|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Plan Review Details - Permit 02030811
| Plan Review Stops For Permit 02030811 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2003-01-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2003-01-17 |
Time |
11:39 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2003-01-17 |
Time |
11:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2003-01-17 00:00:00 | BUILDING REVIEW CHECKLIST: | | | 1-PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED IS OTHER | | | THAN THE ONE SUBMITTED ORIGINALLY. | | | ENGINEER OF THIS PRODUCT APPROVAL | | | DEMANDS THAT DRAWINGS TO BE SIGNED AND | | | SEALED BY HIM IN ORDER TO BE USED FOR | | | BUILDING PERMIT. SEE NOTE #10 ON SHEET | | | 1 OF 5.ALSO, SINGLE SHEET SUBMITTED | | | DRAWING 02-279 NEEDS TO BE SIGNED AND | | | SEALED BY ENGINEER TO BE USED FOR | | | BUILDING PERMIT. SEE NOTE#9. | | | 2-THIS PERMIT DIDN'T PASS INSPECTIONS | | | BECAUSE APPARENTLY INSTALLATION DIDN'T | | | MATCH PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED. | | | NEED COORDINATION WITH THE BUILDING | | | INSPECTOR TO VERIFY THAT FIELD CONDI- | | | TIONS MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL. | | | 3-CLEARLY MARK ON DRAWINGS THE SPECIFIC | | | MOUNTING CONDITIONS AND ANCHOR TYPE | | | & SPACING TO BE USED ACCORDING TO THE | | | MEAN ROOF HEIGHT, DESIGN PRESSURES, | | | EDGE DISTANCE, PANEL SPAN, CONNECTION | | | TYPE AND STRUCTURE TO BE ATTACHED TO. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2002-09-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2003-01-16 |
Time |
16:59 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2002-09-18 |
Time |
14:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2002-09-18 00:00:00 | CHECKLIST: | | | INFORMATION SUBMITTED WAS THE SAME | | | PACKAGE THAT I GAVE CONTRACTOR WHEN HE | | | CAME TO FIND OUT WHY HE DIDN'T PASS THE | | | INSPECTION. THE PROBLEM SEEMS TO BE THAT | | | INSTALLATION DOESN'T MATCH PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL. THEREFORE, SITE SPECIFIC | | | ENGINEERING WAS REQUIRED BY THE BUILDING | | | INSPECTOR. SITE SPECIFIC INFORMATION | | | THAT MATCHES INSTALLATION WAS NOT SUB- | | | MITTED TO THIS DEPARTMENT. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2002-03-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2002-03-29 |
Time |
15:14 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2002-03-29 |
Time |
15:13 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2003-01-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2003-01-16 |
Time |
16:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2003-01-15 |
Time |
16:58 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2003-01-16 00:00:00 | TO JULIO./WRT. |
|
|
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |
|
