT IS ONLY 4 SPACES.
 4. LANDSCAPE STRIP ALONG SIDE PROPERTY
 LINE SHALL BE MINIMUM FIVE FEET IN
 WIDTH.
 5. MECHANICAL PARKING ELEVATORS ON THE
 NORTH SIDE OF PARKING AREA WERE NOT
 INLCUDED ON DAC APPOVAL FOR
 PARKING.PLEASE PLEASE REPLACE MECHANICAL
 SPACES FOR REGULAR PARKING SPACES.
 6. FOR THE PARKING SCREEN, PLEASE
 PROVIDE A KICK PLATE AT THE BOTTOM AND
 SEPARATE THE GRILL AT LEAST 8 INCHES
 FROM THE COLUMN AND THE KICK PLATE.
 7. PLEASE PROVIDE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS TO
 CONFIRM CODE COMPLIANCE.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2006-08-29 Cont ID  
Sent By aaponte Date 2006-08-29 Time 11:44 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aaponte Date 2006-08-29 Time 11:44 Sent To  
Notes
2006-08-29 00:00:00FOUNDATION ONLY.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2005-09-01 Cont ID  
Sent By aaponte Date 2005-09-01 Time 14:12 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aaponte Date 2005-09-01 Time 14:12 Sent To  
Notes
2005-09-01 00:00:00PROVISO: STREET TREES SHALL BE PLANTED
 IN FRONT OF THE BUILDING ACCORDING TO
 ARTICLE IV SECTION 94-108 (G) BEFORE CO.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2006-10-26 Cont ID  
Sent By aaponte Date 2005-04-29 Time 15:13 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aaponte Date 2005-04-29 Time 15:13 Sent To  
Notes
2005-04-29 00:00:001. PLEASE PROVIDE LANDSCAPE DRAWING FOR
 THE ROOFTOP TERRACE TO CONFIRM
 COMPLIANCE WITH THE REGULATION.
 2. PLEASE EXPLORE ALTERNATIVES TO COVER
 THE METAL GRILL ON THE FRONT ELEVATION.


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved