| 2001-06-06 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | O/B NUNEZ, CARMELA |
| | PERMIT # 01051100 |
| | 3000 STANFORD ROAD |
| | |
| | 1)- OWNER / BUILDERS ARE TO FOLLOW THE |
| | STANDARD BUILDING CODE SSTD 10-97 WHEN |
| | PLANS AREN'T DRAWN BY A DESIGN PROFES- |
| | SIONAL. THIS IS A PRESCRIPTIVE CODE, |
| | WHERE SPECIFIC CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS |
| | ARE NOT GIVEN, APPROPRIATE REQUIREMENTS |
| | OF THE STANDARD BUILDING CODE SHALL |
| | PREVAIL. WINDOWS AND DOORS SHALL BE |
| | DESIGNED FOR COMPONENTS & CLADDING LOADS |
| | OF THE SBC 1606. |
| | |
| | 2)- SSTD- 303.1 MONOLITHIC SLAB CONFIGUR |
| | ATION 20" TALL X 12"WIDE. |
| | |
| | 3)- SSTD- 203.3.2 MINIMUM EPOXY EMBED- |
| | MENT 6". |
| | |
| | 4)- SSTD- 205.8 PLANS DO NOT INDICATE |
| | ASSEMBLIES & BEAMS SPANNING OPENINGS. |
| | THERE ARE 3 CHOICES, PAGE 36/41 GIVE THE |
| | STEEL REQUIREMENTS, PAGE 41 IS THE BEAM/ |
| | LINTEL ASSEMBLY, USED COMMONLY IN THIS |
| | AREA. NOTE: PAGE 41 INDICATES A 16" BEAM |
| | ALL CELLS ARE GROUTED ABOVE THE LINTEL & |
| | THE AMOUNT OF STEEL REQUIRED FOR |
| | PLACEMENT IN THE LINTEL. |
| | |
| | 5)- SBC 1606.2.6.2 COMPONENTS & CLADDING |
| | THERE IS NO WINDOW BUCK DETAIL GIVING |
| | THE ATTACHMENT SCHEDULE FOR WINDOWS AND |
| | DOORS. |
| | |
| | 6)- TRUSS OR RAFTER ANCHOR: NO INFORMATI |
| | ON IS GIVEN FOR UPLIFT. THE MANUFACTURE |
| | MAKE ,MODEL, LATERAL LOADS ETC. |
| | |
| | 7)- DICCREPANCY: NORTH SIDE ELEVATION |
| | SHOWS NO OVERHANG ON THE SIDES OF THE |
| | BUILDING, ON THE ROOF FRAMING PLAN IT |
| | APPEARS THERE MAY BE APPROXIMATELY A |
| | 1"-0" OVERHANG? |
| | |
| | 8)- SBC AMEND 2111.6 WHERE EXTERIOR HOLL |
| | OW MASONRY UNITS BEAR ON A CONCRETE |
| | SURFACE, A 1 1/2" RECESS, OR OTHER |
| | APPROVED WATER-STOP ACCEPTED BY THE |
| | BUILDING OFFICIAL, SHALL BE PROVIDED TO |
| | PREVENT WATER INTRSION. |
| | |
| | 9)- SBC 1707.4 GLAZED OPENINGS ARE |
| | REQUIRED TO BE TESTED 10 SEC. LOAD TEST |
| | EQUAL TO 1.5 TIMES THE DESIGN PRESSURE. |
| | |
| | 10)- SBC AMEND 1606.4.1/1707.4.1 GLAZED |
| | OPENINGS, WINDOWS & DOORS ARE REQUIRED |
| | TO SHOW PRODUCT TESTING FOR LARGE MISSLE |
| | IMPACT TESTING EITHER SBCCI OR DADE |
| | COUNTY PRODUCT TESTING REPORTS ARE |
| | ACCEPTABLE. IF WINDOWS & DOORS DO NOT HA |
| | VE PRODUCT TESTING STORM SHUTTERS WILL |
| | BE REQUIRED WITH THIS TESTING REPORT. |
| | |
| | 11)- ROOFING: SBC 1503.3.2 ALL ROOFING |
| | SYSTEMS WILL BE TESTED FOR THE WIND ZONE |
| | THEY WILL BE USED IN, (110 MPH). |
| | |
| | 12)- SHOW PRODUCT TESTING FOR A FINISHED |
| | ROOFING SYSTEM 90 LB? IS THIS TO BE A |
| | MODIFIED TORCH DOWN SYSTEM? |
| | |
| | 13)- SBC 104.2.2 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION |
| | REQUIRED: |
| | A)- PLANS INDICATE THE 2X10 ARE TO SIT |
| | ABOUT 6" ABOVE THE EXISTING BEAM, |
| | WHAT IS TO HOLD THEM AT THIS |
| | HEIGTH AND HOW ARE THEY STRAPPED |
| | TO THE EXISTING BEAM, GIVE ADDI- |
| | TIONAL INFORMATION. |
| | B)- WALL REMOVAL: WHAT IS GOING TO |
| | HOLD UPTHE EXISTING RAFTERS? |
| | C)- IS THE CLOSET & BATH PART OF THIS |
| | REMODEL? |
| | D)- DISCREPANCIES: IN DIMENSIONS, |
| | EXISTING FLOOR SLAB VS. FLOOR |
| | LAT OUT VS. EXISTING EAST WALL? |
| | E)- MISSING INFORMATION INSULATION ON |
| | EXTERIOR WALLS |
| | F)- NO ELECTRICAL INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | 14)- MISSING: 1997 FL ENERGY CALCULATION |
| | |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | JIM WITMER |
| | (561) 659-8096 EX 8412 |
