| Plan Review Stops For Permit 01030199 |
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2002-11-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2002-11-06 |
Time |
10:34 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2002-11-06 |
Time |
10:15 |
Sent To |
R |
|
| Notes |
| 2002-11-06 00:00:00 | SPOKE WITH DON ARPIN(P.E.),TOLD HIM THE | | | EC MUST COMPLY WITH 553-79(6)(A) FAC. | | | | | | SENT TO JULIO./WRT. | | | ALSO HAD REVISIONS TO ELECTRICAL | | | PLANS,PASSED,CALLED,UNDER "S". |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2001-06-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2001-06-14 |
Time |
21:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2001-06-14 |
Time |
21:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2001-04-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2001-04-02 |
Time |
19:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2001-04-02 |
Time |
19:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2001-04-02 00:00:00 | ****************** UNSAT ************* | | | | | | 1)NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT AIC RATINGS FOR | | | ALL NEW EQUIPMENT BEING INSTALLED. | | | MAINS/PANELS/BREAKERS MUST BE RATED FOR | | | THE AVAILABLE FAULT CURRENT PER 110-9. | | | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE LIST THE REQ`D BATH(S) | | | CIRCUIT(S) PER 210-11-C-3. | | | MUST BE 20A AND #12AWG. | | | | | | 3)NOTE: PLEASE NOTE GFI PROTECTION OF | | | OUTLETS 6` FROM SINK IN TACK ROOM PER | | | LOCAL AMENDMENT.210-8 | | | | | | 4)NOTE: PLEASE NOTE THAT PLAN ONLY SHOWS | | | ONE DISCONNECT NEXT TO METERCAN. | | | | | | 5)NOTE: PLEASE NOTETHAT ALL CIRCUITS | | | FOR CABANA ARE SHOWN COMING FROM PANEL | | | IN MAIN HOUSE? THIS IS NOT PERMITTED. | | | 225-31 NEC. ALSO PLEASE NOTE GROUNDING | | | IS TO BE SHOWN AT DETACHED STRUCTURE | | | PER 250-32 AND 250-50. | | | | | | 6)NOTE: PLEASE NOTE THAT PLANS SHOW #8 | | | FROM DISC "B" TO PANEL "B" WHICH IS | | | SHOWN AT 100A.#8 IS NOT RATED FOR 100A. | | | | | | 7)NOTE: PLEASE NOTE PANEL"B" IS SHOWN AT | | | 100AMPS ANDHAS 142AMP LOAD???? | | | PLEASE CORRECT. PLEASE CORRELATE WIRE | | | SIZE WITH OVERCURRENT PROTECTION | | | PROVIDED.SIZE PER 310-16/ 310-15B-6 | | | | | | 8)NOTE: PLEASE NOTE SMOKE DETECTOR REQ`D | | | INSIDE CABANA PER NFPA-72 2-2.1.1.1 | | | | | | 9)NOTE: PLEASE SHOW CONDUCTOR SIZES FROM | | | MAIN DISCONNECT TO PANELS AND CONDUIT | | | SIZES,EQUIPMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTORS PER | | | 215-5 AND 250-122. | | | | | | 10)NOTE: PLEASE CLARIFY FEEDS COMING | | | INTO METERCAN? PLANS SHOW IN TWO | | | LOCATIONS 3-3/0`S IN A 2" CONDUIT? ARE | | | THESE PARALELL CONDUITS? PLEASE CLARIFY. | | | | | | 11)NOTE: PLEASE NOTE THAT NO LOAD | | | CALCULATIONS WERE SUBMITTED. PLEASE | | | SUBMIT LOAD CALCS PER 215-5. | | | | | | PLEASE SUBMIT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION | | | FOR REVIEW. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS | | | PLEASECALL. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2002-11-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2002-11-04 |
Time |
09:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2002-11-04 |
Time |
09:26 |
Sent To |
R |
|
| Notes |
| 2002-11-04 00:00:00 | TO JULIO./WRT |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2002-03-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pkrauss |
Date |
2002-03-14 |
Time |
12:12 |
Rev Time |
0.35 |
| Received By |
pkrauss |
Date |
2002-03-14 |
Time |
12:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2002-03-14 00:00:00 | MECHANICAL PERMIT 02020450 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2001-03-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleech |
Date |
2001-03-31 |
Time |
14:08 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
jleech |
Date |
2001-03-31 |
Time |
14:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2002-02-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2002-02-27 |
Time |
15:07 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2002-02-27 |
Time |
15:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2002-02-27 00:00:00 | REVISION OK - MOVE W/C AND LAV BATH #2 | | | 18" |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2001-03-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleech |
Date |
2001-03-31 |
Time |
14:08 |
Rev Time |
0.33 |
| Received By |
jleech |
Date |
2001-03-31 |
Time |
14:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
| Rev No |
9 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2002-10-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2002-11-06 |
Time |
12:06 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2002-10-01 |
Time |
15:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2002-10-01 00:00:00 | PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: | | | 1-SITE SPECIFIC PRODUCT APPROVAL INFOR- | | | MATION SUBMITTED IS VERY CONFUSING: | | | A)DOCUMENTS ARE SIGNED, SEALED AND DATED | | | BY DIFFERENT ENGINEERS. | | | WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WHAT? | | | B)ENGINEERS' INFORMATION IS INCOMPLETE. | | | MISSING INFORMATION AS REQUIRED BY | | | CHAPTER 471 FLORIDA STATUTES. | | | C)DON ARPIN IS AN ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER? | | | SEE SUBMITTAL. | | | D)SOME DOCUMENTS/DRAWINGS HAVE NOT ORIGI | | | NAL SIGNATURE AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER | | | 471 FLORIDA STATUTES. | | | E)SOME DOCUMENTS/DWGS HAVE THE INFORMATI | | | ON FOR ONE ENGINEER, BUT IS SIGNED BY | | | OTHER ENGINEER. WHY. | | | F)SITE SPECIFIC INFORMATION DON'T HAVE | | | THE ADDRESS OF THE JOB. CHECK THEM ALL | | | G)PRODUCT APPROVALS DON'T MATCH PLANS. | | | SEE SIZES AND TYPES SHOWN ON PLANS. | | | H)DON ARPIN ENGINEER'S COVER LETTER IS | | | NOT SPECIFIC AS TO WHAT IS BEING | | | REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY HIM. | | | I)GARAGE DOORS DON'T MATCH PRODUCT | | | APPROVALS AND THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT | | | SETS OF DRAWINGS. THERE IS ANOTHER ENG | | | INEER. THERE IS NOT FILLED FORM FOR | | | SITE SPECIFIC INSTALLATION SIGNED BY | | | BOTH PROFESSIONALS. | | | J)CUSTOM GLAZING PROTECTION DEVICES WITH | | | OUT THE PRODUCT APPROVAL NEED TO PROVI | | | DE THE CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE | | | METHOD AND INSTALLATION AFFIDAVIT. | | | SEE CITY IMPLEMENTATION STANDARD FOR | | | HURRICANE MISSILE IMPACT PROTECTION | | | ATTACHED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
| Rev No |
8 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2002-04-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2002-04-08 |
Time |
14:03 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2002-04-08 |
Time |
14:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2002-04-08 00:00:00 | CHECKLIST: | | | 1-WALLS AND FENCES ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE | | | SEPARATE PERMITS. SEE APPROVED PLANS | | | FOR NOTES. | | | 2-PARTIAL SITE PLAN SUBMITTED SHOWING | | | REVISED POOL AREA SURROUNDINGS NEED TO | | | BE SIGNED, SEALED AND DATED AS REQ'D | | | BY CHAPTER 471 FLORIDA STATUTES. | | | 3-PROVIDE COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION DETAILS | | | FOR "SHOWER TENTS". | | | SECTION 104.2.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO SBC | | | 1997 AND SEC. 1606 SBC 1997. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2002-03-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2002-03-21 |
Time |
15:41 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2002-03-15 |
Time |
18:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2002-03-15 00:00:00 | CHECKLIST: | | | 1-SITE SPECIFIC PRODUCT APPROVALS | | | SUBMITTED ARE NOT SIGNED, SEALED AND | | | DATED BY THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER OF | | | RECORD. CONTRACTOR WAS TOLD ABOUT THIS | | | ON PREVIOUS REVIEWS. | | | 2-ALSO, PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR | | | DOORS AND WINDOWS ASSEMBLIES AS SHOWN | | | ON ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. | | | EG: THREE PANELS FRENCH DOORS AND | | | WINDOWS MULLED TOGETHER. | | | 3-CONTRACTOR NEEDS TO UPDATE HIS LICENSE | | | REGISTRATION WITH THE CITY OF WEST | | | PALM BEACH. | | | 4-PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR ENTRY | | | DOORS WITH SIDELITES SINGLE ASSEMBLY | | | AS SHOWN ON ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. | | | 5-PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR GARAGE | | | DOORS. | | | 6-ADDITIONAL FEES ARE DUE FOR MULTIPLE | | | RESUBMITTALS (10% OF INITIAL PERMIT | | | FEE). | | | | | | NOTE: REMEMBER ELEVATION CERTIFICATE | | | WILL BE REQUIRED FOR BUILDINGS | | | LOCATED ON FLOOD ZONE A5. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2002-02-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2002-02-26 |
Time |
14:31 |
Rev Time |
0.33 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2002-02-26 |
Time |
14:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2002-02-26 00:00:00 | APPROVED WITH PROVISO: | | | 1-TRUSS DWGS ARE OK. | | | 2-PROVIDE ITEMS REQUESTED ON PROVISO | | | DATED 7-20-01 PRIOR TO INSTALLATION IN | | | ORDER TO AVOID CONFLICT OR DELAYS. | | | 3-PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR OVERHEAD | | | GARAGE DOORS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2002-02-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2002-02-08 |
Time |
17:48 |
Rev Time |
2.50 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2002-02-08 |
Time |
12:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2002-02-08 00:00:00 | TRUSS DRAWINGS SECOND REVIEWFROM | | | PREVIOUS CHECKLIST DATED 01-02-02: | | | 1-ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW ALL TRUSS | | | DRAWINGS PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL. ENGINEER | | | OF RECORD IS DON ARPIN NOT ALBERT A. | | | GARGIULO. IF CHANGING ENGINEER, THEN | | | FOLLOW CHAPTER 61G15-27 FROM FLORIDA | | | BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS | | | (PROCEDURE FOR ADOPTION OF ANOTHER'S | | | WORK). | | | 2-TRUSS LAYOUT DOESN'T MATCH FRAMING | | | PLAN SUBMITTED BY ENGINEER OF RECORD. | | | APPROVED PLANS SHOW EXISTING ROOF AT | | | MAIN HOUSE, WHILE TRUSS LAYOUT CALLS | | | FOR NEW ROOF FRAMING. | | | -ALSO, FRAMING AT GARAGE AREA DOESN'T | | | MATCH EITHER. | | | -REVISE ROOF FRAMING PLANS AS REQUIRED | | | TO MATCH AND PROVIDE CORRESPONDING | | | TRUSS ANCHOR SCHEDULE AND SPECS AS | | | REQUIRED. | | | 3-PROVIDE ITEMS REQUESTED ON PROVISO | | | DATED 7-20-01. | | | 4-PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR OVERHEAD | | | GARAGE DOORS. | | | 5-COMMENTS ON PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED | | | A)SITE SPECIFIC FORM IS NOT LEGIBLE. | | | B)SITE SPECIFIC FORM TO BE SIGNED,SEALED | | | AND DATED BY THE MANUFACTURER'S ENG'R | | | AND BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD AS WELL. | | | C)MANUFACTURER'S ENGINEER TO PROVIDE | | | ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, DATE AND SEAL ON | | | ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC | | | RECORDS. CHAPTER 471 FLORIDA STATUTES. | | | D)WHO'S ARCHITRAVE-DALE POSEY-ARCHITECT? | | | HE HAS NOTHING TO DO IN THIS PROJECT, | | | BUT HE IS BEING ADDRESSED TO IN ALL | | | ENGINEERED TRUSSES. REVISE AS REQ'D. | | | | | | NOTE: RESUBMITTAL FEES WILL BE CHARGED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2002-01-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2002-01-02 |
Time |
15:33 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2002-01-02 |
Time |
15:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2002-01-02 00:00:00 | TRUSS DRAWINGS CHECKLIST: | | | 1-ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW ALL TRUSS | | | DRAWINGS PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL. | | | 2-CLARIFY WHY IS THERE ANOTHER ENGINEER | | | CERTIFYING FOR THE STRUCTURAL | | | CONNECTIONS. THE ENGINEER OF RECORD IS | | | DON ARPIN, NOT ALBERT GARGIULO. SEE | | | CHAPTER 471 FLORIDA STATUTES. | | | 3-TRUSS LAYOUT DOESN'T MATCH FRAMING | | | PLANS SUBMITTED BY ENGINEER OF RECORD. | | | APPROVED PLANS SHOW EXISTING ROOF AT | | | MAIN HOUSE, WHILE TRUSS LAYOUT CALL | | | FOR NEW ROOF FRAMING. ALSO, FRAMING | | | PLAN AT GARAGE AREA DOESN'T MATCH. | | | REVISE EITHER TRUSS DRAWINGS OR ENG'R | | | PLANS AS REQUIRED AND PROVIDE COMPLETE | | | ANCHOR SPECIFICATIONS AS REQUIRED. | | | SEC. 104.2.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO SBC/97 | | | 4-ALL ENGINEERED TRUSSES NEED ORIGINAL | | | SIGNATURE AND DATE AS REQUIRED BY | | | CHAPTER 471 FLORIDA STATUTES. | | | 5-UPDATE ALL GENERAL TRUSS DETAILS. USE | | | ASCE 7-95 FOR 140MPH, NOT ASCE 7-93. | | | 6-THERE IS ONLY ONE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT FOR | | | ENTIRE BUILDING (+/- 19'-6"). | | | SEE TABLE 1606.2A SBC 1997. TRUSSES | | | ARE DESIGN USING DIFFERENT MEAN ROOFS. | | | 7-INDEX OF ENGINEERED TRUSSES DOESN'T | | | MATCH TRUSS LAYOUT. | | | 8-ITEMS REQUESTED ON PROVISO DATED | | | 7-20-01 ARE NOT SUBMITTED YET. PROVIDE | | | SUCH INFORMATION BEFORE INSTALLATION | | | TO AVOID DELAYS OR CONFLICTS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2001-07-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2001-07-20 |
Time |
17:35 |
Rev Time |
2.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2001-07-20 |
Time |
17:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2001-07-20 00:00:00 | APPROVED WITH PROVISO: | | | 1-FLOOD ZONE A5. WILL NEED TO PROVIDE | | | ELEVATION CERTIFICATE. 7.5' MINIMUM | | | ELEVATION PER CHAPTER 12 OF CITY CODE. | | | 2-REVISE THE DESIGN CERTIFICATION FOR | | | BUILDING CODE COMPLIANCE FORM: | | | A)THE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT AND VELOCITY | | | PRESSURE DON'T MATCH. SEE TABLE | | | 1606.2A OF SBC 1997. | | | B)THE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT FOR MAIN HOUSE IS | | | INCORRECT. MEAN ROOF HEIGHT SHALL BE | | | TAKEN FROM THE AVEARAGE POINT OF THE | | | HIGHEST ROOF OF THE HOUSE TO THE GRADE | | | 3-REVISE FRAMING DETAIL FOR OVAL WINDOW. | | | NEED DIAGONAL STRUCTURAL BUCK IN ORDER | | | TO INSTALL WINDOW AS PER PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL. SEE PRODUCT APPROVAL. | | | 4-PRIOR TO INSTALLATION PROVIDE PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL FOR: | | | A)FRENCH DOORS WITH THREE PANELS AS | | | SHOWN ON ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. | | | B)ENTRY DOOR WITH SIDELITES SINGLE | | | ASSEMBLY AS SHOWN ON ARCHITECTURAL | | | PLANS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2001-07-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2001-07-07 |
Time |
16:13 |
Rev Time |
3.50 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2001-07-07 |
Time |
15:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2001-07-07 00:00:00 | CHECKLIST: | | | 1-SURVEY AND ELEVATION CERTIFICATE DON'T | | | MATCH. FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS DON'T | | | MATCH. PROVIDE CURRENT SURVEY WITH | | | CORRECT INFORMATION. | | | -PROVIDE SURVEY SHOWING PROPOSED LAYOUT | | | 2-DESIGN CERTIFICATION FOR BUILDING CODE | | | COMPLIANCE FORM IS INCORRECT. THE MEAN | | | ROOF HEIGHT AND VELOCITY PRESSURE | | | DON'T MATCH. SEE TABLE 1606.2A SBC/97. | | | -THERE ARE TWO BUILDINGS TO BE | | | CONSIDERED: THE CABANA AND THE MAIN | | | HOUSE. THEREFORE, IT SHALL BE TWO | | | SEPARATE FORMS WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE | | | MEAN ROOF HEIGHT. | | | 3-PROVIDE STRUCTURAL BUCK DETAIL USING | | | 2X4 BUCK AS REQUIRED BY THE PRODUCT | | | APPROVALS FOR DOORS AND WINDOWS. | | | 4-REVISE FRAMING DETAIL FOR INSTALLATION | | | OF OVAL WINDOW. SEE PRODUCT APPROVAL. | | | 5-PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR: | | | -METAL ROOF SYSTEM. | | | -TACK ROOM DOUBLE DOORS. OR REVISE | | | DRAWINGS SHOWING OVERHEAD DOORS. | | | -FRENCH DOORS AS SHOWN ON ARCHITECTURAL | | | DRAWINGS. (THREE PANELS) | | | -ENTRY DOOR WITH SIDELITES ASSEMBLY. | | | -SINGLE SWING DOOR (GARAGE SIDE DOOR). | | | 6-OWNER TO SIGN AND DATE THE ENERGY | | | CALCULATIONS (CABANA AND MAIN HOUSE). | | | 7-NEED TO FILE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2001-04-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2001-04-07 |
Time |
15:00 |
Rev Time |
4.50 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2001-04-06 |
Time |
18:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2001-04-07 00:00:00 | CHECKLIST: | | | 1-HOUSE IS LOCATED ON FLOOD ZONE A5, | | | THEREFORE ENTIRE FINISH FLOOR MUST BE | | | RAISED TO 6" ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD | | | ELEVATION (7'-0"). CHAPTER 12 OF CITY | | | CODE. SEE ATTACHED COPY. | | | 2-BRING DRAWINGS TO PALM BEACH COUNTY | | | TO PAY IMPACT FEES. BRING STAMPED | | | DRAWINGS AND RECEIPT. | | | 3-PROVIDE SURVEY WITH NEW LAYOUT AND | | | SHOWING THE FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS. | | | 4-PROVIDE COMPLETE DESIGN CERTIFICATION | | | FOR BUILDING CODE COMPLIANCE FORM. | | | SEE ATTACHED COPY. | | | 5-STEPS BY ENTRY AREA TO COMPLY WITH | | | SECTION 1007.3 SBC 1997. | | | 6-PROVIDE COMPLETE SECTION/DETAILS FOR | | | CONSTRUCTION OF CHIMNEYS. SECTION | | | 104.2.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO SBC 1997. | | | 7-SPECIFY THE DESIGN PRESSURES THAT | | | WERE CALCULATED AT EXTERIOR OPENINGS. | | | CHAPTER 16 SBC 1997. | | | 8-ROOF FRAMING PLAN: SPECIFY THE UPLIFT | | | LOADS CALCULATED AND PROVIDE COMPLETE | | | ANCHOR SCHEDULE. SECTION 104.2.2 OF | | | CITY AMENDMENTS TO SBC 1997. | | | 9-SPECIFY FASTENING OF ROOF SHEATHING AT | | | ENTRY PERGOLA AND REAR OUTDOOR FLORIDA | | | ROOM. CHAPTER 16 SBC 1997. | | | 10-PROVIDE FRAMING DETAIL FOR | | | INSTALLATION OF OVAL WINDOW. | | | SECTION 104.2.2 CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | 11-PROVIDE GARAGE DOORS BUCK DETAILS. | | | SECTION 104.2.2 CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | 12-PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR: | | | -ENTRY DOOR WITH SIDELITES AND SIZE AS | | | SPECIFIED ON PLANS. (3'-6"). | | | -OVAL WINDOWS. | | | -GARAGE DOORS. | | | -TACK ROOM DOUBLE DOORS. | | | -METAL ROOF SYSTEM. | | | -FLAT ROOF SYSTEM. | | | -FIREPLACES SPECS WITH UL LISTING. | | | -FRENCH DOORS ASSEMBLIES AS SHOWN ON | | | PLANS. | | | -SINGLE DOORS. | | | 13-OWNER TO SIGN AND DATE THE ENERGY | | | CALCULATIONS. (CABANA AND MAIN HOUSE). | | | 14-CONTRACTOR TO UPDATE INSURANCE. IT | | | EXPIRED 3-22-01. | | | 15-SEE PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AND | | | PLEASE RETURN REVIEWED SET AFTER THE | | | CORRECTIONS ARE DONE TO THE ORIGINAL | | | DRAWINGS IN ORDER TO EXPEDITE THE | | | REVIEW PROCESS. | | | 16-SEE COMMENTS BY ZONING AND THE OTHER | | | TRADES. | | | | | | | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL | | | JULIO GOMEZ AT 659-8096 EXT. 8232. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2002-04-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
sgraham |
Date |
2002-04-08 |
Time |
15:35 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
| Received By |
sgraham |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2002-04-08 00:00:00 | NEED SEPARATE PERMIT FOR WALLS,FENCES | | | SUBMIT SURVEY,COMPLETE PLANS & EASEMENT | | | RELEASE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2001-06-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
sgraham |
Date |
2001-03-20 |
Time |
08:14 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
| Received By |
sgraham |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2001-03-20 00:00:00 | WALL CAN NOT BE ATTACHED TO BLDG | | | MUST MEET LANDSCAPE CODE | | | MUST MEET HEIGHT ON WALL | | | EASEMENT RELEASE REQUIRED | | | MUST MEET SETBACK REQUIREMENTS |
|
|