| 2023-08-07 13:20:10 | RECEIVED A LETTER FROM COMPLAINANT (NEIG |
| | STACIE ORTIZ. WENT OUT TO LOCATION 1205 |
| | VERIFY THAT BEE DOES EXIST. NOTED IT DOE |
| | BEES HAVE RETURNED WILL COMPLETE ANOTHER |
| | ANOTHER ABATEMENT AT LOCATION. IT DOES A |
| | ARE ON EAST AND REAR OF PROPERTY AGAIN. |
| | |
| | SUBJECT: URGENT CONCERNS REGARDING PROPE |
| | AT 1205 WORTHINGTON AVENUE |
| | |
| | DEAR SIR/MADAM AND MS. SAMUELS, |
| | |
| | I AM WRITING AS A CONCERNED RESIDENT OF |
| | BEACH NEIGHBORHOOD TO URGENTLY ADDRESS M |
| | DISTRESSING ISSUES RELATED TO THE PROPER |
| | 1205 WORTHINGTON AVENUE, ASSOCIATED WITH |
| | BOUSIQUOT AND THE ESTATE OF NOEL SAMUELS |
| | SITUATION IS HAVING A SIGNIFICANTLY NEGA |
| | THE WELL-BEING AND SAFETY OF THE RESIDEN |
| | THE PROPERTY. |
| | |
| | OUR CONCERNS ARE AS FOLLOWS: |
| | |
| | 1. BEE INFESTATION: BEES ARE SURROUNDING |
| | OF THE ROOF IN THE BACK AND NORTHEAST SI |
| | PROPERTY. THIS POSES A SERIOUS SAFETY RI |
| | RESIDENTS, PARTICULARLY THOSE WHO MAY BE |
| | BEE STINGS. URGENT ACTION IS REQUIRED TO |
| | INFESTATION AND ENSURE THE SAFETY OF THE |
| | THERE WAS A PREVIOUS ATTEMPT TO REMOVE T |
| | THE ATTEMPT WAS UNSUCCESSFUL. THERE NEED |
| | CERTIFIED BEE EXPERT TO REMOVE A COLONY |
| | WHICH WAS NOT DONE BECAUSE THE BEES ARE |
| | HAS GROWN TO OTHER AREAS. MY TENANTS HAV |
| | THE BEES AND THEIR DOG HAS BEEN STUNG BY |
| | |
| | 2. RODENT PROBLEM: THE PROPERTY'S DEBRIS |
| | HAVE CAUSED A SEVERE RODENT INFESTATION, |
| | BEING REGULARLY OBSERVED IN THE VICINITY |
| | ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS IS ATTRACTING ROD |
| | CONTRIBUTING TO THE PROBLEM. THIS SITUAT |
| | HEALTH HAZARDS AND PROPERTY DAMAGE RISKS |
| | NEIGHBORS AND SHOULD BE ADDRESSED PROMPT |
| | NEIGHBORS HAVE BANNED TOGETHER TO TRY AN |
| | PROBLEM WITH RAT POISON BUT THAT IS NOT |
| | IT IS A KNOWN FACT THAT RODENTS CARRY DI |
| | AN INFESTATION IN A YARD FULL OF DEBRIS |
| | ATTRACTING GARBAGE. MORE THAN 5 WERE CAU |
| | ONE DAY! IT???S BEYOND NORMAL AND POSES |
| | TO THE RESIDENTS AND THEIR PETS. |
| | |
| | 3. DETERIORATING PROPERTY CONDITION: WIT |
| | OBSERVED THAT THE INSIDE OF THE PROPERTY |
| | DETERIORATING CONDITION, WITH EVIDENCE O |
| | THE DOOR WAS LEFT OPEN FOR SEVERAL DAYS. |
| | CONDITIONS CAN LEAD TO SAFETY HAZARDS AN |
| | DETRIMENTAL TO THE OVERALL WELL-BEING OF |
| | |
| | 4. CONCERN FOR THE WELFARE OF THE PROPER |
| | CONCERNED NEIGHBOR CALLED THE POLICE FOR |
| | CHECK WHEN MS. BOUSIQUOT WAS NOT SEEN FO |
| | THIS HIGHLIGHTS THE SERIOUSNESS OF THE S |
| | THE NEED FOR INTERVENTION TO ENSURE THE |
| | WELFARE OF THE PROPERTY OWNER. |
| | |
| | WE KINDLY REQUEST THAT THE CITY OF WEST |
| | ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT TAKES IMMEDIATE A |
| | ACTION TO ADDRESS THESE URGENT CONCERNS. |
| | VIOLATIONS ALONE MAY NOT BE SUFFICIENT T |
| | SEVERITY OF THE ISSUES AT HAND. WE SUGGE |
| | MATTER BE TAKEN TO THE NEXT LEVEL TO ENS |
| | COMPREHENSIVE RESOLUTION. NEIGHBORS HAVE |
| | HELP HER CLEAN HER YARD BUT SHE DISMISSE |
| | NOT ADDRESS IT. |
| | |
| | AS RESPONSIBLE NEIGHBORS, WE WANT TO MAI |
| | AND PLEASANT LIVING ENVIRONMENT FOR EVER |
| | BELIEVE THAT THE COMMUNITY'S WELL-BEING |
| | IMPORTANCE, AND PROMPT ACTION IS NECESSA |
| | THESE CRITICAL PROBLEMS. |
| | |
| | IN CONCLUSION, WE URGE MS. BOUSIQUOT AND |
| | NOEL SAMUELS TO WORK COOPERATIVELY WITH |
| | ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT AND TAKE ALL NECE |
| | TO ADDRESS THE CONCERNS RAISED. THE SAFE |
| | OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD SHOULD BE THE TOP PR |
| | |
| | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MAT |
| | HOPE FOR A SWIFT AND EFFECTIVE RESOLUTIO |
| | THAT YOU WILL TAKE THESE CONCERNS SERIOU |
| | PRIORITIZE THE SAFETY AND HEALTH OF OUR |
| | |
| | SINCERELY, |
| | |
| | JUAN PEREZ AND STACIE ORTIZ |
| | |
| | |
| | |
