Plan Review Details - Permit 01030199
Plan Review Stops For Permit 01030199
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2002-11-06 Cont ID  
Sent By btrobaug Date 2002-11-06 Time 10:34 Rev Time 0.50
Received By btrobaug Date 2002-11-06 Time 10:15 Sent To R
Notes
2002-11-06 00:00:00SPOKE WITH DON ARPIN(P.E.),TOLD HIM THE
 EC MUST COMPLY WITH 553-79(6)(A) FAC.
  
 SENT TO JULIO./WRT.
 ALSO HAD REVISIONS TO ELECTRICAL
 PLANS,PASSED,CALLED,UNDER "S".

Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2001-06-14 Cont ID  
Sent By dpalmer Date 2001-06-14 Time 21:01 Rev Time 0.00
Received By dpalmer Date 2001-06-14 Time 21:01 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2001-04-02 Cont ID  
Sent By dpalmer Date 2001-04-02 Time 19:02 Rev Time 0.00
Received By dpalmer Date 2001-04-02 Time 19:02 Sent To  
Notes
2001-04-02 00:00:00****************** UNSAT *************
  
 1)NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT AIC RATINGS FOR
 ALL NEW EQUIPMENT BEING INSTALLED.
 MAINS/PANELS/BREAKERS MUST BE RATED FOR
 THE AVAILABLE FAULT CURRENT PER 110-9.
  
 2) NOTE: PLEASE LIST THE REQ`D BATH(S)
 CIRCUIT(S) PER 210-11-C-3.
 MUST BE 20A AND #12AWG.
  
 3)NOTE: PLEASE NOTE GFI PROTECTION OF
 OUTLETS 6` FROM SINK IN TACK ROOM PER
 LOCAL AMENDMENT.210-8
  
 4)NOTE: PLEASE NOTE THAT PLAN ONLY SHOWS
 ONE DISCONNECT NEXT TO METERCAN.
  
 5)NOTE: PLEASE NOTETHAT ALL CIRCUITS
 FOR CABANA ARE SHOWN COMING FROM PANEL
 IN MAIN HOUSE? THIS IS NOT PERMITTED.
 225-31 NEC. ALSO PLEASE NOTE GROUNDING
 IS TO BE SHOWN AT DETACHED STRUCTURE
 PER 250-32 AND 250-50.
  
 6)NOTE: PLEASE NOTE THAT PLANS SHOW #8
 FROM DISC "B" TO PANEL "B" WHICH IS
 SHOWN AT 100A.#8 IS NOT RATED FOR 100A.
  
 7)NOTE: PLEASE NOTE PANEL"B" IS SHOWN AT
 100AMPS ANDHAS 142AMP LOAD????
 PLEASE CORRECT. PLEASE CORRELATE WIRE
 SIZE WITH OVERCURRENT PROTECTION
 PROVIDED.SIZE PER 310-16/ 310-15B-6
  
 8)NOTE: PLEASE NOTE SMOKE DETECTOR REQ`D
 INSIDE CABANA PER NFPA-72 2-2.1.1.1
  
 9)NOTE: PLEASE SHOW CONDUCTOR SIZES FROM
 MAIN DISCONNECT TO PANELS AND CONDUIT
 SIZES,EQUIPMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTORS PER
 215-5 AND 250-122.
  
 10)NOTE: PLEASE CLARIFY FEEDS COMING
 INTO METERCAN? PLANS SHOW IN TWO
 LOCATIONS 3-3/0`S IN A 2" CONDUIT? ARE
 THESE PARALELL CONDUITS? PLEASE CLARIFY.
  
 11)NOTE: PLEASE NOTE THAT NO LOAD
 CALCULATIONS WERE SUBMITTED. PLEASE
 SUBMIT LOAD CALCS PER 215-5.
  
 PLEASE SUBMIT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION
 FOR REVIEW. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS
 PLEASECALL.

Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2002-11-04 Cont ID  
Sent By btrobaug Date 2002-11-04 Time 09:26 Rev Time 0.00
Received By btrobaug Date 2002-11-04 Time 09:26 Sent To R
Notes
2002-11-04 00:00:00TO JULIO./WRT

Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2002-03-14 Cont ID  
Sent By pkrauss Date 2002-03-14 Time 12:12 Rev Time 0.35
Received By pkrauss Date 2002-03-14 Time 12:12 Sent To  
Notes
2002-03-14 00:00:00MECHANICAL PERMIT 02020450

Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2001-03-31 Cont ID  
Sent By jleech Date 2001-03-31 Time 14:08 Rev Time 0.50
Received By jleech Date 2001-03-31 Time 14:08 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2002-02-27 Cont ID  
Sent By kstevens Date 2002-02-27 Time 15:07 Rev Time 1.00
Received By kstevens Date 2002-02-27 Time 15:07 Sent To  
Notes
2002-02-27 00:00:00REVISION OK - MOVE W/C AND LAV BATH #2
 18"

Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2001-03-31 Cont ID  
Sent By jleech Date 2001-03-31 Time 14:08 Rev Time 0.33
Received By jleech Date 2001-03-31 Time 14:08 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop R ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No 9 Status F Date 2002-10-01 Cont ID  
Sent By btrobaug Date 2002-11-06 Time 12:06 Rev Time 1.00
Received By jgomez Date 2002-10-01 Time 15:18 Sent To  
Notes
2002-10-01 00:00:00PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
 1-SITE SPECIFIC PRODUCT APPROVAL INFOR-
 MATION SUBMITTED IS VERY CONFUSING:
 A)DOCUMENTS ARE SIGNED, SEALED AND DATED
 BY DIFFERENT ENGINEERS.
 WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WHAT?
 B)ENGINEERS' INFORMATION IS INCOMPLETE.
 MISSING INFORMATION AS REQUIRED BY
 CHAPTER 471 FLORIDA STATUTES.
 C)DON ARPIN IS AN ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER?
 SEE SUBMITTAL.
 D)SOME DOCUMENTS/DRAWINGS HAVE NOT ORIGI
 NAL SIGNATURE AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER
 471 FLORIDA STATUTES.
 E)SOME DOCUMENTS/DWGS HAVE THE INFORMATI
 ON FOR ONE ENGINEER, BUT IS SIGNED BY
 OTHER ENGINEER. WHY.
 F)SITE SPECIFIC INFORMATION DON'T HAVE
 THE ADDRESS OF THE JOB. CHECK THEM ALL
 G)PRODUCT APPROVALS DON'T MATCH PLANS.
 SEE SIZES AND TYPES SHOWN ON PLANS.
 H)DON ARPIN ENGINEER'S COVER LETTER IS
 NOT SPECIFIC AS TO WHAT IS BEING
 REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY HIM.
 I)GARAGE DOORS DON'T MATCH PRODUCT
 APPROVALS AND THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT
 SETS OF DRAWINGS. THERE IS ANOTHER ENG
 INEER. THERE IS NOT FILLED FORM FOR
 SITE SPECIFIC INSTALLATION SIGNED BY
 BOTH PROFESSIONALS.
 J)CUSTOM GLAZING PROTECTION DEVICES WITH
 OUT THE PRODUCT APPROVAL NEED TO PROVI
 DE THE CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
 METHOD AND INSTALLATION AFFIDAVIT.
 SEE CITY IMPLEMENTATION STANDARD FOR
 HURRICANE MISSILE IMPACT PROTECTION
 ATTACHED.

Review Stop R ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No 8 Status F Date 2002-04-08 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2002-04-08 Time 14:03 Rev Time 1.00
Received By jgomez Date 2002-04-08 Time 14:03 Sent To  
Notes
2002-04-08 00:00:00CHECKLIST:
 1-WALLS AND FENCES ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE
 SEPARATE PERMITS. SEE APPROVED PLANS
 FOR NOTES.
 2-PARTIAL SITE PLAN SUBMITTED SHOWING
 REVISED POOL AREA SURROUNDINGS NEED TO
 BE SIGNED, SEALED AND DATED AS REQ'D
 BY CHAPTER 471 FLORIDA STATUTES.
 3-PROVIDE COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
 FOR "SHOWER TENTS".
 SECTION 104.2.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO SBC
 1997 AND SEC. 1606 SBC 1997.

Review Stop R ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No 7 Status F Date 2002-03-21 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2002-03-21 Time 15:41 Rev Time 1.00
Received By jgomez Date 2002-03-15 Time 18:58 Sent To  
Notes
2002-03-15 00:00:00CHECKLIST:
 1-SITE SPECIFIC PRODUCT APPROVALS
 SUBMITTED ARE NOT SIGNED, SEALED AND
 DATED BY THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER OF
 RECORD. CONTRACTOR WAS TOLD ABOUT THIS
 ON PREVIOUS REVIEWS.
 2-ALSO, PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR
 DOORS AND WINDOWS ASSEMBLIES AS SHOWN
 ON ARCHITECTURAL PLANS.
 EG: THREE PANELS FRENCH DOORS AND
 WINDOWS MULLED TOGETHER.
 3-CONTRACTOR NEEDS TO UPDATE HIS LICENSE
 REGISTRATION WITH THE CITY OF WEST
 PALM BEACH.
 4-PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR ENTRY
 DOORS WITH SIDELITES SINGLE ASSEMBLY
 AS SHOWN ON ARCHITECTURAL PLANS.
 5-PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR GARAGE
 DOORS.
 6-ADDITIONAL FEES ARE DUE FOR MULTIPLE
 RESUBMITTALS (10% OF INITIAL PERMIT
 FEE).
  
 NOTE: REMEMBER ELEVATION CERTIFICATE
 WILL BE REQUIRED FOR BUILDINGS
 LOCATED ON FLOOD ZONE A5.

Review Stop R ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No 6 Status P Date 2002-02-26 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2002-02-26 Time 14:31 Rev Time 0.33
Received By jgomez Date 2002-02-26 Time 14:31 Sent To  
Notes
2002-02-26 00:00:00APPROVED WITH PROVISO:
 1-TRUSS DWGS ARE OK.
 2-PROVIDE ITEMS REQUESTED ON PROVISO
 DATED 7-20-01 PRIOR TO INSTALLATION IN
 ORDER TO AVOID CONFLICT OR DELAYS.
 3-PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR OVERHEAD
 GARAGE DOORS.

Review Stop R ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No 5 Status F Date 2002-02-08 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2002-02-08 Time 17:48 Rev Time 2.50
Received By jgomez Date 2002-02-08 Time 12:16 Sent To  
Notes
2002-02-08 00:00:00TRUSS DRAWINGS SECOND REVIEWFROM
 PREVIOUS CHECKLIST DATED 01-02-02:
 1-ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW ALL TRUSS
 DRAWINGS PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL. ENGINEER
 OF RECORD IS DON ARPIN NOT ALBERT A.
 GARGIULO. IF CHANGING ENGINEER, THEN
 FOLLOW CHAPTER 61G15-27 FROM FLORIDA
 BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS
 (PROCEDURE FOR ADOPTION OF ANOTHER'S
 WORK).
 2-TRUSS LAYOUT DOESN'T MATCH FRAMING
 PLAN SUBMITTED BY ENGINEER OF RECORD.
 APPROVED PLANS SHOW EXISTING ROOF AT
 MAIN HOUSE, WHILE TRUSS LAYOUT CALLS
 FOR NEW ROOF FRAMING.
 -ALSO, FRAMING AT GARAGE AREA DOESN'T
 MATCH EITHER.
 -REVISE ROOF FRAMING PLANS AS REQUIRED
 TO MATCH AND PROVIDE CORRESPONDING
 TRUSS ANCHOR SCHEDULE AND SPECS AS
 REQUIRED.
 3-PROVIDE ITEMS REQUESTED ON PROVISO
 DATED 7-20-01.
 4-PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR OVERHEAD
 GARAGE DOORS.
 5-COMMENTS ON PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED
 A)SITE SPECIFIC FORM IS NOT LEGIBLE.
 B)SITE SPECIFIC FORM TO BE SIGNED,SEALED
 AND DATED BY THE MANUFACTURER'S ENG'R
 AND BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD AS WELL.
 C)MANUFACTURER'S ENGINEER TO PROVIDE
 ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, DATE AND SEAL ON
 ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC
 RECORDS. CHAPTER 471 FLORIDA STATUTES.
 D)WHO'S ARCHITRAVE-DALE POSEY-ARCHITECT?
 HE HAS NOTHING TO DO IN THIS PROJECT,
 BUT HE IS BEING ADDRESSED TO IN ALL
 ENGINEERED TRUSSES. REVISE AS REQ'D.
  
 NOTE: RESUBMITTAL FEES WILL BE CHARGED.

Review Stop R ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2002-01-02 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2002-01-02 Time 15:33 Rev Time 1.00
Received By jgomez Date 2002-01-02 Time 15:33 Sent To  
Notes
2002-01-02 00:00:00TRUSS DRAWINGS CHECKLIST:
 1-ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW ALL TRUSS
 DRAWINGS PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL.
 2-CLARIFY WHY IS THERE ANOTHER ENGINEER
 CERTIFYING FOR THE STRUCTURAL
 CONNECTIONS. THE ENGINEER OF RECORD IS
 DON ARPIN, NOT ALBERT GARGIULO. SEE
 CHAPTER 471 FLORIDA STATUTES.
 3-TRUSS LAYOUT DOESN'T MATCH FRAMING
 PLANS SUBMITTED BY ENGINEER OF RECORD.
 APPROVED PLANS SHOW EXISTING ROOF AT
 MAIN HOUSE, WHILE TRUSS LAYOUT CALL
 FOR NEW ROOF FRAMING. ALSO, FRAMING
 PLAN AT GARAGE AREA DOESN'T MATCH.
 REVISE EITHER TRUSS DRAWINGS OR ENG'R
 PLANS AS REQUIRED AND PROVIDE COMPLETE
 ANCHOR SPECIFICATIONS AS REQUIRED.
 SEC. 104.2.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO SBC/97
 4-ALL ENGINEERED TRUSSES NEED ORIGINAL
 SIGNATURE AND DATE AS REQUIRED BY
 CHAPTER 471 FLORIDA STATUTES.
 5-UPDATE ALL GENERAL TRUSS DETAILS. USE
 ASCE 7-95 FOR 140MPH, NOT ASCE 7-93.
 6-THERE IS ONLY ONE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT FOR
 ENTIRE BUILDING (+/- 19'-6").
 SEE TABLE 1606.2A SBC 1997. TRUSSES
 ARE DESIGN USING DIFFERENT MEAN ROOFS.
 7-INDEX OF ENGINEERED TRUSSES DOESN'T
 MATCH TRUSS LAYOUT.
 8-ITEMS REQUESTED ON PROVISO DATED
 7-20-01 ARE NOT SUBMITTED YET. PROVIDE
 SUCH INFORMATION BEFORE INSTALLATION
 TO AVOID DELAYS OR CONFLICTS.

Review Stop R ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2001-07-20 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2001-07-20 Time 17:35 Rev Time 2.00
Received By jgomez Date 2001-07-20 Time 17:34 Sent To  
Notes
2001-07-20 00:00:00APPROVED WITH PROVISO:
 1-FLOOD ZONE A5. WILL NEED TO PROVIDE
 ELEVATION CERTIFICATE. 7.5' MINIMUM
 ELEVATION PER CHAPTER 12 OF CITY CODE.
 2-REVISE THE DESIGN CERTIFICATION FOR
 BUILDING CODE COMPLIANCE FORM:
 A)THE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT AND VELOCITY
 PRESSURE DON'T MATCH. SEE TABLE
 1606.2A OF SBC 1997.
 B)THE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT FOR MAIN HOUSE IS
 INCORRECT. MEAN ROOF HEIGHT SHALL BE
 TAKEN FROM THE AVEARAGE POINT OF THE
 HIGHEST ROOF OF THE HOUSE TO THE GRADE
 3-REVISE FRAMING DETAIL FOR OVAL WINDOW.
 NEED DIAGONAL STRUCTURAL BUCK IN ORDER
 TO INSTALL WINDOW AS PER PRODUCT
 APPROVAL. SEE PRODUCT APPROVAL.
 4-PRIOR TO INSTALLATION PROVIDE PRODUCT
 APPROVAL FOR:
 A)FRENCH DOORS WITH THREE PANELS AS
 SHOWN ON ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS.
 B)ENTRY DOOR WITH SIDELITES SINGLE
 ASSEMBLY AS SHOWN ON ARCHITECTURAL
 PLANS.

Review Stop R ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2001-07-09 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2001-07-07 Time 16:13 Rev Time 3.50
Received By jgomez Date 2001-07-07 Time 15:50 Sent To  
Notes
2001-07-07 00:00:00CHECKLIST:
 1-SURVEY AND ELEVATION CERTIFICATE DON'T
 MATCH. FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS DON'T
 MATCH. PROVIDE CURRENT SURVEY WITH
 CORRECT INFORMATION.
 -PROVIDE SURVEY SHOWING PROPOSED LAYOUT
 2-DESIGN CERTIFICATION FOR BUILDING CODE
 COMPLIANCE FORM IS INCORRECT. THE MEAN
 ROOF HEIGHT AND VELOCITY PRESSURE
 DON'T MATCH. SEE TABLE 1606.2A SBC/97.
 -THERE ARE TWO BUILDINGS TO BE
 CONSIDERED: THE CABANA AND THE MAIN
 HOUSE. THEREFORE, IT SHALL BE TWO
 SEPARATE FORMS WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE
 MEAN ROOF HEIGHT.
 3-PROVIDE STRUCTURAL BUCK DETAIL USING
 2X4 BUCK AS REQUIRED BY THE PRODUCT
 APPROVALS FOR DOORS AND WINDOWS.
 4-REVISE FRAMING DETAIL FOR INSTALLATION
 OF OVAL WINDOW. SEE PRODUCT APPROVAL.
 5-PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR:
 -METAL ROOF SYSTEM.
 -TACK ROOM DOUBLE DOORS. OR REVISE
 DRAWINGS SHOWING OVERHEAD DOORS.
 -FRENCH DOORS AS SHOWN ON ARCHITECTURAL
 DRAWINGS. (THREE PANELS)
 -ENTRY DOOR WITH SIDELITES ASSEMBLY.
 -SINGLE SWING DOOR (GARAGE SIDE DOOR).
 6-OWNER TO SIGN AND DATE THE ENERGY
 CALCULATIONS (CABANA AND MAIN HOUSE).
 7-NEED TO FILE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT.

Review Stop R ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2001-04-07 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2001-04-07 Time 15:00 Rev Time 4.50
Received By jgomez Date 2001-04-06 Time 18:44 Sent To  
Notes
2001-04-07 00:00:00CHECKLIST:
 1-HOUSE IS LOCATED ON FLOOD ZONE A5,
 THEREFORE ENTIRE FINISH FLOOR MUST BE
 RAISED TO 6" ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD
 ELEVATION (7'-0"). CHAPTER 12 OF CITY
 CODE. SEE ATTACHED COPY.
 2-BRING DRAWINGS TO PALM BEACH COUNTY
 TO PAY IMPACT FEES. BRING STAMPED
 DRAWINGS AND RECEIPT.
 3-PROVIDE SURVEY WITH NEW LAYOUT AND
 SHOWING THE FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS.
 4-PROVIDE COMPLETE DESIGN CERTIFICATION
 FOR BUILDING CODE COMPLIANCE FORM.
 SEE ATTACHED COPY.
 5-STEPS BY ENTRY AREA TO COMPLY WITH
 SECTION 1007.3 SBC 1997.
 6-PROVIDE COMPLETE SECTION/DETAILS FOR
 CONSTRUCTION OF CHIMNEYS. SECTION
 104.2.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO SBC 1997.
 7-SPECIFY THE DESIGN PRESSURES THAT
 WERE CALCULATED AT EXTERIOR OPENINGS.
 CHAPTER 16 SBC 1997.
 8-ROOF FRAMING PLAN: SPECIFY THE UPLIFT
 LOADS CALCULATED AND PROVIDE COMPLETE
 ANCHOR SCHEDULE. SECTION 104.2.2 OF
 CITY AMENDMENTS TO SBC 1997.
 9-SPECIFY FASTENING OF ROOF SHEATHING AT
 ENTRY PERGOLA AND REAR OUTDOOR FLORIDA
 ROOM. CHAPTER 16 SBC 1997.
 10-PROVIDE FRAMING DETAIL FOR
 INSTALLATION OF OVAL WINDOW.
 SECTION 104.2.2 CITY AMENDMENTS.
 11-PROVIDE GARAGE DOORS BUCK DETAILS.
 SECTION 104.2.2 CITY AMENDMENTS.
 12-PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR:
 -ENTRY DOOR WITH SIDELITES AND SIZE AS
 SPECIFIED ON PLANS. (3'-6").
 -OVAL WINDOWS.
 -GARAGE DOORS.
 -TACK ROOM DOUBLE DOORS.
 -METAL ROOF SYSTEM.
 -FLAT ROOF SYSTEM.
 -FIREPLACES SPECS WITH UL LISTING.
 -FRENCH DOORS ASSEMBLIES AS SHOWN ON
 PLANS.
 -SINGLE DOORS.
 13-OWNER TO SIGN AND DATE THE ENERGY
 CALCULATIONS. (CABANA AND MAIN HOUSE).
 14-CONTRACTOR TO UPDATE INSURANCE. IT
 EXPIRED 3-22-01.
 15-SEE PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AND
 PLEASE RETURN REVIEWED SET AFTER THE
 CORRECTIONS ARE DONE TO THE ORIGINAL
 DRAWINGS IN ORDER TO EXPEDITE THE
 REVIEW PROCESS.
 16-SEE COMMENTS BY ZONING AND THE OTHER
 TRADES.
  
  
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL
 JULIO GOMEZ AT 659-8096 EXT. 8232.

Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2002-04-08 Cont ID  
Sent By sgraham Date 2002-04-08 Time 15:35 Rev Time 0.25
Received By sgraham Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2002-04-08 00:00:00NEED SEPARATE PERMIT FOR WALLS,FENCES
 SUBMIT SURVEY,COMPLETE PLANS & EASEMENT
 RELEASE.

Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2001-06-13 Cont ID  
Sent By sgraham Date 2001-03-20 Time 08:14 Rev Time 0.25
Received By sgraham Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2001-03-20 00:00:00WALL CAN NOT BE ATTACHED TO BLDG
 MUST MEET LANDSCAPE CODE
 MUST MEET HEIGHT ON WALL
 EASEMENT RELEASE REQUIRED
 MUST MEET SETBACK REQUIREMENTS


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved