Plan Review Details - Permit 19020053
Plan Review Stops For Permit 19020053
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2023-05-03 Cont ID  
Sent By sberglun Date 2023-05-03 Time 12:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By sberglun Date 2023-05-03 Time 12:47 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2022-12-30 Cont ID  
Sent By sberglun Date 2022-12-30 Time 09:57 Rev Time 0.00
Received By sberglun Date 2022-12-30 Time 09:57 Sent To  
Notes
2022-12-30 09:59:201) SHEET 11, RELOCATE BORE AND BORE PIT SO IT IS NOT ON
 TOP OF THE CITY'S 6" WM.
 2) SHEET 12, RELOCATE BORE AND BORE PIT SO IT IS NOT ON
 TOP OF THE CITY'S 6" WM.
 3) SHEET 29, CITY HAS EXISTING 12" FM NOT SHOWN ON THE
 PLANS
 4) SHEET 30, CITY HAS EXISTING 12" FM NOT SHOWN ON THE
 PLANS
 5) REPEAT COMMENT: SHEET 26 TO 27, HIBISCUS NORTH TO
 FERN, RELOCATE BORE TO WEST SIDE OF ROAD TO AVOID THE
 CITY'S 24" STORM PIPE, 20" FORCE MAIN, AND 36" POTABLE
 WATER MAIN
 6) SHEET 28, FERN STREET OPEN CUT, MILL AND RESURFACE
 ON 50' EACH SIDE OF TRENCH REQUIRED INCLUDING
 RESTRIPING WITH THE SPECIALTY BICYCLE MARKING PER CITY
 DETAIL GC-9.
 7) GENERAL COMMENT, SIDEWALK RESTORATION REQUIRED PER
 CITY STANDARD GC-1. ENTIRE FLAG OF SIDEWALK MUST BE
 REPLACED.
 SUZANNE BERGLUND
 [email protected]
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2022-07-14 Cont ID  
Sent By sberglun Date 2022-07-14 Time 08:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By sberglun Date 2022-07-14 Time 08:25 Sent To  
Notes
2022-07-14 08:28:321) CITY UTILITIES ARE SHOWN INCORRECTLY ON PLANS.
 PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL, [email protected] FOR
 AS-BUILT INFORMATION. PLEASE INCLUDE AS-BUILT
 INFORMATION IN YOUR RESUBMITTAL.
 2) CONSIDER RELOCATING THE BORE ON SAPODILLA NORTH OF
 IRIS TO THE WEST SIDE OF THE ROAD. THE CITY HAS AN
 IXISTING 36" WM, 20" FM, AND STORMWATER TRUNKLINE ON
 THE EAST SIDE OF THE ROAD IN THIS AREA.
 3) PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AGAIN AFTER ALL ZONING
 COMMENTS ARE ADDRESSED.
  
 SUZANNE BERGLUND
 [email protected]
 561-494-1075
  
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2022-06-27 Cont ID  
Sent By sberglun Date 2022-06-27 Time 13:58 Rev Time 0.00
Received By sberglun Date 2022-06-27 Time 13:58 Sent To  
Notes
2022-06-27 13:58:391) ADDRESS ALL ZONING COMMENTS.
Review Stop ENG-APP ENGINEERING APP. REVIEW
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2022-12-30 Cont ID  
Sent By sberglun Date 2022-12-30 Time 09:32 Rev Time 0.00
Received By sberglun Date 2022-12-30 Time 09:32 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG-APP ENGINEERING APP. REVIEW
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2022-06-27 Cont ID  
Sent By sberglun Date 2022-06-27 Time 13:57 Rev Time 0.00
Received By sberglun Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-03-04 14:43:57SH 25-29 OLD DRAWINGS THIS AREA WAS RECENTLY STREE
 SCAPED.
  
 CONTACT GORDON PATRIE AT [email protected]
Review Stop ENG-P ENGINEERING PLANNING REVIEW
Rev No 6 Status P Date 2023-04-18 Cont ID  
Sent By sberglun Date 2022-12-30 Time 09:32 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cseifer Date 2023-04-18 Time 15:12 Sent To  
Notes
2023-04-18 15:11:45PLANS COMPLY TO ENGINEERING REQUIREMENT.
 CHLOE SEIFER
 [email protected]
Review Stop ENG-P ENGINEERING PLANNING REVIEW
Rev No 5 Status F Date 2022-06-08 Cont ID  
Sent By gpatrie Date 2022-06-08 Time 08:39 Rev Time 0.00
Received By gpatrie Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-06-08 08:39:06ADDRESS ALL ZONEING COMMENTS.
  
 CONTACT [email protected]
Review Stop ENG-P ENGINEERING PLANNING REVIEW
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2021-02-25 Cont ID  
Sent By gpatrie Date 2021-02-25 Time 14:14 Rev Time 0.00
Received By gpatrie Date 2021-02-25 Time 14:13 Sent To  
Notes
2021-02-25 14:20:23PROJECT #1801CVFF.210
  
 1. SURVEY INCOMPLETE.
 2. SH 20-25 MISSING.
 3. COPY OF FEC RR PERMIT REQUIRED.
 4. NO SMALL CELL TOWER DRAWING PROVIDED.
 5. SH 29 "OPEN R/W CUT" NO RESTORATION DRAWING
 PROVIDED.
 6. S ROSEMARY AVE WAS RECENTLY STREET SCAPED. DRAWING
 IS OUT OF DATE AND MUST ALSO SHOW AERIALS.
Review Stop ENG-P ENGINEERING PLANNING REVIEW
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2020-10-09 Cont ID  
Sent By gpatrie Date 2020-10-09 Time 11:13 Rev Time 0.00
Received By gpatrie Date 2020-10-09 Time 11:11 Sent To  
Notes
2020-10-09 11:12:58SH 26-33 OLD DRAWINGS. THESE AREAS WERE STREET SCAPED.
 PROVIDE UPDATED DRAWINGS.
  
 CONTACT: [email protected]
Review Stop ENG-P ENGINEERING PLANNING REVIEW
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2020-09-16 Cont ID  
Sent By gpatrie Date 2020-09-16 Time 07:39 Rev Time 0.00
Received By gpatrie Date 2020-09-16 Time 07:38 Sent To  
Notes
2020-09-16 07:38:49DRAWINGS NOT OVER AERIALS.
 STREET NAMES NOT SHOWN.
Review Stop ENG-P ENGINEERING PLANNING REVIEW
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2019-02-14 Cont ID  
Sent By rsklarew Date 2019-02-14 Time 09:11 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rsklarew Date 2019-02-14 Time 09:11 Sent To  
Notes
2019-02-14 07:25:10THE CITY OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT IS REQUESTING A
 MEETING TO REVIEW THE LOCATIONS OF THE CELL TOWERS.
2019-02-13 14:47:49PERMIT # 19020053
 1. SH #4 SHOW ALL OF WPB CONTACTS.
  
 2. CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAILS TO BE SHOWN ON ALL
 DRAWINGS.
  
 3. PG #6,7&10 SHOW WPB STANDARD DETAILS.
  
 4. ALL HAND HOLDS, PULL BOXES BORE PITS, TOWERS &
 MARKER POLES TO BE LOCATED WITH STATION AND OFFSETS.
  
 5. PROVIDE RESTORATION DETAILS FOR BORE PITS, HAND
 HOLDS, PULL BOXES AND POLE INSTALLATIONS.
  
 6. SOFT DIG ALL CITY OF WPB UTILITY CROSSINGS.
  
 7. PROVIDE BONS FOR ALL CITY UTILITY WORK.
  
 8. SHOW ALL PROPERITY LINES ON DRAWINGS.
  
 9. MAINTAINE MINIUM SEPERATION FOR ALL CITY UTILITIES.
  
 10. ALL ENGINEERING PLANS TO BE SHOWN OVER AERIALS.
  
 11. SUBMIT SURVEY FROM A REGESTERED FLORIDA SURVERYER.
2019-02-07 08:38:26TEST
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 7 Status N Date 2023-05-04 Cont ID  
Sent By aoliver Date 2023-05-04 Time 07:49 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aoliver Date 2023-05-02 Time 18:10 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 6 Status N Date 2023-01-03 Cont ID  
Sent By aoliver Date 2023-01-03 Time 09:49 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aoliver Date 2022-10-20 Time 06:20 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 5 Status N Date 2022-07-27 Cont ID  
Sent By lmarchan Date 2022-07-27 Time 10:14 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmarchan Date 2022-06-28 Time 13:43 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 4 Status N Date 2022-06-27 Cont ID  
Sent By lmarchan Date 2022-06-27 Time 15:55 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmarchan Date 2022-02-02 Time 10:34 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2021-09-10 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2021-09-10 Time 10:32 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date 2021-08-09 Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2021-08-11 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2021-07-19 Time 14:04 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date 2021-04-05 Time 14:04 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2021-08-11 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2021-03-03 Time 14:01 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date 2021-01-27 Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 11 Status P Date 2023-05-03 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2023-05-03 Time 17:14 Rev Time 4.00
Received By eschneid Date 2023-05-02 Time 18:12 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 10 Status F Date 2022-11-16 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2022-11-16 Time 17:34 Rev Time 4.00
Received By eschneid Date 2022-11-07 Time 15:41 Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-16 17:38:34PLANS COMPLY WITH ZONING.
  
 THIS REVIEW APPLIES TO SECTION 10 THROUGH 20 OF THE
 OVERALL VIEW SHEET. SECTIONS 21 THROUGH 29 WILL BE PART
 OF A SEPARATE WCF PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 THE PERMIT WILL REMAIN IN ZONING FAILED STATUS UNTIL
 ENGINEERING APPROVAL.
  
 *** PLEASE DO NOT UPLOAD THE MOT PLANS WITH THIS WCF
 ROW PERMIT. MOT PLANS ARE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY USE PERMIT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ***
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ 561-822-1446
 [email protected]
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 9 Status F Date 2022-07-27 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2022-07-27 Time 08:40 Rev Time 4.00
Received By eschneid Date 2022-06-30 Time 15:24 Sent To  
Notes
2022-07-27 08:41:02INSUFFICIENT
  
 1) A SURVEY, PREPARED BY FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR,
 MUST BE UPLOADED FOR THE FULL LENGTH OF THE PROJECT.
 THE RESPONSE STATES THAT THE ENGINEERING PLANS ARE
 BASED ON THE PROPERTY APPRAISER. THE PROPERTY APPRAISER
 MAPS ARE NOT A SURVEY AND OFTEN DO NOT SHOW ACCURATE
 PROPERTY LINE/RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE RELATIONSHIP, WHICH IS
 WHY THE CITY CODE REQUIRES THE PLANS TO BE BASED OFF A
 PROVIDED SURVEY. SURVEY SHEETS, CREATED BY PRINCIPAL
 MERIDIAN SURVEYING, INC., DATED 11-15-20 AND 2-17-20,
 HAVE BEEN PROVIDED TO THE CITY AS PART OF PREVIOUS
 APPLICATIONS AND THE ONES THAT STILL SHOW EXISTING
 CONDITIONS MAY BE UPLOADED FOR USE. PLEASE NOTE THE
 FOLLOWING COMMENTS, SOME OF WHICH HAVE BEEN PREVIOUSLY
 PROVIDED AND SOME ARE BASED ON THE NEWLY SUBMITTED
 PLANS.
  
 A. CURRENT SHEET 10 OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES HH 00+00 AND
 PROPOSED BORE PIT 02+80, SHOWS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN
 THE ROW LINE ON THE SURVEY AND THE ROW LINE ON SHEET
 10. THE ROW LINE IS SHOWN IN THE MIDDLE OF THE SIDEWALK
 ON THE SURVEY WHILE THE ROW LINE CALLED OUT ON SHEET 10
 IS IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION AT THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK.
 WHILE THE BORE APPEARS TO BE WITHIN THE ROW, PROPOSED
 BORE PIT 02+80 WOULD BE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY WHERE NO
 EASEMENT IS SHOWN ON THE SURVEY. THIS IS NOT PERMITTED.
 B. CURRENT SHEET 11 OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES PROPOSED HH
 05+10 AND ADDITIONAL HHS, SHOWS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN
 THE ROW LINE ON THE SURVEY AND THE ROW LINE ON SHEET 11
 ALONG CLARE AVE. THE ROW LINE IS SHOWN IN THE MIDDLE OF
 THE SIDEWALK ON THE SURVEY WHILE THE ROW LINE CALLED
 OUT ON SHEET 11 IS IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION AT THE BACK
 OF THE SIDEWALK. WHILE THE BORE APPEARS TO BE WITHIN
 THE ROW, PROPOSED HH 05+10 WOULD BE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY
 WHERE NO EASEMENT IS SHOWN ON THE SURVEY. THIS IS NOT
 PERMITTED. THE REMAINING HH ARE ALL WITHIN THE ROW.
 C. CURRENT SHEET 12 OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES PROPOSED HH
 13+80 AND ADDITIONAL BORE PITS, IS PASSED BY ZONING.
 D. CURRENT SHEET 13 OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES PROPOSED HH
 23+25 AND BORE PIT 19+90, SHOWS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN
 THE ROW LINE ON THE SURVEY AND THE ROW LINE ON SHEET 13
 WITHIN THE OKEECHOBEE ROAD ROW. THE ROW LINE IS SHOWN
 IN THE TRAVEL LANE ON THE SURVEY WHILE THE ROW LINE
 CALLED OUT ON SHEET 13 IS IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION AT
 THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK. THE BORE APPEARS TO BE ON
 PRIVATE PROPERTY WHERE NO EASEMENT IS SHOWN ON THE
 SURVEY. THIS IS NOT PERMITTED.
 E. CURRENT SHEET 14 OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES PROPOSED HH
 28+08 AND ADDITIONAL BORE PITS, SHOWS A DISCREPANCY
 BETWEEN THE ROW LINE ON THE SURVEY AND THE ROW LINE ON
 SHEET 14 WITHIN THE OKEECHOBEE ROAD ROW. THE ROW LINE
 IS SHOWN IN THE TRAVEL LANE ON THE SURVEY WHILE THE ROW
 LINE CALLED OUT ON SHEET 14 IS IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION
 AT THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK. THE BORE, BORE PIT 26+25
 AND HH 28+08 APPEAR TO BE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY WHERE NO
 EASEMENT IS SHOWN ON THE SURVEY. THIS IS NOT PERMITTED.
 MERCER AVENUE, NORTH OF OKEECHOBEE ROAD, SHOWS THE BORE
 AND BORE PIT IN THE ROW.
 F. CURRENT SHEET 15 OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES PROPOSED BORE
 PIT 34+63, IS PASSED BY ZONING.
 G. CURRENT SHEET 16 OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES PROPOSED HH
 40+70, IS PASSED BY ZONING.
 H. 2/2/22 SUBMITTED SHEET 20 OF 31 (CURRENT 17/18 OF
 29), WHICH INCLUDES TIE IN 45+15, IS PASSED BY ZONING.
 NOTE: SURVEY PAGE 8 OF 19 VERIFIED THAT THIS PORTION OF
 PROJECT IS WITHIN PBC ROW. NOTE: PLEASE UPLOAD THE
 REVISED SHEET THAT WAS PROVIDED TO ZONING AS SEPARATE
 EMAIL PACKET TO ENSURE MOST CURRENT PLANS ARE UPLOADED.
 I. 2/2/22 SUBMITTED SHEET 21 OF 31 (CURRENT 18/19 OF
 29), WHICH INCLUDES TIE IN 50+24, IS PASSED BY ZONING.
 BASED ON THE WIDTH OF THE ROW, THE PROXIMITY OF THE
 BORE TO THE OFF RAMP AND THE NEW PLANS, NO SURVEY
 REQUIRED AT THIS LOCATION. NOTE: PLEASE UPLOAD THE
 REVISED SHEET THAT WAS PROVIDED TO ZONING AS SEPARATE
 EMAIL PACKET TO ENSURE MOST CURRENT PLANS ARE UPLOADED.
 J. 2/2/22 SUBMITTED SHEET 22 OF 31 (CURRENT 19/20 OF
 29), WHICH INCLUDES HH 55+07. PREVIOUSLY ISSUED
 COMMENT: THE SURVEY OF THIS LOCATION IS REQUIRED SO
 THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT THE BORE AT THIS LOCATION IS
 NOT ON PRIVATE PROPERTY OR THAT THERE IS A UTILITY
 EASEMENT IF THE BORE ENCROACHES. NOTE: PLEASE UPLOAD
 THE REVISED SHEET THAT WAS PROVIDED TO ZONING AS
 SEPARATE EMAIL PACKET TO ENSURE MOST CURRENT PLANS ARE
 UPLOADED.
 K. 2/2/22 SUBMITTED SHEET 23 OF 31 (CURRENT 20/21 OF
 29), WHICH INCLUDES TIE IN 60+69. PREVIOUSLY ISSUED
 COMMENT: THE BORE ON SHEET 23 STILL SHOWS ENCROACHMENT
 ON PRIVATE PROPERTY (OWNED BY FPL). UNLESS THERE IS A
 UTILITY EASEMENT SHOWN ON THE SURVEY AT THESE
 LOCATIONS, YOU MAY NOT CROSS ONTO PRIVATE PROPERTY.
 NOTE: BASED ON REVIEWING THE PALM BEACH COUNTY PROPERTY
 APPRAISER SITE, THE SIDEWALK IS NOT WHOLLY WITHIN THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY; THEREFORE, YOUR BORE UNDER THE SIDEWALK
 CROSSES ON PRIVATE PROPERTY, WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED.
 THE SURVEY IS REQUIRED TO VERIFY THAT EITHER YOU ARE
 NOT ON PRIVATE PROPERTY OR THAT THERE IS A UTILITY
 EASEMENT FOR WHERE YOU ENCROACH. NOTE: PLEASE UPLOAD
 THE REVISED SHEET THAT WAS PROVIDED TO ZONING AS
 SEPARATE EMAIL PACKET TO ENSURE MOST CURRENT PLANS ARE
 UPLOADED.
 L. 2/2/22 SUBMITTED SHEET 24 OF 31 (CURRENT 21/22 OF
 29), WHICH INCLUDES HH 67+59, IS PASSED BY ZONING. NO
 SURVEY FOR THIS AREA IS REQUIRED SINCE STAFF HAS
 REVIEWED THE SURVEYS ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF OKEECHOBEE AT
 THIS LOCATION TO VERIFY THE THAT BACK OF SIDEWALK IS
 THE ROW LINE. NOTE: PLEASE UPLOAD THE REVISED SHEET
 THAT WAS PROVIDED TO ZONING AS SEPARATE EMAIL PACKET TO
 ENSURE MOST CURRENT PLANS ARE UPLOADED. THESE PLANS
 SHOW THE CORRECT ROW LINES AS WELL.
 M. CURRENT SHEET 23 OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES PROPOSED HH
 74+83, REQUIRES A SURVEY, PREPARED BY FLORIDA LICENSED
 SURVEYOR, SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT THE SAPODILLA
 AVE SECTION OF THE BORE IS WITHIN THE ROW AND DOES NOT
 INTERFERE WITH EXISTING TREES AND INFRASTRUCTURE. FROM
 THE RECENT RECONSTRUCTION OF THIS AREA, STAFF CAN
 VERIFY THAT THE ROW LINE IS NOT SHOWN CORRECTLY ON THE
 ENGINEERING PLAN AND THAT BORE PIT 70+88 ENCROACHES ON
 PRIVATE PROPERTY, WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED AS THERE IS NO
 UTILITY EASEMENT AT THAT LOCATION.
 N. *** UPLOAD PLAN INCLUDED IN EMAIL TO CITY BUT NOT IN
 THE PERMIT SET. PREVIOUS PLAN SUBMITTAL FAILS FOR SAME
 REASON - CURRENT SHEET 24 OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES
 PROPOSED HH 82+78, REQUIRES A SURVEY, PREPARED BY
 FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR, SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY
 THAT THE BORE IS WITHIN THE ROW. FROM THE RECENT
 RECONSTRUCTION OF THIS AREA, STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT THE
 ROW LINE IS NOT SHOWN CORRECTLY ON THE ENGINEERING PLAN
 AND THAT HH 82+78 ENCROACHES ON PRIVATE PROPERTY, WHICH
 IS NOT PERMITTED AS THERE IS NO UTILITY EASEMENT AT
 THAT LOCATION.
 O. CURRENT SHEET 25 OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES BORE PIT
 02+50, REQUIRES A SURVEY, PREPARED BY FLORIDA LICENSED
 SURVEYOR, SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT THE BORE IS
 WITHIN THE ROW. BORE PIT 02+50 IS SHOWN ON PRIVATE
 PROPERTY WITH NO EASEMENT AND IS NOT PERMITTED.
 P. CURRENT SHEET 26 OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES HH 08+35,
 REQUIRES A SURVEY, PREPARED BY FLORIDA LICENSED
 SURVEYOR, SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT THE BORE AND HH
 IS WITHIN THE ROW.
 Q. CURRENT SHEET 27 OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES PROPOSED HH
 14+90, REQUIRES A SURVEY, PREPARED BY FLORIDA LICENSED
 SURVEYOR, SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT THE BORE, BORE
 PITS AND HH IS WITHIN THE ROW. THE ENGINEERING PLAN
 FAILS TO SHOW ALL EXISTING TREES ALONG SAPODILLA. THE
 EDGE OF THE HH EXCAVATION IS REQUIRED TO BE AT LEAST 10
 FEET FROM A TREE TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THE TREE AND ITS
 ROOT SYSTEM. HH 14+90 DOES NOT MEET THIS REQUIREMENT
 AND MUST BE IN AN ALTERNATIVE LOCATION. YOU ARE NOT
 PERMITTED TO OPEN CUT AROUND THE TREE AS SHOWN.
 R. CURRENT SHEET 28 OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES HH 22+10,
 REQUIRES A SURVEY, PREPARED BY FLORIDA LICENSED
 SURVEYOR, SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT THE BORE, BORE
 PITS AND HH ARE WITHIN THE ROW. THE ROW HAS BEEN
 RECONSTRUCTED SINCE THE LAST SURVEY THAT WAS PROVIDED.
 THERE ARE PLANTERS THAT ARE BOTH SHOWN AND NOT SHOWN ON
 THE ENGINEERING PLANS SURROUNDED BY A STRUCTURAL SOIL
 SYSTEM THAT IS NOT PERMITTED TO BE DISTURBED BY THE
 INSTALLATION OF THE PROPOSED HH 22+10 OR THE BORE
 ROUTE, SO THE CURRENT LOCATION IS NOT APPROVED. THE
 FULL AREA COVERED BY THE STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER THE
 SIDEWALK IS A MINIMUM OF 19 FEET EAST TO WEST AND THE
 FULL DEPTH OF THE SIDEWALK FROM THE CURB TO THE EDGE OF
 THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE. NO EXCAVATION OR INSTALLATION
 MAY OCCUR CLOSER THAN SEVEN (7) FEET FROM A PARALLEL
 LINE WITH THE OUTER EDGES OF THE PLANTER WALLS, FROM
 THE CURB FACE TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE. THIS SHALL BE
 CLEARLY DEMONSTRATED ON THE PLANS. ANY BORE SHALL
 CLEARLY BE SHOWN TO BE AT LEAST 36 INCHES BELOW THE
 STRUCTURAL SOIL SYSTEM LIMITS. THIS COMMENT WAS
 PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED.
 S. CURRENT SHEET 29 OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES HH 28+45,
 REQUIRES A SURVEY, PREPARED BY FLORIDA LICENSED
 SURVEYOR, SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT THE BORE, BORE
 PITS AND HH IS WITHIN THE ROW. THE ROW HAS BEEN
 RECONSTRUCTED SINCE THE LAST SURVEY THAT WAS PROVIDED.
 THE PLANTERS THAT ARE SHOWN ENGINEERING PLANS ARE
 SURROUNDED BY A STRUCTURAL SOIL SYSTEM THAT IS NOT
 PERMITTED TO BE DISTURBED BY THE INSTALLATION OF THE
 PROPOSED HH 25+35 OR THE BORE ROUTE, SO THE CURRENT
 LOCATION IS NOT APPROVED. THE FULL AREA COVERED BY THE
 STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER THE SIDEWALK IS A MINIMUM OF 19
 FEET EAST TO WEST AND THE FULL DEPTH OF THE SIDEWALK
 FROM THE CURB TO THE EDGE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE. NO
 EXCAVATION OR INSTALLATION MAY OCCUR CLOSER THAN SEVEN
 (7) FEET FROM A PARALLEL LINE WITH THE OUTER EDGES OF
 THE PLANTER WALLS, FROM THE CURB FACE TO THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE. THIS SHALL BE CLEARLY DEMONSTRATED
 ON THE PLANS. ANY BORE SHALL CLEARLY BE SHOWN TO BE AT
 LEAST 36 INCHES BELOW THE STRUCTURAL SOIL SYSTEM
 LIMITS. THIS COMMENT WAS PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED.
  
 2) THE BORE SHOWN AT 5 TO 12 FEET BELOW GRADE IS AT A
 SUFFICIENT DEPTH TO AVOID TREE AND PALM DAMAGE. THE
 FOLLOWING BORE PROFILE SHEETS, EXCEPT AS SPECIFICALLY
 LISTED, COMPLY WITH ZONING REQUIREMENTS:
  
 A. SHEET 10A OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES HH 00+00 AND
 PROPOSED BORE PIT 02+80.
 B. SHEETS 11A AND 11B OF 29, WHICH INCLUDE PROPOSED HH
 05+10 AND ADDITIONAL HHS.
 C. SHEETS 12A AND 12B OF 29, WHICH INCLUDE PROPOSED HH
 13+80 AND ADDITIONAL BORE PITS.
 D. SHEETS 13A AND 13B OF 29, WHICH INCLUDE PROPOSED HH
 23+25 AND BORE PIT 19+90.
 E. SHEET 14A OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES PROPOSED HH 28+08
 AND ADDITIONAL BORE PITS.
 F. SHEET 15A OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES PROPOSED BORE PIT
 34+63.
 G. SHEET 16A OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES PROPOSED HH 40+70.
 H. SHEET 20A OF 31, WHICH INCLUDES TIE IN 45+15 NOT IN
 CITY ROW SO NO ZONING REVIEW OF UTILITY PROFILE.
 I. SHEET 21A OF 31, WHICH INCLUDES TIE IN 50+24 NOT IN
 CITY ROW SO NO ZONING REVIEW OF UTILITY PROFILE.
 J. SHEET 22A OF 31, WHICH INCLUDES HH 55+07 NOT IN CITY
 ROW SO NO ZONING REVIEW OF UTILITY PROFILE.
 K. SHEET 23A OF 31, WHICH INCLUDES TIE IN 60+69 NOT IN
 CITY ROW SO NO ZONING REVIEW OF UTILITY PROFILE.
 L. SHEET 24A OF 31, WHICH INCLUDES TIE IN 60+69 NOT IN
 CITY ROW SO NO ZONING REVIEW OF UTILITY PROFILE.
 M. SHEET 23A AND 23C OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES PROPOSED HH
 74+8 APPROVED BY ZONING AND 23B NOT IN CITY ROW SO NO
 ZONING REVIEW OF UTILITY PROFILE.
 N. *** PLAN INCLUDED IN EMAIL TO CITY BUT NOT IN THE
 PERMIT SET. SHEET 24A OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES PROPOSED HH
 82+78.
 O. SHEET 25A OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES BORE PIT 02+50.
 P. SHEET 26A OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES HH 08+35.
 Q. SHEET 27A OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES PROPOSED HH 14+90,
 DOES NOT PASS ZONING DUE TO HH 14+90 DIRECTLY IMPACTING
 TREE ROOTS.
 R. SHEET 28A AND 28B OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES HH 22+10,
 DOES NOT PASS ZONING UNTIL THE AVOIDANCE OF THE
 STRUCTURAL SOIL SYSTEM IS PROVIDED.
 S. SHEET 29A OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES PROPOSED HH 25+35,
 DOES NOT PASS ZONING UNTIL THE AVOIDANCE OF THE
 STRUCTURAL SOIL SYSTEM IS PROVIDED.
  
 3) THE CITY HAS ON FILE THE PRIVATE UTILITY PROVIDER
 APPROVAL OF THE BORE FOR ALL OF THE SECTIONS EXCEPT THE
 NEWLY SHOWN SAPODILLA AND FERN SECTIONS. PLEASE PROVIDE
 UPDATED LETTERS FOR THESE SECTIONS OR CLEARLY
 DEMONSTRATE THAT ALL BORES, HANDHOLES AND BORE PITS ARE
 AT LEAST FIVE FEET FROM EXISTING PRIVATE UTILITY
 FACILITIES.
  
 4) PLEASE DO NOT UPLOAD THE MOT PLANS WITH THIS WCF ROW
 PERMIT. MOT PLANS ARE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY USE PERMIT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
  
 5) PROVIDE AN UPDATED PLAN KEY SHEET FOR THE LENGTH OF
 THE PROJECT. THIS WAS INCLUDED IN THE SET OF PLANS
 EMAILED TO PLANNING STAFF.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 8 Status F Date 2022-02-22 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2022-02-22 Time 14:01 Rev Time 1.00
Received By eschneid Date 2022-02-22 Time 10:45 Sent To  
Notes
2022-02-22 14:02:30INSUFFICIENT
  
 1) SHEET 17B WAS NOT UPLOADED. SHEET 18A WAS UPLOADED
 IN ITS PLACE. PLEASE SUBMIT SHEET 17B.
  
 2) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE A SURVEY, PREPARED BY
 FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR, FOR SHEETS 22 AND 23.
  
 A. THE BORE ON SHEET 22 WAS SHIFTED TO SHOW FURTHER
 AWAY FROM THE CORNER OF THE PRIVATE PROPERTY THAT IS
 SHOWN ON THE ENGINEERING PLAN ENCROACHING INTO THE
 SIDEWALK. THE SURVEY OF THIS LOCATION IS REQUIRED SO
 THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT THE BORE AT THIS LOCATION IS
 NOT ON PRIVATE PROPERTY OR THAT THERE IS A UTILITY
 EASEMENT IF THE BORE ENCROACHES.
  
 B. THE BORE ON SHEET 23 STILL SHOWS ENCROACHMENT ON
 PRIVATE PROPERTY (OWNED BY FPL). UNLESS THERE IS A
 UTILITY EASEMENT SHOWN ON THE SURVEY AT THESE
 LOCATIONS, YOU MAY NOT CROSS ONTO PRIVATE PROPERTY.
 NOTE: BASED ON REVIEWING THE PALM BEACH COUNTY PROPERTY
 APPRAISER SITE, THE SIDEWALK IS NOT WHOLLY WITHIN THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY; THEREFORE, YOUR BORE UNDER THE SIDEWALK
 CROSSES ON PRIVATE PROPERTY, WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED.
 THE SURVEY IS REQUIRED TO VERIFY THAT EITHER YOU ARE
 NOT ON PRIVATE PROPERTY OR THAT THERE IS A UTILITY
 EASEMENT FOR WHERE YOU ENCROACH.
  
 3) THE NEW PLANS SHOW THE BORE ROUTE PROCEEDING ALONG
 SAPODILLA AVENUE AND FERN STREET (SHEETS 25, 27, 28,
 29, 30 INSTEAD OF ROSEMARY AVENUE AS IN THE PREVIOUS
 SUBMITTALS. PROVIDE A SURVEY, PREPARED BY FLORIDA
 LICENSED SURVEYOR, FOR THE NEW ROUTE ON SAPODILLA
 AVENUE.
  
 4) THE NEW BORE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF OKEECHOBEE
 BOULEVARD (SHEET 26), JUST WEST OF ROSEMARY AVENUE, IS
 VERY CLOSE TO THE PROPERTY LINE. PROVIDE A SURVEY,
 PREPARED BY FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR, OF THIS LOCATION
 IS REQUIRED SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT THE BORE AT
 THIS LOCATION IS NOT ON PRIVATE PROPERTY OR THAT THERE
 IS A UTILITY EASEMENT IF THE BORE ENCROACHES.
  
 5) NO SHEET 29 IS PROVIDED, YET THERE ARE TWO SHEET
 30S. THE LOCATION MAP SHOWS THE INTERSECTION OF
 SAPODILLA AVENUE AND FERN STREET AS SHEET 29, YET IS IT
 LISTED AS SHEET 30. LOCATION MAP SHEET 30 FOR THE
 INTERSECTION OF FERN STREET AND ROSEMARY AVENUE IS NOT
 PROVIDED. IT APPEARS THE CROSS SECTIONS MAY BE PROPERLY
 LABELED.
  
 6) UPDATED COMMENT: ENGINEERING SHEET 30 WILL NEED TO
 SHOW THAT ANY BORE PITS AND HANDHOLE ON THE NORTH AND
 SOUTH SIDES OF FERN STREET AS WELL AS THE BORES, DO NOT
 DISTURB THE STRUCTURAL SOILS THAT EXTEND FIVE (5) FEET
 OUT FROM THE EDGE OF THE TREE PITS. ADDITIONALLY, NO
 UPDATED SURVEY SHOWING THE SOUTH SIDE OF FERN STREET IN
 THE LOCATION OF WORK WAS PROVIDED. CURRENTLY THE
 SURVEYOR'S NOTES COVER THE AREA ON THE LAST SURVEY THAT
 STAFF HAS ON FILE.
  
 7) THE BORE SHOWN AT 5 TO 12 FEET BELOW GRADE IS AT A
 SUFFICIENT DEPTH TO AVOID TREE AND PALM DAMAGE.
  
 8) THE INSTALLATION CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT SUNSHINE
 811 TO VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES AND VERIFY
 ALL DEPTHS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ALL CITY UTILITIES
 MUST BE LOCATED BY SOFT DIG METHODS BEFORE STARTING THE
 WORK.
  
 9) THE RIGHT-OF-WAY USE PERMIT REQUIRES YOU TO PROVIDE
 A CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE, WHICH IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 78-406 OF THE CITY CODE
 SPECIFICALLY NAMES THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, ITS
 COMMISSIONERS, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS AS
 ADDITIONAL INSURED.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 7 Status F Date 2021-09-10 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2021-09-10 Time 16:01 Rev Time 0.75
Received By eschneid Date 2021-08-11 Time 14:05 Sent To  
Notes
2021-09-10 16:10:47INSUFFICIENT
  
 1) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE SURVEY FOR SHEETS 22 AND 23.
  
 A. THE BORE ON SHEET 22 WAS SHIFTED TO SHOW FURTHER
 AWAY FROM THE CORNER OF THE PRIVATE PROPERTY THE IS
 SHOWN ON THE ENGINEERING PLAN ENCROACHING INTO THE
 SIDEWALK. THE SURVEY OF THIS LOCATION IS REQUIRED SO
 THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT THE BORE AT THIS LOCATION IS
 NOT ON PRIVATE PROPERTY OR THAT THERE IS A UTILITY
 EASEMENT IF THE BORE ENCROACHES.
  
 B. THE BORE ON SHEET 23 STILL SHOWS ENCROACHMENT ON
 PRIVATE PROPERTY (OWNED BY FPL). UNLESS THERE IS A
 UTILITY EASEMENT SHOWN ON THE SURVEY AT THESE
 LOCATIONS, YOU MAY NOT CROSS ONTO PRIVATE PROPERTY.
 NOTE: BASED ON REVIEWING THE PALM BEACH COUNTY PROPERTY
 APPRAISER SITE, THE SIDEWALK IS NOT WHOLLY WITHIN THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY; THEREFORE, YOUR BORE UNDER THE SIDEWALK
 CROSSES ON PRIVATE PROPERTY, WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED.
 THE SURVEY IS REQUIRED TO VERIFY THAT EITHER YOU ARE
 NOT ON PRIVATE PROPERTY OR THAT THERE IS A UTILITY
 EASEMENT FOR WHERE YOU ENCROACH.
  
 2) REPEAT COMMENT: ENGINEERING SHEET 29 SHOWS A NEW
 HANDHOLE IN THE SIDEWALK ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES
 OF FERN STREET.
  
 A. HANDHOLE 99+60 ? THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE UPDATED
 RIGHT-OF-WAY CONFIGURATION ON THE ENGINEERING PLAN
 INCLUDING DIMENSIONS. THE NEW TREE PITS ARE SURROUNDED
 BY A LARGER AREA OF STRUCTURAL SOIL, WHICH YOU ARE NOT
 PERMITTED TO DISTURB WITH THE DIGGING AND INSTALLATION
 OF THE HANDHOLE. THE STRUCTURAL SOIL EXTENDS FIVE (5)
 FEET OUT FROM THE EDGE OF THE TREE PIT. NOTE: SHEET 29
 CALLS THIS OUT AS 99+60; HOWEVER, SHEETS 29B AND 29C
 REFERENCE THIS HANDHOLE AS 1+61. ALL SHEETS MUST SHOW
 THE SAME, ACCURATE INFORMATION. THE FINAL RIGHT-OF-WAY
 CONFIGURATION NEEDS TO BE SHOWN ON THE SURVEY SO STAFF
 CAN VERIFY WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE ENGINEERING PLANS.
  
 B. NO UPDATED SURVEY SHOWING THE SOUTH SIDE OF FERN
 STREET IN THE LOCATION OF WORK WAS PROVIDED. CURRENTLY
 THE SURVEYOR'S NOTES COVER THE AREA.
  
 3) PLEASE NOTE THAT CITYPLACE RETAIL, LLC, IS IN THE
 PROCESS OF RECONFIGURING THE SIDEWALK/LANDSCAPE WITHIN
 THE OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD RIGHT-OF-WAY AT THE LOCATION
 OF HANDHOLE 1+69. YOU WILL NEED TO VERIFY THE FINAL
 CONDITIONS TO COORDINATE YOUR INSTALLATION. STAFF IS
 CONCERNED WITH THE FINAL GRADE OF THE HANDHOLE IN
 RELATIONSHIP TO THE SURROUNDING AREA. **** HAVE YOU
 COORDINATED WITH CITYPLACE RETAIL?
  
 4) PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PROPOSED TIE IN AT 82+59 HAS
 SHRUBS AND OTHER PLANTINGS THAT MUST BE REPLACED (NOT
 GRASS AS STATED). THE EDGE OF THE TIE IN LOCATION MUST
 BE AT LEAST EIGHT (8) FEET FROM THE TRUNK OF THE TREE.
  
 5) THE BORE SHOWN AT 5 TO 12 FEET BELOW GRADE IS AT A
 SUFFICIENT DEPTH TO AVOID TREE AND PALM DAMAGE.
  
 6) THE INSTALLATION CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT SUNSHINE
 811 TO VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES AND VERIFY
 ALL DEPTHS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ALL CITY UTILITIES
 MUST BE LOCATED BY SOFT DIG METHODS BEFORE STARTING THE
 WORK.
  
 7) THE RIGHT-OF-WAY USE PERMIT REQUIRES YOU TO PROVIDE
 A CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE, WHICH IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 78-406 OF THE CITY CODE
 SPECIFICALLY NAMES THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, ITS
 COMMISSIONERS, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS AS
 ADDITIONAL INSURED.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 6 Status F Date 2021-07-19 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2021-07-19 Time 17:37 Rev Time 0.50
Received By eschneid Date 2021-07-19 Time 17:37 Sent To  
Notes
2021-07-19 17:38:18INSUFFIENT
  
 1) REPEAT COMMENT: ALONG CLARE AVENUE (BETWEEN
 HANDHOLES 0+00 AND 5+35), THE LATEST SURVEY SHOWS
 APPROXIMATELY THREE (3) FEET BETWEEN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY
 LINE AND THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT AS WELL AS OFFSET FROM
 THE BUILDINGS. THE ENGINEERING PLANS SHOW THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AT THE FACE OF THE BUILDINGS WITH AN
 APPROXIMATELY SIX (6) FOOT WIDE SIDEWALK. WHILE THE
 BORE IS GENERALLY SHOWN AS FOUR (4) FEET FROM THE FACE
 OF THE BUILDINGS ON THE ENGINEERING PLAN, BASED ON THE
 SURVEY, THE BORE IS WITHIN PRIVATE PROPERTY, WHICH IS
 NOT PERMITTED UNLESS A UTILITY EASEMENT IS PRESENT. NO
 UTILITY EASEMENT IS SHOWN ON THE SURVEY. PLEASE REVIEW
 YOUR PLANS AND SHOW ACCURATE CONDITIONS. THIS NEEDS TO
 BE CORRECTED EITHER WITH A NEW SURVEY OR REVISED
 ENGINEERING PLANS.
  
 2) REPEAT COMMENT: SHEET 13A STATES THAT TIE IN 2+65
 REQUIRES THE REMOVAL AND RESTORATION OF A GRASS AREA.
 THERE IS NO GRASS IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG CLARE
 AVENUE, SO THIS MAY NOT OCCUR AS IT WOULD BE ON PRIVATE
 PROPERTY. NOTE: SHEET 13 LISTS THE SAME TIE IN AS
 REPLACING CONCRETE. ALL PLANS MUST STATE SAME
 CONDITIONS.
  
 3) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE SURVEY FOR SHEETS 22 AND 23.
 THE BORE ON SHEET 22 APPEARS TO CROSS INTO PRIVATE
 PROPERTY AND THE BORE ON SHEET 23 SHOWS ENCROACHMENT ON
 PRIVATE PROPERTY. UNLESS THERE IS A UTILITY EASEMENT
 SHOWN ON THE SURVEY AT THESE LOCATIONS, YOU MAY NOT
 CROSS ONTO PRIVATE PROPERTY. NOTE: BASED ON REVIEWING
 THE PALM BEACH COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER SITE, THE
 SIDEWALK IS NOT WHOLLY WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY;
 THEREFORE, YOUR BORE UNDER THE SIDEWALK CROSSES ON
 PRIVATE PROPERTY, WHICH IS NOTE PERMITTED. THE SURVEY
 IS REQUIRED TO VERIFY THAT EITHER YOU ARE NOT ON
 PRIVATE PROPERTY OR THAT THERE IS A UTILITY EASEMENT
 FOR WHERE YOU ENCROACH.
  
 4) REPEAT COMMENT: SHEETS 24 AND 25 STILL SHOW THE
 INCORRECT LOCATION OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AT THE NORTH END
 OF HOWARD PARK. THE AREA SHOWN AS RIGHT-OF-WAY AT THE
 BACK OF THE SIDEWALK IS PRIVATE PROPERTY OWNED BY THE
 CITY AND NOT RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE HANDHOLE, TIE IN AND
 BORE HAVE BEEN SHOWN MOVED OUT OF THE PRIVATE PROPERTY
 (BACK OF SIDEWALK); HOWEVER, THE ENGINEERING PLAN NEEDS
 TO BE CORRECTED TO SHOW THE ACCURATE RIGHT-OF-WAY
 CONDITION.
  
 5) REPEAT COMMENT: ENGINEERING SHEET 29 SHOWS A NEW
 HANDHOLE IN THE SIDEWALK ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES
 OF FERN STREET. THE CONSTRUCTION FOR THE 360 SOUTH
 ROSEMARY OFFICE TOWER HAS BEEN COMPLETED. YOU MUST
 UPDATE YOUR PLANS TO SHOW THE COMPLETED RIGHT-OF-WAY
 WORK AND VERIFY THAT HANDHOLE 99+60 DOES NOT CONFLICT
 WITH STREET TREES OR A POSSIBLE GAS LINE. ADDITIONALLY,
 THE SURVEY NEEDS TO SHOW THE SOUTH SIDE OF FERN STREET
 IN THE LOCATION OF WORK. CURRENTLY THE SURVEYOR'S NOTES
 COVER THE AREA.
  
 6) PLEASE NOTE THAT CITYPLACE RETAIL, LLC, IS IN THE
 PROCESS OF RECONFIGURING THE SIDEWALK/LANDSCAPE WITHIN
 THE OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD RIGHT-OF-WAY AT THE LOCATION
 OF HANDHOLE 1+69. YOU WILL NEED TO VERIFY THE FINAL
 CONDITIONS TO COORDINATE YOUR INSTALLATION. STAFF IS
 CONCERNED WITH THE FINAL GRADE OF THE HANDHOLE IN
 RELATIONSHIP TO THE SURROUNDING AREA.
  
 7) THE BORE SHOWN AT 5 TO 12 FEET BELOW GRADE IS AT A
 SUFFICIENT DEPTH TO AVOID TREE AND PALM DAMAGE.
  
 8) THE INSTALLATION CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT SUNSHINE
 811 TO VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES AND VERIFY
 ALL DEPTHS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ALL CITY UTILITIES
 MUST BE LOCATED BY SOFT DIG METHODS BEFORE STARTING THE
 WORK.
  
 9) THE RIGHT-OF-WAY USE PERMIT REQUIRES YOU TO PROVIDE
 A CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE, WHICH IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 78-406 OF THE CITY CODE
 SPECIFICALLY NAMES THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, ITS
 COMMISSIONERS, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS AS
 ADDITIONAL INSURED.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 5 Status F Date 2021-02-11 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2021-02-11 Time 17:13 Rev Time 5.00
Received By eschneid Date 2021-02-11 Time 17:13 Sent To  
Notes
2021-02-11 17:14:08INCOMPLETE APPLICATION
  
 PERMIT 19020053 - MCIMETRO PROJECT #:1801CVFF.210
 UNDERGROUND FIBER CLARE TO CLEMATIS - 5TH REVIEW
  
 PLEASE SEE THE LIST BELOW FOR AN ANALYSIS OF THE
 DEFICIENCIES IN INFORMATION REQUIRED BY SECTION 78-401
 OF THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CODE AS PART OF THE
 COMMUNICATION FACILITIES PLACEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION.
 THE DEFICIENT INFORMATION MUST BE PROVIDED FOR STAFF TO
 REVIEW THE PERMIT APPLICATION. PLEASE NOTE THAT STAFF
 HAS ALSO INCLUDED SOME SUBSTANTIVE REVIEW COMMENTS,
 THAT WHILE NOT RESULTING IN A DEFICIENT APPLICATION,
 NEED TO BE ADDRESSED OR THE PERMIT WILL NOT BE
 APPROVED.
  
 1) OUTSTANDING PLAN SHEETS REQUIRED:
  
 A. THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE SURVEY(S) FROM EXISTING
 HANDHOLE 0+00 TO HANDHOLE 14+85. SURVEY SHEETS 1, 2 AND
 3 DO NOT SHOW THE CLARE AVENUE AND BLANCHE STREET
 RIGHTS-OF-WAY LINE IN THE SAME LOCATION AS ON
 ENGINEERING SHEETS 13 AND 14 (LABELED AS 13). ALONG
 CLARE AVENUE THE SURVEY SHOWS AN APPROXIMATELY THREE
 FOOT WIDE SIDEWALK, WHICH WHEN COMPARED TO THE LOCATION
 OF THE BORE ON THE ENGINEERING PLAN HAS THE BORE
 CROSSING OUT OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY TO PRIVATE PROPERTY IN
 A FEW INSTANCES. NO UTILITY EASEMENT IS SHOWN ON THE
 SURVEY TO PERMIT THE INSTALLATION ON PRIVATE PROPERTY.
 PLEASE REVIEW YOUR PLANS AND SHOW ACCURATE CONDITIONS.
 THE BLANCHE STREET FIBER BORE IS SHOWN WITHIN THE AREA
 THAT IS SHOWN AS RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE SURVEY.
  
 B. SHEET 13A STATES THAT TIE IN 2+65 REQUIRES THE
 REMOVAL AND RESTORATION OF A GRASS AREA. THERE IS NO
 GRASS IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG CLARE AVENUE, SO THIS
 MAY NOT OCCUR AS IT WOULD BE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY. NOTE:
 SHEET 13 LISTS THE SAME TIE IN AS REPLACING CONCRETE.
 ALL PLANS MUST STATE SAME CONDITIONS.
  
 C. REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE SURVEY FOR SHEETS 22 AND 23.
 THE BORE ON SHEET 22 APPEARS TO CROSS INTO PRIVATE
 PROPERTY AND THE BORE ON SHEET 23 SHOWS ENCROACHMENT ON
 PRIVATE PROPERTY. UNLESS THERE IS A UTILITY EASEMENT
 SHOWN ON THE SURVEY AT THESE LOCATIONS, YOU MAY NOT
 CROSS ONTO PRIVATE PROPERTY. ***** REMOVING THE PAGES
 DOES NOT ADDRESS WHETHER OR NOT YOU ARE CROSSING ONTO
 PRIVATE PROPERTY.
  
 D. REPEAT COMMENT: SHEETS 24 AND 25 STILL SHOW THE
 INCORRECT LOCATION OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE HANDHOLE,
 TIE IN AND BORE HAVE BEEN SHOWN MOVED OUT OF THE
 PRIVATE PROPERTY (BACK OF SIDEWALK); HOWEVER, THE
 ENGINEERING PLAN NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED TO SHOW THE
 ACCURATE CONDITION. ***** REMOVING THE PAGES DOES NOT
 CORRECT THE INCORRECT DEPICTION OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY
 LOCATION ON THE ENGINEERING PLANS.
  
 E. ENGINEERING SHEET 29 NOW SHOWS A NEW HANDHOLE IN THE
 SIDEWALK ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES OF FERN STREET. A
 REVIEW OF THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE NEW 360
 SOUTH ROSEMARY OFFICE TOWER INDICATES THAT THERE IS A
 DIRECT CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED HANDHOLE ON THE NORTH
 SIDE OF FERN STREET AND A STREET TREE AS WELL AS A GAS
 LINE. NEITHER THE SURVEY OR THE ENGINEERING PLAN SHOW
 THE GAS LINE IN THE SAME LOCATION AS THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN. IT APPEARS THAT THE GAS LINE IS BEING RELOCATED
 AS PART OF THE PROJECT. YOU MUST SHOW THE FINAL
 CONDITIONS AND DESIGN YOUR INSTALLATION TO NOT CONFLICT
 WITH THE FINAL CONDITIONS. ADDITIONALLY, THE SURVEY
 NEEDS TO SHOW THE SOUTH SIDE OF FERN STREET IN THE
 LOCATION OF WORK. CURRENTLY THE SURVEYOR?S NOTES COVER
 THE AREA.
  
 2) PLEASE NOTE THAT CITYPLACE RETAIL, LLC, IS IN THE
 PROCESS OF RECONFIGURING THE SIDEWALK WITHIN THE
 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD RIGHT-OF-WAY AT THE LOCATION OF
 HANDHOLE 1+69. YOU WILL NEED TO VERIFY THE FINAL
 CONDITIONS TO COORDINATE YOUR INSTALLATION.
  
 2) THE BORE SHOWN AT 5 TO 12 FEET BELOW GRADE IS AT A
 SUFFICIENT DEPTH TO AVOID TREE AND PALM DAMAGE.
  
 3) WHEN RESUBMITTING THE PLANS, INCLUDE THE PERMIT
 NUMBER (19020053) AND A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE
 COMMENTS.
  
 4) THE INSTALLATION CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT SUNSHINE
 811 TO VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES AND VERIFY
 ALL DEPTHS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ALL CITY UTILITIES
 MUST BE LOCATED BY SOFT DIG METHODS BEFORE STARTING THE
 WORK.
  
 5) THE RIGHT-OF-WAY USE PERMIT REQUIRES YOU TO PROVIDE
 A CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE, WHICH IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 78-406 OF THE CITY CODE
 SPECIFICALLY NAMES THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, ITS
 COMMISSIONERS, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS AS
 ADDITIONAL INSURED.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2020-10-26 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2020-10-26 Time 15:09 Rev Time 0.75
Received By eschneid Date 2020-10-26 Time 15:09 Sent To  
Notes
2020-10-26 15:10:01INCOMPLETE APPLICATION
  
 PERMIT 19020053 - MCIMETRO PROJECT #:1801CVFF.210
 UNDERGROUND FIBER CLARE TO CLEMATIS - 4TH REVIEW
  
 PLEASE SEE THE LIST BELOW FOR AN ANALYSIS OF THE
 DEFICIENCIES IN INFORMATION REQUIRED BY SECTION 78-401
 OF THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CODE AS PART OF THE
 COMMUNICATION FACILITIES PLACEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION.
 THE DEFICIENT INFORMATION MUST BE PROVIDED FOR STAFF TO
 REVIEW THE PERMIT APPLICATION. PLEASE NOTE THAT STAFF
 HAS ALSO INCLUDED SOME SUBSTANTIVE REVIEW COMMENTS,
 THAT WHILE NOT RESULTING IN A DEFICIENT APPLICATION,
 NEED TO BE ADDRESSED OR THE PERMIT WILL NOT BE
 APPROVED.
  
 1) OUTSTANDING PLAN SHEETS REQUIRED:
  
 A. PROVIDE THE SURVEY(S) FOR THE NEW ROUTE FROM TIE IN
 2+65 TO HANDHOLE 14+85.
  
 B. PROVIDE SURVEY FOR SHEETS 22 AND 23. THE BORE ON
 SHEET 22 APPEARS TO CROSS INTO PRIVATE PROPERTY AND THE
 BORE ON SHEET 23 SHOWS ENCROACHMENT ON PRIVATE
 PROPERTY. UNLESS THERE IS A UTILITY EASEMENT SHOWN ON
 THE SURVEY AT THESE LOCATIONS, YOU MAY NOT CROSS ONTO
 PRIVATE PROPERTY.
  
 C. SHEETS 24 AND 25 STILL SHOW THE INCORRECT LOCATION
 OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE HANDHOLE, TIE IN AND BORE HAVE
 BEEN SHOWN MOVED OUT OF THE PRIVATE PROPERTY (BACK OF
 SIDEWALK); HOWEVER, THE ENGINEERING PLAN NEEDS TO BE
 CORRECTED TO SHOW THE ACCURATE CONDITION.
  
 2) THE BORE SHOWN AT 6 TO 12 FEET BELOW GRADE IS AT A
 SUFFICIENT DEPTH TO AVOID TREE AND PALM DAMAGE.
  
 3) WHEN RESUBMITTING THE PLANS, INCLUDE THE PERMIT
 NUMBER (19020053) AND A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE
 COMMENTS.
  
 4) THE INSTALLATION CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT SUNSHINE
 811 TO VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES AND VERIFY
 ALL DEPTHS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ALL CITY UTILITIES
 MUST BE LOCATED BY SOFT DIG METHODS BEFORE STARTING THE
 WORK.
  
 5) THE RIGHT-OF-WAY USE PERMIT REQUIRES YOU TO PROVIDE
 A CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE, WHICH IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 78-406 OF THE CITY CODE
 SPECIFICALLY NAMES THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, ITS
 COMMISSIONERS, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS AS
 ADDITIONAL INSURED.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2020-08-21 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2020-08-21 Time 15:57 Rev Time 1.00
Received By eschneid Date 2020-08-19 Time 11:53 Sent To  
Notes
2020-08-21 15:57:31INCOMPLETE APPLICATION
  
 PERMIT 19020053 - MCIMETRO PROJECT #:1801CVFF.210
 UNDERGROUND FIBER CLARE TO CLEMATIS - 3RD REVIEW
  
 PLEASE SEE THE LIST BELOW FOR AN ANALYSIS OF THE
 DEFICIENCIES IN INFORMATION REQUIRED BY SECTION 78-401
 OF THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CODE AS PART OF THE
 COMMUNICATION FACILITIES PLACEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION.
 THE DEFICIENT INFORMATION MUST BE PROVIDED FOR STAFF TO
 REVIEW THE PERMIT APPLICATION. PLEASE NOTE THAT STAFF
 HAS ALSO INCLUDED SOME SUBSTANTIVE REVIEW COMMENTS,
 THAT WHILE NOT RESULTING IN A DEFICIENT APPLICATION,
 NEED TO BE ADDRESSED OR THE PERMIT WILL NOT BE
 APPROVED.
  
 1) ENGINEERING PLANS
  
 A. THE ENGINEERING PLANS DO NOT SHOW THE CLEMATIS
 STREET PHASE III PROJECT RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENTS.
 STAFF NEEDS TO VERIFY THAT THE PROPOSED FIBER CONDUIT,
 HANDHOLDS AND FUTURE COMMUNICATION POLES DO NOT
 INTERFERE WITH THE UNDER CONSTRUCTION RIGHT-OF-WAY
 PROJECT.
  
 B. TIE IN 2+43 IS SHOWN WITHIN A LANDSCAPE BULB OUT
 THAT IS BEING INSTALLED AS PART OF THE ADJACENT
 MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT. THE BULB OUT IS SLATED TO HAVE A
 ROYAL PALM TREE INSTALLED WITHIN IT. IF THE PALM TREE
 HAS BEEN INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE BORE TAKING PLACE, THEN
 THE BORE MAY NOT UTILIZE THE LANDSCAPE AREA AND INSTEAD
 MUST BE STARTED MORE THAN 10 FEET FROM THE TREE, WHICH
 WOULD BE IN THE SIDEWALK. IF THE BORE IS DONE BEFORE
 THE TREE INSTALLATION IT MAY UTILIZE THE LANDSCAPE AREA
 AS THERE WILL BE NO TREE THAT COULD BE DAMAGED.
  
 C. THE ENGINEERING PLANS MUST INCLUDE THE NOTES STATING
 1) UTILITIES MUST BE FIELD VERIFIED PRIOR TO DIGGING,
 2) ALL CITY UTILITIES MUST BE LOCATED BY SOFT DIG
 METHODS BEFORE STARTING WORK, AND 3) TREE
 GRATE/PLANTING AREAS MAY NOT BE USED TO ASSIST IN THE
 BORE. THESE NOTES ARE ON OTHER ENGINEERING PLANS THAT
 HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED.
  
 D. THERE ARE MULTIPLE SHEETS MISSING FOR MERCER TO
 AUSTRALIAN (KEY INDICATES THESE AS THE 16 SERIES). THIS
 IS THE FIBER FOR SHEETS 6-8 OF THE SURVEY. NOTE:
 PROVIDED THE BORE REMAINS WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AT 6
 FEET DEEP, THERE SHOULD BE NO TREES IMPACTED.
  
 E. NO SURVEY WAS PROVIDED FOR SHEET 23 AND 24. THE
 ENGINEERING PLAN INCORRECTLY SHOWS THE OKEECHOBEE
 BOULEVARD RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE CITY OWNS UP TO THE BACK OF
 THE SIDEWALK, SO NO BORE OR HANDHOLE MAY OCCUR AS
 SHOWN. THIS APPLIES TO HANDHOLE 59+16 AND THE FIBER ON
 EITHER SIDE OF IT THAT IS UNDERNEATH THE LANDSCAPE
 AREA.
  
 F. TIE IN 78-16 DIRECTLY CONFLICTS WITH A LIGHT POLE
 AND MAY CONFLICT WITH THE FOOTERS OF THE BUILDING.
  
 G. THE BORE SHOWN AT 6 TO 12 FEET BELOW GRADE IS AT A
 SUFFICIENT DEPTH TO AVOID TREE AND PALM DAMAGE.
  
 PLEASE NOTE:
  
 THE INSTALLATION CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT SUNSHINE 811
 TO VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES AND VERIFY ALL
 DEPTHS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ALL CITY UTILITIES MUST
 BE LOCATED BY SOFT DIG METHODS BEFORE STARTING THE
 WORK.
  
 THE RIGHT-OF-WAY USE PERMIT REQUIRES YOU TO PROVIDE A
 CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE, WHICH IN ACCORDANCE
 WITH SECTION 78-406 OF THE CITY CODE SPECIFICALLY NAMES
 THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, ITS COMMISSIONERS,
 OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS AS ADDITIONAL INSURED.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2020-03-16 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2020-03-16 Time 16:48 Rev Time 0.75
Received By eschneid Date 2020-03-16 Time 15:22 Sent To  
Notes
2020-03-16 16:47:07INCOMPLETE APPLICATION
  
 PERMIT 19020053 - MCIMETRO PROJECT #:1801CVFF.210
 UNDERGROUND FIBER CLARE TO CLEMATIS - 2ND REVIEW
  
 PLEASE SEE THE LIST BELOW FOR AN ANALYSIS OF THE
 DEFICIENCIES IN INFORMATION REQUIRED BY SECTION 78-401
 OF THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CODE AS PART OF THE
 COMMUNICATION FACILITIES PLACEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION.
 THE DEFICIENT INFORMATION MUST BE PROVIDED FOR STAFF TO
 REVIEW THE PERMIT APPLICATION. PLEASE NOTE THAT STAFF
 HAS ALSO INCLUDED SOME SUBSTANTIVE REVIEW COMMENTS,
 THAT WHILE NOT RESULTING IN A DEFICIENT APPLICATION,
 NEED TO BE ADDRESSED OR THE PERMIT WILL NOT BE
 APPROVED.
  
 1) ENGINEERING PLANS
  
 A. UPDATED COMMENT: THE ENGINEERING PLANS MUST SHOW THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE CLARE AVENUE
 RESIDENTIAL PROJECT (CLARE AND WILKINS AVENUES), THE
 ROSEMARY AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT, THE 360 SOUTH
 ROSEMARY PROJECT (SOUTH ROSEMARY AVENUE AND FERN
 STREET), THE QUADRILLE/FERN MAST ARM INSTALLATION
 PROJECT AND THE CLEMATIS STREET PHASE III PROJECT.
 STAFF NEEDS TO VERIFY THAT THE PROPOSED FIBER CONDUIT,
 MARKER POLES, HANDHOLDS AND FUTURE COMMUNICATION POLES
 DO NOT INTERFERE WITH THESE APPROVED RIGHT-OF-WAY
 PROJECTS.
  
 2) UPDATED COMMENT: SURVEY OF UNDERGROUND FACILITIES -
 THE SURVEY NEEDS TO BE AT A SIZE/SCALE THAT IS LEGIBLE.
 STAFF IS UNABLE TO MAKE OUT ANY DETAILS ON THE SURVEY
 THAT WAS PROVIDED.
  
 A. ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES NEED TO BE PROVIDED ON THE
 SURVEY. IF THE BORE IS PROPOSED WITHIN FIVE (5) FEET OF
 AN EXISTING UTILITY, YOU NEED TO PROVIDE A LETTER FROM
 THAT UTILITY THAT THE PROPOSED BORE DOES NOT INTERFERE
 WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THEIR SERVICES.
  
 B. THE SURVEY, PREPARED BY A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR,
 MUST SHOW THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, THE SIDEWALK, AND ANY
 TREES WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG THE FIBER CONDUIT
 PATH.
  
 C. THE ENGINEERING PLANS MUST SHOW THE SAME CONDITIONS
 AS THE SURVEY, SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT NONE OF
 THE PROPOSED WORK (MARKER POLES, HANDHOLDS OR CONDUIT
 IS BEING INSTALLED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY AND THAT NO
 TREES (SPECIFICALLY THEIR ROOT SYSTEM) ARE BEING
 AFFECTED.
  
 D. PROVIDE THE SURVEY BACK UP FOR SHEETS 19 THROUGH 22,
 SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT THE PROPOSED WORK IS IN
 THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE LOCATION MAP LINE APPEARS TO
 CROSS OUT OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE ONTO PRIVATE
 PROPERTY.
  
 3) REPEAT COMMENT: ESTIMATED SCHEDULE - NO SCHEDULE WAS
 PROVIDED. PROVIDE A NARRATIVE OF THE ESTIMATED SCHEDULE
 OF THE PROPOSED WORK.
  
 4) POLE STYLE - PLEASE NOTE THAT THE FUTURE POLES ARE
 REQUIRED TO MEET THE CITY CONCEALMENT STANDARDS
 OUTLINED IN SECTION 78-411 OF THE CITY CODE.
  
 NOTE: STAFF WILL NOT APPROVE THE INSTALLATION OF A SIX
 (6) FOOT TALL MARKER POLE ADJACENT TO THE HANDHOLES. IF
 THE HANDHOLES NEED TO BE MARKED, THEN PROVIDE THE
 INFORMATION ON THE HANDHOLE COVER.
  
 5) ELECTRONIC FORMAT OF SUBMITTAL -. A COPY OF ALL OF
 THE SUBMITTAL MATERIAL MUST BE SUBMITTED IN ELECTRONIC
 FORMAT.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2019-02-11 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2019-02-11 Time 16:19 Rev Time 2.00
Received By eschneid Date 2019-02-11 Time 16:19 Sent To  
Notes
2019-02-11 16:52:50PERMIT 19020053 - UNDERGROUND FIBER CLARE TO CLEMATIS
  
 THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE MISSING FROM THE APPLICATION
 SUBMITTAL AND THEREFORE THE APPLICATION IS DEFICIENT.
  
 1) COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES PLACEMENT PERMIT
 APPLICATION CITY RIGHTS-OF-WAY - THE APPLICATION LISTS
 COLLOCATION ON EXISTING TOWER AS THE TYPE OF FACILITY;
 HOWEVER, THE DETAILS OF THE ANTENNA INSTALLATIONS WERE
 NOT PROVIDED. PLEASE PROVIDE A BRIEF NARRATIVE OF WHAT
 IS PROPOSED SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THE TYPE OF
 FACILITY THAT YOU WILL BE INSTALLING.
  
 2) ENGINEERING PLANS, SIGNED AND SEALED BY FLORIDA
 REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER OR EXEMPT, 10FT, 20FT,
 OR 40FT SCALE:
  
 A. THE ENGINEERING PLANS WERE SUBMITTED AT A 1 INCH -
 50 FEET SCALE, WHICH DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE CITY
 SCALE REQUIREMENT LISTED IN THE APPLICATION. PLEASE
 PROVIDE THE PLANS AT THE REQUIRED SCALE.
  
 B. THE ENGINEERING PLANS MUST SHOW THE PROPOSED
 RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE CLARE AVENUE
 RESIDENTIAL PROJECT, THE PROPOSED AND UNDERCONSTUCTION
 ROSEMARY AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT AND THE
 UNDERCONSTRUCTION QUADRILLE/FERN MAST ARM INSTALLATION
 PROJECT. STAFF NEEDS TO VERIFY THAT THE PROPOSED FIBER
 CONDUIT, MARKER POLES, HANDHOLDS AND FUTURE
 COMMUNICATION POLES DO NOT INTERFERE WITH THESE
 APPROVED, PROPOSED AND CONSTRUCTED RIGHT-OF-WAY
 PROJECTS.
  
 C. PROVIDE COPIES OF SHEETS 19 THROUGH 22, WITH THE
 SURVEY BACK UP LISTED IN COMMENT 3, SO THAT STAFF CAN
 VERIFY THAT THE PROPOSED WORK IS IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 THE LOCATION MAP LINE APPEARS TO CROSS OUT OF THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE ONTO PRIVATE PROPERTY.
  
 D. THE PROPOSED PROJECT INCLUDES A NUMBER OF HANDHOLDS.
 THE DETAILS ON SHEET 09 ARE UNCLEAR AS TO WHAT THE
 HANDHOLD WILL LOOK LIKE AT GRADE. WILL THE LID OF THE
 HANDHOLD BOX BE VISIBLE AT THE GRADE, OR WILL IT BE
 COVERED WITH ANOTHER MATERIAL ? SOD, CONCRETE, PAVERS?
 PROVIDE A NARRATIVE TO ADDRESS. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS LISTED IN 2B. MAY
 CHANGE THE SURFACE MATERIAL WHERE THE PROPOSED HANDHOLD
 IS LOCATED.
  
 3) SURVEY OF UNDERGROUND FACILITIES - NO SURVEY WAS
 PROVIDED.
  
 A. PROVIDE A SURVEY SHOWING THE PROPERTY LINES AND ANY
 TREES WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG THE FIBER CONDUIT
 PATH.
  
 B. THE ENGINEERING PLANS MUST SHOW THE SAME CONDITIONS
 AS THE SURVEY, SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT NONE OF
 THE PROPOSED WORK (MARKER POLES, HANDHOLDS OR CONDUIT
 IS BEING INSTALLED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY AND THAT NO
 TREES (SPECIFICALLY THEIR ROOT SYSTEM) ARE BEING
 AFFECTED.
  
 4) INVENTORY OF REGISTRANT'S EXISTING FACILITIES - NO
 INFORMATION ON EXISTING FACILITIES WAS PROVIDED. SHOW
 THIS INFORMATION ON THE PLANS AND PROVIDE A NARRATIVE.
  
 5) CONCEALMENT METHODS DESCRIPTIONS - NO INFORMATION ON
 WHERE THE MARKER POLES WILL BE LOCATED AND TO HOW THEY
 WILL BE CONCEALED WAS PROVIDED. SHOW THIS INFORMATION
 ON THE PLANS AND PROVIDE A NARRATIVE.
  
 6) ESTIMATED SCHEDULE - NO SCHEDULE WAS PROVIDED.
 PROVIDE A NARRATIVE OF THE ESTIMATED SCHEDULE OF THE
 PROPOSED WORK.
  
 7) POLE PLACEMENT INFO AND MAKE-READY ESTIMATE - NO
 INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED ON THE LOCATION OF THE FUTURE
 POLES. SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON THE PLANS AND PROVIDE A
 NARRATIVE.
  
 8) PROOF OF MAILING NOTICE TO OWNERS, ONE COPY OF
 ADDRESS LIST OF PROPERTY OWNER'S ADDRESSES WITHIN 250
 FEET AND ONE COPY OF RADIUS MAP PROVIDED BY THE PAPA
 SHOWING THOSE PROPERTIES WITHIN 250 FEET OF AFFECTED
 RIGHTS-OF-WAY - THE APPLICATION CHECK LIST INDICATES
 THAT THIS WAS DONE (AS WELL AS THE AFFIDAVITS YOU
 PROVIDED), YET NONE OF THE REQUIRED DOCUMENTS WERE
 SUBMITTED TO THE CITY. PLEASE CLARIFY AND PROVIDE THE
 INFORMATION.
  
 9) ELECTRONIC FORMAT OF SUBMITTAL - ONLY THE PLANS WERE
 PROVIDED ON THE DISC. A COPY OF ALL OF THE SUBMITTAL
 MATERIAL MUST BE SUBMITTED IN ELECTRONIC FORMAT.
  
 10) FEES PAID - NO FEES WERE SUBMITTED. PLEASE PROVIDE
 THE JUSTIFICATION AS TO WHY YOU SHOULD NOT PAY FEES.
 PLEASE SEE SECTION A ON PAGE 4 OF THE APPLICATION FOR
 THE EXEMPTIONS. IF YOU DO NOT MEET THE EXEMPTION, THE
 REQUIRED FEES MUST BE SUBMITTED.
  
 11) AFFIDAVIT OF PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST - THE AFFIDAVIT
 WAS PROVIDED, BUT NO OWNERS LIST PROVIDED. PLEASE
 CLARIFY AND PROVIDE THE INFORMATION.
  
 12) PUBLIC NOTICE MAILER AFFIDAVIT - THE AFFIDAVIT WAS
 PROVIDED, BUT NOTHING TO SHOW WHAT WAS MAILED OUT WAS
 PROVIDED. PLEASE CLARIFY AND PROVIDE THE INFORMATION.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved