Plan Review Details - Permit 02050779
Plan Review Stops For Permit 02050779
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2002-06-04 Cont ID  
Sent By dpalmer Date 2002-06-04 Time 05:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By dpalmer Date 2002-06-04 Time 05:48 Sent To M
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2002-06-04 Cont ID  
Sent By dpalmer Date 2002-06-04 Time 05:48 Rev Time 0.40
Received By pkrauss Date 2002-06-04 Time 12:35 Sent To R
Notes
2002-06-04 00:00:00PROVISO:MECHANICAL PERMIT 02050834
  
 CONDENSATE SHALL DISCHARGE A MINIMUM OF
 12" AWAY FROM THE BUILDING STRUCTURE AS
 PER 2001 FBC 1503.4.4.
  
 OVERFLOW PROTECTION REQUIRED AS PER 2001
 FBC(M) 307.2.4.
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE
 CONTACT PATTY KRAUSS AT 659-8096
 EXT. 8388.
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2002-05-25 Cont ID  
Sent By kstevens Date 2002-05-25 Time 09:32 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kstevens Date 2002-05-25 Time 09:32 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop R ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2002-08-08 Cont ID  
Sent By hpiskura Date 2002-08-08 Time 08:37 Rev Time 0.00
Received By hpiskura Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2002-08-08 00:00:00THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS
 ARE NOT NEARLY COMPLETE AND DO NOT
 ADDRESS THE LOADS FROM THE ROOF
 DIAPHRAGM AS REQUESTED.
  
 THE LETTER AND CLACULATIONS PREPARED BY
 C.T. TARNOWSKI, PE ARE NOT SIGNED AND
 SEALED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC 104.2.2.
  
 THE TARNOWSKI CALCULATIONS STATE THE
 DESIGN IS TO FBC 1606.2.ONE PAGE
 INVESTIGATES THE WIND MOMENT ON A
 SINGLE FILLED CELL FOR THE 8' WALL
 HEIGHT, BUT IS ABSENT THE CONTRIBUTION
 FROM THE ROOF.SEE FBC 1606.2.4 FOR
 THE MWFRS.
  
 SEE ALSO, FBC 1606.2.2.2 WITH REGARDS
 TO THE ROOF TRUSSES.
  
 THE MASONRY COLUMN SCHEDULE ATTACHED TO
 THE CALCULATIONS, IS THIS INTENDED TO BE
 APPLIED TO THE SHEAR WALLS?
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR AT
 LEAST THE FRONT OF THE HOUSE, INCLUDE
 THE CONNECTIONS TO BE USED.SEE FBC
 2310.1.3.
  
 THE SHEET TITLED "MASONRY WALL BOND
 BEAM ANALYSIS".PLEASE DECLARE WHAT
 THE PRESSURES ARE AND WHETHER THEY ARE
 MWFRS OR C&C.
  
 SHEET S1 STILL CALLS OUT A CAST CRETE
 8F22-1B FOR LINTEL "L17" THAT IS NOT
 DESCRIBED IN THE TABLES ON SHEET S2.IF
 THIS IS A SPECIALTY DESIGN PROVIDE A
 CONSTRUCTION DETAIL.
  
 SHEET S2 SHOWS A PARTIALLY BLOCKED ROOF
 DIAPHRAGM AT THE CENTER FRONT OF THE
 HOUSE.HOW AND WHAT MAGNITUDE OF FORCE
 IS CARRIED TO THE SIDEWALLS? (BOUNDARY)
 SEE FBC 2310.2.ALSO, DIAPHRAGM
 SCHEDULE CALLS OUT 8D NAILS AND 19/32
 RATED SHEATHING.FBC TABLE 2310.2A HAS
 VALUES FOR 8D AND 15/32 SHEATHING. THE
 19/32 SHEATHING IS LISTED THEREIN WITH
 10D NAILS.WHAT WAS USED IN THIS
 DESIGN?
  
 SECTION 1/A3 DOES NOT APPEAR TO AGREE
 WITH PLAN VIEW ON SHEET A/1.PLEASE
 CLARIFY.
  
 THE SOFFIT VENT CALCULATIONS ON SHEET
 A-2 SEEMS TO BE MISSING SOMETHING IN
 THE EQUATION.
  
 SECTION 4/A4 AS TAKEN FROM SHEET A-2,
 IMPLIES A MASONRY RAKE WALL TO THE
 GABLED ROOF.THIS DOES NOT AGREE WITH
 THE FOUNDATION PLAN ON S1.
  
 MIAMI DADE NOA 01-0226.04 HAS ONLY THE
 FIRST PAGE AND THEN OTHER PAGES NOT
 PERTINENT TO IT.
  
 NOA 01-0209.11 HAS AN ILLEGIBLE DRAWING.
  
 NOA 01-0209.10 HAS AN ILLEGIBLE DRAWING.
  
 NOA 00-0614.06 HAS AN ILLEGIBLE DRAWING.
Review Stop R ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2002-07-12 Cont ID  
Sent By hpiskura Date 2002-07-12 Time 13:36 Rev Time 0.00
Received By hpiskura Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2002-07-12 00:00:00THE ITEMS ON THE 6/17/02 CHECKLIST HAVE
 NOT BEEN ADDRESSED.ANOTHER COPY OF
 THAT LIST IS ATTACHED.
  
 THE SHEET C1 DATED 6/25/02 DOES NOT HAVE
 THE REQUESTED INFORMATION.
  
 WHEN RE-SUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE REMOVE
 ANY VOID, OUTDATED OR SUPERCEDED PAGES
 AND INSERT THE NEW INFORMATION WHERE
 NECESSARY.
Review Stop R ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2002-06-17 Cont ID  
Sent By pkrauss Date 2002-06-04 Time 13:02 Rev Time 0.00
Received By hpiskura Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2002-06-17 00:00:00SHEET S1 DECLARES A DESIGN BASED ON
 RATIONAL ANALYSIS.PLEASE PROVIDE
 COMPLETE CALCULATIONS, INCLUDING SOURCE
 OF REFERENCE(S) FOR WIND LOADS, AS
 PROVIDED FOR IN ASCE 7-98 SECTION
 6.5.8.3.DEMONSTRATE WHAT GUST FACTORS
 WERE USED AND IN WHAT COMBINATIONS.
 SHOW THE LOAD PER FOOT TRANSFERRED TO
 THE MASONRY WALLS BY THE ROOF DIAPHRAGM.
  
 SHOW THE MASONRY SPECIFICATION CRITERIA
 CONTAINED IN ACI 530 1.2.1,
 PARTICULARLYLENGTHS OF VERTICAL STEEL
 EMBED IN THE
 SINGLEBOND BEAMS, GROUT, POUR HEIGHT,
 CLEAR GROUT SPACE DIMENSION, ETC.
  
 S2 WRONGLY CITES ASCE 7-93 AND 110 MPH.
 THE 2001 FBC INVOKES ASCE 7-98 AND WEST
 PALM BEACH IS IN THE 140 MPH WIND ZONE.
 PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY AND NOTE IN
 ABOVE REQUESTED CALCULATIONS.
  
 THE LINTEL SCHEDULE ON SHEET S1 CALLS
 OUT AN 8F22-1B THAT IS NOT FOUND IN THE
 JCAST CRETE SCHEDULE, PLEASE CLARIFY
 THE INTENT.
  
 SBCCI REPORT #9933 FOR THE ENTEGRA ROOF
 TILE IS RATED FOR A 110 MPH WIND ZONE.
 SEE TABLE 1606.1.6.1 EQUIVALENT BASIC
 WIND SPEEDS.
  
 THE METRO-DADE NOA #01-0209.10 "DESIGNER
 WINDOWS" HAS AN ILLEGIBLE DRAWING.
  
 WHAT IS THE DRAWING LABELED BINNINGS PAN
 AMERICAN PA 7 11 01 464 INTENDED TO BE
 USED FOR?
  
 NOA 99-0223.04 FOR THE LAWSON MULLIONS,
 IS EXPIRED.
  
 THE ROBICO SHUTTERS, 00-0307.04, DRAWING
 IS ILLEGIBLE AND THE COMPONENTS ARE NOT
 SELECTED.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2002-05-17 Cont ID  
Sent By sgraham Date 2002-05-17 Time 12:07 Rev Time 0.25
Received By sgraham Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved