| Plan Review Stops For Permit 01101112 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
9 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2002-09-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmartine |
Date |
2002-09-25 |
Time |
13:19 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
lmartine |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2002-09-25 00:00:00 | APPROVED REVISION FOR WINDOWS AWNING TO | | | FIXED |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
8 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2002-09-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
hpiskura |
Date |
2002-09-13 |
Time |
07:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
hpiskura |
Date |
2002-09-13 |
Time |
07:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2002-09-13 00:00:00 | PRODUCT CONTROL NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE | | | 01-0129.09 HAS AN ILLEGIBLE DRAWING. | | | | | | PRODUCT APPROVALS NOT INCLUDED WITH THE | | | ORIGINAL PERMIT APPLICATION REQUIRE A | | | SEPARATE PERMIT AND FEES. | | | | | | THIS SAME REJECTION HAS BEEN PROVIDED | | | TO THIS CONTRACTOR AND OWNER PREVIOUSLY. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2002-08-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
hpiskura |
Date |
2002-08-05 |
Time |
14:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
hpiskura |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2002-08-05 00:00:00 | PRODUCT APPROVALS OR NOTICE OF | | | ACCEPTANCE REPORTS NOT INCLUDED WITH | | | THE ORIGINAL PERMIT APPLICATION REQUIRE | | | A SEPARATE PERMIT AND FEES PAID TO THE | | | CITY. | | | | | | THE MIAMI DADE NOA 00-0315.02 HAS | | | SEVERAL PAGES OF THE DRAWING THAT ARE | | | ILLEGIBLE.WITH THE NEW PERMIT | | | APPLICATION INCLUDE TWO, LEGIBLE COPIES | | | OF THE | | | NOA, WITH THE COMPONENTS CLEARLY MARKED. | | 2002-07-17 00:00:00 | RE: PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED 7/16/02 | | | | | | | | | A SEPARATE PERMIT AND FEES ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS WHEN THE | | | EVALUATION OR NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE | | | REPORTS ARE NOT INCLUDED WITH THE | | | ORIGINAL BUILDING PERMIT. | | | | | | METRO-DADE NOA 99-0218.01 IS EXPIRED. | | | | | | READ EACH REPORT AND PROVIDE THE | | | NECESSARY INFORMATION CONTAINED IN | | | THOSE REPORTS TOGETHER WITH THE PERMIT | | | APPLICATION.BE SURE ALL PAGES ARE | | | LEGIBLE AND THE DESIGN LOADS, SIZES, | | | SPANS, ETC. ARE COMPATIBLE WITH THE | | | ORIGINAL PLAN DESIGN INFORMATION. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2002-03-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
hpiskura |
Date |
2002-03-19 |
Time |
08:35 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
| Received By |
hpiskura |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2002-03-19 00:00:00 | IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO THE COUNTY, | | | THE PERMIT PLANS STAMPED BY THAT OFFICE | | | AND A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT ATTACHED | | | TO THE PERMIT APPLICATION.CALL | | | 233-5025 FOR MORE INFORMATION. | | | | | | PROVIDE A COPY OF THE NOTICE OF | | | COMMENCEMENT THAT HAS BEEN FILED WITH | | | THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THIS | | | WORK. | | | | | | PAY THE REMAINDER OF THE PERMIT FEES | | | DUE TO THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2002-03-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
hpiskura |
Date |
2002-03-13 |
Time |
13:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
hpiskura |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2002-03-13 00:00:00 | THE PLANS SIGNED, SEALED AND DATED BY | | | JOSEPH T. LATERZA, PE MARCH 8, 2002 | | | CONTINUE TO HAVE INCOMPLETE AND | | | INCORRECT INFORMATION.THIS IS THE | | | FIFTH REJECTION AND IS BEING FILED WITH | | | THE FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL | | | ENGINEERS. | | | | | | | | | THE LETTER ATTACHED TO THOSE PLANS | | | TITLED "ATTENTION HAROLD PISKURA" SEEKS | | | TO | | | ADDRESS PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS.THE | | | ENGINEER ALLEGES "RECOGNITION" AND | | | "APPROVAL" IN ACCORDANCE WITH NER | | | REPORT405 AND THE METRO-DADE ACCEPTANCE | | | REPORT#99-0223.07 | | | | | | 1BOTHREPORTS SPECIFY A MINIMUM OF | | | 20GAUGE METAL STUDS.THE LATERZA PLAN | | | SPECIFIES A 25 GAUGE METAL STUD WHICH | | | IS OF LESS MATERIALVALUE. | | | | | | 2BOTH REPORTS REQUIRE THE | | | INCORPORATION OF 5/8 INCH PLYWOOD | | | SHEATHING SUBSTRATE AS A CONDITION OF | | | USE FOR THE "HARDIPANEL" TO COMPLY WITH | | | THOSE LISTINGS.HERE, THE ENGINEER | | | PROPOSES THE SUBSTITUTION OF "DUROCK" | | | FOR THAT OF THE PLYWOOD.LATERZA | | | PROVIDES NOTHING TO DEMONSTRATE THAT | | | "DUROCK" IS AN EQUAL AND ALTERNATE | | | MATERIAL TO THE PLYWOOD, (STRUCTURAL | | | PANELS) SPECIFIED IN THE ACCEPTANCE | | | REPORTS. | | | | | | THE ENGINEER PROPOSES ATTACHING THE | | | "DUROCK" TO THE METAL STUDS OVER TWO | | | LAYERS OF TYPE X DRYWALL WITH TYPE "S" | | | DRYWALL SCREWS SPACE 12" CENTER TO | | | CENTER.THE "HARDIPANEL" IS THEN TO BE | | | APPLIED USING "ET-F PIN 2 1/2" LONG X 0. | | | 10 KNURLED SHANK X 0.25 HD PIN FASTNER | | | ES 4144 4" OC EDGE 8" OC FIELD ( PER | | | NER-405 REPORT) SEE ATTACHED SPECS" | | | | | | 3DUROCK, A US GYPSUM PRODUCT,HAS ITS | | | OWN LISTINGS WITH RECOGNIZED AGENCIES, | | | INCLUDING SBCCI.THESE WERE NOT | | | INCLUDED WITH THE PLANS SUBMITTAL. | | | THOSE LISTINGS FOR EXTERIOR USE OF THAT | | | PRODUCT REQUIRE A PROPRIETARY OR | | | CORROSION RESISTANT FASTENER AND A | | | WATERPROOF BARRIER.THE FASTENER | | | SPACING IN THOSE LISTINGS ARE A MAXIMUM | | | OF 8" OC | | | WHICH DOES NOT COMPARE FAVORABLY WITH | | | THE ENGINEER'S SPECIFICATION OF AN | | | DRYWALL SCREW INTENDED FOR INTERIOR USE | | | AND AT A 50% GREATER SPACING. | | | | | | 4THE ET&F PIN THAT THE ENGINEER | | | PROPOSES ATTACHING THE HARDIPANEL TO | | | THE WALL SYSTEM IS A PNEUMATICALLY | | | DRIVEN FASTENER INTENDED FOR THE | | | INSTALLATION OF GYPSUM LIKE MATERIALS | | | TO METAL STUDS. | | | | | | TO MAKE THE ASSUMPTION THAT SUCH A | | | FASTENER APPLIED IN THE "FIELD 8" OC" | | | AND TO HAVE ANY STRUCTURAL VALUE WHEN | | | LOADED IN WITHDRAWL, FROM DRYWALL AND | | | DUROCK CANNOT BE CONSIDERED GOOD | | | ENGINEERING JUDGEMENT AND IS IN DIRECT | | | CONTRADICTION OF THE EVALUATION REPORTS | | | THAT JOSEPH LATERZA, PE | | | SAYS ARE HIS RECOGNIZED METHODOLOGIES. | | | | | | THE USE OF THESE PRODUCTS IS NOT | | | ALLOWED UNLESS THEY ARE USED IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR LISTINGS, OR | | | SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE AS AN ALTERNATE | | | METHOD AS PROVIDED FOR IN SBC 103.7. | | | | | | TO DATE NEITHER OF THESE OPTIONS HAS | | | BEEN ACCOMPLISHED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2002-03-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
hpiskura |
Date |
2002-03-04 |
Time |
09:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
hpiskura |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2002-03-04 00:00:00 | THE METRO-DADE NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE FOR | | | THE JAMES HARDIE BUILDING PRODUCT IS | | | INCOMPLETE.HOWEVER THOSE TWO PAGES | | | ARE PREDICATIED UPON THE USE OF PLYWOOD | | | SHEATHING AS A SUBSTRATE, WHICH IS NOT | | | ALLOWED IN NON-COMBUSTIBLE EXTERIOR | | | WALL CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | THE EXCERPT FROM NER 405, PAGE 15 OF | | | 32,HAS HI-LITED THE UBC.THE CITY OF | | | WEST PALM BEACH AT THE TIME OF THIS | | | APPLICATION WAS USING THE SBC AND 110 | | | MPH.THAT SAME PAGE SHOWS SBC @ 100 | | | MPH. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2002-02-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
hpiskura |
Date |
2002-02-12 |
Time |
07:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
hpiskura |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2002-02-12 00:00:00 | THE CUT SHEET LABELED "JAMES HARDIE" | | | DOES NOT HAVE THE INFORMATION NECESSARY | | | FOR THE PRODUCT TO DETERMINE CODE | | | COMPLIANCE.OBTAIN THE NER-405 REPORT | | | AND DETERMINE THE PARTICULAR | | | APPLICATION METHOD. | | | | | | PROVIDE A SPECIFIC FIRE DESIGN FOR THE | | | REQUIED TWO HOUR RATED WALLS.SEE SBC | | | 701.5.2.THIS WAS REQUESTED IN THE | | | PREVIOUS CODE COMMENTS. | | | | | | SHOW THE REQUIRED 2 HOUR FIRE RATED | | | OCCUPANCY SEPARATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | SBC 704.1.1 AS PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED. | | | | | | PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SIGNED CONTRACT | | | TOGETHER WITH A DETAILED TAKEOFF, | | | INCLUDING EXTENSIONS, TO JUSTIFY THE | | | DECLARED PERMIT VALUATION. | | | | | | PLEASE COLLATE THE PLANS INTO TWO | | | CONCISE SETS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2002-01-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
hpiskura |
Date |
2002-01-07 |
Time |
14:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
hpiskura |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2002-01-07 00:00:00 | THE EXTERIOR WALL ON THE NORTH ELEVATION | | | IS REQUIRED TO BE 2 HR FIRE RATED WITH | | | OPENING PROTECTIVES.SEE SBC TABLE 600 | | | FOR TYPE V CONSTRUCTION, EXTERIOR | | | NON-BEARING WALLS, OVER 3FT TO 10FT. | | | SEE ALSOFOOTNOTES (B) AND (C).REVISE | | | AS NECESSARY, INCLUDE THE FIRE DESIGN | | | NUMBER, SEE SBC 701.5.2.THIS WAS NOTED | | | ON THE 11/13/01 COMMENT LIST. | | | | | | | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE "HARDI | | | BOARD" SIDING AS TO ITS SUITABILITY AS | | | A STRUCTURAL SHEATHING. | | | | | | WHAT IS THE NATURE AND CHARACTER OF THE | | | GOODS TO BE STORED IN THE WAREHOUSE? | | | SEE SBC 104.2 AND SBC 312.2. | | | | | | SHOW THE FIRE DESIGN FOR THE MIXED | | | OCCUPANCY SEPARATION.SEE SBC 704.1.1, | | | INCLUDE THE OPENING PROTECTIVES. | | | | | | SHEET 3 OF 4 WIND LOAD SCHEDULE, SHOWS | | | PRESSURES RANGING FROM 0.5 TO 2.087. | | | SBC1606.2.2.3. PROHIBITS DESIGN USING | | | LESS THAN 10 PSF FOR ANY PART OF A | | | BUILDING.PROVIDE COMPLETE, SIGNED, | | | SEALED AND DATED CALCULATIONS FOR THE | | | WIND LOAD ANALYSIS. | | | | | | PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SIGNED CONTRACT | | | TOGETHER WITH A DETAILED TAKEOFF TO | | | JUSTIFY THE $22,000.00 VALUATION.THIS | | | WAS PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED. | | | | | | THE "NEW" PLAN SETS DO NOT HAVE SHEET 4 | | | OF 4. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2001-11-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
hpiskura |
Date |
2001-11-13 |
Time |
09:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
hpiskura |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2001-11-13 00:00:00 | PLEASE PROVIDE A RECENT PROPERTY SURVEY | | | SIGNED SEALED AND DATED. | | | | | | THE CONVERSION AND ENCLOSING OF THE | | | LOADING DOCK IS SUBJECT TO IMPACT FEES | | | COLLECTED BY THE COUNTY FOR THE CITY. | | | THE PERMIT PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY | | | THAT OFFICE AND A COPY OF THE PAID | | | RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT | | | APPLICATION.CALL 561-233-5025FOR | | | MORE INFORMATION. | | | | | | THIS BUILDING IS LOCATED IN THE | | | DESIGNATED FIRE DISTRICT AND TYPE VI | | | (COMBUSTIBLE PLYWOOD SHEATHING) IS | | | PROHIBITTED. | | | | | | IT APPEARS FROM THE SITE PLAN, SUBJECT | | | TO VERIFICATION BY SURVEY, THAT THE NEW | | | EXTERIOR WALLS ON THE NORTH AND EAST | | | ELEVATIONS ARE REQUIRED BY SBC TABLE | | | 600 TO BE AT LEAST 2 HR FIRE RATED WITH | | | OPENING PROTECTIVES FOR THIS BUILDINGS' | | | TYPE V CONSTRUCTION.PLEASE REVISE AS | | | NECESSARY. | | | | | | SEE ALSO SBC 704.5.2 PARAPET WALL | | | REQUIRMENTS. | | | | | | WHAT IS THE NATURE AND QUANTITY OF GOODS | | | TO BE STORED IN THE WAREHOUSE? SEE SBC | | | 104.2 AND SBC 312.2. | | | | | | WHAT IS THE INTENDED USE OF TENANT | | | SPACES 1 AND 2? SEE SBC 104.2. | | | | | | | | | SBC 704.1.1 REQUIRES A MIXED OCCUPANCY | | | SEPARATION BETWEEN THE WAREHOUSE AND | | | THE OTHER SPACES. (2 HR MIN) | | | | | | WHAT IS THE GAUGE AND TYPE OF 6" METAL | | | STUDS AND TOP AND BOTTOM CHANNELS TO BE | | | USED? | | | | | | SPECIFY THE SIZE AND TYPE OF WELDS TO BE | | | USED TO CONNNECT THE TOP CHANNEL TO THE | | | EXISTING BEAM. | | | | | | PROVIDE A WINDOW AND DOOR BUCK ANCHORING | | | DETAIL. | | | | | | SHOW THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR THE | | | STOREFRONT, ROLL UP DOOR AND ROOF | | | COVERING.SHOW HOW THE GLAZED AREAS | | | WILL COMPLY WITH THE CITY'S HURRICANE | | | MISSILE IMPACT ORDINANCE.ALSO, IF | | | COMPLETE PRODUCT INFORMATION IS NOT | | | PROVIDED WITH THIS PERMIT APPLICATION, | | | SEPARATE PERMITS AND FEES WILL BE | | | REQUIRED FOR THAT WORK. | | | | | | PROVIDE CONFIRMATION THAT THE EXISTING | | | STAIRS MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SBC | | | 1007 OR DETAILS TO MODIFY AS NECESSARY | | | FOR ALL OF THOSE REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | SHOW A DETAIL FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF | | | THE DUMPSTER WALL. | | | | | | THE PAIR OF DOORS FROM TENANT SPACE #2 | | | OBSTRUCT EGRESS FROM THE WAREHOUSE, | | | SEE SBC 1012.1.5. | | | | | | THE DECLARED VELOCITY PRESSURE OF 25PSF | | | DOES NOT AGREE WITH THE STATED ROJOF | | | HEIGHT OF 35'.PLEASE CLARIFY. | | | | | | THE $22,000.00 VALUATION IS TOO LOW FOR | | | THIS SCOPE OF WORK.PROVIDE A COPY OF | | | THE SIGNED CONTRACT TOGETHER WITH A | | | DETAILED TAKEOFF INCLUDING EXTENSIONS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2002-02-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2002-02-11 |
Time |
18:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2002-02-11 |
Time |
18:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2002-01-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2002-01-07 |
Time |
17:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2002-01-07 |
Time |
17:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2002-01-07 00:00:00 | ****************** UNSAT ************** | | | | | | 1)NOTE: PLEASE NOTE THAT ONLY ONE NOTE | | | FROM FIRST REVIEW NOTES WERE CLARIFIED. | | | | | | PLEASE SEE FIRST SET OF NOTES ATTACHED. | | | PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMATION FOR | | | REVIEW. IF THERE ARE NAY QUESTIONS, | | | PLEASE CALL. | | | | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-659-8096 EXT 8372 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2001-11-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2001-11-05 |
Time |
19:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2001-11-05 |
Time |
19:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2001-11-05 00:00:00 | *************** UNSAT ****************** | | | | | | 1)NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT AIC RATINGS FOR | | | ALL NEW EQUIPMENT BEING INSTALLED. | | | MAINS/PANELS/BREAKERS MUST BE RATED FOR | | | THE AVAILABLE FAULT CURRENT PER 110-9. | | | | | | 2)NOTE: PLEASE SHOW LOAD CALCUALTIONS | | | AND SHOW ALL CONTINUOS LOADS AT 125% | | | 215-5/230-42/215-3 ECT. | | | | | | 3)NOTE: PLANS NEED TO HAVE ALL BRANCH | | | CIRCUIT #`S SHOWN ON PLANS AND CORRELATE | | | WITH SUBMITTED PANEL SCHEDULES. | | | | | | 4)NOTE: PLEASE NOTE THAT PLANS ARE | | | SHOWING THREE NEW SERVICES? PLEASE NOTE | | | ONLY ONE HOUR SEPARATION BETWEEN 1&2, | | | SEPARATE SERVICES MAY BE USED BUT MUST | | | MEET TWO HOUR RATING. PLEASE CLARIFY | | | RATING BETWEEN 2&3? | | | PLEASE CALRIFY EXITING FROM SPACE 2 TO | | | SPACE 3?? | | | | | | 5)NOTE: PLEASE NOTE OUTLETS ABOVE WINDOW | | | S ARE NOTED FOR SIGNS? PLEASE NOTE THESE | | | OUTLETS NEED TO MEET 210-62 FOR SHOW | | | WINDOW(S). AND CIRCUIT REQ`D FOR SIGN(S) | | | ARE TO MEET 600-5. | | | PLEASE ADJUST. | | | | | | 6) PLEASE CLARIFY EQUIPMENT GROUNDING | | | METHOD BETWEEN FIRST MEANS OF DISCONNECT | | | AND PANEL(S). EQUIPMENT GROUNDING | | | CONDUCTORS ARE TO BE SIZED BY 250-122. | | | | | | 7)NOTE: PLEASE NOTE MISSING CONDUCTORS | | | FOR SERVICE METER TO MAIN AND MAIN TO | | | PANEL.? CONDUIT SIZES? 215-5 | | | | | | | | | PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMAITON FOR | | | REVIEW. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS, | | | PLEASE CALL. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-659-8096 EXT 8372 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2002-03-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2002-03-06 |
Time |
12:38 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
jleech |
Date |
2002-10-03 |
Time |
17:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2002-02-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2002-02-07 |
Time |
08:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2002-02-07 |
Time |
08:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2002-02-07 00:00:00 | 1) THE PLANS INDICATE THAT A ONE HOUR | | | WALL IS PRESENT BETWEEN THE WAREHOUSE | | | AND THE RETAIL PORTION. THE DOUBLE | | | DOORS LOCATED WITHIN THIS WALL ARE NOT | | | RATED. A REVIEW OF THE FIRE CODES | | | INDICATES THAT A ONE HOUR FIRE WALL | | | IS REQUIRED BETWEEN THE RETAIL AND | | | THE WAREHOUSE THUS THE DOORS WOULD | | | HAVE TO BE FIRE RATED AT LEAST 45 | | | MINUTES. THE BUILDING CODE REQUIRES | | | AT LEAST A TWO HOUR SEPARATION BETWEEN | | | STORAGE LOW HAZARD, AND OTHER | | | OCCUPANCIES WHEN A MIXED OCCUPANCY | | | OCCURS. PLEASE STANDARD BUILDING CODE, | | | SECTION 704.1, OCCUPANCY SEPARATION | | | REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE CORRECT THE PLANS | | | TO THE MORE RESTRICTIVE CODE | | | REQUIREMENTS. | | | 2) EXIT SIGNAGE AND EMERGENCY LIGHTING | | | WILL BE REQUIRED. | | | | | | MIKE CARSILLO, CAPTAIN | | | 659-8096,EXT.8497 | | | 835-2910 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2002-01-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2002-01-03 |
Time |
13:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2002-01-03 |
Time |
13:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2002-01-03 00:00:00 | 1) THE BUILDING CODE REQUIRES A TWO | | | HOUR SEPARATION BETWEEN THE WAREHOUSE | | | AND THE RETAIL AREA. THE FIRE CODE | | | REQUIRES A ONE HOUR FIRE RATING BETWEEN | | | THE WAREHOUSE AND THE RETAIL AREA. SINCE | | | THE BUILDING CODE IS MORE RESTRICTIVE | | | THEN IT SHALL APPLY IN THIS SITUATION. | | | 2) ARE THE DOORS THAT SWING INWARD | | | FIRE RATED. | | | 3) IS THE WAREHOUSE THE SAME TENANT | | | AS THE RETAIL AREA OR ARE THEY | | | DIFFERENT. PLEASE ADVISED. | | | | | | MIKE CARSILLO, CAPTAIN | | | 659-8096,EXT.8497 | | | 835-2910 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2001-10-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2001-10-25 |
Time |
16:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2001-10-25 |
Time |
16:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2001-10-25 00:00:00 | 1) PLEASE PROVIDE A SITE PLAN FOR | | | REVIEW. | | | 2) TENANT SPACE 2 APPEARS TO EXIT INTO | | | WAREHOUSE SPACE # 3. PLEASE EXPLAIN. | | | 3) EXISTING CONCRETE STAIRS ARE FOR | | | WHAT. PLEASE CLARIFY. | | | 4) WALL SHOWN BETWEEN TENANTS 1 & 2 AND | | | WAREHOUSE SPACE 3 RATED? | | | 5) ROLL-UP DOOR BEING SHOWN AS AN EXIT. | | | THIS ARRANGEMENT IS NOT PERMITTED. | | | 6) INTERIOR FINISH FOR WALLS AND | | | CEILINGS REQUIRED. | | | 7) PLEASE EXPLAIN EXITING FROM | | | WAREHOUSE SPACE # 3. | | | | | | MIKE CARSILLO, CAPTAIN | | | 659-8096,EXT.8497 | | | 835-2910 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2002-01-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pkrauss |
Date |
2002-01-17 |
Time |
13:14 |
Rev Time |
0.30 |
| Received By |
pkrauss |
Date |
2002-01-05 |
Time |
10:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2002-01-05 00:00:00 | | | | NO MECHANICAL PLANS SUBMITTED FOR | | | REVIEW.PLEASE PROVIDE PLANS WITH | | | MECHANICAL PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | NOTE:AS PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | CODE OF ORDINANCES, MECHANICAL | | | EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SHIELDED FROM | | | VIEW. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE | | | CONTACT PATTY KRAUSS AT 659-8096 | | | EXT. 8388. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2001-11-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pkrauss |
Date |
2001-11-08 |
Time |
12:25 |
Rev Time |
0.30 |
| Received By |
pkrauss |
Date |
2001-11-08 |
Time |
12:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2001-11-08 00:00:00 | | | | | | | NO MECHANICAL PLANS SUBMITTED FOR | | | REVIEW.PLEASE PROVIDE PLANS WITH | | | MECHANICAL PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE | | | CONTACT PATTY KRAUSS AT 659-8096 | | | EXT. 8388. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2002-10-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleech |
Date |
2002-10-03 |
Time |
17:17 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
jleech |
Date |
2002-10-03 |
Time |
17:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2002-10-03 00:00:00 | REVISED PLAN DELETED WATER HEATER AND | | | MOP SINK. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2002-03-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2002-03-04 |
Time |
17:17 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2002-03-04 |
Time |
17:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2002-03-04 00:00:00 | RE-REVIEW SET OF PLAN WITH NEW DATE ON | | | SEAL |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2002-01-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pschmitz |
Date |
2002-01-17 |
Time |
11:32 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
pschmitz |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2001-11-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2001-11-03 |
Time |
14:09 |
Rev Time |
0.75 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2001-11-03 |
Time |
14:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2001-11-03 00:00:00 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: SPC-94 - FACBC-97 | | | | | | 1) PAGE 1 TOILET ROOMS ARE NOT LARGE | | | ENOUGH. ROOM TO COMPLY WITH FACBC SEC | | | 4.22. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH ALL CLEAR | | | FLOOR SPACE, TURNING RADIUS ECT. | | | 4.16 W/C - FIGURE 28 (MINIMUM 7'5") | | | 4.19 LAV - FIGURE 31. | | | 2) PAGE 1 DRINKING FOUNTAINS ARE REQUIR- | | | ED FOR EACH TENANT SPACE PER SPC TABLE | | | 407. SHOW DETAILS FOR COMPLIANCE FACBC | | | SEC 4.15 AND SEC 4.1.3(10) PROVISIONS | | | FOR THOSE WHO HAVE DIFFICULTY BENDING OR | | | STOOPING IN HI/LOW NOT INSTALLED. | | | 3) SEPARATE METERS AND RPZ BACKFLOW PRE- | | | VENTER REQUIRED FOR WATER SERVICE. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 659-8096 EXT 8377 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2001-12-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
sgraham |
Date |
2001-12-31 |
Time |
11:30 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
| Received By |
sgraham |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2001-10-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
sgraham |
Date |
2001-10-25 |
Time |
09:27 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
| Received By |
sgraham |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2001-10-25 00:00:00 | 1. ENTRANCE MUST BE IN THE FRONT OF BLDG | | | 2. WINDOWS ON WEST ELEVATION MUST BE | | | VERTICAL OR SQUARE. | | | 3WINDOWS MUST BE MOUNTED 2" IN THE | | | SILL. | | | 4.SEE LETTER FROM LANSCAPE ARCHITECT |
|
|