Date |
Text |
2020-03-16 16:47:07 | INCOMPLETE APPLICATION |
| |
| PERMIT 19020053 - MCIMETRO PROJECT #:1801CVFF.210 |
| UNDERGROUND FIBER CLARE TO CLEMATIS - 2ND REVIEW |
| |
| PLEASE SEE THE LIST BELOW FOR AN ANALYSIS OF THE |
| DEFICIENCIES IN INFORMATION REQUIRED BY SECTION 78-401 |
| OF THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CODE AS PART OF THE |
| COMMUNICATION FACILITIES PLACEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION. |
| THE DEFICIENT INFORMATION MUST BE PROVIDED FOR STAFF TO |
| REVIEW THE PERMIT APPLICATION. PLEASE NOTE THAT STAFF |
| HAS ALSO INCLUDED SOME SUBSTANTIVE REVIEW COMMENTS, |
| THAT WHILE NOT RESULTING IN A DEFICIENT APPLICATION, |
| NEED TO BE ADDRESSED OR THE PERMIT WILL NOT BE |
| APPROVED. |
| |
| 1) ENGINEERING PLANS |
| |
| A. UPDATED COMMENT: THE ENGINEERING PLANS MUST SHOW THE |
| RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE CLARE AVENUE |
| RESIDENTIAL PROJECT (CLARE AND WILKINS AVENUES), THE |
| ROSEMARY AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT, THE 360 SOUTH |
| ROSEMARY PROJECT (SOUTH ROSEMARY AVENUE AND FERN |
| STREET), THE QUADRILLE/FERN MAST ARM INSTALLATION |
| PROJECT AND THE CLEMATIS STREET PHASE III PROJECT. |
| STAFF NEEDS TO VERIFY THAT THE PROPOSED FIBER CONDUIT, |
| MARKER POLES, HANDHOLDS AND FUTURE COMMUNICATION POLES |
| DO NOT INTERFERE WITH THESE APPROVED RIGHT-OF-WAY |
| PROJECTS. |
| |
| 2) UPDATED COMMENT: SURVEY OF UNDERGROUND FACILITIES - |
| THE SURVEY NEEDS TO BE AT A SIZE/SCALE THAT IS LEGIBLE. |
| STAFF IS UNABLE TO MAKE OUT ANY DETAILS ON THE SURVEY |
| THAT WAS PROVIDED. |
| |
| A. ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES NEED TO BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| SURVEY. IF THE BORE IS PROPOSED WITHIN FIVE (5) FEET OF |
| AN EXISTING UTILITY, YOU NEED TO PROVIDE A LETTER FROM |
| THAT UTILITY THAT THE PROPOSED BORE DOES NOT INTERFERE |
| WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THEIR SERVICES. |
| |
| B. THE SURVEY, PREPARED BY A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR, |
| MUST SHOW THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, THE SIDEWALK, AND ANY |
| TREES WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG THE FIBER CONDUIT |
| PATH. |
| |
| C. THE ENGINEERING PLANS MUST SHOW THE SAME CONDITIONS |
| AS THE SURVEY, SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT NONE OF |
| THE PROPOSED WORK (MARKER POLES, HANDHOLDS OR CONDUIT |
| IS BEING INSTALLED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY AND THAT NO |
| TREES (SPECIFICALLY THEIR ROOT SYSTEM) ARE BEING |
| AFFECTED. |
| |
| D. PROVIDE THE SURVEY BACK UP FOR SHEETS 19 THROUGH 22, |
| SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT THE PROPOSED WORK IS IN |
| THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE LOCATION MAP LINE APPEARS TO |
| CROSS OUT OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE ONTO PRIVATE |
| PROPERTY. |
| |
| 3) REPEAT COMMENT: ESTIMATED SCHEDULE - NO SCHEDULE WAS |
| PROVIDED. PROVIDE A NARRATIVE OF THE ESTIMATED SCHEDULE |
| OF THE PROPOSED WORK. |
| |
| 4) POLE STYLE - PLEASE NOTE THAT THE FUTURE POLES ARE |
| REQUIRED TO MEET THE CITY CONCEALMENT STANDARDS |
| OUTLINED IN SECTION 78-411 OF THE CITY CODE. |
| |
| NOTE: STAFF WILL NOT APPROVE THE INSTALLATION OF A SIX |
| (6) FOOT TALL MARKER POLE ADJACENT TO THE HANDHOLES. IF |
| THE HANDHOLES NEED TO BE MARKED, THEN PROVIDE THE |
| INFORMATION ON THE HANDHOLE COVER. |
| |
| 5) ELECTRONIC FORMAT OF SUBMITTAL -. A COPY OF ALL OF |
| THE SUBMITTAL MATERIAL MUST BE SUBMITTED IN ELECTRONIC |
| FORMAT. |
| |
| CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| [email protected] |
| |