Date |
Text |
2021-07-19 17:38:18 | INSUFFIENT |
| |
| 1) REPEAT COMMENT: ALONG CLARE AVENUE (BETWEEN |
| HANDHOLES 0+00 AND 5+35), THE LATEST SURVEY SHOWS |
| APPROXIMATELY THREE (3) FEET BETWEEN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY |
| LINE AND THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT AS WELL AS OFFSET FROM |
| THE BUILDINGS. THE ENGINEERING PLANS SHOW THE |
| RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AT THE FACE OF THE BUILDINGS WITH AN |
| APPROXIMATELY SIX (6) FOOT WIDE SIDEWALK. WHILE THE |
| BORE IS GENERALLY SHOWN AS FOUR (4) FEET FROM THE FACE |
| OF THE BUILDINGS ON THE ENGINEERING PLAN, BASED ON THE |
| SURVEY, THE BORE IS WITHIN PRIVATE PROPERTY, WHICH IS |
| NOT PERMITTED UNLESS A UTILITY EASEMENT IS PRESENT. NO |
| UTILITY EASEMENT IS SHOWN ON THE SURVEY. PLEASE REVIEW |
| YOUR PLANS AND SHOW ACCURATE CONDITIONS. THIS NEEDS TO |
| BE CORRECTED EITHER WITH A NEW SURVEY OR REVISED |
| ENGINEERING PLANS. |
| |
| 2) REPEAT COMMENT: SHEET 13A STATES THAT TIE IN 2+65 |
| REQUIRES THE REMOVAL AND RESTORATION OF A GRASS AREA. |
| THERE IS NO GRASS IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG CLARE |
| AVENUE, SO THIS MAY NOT OCCUR AS IT WOULD BE ON PRIVATE |
| PROPERTY. NOTE: SHEET 13 LISTS THE SAME TIE IN AS |
| REPLACING CONCRETE. ALL PLANS MUST STATE SAME |
| CONDITIONS. |
| |
| 3) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE SURVEY FOR SHEETS 22 AND 23. |
| THE BORE ON SHEET 22 APPEARS TO CROSS INTO PRIVATE |
| PROPERTY AND THE BORE ON SHEET 23 SHOWS ENCROACHMENT ON |
| PRIVATE PROPERTY. UNLESS THERE IS A UTILITY EASEMENT |
| SHOWN ON THE SURVEY AT THESE LOCATIONS, YOU MAY NOT |
| CROSS ONTO PRIVATE PROPERTY. NOTE: BASED ON REVIEWING |
| THE PALM BEACH COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER SITE, THE |
| SIDEWALK IS NOT WHOLLY WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY; |
| THEREFORE, YOUR BORE UNDER THE SIDEWALK CROSSES ON |
| PRIVATE PROPERTY, WHICH IS NOTE PERMITTED. THE SURVEY |
| IS REQUIRED TO VERIFY THAT EITHER YOU ARE NOT ON |
| PRIVATE PROPERTY OR THAT THERE IS A UTILITY EASEMENT |
| FOR WHERE YOU ENCROACH. |
| |
| 4) REPEAT COMMENT: SHEETS 24 AND 25 STILL SHOW THE |
| INCORRECT LOCATION OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AT THE NORTH END |
| OF HOWARD PARK. THE AREA SHOWN AS RIGHT-OF-WAY AT THE |
| BACK OF THE SIDEWALK IS PRIVATE PROPERTY OWNED BY THE |
| CITY AND NOT RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE HANDHOLE, TIE IN AND |
| BORE HAVE BEEN SHOWN MOVED OUT OF THE PRIVATE PROPERTY |
| (BACK OF SIDEWALK); HOWEVER, THE ENGINEERING PLAN NEEDS |
| TO BE CORRECTED TO SHOW THE ACCURATE RIGHT-OF-WAY |
| CONDITION. |
| |
| 5) REPEAT COMMENT: ENGINEERING SHEET 29 SHOWS A NEW |
| HANDHOLE IN THE SIDEWALK ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES |
| OF FERN STREET. THE CONSTRUCTION FOR THE 360 SOUTH |
| ROSEMARY OFFICE TOWER HAS BEEN COMPLETED. YOU MUST |
| UPDATE YOUR PLANS TO SHOW THE COMPLETED RIGHT-OF-WAY |
| WORK AND VERIFY THAT HANDHOLE 99+60 DOES NOT CONFLICT |
| WITH STREET TREES OR A POSSIBLE GAS LINE. ADDITIONALLY, |
| THE SURVEY NEEDS TO SHOW THE SOUTH SIDE OF FERN STREET |
| IN THE LOCATION OF WORK. CURRENTLY THE SURVEYOR'S NOTES |
| COVER THE AREA. |
| |
| 6) PLEASE NOTE THAT CITYPLACE RETAIL, LLC, IS IN THE |
| PROCESS OF RECONFIGURING THE SIDEWALK/LANDSCAPE WITHIN |
| THE OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD RIGHT-OF-WAY AT THE LOCATION |
| OF HANDHOLE 1+69. YOU WILL NEED TO VERIFY THE FINAL |
| CONDITIONS TO COORDINATE YOUR INSTALLATION. STAFF IS |
| CONCERNED WITH THE FINAL GRADE OF THE HANDHOLE IN |
| RELATIONSHIP TO THE SURROUNDING AREA. |
| |
| 7) THE BORE SHOWN AT 5 TO 12 FEET BELOW GRADE IS AT A |
| SUFFICIENT DEPTH TO AVOID TREE AND PALM DAMAGE. |
| |
| 8) THE INSTALLATION CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT SUNSHINE |
| 811 TO VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES AND VERIFY |
| ALL DEPTHS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ALL CITY UTILITIES |
| MUST BE LOCATED BY SOFT DIG METHODS BEFORE STARTING THE |
| WORK. |
| |
| 9) THE RIGHT-OF-WAY USE PERMIT REQUIRES YOU TO PROVIDE |
| A CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE, WHICH IN |
| ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 78-406 OF THE CITY CODE |
| SPECIFICALLY NAMES THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, ITS |
| COMMISSIONERS, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS AS |
| ADDITIONAL INSURED. |
| |
| CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| [email protected] |
| |
| |