Date |
Text |
2020-10-05 14:49:49 | INSUFFICIENT - 2ND REVIEW |
| |
| PERMIT 20060481 AT&T CRAN_RTFL_PBC36_01 4 916 5TH ST |
| |
| THE PROPOSED POLE LOCATION IS IN A RESIDENTIAL AREA. IN |
| ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 78-411(B)(2) OF THE CITY CODE, |
| WHENEVER WIRELESS FACILITIES MUST BE PLACED IN A |
| RIGHT-OF-WAY WITH RESIDENTIAL USES ON ONE OR BOTH |
| SIDES, NEITHER POLES, EQUIPMENT, ANTENNAS OR OTHER |
| STRUCTURES SHALL BE PLACED DIRECTLY IN FRONT OF A |
| RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE. ALL WIRELESS FACILITIES SHALL BE |
| LOCATED SUCH THAT VIEWS FROM RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES ARE |
| NOT SIGNIFICANTLY IMPAIRED. THANK YOU FOR MOVING THE |
| POLE FROM IN FRONT OF THE RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE AT 908 |
| 5TH STREET; HOWEVER, THE NEW PROPOSED LOCATION IS NOW |
| PROPOSED SUCH THAT IT WILL BE IN FRONT OF A FUTURE |
| RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE AT 916 5TH STREET. SINCE THIS |
| SEEMS TO BE YOUR DESIRED LOCATION FOR THE POLE, IN |
| ORDER TO COMPLY WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS, THE POLE NEEDS |
| TO BE INSTALLED IN THE PARKWAY AREA AT THE PROPERTY |
| LINE EXTENDED BETWEEN 908 AND 916 5TH STREET. THE |
| PROPERTY LINE NEEDS TO BE CLEARLY SHOWN ON THE SURVEY |
| SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY LOCATION COMPLIANCE. |
| |
| THE SURVEY SHOWS THAT THE POLE WILL BE WITHIN FIVE (5) |
| FEET OF THE EXISTING WATER CONNECTIONS AND METERS FOR |
| THE 916 5TH STREET PROPERTY. THE POLE MAY NOT BE THIS |
| CLOSE TO THE WATER LINES AND REINFORCES THE MOVE |
| EASTWARD TO THE PROPERTY LINE EXTENDED. |
| |
| PLEASE SEE THE LIST BELOW FOR AN ANALYSIS OF THE |
| DEFICIENCIES IN INFORMATION REQUIRED BY SECTION 78-401 |
| OF THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CODE AS PART OF THE |
| COMMUNICATION FACILITIES PLACEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION. |
| THE DEFICIENT INFORMATION MUST BE PROVIDED FOR STAFF TO |
| REVIEW THE PERMIT APPLICATION. PLEASE NOTE THAT STAFF |
| HAS ALSO INCLUDED SOME SUBSTANTIVE REVIEW COMMENTS, |
| THAT WHILE NOT RESULTING IN A DEFICIENT APPLICATION, |
| NEED TO BE ADDRESSED OR THE PERMIT WILL NOT BE |
| APPROVED. |
| |
| 1) ENGINEERING PLAN - NO UPDATED ENGINEERING PLAN WAS |
| SUBMITTED. |
| |
| A. THE ENGINEERING PLANS DID NOT INCLUDE A SCALE. THE |
| CITY CODE REQUIRES THE PLANS TO BE DRAWN AT A 10FT, |
| 20FT, OR 40FT SCALE. PROVIDE THE PLANS AT THE REQUIRED |
| SCALE. |
| |
| B. THE SUBMITTED ENGINEERING PLAN MUST BE BASED ON THE |
| SURVEY AND SHOW THE ABOVE AND BELOW GROUND FEATURES. |
| THIS INCLUDES THE TREES ALONG THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. |
| |
| C. THE SIZE OF THE PROPOSED POLE BASE WITHIN THE |
| RIGHT-OF-WAY MUST BE SHOWN ON THE ENGINEERING PLAN. |
| |
| D. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE INFORMATION REGARDING |
| EXISTING UTILITY POLES (INCLUDING LIGHT POLES) WITHIN |
| 50 FEET OF YOUR PROPOSED POLE. THE POLE HEIGHT AND BASE |
| DIAMETER SHALL BE INCLUDED. THIS WILL BE USED TO VERIFY |
| IF THE PROPOSED 25 FOOT SUPPORT POLE (WITH 5 FOOT |
| ANTENNA CANNISTER) HEIGHT COMPLIES WITH THE HEIGHTS OF |
| EXISTING UTILITY POLES. |
| |
| E. THE ENGINEERING PLAN MUST BE BASED OFF OF THIS |
| SURVEY INFORMATION. |
| |
| 2) THANK YOU FOR USING A POLE STYLE THAT MEETS THE |
| CITY'S CONCEALMENT REQUIREMENTS. AT THIS LOCATION, THE |
| CITY REQUIRES THE POLE TO BE EITHER BLACK OR GREEN, NOT |
| ITS NATURAL STEEL COLOR. PLEASE SPECIFY THE COLOR YOU |
| CHOOSE TO USE ON THE PLANS. |
| |
| 3) EVIDENCE OF INSURANCE COVERAGE - YOU ARE REQUIRED TO |
| SUBMIT VERIFICATION OF INSURANCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE |
| PROVISIONS OF SECTION 78-406 OF THE CITY CODE OF |
| ORDINANCES. PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE CERTIFICATE OF |
| LIABILITY INSURANCE NEEDS TO BE ISSUED TO THE APPLICANT |
| LISTED ON THE COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES PLACEMENT |
| PERMIT APPLICATION - NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS LLC. |
| |
| 4) ELECTRONIC FORMAT OF SUBMITTAL - THE SUBMITTAL WAS |
| NOT PROVIDED IN ELECTRONIC FORM. A COPY OF ALL OF THE |
| SUBMITTAL MATERIAL MUST BE SUBMITTED IN ELECTRONIC |
| FORMAT. |
| |
| CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| [email protected] |
| |