Plan Review Details - Permit 04050133
Plan Review Stops For Permit 04050133
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2004-07-20 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2004-07-20 Time 11:16 Rev Time 0.50
Received By shill Date 2004-07-20 Time 11:16 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2004-07-16 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2004-07-16 Time 09:07 Rev Time 0.50
Received By shill Date 2004-07-16 Time 09:07 Sent To  
Notes
2004-07-16 00:00:00****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
  
 1.)THE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR SERIES
 69 IS MISSING FROM THE SUBMITTAL.
 PROVIDE A PRODUCT APPROVAL REVIEWED
 BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD.
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2004-07-06 Cont ID  
Sent By csiegber Date 2004-07-16 Time 08:47 Rev Time 1.00
Received By shill Date 2004-07-06 Time 16:01 Sent To  
Notes
2004-07-06 00:00:00****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
  
 1.)PROVIDE A THIRD COPY OF THE SITE
 SPECIFIC PRODUCT APPROVALS.
  
 2.)HAVE THE SITE SPECIFIC PRODUCT
 APPROVALS SIGNED BY THE DESIGNER OF
 RECORD IN BOX 10.
  
 3.)AS THE PRIMARY PERMIT FOR THE
 BUILDING WAS APPLIED FOR PRIOR TO
 10/1/03, RULE 9B-72 DOES NOT APPLY.
 DISREGARD THE PREVIOUS COMMENTS BUT BE
 ADVISED THAT COMPLIANCE WILL BE
 REQUIRED ON ANY FUTURE PROJECTS WITH
 A PERMIT APPLICATION DATE AFTER 10/1/03.
  
 4.)IN THE FUTURE, ANY NEW SHEETS ARE
 TO BE INSERTED INTO THE PLANS WITH THE
 OLD SHEETS SUBMITTED SEPARATELY.
  
 ****NO RESUB FEE****
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2004-05-13 Cont ID  
Sent By csiegber Date 2004-06-30 Time 09:56 Rev Time 5.00
Received By shill Date 2004-05-12 Time 12:18 Sent To  
Notes
2004-05-12 00:00:00****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
  
 1.)FLORIDA STATE, LOCAL OR SITE
 SPECIFIC PRODUCT APPROVALS REQUIRED
 RULE 9B-72.SEE WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG
 (PRODUCT APPROVAL) FOR MORE INFORMATION.
 ALSO SEE ATTACHED RULE.
  
 2.)FOR THE PRODUCTS WITH A DADE COUNTY
 NOA, PRINT THE FLORIDA STATE PRODUCT
 APPROVAL FROM THE WEBSITE, IF
 AVAILABLE.
  
 3.)FOR THE PRODUCTS WITH A DADE COUNTY
 NOA AND NOT LISTED ON THE STATE
 WEBSITE AS HAVING A STATE PRODUCT APP.,
 PLEASE COMPLETE AN APPLICATION FOR
 LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL, ATTACHED.
 COMPLETE ONE FOR EACH PRODUCT.SUBMIT
 TWO COPIES.
  
 4.)FOR THE PRODUCTS WITHOUT AN NOA,
 COMPLETE THE APPLICATION FOR LOCAL
 PRODUCT APPROVAL.SEE THE ATTACHED
 VALIDATION CHECKLIST FOR LOCAL PRODUCT
 APPROVAL TO ASSIST YOU IN PROPERLY
 FILLING OUT THE FORM TO AVOID DELAYS.
  
 5.)THE ONE-TIME PRODUCT APPROVALS FROM
 MIAMI-DADE WILL BE FOR REFERENCE ONLY,
 NOT FOR APPROVAL.
  
 6.)AS THE ANCHORING IS NOT THE SAME
 AS WAS TESTED, THE ANCHORING OF THE
 PRODUCT IS TO BE INSPECTED AND CERTIFIED
 AND AN INSPECTION LETTER INDICATING
 COMPLIANCE IS TO BE SUBMITTED FROM A
 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER.THIS APPLIES ONLY
 TO PRODUCTS NOT INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE
 WITH THE NOA OR TEST REPORT.SUBMIT
 A SEALED LETTER INDICATING AGREEMENT.
  
 7.)AS YOU DO NOT HAVE AN APPROVED
 THIRD PARTY QUALITY ASSURANCE ENTITY,
 ADDRESS HOW QUALITY ASSURANCE FOR THE
 MANUFACTURING WILL BE ADDRESSED AS PER
 RULE 9B-72.
  
 8.)A GENERAL COMMENT REGARDING ALL
 OF THE GAMMA USA TEST REPORTS:THE
 REPORT IS VALID ONLY FOR THE SIZE
 TESTED.EXTRAPOLATION IS NOT INDICATED
 IS AN OPTION ON THE TEST REPORT. THE
 REPORT IS VALID ONLY FOR THE EXACT
 PRODUCT TESTED.TWO PRODUCTS MAY BE
 JOINED WITH A MULLION PROVIDED THAT A
 MULLION PRODUCT APPROVAL IS SUBMITTED
 AS WELL.
  
 9.)DOOR TYPES SF9 AND SF10, SHEET 3.01
 ARE NOT MARKED.
  
 10.) DOORS SF9, SF10, SF11 REFER TO TEST
 #61 FOR THE WINDOW WALLS.TEST #61 IS
 FOR A WINDOW WALL SYSTEM WITH LOUVERS,
 RECTANGULAR WINDOWS.THE ELEVATIONS
 ARE FOR ARCHED WINDOWS, NO LOUVERS.
 IS THIS THE CORRECT REPORT OR ARE THE
 ELEVATIONS INCORRECT?SEE SHEET 3.01.
 THIS COMMENT APPLIES ALSO TO THE WINDOWS
 SHOWN ON SHEET 3.00.
  
 11.) SF9, SF10, SF11 REFER TO TEST #69
 FOR OPERABLE WINDOWS.THE TEST REPORT
 IS MISSING, ONLY UNSEALED DRAWINGS ARE
 IN THE BINDER.
  
 12.)SHEET .02 DOES NOT INDICATE THE
 WINDOW OR DOOR TYPES FOR THE OPENINGS.
  
 13.)THE WIND TUNNEL TESTING ELEVATIONS
 SHOW ONE NUMBER FOR PRESSURES, IMPLYING
 THE SAME NUMBER FOR BOTH POSITIVE AND
 NEGATIVE PRESSURE.HOW HAVE YOU ARRIVED
 AT A REDUCED POSITIVE PRESSURE IN SOME
 OF THE AREAS?
  
 14.)TEST 50.4 WINDOW WALL IS
 INCOMPLETE; SHOULD BE A TOTAL OF 5
 PAGES.THIS REPORT IS VALID ONLY FOR
 RECTANGULAR WINDOWS IN THE SIZE TESTED.
  
 15.)SHEET 6.01, TYPE D3W, THE SIZE
 CONFLICTS WITH THE TEST REPORT
 REFERENCED.ALSO, THE TEST REPORT IS
 FORA WINDOW WALL SYSTEM WITH A 175
 DEGREE MULLION.THE UNIT ON THE PLAN
 SHOWS A SGD, 135 DEGREE MULLION AND
 A FIXED GLASS PANEL.
  
 16.)SOME SPEC SHEETS ARE IN FRENCH.
 PLEASE PROVIDE ALL PRODUCT INFORMATION
 IN ENGLISH.
  
 17.)SHEET 6.00, W5 REFERS TO TEST
 #50.2 WHICH IS FOR A WALL SYSTEM WITH
 A 175 DEGREE MULLION.CONFLICTS WITH
 WINDOW DETAIL SHOWN.ALSO CONFLICTS IN
 SIZE.
  
 18.)SHEET 6.01, D1-1W REFERS TO TEST
 50.4, WHICH IS A WALL SYSTEM WITH A
 175 DEGREE MULLION, CONFLICTS WITH
 WINDOW DETAIL.
  
 19.)TEST 55.2 HAS AN INCOMPLETE
 PRODUCT DESCRIPTION, ENDS WITH "171
 DEGREE".THE PRODUCT DESCRIPTION DOES
 NOT MATCH THE WINDOW SHOWN ON 6.00,
 TYPE W6-1.
  
 20.)BEHIND TEST 55.2 ARE MANY SPEC
 SHEETS INCLUDING VINYL WINDOWS, CASEMENT
 WINDOW OPERATORS, SKYLIGHT OPERATORS.
 PLEASE REMOVE ANY SHEETS NOT PERTINENT
 TO THIS SPECIFIC JOB.
  
 21.)SHEET 7.00, THE WINDOW SIZES
 SHOWN CONFLICTS WITH THE TEST REPORT 65.
  
 22.)THE ONE-TIME DADE COUNTY NOA
 SUBMITTED WITH THE TEST 50.4 IS FOR
 TEST 50.2.
  
 23.)SHEET 8 REFERS TO TEST 50.4 FOR
 FIXED WINDOW WALLS.THE DETAILS
 CONFLICT WITH THE TEST REPORT.
  
 24.)THE TEST REPORTS REVIEWED FOR
 YOUR PROJECT WERE BROUGHT IN AS A
 SUBMITTAL FROM SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION.
 THE BINDERS HAVE BEEN RETURNED TO
 SUFFOLK.PLEASE SUBMIT TEST REPORTS
 TO BE A PART OF THIS PERMIT APPLICATION.
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2004-07-16 Cont ID  
Sent By csiegber Date 2004-07-16 Time 08:46 Rev Time 0.00
Received By csiegber Date 2004-07-16 Time 08:46 Sent To B
Notes
2004-07-16 00:00:00TO SH DESK/RESUB
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2004-06-30 Cont ID  
Sent By csiegber Date 2004-06-30 Time 09:56 Rev Time 0.00
Received By csiegber Date 2004-06-30 Time 09:56 Sent To B
Notes
2004-06-30 00:00:00TO SH DESK/RESUB
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2004-05-13 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2004-05-13 Time 12:47 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2004-05-06 Time 12:40 Sent To  
Notes
2004-05-06 00:00:00TO SH DESK


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved