| Plan Review Stops For Permit 01110988 |
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2002-02-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2002-02-06 |
Time |
11:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2002-01-30 |
Time |
16:01 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2001-12-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2001-12-11 |
Time |
06:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2001-12-11 |
Time |
06:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2001-12-11 00:00:00 | ****************** UNSAT *********** | | | | | | | | | 1)NOTE: PLEASE NOTE, MISSING CONDUIT AND | | | CONDUCTOR SIZES FROM METER TO MAIN DISC- | | | S. PLEASE CLARIFY. | | | | | | 2)NOTE: PLEASE NOTE MISSING GARAGE RECEP | | | 210-52G AND GFI/ PER 210-8. | | | | | | 3)NOTE: PLEASE NOTE MISSING SMOKE DETECT | | | IN BEDROOM #4. PER NFPA-72 2-2.1.1.1 | | | | | | 4)NOTE: PLEASE NOTE MISSING OUTLET ON | | | KITCHEN COUNTERSPACE AS GFI. PER 210-8- | | | A-6. | | | | | | 5)NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT AIC RATINGS FOR | | | ALL NEW EQUIPMENT BEING INSTALLED. | | | MAINS/PANELS/BREAKERS MUST BE RATED FOR | | | THE AVAILABLE FAULT CURRENT PER 110-9. | | | | | | PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMATION FOR | | | REVIEW. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS, | | | PLEASE CALL. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICALPLAN REVIEW | | | 561-659-8096 EXT 8372 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2001-12-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
hmoser |
Date |
2001-12-13 |
Time |
17:35 |
Rev Time |
0.33 |
| Received By |
hmoser |
Date |
2001-12-13 |
Time |
17:35 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2001-12-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
hmoser |
Date |
2001-12-10 |
Time |
18:07 |
Rev Time |
0.33 |
| Received By |
hmoser |
Date |
2001-12-10 |
Time |
18:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2001-12-10 00:00:00 | PLAN DENIED | | | NO ENERGY CALCS OR MANUAL J | | | PLAN REVIEW BY HAROLD MOSER | | | [561]659-8096 EXT.8390 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2002-12-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2002-12-09 |
Time |
09:04 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2002-12-09 |
Time |
09:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2002-12-09 00:00:00 | REVISION OK - SANT. RISER DIAGRAM |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2002-05-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2002-05-15 |
Time |
17:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2002-05-15 |
Time |
17:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2002-05-15 00:00:00 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: SPC-94 | | | | | | 1) ALL REVISIONS TO A SIGNED AND SEALED | | | ARCHITECTURAL PLANS SHALL BE SIGNED AND | | | SEALED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD. TITLE | | | BLOCK ON REVISIONS REQUIRED. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 659-8096 EXT 8377 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2002-03-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleech |
Date |
2002-03-30 |
Time |
11:30 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
jleech |
Date |
2002-03-30 |
Time |
11:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2002-03-30 00:00:00 | SHOP DRAWINGS |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2002-01-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleech |
Date |
2002-01-26 |
Time |
09:44 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
jleech |
Date |
2002-01-26 |
Time |
09:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2001-12-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2001-12-07 |
Time |
16:46 |
Rev Time |
0.33 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2001-12-07 |
Time |
16:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2001-12-07 00:00:00 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: SPC-9 | | | | | | 1) SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM DOES NOT MATCH | | | FLOOR PLAN. POWDER ROOM AND MASTER BATH | | | ARE NOT REFLECTED ON RISER DIAGRAM. | | | PLEASE RESUBMIT. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 659-8096 EXT 8377 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2002-05-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2002-05-09 |
Time |
10:52 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2002-05-09 |
Time |
10:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2002-05-09 00:00:00 | TRUSS DRAWINGS SECOND CHECKLIST: | | | 1-TRUSS LAYOUT: REVISE/UPDATE AGAIN. | | | NEED SPECIFIC INFORMATION. SBC 1997 | | | FOR 110MPH AS PER DESIGN CRITERIA | | | USED FOR THE BUILDING ARCHITECT. | | | ASCE 7-93 AND SBC 1997 CAN'T BE MIXED | | | TOGETHER. SEC. 1606.1.2 SBC 1997. | | | IF USING ASCE, THEN THE CORRECT ONE IS | | | ASCE 7-95 FOR 140 MPH. | | | 2-UPDATE AND PROVIDE LEGIBLE AND CLEAR | | | GENERAL TRUSS DETAILS AND SPECS | | | ACCORDING TO THE CODE USED. | | | 3-CLARIFY WHY THERE ARE TWO ENGINEERS | | | ON GENERAL TRUSS DETAILS. WHO IS THE | | | ONE WHO PREPARED THE DETAILS? CHECK | | | CHAPTER 471 FLORIDA STATUTES FOR | | | ENGINEER'S RESPONSIBILITIES. | | | SAME APPLIES FOR TRUSS LAYOUT. | | | 4-REVISE ENGINEERED TRUSS DRAWINGS: | | | A)CODE USED TO BE SPECIFIC INCLUDING THE | | | YEAR. EG: SBC 1997. | | | B)DESIGN CRITERIA ON MIDDLE OF PAGE SAYS | | | SBC/ANSI95 WHILE NOTES AT THE BOTTOM | | | OF PAGE SAYS ASCE 7-93. SBC AND ASCE | | | CAN'T BE MIXED TOGETHER (SEC 1606.1.2. | | | SBC 1997). BESIDES, THE RIGHT ASCE IS | | | ASCE 7-95 FOR 140MPH. | | | C)NOTE THAT SAYS THAT THIS TRUSSES | | | COMPLIES WITH FLORIDA BUILDING CODE IS | | | NOT TRUE. REVIEW FBC 2001. BESIDES | | | FBC 2001 USES ASCE 7-98. | | | | | | 5-ARCHITECT TO PROVIDE A CLEAR ANCHOR | | | SCHEDULE WITH CONNECTORS THAT RESIST | | | THE UPLIFT & LATERAL LOADS CALCULATED | | | ON ENGINEERED TRUSSES. SOME CONNECTORS | | | DON'T MEET SUCH LOADS. REVIEW TRUSSES. | | | **NOTE: ANCHOR SCHEDULE CALLS FOR USP | | | ETA CONNECTORS. WHAT PAGE ON THE USP | | | CATALOGUE ARE THESE CONNECTORS LISTED? | | | I LOOKED THROUGHT CATALOGUE AND WAS | | | NOT ABLE TO FIND IT. | | | 6-RE-SUBMITTAL FEES WILL BE APPLIED | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING TRUSSES FOR MULTIPLE | | | REVIEWS. SEE ATTACHED COPY FOR | | | RE-SUBMITTAL FEES. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2002-04-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2002-04-01 |
Time |
12:17 |
Rev Time |
4.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2002-04-01 |
Time |
12:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2002-04-01 00:00:00 | SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: | | | 1-PROVIDE SITE SPECIFIC ENGINEERING | | | INFORMATION. USE ATTACHED SAMPLE,WHICH | | | NEEDS TO BE SIGNED, SEALED & DATED BY | | | THE MANUFACTURER'S ENGINEER AND BY THE | | | ARCHITECT OF RECORD AS WELL. (DON'T | | | FORGET TO INCLUDE ENGINEER'S AND | | | ARCHITECT INFORMATION AS REQUIRED BY | | | CHAPTER 471/481 OF FLORIDA STATUTES | | | WHEN SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS FOR PUBLIC | | | RECORDS. | | | **NOTE: STOREFRONT PRODUCT APPROVAL | | | SUBMITTED DOESN'T INCLUDE BUTT GLAZING. | | | GLASS IS SUPPORTED ON MULLIONS. | | | 2-PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD TO PROVIDE 2X | | | STRUCTURAL BUCK DETAIL FOR ENTRY DOORS | | | AND STOREFRONT SYSTEM (SEE PRODUCT | | | APPROVALS). | | | 3-TRUSS DRAWINGS: | | | A)ALL TRUSS DRAWINGS TO BE REVIEWED BY | | | PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUB- | | | MITTAL. USE STANDARD REVIEW STAMP. | | | B)TRUSS LAYOUT: REVISE/UPDATE DESIGN | | | CRITERIA. ASCE 7-95 FOR 140MPH OR SBC | | | 1997 FOR 110MPH. | | | C)UPDATE GENERAL TRUSS DETAILS & ENG'R | | | TO SIGN, SEAL AND THEM AS REQUIRED BY | | | CHAPTER 471 OF FLORIDA STATUTES. | | | SEE REVIEWED SET FOR COMMENTS AND | | | PROVIDE LEGIBLE DRAWINGS. | | | D)REVISE ENGINEERED TRUSS DRAWINGS: | | | DESIGN CRITERIA TO BE ASCE 7-95 140MPH | | | OR SBC 1997 110MPH NOT SFBC. | | | (NOTE: MUST BE SPECIFIC WITH EDITION | | | OF CODE. EG: SBC 1997 OR ASCE 7-95) | | | E)ARCHITECT REVISE /UPDATE TRUSS ANCHOR | | | SCHEDULE. CLARIFY WHICH USP CATALOGUE | | | WAS USED. I WAS UNABLE TO FIND ETA | | | CONNECTORS IN THE USP 2001 CATALOGUE. | | | ALSO, WHEN REVIEWING ENGINEERED TRUSS | | | CHECK THAT CONNECTORS SPECIFIED WILL | | | RESIST THE UPLIFT LOADS CALCULATED AND | | | THEY WILL BE APPROPRIATE TO INSTALL | | | ACCORDING TO THE TRUSS PROFILE. | | | EG: SEE PROFILE OF TRUSS H10 AND | | | CONNECTOR SPECIFIED. CONNECTOR WAS | | | DESIGNED TO GO AROUND TRUSS TOP CHORD. | | | HOW IS THIS ACHIEVED AT THE END SIDE | | | OF TRUSS WHERE HEEL IS VERY HIGH? | | | | | | | | | NOTE: | | | STAMPED DRAWINGS AND PRODUCT APPROVALS | | | ARE THE ONES THAT ARE APPROVED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2002-03-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2002-03-13 |
Time |
18:17 |
Rev Time |
0.33 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2002-03-13 |
Time |
18:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2002-03-13 00:00:00 | REVISIONS ARE APPROVED. | | | PLEASE SUBMIT ALL INFORMATION REQUESTED | | | ON PROVISO DATED 2-6-02. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2002-02-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2002-02-07 |
Time |
17:09 |
Rev Time |
4.50 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2002-02-06 |
Time |
19:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2002-02-07 00:00:00 | APPROVED WITH PROVISO: | | | 1-SOIL TEST REPORT TO HAVE ORIGINAL SEAL | | | SIGNATURE AND DATE AS REQUIRED BY | | | CHAPTER 471 FLORIDA STATUTES WHEN | | | SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS FOR PUBLIC RECORD | | | 2-PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR STORM | | | SHUTTERS UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT. | | | 3-PROVIDE AT LEAST ONE BATHROOM WITH A | | | DOOR THAT ALLOWS AT LEAST 29" CLEAR | | | OPENING (POWDER RM DOESN'T QUALIFY). | | | 4-PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR: | | | A)ENTRY DOORS (ONE SUBMITTED EXPIRED). | | | B)GLASS BLOCK WITH LEGIBLE DRAWINGS. | | | C)BUTT GLAZING ASSEMBLY AS SHOWN ON | | | PLANS. IF PRODUCT APPROVAL IS NOT | | | AVAILABLE, THEN PROVIDE COMPLETE | | | ENGINEERING & SPECIFICATIONS FOR SITE | | | SPECIFIC INSTALLATION AND USE ATTACHED | | | SAMPLE FORM. THIS FORM TO BE SIGNED, | | | SEALED AND DATED BY THE MANUFACTURER'S | | | ENGINEER AND BY THE ARCHITECT OF | | | RECORD. | | | D)BBQ UL LISTING. | | | E)FIXED WINDOWS: CLEARLY INDICATE ON | | | APPROVED DRAWINGS THE COMPONENTS TO BE | | | USED IN THIS PROJECT. | | | ALSO, INDICATE WINDOWS TO BE USED | | | ACCORDING TO THE DESIGN PRESSURES | | | CALCULATED BY THE ARCHITECT. | | | F)HIGH DENSITY FOAM SPECS. | | | 5-PROVIDE COMPLETE SPECIFICATIONS FOR | | | CEILING INSTALLATION AT ENTRY AND REAR | | | PORCH. DON'T CITE THE CODE. SEE ASTM | | | C926 AND ASTM C1063 AND PROVIDE THE | | | REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS. | | | SEC. 104.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS TO SBC/97 | | | 6-REVISE DETAIL E OF A8 TO MATCH ACTUAL | | | CONDITIONS. SEE FRONT ELEVATION. | | | 7-CLARIFY TRUSS ANCHOR SCHEDULE. WHAT | | | CATALOGUE WAS USED TO FIND THE ETA | | | CONNECTORS?. | | | 8-PROVIDE PLANS/DETAILS FOR OPTIONAL | | | SHOWER AT POWDER ROOM. | | | 9-PROVIDE SURVEY WITH BUILDING LAYOUT. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2001-12-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2001-12-28 |
Time |
16:45 |
Rev Time |
3.50 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2001-12-28 |
Time |
16:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2001-12-28 00:00:00 | CHECKLIST: | | | 1-AFTER ORIGINAL DRAWINGS ARE REVISED, | | | PLEASE BRING THEM TO THE COUNTY TO | | | PAY IMPACT FEES. BRING PAID RECEIPT. | | | 2-NEED TO RECORD NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. | | | 3-PROVIDE SOIL TEST REPORT WITH INFO. | | | REQUIRED ON SECTION 1804.2.7 OF CITY | | | AMENDMENTS TO SBC 1997. | | | 4-ARCHITECT TO FILL OUT THE DESIGN | | | CERTIFICATION FOR BUILDING CODE | | | COMPLIANCE FORM. ATTACHED. | | | 5-SPECIFY SAFETY GLASS WHERE REQUIRED. | | | SEE PLANS AND SECTION 2405.2 SBC 1997. | | | 6-REVISE ENERGY CALCULATIONS: | | | A)REVISE UNDER ATTIC AREA. SEE SECTION | | | 604.1.A.1 FLORIDA ENERGY EFFICIENCY | | | CODE FOR BUILDING CONSTRUCTION, 1997. | | | B)REVISE # OF BEDROOMS. SEE PLANS AND | | | BEDRM DEFINITION ON FL. ENERGY CODE. | | | C)COMPLETE INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM. | | | D)OWNER/AGENT TO SIGN AND DATE THE | | | ENERGY CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | 7-PROVIDE PLANS FOR OPTIONAL BATHROOM | | | AT BEDROOM #4. | | | 8-SPECIFY SIZE OF ATTIC ACCESS. SECTION | | | 2309.6 SBC 1997. | | | 9-BEDROOM #5 WINDOWS DON'T COMPLY WITH | | | EGRESS REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 1005.4 | | | SBC 1997. 24SH WINDOW DON'T PROVIDE | | | THE MIN. CLEAR HT OPENING REQUIRED. | | | 10-PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR | | | STORM PANELS. SEE ATTACHED POLICY OR | | | APPLY UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT. | | | 11-PROVIDE AT LEAST ONE BATHROOM WITH A | | | DOOR THAT HAS A 29" CLEAR OPENING. | | | SECTION 11 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY | | | CODE FOR BUILDING CONSTRUCTION, 1997. | | | 12-PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR: | | | A)ROOF TILE. B)EXTERIOR DOORS AND | | | WINDOWS, INCLUDING ARCHED WINDOWS AND | | | FIXED WINDOWS. C)GARAGE DOORS. D)BUTT | | | GLAZING ASSEMBLY AS SHOWN ON PLANS. | | | E)FIREPLACE. F)GLASS BLOCK. G)BBQ UL | | | LISTING. H)WINDOW MULLIONS. | | | 13-PROVIDE COMPLETE SPECIFICATIONS FOR | | | STUCCO APPLICATION AT ENTRY AND REAR | | | PORCH AS REQUIRED BY ASTM C 926 AND | | | ASTM C1063.SEC. 2504.2 SBC 1997. | | | 14-TRUSS ANCHOR SCHEDULE NEED TO BE | | | UPDATED. SEMCO AND HUGHES ARE NOT | | | LONGER IN BUSINESS. USP BOUGHT THEM. | | | 15-SEE PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AND | | | PLEASE RETURN REVIEWED SET OF PLANS | | | AFTER CORRECTIONS ARE DONE TO THE | | | ORIGINAL DRAWINGS IN ORDER TO EXPEDITE | | | THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2002-02-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
sgraham |
Date |
2002-02-06 |
Time |
11:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
sgraham |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2001-12-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
sgraham |
Date |
2001-12-03 |
Time |
15:31 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
| Received By |
sgraham |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|