| Plan Review Stops For Permit 00091035 |
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2000-11-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2000-11-22 |
Time |
08:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2000-11-22 |
Time |
08:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2001-05-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
hmoser |
Date |
2001-05-31 |
Time |
17:53 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
hmoser |
Date |
2001-05-31 |
Time |
17:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2001-05-31 00:00:00 | REVISON COMPLETE IN BIN I |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2000-10-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleech |
Date |
2000-10-07 |
Time |
14:46 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
jleech |
Date |
2000-10-07 |
Time |
14:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2000-11-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleech |
Date |
2000-11-22 |
Time |
09:53 |
Rev Time |
0.33 |
| Received By |
jleech |
Date |
2000-11-22 |
Time |
09:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2000-09-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tlarge |
Date |
2000-09-28 |
Time |
07:35 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
tlarge |
Date |
2000-09-28 |
Time |
07:35 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2001-01-08 00:00:00 | 1)SHT.A-1-NOTE #7-SHOWER HEADS SHALL BE | | | LIMITED TO A MAX.OF 2.5GPM PER F.E.C. | | | SEC.612.1.ABC.2.4. | | | | | | 2)DRY VENTS NOT PERMITTED PER SPC SEC. | | | 906.2.1. | | | | | | 3)LOCATION OF FIXTURES SHALL NOT INTER- | | | FERE W/THE OPERATION OF DOORS,WINDOWS, | | | ETC.PER SPC SEC.404.2.SEE M.B.,POWDER | | | ROOM AND CABANA BATH. | | | | | | 4)PLEASE PUT CALCULATIONS FOR COMBUSTION | | | AIR ON THE PLANS,NOT ON THE MANUF.SHEETS | | | CALCULATIONS SHALL BE DONE BY THE DESIGN | | | PROFESSIONAL.COUNTYWIDE AMENDMENTS TO | | | SPC SEC.104.2.3. | | | | | | CALL 561-659-8096,EXT.8377 IF YOU HAVE | | | QUESTIONS. | | | TIMOTHY LARGE | | | PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
| Rev No |
9 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2002-07-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2002-07-31 |
Time |
17:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2002-07-31 |
Time |
17:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2002-07-31 00:00:00 | BUTT GLAZING ENGINEERED ASSEMBLY. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
| Rev No |
8 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2002-07-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2002-07-25 |
Time |
18:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2002-07-25 |
Time |
18:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2002-07-25 00:00:00 | BUTT GLAZING ASSEMBLY: | | | A)ENGINEER NEEDS TO PROVIDE COMPLETE | | | ENGINEERED ANALYSIS FOR THE COMPLETE | | | SITE SPECIFIC ASSEMBLY AS SHOWN ON THE | | | ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. SEE SECTIONS | | | 2406.1 FOR DEFLECTION CALCULATIONS AND | | | SECTION 2406.2 FOR INFORMATION REQ'D | | | TO BE SUBMITTED BY THE ENGINEER. | | | B)ENGINEER TO PROVIDE COMPLETE SPECS FOR | | | SILICONE TO BE USED INCLUDING AT SIDE | | | WHERE GLASS IS BUTT TOGETHER. | | | C)THICKNESS OF GLASS SPECIFIED BY THE | | | ENGINEER DOESN'T MATCH THICKNESS SHOWN | | | ON PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR KDI 2000 FIXED | | | GLASS IMPACT WINDOW. | | | D)PROVIDE COPIES OF APPROVED DRAWINGS | | | FOR KDI 2000 FIXED GLASS IMPACT WINDOW | | | | | | REMAINDER: | | | ARCHITECT TO REVIEW ASSEMBLY PRIOR TO | | | SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | | | | SUGGESTION: | | | SEE SITE SPECIFIC ENGINEERING PACKAGE | | | SUBMITTED FOR ENTRY DOOR AS A SAMPLE OF | | | INFORMATION REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2002-07-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2002-07-19 |
Time |
13:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2002-07-19 |
Time |
13:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2002-07-19 00:00:00 | CHECKLIST: | | | 1-BUTT GLAZING ASSEMBLY: | | | A)INFORMATION SUBMITTED DOESN'T SATISFY | | | REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 2406.2 SBC 1997 | | | AS REQUESTED ON PREVIOUS CHECKLIST. | | | **"DETAILED SHOP DRAWINGS,SPECIFICATIONS | | | AND RATIONAL ANALYSIS AND/OR TEST DATA | | | ASSURING SAFE PERFORMANCE FOR THE | | | SPECIFIC INSTALLATION SHALL BE | | | PREPARED BY ENGINEERS EXPERIENCED IN | | | THIS WORK AND SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR | | | AND RECEIVE, IF WARRANTED, FORMAL | | | APPROVAL BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL." | | | B)INFORMATION SUBMITTED IS CROSS | | | MATCHING TWO DIFFERENT CODES STANDARD | | | BUILDING CODE AND FLORIDA BUILDING | | | CODE. ALSO, NEED TO SPECIFY THE YEAR | | | OF THE CODE USED. | | | C)DESIGN PRESSURES SPECIFIED DON'T MATCH | | | THE DESIGN PRESSURES CALCULATED BY THE | | | ARCHITECT. | | | D)MEAN ROOF HEIGHT IS INCORRECT. ENG'R | | | NEEDS TO SEE ARCHITECT'S PLANS TO | | | PROPERLY DESIGN SITE SPECIFIC ASSEMBLY | | | E)WHERE IS THE ATTACHED SPECIFICATION | | | MENTIONED ON ENGINEER LETTER? | | | | | | 2-SUBMITTED PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR FIXED | | | WINDOWS IS FOR RECTANGULAR WINDOWS NOT | | | FOR ARCHED WINDOWS. THIS PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL WAS ALREADY SUBMITTED FOR THE | | | RECTANGULAR WINDOWS AND IT WAS BY PGT | | | WINDOWS NOT BY K.D WINDOWS. CLARIFY, | | | WHICH ONE WAS INSTALLED. | | | | | | 3-ARCHITECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVE SITE | | | SPECIFIC ASSEMBLY PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | NOTE: PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR FRENCH DOORS | | | WITH SIDELITES IS OK. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2002-06-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2002-06-03 |
Time |
10:57 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2002-06-03 |
Time |
10:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2002-06-03 00:00:00 | 1-THE FOLLOWING PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE | | | NEVER SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW: | | | A)FRENCH DOORS WITH SIDELITES SINGLE | | | ASSEMBLY AS SHOWN ON PLANS. | | | B)ARCHED WINDOWS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. | | | C)BUTT GLAZING ASSEMBLY AS SHOWN ON | | | PLANS. | | | **NOTE: | | | PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION BY | | | SPECIALTY ENGINEER AS REQUIRED BY | | | SECTION 2406.2 SBC 1997. | | | **REMAINDER: | | | ARCHITECT OF RECORD TO REVIEW THEM AS | | | DONE WITH SITE SPECIFIC PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL FOR ENTRY DOOR ASSEMBLY. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2002-05-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2002-05-31 |
Time |
16:50 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2002-05-31 |
Time |
16:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2002-05-31 00:00:00 | THE FOLLOWING ITEMS REQUESTED ON PROVISO | | | DATED 11-29-00 WERE NEVER SUBMITTED FOR | | | REVIEW: | | | A) |
|
|
| Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2002-05-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2002-05-03 |
Time |
13:35 |
Rev Time |
1.50 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2002-05-03 |
Time |
13:35 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2002-05-03 00:00:00 | CHECKLIST: | | | 1-INFORMATION REQUESTED ON PROVISO DATED | | | 11-29-00 WAS NEVER SUBMITTED FOR | | | REVIEW. | | | 2-SUBMITTAL FOR SITE SPECIFIC PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL FOR ENTRY DOORS ASSEMBLY: | | | A)INFORMATION DOESN'T MATCH BUILDING | | | CODE USED BY ARCHITECT WHO DESIGNED | | | THE BUILDING.(SBC 1997 NOT FBC 2001). | | | B)DESIGN PRESSURES USED DON'T MEET THE | | | DESIGN PRESSURES CALCULATED BY THE | | | ARCHITECT. | | | C)AS PER BLDG OFFICIAL: SITE SPECIFIC | | | INSTALLATIONS REQUIRES PROFESSIONAL OF | | | RECORD TO REVIEW "PRODUCT APPROVAL" | | | ENGINEERING INFORMATION AND CERTIFY | | | (SIGNED AND SEALED) THAT SUCH PRODUCT | | | WILL BE STRUCTURALLY ADEQUATE TO BE | | | INSTALLED IN THE STRUCTURE HE DESIGNED | | | D)WRONG PROJECT ADDRESS. REVISE AS REQ'D | | | NOTE: ENGINEER'S CALCULATIONS SHOW THAT | | | HE CONSIDERS DOOR ASTRAGAL AND DEAD | | | BOLT TO SATISFY HIS CALCULATIONS. | | | NEED TO CHECK THAT THIS LOCKS WILL | | | COMPLY WITH EGRESS REQUIREMENTS TO | | | AVOID CONFLICTS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2001-01-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2001-01-18 |
Time |
14:15 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2001-01-18 |
Time |
14:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2000-11-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2000-11-29 |
Time |
11:13 |
Rev Time |
3.50 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2000-11-29 |
Time |
11:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2001-01-08 00:00:00 | APPROVED WITH PROVISO: | | | 1-PROVIDE COMPLETE FRAMING DETAILS FOR | | | CUPOLAS.CLEARLY SPECIFY ALL CONNECTORS | | | AND FRAMING AROUND ARCHED WINDOWS. | | | SEC. 104.2.2 CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | 2-REVISE THE DESIGN CERTIFICATION FOR | | | BUILDING CODE COMPLIANCE FORM: THE | | | MEAN ROOF HEIGHT AND BASIC VELOCITY | | | PRESSURE DON'T MATCH. SEE TABLE | | | 1606.2A OF SBC 1997. | | | 3-SOIL TEST REPORT SHOWS THE PRESENCE OF | | | ROOTS AND ORGANIC MATERIALS. THE AREA | | | UNDER FOOTINGS, FOUNDATIONS AND | | | CONCRETE SLABS ON GRADE SHALL HAVE ALL | | | VEGETATION, STUMPS, ROOTS AND FOREIGN | | | MATERIALS REMOVED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCT'N | | | SECTION 1804.1.8 SBC 1997. | | | 4-PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR: | | | A)ENTRY DOORS: 3"-0" BY 9'-0" WITH | | | SIDELITES ASSEMBLY. | | | B)FRENCH DOORS WITH SIDELITES ASSEMBLY. | | | C)ARCHED WINDOWS | | | D)COMPLETE BUTT GLAZING ASSEMBLY. | | | 5-PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR GLASS | | | MISSILE IMPACT PROTECTION FOR THIS | | | HOUSE. EG: PROVIDE A KEY PLAN SHOWING | | | AREAS TO HAVE IMPACT GLAZING AND AREAS | | | TO HAVE ANY OTHER PROTECTION. | | | -PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FORSUCH | | | OTHER METHOD OF PROTECTION. | | | 6-SEE PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | | | | | | | NOTES- | | | -IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL | | | JULIO GOMEZ, BUILDING PLAN REVIEW, AT | | | 659-8096 EXT. 8232. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2000-10-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2000-10-24 |
Time |
16:11 |
Rev Time |
4.50 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2000-10-24 |
Time |
16:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2001-01-08 00:00:00 | CHECKLIST: | | | 1-PAY IMPACT FEES TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. | | | BRING STAMPED DRAWINGS AND RECEIPT. | | | 2-SPECIFY SAFETY GLASS WHERE REQUIRED. | | | SEE PLANS. SECTION 2405.2 SBC 1997. | | | 3-ARCHITECT NEEDS TO DATE DRAWINGS WHEN | | | SIGNING AND SEALING DOCUMENTS FOR | | | PUBLIC RECORDS. CHAPTER 481 OF FLORIDA | | | STATUTES. | | | 4-SPECIFY THE CALCULATED DESIGN PRESSURE | | | FOR GARAGE DOORS. SECTION 1606 SBC/97. | | | 5-PROVIDE ATTIC ACCESS AT MASTER BATH | | | CUPOLA, ENTRY TOWER, AND COVERED REAR | | | PATIO. SECTION 2309.6 SBC 1997. | | | 6-PROVIDE A COMPLETE BATHROOM WITH A | | | DOOR THAT ALLOWS 29" MINIMUM CLEAR | | | OPENING. SECTION 11 OF FLORIDA | | | ACCESSIBILITY CODE FOR BUILDING | | | CONSTRUCTION, 1997 EDITION. | | | 7-PROVIDE COMPLETE FRAMING DETAILS FOR | | | CUPOLAS.CLEARLY SPECIFY ALL CONNECTORS | | | SECTION 104.2.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO SBC | | | 8-CLEARLY AND COMPLETELY SPECIFY THE | | | CEILING CONSTRUCTION AT FRONT AND | | | BACK PORCHES. CLEARLY SPECIFY ALL | | | MATERIALS AND FASTENER TYPE & SPACING. | | | SECTION 2504.2 SBC 1997. | | | 9-REVISE THE DESIGN CERTIFICATION FOR | | | BUILDING CODE COMPLIANCE FORM. | | | THE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT IS INCORRECT. | | | 10-SPECIFY SIZE OF CEILING FANS AS PER | | | TABLE 6-6 OF FLORIDA ENERGY EFFICIENCY | | | CODE FOR BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. 1997. | | | 11-SOIL TEST REPORT SHOWS BORINGS TESTS | | | WITH ROOTS. CLEARLY ADDRESS HOW ARE | | | THE ROOTS GOING TO BE REMOVED. | | | SECTION1804.1.8 SBC 1997. | | | 12-PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR: | | | -ENTRY DOORS 3'-0" BY 9'-0" HIGH AND | | | WITH SIDELITES ASSEMBLY. | | | -BBQ AND HOOD UL LISTING AND SPECS. | | | -FRENCH DOORS WITH SIDELITES. | | | -ARCHED WINDOWS(MISSILE IMPACT GLAZING) | | | -BUTT GLAZING ASSEMBLY. | | | 13-PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR | | | MISSILE IMPACT PROTECTION FOR GLASS | | | OPENINGS NOT COVERED IN THIS SUBMITTAL | | | UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT. | | | 14-SEE PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | NOTES: | | | -PLEASE RETURN REVIEWED SET AFTER | | | CORRECTION ARE DONE TO ORIGINALS IN | | | ORDER TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. | | | -IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL | | | JULIO GOMEZ AT 659-8096 EXT. 8232. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2000-09-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
gjoyce |
Date |
2000-09-27 |
Time |
10:31 |
Rev Time |
0.15 |
| Received By |
gjoyce |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|