| Plan Review Stops For Permit 00040803 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2000-12-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2000-12-18 |
Time |
09:16 |
Rev Time |
3.00 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2001-01-08 00:00:00 | TRUSS PLAN REVIEW : DENIED | | | TIA ANCHOR LEGEND "L" 1170 UPLIFT VS | | | TRUSS PLAN R2/ 1320 UPLIFT. | | | GT4 2M ARCH PLAN R1 =(2M) VS TRUSS PLAN | | | PAGE 76 R13690. R2 MTS12 ALLOWABLE 860 | | | (PINE)X 3=2580 VS TRUSS PLAN R2=3665. | | | GT6 3M DIFFERENCES FROM THE ARCH PLAN,IF | | | THE TRUSS MANUFACTURER CHANGES THE LAY | | | OUT WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION THE TRUSS | | | CO BECOMES RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL ANCHORAGE | | | DETAILS FROM THE BEARING TO THE FOOTER. | | | NOTED ON PLAN.WHAT TYPE OF CONNECTORS? | | | ALSO CRUSHING VALUES, 3 1/2X 550 LB=8661 | | | PAGE 104 R1=9796 /R2=8661 VS 9354. | | | NOTE ARCH BLOCK WALL VS LEDGER TYPE OF | | | CONNECTION? WALL TO TRUSS = ARCH. TRUSS | | | TO TRUSS OR GIRDER TO TRUSS= TRUSS ENG | | | TO DESIGN.LIST TYPES OF HANGERS TO BE | | | USED,BE SPECIFIC. | | | ARCH PLAN LIST "M" 1845 UPLIFT ON THE | | | FOLLOWING TRUSSES, T44,T46,T48,T50,T52, | | | T54,T56& H58. THE UPLIFT VALUES RANGE | | | FROM 3290 TO 2672, PAGES 24-29 TRUSS PL. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2000-06-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2000-06-05 |
Time |
14:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2000-06-05 |
Time |
14:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2000-05-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2000-05-16 |
Time |
19:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2000-05-16 |
Time |
19:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2001-01-08 00:00:00 | **************** UNSAT ***************** | | | | | | 1)NOTE: PLEASE SHOW THE REQ`D DEDICATED | | | BATH(S) CIRCUIT(S) PER 210-11-C-3. THEY | | | MUST BE 20 AMP #12 AWG. PLEASE LIST ON | | | PANLEL SCHEDULE. | | | | | | 2)NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT THE AIC RATING FOR | | | THE MAINS. MAINS AND ALL PANEL/BREAKER | | | EQUIPMENT MUST BE RATED FOR THE | | | AVAILABLE FAULT CURRENT. THIS WILL BE | | | REQ`D ON ALL PLANS FOR REVIEW. 110-9/ | | | 215-5 | | | | | | | | | PLEASE SUBMIT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION | | | FOR REVIEW. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS | | | PLEASE CALL 659-8096 EXT 8372 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2000-07-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cthirben |
Date |
2000-07-14 |
Time |
10:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cthirben |
Date |
2000-07-14 |
Time |
14:20 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2001-01-08 00:00:00 | PROVISO:******************************** | | | PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE VENTING OF | | | EXHAUST FANS IN BATHROOMS, THE SIZE FANS | | | THE LOCATION, VENTED TO WHERE. | | | PROVIDE VENTING INFO ON DRYER,GAS HEATER | | | RANGE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2000-06-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cthirben |
Date |
2000-06-24 |
Time |
07:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cthirben |
Date |
2000-06-24 |
Time |
07:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2001-01-08 00:00:00 | DENIED:****************************** | | | A/C# 1. IS TOO SMALL FOR DEMAND. | | | SEER VALUE IS NOT THE SAME ON ENERGY | | | CALCULATION SHEET AND THE PLANS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2000-04-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cthirben |
Date |
2000-04-24 |
Time |
13:50 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
cthirben |
Date |
2000-04-24 |
Time |
13:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2001-01-08 00:00:00 | ****************DENIED****************** | | | A/C UNIT #1 TOO SMALL FOR SUPPLY SHOWN | | | ON PLANS. | | | | | | SEER VALUE IS DIFFERENT ON PLANS AND | | | ENERGY CALC. SHEETS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2000-08-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pschmitz |
Date |
2000-08-26 |
Time |
09:58 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
pschmitz |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2001-01-08 00:00:00 | REVISION AS BUILT. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2000-04-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tlarge |
Date |
2000-04-24 |
Time |
06:18 |
Rev Time |
0.33 |
| Received By |
tlarge |
Date |
2000-04-24 |
Time |
06:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2001-01-08 00:00:00 | *****************PROVISO**************** | | | SUBMIT SANITARY RISER THAT MATCHES FLOOR | | | PLAN PRIOR TO ROUGH PLBG.INSP. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2000-07-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2000-07-21 |
Time |
12:53 |
Rev Time |
3.00 |
| Received By |
aneil |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2001-01-08 00:00:00 | PROVISO | | | | | | 1)DRAWING #99-B-043 SUBMITTED WITH | | | GARAGE DOOR PRODUCT APPROVAL DOES NOT | | | HAVE DESIGN PRESSURES WHICH MEET THE | | | CALCULATED PRESSURES FOR THE STRUCTURE. | | | DRAWING #99-B-043 REFERED TO IN TABLE 1 | | | OF THE PRODUCT APPROVAL IS ACCEPTABLE. | | | PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF THIS DRAWING AND | | | INSTALL DOOR AS SHOWN. | | | | | | 2)PROVIDE 2 CURRENT COPIES OF METRO-DADE | | | OR SBCCI PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR SPECIFIC | | | PRODUCTS TO BE INSTALLED IN EXTERIOR | | | OPENINGS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION AS LISTED | | | EXT.OUTSWING FRENCH DOOR | | | EXT.INSWING DOUBLE DOORS WITH SIDE LITES | | | WINDOW MULLIONS | | | | | | 3)PROVIDE 2 CURRENT COPIES OF METRO-DADE | | | OR SBCCI PRODUCT APPROVALS,KEY PLAN AND | | | INSTALLATION SCHEDULE,WITH SPECIFIC | | | ANCHORS TO BE USED,FOR STORM PANELS | | | UNDER SEPERATE PERMIT. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2000-06-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jcaloger |
Date |
2000-06-05 |
Time |
12:35 |
Rev Time |
1.50 |
| Received By |
jcaloger |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2001-01-08 00:00:00 | THE STRUCTURE NEEDS TO BE DESIGNED | | | ACCORDING TO SBC 1997 OR ASCE 7 95.THE | | | WIND ANALYSIS UPLIFT REPORT STATES ASCE | | | 7 88 WAS USED. RECALCULATE USING ONE OF | | | THE ABOVE DESIGN CRITERIA,1606 SBC 1997 | | | | | | PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE FRENCH | | | DOORS PREPARED BY A RECONIZED AGENCY. | | | IN LIEW OF THE ABOVE PROVIUDE SITE | | | SPECIFIC ENGINEERING BEARING A ORIGINAL | | | SIGNATURE AND RAISED SEAL. | | | | | | THE PROPOSED GAGRAGE DOOR IS NOT DESIGNE | | | D TO WITHSTAND THE WIND PRESSURES. | | | | | | METRO DADE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE | | | OUTSWING DOOR, INCLUDE THE DRAWINGS | | | SPECIFIED IN SECTION PARA 2.1.NOTE WE | | | DO NOT ACCEPT BROWARD COUNTY PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL FORMS. | | | | | | NEEDS COUNTY IMP[ACT FEES PAID. | | | | | | SEE MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS. | | | | | | *************************************** | | | 6/28/00PLANS STILL NOT DESIGNED TO | | | REQUIRED DESIGN CRITERIA, ASCE 7-95 | | | AND 145 MPH WIND ZONE***** | | | PROVIDE DESIGN COMPLIANCE FORM AND | | | CALCULATIONS USED FOR DETERMING THE WIND | | | PRESSURES FOR THE EXTERIOR WINDOW | | | OPENINGS WHICH ARE LOCATED IN THE END | | | ZONES. ALSO INCLUDE WIND LOAD CALCULATIO | | | FOR THE OVERHEAD GARAGE DOOR OPENINGS. | | | ************************************** |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2000-04-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
gjoyce |
Date |
2000-04-19 |
Time |
11:04 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
| Received By |
gjoyce |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|